Slashdot Mirror


Microsoft Search Advertisers Get Personal

Alascom writes "According to this AP report, Microsoft is raising privacy concerns by allowing search advertisers to use personal information. Yusuf Mehdi, a corporate vice president with the MSN unit, said Microsoft has gathered this personal information by tracking users who have logged into its Hotmail e-mail program or other Microsoft Web sites in order to allow advertisers to target their ads to a specific audience."

55 of 185 comments (clear)

  1. Nothing new by suso · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Did you really expect anything less from Hotmail or Microsoft? I mean come on, this is a website that asks you (auto selected) if you want to subscribe to about 50+ different personalized newsletters when you sign up. I don't see how people can expect their privacy to be respected when the service is free.

    1. Re:Nothing new by frankthechicken · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Mostly agree, and if someone describes their individual wants and needs by signing up to the personalized newsletters, then I would guess they would appreciate some more personalized adverts, rather than requests to buy products they have no desire for. And would probably not recognise that they are being targetted in such a way.

      If you absolutely have to have adverts forced down your throat, then I'm sure the general public would prefer those adverts tailored for them.

    2. Re:Nothing new by suso · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I didn't mean anything free, I meant when its free from a company whose motivation is profit. Its not always true, but there is almost always a profit or information motive.

    3. Re:Nothing new by coolcold · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I would say, its free from a company with such a bad record at treating their customers and or their decision making criteria only have profit, profit and 5) PROFIT, would make this news into OldNewsIsSoExciting.jpg

      --
      I am harvesting funny/good quotes. Please help by putting them in your sigs :)
    4. Re:Nothing new by naylor83 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Well, this is basically what Google is already doing, not?

    5. Re:Nothing new by dlZ · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I preper advertising to be tailored if I have to see it. I usually ignore it, but a good example of when it works was my better half wrote me an e-mail about some Hello Kitty stuff (she's a big collector)to my Gmail account. On the side where the ads are were a ton of things related to Hello Kitty, and I was in need of a present. I clicked, found a good deal, and made her very happy.

      --
      rm -rf ./evidence @ punkcomp
  2. Is it in the EULA ? by Chris+Kamel · · Score: 2, Funny

    I guess we should have read the license agreement....

    --
    The following statement is true
    The preceding statement is false
    1. Re:Is it in the EULA ? by paulymer5 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Doesn't matter if you read it when you signed up. The good ol' ever present We-reserve-the-right-to-change-our-policy -at-any-time (read "the We-reserve-the-right-to-screw-you clause") means you're left with the option to agree with the new terms or stop using the service.

  3. Good by tobybuk · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Once people get a sniff that Microsoft is playing dirty in the search they have even less incentive to move from google.

    I say bring it on.

    1. Re:Good by ack154 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Why would I have any incentive to move from Google anyways? They bring nothing new to the table that I'm interested in.

  4. Welcome to the Future by cybrthng · · Score: 4, Insightful

    And you don't think this happens anywhere else? Read the TOS of Google, Yahoo and many other websites you visit.

    1. Re:Welcome to the Future by cybrthng · · Score: 2, Interesting

      What you don't know about google and accept for whatever faith reasons you have is scary.

      Google has more data then we could ever dream up. What they do with it is often illegal for people to discuss because of agreements that are made between publishers & advertisers and 3rd parties they work with.

      Even ads here are tracked. I would be suprised of the partner of sites here don't use the data to define demographics and details of the customer and are part of the "value add" of marketing here.

    2. Re:Welcome to the Future by Otter · · Score: 2, Interesting
      What you don't know about google and accept for whatever faith reasons you have is scary.

      1) The Google TOS makes it clear that personally identifying information is not being shared. For the sake of argument, let's say that they're in compliance with it.

      2) If you look at the ad buying process, there is no hint that any targeting exists beyond immediate keywords. If they use such targeting, they don't charge for it.

