Slashdot Mirror


Microsoft Search Advertisers Get Personal

Alascom writes "According to this AP report, Microsoft is raising privacy concerns by allowing search advertisers to use personal information. Yusuf Mehdi, a corporate vice president with the MSN unit, said Microsoft has gathered this personal information by tracking users who have logged into its Hotmail e-mail program or other Microsoft Web sites in order to allow advertisers to target their ads to a specific audience."

24 of 185 comments (clear)

  1. Nothing new by suso · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Did you really expect anything less from Hotmail or Microsoft? I mean come on, this is a website that asks you (auto selected) if you want to subscribe to about 50+ different personalized newsletters when you sign up. I don't see how people can expect their privacy to be respected when the service is free.

    1. Re:Nothing new by frankthechicken · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Mostly agree, and if someone describes their individual wants and needs by signing up to the personalized newsletters, then I would guess they would appreciate some more personalized adverts, rather than requests to buy products they have no desire for. And would probably not recognise that they are being targetted in such a way.

      If you absolutely have to have adverts forced down your throat, then I'm sure the general public would prefer those adverts tailored for them.

    2. Re:Nothing new by naylor83 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Well, this is basically what Google is already doing, not?

    3. Re:Nothing new by dlZ · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I preper advertising to be tailored if I have to see it. I usually ignore it, but a good example of when it works was my better half wrote me an e-mail about some Hello Kitty stuff (she's a big collector)to my Gmail account. On the side where the ads are were a ton of things related to Hello Kitty, and I was in need of a present. I clicked, found a good deal, and made her very happy.

      --
      rm -rf ./evidence @ punkcomp
  2. Good by tobybuk · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Once people get a sniff that Microsoft is playing dirty in the search they have even less incentive to move from google.

    I say bring it on.

  3. Personalised isnt a bad thing by scenestar · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The biggest problem with advertising reamins that products advertised are not interresting to me.

    I have yet to find a advert for cheap merch pressing or jobs for young webdesigners. Instead i get bombarded with ads for crazy frog ringtones.

    As long as they dont read my email line by line it's FINE with me

    --
    perpetually dwelling in the -1 pits
    1. Re:Personalised isnt a bad thing by Aidtopia · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Read carefully. This isn't just about targeting to certain demographics. They are also providing that specific but non-identifying demographic info back to the advertiser.

      Microsoft would then provide the company with detailed information about the demographics of the people who clicked on its ads.

      If I click one of these ads, Microsoft will report to the advertiser that the user clicking this ad is a 37-year old man in ZIP code 94542, and average household income in that ZIP code is $105,393. This report is the scary part.

      I wonder how specific they get with the birthday. After all, 87% of Americans can be uniquely identified from gender, birthday, and ZIP code. So is it really non-identifying data?

    2. Re:Personalised isnt a bad thing by Sparr0 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      To defend the parents' math, in case anyone has a 'that cant be right' knee jerk reaction:
      There are something on the order of 20000 people in each zip code. Gender cuts that in half, 10000. Assume average age is around 35, that gives us about 1 in every 13000 people with each birthday (more or less for different ages). This works out very close to the stated 87%.

  4. MSN has always been a privacy threat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting


    with their GUID server and attempts to make cookies cross domains [bugtraq] bypassing any security restrictions the browser has implemented, nice huh

    the answer is to just block all MSN sites, why micorosft are allowed to produce an OS and then re-direct users to its homepage by default (and average user doesnt know how to change their homepage), how anti-trust/competitives hasnt pulled them on it shows you what they can get away with

  5. People still use Hotmail? by bigtallmofo · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I've witnessed a mass-exodus from Hotmail in the last few months. Complaints range from:

    1. Being asked to type in a human-verifier code everytime you send an email
    2. Server Busy errors for hours or even days
    3. Account unavailable due to maintenance issues for hours or even days
    4. Horrible interface
    5. Spotty spam protection from everyone except the copious amount that Hotmail sends you

    I have a Hotmail account that's about 7 years old that I still check from time to time, but I can't imagine using it on a day-to-day basis.

    --
    I'm a big tall mofo.
  6. An international view by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I live in Sweden, where this sort of thing is illegal unless you ask your customer for permission first.

