Slashdot Mirror


Terra Soft Offers Linux-booting iPods, FW Drives

Kai Staats of Terra Soft writes "We are pleased to now offer support for bootable iPods and FireWire drives, enabling a highly portable Linux on PowerPC environment." Note that this is about booting a Macintosh into Linux, not running Linux on the iPod.

13 of 351 comments (clear)

  1. Re:Just hardware, no apple OS. by elleomea · · Score: 3, Interesting

    You can make use of WINE in conjunction with QEMU to achieve execution of x86 Windows binaries on a PPC.

  2. Re:Just hardware, no apple OS. by RevAaron · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Wise remark. Like it or not - apple hw, without max os x isn't a mac.

    It's just another linux machine with that horrible X thing on it. :P


    Like it or not, but that isn't the case.

    Recently, I've been considering buying a new laptop. I last had an iBook G3/500, recently bequethed to my girlfriend, with me using a PDA/handheld as my main computer for the last year or so. So, thinking about getting another full laptop, I've been shopping around. But since I've had my fill of OS X, I was looking at PCs too, since I'd probably be fine on a PC running Windows or Linux. But I keep coming back to the Macs. With the quality of hardware, the size/weight factor it's hard to find a notebook of comparable price, one that isn't a big piece of junk.

    Saying that a Mac without OS X isn't a Mac just isn't true. There's more to a Mac than software. Most folks who think so have never used a Mac, not for any long period of time. Similarily, a PC running OS X isn't a Mac. Maybe an x86 machine produced by Apple could make it as one, though.

    --

    Working toward a usable PDA environment in the spirit of Newton OS: Dynapad
  3. Re:Just hardware, no apple OS. by lowrydr310 · · Score: 4, Interesting
    Is there anything better about running Linux on a PowerPC based system as opposed to an x86 system? Do people really go out and spend big bucks on Apple hardware just to run Linux?

  4. Re:Just hardware, no apple OS. by grahamlee · · Score: 3, Interesting
    Wine does not work on a non-intel system.

    Mind if I call bullshit?

  5. Re:Just hardware, no apple OS. by wealthychef · · Score: 4, Interesting
    It's just another linux machine with that horrible X thing on it. :P

    Troll-bait aside, as a Mac user running OS X at work and at home, I use X11 all the time. The only problem with OS X's windowing system, Aqua, is that it does not support remote windows. With "that horrible X thing," I can and routinely do open graphical windows spawned by applications on other machines running totally different operating systems. It is the only technology out there that does that that I have ever heard of. Even between macs, try opening iTunes on your home machine from your work machine. X11 is a useful application, not horrible at all.

    --
    Currently hooked on AMP
  6. Re:Just hardware, no apple OS. by swimmar132 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Can you get 5+ hours on the Pentium M laptops?

  7. Re:Just hardware, no apple OS. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    On my IBM ThinkPad T40, I've gotten around 6 hours on a single battery, playing DVDs. I've had only 1 Apple Powerbook, a G3 iBook with 14" screen. It could play DVDs around the same duration. As far as using the computer for development, compiling, coding, whatever else, just general use stuff, the iBook was far superior in battery life. The only thing that made the T40 superior is that I have 3 batteries for it, all paid for by my employer of course.

  8. Honest Question by American+AC+in+Paris · · Score: 2, Interesting
    I honestly wish Terra Soft the best of luck with this venture, but I can't help but wonder how large market is going to be.

    Setting aside the "because I can" and "because it's Linux" arguments, what is the benefit of running YDL instead of OS X on one's Mac?

    --

    Obliteracy: Words with explosions

    1. Re:Honest Question by humina · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Unfortunately the lack of an airport driver is the main reason I have not gone with Linux on my Mac. I prefer a 100% open source operating system instead of apple's open source darwin/closed source aqua. That and I can't check homestarrunner.com cause there's no open source flash viewer and macromedia won't release ppc closed source compatible version.

      --
      check out the best blog ever:
      http://oehlberg.com
  9. Maybe a highly portable Mac by MBraynard · · Score: 4, Interesting

    My flatmates powerbook blew out the harddrive. In order to do it on the cheap and still make the machine useful, he is running OSX from his Ipod.

  10. iPod Linux by Joey+Patterson · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Note that this is about booting a Macintosh into Linux, not running Linux on the iPod. If you want to run Linux on your iPod, check out iPodLinux.org.

  11. Re:Just hardware, no apple OS. by boots@work · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Again, so what? A G5 probably won't boot a five year old Linux distribution either. My new i386 laptop probably wouldn't boot a three-year-old copy of either windows or linux, because of its crazy hardware.

    My point is that the mere fact that a system started out on platform X says nothing about how well or poorly it will now support platform Y.

    Windows NT originally started out on an intel risc machine (i860). Sun started on m68k and is now on ultrasparc. HP-UX started on PA-RISC and is now primarily on ia64. PalmOS started on motorola m68881(?) and is now on ARM. Staying on the same set of processors over ten years is the exception.

  12. Re:One question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Despite the fact that this is Slashdot, Linux is also not the end all of OS's.