Slashdot Mirror


USA National Memory Championships

bigtallmofo writes "Could you memorize 1,000 digits in under an hour? How about remember the exact order of 10 shuffled decks of playing cards in under an hour as well as one shuffled deck in less than two minutes? If so, you could be counted among 36 grand masters of memory worldwide. Slate is reporting that other spectacular memory feats were performed at the 2005 USA National Memory Championship. Congratulations to Ram Kolli, a graduate student in computer science at Virginia Tech, and this year's champ."

135 of 215 comments (clear)

  1. Congress To Open Hearings On Memory Championships by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    By The Washington Post and The Associated Press

    WASHINGTON -- Senator John McCain (R-AZ) announced Friday afternoon that the Senate would be opening hearings on the USA National Memory Championships after allegations of illegal memory augmentation surfaced. "These allegations of illegal computer implants are very frightening, and we owe it to the American people to investigate this matter fully. Our children are looking up to these men and women as role models, and if they're not actually memorizing things on their own with their God given abilities, we need to put an end to it. There are long term dangers to brain function many of these people are either unaware of or simply ignoring for short-sighted goals."

    This year's champion Ram Kolli was among the first to be subpoenaed in the matter, and was expected to testify this week. "I've never illegaly used a computer to assist my memory in my life" said Kolli, noting that he had used computer storage in the past but only in legal ways, such as for class notes and assignments. "I've trained too long and too hard for these championships to throw it all away by using illegal implants. When I memorized pages 73 through 82 of the New York City phonebook, that was all me, and Jorge Benwalt of 212-555-2934 knows it."

    Several Google executives have also been called on to testify following claims that they've produced a blackmarket implant that allows people to search Google with their brain. Sources close to Google acknowledged they've done research on such devices, but claim none have been produced or used outside of the lab environment. Google could not be reached for official comment at press time.

  2. Car Keys by jacksonai · · Score: 5, Funny

    Yeah, but can he remember where I left my car keys?

    --
    Like Sweepstakes? Try out my service @ http://www.yourpowersweeps.com -- Free 21 day trial, no cc needed.
    1. Re:Car Keys by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      The last place you put them.

    2. Re:Car Keys by 00420 · · Score: 1

      They're always the last place you look.

      Unless you're an idiot and keep searching after they've been found :)

    3. Re:Car Keys by hey! · · Score: 1
      Well, yes. Almost everyone under the age of 40 and most people under the age of 50 can remember where they put the car keys.


      The problem is being aware that you're putting them in some stupid place while you're doing it. You can't remember what you don't know in the first place.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    4. Re:Car Keys by lw54 · · Score: 1

      I'm pretty sure you will find them in the last place you'll look =)

  3. So I'm about to post a comment... by Prophetic_Truth · · Score: 2, Funny

    But I have forgotton what this article is about.

    --
    time is a perception of a being's consciousness
    time is your 6th sense, the wierd ones are 7+
  4. The visual memory technique really works... by tquinlan · · Score: 5, Interesting

    ...try it some time. The next time you're out of the office, try this:

    - Imagine you're going to send an email to everyone in your department.
    - Imagine, now, that email lists are somehow unavailable.

    - Starting with yourself, identify all the people in your row.

    - Go one row over, and identify all those people.

    Do the same for the rest of the rows.

    For those of you who sit in circles in the office, just work your way around from right to left (or left to right). ;)

    You'll be surprised at how many people you can remember!

    It works with restaurants, too, but since you're not likely to know those people, faces and habits will most likely stick out, rather than names.

    --
    DBA? Software Engineer? My company is hiring! Click
    1. Re:The visual memory technique really works... by iminplaya · · Score: 3, Funny

      I use the Layden technique. According to her, it's foolproof.

      --
      What?
    2. Re:The visual memory technique really works... by iminplaya · · Score: 2, Funny

      I'm sorry. I forgot that Saturday is "No Jokes" day on Slashdot. Maybe if I post this next Wednesday when the article is duped, a moderator with a sense of humor will find it.

      --
      What?
    3. Re:The visual memory technique really works... by Legion303 · · Score: 1

      "Pornography addicts have a more difficult time recovering from their addiction than cocaine addicts, since coke users can get the drug out of their system, but pornographic images stay in the brain forever, Layden said."

      I don't know...I find I have to refresh my memory every so often...

      On the plus side, my hand-eye coordination rocks!

    4. Re:The visual memory technique really works... by mangu · · Score: 1

      from the same article: When Brownback asked the panelists for suggestions about what should be done, the responses were mild, considering their earlier indictment of pornography. Several suggested that federal money be allocated to fund brain-mapping studies into the physical effects of pornography.

      I wonder if they need volunteers for those studies?

  5. Re:The Human Brain by millette · · Score: 1

    Power, it's more about its distribution. Some are more visual, some auditory, some learn better alone, others depend on groups, etc. Power means squat. We're talking vectors here. Oh wait, no, what was it..?

  6. The guy has it easy by Rosco+P.+Coltrane · · Score: 5, Funny

    Congratulations to Ram Kolli

    A guy named "Ram" who's a memory champion? come on...

    --
    "A door is what a dog is perpetually on the wrong side of" - Ogden Nash
    1. Re:The guy has it easy by Fox_1 · · Score: 2, Funny

      yeah but he's great for the short term (20,30min contest in the competition) but for long term you want his buddy Maxtor

      --
      The rock, the vulture, and the chain
    2. Re:The guy has it easy by neil.pearce · · Score: 3, Funny

      His brother "Rom" knows a lot more, but it's all out of date now...

