Slashdot Mirror


Ask Jeeves Bought for $2 billion

RMX writes "CNet's reporting that Ask Jeeves is being bought by InterActive Corp for $2 billion. Ask Jeeves (ask.com, excite.com, iwon.com) and InterActive Corp (expedia, ticketmaster, match.com, citysearch). This marks a nice comeback for Ask Jeeves, whose stock was quite a roller coaster ride during the 2000-2003 .com crash. Are the good times back?"

168 comments

  1. IWon is right! by bigtallmofo · · Score: 4, Funny

    Do you think the creators of www.iwon.com had any idea they'd be in store for a $2,000,000,000 windfall?

    --
    I'm a big tall mofo.
    1. Re:IWon is right! by pbranes · · Score: 1

      They could sell a ketchup popsicle to a woman wearing white gloves

    2. Re:IWon is right! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They were bought out well before this happened. I'm posting anonymously because I know the details.

    3. Re:IWon is right! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      They could sell a ketchup popsicle to a woman wearing white gloves

      Or a chocolate-covered banana to a baboon?

  2. Did anyone by OAB_X · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Really ever use ask jeeves? I mean, I used it once or twice several years ago, but is it really that popular to be bought for 2 billion? I cant think of anyone who uses it consistently, or even rarely.

    1. Re:Did anyone by REBloomfield · · Score: 4, Informative

      all the non-technical staff here do, they seem to think that you can just ask it anything and it knows the answer. I've seen some really bad full sentence queries get put into it....

    2. Re:Did anyone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      I don't know. Did they?

    3. Re:Did anyone by 0x461FAB0BD7D2 · · Score: 3, Funny

      Does anyone really ever use ask jeeves?

      I asked Jeeves, and I got this:
      Many people use Ask Jeeves because it has a picture of a butler

    4. Re:Did anyone by Reignking · · Score: 3, Informative

      Homer Simpson uses Ask Jeeves. He wrote on a Flintstones map last night "Dino. Short for dinosaur? Ask Jeeves."

      --
      One man's Funny is another man's Offtopic.
    5. Re:Did anyone by Stevyn · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Well just think of it this way. If google has more competition, then it will need to create an even better product in the future. I use google exclusively and I think it's a great search engine. However, I would not want it to push every other search engine out of the water. Then they'd never innovate and it'd eventually suck.

      So while I don't use ask jeeves, I'm glad some people do.

    6. Re:Did anyone by northcat · · Score: 2, Interesting

      People seem to think that you can ask real questions with ask jeeves. The results I get with questions on ask jeeves are actually worse than results I get through google for the same query (question).

    7. Re:Did anyone by garcia · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I can tell you that the only time I was getting hits from Ask Jeeves is when I was banning a stalker from viewing my gallery. Ask Jeeves had apparently indexed my gallery at one point (ignoring the robots.txt) and had not removed it at any time.

      I started seeing these OBNOXIOUS log entries with referrers from ask.com (see here).

      I finally had to email ask.com to have them removed. They ignored my first request and then finally removed it after a repeated request. They certainly weren't as easy to deal w/as Google's removal tool.

      Personally? I'd never use anything other than Google.

    8. Re:Did anyone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

      I think they should be fairly concerned that the first hit is the Darwin Awards.

    9. Re:Did anyone by yelvington · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It's not just about AskJeeves, it's about the entire stable of sites/brands/technologies that it owns: Teoma (search technology), Excite, iWon, MyWay and Bloglines. In that collection, there's actually more usage outside the Ask brand that inside it. Here's a recent snapshot.

    10. Re:Did anyone by Bronz · · Score: 0


      I could be wrong, but I believe Ask Jeeves has a few large corporate clients that use it for a kind of "auto-FAQ"/support system within their own sites ... but I still wonder if the posted didn't mean 2 *million*.

    11. Re:Did anyone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So exactly what kind of training does one need to become a live-in butler at a nice estate? Doesn't seem like a half-bad job, better than working on the cube-farm anyway.

