Slashdot Mirror


Microsoft Search Advertisers Get Personal

Alascom writes "According to this AP report, Microsoft is raising privacy concerns by allowing search advertisers to use personal information. Yusuf Mehdi, a corporate vice president with the MSN unit, said Microsoft has gathered this personal information by tracking users who have logged into its Hotmail e-mail program or other Microsoft Web sites in order to allow advertisers to target their ads to a specific audience."

20 of 185 comments (clear)

  1. Welcome to the Future by cybrthng · · Score: 4, Insightful

    And you don't think this happens anywhere else? Read the TOS of Google, Yahoo and many other websites you visit.

  2. Oh no! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Hotmail are using personal data to target ads. Microsoft suck!

    If only Google did this sort of thing with GMail. That'd be O.K, because they're Google. Google arn't evil, like those bastards at Microsoft.

  3. Re:Good by ack154 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Why would I have any incentive to move from Google anyways? They bring nothing new to the table that I'm interested in.

  4. Bogus! Money Quote Follows: by PHAEDRU5 · · Score: 1, Insightful

    From the article:

    "Microsoft's paid search platform will provide detailed -- but not personally identifiable -- information, such as gender, age and location, for many people who use its search engine, allowing advertisers to target their ads to a specific audience."

    Privacy concerns my ass. This is just one more "Micro$oft is the Devil!" scare story.

    --
    668: Neighbour of the Beast
  5. As per the /. norm... by bob670 · · Score: 2, Insightful
    this is turning in to an MS-bashfest, but what they are doing isn't far off from what Google and Yahoo do as well, using content from your mail or information from your account to target advertising? Maybe my tinfoil hat is just starting to chafe a little, but I don't think what Google, MSN or Yahoo does in regards to this stuff is really a big deal, at least not bigger a deal than what your credit card, bank or even insurance company do with similair information.

    I'm all for bashing MS, but if we call them on this let's not leave out our most sacred cow, Google.

  6. Re:Nothing new by suso · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I didn't mean anything free, I meant when its free from a company whose motivation is profit. Its not always true, but there is almost always a profit or information motive.

  7. Not really personal information... by TheNecromancer · · Score: 4, Insightful

    From the article:
    Microsoft's paid search platform will provide detailed -- but not personally identifiable -- information, such as gender, age and location, for many people who use its search engine, allowing advertisers to target their ads to a specific audience.

    Notice they aren't releasing any information (like your name, etc.) that would explicitly identify the person to the advertisers.

    I don't see a real problem with privacy here, it just looks like generalized demographic info that is useful to the advertisers.

    --
    Attention all planets of the Solar Federation! We have assumed control! - Neil Peart
  8. Privacy Schmivacy by Ridgelift · · Score: 4, Insightful

    FTA: "Microsoft's paid search platform will provide detailed -- but not personally identifiable -- information, such as gender, age and location, for many people who use its search engine, allowing advertisers to target their ads to a specific audience."

    Yeah, right. You target an ad to a person, they respond, and now you've got their age, location, etc. Once again the rights of the corporation outweight the rights of the individual.

  9. You expected privacy? by catdevnull · · Score: 4, Insightful

    OK, you signed up to use "free" e-mail from the largest corporate player known for it's less-than-ethical tactics and you expected to get something for nothing from Microsoft? Yikes, people. I refused from the get go. My gut said it was a gimmick.

    Nothing is ever free from a corporation--they've got people studying consumers to find out how to make a buck off of them. That's no conspiracy theory--it's just corporate life. That's why I work at an .EDU. [That and I'm a bit of a masochist].

    --

    I might know what I'm talkin' about, but then again, this is Slashdot...
    1. Re:You expected privacy? by Saeed+al-Sahaf · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Nothing is ever free from a corporation

      And this applies to Google and Gmail as well. Google trolls your email to "serve" you adverts. Of course, Google is a Slashdot Love Child, so it's kind of OK, sort of winked at. But Microsoft, on the other hand... Pure Evil for something that is half as half baked as the Google deal. Ah, Slashdot.... Full of hypocrisy.

      --
      "Who are in control, they are not in control of anything - they don't even control themselves!" - Glen Beck
  10. Re:Is it in the EULA ? by paulymer5 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Doesn't matter if you read it when you signed up. The good ol' ever present We-reserve-the-right-to-change-our-policy -at-any-time (read "the We-reserve-the-right-to-screw-you clause") means you're left with the option to agree with the new terms or stop using the service.

  11. Re:Nothing new by coolcold · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I would say, its free from a company with such a bad record at treating their customers and or their decision making criteria only have profit, profit and 5) PROFIT, would make this news into OldNewsIsSoExciting.jpg

    --
    I am harvesting funny/good quotes. Please help by putting them in your sigs :)
  12. Re:MSN has always been a privacy threat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    his is different than Firefox, Mozilla, Netscape, or Opera how?

    not a convicted monopoly
    don't have 95% of the PC market
    dont sell advertising or derive revenue from selling personal data to the highest bidder
    dont pass on unique identifiers to their "partners"
    dont attempt to avoid cookie security restrictions

    but thats all minor stuff right ?