    3. Re:The guy has it easy by hey! · · Score: 1

      It's not so much out of date, but it's gone so much to his head he doesn't listen to anybody more.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    4. Re:The guy has it easy by antic · · Score: 1


      I spotted another issue with the Slashdot intro -- they spelt "chump" incorrectly.

      --
      'Thats they exact same thing a banana wrench monkey.'
    5. Re:The guy has it easy by Linker3000 · · Score: 4, Funny

      Rom's just been escorted from the building by the police - he was caught flashing.

      --
      AT&ROFLMAO
    6. Re:The guy has it easy by JoshWurzel · · Score: 1

      Yeah he's great until you tell him something new. Or until he goes to bed for the night.

    7. Re:The guy has it easy by the+way,+what're+you · · Score: 1
      A guy named "Ram" who's a memory champion? come on...
      Yeah, that's like a porn star named "Hard Disk with Fluid Bearings"
      --
      example.org - powered by Linux!
  7. Re:The Human Brain by Capt.+Dick+Jackman · · Score: 1

    It'd be cool to take the memory of one of these guys and combine it with the insight of Einstein, the computational abilities of John von Neumann, and maybe throw in some Hilbert, Gauss, and Riemann. Now that would be one smart mother fscker. I think mathematics and physics have an anti-memory effect though. It happened to me and others like the famously absent minded Norbert Wiener.

    --
    Anyone who isn't confused really doesn't understand the situation.
  8. DUPE DUPE !!!!!oneleven!! by 88NoSoup4U88 · · Score: 3, Funny

    Ohwait...

    1. Re:DUPE DUPE !!!!!oneleven!! by 88NoSoup4U88 · · Score: 1

      At 0, Flamebait, I guess my assumption of a subtle joke not succeeding was right :)

  9. Imagine if... by gardyloo · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...Slashdot editors could do that.

  10. hmmm by scott9676 · · Score: 1

    I work in a 4 person department in a 20 person company.

    I ran rattle them all off. Now where's my prize?

    Though sometimes I have to think about what my own phone number is.....

  11. Re:So what by Rosco+P.+Coltrane · · Score: 1

    Read TFA and you'll have the answer in less time than it takes to say "Slashdottern lesen nicht dem fucking artikel"

    --
    "A door is what a dog is perpetually on the wrong side of" - Ogden Nash
  12. Re:The Human Brain by Klar · · Score: 2, Funny

    That'd be one boring ass smart person, maybe throw a bit of Chris Rock's wit in there for fun.

  13. More practically.. by pilkul · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Similar techniques are sometimes used by adult foreign learners to learn Chinese/Japanese characters. It can be easier to remember, say, Darth Vader setting a pack of wild dogs on fire on a pile of flowers in a swamp, than 25 strokes of chicken scribbles. James Heisig's Remembering the Kanji is the most popular (perhaps the only?) book using such a method.

    In this context such methods are fairly controversial, since the mnemonics are rather time-consuming to learn and recall is slower than brute force (on the order of 5-10 seconds instead of instantaneous), but it has some quite dedicated followers.

    1. Re:More practically.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Yes, but do they bring out a new edition of the book every time Lucas f's with Star Wars. "Now that character is like Han firing at Greedo in the Cantina. Now was that when he fired first or last or when it was in 3D I wonder".

    2. Re:More practically.. by wiredlogic · · Score: 1

      Henshall's Guide to remembering Japanese characters Is a good book with mnemonic suggestions as well as good scholarly descriptions of how the characters were developed. I find the latter to be more informative and useful than meaningless mnemonics. It's more of a reference book, rather than a guided study.

      --
      I am becoming gerund, destroyer of verbs.
    3. Re:More practically.. by pilkul · · Score: 1

      Henshall is useful as a reference for people who are already quite literate in Japanese, but I would never recommend it to a beginner. (It certainly wasn't useful for me when I was a beginner.) His verbal mnemonics are not nearly as easy to remember as Heisig's imagery, and learning the convoluted history of characters is, to a beginner, more likely to lead to confusion than easy recall. Henshall and Heisig are quite different kinds of books and I'm not sure why people are always treating them as competitors.

    4. Re:More practically.. by Mac+Mini+Enthusiast · · Score: 1
      I find the latter to be more informative and useful than meaningless mnemonics.

      Found it on the web (at least some of them) here .

      I think Henshall's method is much better, especially since the kanji were originally developed in ways that have innate mnemonics in them. Eg. sun and moon together are bright, woman and child together mean 'like', as a women likes a child, prostitute is woman and dazzling, etc.

      For anybody that doesn't know Japanese (or Chinese), you might want to check out this elementary kanji page and see some of the basic Kanji. They're actually pretty interesting to learn about, and you can easily learn the first twenty or so pretty quickly. You will probably even recognize some of these characters next time you happen across a Chinese or Japanese newspaper or website.

      --
      Free Mac Mini with Equal Opportunity
      Email me or follow the homepage link
  14. Many local students? by Rightcoast · · Score: 2, Interesting

    What are the odds that out the 24 contestants one hailed from a local high school. Now, what are the odds that the contest had "many local high school students"?

  15. A game these guys would pwn at... by Zsinj · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Here's an interesting memory game to try [2 more more people]

    Take a deck of cards, shuffled. Remove 1 card randomly and place it face down on the side of the table. All of the players sit in a semi-circle in front of the dealer.

    The dealer than plays 1 card face up in the center of the table. ~1 second later, he plays another on top of the card. Repeat 51 times, showing the players 1 card in the deck at a time. When the last card is played, cover the deck up in the middle of the table.