    12. Re:Did anyone by Ohreally_factor · · Score: 1

      Why can't there be a search engine with a picture of a cuntler or a titler? I suppose there are those who would prefer a picture of a cockler, as well.

      What about MY needs?

      --
      It's not offtopic, dumbass. It's orthogonal.
    13. Re:Did anyone by rtt · · Score: 3, Informative


      From The Register:
      Ask Jeeves is the seventh most popular search site in the UK with 1.9 per cent of total searches, Google is a long way in front with 63 per cent. Figures from Hitwise.

      Nope... no one uses Ask Jeeves.

    14. Re:Did anyone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      lets have a look at 2 differnt results with 1 word. the word i will use is the word "Test"

      http://web.ask.com/web?q=test&qsrc=0&o=0/ http://www.google.co.uk/search?hl=en&q=test&btnG=G oogle+Search&meta=/

      what one do you find most usefull?

    15. Re:Did anyone by GeckoX · · Score: 1

      He also revealed that he spends his mornings at work googling his own name. If it wasn't official before, it is now: Google is a verb!

      --
      No Comment.
    16. Re:Did anyone by hackstraw · · Score: 2, Funny

      Really ever use ask jeeves? I mean, I used it once or twice several years ago, but is it really that popular to be bought for 2 billion?

      Good question. So I asked Jeeves the question, and didn't get much of an answer either -- What is the value of the ask jeeves website?

      Interesting enough, google had better results on the question than Jeeves did.

    17. Re:Did anyone by barzok · · Score: 1

      We use Ask Jeeves for all our internal sites (we purchased their JeevesOne product) and it works fairly well.

    18. Re:Did anyone by ch-chuck · · Score: 1

      this guy did, once.

      --
      try { do() || do_not(); } catch (JediException err) { yoda(err); }
    19. Re:Did anyone by oliverthered · · Score: 1

      Ah, all in the marketing.

      I've tried it from time to time when google isn't palying fair but all I ever get back are the top twnety adds that have nothing to do with the query I typed.

      Try, what is the time?

      I'm from the UK, you can tell because a UK company hold my IP block.

      You get....
      Biometric time clocks
      South Carolina, United States current local time
      The official U.S. time
      and finally....
      The World Clock - Time Zones

      If I try the UK only I get this come up second

      A web page that calculates GMT using you local clock, surley if my PC clock was correct I wouldn't be looking for something to tell me what the time is.

      --
      thank God the internet isn't a human right.
    20. Re:Did anyone by antic · · Score: 1

      I've been too busy using Aks Jeeves, the original's more attitude-driven alternative:

      Aks Jeeves -- you'll need Flash and an indifference to coarse language...

      "Shut the fuck up motherfucker. Can't you see I'm busy?" -- gold!

      --
      'Thats they exact same thing a banana wrench monkey.'
    21. Re:Did anyone by northcat · · Score: 1

      Why don't you try a less vague word word like "word"? Or maybe "e"?

    22. Re:Did anyone by kesuki · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I use ask.com anytime google pulls up too many sites to sift through.. the Ask engine is designed to anylize english sentances, and return the best matches that are relevant to an ENTIRE sentance. Google is good, but it's just a really fast keyword search tool. keywords will often times return too many results, which is why google has Page Rank technology, which extended the life and value of keyword searching... but it's still a primative form of searching... it's like going to a card catalog of the entire knowledge of the human existance and asking for everything with the term 'free money' in it... Asking google for 'free money' returns a ton of various sites, in order of popularity, Ask.com when asked "how can i earn free money?" after about 20 advertised links (which are clearly marked) it lists ONLY free money websites. no links to books, no links to gambling sites... nothing but what you were looking for..
      Ask.com has the next generation of search engine technology, if you combined ask.com's technology with page ranking technology, you'd have the best possible search technology.

    23. Re:Did anyone by thegambler416 · · Score: 1

      I never used it but according to register some surfers do: "Ask Jeeves is the seventh most popular search site in the UK with 1.9 per cent of total searches, Google is a long way in front with 63 per cent"

    24. Re:Did anyone by Scrameustache · · Score: 1

      Homer Simpson uses Ask Jeeves. He wrote on a Flintstones map last night "Dino. Short for dinosaur? Ask Jeeves."

