Slashdot Mirror


1.4mm Thick Gigabit Ethernet Cable

TheIonix writes "Flat network cables aren't anything new, but I'm pretty sure ones like this are. Japanese accessory king Elecom today announced the "LD-VAPF/SV05" network cabling, coming in at 1.4mm thick." Also here's their press release if you can read Japanese.

44 of 235 comments (clear)

  1. Flatwire by Jjeff1 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I'm not sure if it's out yet or not, but Flatwire has talked about this at least a year ago.

    1. Re:Flatwire by Jjeff1 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Shame on me for responding to my own post, but I wanted to note that DeCorp also makes that flatwire product for audio, video and electrical wiring as well.

    2. Re:Flatwire by megaversal · · Score: 5, Informative

      Last year (during summer) when I was in Japan, I bought a bunch of Elecom cables (CAT6 though, but the same thin design). They also sold CAT5 (10/100) cable at the same store I got my CAT6, so I'm assuming the real "news" is that they now have gigabit-capable CAT5 cable in the thin variety, not that flat cable is something new, or that even gigabit varieties of flat cable are new.

      --
      Sig!
  2. Translated Page by bigtallmofo · · Score: 5, Informative

    Google Translation of press release.

    --
    I'm a big tall mofo.
    1. Re:Translated Page by lpangelrob2 · · Score: 2, Funny

      The translation was ?????? and didn't really tell me more than I could've figured ??????, but I do have to say that the picture of the cable in the window was ?????? cool... although I'm not sure what happens to ?????? when you start running cat-5 cable outside. Could I use it to theoretically hook up a weather station outside to my ?????? inside?

    2. Re:Translated Page by wcrowe · · Score: 3, Funny

      "All your 1000Base-T are belong to us."

      --
      Proverbs 21:19
    3. Re:Translated Page by artemis67 · · Score: 2, Funny

      1) Japanese web page
      2) Google translator
      3) ??????
      4) Profit!

  3. RE: Coolness... by fshalor · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Can't wait to see them bringing down the ceilings in old campus buildings. (We always run stuff in the plenum. :) 0 )

    I'm still not sure I'm okay with the potential for interfreaence in these... it's just too thin... I'd love to see how many u can stack on top of one another before they break.

    --
    -=fshalor ::this post not spellchecked. move along::
  4. Useful by DarkSarin · · Score: 5, Interesting

    If the pics are accurate, and you can really shut the window (sorry I don't read Japanese), then this is some cool stuff. I can see it being used to hide cabling and make it less obtrusive.

    Other than that, they had better be selling it for close to normal cable prices, or I can't think of anyone who would buy very much of it.

    --
    "We don't know what we are doing, but we are doing it very carefully,..." Wherry, R.J. Personnel Psychology (1995)
    1. Re:Useful by Capt+James+McCarthy · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Sharp bends in your cable (closing a window on it) will degrade your throughput.

      --
      There are no loopholes. It's either legal or it's not.
  5. All fine and good by PDA_Boy · · Score: 5, Funny

    But surely a large file will not fit through such a small cable? You'd need to hammer them down first, which is an unwanted chore. Easier than making them small enough to transmit wirelessly, I guess.

    1. Re:All fine and good by slimak · · Score: 3, Funny

      its pretty easy to just keep ziping the files over and over until the result gets small enough -- even for large files (CD image or something) 5 times is generally enough for my needs.

    2. Re:All fine and good by dances+with+elks · · Score: 5, Funny

      the ones should be ok, they're quite thin but I'm just not sure about the zeros

      --
      Will wash cars for karma
    3. Re:All fine and good by corngrower · · Score: 4, Funny

      Just thread the wire through the zeros and slide them along the outside of the wire. They can't fall off. That's what I've been doing for some time now.

  6. Optical Fiber by kc0re · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I guess I don't understand what's the point in this article other than "informational". We have optical fiber cable in my office, it can't be any thicker than about 2 mm's.

    I really appreciate the fact that people are generating new technologies, to make things thinner, however, this is where stuff should be going, not groundbreaking news.

    1. Re:Optical Fiber by Minupla · · Score: 4, Informative

      It's interesting because fiber is pretty damned sensitive to things like going around corners and being run over with office chairs and a whole lot of other things can make it a challenge to deploy to the desktop. That's why gig over cat 5e is way more popular these days then over fibre. Outside of the machine room fibre isn't a popular solution. And definatly if you're going to run it around window tracks or under carpet with roller chairs, you don't want to use fib...