    Could this spell problems for Microsoft Sweden, or MS in any other (most likely european) country with the same laws?

    Yes, MS has registered and is using hotmail.se.

  7. Re:Welcome to the Future by cybrthng · · Score: 2, Interesting

    What you don't know about google and accept for whatever faith reasons you have is scary.

    Google has more data then we could ever dream up. What they do with it is often illegal for people to discuss because of agreements that are made between publishers & advertisers and 3rd parties they work with.

    Even ads here are tracked. I would be suprised of the partner of sites here don't use the data to define demographics and details of the customer and are part of the "value add" of marketing here.

  8. Re:Bogus! Money Quote Follows: by lukewarmfusion · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Followed up with exactly the same thing that Google, Yahoo!, and many other companies do:

    "For example, a car company could choose to have Microsoft display its sports car link when a man types in certain keywords, and a link to an SUV model when a woman uses the search criteria."

    Not a privacy concern. It's using the Internet's advantages to the benefit of 1) the advertiser and 2) the consumer (potentially).

    If I'm surfing for "SUV" then maybe I would rather see sponsored links for SUV companies rather than random, unrelated ads for shower gel. As an advertiser, I know that I can buy a billboard for n dollars and have no idea how many people drove by the billboard, made inquiries into my company as a result of the billboard, or became customers are a result of the billboard. With the Internet, I can do all of that - it lets me be a more informed advertiser, use my money more appropriately, and improve general service for customers.

  9. Re:Not really personal information... by chialea · · Score: 4, Interesting

    >Notice they aren't releasing any information (like your name, etc.) that would explicitly identify the person to the advertisers.

    There is some rather interesting research on this. Gender, age, and location is enough to identify most people, since, really, there are a limited number of people in each cartesian-type category. Note that this is different from aggregate data, which may be less personally identifiable, depending on how it's done.

    The people at the data privacy lab have gone through and identified people in "non-personally identifiable" information released by several sources. Part of the problem is that you can put these sources of data together with high confidence and both narrow down individual people and gather a LOT of information about them. I'm sure they have some papers up if you're interested:

    http://privacy.cs.cmu.edu/

    Lea

  10. Ah Slashdot.... by Saeed+al-Sahaf · · Score: 3, Interesting

    How is this any different than Google trolling through your email? Oh, it's not quite as bad, but since it's Microsoft, it's Pure Evil? And of course since Google is our Love Child, it's OK for them to do something that in reality is twice as offensive? Ah Slashdot....

    --
    "Who are in control, they are not in control of anything - they don't even control themselves!" - Glen Beck
  11. Targeted Ads by RagingChipmunk · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Who cares? Who actually uses MS "SEARCH" anyway? It sucks, and if they want it to suck even more, they'll incorporate 'targeted ads'. If they want to follow in the footsteps of AOL thats fine by me. They're going to be fighting AOL for a segment of "very large but mentally insignificant" web-users.

    --
    The only PT Boat Journal on the web: http://www.PT171.org
  12. Their privacy info. by blanks · · Score: 2, Interesting

    From their terms of service and privacy info.

    http://privacy1.msn.com/

    These are just random bits I collected that related to advertisers and personal information.

    Also you may want to read the pasport privacy link, as this is how msn connects all their sites.

    http://www.passport.net/Consumer/Privacy Policy.asp?PPlcid=2057

    At some sites, MSN collects personal information, such as your e-mail address, name, home or work address or telephone number. MSN may also collect demographic information, such as your post code, age, gender, preferences, interests and favorites. Information collected by MSN may be combined with information obtained from other Microsoft services and other companies

    The information we collect may be combined with information obtained from other Microsoft services and other companies.

    MSN may also place Web beacons from third parties on our site in order to compile aggregated statistics and to help determine the effectiveness of our joint promotional or advertising campaigns. MSN prohibits Web beacons on our site from being used by third parties to access your personal information.

    Use of Third Party Ad Networks

    The majority of the online banner advertisements you see on MSN Web pages are displayed by MSN.

    Your registration information is used to operate the site, for demographic statistics, and to display appropriate individualized advertisements.