      I know, I shut my TV off in disgust at that point.
      Wasting valuable joke time with advertising for inferior products... bleah!

      --

      You can't take the sky from me...

    25. Re:Did anyone by Ulric · · Score: 1
      Same story here: tried it a few times, didn't see any advantages over a "normal" search engine.

      It is however true that many people have a hard time writing good queries. On one of the services here, the top query is for the web address of the service, which is a strange thing to look for if you've obviously already found it.

      The second most frequent query is for the biggest competitor.

    26. Re:Did anyone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Haha Jeeves is awsome and mutch better then Google and New MSN search. Now i wonder how mutch the broker make a month..

      I checked out Jeeves a year ago (and today). Nothing new....

    27. Re:Did anyone by el_benito · · Score: 1

      Homer does!

      Lisa: "Wait! There's writing at the bottom! 'Dino - short for dinosaur? Remember to Ask Jeeves"
      --
      http://liquidben.com - Aspiring to an 'under construction' gif
    28. Re:Did anyone by sponga · · Score: 1

      As a kid in middle school years ago we used to always be advised by the teachers to use Ask Jeeves, but once i showed the teacher that there were much better alternatives than that they soon changed.

    29. Re:Did anyone by jedrek · · Score: 1

      This episode of the Simpsons was so bad it made me cringe.

      Oh look, Homer bought an RV! I haven't seen this in... 16 years.

    30. Re:Did anyone by Ilgaz · · Score: 1

      Its roots are in MIT, a much bigger AI project.

      I bet some guys from there were/is affiliated with that lab.

      http://start.csail.mit.edu/

      Its there since '93 ;)

    31. Re:Did anyone by nazzdeq · · Score: 1

      Maybe once or twice when it first came out. Seems pretty useless to me. The 2 billion dollar acquisition is the only thing dumber. That has to be the most worthless thing ever purchased for 2 bilion. -Nazz

    32. Re:Did anyone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thanks for the link, it was hilarious.

    33. Re:Did anyone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      'The World Clock - Time Zones' is nice. But if you know how to convert from UTC to your local time (easy in GB) then you can use time.gov (a.k.a. "The official U.S. time").

  3. Great! by spywhere · · Score: 3, Funny

    Wider distribution for the nightmarish mix of malware provided through AskJeeves!

    1. Re:Great! by TheViffer · · Score: 1

      Actually I look for this to be the death of it. I had thought that selling Excite to @home for 6 billion was the biggest rip-off to every hit the web, but this one might take the cake.

      Here is a fun one.

      What is the fastest Pentium Processor?

      And (drum roll please) the first Web result is .....

      How Fast Is The 400MHz Pentium* II Processor?

      I'll stick with asking G instead.

      --
      -- Knowing too much can get you killed, but knowing who knows too much can make you rich.
    2. Re:Great! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yeah, great...

      The last time I used iwon.com, it took a week to get all the spyware off my PC. Neither Spybot or Adaware could get it all off, I had to edit the registry and delete files manually. I wouldn't pay .50 for this company.

    3. Re:Great! by Golias · · Score: 2, Funny

      And the first Google hit for the same question (after the paid ad):

      Intel Announces Fastest Pentium® II Xeon(TM) Processor

      Wow, Google found a CPU which is 50 MHz faster. A clear win!

      --

      Information wants to be anthropomorphized.

    4. Re:Great! by cyngus · · Score: 1

      And the second result from Ask Jeeves is to a page that no longer exists.

  4. Let's hope so! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Bring on the good times. I'm going to start a search engine called askstrongbad.com and it's gonna make billions and be the best thing out there since that techno song I heard one time!

    1. Re:Let's hope so! by Ubergrendle · · Score: 2, Funny

      I would actually use Ask Strongbad (e.g. "what goes best with a tuna sandwich?") as the response would be much more illuminating (and useful) than Ask Jeeves.

