Slashdot Mirror


Halo 3 In the Works, Set To Crush PS3 Launch?

IGN has an article claiming to reveal a few rumours from around the industry. The most interesting of these rumours is the possibility that Halo 3 is in the works already, and what's more is being targeted at the PS3 launch date in an effort to undermine Sony. From the article: "The release of Halo 3 at the precise launch of PS3 is a pure, military tactical move, similar to the PS2's greatest lineup ever launching simultaneously with the launch of the Xbox and GameCube. It's designed to counter Sony's upcoming launch with the best weapon Earth has on its side, Master Chief." I'd take this one with a big helping of NaCl.

24 of 110 comments (clear)

  1. Probably won't make a difference by Kanpai · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The way i see people buy video games and consoles these days, gamers will simply rejoyce and buy both the PS3 and Halo 3 together. After all, they were going to get both of them eventually, same release date or not.

    1. Re:Probably won't make a difference by imitier · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Or, since Microsoft will print a zillion copies of Halo 3 and the PS3 is (knowing Sony) likely to be in short supply, gamers will get the PS3 first, and then calmly, at their leisure, get Halo 3. If this is true, it sounds like a recipe for rushing Bungie (by, in effect, letting Sony set the release date) and getting another game without an ending, or worse.

    2. Re:Probably won't make a difference by colman77 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Maybe, but...
      These things are NOT gonna be cheap! These consoles will probably launch with pricetags around $350-$400. At that rate, I know I won't be getting two, and when it comes down to it, I'll choose xbox over ps3 solely because of the Master Chief factor.

      <Halo 2 rant>
      "I'm gonna finish this fight." WHAT KIND OF AN ENDING IS THAT???
      </Halo 2 rant>

    3. Re:Probably won't make a difference by escher · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Any bets on if Halo 3 will end with the Master Chief about to Press The Button what Blows Up The Aliens and then it'll end and then we'll get Halo 4: Press The Button and Blow Up The Aliens?

    4. Re:Probably won't make a difference by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You're missing the point. TFA didn't say anything about Xbox360, NeXtBox, Xbox2, whatever launching the same time as the PS3.

      In fact, it's been estimated that the Xbox2 is due for release later this year, well before the PS3.

      Releasing Halo 3 at the same time as the PS3 is much different than releasing Xbox2/Halo3 at the same time as the PS3.

      People will already have the Xbox2, or those who did wait, will now choose: Halo 3 and Xbox2 or PS3 and... Kingdom Hearts 2.

      Spend $50 bucks on Halo 3 or $350 on PS3? That's the question.

    5. Re:Probably won't make a difference by badasscat · · Score: 3, Insightful

      If this is true, it sounds like a recipe for rushing Bungie (by, in effect, letting Sony set the release date) and getting another game without an ending, or worse.

      Come on, say it - it sounds to me like a recipe for disaster on MS's part, not just a recipe for rushing.

      Seriously, does MS expect that they're actually going to make a dent in PS3 sales on launch day? These are by nature early adopters, people who are willing to sit in lines for hours on end, willing to pay $300-$400 for a system just so they can hit the internet and tell everybody how l33t they are.

      At best, MS can hope for some residual sales from PS3 buyers who will also pick up Halo 3. But beyond that, a lot of Xbox-only owners will simply stay home on the PS3 launch day rather than deal with the crowds (those who really want Halo 3 can just order it online, and many will). The end result is going to be that the Halo 3 release will just get lost in the shuffle; can you remember what PS2 games were released on the day of the Xbox launch, or what Xbox games were released on the day of the GameCube launch? Every time a console is launched, one or another competitor (usually whoever's newest in the industry, and/or the most desperate) tries to pull out their big guns, and every time they fail miserably.

      MS is still learning. They're making all the same mistakes that their predecessors did before them. You don't try to take on a competitor directly on launch day. Not with a game, that's for sure, no matter how big of a game it is. For the experienced players in the market (which includes Sony now), a competitors' launch day is a time to lay low... everybody's gonna have their day in the sun, and there's really nothing you can do about it. It's in everybody's best interests to let a launch day be a launch day.

      The only way MS could hope to slow down PS3 launch day sales would be to launch Xbox 2 on the same day (though that's just robbing Peter to pay Paul, since it'd cut into their own sales too). Short of that and they're just committing market suicide with whatever they put out that week.

  2. Strangly early to anounce this by FidelCatsro · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It gives Sony plenty enough time to counter with a release title such as another a gran turismo or perhaps several other A1 titles, rather than holding off the big guns till initial sales dwindle .So this could infact end up hurting the sales of halo 3

    --
    The only things certain in war are Propaganda and Death. You can never be sure which is which though
    1. Re:Strangly early to anounce this by bigman2003 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Yeah..because Sony has a great track record of getting games like Gran Turismo delivered on time.