      3) As long as #1 is in place, I don't particularly care whether they track aggregate searches per cookie -- I'm simply stating that they don't, to the best of my knowledge, serve ads based on search history. If I found that issue "scary", I'd look into it more deeply.

      Out of curiosity, if you're so frightened over this issue, you're doing exactly what to protect your secrecy? Hitting Google through proxies?

  5. Oh no! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Hotmail are using personal data to target ads. Microsoft suck!

    If only Google did this sort of thing with GMail. That'd be O.K, because they're Google. Google arn't evil, like those bastards at Microsoft.

  6. This is really scary! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    I got some really scary ads that have been keeping me up at night! How do they know I HAVE A SMALL PENIS! OMG this is a travesty. I should have given them a fake zip code and should have lied about my penis size on the questionnaire.

    1. Re:This is really scary! by jacksonj04 · · Score: 4, Funny

      On the other end of the scale, they seem to want me to walk around with an 11" penis, DD breasts and a remortgage on my russian bride.

      --
      How many people can read hex if only you and dead people can read hex?
  7. Personalised isnt a bad thing by scenestar · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The biggest problem with advertising reamins that products advertised are not interresting to me.

    I have yet to find a advert for cheap merch pressing or jobs for young webdesigners. Instead i get bombarded with ads for crazy frog ringtones.

    As long as they dont read my email line by line it's FINE with me

    --
    perpetually dwelling in the -1 pits
    1. Re:Personalised isnt a bad thing by Aidtopia · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Read carefully. This isn't just about targeting to certain demographics. They are also providing that specific but non-identifying demographic info back to the advertiser.

      Microsoft would then provide the company with detailed information about the demographics of the people who clicked on its ads.

      If I click one of these ads, Microsoft will report to the advertiser that the user clicking this ad is a 37-year old man in ZIP code 94542, and average household income in that ZIP code is $105,393. This report is the scary part.

      I wonder how specific they get with the birthday. After all, 87% of Americans can be uniquely identified from gender, birthday, and ZIP code. So is it really non-identifying data?

    2. Re:Personalised isnt a bad thing by Sparr0 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      To defend the parents' math, in case anyone has a 'that cant be right' knee jerk reaction:
      There are something on the order of 20000 people in each zip code. Gender cuts that in half, 10000. Assume average age is around 35, that gives us about 1 in every 13000 people with each birthday (more or less for different ages). This works out very close to the stated 87%.

  8. targeted advertising by justforaday · · Score: 2, Funny

    Targeted advertising? Wow, that Microsoft sure does always seem to innovate...

    --
    I'll turn into a supernova and burn up everything. Well I'll turn into a black little hole and you'll turn into string.
  9. As per the /. norm... by bob670 · · Score: 2, Insightful
    this is turning in to an MS-bashfest, but what they are doing isn't far off from what Google and Yahoo do as well, using content from your mail or information from your account to target advertising? Maybe my tinfoil hat is just starting to chafe a little, but I don't think what Google, MSN or Yahoo does in regards to this stuff is really a big deal, at least not bigger a deal than what your credit card, bank or even insurance company do with similair information.

    I'm all for bashing MS, but if we call them on this let's not leave out our most sacred cow, Google.

  10. People still use Hotmail? by bigtallmofo · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I've witnessed a mass-exodus from Hotmail in the last few months. Complaints range from:

    1. Being asked to type in a human-verifier code everytime you send an email
    2. Server Busy errors for hours or even days
    3. Account unavailable due to maintenance issues for hours or even days
    4. Horrible interface
    5. Spotty spam protection from everyone except the copious amount that Hotmail sends you

    I have a Hotmail account that's about 7 years old that I still check from time to time, but I can't imagine using it on a day-to-day basis.

    --
    I'm a big tall mofo.
  11. An international view by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I live in Sweden, where this sort of thing is illegal unless you ask your customer for permission first.

    Could this spell problems for Microsoft Sweden, or MS in any other (most likely european) country with the same laws?

