Slashdot Mirror


Forbes Lists Top Corporate Hate Web Sites

windowpain writes "You've seen them. Maybe you've made one, like Walmart-blows.com or Paypalsucks.com. Now Forbes.com has a 'Special Report' devoted to what it considers the best of them. 'The following nine sites--there were ten, but one went unexpectedly dark during the editing of this story--are the crème de la crème of online rage. Note that we substantially cleaned up some of the posts, editing out odd capitulation schemes, iffy grammar and plain incoherence. Apparently blinding anger does not go hand in hand with dotting your i's and crossing your t's.' Maybe this will become an annual thing like the Forbes 400 and the Fortune 500." (I wonder what a capitulation scheme is.)

38 of 456 comments (clear)

  1. Well... by inertia187 · · Score: 5, Funny

    I wonder what a capitulation scheme is.

    They probably meant "odd capitalization scheme." YoU THiNk, hUh?

    Actually, at first I read it as "odd copulation schemes," which makes a lot more sense, doesn't it? * fp

    --
    A programmer is a machine for converting coffee into code.
    1. Re:Well... by mog007 · · Score: 3, Funny

      I'm suprised sco.com isn't on the list.

      What? Oh you mean hate site, not HATED site. Gotcha.

    2. Re:Well... by hawk · · Score: 3, Funny
      I found that odd. Normally, slashdot doesn't need to find stories that *already* have grammar erros . . .

      :)
      hawk

    3. Re:Well... by ColaMan · · Score: 2, Funny

      I wonder what a capitulation scheme is.

      Ask the french.

      AHAHAHAHAHAH!! Man, that joke never gets old.

      It's probably an auto-suggest from their speel-checker:
      Speel-Checker: "No match for capitalpitalization - did you mean capitulation?"
      UserWithNoClue: "er, maybe... I guess speel-check knows best."
      (Clicks yes)

      --

      You are in a twisty maze of processor lines, all alike.
      There is a lot of hype here.
  2. Capitulation... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    That's what that last site that went dark did..

  3. Why Slashdot didn't make the cut by Neil+Blender · · Score: 5, Funny

    It's really a multi purpose hate site, hating so many things/companies. This list was more directed to sites that hated a single thing/company.

    1. Re:Why Slashdot didn't make the cut by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Yeah. I prefer sites that stick to hating one thing.

    2. Re:Why Slashdot didn't make the cut by PopeAlien · · Score: 2, Funny

      But what about slashdotsucks.com? I was curious, but I get a login prompt..

      I mean, how are we supposed to know if slashdot sucks or not?

  4. hmmmm by Munch671 · · Score: 3, Funny

    My company isn't listed yet......wait I mean (cough couch big brother) WHEW, my company isn't listed yet.

  5. forbes by gotem · · Score: 5, Funny

    how come there's not a 'forbes-sucks.com'?

    1. Re:forbes by Dun+Malg · · Score: 4, Funny
      how come there's not a 'forbes-sucks.com'?

      That's the tenth one that myseriously went dark.....muahahahaha!

      --
      If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
    2. Re:forbes by Jardine · · Score: 5, Funny

      how come there's not a 'forbes-sucks.com'?

      I expect it'll be registered pretty soon. Forbes actually does own "forbessucks.com"

      Apparently they're aware of their suckiness.

      If someone wanted to let the rest of the world know about Forbes' suckiness, forbesreallysucks.com and fuckforbes.com both seem to be available.

    3. Re:forbes by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 3, Funny

      I suggest we request the creation of a new TLD, ".suck", given the growing demand in this area (as outlined by TFA).

  6. hmm... by eobanb · · Score: 4, Funny

    I didn't notice an SBCsucks or an SBCblows. That's weird, because SBC really really sucks. Well, at least they did until one of their technicians accidently cut power to my high school. I love you, SBC! *Goes to register ilovesbc.com*

    --

    Take off every sig. For great justice.

    1. Re:hmm... by temojen · · Score: 5, Funny

      I didn't see electrolux sucks either.

  7. Where does one get a job like this ? by jephthah · · Score: 5, Funny

    To honor these quixotic champions, we spent hours trawling the Web looking for the very best corporate hate sites.

    1. Re:Where does one get a job like this ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Obvoiusly, you've never have a gov't job.

      By your spelling and grammar, I see that you have.

      May I interest you in your own corporate hate site? ;)

  8. They didn't get my favourite by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    There's this great anti-Microsoft website that I visit, now and then.

    1. Re:They didn't get my favourite by piltdownman84 · · Score: 3, Funny

      My school use to give my entire department's email list to MS every year. So I use to get all this crap from Microsoft. I thought I'd be clever so for my third year I updated my school email to a fuckmicrosoft.com forwarding account. I thought this would stop M$ from sendin me an email every couple weeks. Sadly it didn't and for a year and a half, until a prof told me my email was inappropriate, i use to get Microsoft junkmail through that fuckmicrosoft account.