      I would even pay for the burninator plug-in.

      --
      John Maynard Keynes: "When the facts change, I change my mind. What do you do?"
  5. The Poster Askes by Kushy · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Are the good times back?

    Yes they are just not for the USA. Its a good time for India and China, with cheap ass CEO's CFO's CTO's, all outsourcing.

    I really do not see any 'good times' ahead for IT ppl in the US.

    --
    "The word "genius" isn't applicable in football. A genius is a guy like Norman Einstein," - Joe Theisman
    1. Re:The Poster Askes by CSMastermind · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Well I must admit that outsourcing has become a problem but the problem lays in how we're dealing with it as well. Now I'll be the first to admit that I hate the large multi-billion dollar transnational corperations. I don't have a hard time believing that they're corrupt and just plain evil but I also must see the fact that there's a way around this.

      On a whole if your IT job was outsourced than it was proablly not a very unique or important job. The 1990s saw a rise in a lot of people getting trained and certified in computers so they could hop on the bandwagon and get a low level IT job, now that the economy is down they're finding their jobs being outsourced.

      If you don't want your job outsourced, then gain a valubale skill so that they can't afford to outsource you, work harder, smarter, and in general better than any overseas empolyee that they can find.

    2. Re:The Poster Askes by CSMastermind · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Well I'm not going to disagree that the US's current economic plan makes absolutly no sense but the majority American debt is owed to other Americans. The national debt you're referring to comes mostly from the US government buying on credit from US corperations.

      As for people outsourcing to us, you have to realize that while the dollar is growing weaker, this does in many ways repersent a positive injection into our economy because it helps balance the trade deficit. The reason people won't outsource to here is because even in our current state America repersents a place of inovation and invent simply unmatched in many parts of the world. As long as the new technology is here first we shouldn't have a problem.

    3. Re:The Poster Askes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You need to learn the first rule of banking.

      When you owe the bank one million dollars, you have a problem. When you owe the bank one billion dollars, the bank has a problem.

    4. Re:The Poster Askes by Ohreally_factor · · Score: 1, Funny

      Maybe time to immigrate? Both China and India have big borders and coastlines, so it shouldn't be too hard to sneak in. Fitting in might be a little harder. What's hindi for wetback? (for those who choose to swim ashore).

      --
      It's not offtopic, dumbass. It's orthogonal.
    5. Re:The Poster Askes by wheelbarrow · · Score: 1

      Let's assume we all accept your premise that out sourcing is a bad outcome resulting from 'cheap ass' CEO's. What should the American government do to put a stop to it?

    6. Re:The Poster Askes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The majority of jobs in any industry are not very unique or important jobs. Some workers can train to become experts in their field but what are the other 95% of workers supposed to do? Everyone can't become an expert and there aren't enough specialized jobs available for them even if they could. The majority of IT jobs can be outsourced and eventually they will be. Working harder and smarter might help keep you around for a few years when they fire 2/3 of your workmates. All it means you'll end up doing the job of 3 people in a severely understaffed environment until you burn out or they fire you and move the entire operation to India.

    7. Re:The Poster Askes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Outsourcing is not as big an issue as you want it to be. The entire Indian IT industry only employs about 1 million people. That would cover more than just programmers.

    8. Re:The Poster Askes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then you need to look harder. They're a'coming. Give it 18-24 months and it'll make 1998 look like a blip on the economic radar for overpaid, undertalented youth.

  6. I'd say it's a good thing by CSMastermind · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I think this represents a good thing for Ask Jeeves. I remember 5 years or so ago in school when we had to take a class on internet basics and we learned about screach engines. Ask Jeeves was my faviorite because it was one of the few that made sense. But over time I learned about Google and www.alltheweb.com, and I stopped using Ask because I found it's layout overbearing and hard to navigate. Ask also suffered from a poor marketing stragity. I think that if they can reorganize the company then it will be a very positive thing.

    1. Re:I'd say it's a good thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Strategy.

      You use "it's" when the proper possessive form of "it" is "its". "It's" is a contraction of "it is".