    Yes, MS has registered and is using hotmail.se.

  12. Not really personal information... by TheNecromancer · · Score: 4, Insightful

    From the article:
    Microsoft's paid search platform will provide detailed -- but not personally identifiable -- information, such as gender, age and location, for many people who use its search engine, allowing advertisers to target their ads to a specific audience.

    Notice they aren't releasing any information (like your name, etc.) that would explicitly identify the person to the advertisers.

    I don't see a real problem with privacy here, it just looks like generalized demographic info that is useful to the advertisers.

    --
    Attention all planets of the Solar Federation! We have assumed control! - Neil Peart
    1. Re:Not really personal information... by chialea · · Score: 4, Interesting

      >Notice they aren't releasing any information (like your name, etc.) that would explicitly identify the person to the advertisers.

      There is some rather interesting research on this. Gender, age, and location is enough to identify most people, since, really, there are a limited number of people in each cartesian-type category. Note that this is different from aggregate data, which may be less personally identifiable, depending on how it's done.

      The people at the data privacy lab have gone through and identified people in "non-personally identifiable" information released by several sources. Part of the problem is that you can put these sources of data together with high confidence and both narrow down individual people and gather a LOT of information about them. I'm sure they have some papers up if you're interested:

      http://privacy.cs.cmu.edu/

      Lea

    2. Re:Not really personal information... by MoonChildCY · · Score: 2, Interesting

      You think your location is not considered information that can identify you? Granted, it depends on the resolution of the location information, but if they go under zip code (like zip+four) info, then this is indeed a violation of your privacy.

      Human Subjects Research guidelines crealy state that zip code from participants in a study are muddy water. Anything below that (zip+4), actual address, etc. is considered private information and written consent from the participant is required for the use of the data. Notice that a permission is required to USE the data. Even if you somehow have the data, you need written permission to use them. Yes yes, EULAs probably grant permission, I know.

  13. Privacy Schmivacy by Ridgelift · · Score: 4, Insightful

    FTA: "Microsoft's paid search platform will provide detailed -- but not personally identifiable -- information, such as gender, age and location, for many people who use its search engine, allowing advertisers to target their ads to a specific audience."

    Yeah, right. You target an ad to a person, they respond, and now you've got their age, location, etc. Once again the rights of the corporation outweight the rights of the individual.

  14. Interesting tidbits & Beware Relational Databa by Fox_1 · · Score: 2, Funny
    From Article:
    Yusuf Mehdi, a corporate vice president with the MSN unit, said Microsoft has gathered this personal information by tracking users who have logged into its Hotmail e-mail program or other Microsoft Web sites, and then matching the data they provided with publicly known demographics, such as average income for a particular ZIP code.

    From Yusuf Mehdi bio:
    In addition, Mehdi is also responsible for leading Microsoft's platform efforts for online advertising and digital marketing with responsibility for brand, direct marketing, pay for performance and business intelligence systems.

    From the article:
    Microsoft has made its name selling software, he (analyst David Garrity) said, and the new model of giving a product away and making money from advertising requires a steep learning curve.

    and I love this name:
    Chris Hoofnagle of the Electronic Privacy Information Center said Microsoft's efforts are part of an industrywide trend of using personal information to garner advertising dollars.

    --
    The rock, the vulture, and the chain
  15. What the EULA says by WebHostingGuy · · Score: 2, Informative

    MSN Hotmail

    Hotmail collects information during the registration process, including first and last name, country, region or state, Zip or post code, time zone, gender, birth date and occupation. You may update your registration information at any time from within your Hotmail account by clicking the "Options" button on the navigation bar, and then clicking on the "Personal" icon.

    When you create a Hotmail account, you will also simultaneously create a .NET Passport, which you will use for signing in to your Hotmail account. If you cancel this .NET Passport account, you will automatically cancel your Hotmail account. For more information about .NET Passport, visit http://www.passport.net and read the .NET Passport Privacy Statement.