      Min

      --
      On the whole, I find that I prefer Slashdot posts to twitter ones because I don't get limited to 140 chars before
  7. The most important problem... by Jimpqfly · · Score: 3, Insightful

    ... is not thickness, it's the cable ITSELF I think... I'd rather see some important research on WIFI than this kind of invention...

    1. Re:The most important problem... by KyleJacobson · · Score: 2, Informative

      While WIFI would be good to expand on, some of us must use cable no matter what comes out. I work in a building where we can't have any wireless device, cell phones, pda, pages, tape recorders, etc... So cable like this can come in handy, especially when we are so limited.

      --
      I have worse karma than M$.
    2. Re:The most important problem... by AviLazar · · Score: 2, Funny

      Luckily for you, then, that we can do research on more then one field/topic at any given point and time so we have multiple technologies and choices.

      --

      I mod down so you can mod up. Your welcome.
  8. Re:Shielding? by KyleJacobson · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Im guessing they took that into consideration and have developed it to withstand physical damage and such. From the looks of it, it can be closed in a door and have no damage, and walked on with no damage. Hopefully you are wrong and they got this right so I can finally run cable from room to room and be able to close my door.

    --
    I have worse karma than M$.
  9. Re:Shielding? by gl4ss · · Score: 4, Interesting

    the whole point of making such announcement would be that you would have solved that shielding problem.

    the real novelty of this thing(if you watch the pics) is that you can run it through thin places(like windowstills.. no need to bore a hole to the wall).

    --
    world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
  10. Translation of press release by sczimme · · Score: 5, Funny


    "We are disrespectful to cable of girth. Can you see that we are serious? Join me or die. Can you do any less? For special lucky data, use Elecom LD-VAPF/SV05 network cabling."

    --
    I want to drag this out as long as possible. Bring me my protractor.
  11. UTP doesn't have shielding! by PornMaster · · Score: 5, Informative

    The U in UTP is Unshielded. Standard Ethernet doesn't use shielding. But it does use the twists in the cabling to combat interference.

    It looks like this flat cable is only for very small sections, for which you can probably get away without the twists if you've got another way to handle the interference.

    1. Re:UTP doesn't have shielding! by aaronl · · Score: 4, Informative

      It's not just to combat interference. The twists are done in such a way to also limit crosstalk, and use the reflections in the pairs to speed up data flow, limit the effect of external interferance, and allowing higher line bandwidth and better SNRs. Shielding might even mess this up by reflecting signal back into the strands.

    2. Re:UTP doesn't have shielding! by anethema · · Score: 4, Informative

      The reason the twists are done, is because on the Rx end of the cable, each pair goes into a differential amplifier. This amplifies the difference in voltages on the two lines. Any noise/crosstalk/etc common to the two lines doesnt get amplified. It actually gets nulled out by the Common Mode Rejection Ratio(CMRR) of the amp (60db or more usually).

      So, when you twist the wires together, you are ensuring that any noise that hits the wire, his both wires, in phase. This allows for very long runs. MANY techs work in this way. Nearly all serial techs, altough, some are implemented better than others.

      I have no idea what you're talking about with the 'reflections in the pairs speeding up data flow'. AFAIK that makes no sense at all. You never want reflections in a transmission line.

      --


      It's easier to fight for one's principles than to live up to them.
  12. Re:Shielding? by Broiler · · Score: 4, Insightful

    OK first off what is an Ethernet cable? You can not buy one at a store. You can buy a CAT5, CAT5E, CAT6...cable at nay computer store.
    Second twisted pair UTP)is not shielded. http://searchnetworking.techtarget.com/sDefinition /0,,sid7_gci213234,00.html/

    --
    My sigs offend the max # of people all over the world, regardless of race, religion, color, sex or creed. It's a gift.
  13. Wow! by RicochetRita · · Score: 4, Funny
    Now I'll be able to cram even more cables between rack'd components! Oh happy day!

    R3

    --
    Stuff that matters: circuitbreakers, vacuum-cleaners coffee makers, calculators generators, matching salt+pepper shakers
  14. Re:Shielding? by Gaewyn+L+Knight · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Most ethernet cable used today is UTP... which stands for 'Unshielded Twisted Pair'. Their is no 'EM protection' built into the cable other than the arrangement of the wires to prevent crosstalk in the individual strands.