      I realize "screach engines" was a typo.

      Good luck in the future!

      Your Friendly Neighborhood Spelling and Grammar Nazi

    2. Re:I'd say it's a good thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You know what? Get a life.

    3. Re:I'd say it's a good thing by Scrameustache · · Score: 1

      I remember 5 years or so ago in school when we had to take a class on internet basics and we learned about screach engines. Ask Jeeves was my faviorite because it was one of the few that made sense. But over time I learned about Google and www.alltheweb.com, and I stopped using Ask because I found it's layout overbearing and hard to navigate.

      5 years ago it acted as a sort of meta search engine, it would basically pull results from other sources and rate them for you (like, if you asked a question about movies, the imdb page was in the top 10 somewhere). But around 5 years ago, it changed. All of a sudden all it's results were obvious paid-for content and you couldn't force Jeeves to give you anything different. If you wanted to know where to BUY things, jeeves was it, but if you wanted search results that fit what you were looking for. No.

      I don't want google to be a monopoly, but I don't see a reason to use anything else.

      --

      You can't take the sky from me...

  7. So... by Mindjiver · · Score: 4, Funny

    did anyone care to ask Jeeves what he thinks of this?

    --
    I know not what course others may take; but as for me, give me liberty or give me death!
    1. Re:So... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ok so I asked:

      me> What do you think of all this?

      Jeeves> You'd think with all my video game experience that I'd be more prepared for this ...

      So I assume that Jeeves plays video games when people are not asking questions. Hmmm, does seem life-like.

    2. Re:So... by roman_mir · · Score: 1

      due to growing /. interest he is unavailable to comment.

  8. myway by platos_beard · · Score: 3, Informative

    Askjeeves owns myway.com, a portal with the motto "no banners, no ads, no kidding" Let's hope they don't mess with that.

    --
    What's a sig?
    1. Re:myway by dezcola · · Score: 1

      I don't believe that's a concern just yet. Diller has munched up many properties. The information has been silo'd site by site the entire time.

      I believe this to be due to the forceful marriage of technology teams. It takes time for developers to warm up to each other. Developers wisely tend to wait until all the proper NDAs land on their desk before wantonly handing out their knowledge. This creates delays. The benefits/detriments of each site's technology won't filter down to development for several years. Aside from branding from one site to another, I haven't witnessed sharing of technology in the InterActive family.

      This doesn't mean that we won't hear popping sounds of heads coming out when Interactive shareholders realize that costs can be cut if tech is shared or IOW developers axed...within the family.
  9. Natural Progression of Business... by ciroknight · · Score: 4, Interesting

    It seems like when some new, highly exploitable technology comes out, hundreds of little companies start out. Those companies slowly die out, and the ones that are left, are gobbled up by the largest of the remaining companies, and it leaves room for the new, baby companies again.

    Holds true for cars, computers, and now, .coms. Interesting..

    --
    "Victory means exit strategy, and it's important for the President to explain to us what the exit strategy is." G.W.Bush
    1. Re:Natural Progression of Business... by NardofDoom · · Score: 1

      Let's just hope it's the same for commercial space flight.

      --
      You have two hands and one brain, so always code twice as much as you think!
    2. Re:Natural Progression of Business... by twiddlingbits · · Score: 1

      A 5 Mod? No way..Tell me what new car company have you seen in the last 25 years? DeLorean was the only one and it went under. And I didn't realize cars were ever a "highly exploitable technology" even in the Model T days. How about computers? IBM went down a bit, Dell, Gateway, HP and others crept in but there have been NO new serious players in over 10 years. As for CPUs there hasn't been any new CPU chips mfgs in quite a while, speciality chips like DSPs and ASICs is where the new entries have been. Dot com's are too easy, anyone can start one these days. So, it's not a fair comparison with your other businesses. Dot coms can be started on a few thousands of dollars, computers and cars take millions. Which is one BIG reason why you don't see new entrants. The cost along with firmly entrenched competition creates an enormous barrier to entry. You are all over the place with your arguments versus your examples. I don't dispute that new technlogies can spawn new business opportunities, its just that cars, computers and dot coms are not good examples.