    Your registration information is used to operate the site, for demographic statistics, and to display appropriate individualized advertisements. New users will receive a Hotmail welcome letter explaining the features provided by the service. Hotmail may also send periodic member letters, from which you may not unsubscribe without closing your account, to announce important service changes, new features, technical issue updates and information about other products and services.

    Hotmail is concerned about controlling unsolicited commercial e-mail, or "spam." Hotmail will not sell, lease or rent its member lists to any third parties. While Microsoft continues to actively review and implement new technology, such as expanded filtering features, there is no currently available technology that will totally prevent the sending and receiving of unsolicited e-mail. Using tools such as the Inbox Protector and being cautious about the sharing of your e-mail address while online will help reduce the amount of unsolicited e-mail you receive. For more information on how to best use Hotmail's tools, please contact abuse@hotmail.com.

    http://privacy1.msn.com/fullnotice.armx#SUPPLEME NT ARY

    --
    Quality Hosting e3 Servers
  16. You expected privacy? by catdevnull · · Score: 4, Insightful

    OK, you signed up to use "free" e-mail from the largest corporate player known for it's less-than-ethical tactics and you expected to get something for nothing from Microsoft? Yikes, people. I refused from the get go. My gut said it was a gimmick.

    Nothing is ever free from a corporation--they've got people studying consumers to find out how to make a buck off of them. That's no conspiracy theory--it's just corporate life. That's why I work at an .EDU. [That and I'm a bit of a masochist].

    --

    I might know what I'm talkin' about, but then again, this is Slashdot...
    1. Re:You expected privacy? by Saeed+al-Sahaf · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Nothing is ever free from a corporation

      And this applies to Google and Gmail as well. Google trolls your email to "serve" you adverts. Of course, Google is a Slashdot Love Child, so it's kind of OK, sort of winked at. But Microsoft, on the other hand... Pure Evil for something that is half as half baked as the Google deal. Ah, Slashdot.... Full of hypocrisy.

      --
      "Who are in control, they are not in control of anything - they don't even control themselves!" - Glen Beck
    2. Re:You expected privacy? by DenDave · · Score: 3, Funny

      Yep.. I abandoned my hotmail account years ago when they came with additional terms of use and mandatory passport... as for yahoo, I went to yahoo.co.uk as at the time they didn't register all that much and they are still certain that I am 89 years old living in antarctica and I have an avid interest in receiving free information about birdwatching, these free informational mails are forwarded to my hotmail account, which I haven't even thought about since 1998...

      --
      -if at first you don't succeed, stay the heck away from paragliding.
    3. Re:You expected privacy? by DrugCheese · · Score: 2, Funny

      I signed up for free email before hotmail was bought by microsoft. I remember the day I logged in and the little butterfly logo had landed on the page, sad day. The privacy agreements had to of changed.

      On a side note I still think it's hilarious that microsofts mascot is a bug.

      --
      *DrugCheese rants*
  17. The thing I feel worst about,......Really? by roberthhid · · Score: 2, Funny

    From the article: "That's probably the thing I feel worst about over the last few years -- not making our own R&D investment," Ballmer said. Umh, wasn't there a certain monkey dance that is regretted more?

  18. A Internet business plan that _works..._ by dpbsmith · · Score: 2, Funny

    1) Collect personal information for years with privacy notice consisting of twenty pages of legal language displayed in a 4"x1" scroll box. First line reads "Your privacy is our foremost concern." Last line reads "Terms may be changed at any time without notice."

    2) Don't do anything until you've got enough information to be valuable.

    3) Change terms without notice.

    4) Sell personal information and PROFIT!

  19. Re:Bogus! Money Quote Follows: by lukewarmfusion · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Followed up with exactly the same thing that Google, Yahoo!, and many other companies do:

    "For example, a car company could choose to have Microsoft display its sports car link when a man types in certain keywords, and a link to an SUV model when a woman uses the search criteria."