    The players (and dealer if he didnt cheat) has seen all cards - save one. The pur-chance-guessing-game ensues: what is that card that is face-down on the side of the table?

    1. Re:A game these guys would pwn at... by nate+nice · · Score: 1

      The Ace of Spades of course!

      --
      "If you are a dreamer, a wisher, a liar, A hope-er, a pray-er, a magic bean buyer ..."
    2. Re:A game these guys would pwn at... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

      That's quite easy though isn't it?

      Just assign all the cards a numerical value from 1 to 13. Now, assign the suits a letter, eg. S=Spades, C=Clubs, H=Hearts, D=Diamonds.

      Now as long as you can add, you only have 4 numbers to keep track of :)

      At the end of the dealing, you should have three numbers that are equal to 91 (the sum of 1 through to 13), and one number that is less,
      eg. S91, C91, H91, D80.

      This tells you that the initial card was the Jack of Diamonds (11 count for D). Simple :)

      I'm sure there is an easier way, but this was the first thing that immediately popped into my head when I read you post.
      Have fun the next time you play!

    3. Re:A game these guys would pwn at... by Trailwalker · · Score: 1

      Any bridge or pinocchle player would know the card at at the end of the deal. Its a guessing game only for people who do not regularly play cards.

    4. Re:A game these guys would pwn at... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You can sum the numerical values modulo 13, and sum the suits (arbitrary assignment of suits to values 1,2,3,4) modulo 4. The missing card is the one which if added would give you 0 for your sum modulo 13, and 2 for your sum modulo 4.

      This requires keeping track of one number up to 12 and one number up to 3, instead of four numbers up to 91 for your method.

    5. Re:A game these guys would pwn at... by Jeff+Benjamin · · Score: 2, Funny

      Ill bet youra blast at parties.

    6. Re:A game these guys would pwn at... by kurosawdust · · Score: 2

      That's quite easy though isn't it? Keeping track of four running counts in your head, continually updating them each second? Expert card-counters at blackjack train for years to be able to do that. It seems easy on paper, but I suggest you try it sometime (don't forget, no cheating - 1 second per card :))

    7. Re:A game these guys would pwn at... by Dulimano · · Score: 1

      Yeah. I just did this trick with a deck reduced to numbers 2 to 9. (Modulo 10 arithmetics is easier.) I managed to deeply impress my non-geek girlfriend.

  16. Re:The Human Brain by Capt.+Dick+Jackman · · Score: 3, Funny

    Now that would be hilarious. I'd love to see Chris Rocks routine generalized to Banach spaces and arbitrary metrics.

    --
    Anyone who isn't confused really doesn't understand the situation.
  17. Aw, Pooh by Spencerian · · Score: 2, Funny

    Forget all of this.

    How many of us can remember how many girlfriends we've had sex with?

    Oh.--wait--I forgot where I was posting...

    --
    Vos teneo officium eram periculosus ut vos recipero is.
    1. Re:Aw, Pooh by michaeldot · · Score: 1
      How many of us can remember how many girlfriends we've had sex with?

      Probably everyone. (At least, Andie McDowell's character in Four Weddings in a Funeral had no trouble remembering her 33, which (I hope) is a great many by most people's standards.)

      But a more important thing to remember is this: the probability of contracting something nasty increases exponentially with the number of partners.

    2. Re:Aw, Pooh by jareds · · Score: 1

      But a more important thing to remember is this: the probability of contracting something nasty increases exponentially with the number of partners.

      It does not even increase linearly. The probability will be something like 1-(1-p)^n as a function of the number of partners n.

    3. Re:Aw, Pooh by michaeldot · · Score: 1

      You're not taking into account the fact that every one of your partners has also had partners...

    4. Re:Aw, Pooh by jareds · · Score: 1

      The value p will vary depending on whether you are finding partners for long-term relationships, short-term relationships, one-night stands, etc. Thus, if you first have two long-term relationships and then have a one-night stand, the latter certainly increases your risk more than linearly.

      If that is all you're saying, we agree. I do maintain that if you're having a number of sexual encounters all of the same type, the risk is as I described.

  18. mounted? by GrAfFiT · · Score: 4, Funny

    ..but can they be mounted as a mass storage volume on Linux ?

    1. Re:mounted? by LiquidCoooled · · Score: 1

      If you convert the Linux kernel to audio tones and play them to yourself over and over during the night, the very next day, everywhere you doodle, you will keep drawing penguins.

      strange but true.

      --
      liqbase :: faster than paper
  19. Re:Congress To Open Hearings On Memory Championshi by LokieLizzy · · Score: 1
    Several Google executives have also been called on to testify following claims that they've produced a blackmarket implant that allows people to search Google with their brain. Sources close to Google acknowledged they've done research on such devices, but claim none have been produced or used outside of the lab environment.

    Even though you're joking, reading this part got me to thinking of how much our concepts of time and memory at large could be altered if we were able to search through the vast archives of past memories (repressed and active) with the efficiency of Google. Can you imagine being able to remember being slapped by the doctor in a white hospital room, seeing the world for the very first time? Or how about every single dream you ever had - *ever*?

    There are so many things we have yet to discover about ourselves, and about the human mind.

    --
    My digital rights don't need management.
  20. Ok, this is just a little wierd... by Fiz+Ocelot · · Score: 4, Interesting
    when Cooke sees a three of clubs, a nine of hearts, and a nine of spades, he immediately conjures up an image of Brazilian lingerie model Adriana Lima in a Biggles biplane shooting at his old public-school headmaster in a suit of armor.