  10. Editing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What is a "who'se"?

    1. Re:Editing by Toy+G · · Score: 2, Funny

      Yeah, it's "whose". 1) "Whose" -> "of someone" 2) "Who's" -> short for "who is" 3) "Who'se" -> ??? PROFIT!!

      --
      -- Let's go Viridian.
  11. Good going Jeeves! by AtariAmarok · · Score: 5, Funny

    With $2 billion in his pocket, maybe he can afford now to pay his OWN butler.

    --
    Don't blame Durga. I voted for Centauri.
    1. Re:Good going Jeeves! by KefabiMe · · Score: 1

      With $2 billion in his pocket, maybe he can afford now to pay his OWN butler.

      AskJeeves'Butler.com?

      AskJeeves'Secretary.com?

      Schedule AnAppointmentWithJeeves.com?

      HaveYourSecretaryCallJeeves'SecretaryAndThey'llD oLunch.com?

    2. Re:Good going Jeeves! by Heian-794 · · Score: 1

      AskJeeves'Butler.com?

      AskJeeves'Secretary.com?

      Schedule AnAppointmentWithJeeves.com?

      HaveYourSecretaryCallJeeves'SecretaryAndThey'llD oLunch.com? Wait a minute... can you have apostrophes in URLs? Anyone smart enough to squeeze $2 billion from someone for Ask Jeeves is probably wisse to these things.

  12. Bloglines too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Ask Jeeves, Inc. also owns Bloglines.

    Did InterActive own any blog type services prior to this acquisition?

  13. Good times again.... by Capt+James+McCarthy · · Score: 2, Funny

    Could be that everyone is consolidating so it will be easier for MS to just buy everything at one sale.

    --
    There are no loopholes. It's either legal or it's not.
    1. Re:Good times again.... by geoaxis · · Score: 1

      yeah ..I think its not just me..why are we suddenly hearing so many News of acquring?? is it the last ditch to save money or they see a bright future (corporations i mean)

      --
      geoaxis
  14. WTF?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

    OMFG!!! 2 billion? 2 BILLION??

    Thats it! The world has gone f*king crazy!

    What were these morons smoking? Whatever happened to having a workable business model?

    1. Re:WTF?? by SimonShine · · Score: 1

      > OMFG!!! 2 billion? 2 BILLION??

      I felt the same way. Reading through the news, Ask Jeeves was sold for $2 million with a b... er... go back.. go back.

      --
      Take off every 'ZIG' !!
  15. Let's get them out of the way.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    1. In soviet Russia, Jeeves asks YOU!

    2. In Korea, only old people ask Jeeves.

    3. I, for one, welcome our new butler overlords.

    and finally...

    4. I AM a butler, you insensitive clod!

    1. Re:Let's get them out of the way.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You missed Beowulf cluster of Butlers.

    2. Re:Let's get them out of the way.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      1. Buy Ask Jeeves (with net revenues of $17M) for $2,000M
      2. ???
      3. Profit!

    3. Re:Let's get them out of the way.. by smallguy78 · · Score: 1

      He's gay

      gay

      --
      Nothing costs nothing
  16. Don't worry. did you read the fine print? by AtariAmarok · · Score: 2, Funny
    "OMFG!!! 2 billion? 2 BILLION??"

    Did you read the fine print? The 2 billion dollars was paid in Flooz and online petfood sales company stock options.

    --
    Don't blame Durga. I voted for Centauri.
    1. Re:Don't worry. did you read the fine print? by Ohreally_factor · · Score: 1

      Ha ha! All those flooz don't add up to a hill of beenz!

      --
      It's not offtopic, dumbass. It's orthogonal.
  17. Has anyone asked the search engine? by pmasters · · Score: 3, Funny

    Actually they did:

    http://www.satirewire.com/features/satire-jeeves in terview.shtml

    1. Re:Has anyone asked the search engine? by Panaflex · · Score: 1

      That rocks!