    Not a privacy concern. It's using the Internet's advantages to the benefit of 1) the advertiser and 2) the consumer (potentially).

    If I'm surfing for "SUV" then maybe I would rather see sponsored links for SUV companies rather than random, unrelated ads for shower gel. As an advertiser, I know that I can buy a billboard for n dollars and have no idea how many people drove by the billboard, made inquiries into my company as a result of the billboard, or became customers are a result of the billboard. With the Internet, I can do all of that - it lets me be a more informed advertiser, use my money more appropriately, and improve general service for customers.

  20. cookies by Alain+Williams · · Score: 2
    This is the sort of reason that I go through my browser cookies every couple of months and zap anything that I don't recognise and want to keep.

    OK: that won't fix all tracking (including this M$ one) but it helps.

  21. Who didn't see this coming? by StankDawg · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It could get scarier!

    I went into a discussion on Binary Revolution Radio (http://www.binrev.com/radio/) episode #80 about the possibility (or rather INEVITABILITY) of Microsoft combining all of its databases from all of its individual services (hotmail, MSDN, spaces, search, etc...) and data mining them for common data. Each individual privacy policy becomes meaningless. They may not sell your data, but they can combine it and put together a pretty powerful profile about you.

    The key, and the reason that I pointed it out on this episode, is the new Microsoft genuine program. All of the other databases could have been joined on names, phone numbers, and other PII (Personally Identifiable Information) which is not always reliable. With the new "genuine program" they get a hash of your system as part of the process that uniquely ties you to that computer.

    With one anchor like that that *is* reliable (most of the time) they now have a way to tie your visits to your accounts from that PC to all of your other MS service accounts. For example, logging into hotmail from that "marked" PC.

    It is not rock solid and may not be completely provable (people do use other peoples computers) but it will work most of the time. That is a very scary data warehouse that could provide extremely targeted advertising which would fetch top dollar from advertisers.

    --
    --- The revolution will be digitized! - http://www.binrev.com/ ---
  22. Re:MSN has always been a privacy threat by naylor83 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Being a convicted monopoly doesn't make everything they do illegal.

  23. Ah Slashdot.... by Saeed+al-Sahaf · · Score: 3, Interesting

    How is this any different than Google trolling through your email? Oh, it's not quite as bad, but since it's Microsoft, it's Pure Evil? And of course since Google is our Love Child, it's OK for them to do something that in reality is twice as offensive? Ah Slashdot....

    --
    "Who are in control, they are not in control of anything - they don't even control themselves!" - Glen Beck
    1. Re:Ah Slashdot.... by tajmorton · · Score: 2, Informative
      I hate to feed the trolls, but...
      How is this any different than Google trolling through your email?
      Google isn't reading your mail: http://gmail.google.com/gmail/help/privacy.html
      • We will never rent, sell or share information that personally identifies you for marketing purposes without your express permission.
      • We serve highly relevant ads and other information as part of the service using our unique content-targeting technology. No human reads your email to target ads or related information to you without your consent.

      And, in terms of showing the ads, and parsing through your mail there...how is that different than a spam filter? Does your ISP have a privacy policy that says they won't read your email? I can't even find the privacy policy of my ISP!

      --
      Tell the truth and you won't have so much to remember.
    2. Re:Ah Slashdot.... by aurumaeus · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Google doesn't "Troll" through your email. You get ads that are selected based on words that are, at display time, found to be present in whatever email you're looking at. It's annonymous, and not at all based on personal information (and yes, those are two different things). Of course, MSFT wouldn't be the first to target ads with user profile information.

  24. Targeted Ads by RagingChipmunk · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Who cares? Who actually uses MS "SEARCH" anyway? It sucks, and if they want it to suck even more, they'll incorporate 'targeted ads'. If they want to follow in the footsteps of AOL thats fine by me. They're going to be fighting AOL for a segment of "very large but mentally insignificant" web-users.