      Still pisses me off that my school would give my email address to companies. Of course I never got around to seeing if I could opt out, so I shouldn't complain too much.

  9. what about slashdot? by pedantic+bore · · Score: 4, Funny
    aka the 'SCO haters web site'?

    --
    Am I part of the core demographic for Swedish Fish?
    1. Re:what about slashdot? by eobanb · · Score: 4, Funny

      Why did you create this site?

      CmdrTaco: If there was any way to make a lot of money by posting the same article several times in the same day, I was going to discover that way.

      What would Microsoft/SCO/RIAA/whoever need to do for you to take down this site?

      Taco: For one, if they all stopped advertising on here, I'd have no source of revenue now, would I...

      Typical Post:

      CleverHandle1337 writes, CNET is reporting on a clear case of abuse of patent law, which is not unlike a slashdot story from yesterday. Insert unnecessary flamebait comment from slashdot admin here at end of article.

      --

      Take off every sig. For great justice.

    2. Re:what about slashdot? by pedantic+bore · · Score: 5, Funny
      Slashdot story topics:

      • Some geopolitical entity is considering wifi.
      • Windows has security flaws. Microsoft is evil.
      • Google did something. Therefore, they'll be doing something tangentially related soon. They're a refreshingly different kind of evil.
      • OMG, someone posted a release candidate for *BSD/*zilla/KDE/Gnome! God bless the OSS developers.
      • I have a stupid question and I want to see how many identical answers I can get.
      • Roland what's-his-name thinks this is news.
      • News for nerds
      • Stuff that matters
      --
      Am I part of the core demographic for Swedish Fish?
  10. They forgot... by IgD · · Score: 4, Funny

    Anti-slash.org!

    The site is outrageous. Apparenly a bunch of -1 posters got together and set it up. I think it's meant to be funny more than an attempt at serious criticism.

    1. Re:They forgot... by XFilesFMDS1013 · · Score: 4, Funny

      We are in jihad against the editors of slashdot. We will not stop until our demands our met. Until that time, we will conduct civil disobedience on slashdot by constantly pointing out the editors' transgressions and discrediting slashdot as a news site.

      Yes...news site, one that reports everyone else's news. Plus, "editors' transgressions"? WTF? Like posting dupes? I mean, come on, that's never happened. And if it did, I'm sure at least one person would post about it.

      And under demands, The editors show journalistic integrity in the production of slashdot.

      hehehe

  11. Re:How do they decide? by ArsenneLupin · · Score: 5, Funny
    Whether to go with 'sucks' or 'blows.'

    Depends on the product, I guess. Saying that a vacuum sucks would be a compliment. So it blows. For a similar reason, a badly broken hairdryer sucks...

    If Microsoft ever made a product that wouldn't suck, it would be a vacuum cleaner!

  12. Capitulation on Wikipedia by asoap · · Score: 3, Funny
    Capitulation according to wikipedia

    I guess this is the point where jokes about France start, or *cough* viet nam *cough*.

    --
    Treat me like a marketing stat, and I'll treat your movie like a series of ones and zeros
  13. propa gramer? by bairy · · Score: 3, Funny
    Note that we substantially cleaned up some of the posts, editing out odd capitulation schemes, iffy grammar and plain incoherence

    Perhaps one day Slashdot will steal some of those editors and do that with submissions - well, it's a dream anyway

    --


    Get paid to search..It's geniune and
  14. Re:nothing like a bit of rage by Gregg+Alan · · Score: 5, Funny

    I interviewed at UPS and we did a tour, a monitor fell off a conveyor belt. Everyone heard the tube pop, and the crash of glass, but one of the employees just tossed it back as if nothing had happened.

    That sucks, but the person that shipped these monitors should have put them in boxes.

    --
    Here before all but 8486 of you.
  15. Verizon's response is... odd. by loggia · · Score: 2, Funny

    "What's really pathetic is not Verizon but this sort of lame Web site..."

    This is as almost as good as T-Mobile saying last week that "The silver lining of this Paris Hilton thing is it is an opportunity for customers to take further steps to protect their data."

  16. Re:Walmart-blows Stats by SimplePaul · · Score: 2, Funny

    Yeah, to 42,003 after a few Slashdot readers actually read TFA ;)

  17. Caputization by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 2, Funny

    An "odd capitulation scheme" might go:

    1: Set up corporate hate website
    2: Demand payoff to comply with corporate "Cease and Desist" order
    3: PROFIT!
    4: Go unexpectedly dark during editing of Forbes article about you

    This is not to be confused with an "odd capitalization scheme", except by your shady accountant.

    --

    --
    make install -not war

  18. Re:How do they decide? by lucabrasi999 · · Score: 3, Funny
    Are there corporate entities so bad they simultaneously suck and blow?

