Slashdot Mirror


LinuxPPC64 Contest

Robert MacFarlan writes: "IBM is sponsoring a Open Source developer contest for their Linux on POWER (Linux PPC 64) effort. The contest is designed to award and showcase innovative new open source applications that are designed or optimized specifically for Linux running on the PPC architecture. The contest also awards ports of existing applications from a predetermined list. Contest prizes include Segway HTs, Apple Power Mac G5s, and cash awards. "

25 of 184 comments (clear)

  1. Re:...What? by Avyakata · · Score: 2, Informative

    They realized it was a dupe and decided to do away with it...executioner style...*cough*

  2. Re:Apple? by tehshen · · Score: 2, Informative

    If you look at the topic list, it's in 'Hardware (Apple)', so it's in Apple.

    --
    Guy asked me for a quarter for a cup of coffee. So I bit him.
  3. Re:...What? by jawtheshark · · Score: 2, Informative

    Perhaps because it would have been a dupe?
    For a change the mysterious future worked! :-)

    --
    Ahhh...the great dumpster continuum. Many a free computer will be found there. -- sowth (748135)
  4. Re:Apple? by remahl · · Score: 3, Informative

    But it isn't Apple hardware! It's all IBM. It's not even PPC, it's POWER, which Apple doesn't use.

  5. Re:Porting wine? by TheRaven64 · · Score: 4, Informative

    The Darwine project has winelib running on OS X, and aims to tie QEMU to WINE to allow windows apps to run with the binaries in the emulated environments and the wine calls running on the native platform.

    --
    I am TheRaven on Soylent News
  6. Re:"POWER" by Seehund · · Score: 4, Informative

    POWER is an acronym. "Performance Optimization With Enhanced RISC", IIRC.

    Now go shout at the eejits who shout "MAC" when referring to cute plastic from Apple, Inc. ;)

    --
    Help savingAmigaOS and a free PowerPC market
  7. no no no, June 2005 by acomj · · Score: 4, Informative

    Read the article. Entries due by June 2005.. Registration Now..

    Who is moding around here...???

    1. Re:no no no, June 2005 by Coryoth · · Score: 3, Informative

      This article appeared in the Apple section early today, then vanished. It has now reappeared in the developers section with most of the old comments (and moderation) still attached.

      Why does this matter? Because the first incarnation of the article linked to the previous Linux on POWER contest which closed in 2004 and was simply announcing winners. Presumably the Slashdot editors noticed (who would have thought), pulled it, corrected it, and reposted it. Unfortunately all the comments bitching about it that got (reasonably enough at the time) modded up are also still attached.

      Ah well, this is Slashdot after all.

      Jedidiah.

  8. Re:Open to US residents only by dilby · · Score: 5, Informative
    --
    This post patent pending.
  9. Re:thinking of joining? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative
    http://www.linuxonpower.com/faq.php

    Straight out of the FAQ:
    What if I don't have access to a LinuxPPC64 machine to do a port?

    There are community-based LinuxPPC64 machines available.
    The University of Portland School of Engineering. Please see: http://www.egr.up.edu to register for an account
    The University of Augsburg (Germany). Please see: http://tuxppc.rz.uni-augsburg.de to register for an account.
    Apple Power Mac G5s are based on an IBM processor and work fine for porting activities as do many of the newer G4-based systems.
  10. Re:Taxable income? by ocelotbob · · Score: 3, Informative

    Just like game show winnings, the prizes are considered taxable income.

    --

    Marxism is the opiate of dumbasses

  11. Re:Apple? by Lars+T. · · Score: 2, Informative

    RTFA: "Linux running on the PPC architecture". I bet most people running Linux on PPC or POWER run it on Apple hardware.

    --

    Lars T.

    To the guy who modded me down from perfect to terrible Karma - Apple haters still suck

  12. Re:Open to US residents only by Inigo+Montoya · · Score: 5, Informative
    From cnews.canoe.ca:

    "While some companies permit Quebec entrants, many are scared away by unique rules that are mandated by the province's gaming agency.

    Quebec is the lone Canadian jurisdiction that requires security deposits, charges fees and enforces strict rules about draws valued at more than $100. Some American states also enforce rules that prevent their residents from participating in contests.

    In addition to requiring that all documents be written in French, Quebec's agency charges three per cent of the value of all national prizes, even if a Quebecer doesn't claim a prize, or 10 per cent of the value of a contest run exclusively in the province. The agency collected nearly $1.7 million in fees last year.

    In the rest of Canada, large contests are governed only by the federal Competition Act, a broad framework for promotional contests.

    "People often exclude Quebec just because they're afraid of these rules and don't really understand them," said Sharon Groom, a Toronto lawyer who represents many advertisers that run contests as a marketing tool.