    If they can provide enough 'twists' and correct pair placement then they can easily provide just as much protection as standard Cat-5/Cat-6 that we use today.

    PS People should also NOT use shielded twisted pair... in most environments it actually hurts signal quality do to it's jacket effectively being a single strand of conductor to pick up stray noise from 110V, ballasts, etc...

    --
    Telcos have alot of dark fibre in the States. Most people assume that's optical fibre...but it's actually moral fibre.
  15. Has existed for some time in TV applications by elgatozorbas · · Score: 3, Insightful
    Probably the purpose of this cable is to pass SHORT narrow sections, like the window shown. This also exists for TV applications e.g. to bring your satellite signal (dish on the roof) inside.

    I do not read Japanese, but can imagine

    1) this cable is rather expensive
    2) the loses/reflections are higher than for normal cable

    This is speculation, of course, but probably you don't want to make your entire home network from these cables...

  16. Thick ethernet? by gerardlt · · Score: 2, Funny

    Did anyone else read the subject and think "Thick Ethernet? What do we want to bring that back for?"

    --
    /* This sig is disabled. Press CTRL-W to enable. Thankyou */
  17. Re:Shielding? by afidel · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Well, if you are going to use STP you need to be using equipment designed for it. Equipment designed for STP needs to have a good ground plane and needs to bring that plane out to each port. Between the grounding of the jacket and the twisted pair STP cabling should not be worse performing that UTP, and in some environments is MUCH better. Of course in any invironment with enough RF noise to warrant STP I would just use fibre and not have to worry about the RF at all =)

    --
    There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
  18. Re: Coolness... by OldeTimeGeek · · Score: 3, Funny
    You won't have to worry about the dust. You can't use this anyway.

    The National Electrical Code requires that wiring in a plenum has a special teflon cladding that won't burn and fill the ducts with smoke in the case of a fire. I didn't see this mentioned in the article...

  19. Re:Wait a minute... by Enigma_Man · · Score: 3, Informative

    The twistedness actually is there to cancel out crosstalk. There isn't really any shielding for RF (either receiving or sending). The twistedness attempts to create pairs of wires that always appear to be 90 degrees in reference to the other wire. Any PCB designer knows that to get the least interference from lines, you try to cross them at 90 degrees, so they only "overlap" at a very small point. Parallel lines act like capacitors to eachother, and that's why we get crosstalk.

    -Jesse

    --
    Nothing says "unprofessional job" like wrinkles in your duct tape.
  20. Re:Shielding? by dickens · · Score: 2, Interesting

    It's not just crosstalk. Twisting improves "Common Mode Rejection" because the twists cause any interference to be picked up with opposite polarity on any signalling pair.

    Obviously, IANA EE.

  21. Re:Glass is thiner. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful
    I use fiber optic gigabit. Its far thiner then the stuff they're talking about.

    We are so proud of you. Now go roll over your fiber optic cable with a chair. Now bend it around corners. What? It doesn't work anymore?

  22. Beware - only Cat 5 by fedders · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I'm in the category cable industry and would be weary of using this cable for Gigabit Ethernet. The release only mentions that the cable is rated at Cat 5 (Not Cat 5e) which means it is only good for speeds up to 100 Mb/s. You need a true (verified) Cat 5e cable to run 1000 Mb/s (Gigabit) ethernet.

    That said, this would be find for most home networks.

  23. Re:Wait a minute... by Quantum+Fizz · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Any PCB designer knows that to get the least interference from lines, you try to cross them at 90 degrees, so they only "overlap" at a very small point.

    No, the twisted wires aren't twisted to cut capacitance between those two wires. It's the crosstalk between parallel channels that you want to cut down on. The twisted pair itself is basically a poor-man's transmission line, with characteristic impedance of 93 Ohm or thereabouts, depending on the twist pitch. Each twisted pair contains signal and ground (ie, it's return), and ideally should have zero net current flow within the pair (like coax). Ie, the current flow in the pair goes 'there and back again' for the signal/ground. By twisting them you effectively couple them together better, so they're less likely to crosstalk to the other pairs, either through capacitive or mutual inductuve coupling.

    While there is definitely capacitance between the two twister pair lines, there is a roughly constant mutual inductance that lets it approximate a tramsission line w/ real impedance (ie, no filtering to first order). This is how typical 50-Ohm and 75-Ohm Coax cable works too, but they're better shielded and have a better-defined characteristic impedance. (Ie, you can form a TEM wave in coax, but not so well in twisted pair).