      --
      No reason to lie.
  3. WTF? by MagicDude · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It's designed to counter Sony's upcoming launch with the best weapon Earth has on its side, Master Chief. Go, John 117, go! Save Earth from Sony!

    Oh for fucks sake IGN, why don't you just glue your lips to Bill Gates' ass.

    Seriously though, are competing releases really a big deal for video games? I mean maybe it can be an issue on whether you want to spend your $300 on Revolution, PS3, or XBox 2. But one game is not going to derail the premere of a new system. It's not like movies where you're competing to get weekend and holiday crowds, since once those time frames are over, you lose a significant portion of potential customers and thus sales. Video games stay in stores for months. They compete with each other in terms of content and awesomeness, not in terms of who edges who out by a day or two.

    1. Re:WTF? by gl4ss · · Score: 2, Insightful

      then you should know that it can take just that 1 generation for the tables to turn.

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    2. Re:WTF? by SuiteSisterMary · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The Nintendo was the biggest console of the last generation. The Super Nintendo is the biggest console of this generation. Short of giving away Playstations, Sony is NOT going to undermine the launch of the Nintendo 64 unless Nintendo does something spectacularly stupid (like launch with only one game: Mario 64, and not have any others available for 6+ months) which isn't going to happen.

      Oh, wait....

      --
      Vintage computer games and RPG books available. Email me if you're interested.
    3. Re:WTF? by DeadScreenSky · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Um... no. The difference between my example and yours is this. My example assumes that the X-Box 2 is out there but not huge, and so they pull this stunt to try to undermine Sony's launch which would otherwise (and I say even if MS does this) huge.
      And that's why it's so silly, and why people are calling you on it. You have no reasonable way to guess that the Xbox2 will not be huge right now (we don't even have a launch date, real hardware specs, a list of launch games, or even knowledge of its controller). It very could 'pull a PS1', especially considering the massive momentum the Xbox 1 has in the US, Canada, and much of Europe right now.

      --
      There is no excellent beauty that hath not some strangeness in the proportion. -- Francis Bacon
  4. Re:It's simple by superpulpsicle · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Knowing Xbox had the shortest life cycle in the history of any successful console. I'd say Xbox2 will be in the market for almost 2 years before Xbox3 arrives.

    Another words you get a way better bang for your buck with PS3. Yes, I too agree Xbox will probably never win in Japan.

  5. so what? by torpor · · Score: 4, Insightful

    if we are expected to believe that halo3 is being used as an offensive weapon, why should we not be expected to believe that sony won't have a defensive strategy in place, which nobody knows about, which is to create another total kick-ass next-generation FPS that "putsches Cell", so to speak?

    its not like Halo itself isn't itself a total rip-off. you think sony can't rip-off too? duh, hello, the Halo Cult is well-known and well-respected.. and certainly not the first of its kind.

    this is just sensationalist tripe in a reactive market (gamers). grow up folks, its only a video game. the hardware, however, doesn't get made with pixie-dust ..

    --
    ; -- the corruption of government starts with its secrets. a truly free people keep no secrets. --
  6. Re:It's simple by Rousterfarian · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Glad to see I am not the only one amazed by this. PS2 = $299 for 6 years Xbox = $299 for 4 years PS2 was easily a better value.

  7. Re:But wasn't... by ivan256 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I know people I work with camped out before midnight in front of their local game shop to get the "special edition" version because they were going to be sold out. The EB near me still has 5 copies of the "limited" release on the shelf...

    Between that and the paid-for newscasts I really have to wonder how much of the Halo 2 hype was real, and how much Microsoft bought.

    How could anybody have possibly worried that they weren't going to be able to get a copy of Halo 2 on release day were it not for the FUD?

  8. Re:But wasn't... by UWC · · Score: 4, Insightful
    The thing is, just as Halo 1 introduced the console world to the LAN party, Halo 2 is now the driving force behind Internet multiplayer gaming on consoles right now. There are countless hours of play time beyond what is apparently an underwhelming single player experience. And yeah, I know there were many Live-enabled games before Halo 2, but Live subscription rates surged dramatically at Halo 2's release.

    The problem now is figuring out if there's anything new that Halo 3 can bring to the table other than a conclusion of the story and improved graphics (I guess we're all assuming this will be on the next XBox?).

  9. Re:It's simple by Babbster · · Score: 3, Insightful
    Perspective: $300 over four years is $6.25/month. If that's too much money for you, I can only suggest one thing: Get a friggin' job.

    I have all three consoles but this nonsense about Xbox somehow being a bad deal because its time from introduction to new console is too short is ridiculous on its face...not to mention the fact that anybody who bought EITHER the PS2 or the Xbox at launch was a tool of the evil marketing drones. The PS2 launch lineup was a horror and the Xbox had ONE decent game (personally, I'm not a big Halo fan so I wasn't even up for that). At the time of the PS2's release, you could have bought a Dreamcast and a few GOOD games for the same price (or, if you already had the DC, you could have just bought a bunch of good games).