    It's that much easier to remember something like that than just three cards? I guess it's like they actually translate the entire deck into a sort of language. Then they just translate it using the same language every time.

    1. Re:Ok, this is just a little wierd... by pilkul · · Score: 1

      Language is not quite accurate, the vivid imagery is important. Remembering that sentence would be hard but remembering the picture would not be so hard, especially if you are already familiar with the objects visualized. He visualizes a 3-dimensional scene, with the respective actors in various positions, and then recalls it as a unified whole just like you might a bedroom with a desk, bed, dresser etc.

    2. Re:Ok, this is just a little wierd... by hunterx11 · · Score: 2, Funny
      In other words, Hollywood executives declare writers outdated and unnecessary, and instead shuffle a deck of cards to determine their new stories.

      Often enough, nobody would be able to tell the difference.

      --
      English is easier said than done.
    3. Re:Ok, this is just a little wierd... by Spunk · · Score: 1

      Funny, I also think of Adriana Lima when I see a card. Ok, and when I don't see a card.

    4. Re:Ok, this is just a little wierd... by csguy314 · · Score: 1

      Hmm... this sounds better than their current method... that is, throwing animal feces at a dart board and interpreting the result into a script.

      --
      This is left as an exercise for the reader.
  21. Re:Congress To Open Hearings On Memory Championshi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Imagine how much the *AA would panic if every song or movie you heard or saw was a permanent part of your memory that could be recalled in full quality at any time.

  22. Re:The Human Brain by ebrandsberg · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Einstein's brain was probably wired completely different. I bet he would forget to pickup milk on the way home, instead, constantly thinking about something grand. I tend to be HORRIBLE at memorization, yet can solve problems others find difficult. Everybody is different, it is just a matter of what skills and to what degree we use them.

  23. I'd settle for... by NoMoreNicksLeft · · Score: 4, Funny

    Editors that could remember the stories that they put up the day before.

    1. Re:I'd settle for... by darkonc · · Score: 1

      If a slashdot editor could do that, they'd probably think that they could win the competition.
      ..... Surprise!!!!!

      --
      Sometimes boldness is in fashion. Sometimes only the brave will be bold.
  24. Re:Congress To Open Hearings On Memory Championshi by UserGoogol · · Score: 1

    I believe that because the brain is still developing, infant memories often don't survive in any form. But otherwise, yes, that would amazingly cool. Although if we were going to do computer-brain interfaces, there are of course many many other awesomely neat things you could do.

    --
    "Never attribute to malice that which can be adequately explained by stupidity." -- Hanlon's Razor
  25. Imagine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Imagine a beowulf cluster of them.

  26. So the champion is a sheep by flibble-san · · Score: 1

    Baaaa

    --
    My other sig is crap too
  27. FAKE FAKE FAKE! by Linker3000 · · Score: 1

    "...but claim none have been..."

    As any real journalist would know, it should be "...none has..."

    --
    AT&ROFLMAO
    1. Re:FAKE FAKE FAKE! by Legion303 · · Score: 1

      "As any real journalist would know"

      Guess that means we won't see that story on the front page of Slashdot.

  28. Re:The Human Brain by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Is incredible how powerfull can the human brain be. If these people can do that imagine what could Einstein do ?

    Likely, not that much better. Read the article. These people use an assortment of mnemonic devices to remember these large chunks of data. If you tried to remember a series of cards, you would get lost in the volume of data. But if you remember each three cards in order as "person action object", then you can remember the sequence of cards as a story, and that is orders of magnitude easier to remember, because it has real meaning, whereas a sequence of cards is essentially meaningless. The brain sucks at remembering things without meaning, and excels at things that have meaning. That seems to be because our memory is inherently associative. We remember things by associating them to other things. That way the more associations you can make between a new factoid and existing concepts in your brain, the more easily you'll remember it.

  29. Re:The Human Brain by Concerned+Onlooker · · Score: 2, Funny
    Is incredible how powerfull can the human brain be. If these people can do that imagine what could Einstein do ?

    Well, not that much anymore, I suspect.

    --
    http://www.rootstrikers.org/
  30. MOD THIS FUNNY by Capt.+Dick+Jackman · · Score: 1

    That's the funniest thing I've read all day.

    --
    Anyone who isn't confused really doesn't understand the situation.
  31. Sounds like a kid from my high school, by Aeron65432 · · Score: 1

    who has Pi memorized to 450 digits. He celebrated pi day (3/14) by memorizing his 500th, and repeating them nonstop all day long. Got a bit on everyone's nerves to say the least.

    1. Re:Sounds like a kid from my high school, by supmylO · · Score: 1

      Watch out, my guess is that kid probably reads /.

  32. Obligatory quote... by elgatozorbas · · Score: 1
    How about remember the exact order of 10 shuffled decks of playing cards in under an hour as well as one shuffled deck in less than two minutes?

    Of course. I'm an excellent driver... four minutes to Wopner...

    1. Re:Obligatory quote... by kzinti · · Score: 1

      This definitely isn't my underwear!

    2. Re:Obligatory quote... by gnu-sucks · · Score: 1

      Should have gone to K-Mart

  33. USA National Memory Technology Championships by davidwr · · Score: 1

    Am I the only one who glanced at the headline and thought this was a face-off of RAM technologies?

    --
    Knowledge is how to play a game, intelligence is how to win, wisdom is knowing what game to play.
  34. Re:The Human Brain by GNUALMAFUERTE · · Score: 1

    Memory and inteligence are not necesarily related.

    --
    WTF am I doing replying to an AC at 5 A.M on a Friday night?
  35. Re:Memorize this! by Capt.+Dick+Jackman · · Score: 1

    That's easy, just expand the infinite series of arctan 1 and multiply by 4.