    --
    The only PT Boat Journal on the web: http://www.PT171.org
  25. Their privacy info. by blanks · · Score: 2, Interesting

    From their terms of service and privacy info.

    http://privacy1.msn.com/

    These are just random bits I collected that related to advertisers and personal information.

    Also you may want to read the pasport privacy link, as this is how msn connects all their sites.

    http://www.passport.net/Consumer/Privacy Policy.asp?PPlcid=2057

    At some sites, MSN collects personal information, such as your e-mail address, name, home or work address or telephone number. MSN may also collect demographic information, such as your post code, age, gender, preferences, interests and favorites. Information collected by MSN may be combined with information obtained from other Microsoft services and other companies

    The information we collect may be combined with information obtained from other Microsoft services and other companies.

    MSN may also place Web beacons from third parties on our site in order to compile aggregated statistics and to help determine the effectiveness of our joint promotional or advertising campaigns. MSN prohibits Web beacons on our site from being used by third parties to access your personal information.

    Use of Third Party Ad Networks

    The majority of the online banner advertisements you see on MSN Web pages are displayed by MSN.

    Your registration information is used to operate the site, for demographic statistics, and to display appropriate individualized advertisements.

    In addition, MSN allows other companies, called third-party ad servers or ad networks, to display advertisements on MSN Web pages. Some of these ad networks may place a persistent cookie on your computer. Doing this allows the ad network to recognize your computer each time they send you an online advertisement. In this way, ad networks may compile information about where you, or others who are using your computer, saw their advertisements and determine which ads are clicked on. This information allows an ad network to deliver targeted advertisements that they believe will be of most interest to you.

  26. And? by tomstdenis · · Score: 4, Insightful

    How can you expect privacy when you're giving your info to another person?

    Microsoft didn't force you to login to hotmail. And the fact that you happen to have private information there is your own damn fault.

    It would be different if your ISP was giving out your emails or other details since you pay them for the service...

    And you really don't think Google isn't laughing at the stock of "private" information stored in their gmail archives?

    Tom

    --
    Someday, I'll have a real sig.
  27. Ooooh...they wanted my real information? by neckdeepinspecialsau · · Score: 3, Interesting
    Does anyone put real information into hotmail or yahoo mail services?

    If you do and you don't want to feel free to use my "real information":

    Bob Smith 1313 Mockingbirdlane Beverly Hills Califonia 90210 555-555-5555 (h) 555-555-5555 (c) alternate email ifjeufeiehhc@yahoo.com

    The real question is do they feel guilty charging for junk data?

    1. Re:Ooooh...they wanted my real information? by Alsee · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Oh, they don't make money selling the junk data. They make money selling RELIABLE data. Any website you go to can see your IP address and that IP address can be matched with the real-world area it serves. In US urban and suburban areas this will most often pin down your true location within a few miles. In rural areas and in other countries it can ususally pin people down within a several dozen miles.

      Just try this website to convert your IP to a real-world address. For me it reported one town over, about a mile away.

      -

      --
      - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
  28. GMail by northcat · · Score: 2, Insightful

    GMail placed context sensitive ads based on people's private emails. In competition (maybe not in direct competition, but still in competition) MSN is going a step further and doing this. In competition Google or someone else might go a step even further and do something even worse. That's why even a small case of invasion of privacy is bad -- it leads to competition in unhealthy areas and it gives more justification for bigger transgressions -- and that's why some of the hue and cry raised over gmail was justified. (And of course, there is also the justifiable argument that even a small case of invasion of privacy is not acceptable)

  29. Re:Bogus! Money Quote Follows: by theVP · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I'm sorry, I know this is going to really piss some people off here at slashdot, but I actually LIKE those little ads on the sidebar that are specified to what I'm searching for. Especially when I'm attempting to find something I want to buy. There has been many a time when I'm trying to find something via Google, or I get an email special in my Gmail account, that the links on the side take me to something even better. Not all ads are neccessarily scams. I mean, its not like they're installing software on my computer, so I just really don't see the point in arguing over this. To me, it really ENHANCES my search for products more than it hinders.