    So by twisting you are forming a more-isolated transmission line channel, which will reduce crosstalk between the other twisted pairs, not between the two wires in the pair, as they are ultimately tied together.

  24. Re:Shielding? by ajs318 · · Score: 2, Informative

    Two conductors of small cross-section in intimate proximity carrying equal currents in opposite directions make a very poor antenna.

    Small cross-section isn't a problem. Opposite directions are easy to arrange: all you need is a resistor on the far end, bigger than the resistance of the cable {which depends on the cross-section; more area == less resistance}. Equal currents require differential drive arrangements {one goes high while other goes low -- think motor reversing circuit -- not hard} and that the terminating resistor on the far end is smaller than the input resistance of the receiver. {Spot the conflicting requirements here ..... the whole of engineering is really just about finding the best compromises between incompatible "ideal" requirements to produce a solution that will work under real-world conditions.}

    Intimate proximity is traditionally ensured by twisting the wires together, but bonding them side-by-side in a flat configuration works almost as well, if you can live with the fact that there is actually going to be some directional antenna functionality, but it's very directional.

    Twisting helps to cancel this out somewhat, by ensuring that any radiated fields tend to cancel one another out: somewhere further along the cable, a signal will be emitted with the opposite phase; and if the twists are close enough that the conductor is in intimate proximity to its opposite counterpart, the two will cancel out.

    Exactly how close is "intimate" depends on the wavelength, of course.

    --
    Je fume. Tu fumes. Nous fûmes!
  25. Big in Japan by rastakid · · Score: 2, Funny

    Ohhh, you're begin in Japan.. tonight! Big in Japan!

  26. Re:Wired vs. Wireless by CharlieHedlin · · Score: 2, Informative

    Well, wireless lans are at a much lower power output than cell phones, and they are typically operated much further from your brain (although with the wifi voip phones this doesn't apply).

    If you are worried about wireless, move to the mountains or put on a tinfoil hat.

  27. Re:Shielding? by InfiniteWisdom · · Score: 3, Insightful

    OK first off what is an Ethernet cable? You can not buy one at a store.

    A google search for "ethernet cable" finds 682,000 pages that disagree with you.

    By your argument, I guess you can't buy a car either... you can only buy a Honda Civic EX 1.5 5-sp Manual, Toyota Corolla CE 4-sp Auto etc.

  28. Re: Coolness... by Leebert · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The National Electrical Code requires that wiring in a plenum has a special teflon cladding that won't burn

    PVC itself is fairly fire retardant, but it releases Hydrogen Chloride when heat is applied to it. Plenum rated cable burns, but it doesn't release HCl when it does so, and thus is required to be used in environments where air will be circulated.

  29. Where you can get these cables by Shinzaburo · · Score: 3, Informative

    Just in case you are wondering where you can get these cables, they should be available for pre-order from our site within 24 hours:

    http://shinza.com/

    Availability is expected within 3-4 weeks.

  30. Rental unit? by Psychofreak · · Score: 2, Interesting

    If closing dors is a problem then I must assume that you live in a rental thatdoes not allow wiring to be pulled. Take a tri to your local home improvement store and look at what networking hardware is avaliable. For about US $100 I was able to pull 2 phone lines and 2 network drops to 3 bedrooms and the kitchen(8 new lines of both).

    Then only special tool I required was a fishtape. I already had the utility knife, drill with 3/4" spade bit, and screwdriver.

    The RJ-45 connectors that go into the wall do not require special tools to assemble. I still went to Radio Shack for patch cables. Home Depot charges 2x as much. I COULD have bought the connector tool and gone blind reciting "Orangewhite orange greenwhite blue bluewhite..." but the tool is almost US$50 for the cheep one!

    Since I am only using 2 of the drops I pulled (now at least) Getting the tool to make my own patch cables is too expensive. If I get more than 3 network devices at the same time I will probably get the tool and break even vs premade cables. That would be 6 new cables of various length.

    In any hoot, I'll have to upgrade way beyond my 4 port 10-base hub before that happens. The point is I'll be done, and never need to pull new cables again.

    Oh, per my eletrician consultant leave about a foot of slack in the wall at each end so you can replace the ends several times when they go bad without pulling new wire.

    Have fun!

    Phil

    --
    Laugh, it's good for you!