    --
    Anyone who isn't confused really doesn't understand the situation.
  36. shoot! by jayloden · · Score: 2, Funny

    oh man, I was supposed to compete this year, but I totally forgot...

  37. When it fails by wk633 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I once heard an interview with one of these types who did his act as a show. He said the only time he forgot an object somone in the audience asked him to remember, it was an egg. He foolishly placed it next to a white wall in his imaginary home town. When he walked back through town, he didn't see it against the wall.

  38. Re:The Human Brain by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Yeah, reminds me of every cockwad who dismisses memory, IQ etc and tries to play the we are all special in our own way card.
    No i bet Einstein had an awesome memory for what was important.

  39. Re:Memorize this! by LnxAddct · · Score: 1

    Hrm... I think I see a pattern there.

  40. Re:Congress To Open Hearings On Memory Championshi by seminumerical · · Score: 1
    Well I am glad to see that you qualified that with "often". That the brain is still developing has a powerful effect in distorting early memories, sure. But that is offset by the primacy of the memories. They have the advantage of "first post", or the first few posts, so to speak.

    I have spoken to many people who remember nothing from before the age of 5 or 6. On the other hand there are a surprising number of adults who can describe, even name, songs, people, toys, places from the age of three or earlier (under accidentally controlled conditions. For instance, my family moved when I was 4, but I can describe the world that was around me before that, including my brother's birth when I was 2 1/2, and the daycare center I attended when I was 3)

    Even earlier memories are still there, in every moment of our life. They just aren't the kinds of memories we recall remembering. They are just a part of us.

    p.s. I don't count Salvador Dali, who claims to remember things from the womb, hehe.

    --
    In wartime... truth is so precious that she should always be attended by a bodyguard of lies. (Churchill)
  41. Re:Congress To Open Hearings On Memory Championshi by zippthorne · · Score: 5, Informative

    That's incorrect. A quick web search reveals: http://ask.yahoo.com/ask/20020826.html Only 555-0100 through 555-0199 are exclusively reserved for movies. The remainder of the 555 exchange is being parceled out.

    AFAIK, this was not always the case though.

    --
    Can you be Even More Awesome?!
  42. Seems old fashion.. by cfavader · · Score: 1

    Although I'm sure a fantastic memory would be helpful right now, projects like beagle and dashboard will hopefully let those of us with horrible memory get by just as well.

    Oh well, guess we have to waste money on something

  43. Wow! a use for tarot by zippthorne · · Score: 1

    I could tell the difference. The card-shuffle movies would be much better.

    --
    Can you be Even More Awesome?!
  44. Re:The Human Brain by jay-be-em · · Score: 2, Informative

    Einstein was the archetypal forgetful scientist.

    --
    "Orthodoxy means not thinking--not needing to think. Orthodoxy is unconsciousness." --Eric Blair
  45. well. by kautilya · · Score: 1

    Well, I know the guy and his nickname is infact RAM. .(with capital letters). He is now a business analyst with CapitalOne.

  46. Ed Cooke by chri1753 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Ed Cooke, who "would have destroyed the American competition", is a dear friend of mine. He learnt early on that it's polite, when swapping phone numbers, to pretend to write down the number given to you.

  47. Casinos! by Dark+Coder · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Why bother attending the championship?

    The private "agency", that Casinos use to scope these potential card counters, probably compile a dossier of these mentats.

    Don't bother, just rip the casino off while you can.

    1. Re:Casinos! by friedo · · Score: 4, Interesting
      Even the best card counters don't win that big at casinos. The slight edge it gives you at Blackjack, for example, is largely eliminated by frequent shuffles and large shoes.

      If you want to make money at a casino, don't try to beat the casino at their own game. Play against chumps who are bad at poker.

    2. Re:Casinos! by michaeldot · · Score: 3, Informative
      The private "agency", that Casinos use to scope these potential card counters, probably compile a dossier of these mentats.

      Actually, you don't need a good memory to card count.

      Card counting consists of determining the ratio of high cards (tens, aces) to low cards (2-6). To find this you simply add one for each low card that appears and subtract one for each high card.

      This gives the running count, which you can divide by the number of decks remaining to find the True Count, which is used to make decisions - how much to bet, or whether to deviate from Basic Strategy in playing a hand.

      So, at any given time you're only actually remembering one number.

      The hardest part about modern card counting is actually maintaining a good cover, that is, pretending to be rich and careless when you throw out black chips, or drunk and stupid, or talking incessantly to convince the dealer or pit boss that you can't possibly be counting with all that distraction.

      There are quite a few professional card counters around, but they're more likely to have honed their skills by taking acting lessons rather than memory courses...

    3. Re:Casinos! by supmylO · · Score: 1

      Sounds like someone read "Bringing Down the House." I'd recommend BDtH to all, a very interesting read about a few card counters and their experiences.

  48. Re:1000 digits in an hour not particularly impress by hugesmile · · Score: 5, Informative
    no no no

    0=s or z,
    1=t or d
    2=n
    3=m
    4=r
    5=l
    6=j, sh, ch
    7=hard c, k
    8=f, ph
    9=p or b

    Called the Major System, it's been around for hundreds of years (as I recall, haha).

    In college I could memorize a deck of cards on clock-ticks. 52 seconds for a deck.

    A more impressive trick (to most people) is to have the person shuffle the deck, take out 5 cards and put them in their pocket.

    I flip through the remaining 47 card for 30 seconds, and tell them what's in their pocket. (Loraine / Lucas explain how to do this one in the memory book). It's not hard, but takes practice.