  13. Who didn't see this coming? by StankDawg · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It could get scarier!

    I went into a discussion on Binary Revolution Radio (http://www.binrev.com/radio/) episode #80 about the possibility (or rather INEVITABILITY) of Microsoft combining all of its databases from all of its individual services (hotmail, MSDN, spaces, search, etc...) and data mining them for common data. Each individual privacy policy becomes meaningless. They may not sell your data, but they can combine it and put together a pretty powerful profile about you.

    The key, and the reason that I pointed it out on this episode, is the new Microsoft genuine program. All of the other databases could have been joined on names, phone numbers, and other PII (Personally Identifiable Information) which is not always reliable. With the new "genuine program" they get a hash of your system as part of the process that uniquely ties you to that computer.

    With one anchor like that that *is* reliable (most of the time) they now have a way to tie your visits to your accounts from that PC to all of your other MS service accounts. For example, logging into hotmail from that "marked" PC.

    It is not rock solid and may not be completely provable (people do use other peoples computers) but it will work most of the time. That is a very scary data warehouse that could provide extremely targeted advertising which would fetch top dollar from advertisers.

    --
    --- The revolution will be digitized! - http://www.binrev.com/ ---
  14. And? by tomstdenis · · Score: 4, Insightful

    How can you expect privacy when you're giving your info to another person?

    Microsoft didn't force you to login to hotmail. And the fact that you happen to have private information there is your own damn fault.

    It would be different if your ISP was giving out your emails or other details since you pay them for the service...

    And you really don't think Google isn't laughing at the stock of "private" information stored in their gmail archives?

    Tom

    --
    Someday, I'll have a real sig.
  15. GMail by northcat · · Score: 2, Insightful

    GMail placed context sensitive ads based on people's private emails. In competition (maybe not in direct competition, but still in competition) MSN is going a step further and doing this. In competition Google or someone else might go a step even further and do something even worse. That's why even a small case of invasion of privacy is bad -- it leads to competition in unhealthy areas and it gives more justification for bigger transgressions -- and that's why some of the hue and cry raised over gmail was justified. (And of course, there is also the justifiable argument that even a small case of invasion of privacy is not acceptable)

  16. Re:Ah Slashdot.... by aurumaeus · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Google doesn't "Troll" through your email. You get ads that are selected based on words that are, at display time, found to be present in whatever email you're looking at. It's annonymous, and not at all based on personal information (and yes, those are two different things). Of course, MSFT wouldn't be the first to target ads with user profile information.

  17. This is not what Google does... but it's been done by Old+Man+Kensey · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Google/Gmail displays ads based on keyword text. The advertiser knows nothing about you as a person, just that your search string/e-mail message contains certain words. Come to think of it, I don't remember ever giving Gmail any statistical info about myself. As far as I remember I just clicked the invite link I got in my e-mail and gave them my desired username and password.

    What Microsoft is doing is what AOL has done for years -- providing data on the actual person such as age, gender, and location. AOL users have an object called the "q_context" that follows them around (like a cookie) that contains basic demographic info about you, and display objects can use info in the q_context to do things like pop up your local weather in a field, or (presumably) an ad targeted at your age and gender as well as your location.

    This is nothing new, and it's really nothing all that bad, but it's still a lot more than Google does.

    --
    -- Old Man Kensey
  18. Microsoft would do something like this: by rice_burners_suck · · Score: 2, Insightful
    In my opinion, Microsoft should make a software activation scheme across all software they make, which would request every imaginable piece of identifying information about a person.

    For example, the system could force users to enter: Date of birth, ethnic affiliation, gender, sexual preference, social security number, driver license number, tax documents filed in the last 15 years, criminal records, photocopies of birth certificates, a list of current and past employers, amount of pay over a 10 year period, number of spouse and children, names, genders, social security numbers, and birth certificates of all family members, and the list goes on and on. It would take the average person a week to collect all of the information and to prepare all the documents for submission to Microsoft to activate a piece of software.

    This would be good for the economy because companies will pop up everywhere that will file for you, similarly to the way that tax preparation companies exist all over the place.

    But here's the best part: When the software is activated, Microsoft's systems would automatically verify all of the information with state and federal computer systems. Any incorrect information would be grounds for lawsuit and police action for fraud.

    Assuming you're not busted for fraud, Microsoft would then sell complete identifying information to advertisers and businesses of all kinds, especially businesses that nobody's ever heard of, which are not reputable, or businesses which are specifically shady and/or illegal. These businesses could then use the information to specifically target advertisements for individual potential customers. They could also enhance their revenue by stealing the identity of those who do not purchase their products, thereby taking advantage of their government-granted right to guaranteed profits from business activities. Microsoft would collect a 99% tax on these profits, to recompense it for building such a vast and complex system.

    Microsoft. Where do you want to go today?

  19. So? by Locke2005 · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Show of hands: who actually gave correct personal information when creating their hotmail accounts? Ok morons, you can put your hands down now!

    I feel a personal responsibility to put down as much erroneous and conflicting information as possible when filling out web forms. I'm pretty sure hotmail beleives that I am an 18 year old female virgin with an annual income of $0 whose name is Bill Gates and whose address is 1 Microsoft Way, Redmond, WA... yeah, that info should be really useful to potential advertisers!

    --
    I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.