    In addition, MSN allows other companies, called third-party ad servers or ad networks, to display advertisements on MSN Web pages. Some of these ad networks may place a persistent cookie on your computer. Doing this allows the ad network to recognize your computer each time they send you an online advertisement. In this way, ad networks may compile information about where you, or others who are using your computer, saw their advertisements and determine which ads are clicked on. This information allows an ad network to deliver targeted advertisements that they believe will be of most interest to you.

  13. Ooooh...they wanted my real information? by neckdeepinspecialsau · · Score: 3, Interesting
    Does anyone put real information into hotmail or yahoo mail services?

    If you do and you don't want to feel free to use my "real information":

    Bob Smith 1313 Mockingbirdlane Beverly Hills Califonia 90210 555-555-5555 (h) 555-555-5555 (c) alternate email ifjeufeiehhc@yahoo.com

    The real question is do they feel guilty charging for junk data?

    1. Re:Ooooh...they wanted my real information? by Alsee · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Oh, they don't make money selling the junk data. They make money selling RELIABLE data. Any website you go to can see your IP address and that IP address can be matched with the real-world area it serves. In US urban and suburban areas this will most often pin down your true location within a few miles. In rural areas and in other countries it can ususally pin people down within a several dozen miles.

      Just try this website to convert your IP to a real-world address. For me it reported one town over, about a mile away.

      -

      --
      - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
  14. Re:Not really personal information... by MoonChildCY · · Score: 2, Interesting

    You think your location is not considered information that can identify you? Granted, it depends on the resolution of the location information, but if they go under zip code (like zip+four) info, then this is indeed a violation of your privacy.

    Human Subjects Research guidelines crealy state that zip code from participants in a study are muddy water. Anything below that (zip+4), actual address, etc. is considered private information and written consent from the participant is required for the use of the data. Notice that a permission is required to USE the data. Even if you somehow have the data, you need written permission to use them. Yes yes, EULAs probably grant permission, I know.

  15. Re:Bogus! Money Quote Follows: by theVP · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I'm sorry, I know this is going to really piss some people off here at slashdot, but I actually LIKE those little ads on the sidebar that are specified to what I'm searching for. Especially when I'm attempting to find something I want to buy. There has been many a time when I'm trying to find something via Google, or I get an email special in my Gmail account, that the links on the side take me to something even better. Not all ads are neccessarily scams. I mean, its not like they're installing software on my computer, so I just really don't see the point in arguing over this. To me, it really ENHANCES my search for products more than it hinders.

    If Microsoft sees this, and they see that it'll bring in some more revenue, why SHOULDN'T they try something like this?

    --
    "No one is more miserable than the person who wills everything and can do nothing." -Emperor Claudius 10 BC - AD 54
  16. Re:Welcome to the Future by Otter · · Score: 2, Interesting
    What you don't know about google and accept for whatever faith reasons you have is scary.

    1) The Google TOS makes it clear that personally identifying information is not being shared. For the sake of argument, let's say that they're in compliance with it.

    2) If you look at the ad buying process, there is no hint that any targeting exists beyond immediate keywords. If they use such targeting, they don't charge for it.

    3) As long as #1 is in place, I don't particularly care whether they track aggregate searches per cookie -- I'm simply stating that they don't, to the best of my knowledge, serve ads based on search history. If I found that issue "scary", I'd look into it more deeply.

    Out of curiosity, if you're so frightened over this issue, you're doing exactly what to protect your secrecy? Hitting Google through proxies?

  17. Re:Nothing new here. by Joules+Burn · · Score: 2, Interesting

    When a tv can report back to its master what channel I'm watching, when and for how long, my sole remaining tv will have a new home on the curbside.

  18. Re:Not really personal information... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    There are additional prohibitions to the gathering of PII (personally identifiable information), including not gathering demographics on a ZIP code with fewer than a certain number of people.

    Microsoft takes PII very seriously, and increasingly so. As an employee there, I had to take multiple courses on it, and the grunts took it very seriously. During the year I worked there (I quit to move into a different career) access to the MSN databases was tightened significantly.

    I know y'all love to hate Microsoft, but seeing it from an inside perspective, I find much of the anti-Microsoft commentary in this thread uninformed.