    "They're not actually that bad but a lot of our clients will say we don't want to be bothered with doing this, so they exclude Quebec."

  13. Meta: Apple? IBM? Developers? by Lars+T. · · Score: 2, Informative

    In case somebody wonders about the Apple comments: this appeared in the Apple section yesterday (with an Apple G4 icon IIRC), but was moved to developers.slashdot.org. Which clears up another confusion: this is not a dupe.

    --

    Lars T.

    To the guy who modded me down from perfect to terrible Karma - Apple haters still suck

  14. Re:give us cheap Linux-based PPC machines by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    The Pegasos board runs Linux/ppc and MorphOS (an Amiga-like OS it seems) and others, although they don't seem to provide ppc970/G5s just yet. My bet it they would sell pretty well though..

    http://www.pegasosppc.com/

  15. Re:I Am An Engineer At University of Portland by goMac2500 · · Score: 2, Informative

    Sorry, a post higher up noted that IBM was recommending people go through University of Portland for access to a Power based development lab. If I were less tired I would have replied to the post noting that. :)

  16. Re:Porting wine? by TheRaven64 · · Score: 3, Informative
    Wine (and winelib) draws its own widgets, which look and behave the same way the Windows ones do. While, technically, it would be relatively easy to make them appear like native widgets, this would be a horrendous decision for two reasons:
    1. It would remove an important visual clue that the application in question is not a native application, and will not behave like one.
    2. It would encourage the attitude that having an app running in Wine is `good enough,' and make native ports (with UIs consistent with the rest of the system) less attractive to developers.
    --
    I am TheRaven on Soylent News
  17. Re:give us cheap Linux-based PPC machines by Johnny+Mnemonic · · Score: 3, Informative

    Though I don't pretend to understand what Apple thinks they are gaining by holding back things like full specs on the airport extreme card in my notebook

    They probably aren't allowed to do so by their agreement with Broadcom, the chip's manufacturer. I think you'll find that Broadcom hasn't released open information on any of their products, so their refusal to allow Apple to do so is in keeping with that position.

    So the question becomes: why doesn't Broadcom release info to allow Linux users to use their gear? Who knows. Or, why does Apple choose a manufacturer that refuses to play with OSS? That's probably due to a) historical reasons--the stuff is working now, so it's have to be re-engineered using a different source, and b) there's not enough interest for Linux-on-Apple to warrant the change.

    But the bottomline is that if Broadcom released their info, Apple would be more likely to follow their lead.

    --

    --
    $tar -xvf .sig.tar
  18. Re:G4? by FLAGGR · · Score: 2, Informative

    G4 != G5

    AFAIK, there are some of the G$ altivec instructions which will crash on the G5, which is why some OSX apps had to be ported. Plus, they want it for the POWER PPC64 architecture anyway, so no.

  19. Re:give us cheap Linux-based PPC machines by glitch0 · · Score: 4, Informative

    The Airport specs aren't being withheld by Apple, it's a Broadcom chipset which is proprietary.
    There's a petition for Broadcom to release opensource drivers on PetitionOnline.com.

    --
    -Glitch "We all know Linux is great...it does infinite loops in 5 seconds." - Linus Torvalds
  20. Re:give us cheap Linux-based PPC machines by sapbasisnerd · · Score: 2, Informative
    This one:

    http://www-1.ibm.com/servers/eserver/openpower/har dware/710_browse.html

    Is cheaper for the entry config which is significantly beefier than the entry 720. Also keep in mind that there are even cheaper configs possible if you buy through a human salesperson at IBM or a dealer. Supposed entry price for these machines (I haven't seen the details but I assume it's like the entry 720, (only 512MB RAM, 1.5Ghz CPU and smaller disks) is US$3,000.

  21. Re:Contest already over... by Mr.+Sketch · · Score: 2, Informative

    That may be kinda difficult since the front page says:
    Registration begins on March 15, 2005!
    Entries are due by July 15, 2005!

  22. IBM OpenPower Linux server line by browncs · · Score: 2, Informative

    The correct URL for the OpenPower line is:

    http://www-1.ibm.com/servers/eserver/openpower/

    Click Here

  23. Re:Apple? by FidelCatsro · · Score: 2, Informative

    ;) you do know thez have been avaliable for a couple years now
    url:http://www.eyetech.co.uk/search.php?Searc hStr= &SearchCat=AMA1>

    --
    The only things certain in war are Propaganda and Death. You can never be sure which is which though
  24. Broadcom hasn't released open information by bani · · Score: 3, Informative

    Broadcom hasn't released open information on any of their products.

    not true. not only have they released information on their gigabit ethernet chips, they also contributed drivers to the kernel.

    their wireless stuff is another story, iirc broadcom is under NDA due to some of the technology and core logic they licensed from others.