    If Microsoft sees this, and they see that it'll bring in some more revenue, why SHOULDN'T they try something like this?

    --
    "No one is more miserable than the person who wills everything and can do nothing." -Emperor Claudius 10 BC - AD 54
  30. Re:Nothing new here. by Joules+Burn · · Score: 2, Interesting

    When a tv can report back to its master what channel I'm watching, when and for how long, my sole remaining tv will have a new home on the curbside.

  31. This is not what Google does... but it's been done by Old+Man+Kensey · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Google/Gmail displays ads based on keyword text. The advertiser knows nothing about you as a person, just that your search string/e-mail message contains certain words. Come to think of it, I don't remember ever giving Gmail any statistical info about myself. As far as I remember I just clicked the invite link I got in my e-mail and gave them my desired username and password.

    What Microsoft is doing is what AOL has done for years -- providing data on the actual person such as age, gender, and location. AOL users have an object called the "q_context" that follows them around (like a cookie) that contains basic demographic info about you, and display objects can use info in the q_context to do things like pop up your local weather in a field, or (presumably) an ad targeted at your age and gender as well as your location.

    This is nothing new, and it's really nothing all that bad, but it's still a lot more than Google does.

    --
    -- Old Man Kensey
  32. Hotmail=Junkmail by Etrigan66 · · Score: 2, Informative

    They can look thru my hotmail account all they like. It only ever gets used when I need to provide a valid email address to a website I'm visiting. This way, my home email doesn't get flooded with the porn ads/medications ads that seem to find their way to me after a visit amazon, hahaha.

  33. Microsoft would do something like this: by rice_burners_suck · · Score: 2, Insightful
    In my opinion, Microsoft should make a software activation scheme across all software they make, which would request every imaginable piece of identifying information about a person.

    For example, the system could force users to enter: Date of birth, ethnic affiliation, gender, sexual preference, social security number, driver license number, tax documents filed in the last 15 years, criminal records, photocopies of birth certificates, a list of current and past employers, amount of pay over a 10 year period, number of spouse and children, names, genders, social security numbers, and birth certificates of all family members, and the list goes on and on. It would take the average person a week to collect all of the information and to prepare all the documents for submission to Microsoft to activate a piece of software.

    This would be good for the economy because companies will pop up everywhere that will file for you, similarly to the way that tax preparation companies exist all over the place.

    But here's the best part: When the software is activated, Microsoft's systems would automatically verify all of the information with state and federal computer systems. Any incorrect information would be grounds for lawsuit and police action for fraud.

    Assuming you're not busted for fraud, Microsoft would then sell complete identifying information to advertisers and businesses of all kinds, especially businesses that nobody's ever heard of, which are not reputable, or businesses which are specifically shady and/or illegal. These businesses could then use the information to specifically target advertisements for individual potential customers. They could also enhance their revenue by stealing the identity of those who do not purchase their products, thereby taking advantage of their government-granted right to guaranteed profits from business activities. Microsoft would collect a 99% tax on these profits, to recompense it for building such a vast and complex system.

    Microsoft. Where do you want to go today?

  34. Slashdot is already doing this! by GhengisKron · · Score: 2, Funny

    How else would they know to show me ads for Linux servers?

  35. So? by Locke2005 · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Show of hands: who actually gave correct personal information when creating their hotmail accounts? Ok morons, you can put your hands down now!

    I feel a personal responsibility to put down as much erroneous and conflicting information as possible when filling out web forms. I'm pretty sure hotmail beleives that I am an 18 year old female virgin with an annual income of $0 whose name is Bill Gates and whose address is 1 Microsoft Way, Redmond, WA... yeah, that info should be really useful to potential advertisers!

    --
    I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.