    After that, I found girls, and quit doing the geek memory thing. You don't want girls to know that you have a good memory - then you lose all your excuses for forgetting to call them, forgetting anniversaries, etc.

  49. The obvious solution... by abb3w · · Score: 2
    ...is for the Slashdot editors to offer the winner a position.

    --
    //Information does not want to be free; it wants to breed.
  50. good thing I looked... by darkonc · · Score: 1

    or I woulda been moderated 'redundant' for posting Yet Another Joke about forgetting how to get to the competition.

    --
    Sometimes boldness is in fashion. Sometimes only the brave will be bold.
  51. Re:The Human Brain by LokieLizzy · · Score: 1

    I agree with the two AC's. Stop propping yourself up, buddy. This is slashdot. We already know just how 'special' we are. You're no better than any of us :^)

    --
    My digital rights don't need management.
  52. Re:1000 digits in an hour not particularly impress by aralin · · Score: 1

    I was wondering about the lowest number of bits in which you can stick the full order of a 52 card deck into. So far I can do it in 253 bits of information. Thats about 64 hexadecimal digit number or 78 decimal digits. So you need only some 780 decimal digits to remember order of 10 decks of cards. Of course, if they are all shuffled together, its much more.

    --
    If programs would be read like poetry, most programmers would be Vogons.
  53. Re:Memrization: It Seems to be a Minimum Requireme by pilkul · · Score: 1
    An easy trick, I find, for remembering numbers is looking at their properties. E.g. are they prime? Are they squares? Are the digits increasing or decreasing? Are there any repeating digits? Etc. Don't just repeat it over and over in your mind: think about it. The more different ways you think about a number, the likelier it'll be that you remember it.

    Of course this isn't nearly as powerful as the methods of these champions, but it's a good trick for those of us who don't have days to practice assocating numbers with biplanes.

  54. Re:Congress To Open Hearings On Memory Championshi by mehu · · Score: 1

    555-1212 is also the number for directory information (the same as 411, only you can dial an area code first).

  55. My memory may suck... by AvantLegion · · Score: 1
    ... but my virtual memory rocks. *pats pad of paper*

  56. memorized zip codes by marksilverman · · Score: 5, Interesting

    probably the best street performer I ever saw pulled 10 or 15 people out of the audience, asking each one for their home zip code. Then he took each of them in turn, told them exactly where they live, and even mentioned restaurants and bars that they probably frequent. I was living in Manchester, England at the time (and we were in Nevada) so I thought I could stump him, but he nailed it. He got people from all over the US, Canada, Europe, the Middle East, and Asia. He produced the specific city or town, not just the country. Now that's a good memory!

    As I recall, he calls himself "the zip code guy".

  57. Re:Congress To Open Hearings On Memory Championshi by rednip · · Score: 1

    hey, that's my number, at least according to Best Buy, and RadioShack!

    --
    The force that blew the Big Bang continues to accelerate.
  58. Re:The Human Brain by poopdeville · · Score: 2, Funny

    If I had mod points, I would have probably saved them for something better. But picturing Chris Rock saying...

    Metric spaces, metric spaces. Met-ric spaces.

    These things are all over the place now. You know the Poles have their own sorts of metric spaces. Polish spaces. Have you heard about these? They're completely metrizable separable topological spaces. What kind of an idiot do you have to be to name a separable space after your own country?


    made me laugh. Oh well, to each his own.

    --
    After all, I am strangely colored.
  59. Re:The Human Brain by Capt.+Dick+Jackman · · Score: 1
    I don't think of Chris Rock as a topologist. I see him more as an analyst in a classic Richard Pryor sense. George Carlin would make a great algebraist kind of comic. I'm at a loss currently for a topologist comedian.

    I think you could spend a better part of a weekend discussing different comics cracking jokes about different areas in mathematics. Anything to distract from studying for quals! lol

    --
    Anyone who isn't confused really doesn't understand the situation.
  60. Re:1000 digits in an hour not particularly impress by dmadole · · Score: 1

    I was wondering about the lowest number of bits in which you can stick the full order of a 52 card deck into. So far I can do it in 253 bits of information. Thats about 64 hexadecimal digit number or 78 decimal digits. So you need only some 780 decimal digits to remember order of 10 decks of cards.

    I can do it in 226 bits; I would be surprised if it can be done in less.

    But the manipulations required to encode/decode that sort of compressed representation is so complex it is useless as a mental technique unless you were the Rain Man and then you probably don't need it anyway.

  61. Re:1000 digits in an hour not particularly impress by 1_interest_1 · · Score: 1

    I am Rain Man.

    So said I.

  62. The downsides.. by mchawi · · Score: 1

    Lines they could never use again:

    Honey, I forgot your birthday....

    I really was going to call you the next day - but I forgot your number.

    I was going to get you that more expensive present, but I couldn't remember where it came from.

    I'm sorry boss, I forgot about that deadline.

    The expectations would be so high nobody would ever believe them if they said they forgot something.

  63. Re:Memrization: It Seems to be a Minimum Requireme by magefile · · Score: 1

    And if you audiate it (that is, "hear" it in your mind), does it have a rhythm?

  64. Re:1000 digits in an hour not particularly impress by aralin · · Score: 1
    Yeah, I got two results with 253 bits using two different algorithms, but then I devised a different algorithm that uses only 216 bits. I might have misses 2-3 bits there, but not likely. Its using the sequence number of the card, so it can needs to record numbers 1-52, 1-51, ... so instead of using 6 bits for every number, down to 32, I group few of them together, like the first 4 numbers on base 52, which uses only 23 bits, instead of 24. The next few numbers are base 48 and so on. Its right the calculations are non-trivial.