      Pan

      --
      I said no... but I missed and it came out yes.
  18. Summary by northcat · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Ask Jeeves ( ask.com, excite.com , iwon.com ) and InterActive Corp ( expedia, ticketmaster, match.com, citysearch).

    That's not even a sentence.

    1. Re:Summary by tomstdenis · · Score: 1

      Picky, aren't ya?

      And WTF 2 billion? Is it actually *WORTH* that? I mean it's a crappy search engine tied to a database and a couple 486 DX's running the server...

      I mean hell just the HARDWARE that google owns is worth more than all that Ask Jeeves can put together [hardware/software and IP wise].

      I don't even think we're dealing with "real life" anymore. I mean why not just sell it for a billion cajillion dollars?

      And you can be sure that your "ticket fees" and other assorted fees at InterActive will get a nice "update" after this.

      Tom

      --
      Someday, I'll have a real sig.
    2. Re:Summary by Ohreally_factor · · Score: 1

      You were expecting copy editing before the dupe^Wsecond draft?

      --
      It's not offtopic, dumbass. It's orthogonal.
    3. Re:Summary by Sneftel · · Score: 1

      That's not even a sentence.

      Sure it is. It's telling you to ask Jeeves and InterActive Corp., that they can vouch for the story's authenticity. With Slashdot, it's best to double-check these things. :-D

      --
      The opinions stated herein do not necessarily represent those of anybody at all. Deal with it.
  19. Sounds about right... by magicclams · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Given that the company made about $86 million last year, the selling price ($1.9 billion) represents a price to earnings ratio of ~22...a bit on the high side, but not out of line with a company whose earnings more than doubled last year. Given that this is a profitable survivor acquiring another profitable survivor, I don't think this represents a slide back into the (good? bad?) old days of multi-billion dollar valuations for stocks that barely have a business plan. As for that profitability, it may seem odd to those of us who take it for granted that a query like "prescription drugs canada" makes more sense than "Where can I buy prescription drugs in Canada?", but we're tech geeks. Ask around..."Jeeves" is the portal of choice for the techno-phobic middle-aged and elderly, who typically have a much higher money-to-brains ratio than computer geeks.

    1. Re:Sounds about right... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      but not out of line with a company whose earnings more than doubled last year

      Surely you mean "who'se"?

    2. Re:Sounds about right... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      They didn't make $86M, they made $17.5M, putting the p/e ratio at a ridiculous 114.

    3. Re:Sounds about right... by DeadSea · · Score: 2, Insightful
      You say that people want to ask questions rather than put in search terms. There are a few things wrong with that:

      1. People hate typing. I would expect more people to enter "prescpt drugs CA" than "Where can I buy prescription drugs in Canada"
      2. Entering "Where can I buy prescription drugs in Canada" into google returns very relevent results. As a user, you don't need to know that google ignores the words "where", "can", "I", and "in".

      So maybe there is a place in the market for a search engine front end that specifically says "type in a question". But I really doubt that many people want to type that much. I certainly doubt that it should be based an shoddy results that Ask Jeeves seems to give.

      --
      Online Currency Converter with Current Exchange Rates

    4. Re:Sounds about right... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I use ask.com. They are pretty good. Actually I'll some resutls are better than google. And guys, you don' need to type in a sentence, nodody does that now.

  20. Are the good times back? Nope.... by i_want_you_to_throw_ · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Historically everytime there has been a new technology there has been a "bubble" (You didn't think the internet bubble was the first bubble did you?

    Money gets thrown in at a breakneck pace, there's a bubble for a few years and then KABOOM! Market implosion when reality finally hits.

    Then after the smoke clears and the dust settles a new golden age begins followed by consolidation. I think it's safe to say that we are in consolidation mode now. Now is the time that the lasting 1600 pound gorillas get formed. Interactive Corp is one of those gorillas along with Ebay and Amazon.