  10. Of course Halo 3 is in the works.... by HiredMan · · Score: 1, Insightful

    that's why Halo 2 sucked. Well, that's why the "story" sucked.

    Remember the original story line shown at the preview?
    "You're defending Earth in a last ditch stand against the horror!"
    Now notice the cut scenes that made no sense and then suddenly the story plot is left open ended?

    Bungie was ready to conclude the Halo story with 2 and move onto something new (as the did with their other story lines) but Microsoft insisted that there be a Halo 3 for XBox 2. Against Bungie's wishes the plot was changed from a concluding chapter to a chapter 2 scenario which was clearly written by someone who didn't write the original. They threw out ALL interesting parts of the first story:
    -the Halo is an ancient one of a kind artifact - no, our bad there are a bunch of them.
    -the enemy is a mindless horror you can't reason with - oops now you can chat with them over AIM anytime after 6.

    Check out how many Bungie personnel from the original group that transfered to Microsoft are still around. The ones who quit and refused to move over to Microsoft originally were the smart ones.

    =tkk

  11. I bought Halo2 for multiplayer by CrazyJim1 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I liked it at first, but it really seems like some element of depth is missing.

  12. it's about awareness by Alban · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It's not about halo3 changing someone's mind about buying a ps3.

    Did you see the marketing campaign for halo2? It was almost like a new console was being released.

    Now think about it. No matter when halo3 comes out, Microsoft will back it up with a huge marketing campaign. So why not make it coincide with the ps3's release? This way, halo3's marketing campaign will accomplish two things:

    1) sell a ton of halo3 copies, which is the goal of any marketing campaign.
    2) burry sony's marketing campaign under their own.

  13. Re:Huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    However, you're right on the final point -- you can't sell a "gaijin" console in Japan.

    Er... "gaijin" means "foreign person". It cannot be applied to electrical appliances. The word you're probably not looking for (but I'm going to give you it anyway) is "gaikokusei".

    Your claim is somewhat dodgy apart from that. In the 1970s, nobody thought you'd ever be able to sell Japanese cars in America. The American auto makers were thought to be completely safe from foreign competition. Hmm.

  14. Did you even play Halo2? by MMaestro · · Score: 3, Insightful
    On the first mission the humans are LOSING and the covenant aren't even using their main fleet. Two space stations down (at least), countless ships lost (theres at least one fleet in the area but a covenant ship still breaks through...), and nearly every marine on the Cairo (the station you're on) is killed. Uh yeah, I'd say the human race is getting fu*ked.

    Halo was never a 'one of the kind artifact'. They tell you that in Halo 1. Its in a cutscene, you can't miss it.

    The covenant was NEVER 'a mindless horror', try reading the manual. It was also implied that the Flood had intelligence in Halo 1 as well (they wielded rocket launchers). In one of the levels Cortana even tells you that the Flood tried to escape Halo by sneaking onboard the disabled covenant cruiser before it launched.

    Either you played through both games with the sound off all the way, or you're just ignorant considering some of these facts are repeated numerous times through the game.

  15. Re:It's simple by unclethursday · · Score: 2, Insightful
    My own experience has been:

    PS2: $300, died a year and a half later with constant Disc Read Errors on any disk put in it, finally bought a slim PS2 for $150 a few months back to replace it after borrowing my friend's for over a year and a half (since he never played it). 4 Memeory cards at @$20 each: $80. Total Price: $530.

    Xbox: $200 (bought well after launch, just two weeks before the JSRF bundle was announced) plus $150 total on XBL ($50 on XBL launch, $50 after first year, another $50 this year). Has a POS Thomson drive in it, the drive is now so bad it barely reads anything anymore. MS wants $80 plus shipping to fix it, which will be better for me than buying a new one and losing all my game saves. Total price after I send it in for repairs: $420+shipping costs, $280+shipping costs if we don't count XBL costs.

    GameCube: $200, launch day unit, no problems. 2 memeory cards at $20 each. Total cost: $240.

    As far as not counting the game costs, or controller costs (I've had to replace 2 Xbox controllers so far because they just decide to stop reading when I pull down on the left analog stick sometimes, and 1 GC controller that got thrown to the ground and the A button stopped working), by your logic, the GameCube has been my best value. I spent less for it than my original PS2, and have had it longer than my Xbox, yet it hasn't cost me any extra money because of disk drive problems.

    And I'm not the only one who has had bad experiences with Sony's shoddy disk drives, they did lose a class action lawsuit that forces them to fix or replace any PS2 with Disc Read Erors for free, after all. And I'm also not the only one who has had problems with Microsoft's use of Thomson DVD drives in older Xboxes, either. Google Xobx Thomson problems and see how many hits you get. I'll give you a hint on that one, Google says "about 49,800" hits.

    The PS2 has hardly been a "better value" for me, or for the thousands of others who have had it die in less than two years of use because Sony's QA has gone to shit over the past decade or so for consumer electronics.