    But for the 253 I actually used an algorithm thats very easy to process. First 51 bits tell you if card is red or black, next 25 tell you for red cards if its heart or diamond, next 25 tell for black, .. then 4*12 bits to say low or high card and so on. I think I could reconstruct the deck pretty fast from that.

    --
    If programs would be read like poetry, most programmers would be Vogons.
  65. Good memories, but they are no Einsteins... by michaeldot · · Score: 1

    I read an account of an interview between a reporter and Einstein. At the end, the reporter asked for Einstein's phone number so he could phone later if he needed to check something for the article.

    Einstein replied that he couldn't remember his number, but it didn't matter, because it was in the phone book.

    Smart man, Albert!

  66. Re:1000 digits in an hour not particularly impress by Beryllium+Sphere(tm) · · Score: 1

    Google's calculator says that 52 factorial is 226 bits long. (Searching for ln(52 factorial)/ln(2) and getting an answer is brutally cool). So there's an information theoretic lower bound assuming that all orderings are equally probable.

  67. Re:Memrization: It Seems to be a Minimum Requireme by michaeldot · · Score: 1

    Yes, for secretaries and PR people. But they were all sent off on the B-ark, weren't they?

    As a few people have posted now, Einstein had a terrible memory for trivial stuff like this. But who has done more to advance civilization:

    The guy who can say, "Hey Bob, how you been these past 9 months, are you still at (618) 555-2324, and how are those 3 children of yours?"

    Or the guy who developed the General Theory of Relativity...

  68. uh... by Zsinj · · Score: 1

    I... am so confused. I can count cards well enough, but if there is some really intense system of counting cards that u guys are using here (that is easy) please explain it in easier terms for I am only slightly smarter than a simpleton :P [and probably younger and less experienced than most of you... ]

    Hey, we all have to learn from someone, right?

    1. Re:uh... by Teddy+Beartuzzi · · Score: 1
      Start with four numbers in your head. Make sure you know the suit order, for example I always think Spades, Diamonds, Clubs, Hearts.
      0 0 0 0

      First card comes up, six of spades. Add six to the Spade number
      6 0 0 0

      Second card comes up, 4 of hearts. Add four to the heart count
      6 0 0 4

      Third card, jack of spades, add 11 to the spades
      17 0 0 4

    2. Re:uh... by Zsinj · · Score: 1

      yeah, i got that system, but its mainly the word 'modulo' that I don't understand...

      "You can sum the numerical values modulo 13, and sum the suits (arbitrary assignment of suits to values 1,2,3,4) modulo 4. The missing card is the one which if added would give you 0 for your sum modulo 13, and 2 for your sum modulo 4.

      This requires keeping track of one number up to 12 and one number up to 3, instead of four numbers up to 91 for your method."

      that one ;P

    3. Re:uh... by nizo · · Score: 1
      I always think Spades, Diamonds, Clubs, Hearts

      Or you could think Clubs, Diamonds, Hearts, Spades (alphabetical). One less thing to "remember" :-)

  69. Re:Congress To Open Hearings On Memory Championshi by tomsuchy · · Score: 1

    Also, in some regions (like 201, my former digs), you can do 555-5454 (might require an area code prefix), and it'll prompt you for a phone number and, if the number is listed, it'll tell you the name and address of the person that registered that line.

    At least it did that a few years ago, haven't tried since.

    --
    this isn't a sig. i type this (including the two dashes), every time i post, just to make it look like a sig.
  70. Re:Congress To Open Hearings On Memory Championshi by fireman+sam · · Score: 1

    Interesting, when was this introduced as the Ghostbusters phone number (from around 1980) is 555-2368.

    --
    it is only after a long journey that you know the strength of the horse.
  71. One Bit per Second by irchans · · Score: 1
    I notice that it took about 180 seconds for the best contestants to memorize a card deck. What's their bandwidth? The amount of information in a card deck is log(52!)/log(2) = 225 bits. That's 1.25 bits per second.

    What about the number lists? The best contestants memorized about 100 digits in 5 minutes. 100 digits contain log(10^100) / log(2) = 332 bits. That's 1.1 bits per second.

    So, over a lifetime, the most anyone can memorize is about (1 bit/sec)*(3600 sec/hr)*(15 hr/day)*(365 day/year)*(80 years/lifetime) = 1.6 Gigabits = 200 Megabytes. Hmm.

    1. Re:One Bit per Second by gnu-sucks · · Score: 1

      Thing is,

      You're assuming the human brain works in binary. I think its safe to say, that I can memorize a '0' as easily as a '9'. Putting that in terms of binary, I can memorize '0' as easily as '1001'. Because we're brought up in base-10, I am going to assume our memorization works on the same system.

      Wouldn't it be strange if certain numbers were easier to remember than others? If that were the case, and a common factor was discovered in the numbers which were easy to remember, we might discover more about how the brain really thinks of math.

      The Mayans, for example, used base 5. So why did they pick that?...

    2. Re:One Bit per Second by gnu-sucks · · Score: 1

      ...right, and I'm just saying, maybe the amount of 'bits' isn't completely appropriate - we don't know if the human mind works in bits, or in another base.

      Either way, its intriguing to me.

  72. Re:1000 digits in an hour not particularly impress by sublimespot · · Score: 1

    Im glad to see this post. I also had the Loraine memory system and had a lot of fun with it in my teen years.