    Reminds me of the old joke:

    "--INSERT CORPORATE NAME HERE-- is like a fan. On one hand, they suck. On the other, they blow."

    Well, it's sort of a joke....

  19. Funny Forbes by Afrosheen · · Score: 2, Funny

    They bag on the sites for using poor grammar and yet, first paragraph in, we get this little gem:

    "But while your average disgruntled consumer simply vents their bile by bellowing at a bewildered service rep, a few go farther. Much farther."

    Farther? Much farther? In my native language, we'd use further. Oh, and I speak English. You do have to appreciate the writer's use of syncopation though, bile bellowing and bewildered are nearly poetic in that sequence.

  20. Re:Chrysler and Epinions by Chosen+Reject · · Score: 3, Funny

    Excting even though they are unreliable? Is that because you get all excited not knowing if the steering wheel will work while driving a 4000 lb. truck 75 mph on a freeway with a turn coming up?

    --
    Stop Global Warming!
    Just say no to irreversible processes!
  21. Re:Chrysler and Epinions by Esion+Modnar · · Score: 2, Funny
    I could create a website with all of the documentation.

    On a related thought, I was considering buying some $400 HP or Dell piece-of-shit, loading AdAware and SpyBot on it, then taking screen captures of all the crap these programs find on these boxes before they're even hooked to the Net. Then post these results to a web page for my customers to see. Unfortunately, if I mentioned that I got these results on an HP or Dell, or whatever, I'd be litigated into the dirt. My pockets are nowhere near as deep as theirs.

    My gripe is that these companies pre-load stuff like Wild Tangent and other gems, give you a Recovery CD (and only if you are thoughtful enough to ask for it, most are not), and do NOT give you a real copy of Windows so you can take it down to bare metal (format c:, reinstall) the second you get it. (And yes, I use Linux, but some people still won't go near it, justified or not.)

    I'm still going to do this, unless somebody else out there already has (?), but say something like: "Screenshot of AdAware on a virgin (rhymes with Hell) computer." Or something similar for HP or other mass-market computer company.

    Reminds me of the comedian who, in his act, was saying something nasty about an insurance company, and he wouldn't use their name explicity, but he said instead, holding his hands cupped together palms up: "...but I thought I was in good hands."

    --

    They say the first thing to go is your penis. Well, it's either that or your brain. I forget which...
  22. Re:copulation scheme by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    If you're using two AA batteries, it's overdesigned. One AAA ought to do the trick.

  23. Re:Why Slashdot didn't make the cut -OT by cgenman · · Score: 4, Funny

    A lot of it has to do with tone. If you take a somewhat original but firm stance which sounds intelligent enough to get somebody agreeing with you, you will be modded up. Look at the page a few days ago on the Harvard acceptance letter scandal. Lots of people took the very un-Slashdot opinion that the students who followed an unpublished URL deserved to get canned. They were modded up, because they spoke calmly and sounded intelligent.

    They also masked a moral argument as an intellectual one, which seems to help these days.

    Also, respond to the first thread. If you're not near the top of the page you're less likely to be read by a moderator who shares your opinion. Don't respond to the middle of a thread... only to the first or last comment in a string. People don't read the alternate middle comments.

    And I may get modded down for saying this, but saying you may get modded down for saying something just doesn't draw the mod points like it used to.

    Your post won't be moderated as "Offtopic" if you add "-OT" to your subject line. Feel free to try this with "Flamebait."

    These days, Simpsons quotes need to be longer than 6 lines to really draw the freebies.

    CmdrTaco and friends are a lot less likely to use the beatdown stick for talking about Slashdot. For some reason, talking about Slashdot draws mod points too. But don't draw too many, or you'll be Offtopic.

    The first rule of Slashdot is that you don't quote Fight Club.
    The second rule of Slashdot is that you don't quote Fight Club.

    Goatse and In Soviet Russia are so old that some people haven't even heard of them. Take advantage of this fact.

    Recycle previous posts that have been moderated up.

    Make humorous light of other poster's spellings, or use witty misspellings in your posts. I don't know why, but for the past few months the moderators seem to have B.S.'s in English.

    Punctuate your remark with one unashamedly unmasked swearword. But use only one, otherwise it's just too much of this shit.

    And, of course, if you can say something because you have actual information or insight to share, that's good too. But let's be real, this is Slashdot.

    Did I mention that Slashdot bashing works too?

  24. Re:The majority of states have no such law by rock_climbing_guy · · Score: 2, Funny
    Alright, you've just reminded me of an off-topic joke that I'm going to get modded to hell for, but here it is:

    A white man walks into a bar and sits down between a black man and an Indian. The Indian takes a drink, sighs, and says "Long ago we were many in this land, but now we are few." The black man takes a drink and says, "Long ago we were few in this land, but now we are many." The white man says, "That's because we haven't played cowboys and niggers yet!"

    --
    Wh47 d1d j00 541, 31337 15n't t3h r0xor5 ne m0r3???