  73. Easy by Skeezix · · Score: 1

    Guys, this stuff really isn't that hard. There is no such thing as a "bad memory." Just an untrained one. Seriously, anyone with half a brain can learn to memorize long-digit numbers or the order of a deck of cards. I consider myself a person of average intelligence and yet I can take a randomly shuffled deck of cards and view each card in order once for less than a second and then list the cards in order or name a specific card by it's index. It just takes training. People often attribute these sorts of feats to raw ability, but the truth is you can vastly improve your ability to remember through practice.

  74. Re:1000 digits in an hour not particularly impress by dmadole · · Score: 1

    Yeah, I got two results with 253 bits using two different algorithms, but then I devised a different algorithm that uses only 216 bits.

    No, you need to recheck your math, you can't do it in 216.

    I would guess your solution won't even do it in the optimal 226 since your grouping wastes a fraction of a bit in each step due to the grouping of cards and there's only a small fraction of a bit to spare in the 226 solution.

  75. Re:Congress To Open Hearings On Memory Championshi by mangu · · Score: 1
    how much the *AA would panic if every song or movie you heard or saw was a permanent part


    Why? Why would the Alcoholics Anonymous object about that?

  76. Re:The Human Brain by mangu · · Score: 1
    Einstein's brain was probably wired completely different. I bet he would forget to pickup milk on the way home


    Or maybe not. If Einstein were so absolutely, magically, intelligent as many people believe, then he would have unified gravitation theory with quantum mechanics. What people in general don't realize is how cooperative science is. Einstein didn't create his theories out of nothing, his work was based on a lot of other theories. As Newton said, he stood on the shoulders of giants. So, maybe his brain wasn't so special, maybe he just studied harder the work of those who came before him.

  77. Re:The Human Brain by menkhaura · · Score: 1

    Four gigs of memory are almost useless with a 486...

    --
    Stupidity is an equal opportunity striker.
    Fellow slashdotter Bill Dog
  78. Memorisation vs. knowledge and understanding by CarpetShark · · Score: 1

    Errm... that's not remembering anything new. It's simply recalling details of your office that you work in every day.

    If I read out numbers that seem meaningless to you, and you use the people in your office as a mnemonic to remember them, that's different.

    But personally, I've little interest in rote learning. I'd much rather understand how the world works and be able to explain it from principles than to simply have meaningless tables of data in my head. The former is applicable to more than just pre-determined questions.

    For example, which would you rather know: the date at which world war two broke out, out the sequence of events since world war two, and their causality? With knowledge, you can backtrack to the right year from other dates you do remember, and, much more, you can actually use the information for new ideas and insights.

  79. Computer geeks and memory loss? by CarpetShark · · Score: 1

    I wonder how many computer geeks have memory troubles? I have a theory that all those requesters and reminders and pop-up hints help us so much that they make us forget how to remember things. My memory is like a sieve these days. Although it could be other things, so I'm not sure.

  80. Re:Congress To Open Hearings On Memory Championshi by premchai21 · · Score: 1

    But some of them are. For instance, I used to have a copy of U2's "Walk On" available, which is no longer the case. However, I can recall it internally with relative exactitude, down to the entrances of the background parts, vocal inflections, effects, and so forth. Moreover, it's represented in structured form, not as pure audio; when bits become less exact it's more similar to human memory becoming less exact (e.g. forgetting words from the lyric, playing it back in the wrong key since I don't usually bother to have a pitch reference handy) than classical-computer memory dropping bits (e.g. lots of noise in the audio stream).

    I suppose I'm a sort of musical person, so this may not be the norm, but it is certainly not impossible for humans to store music and video in memory, at higher or lower quality as desired.

  81. Harry Lorayne is your friend. by ninejaguar · · Score: 1
    You can remember it yourself with the help of the best memory teacher around. If you don't like to read, there's always the software, but the books are cheaper.

    = 9J =

  82. I meant to attend this year by nizo · · Score: 1

    I was planning on going, but sadly I forgot which day it was on.

  83. Ob. quote by phozz+bare · · Score: 1

    "Where's Ram?"

    "He didn't make it."

    phozz

  84. Re:1000 digits in an hour not particularly impress by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny
    Yeah, you're right. Why use a system that has been developed over hundreds of years, refined for multiple languages, improved, documented, and has many, many websites, courses, and lots of software devoted to helping you practice it?

    Your Mr. Magoo method sounds much better.

  85. how about reciting the powers of 2 for an hour? by deepbluegeek · · Score: 1

    A few years ago at a local watering hole we had the pleasure of hanging out with a brilliant but misguided man nicknamed 'Fletch'. After several drinks someone dared all to recite the powers of two for a whole hour. Well, we all laughed, except Fletch. He started rambling them off... "2, 4, 8, 16, 32....". He must have been doing that for about 20 minutes before he gave up, took a last swig of his beer and then left. Beyond 32768, I had no idea if he was correct with any of them or not, but it sure was interesting and fairly funny to hear.

  86. Re:Congress To Open Hearings On Memory Championshi by Lars+T. · · Score: 1
    To quote your source:
    Finally, we'd be remiss if we didn't mention 555-LIST, an ongoing project to compile all the 555 numbers used in TV and movies. So whether you're trying to dial Agent Scully at Quantico (555-2804) or Ned Flanders in Springfield (555-8904), you'll find the numbers of all your favorite fictional characters.
    Both (quite recent) examples don't follow the new rule. So even if they stuck with them for consistency, the rule can't be older than 15 years.

    So who do you get when you call 555-2804 in Quantico (or anywhere else for that matter ;-?

    --

    Lars T.

    To the guy who modded me down from perfect to terrible Karma - Apple haters still suck