    1. Re:Are the good times back? Nope.... by Ohreally_factor · · Score: 1

      And I guess with the internet speeding everything up, the Golden Age happened so fast, I missed it when I got up to use the toilet. Damn. I hate when that happens. =(

      --
      It's not offtopic, dumbass. It's orthogonal.
    2. Re:Are the good times back? Nope.... by twiddlingbits · · Score: 1

      Good point, go read about the "South Sea Bubble" that occured in France (and England). And see how uncanny the resemblance is to the "dot com" bubble.

  21. Are they? by northcat · · Score: 1, Funny

    Are the good times back?

    Let's ask jeeves!

    1. Re:Are they? by coolcold · · Score: 1

      I don't ask jeeves, I usually ask clippy

      --
      I am harvesting funny/good quotes. Please help by putting them in your sigs :)
  22. Traffic costs are rising by adrianbye · · Score: 3, Insightful

    With the costs/value of traffic rising, sites that have a lot of traffic are being bought. Their value should increase significantly over the next few years. This is also why about.com was bought recently.

  23. Related article on The Register by sczimme · · Score: 1


    Complete with nifty headline:

    Ask Jeeves if it's been bought

    --
    I want to drag this out as long as possible. Bring me my protractor.
  24. Did anyone ever use Slashdot? by AtariAmarok · · Score: 1, Funny
    "I asked Jeeves, and I got this: Many people use Ask Jeeves because it has a picture of a butler"

    That seems similar to Slashdot. I asked it, and I got a picture of a butt. (insert tinyurl Goatse link here).

    --
    Don't blame Durga. I voted for Centauri.
  25. iWon is powered by google by drkich · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I find that kind of amusing.

  26. You won't see me using it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why would anyone use this service?

    As a palestinian .. I can tell you this, never trust a J... What? Jeeves?

    Oh, nevermind.

  27. Anybody else notice that.. by Abstract_Me · · Score: 0

    the simpsons mentioned ask jeeves last night? Maybe they knew something we didn't.

    1. Re:Anybody else notice that.. by Matt+Clare · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I noticed that too. Wasn't the situation that Bart and Lisa were reading Homer's map to the RV store and the directions said "Remember to Ask Jeeves".

      Anyone want to correct me? I didn't know there'd be a test when I watched it.

      To be fair, the episode also had Marge accussing Homer of doing nothing at work but Googling his own name.

      --
      .\.\att Clare
    2. Re:Anybody else notice that.. by Scrameustache · · Score: 1

      the simpsons mentioned ask jeeves last night? Maybe they knew something we didn't.

      Yes, they knew how much they got paid to insert that ad in their content.

      --

      You can't take the sky from me...

  28. Wow. by LouCifer · · Score: 1, Funny

    Somebody had $2BN burning a hole in their pocket eh?

    Looks like somebody got ripped off too.

    --
    Religion is for people afraid of going to hell.
  29. Save the 50 cents by AtariAmarok · · Score: 1
    "The last time I used iwon.com, it took a week to get all the spyware off my PC. Neither Spybot or Adaware could get it all off, I had to edit the registry and delete files manually. I wouldn't pay .50 for this company"

    Next time, save the 50 cents and use Mozilla Firefox. It is free, and has a lot fewer problems with browser-related malware. I should know. I am one of those who'se used it.

    --
    Don't blame Durga. I voted for Centauri.
    1. Re:Save the 50 cents by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Also doesn't work with any of the sites I need to use for business.

  30. Ask Jeeves? by eatmywake · · Score: 0

    whats this? I thought it was "Ask Slashdot"

  31. Paper money by Filik · · Score: 1
    From the article:

    Under the terms of the deal, IAC will issue 1.26 shares of its common stock for each share of Ask Jeeves common stock in a tax-free transaction

    Thus this doesn't really say anything at all about the real value. Just one bubble merging with another bubble. I would be more impressed if they offered to buy the shares with real money instead of shares in another company.

    1. Re:Paper money by Fjornir · · Score: 1
      IAC said that it intends to buy back at least 60 percent of the shares it plans to issue for acquisition through previously authorized share repurchase programs.

      So it'll work out to being a bit less than a 60% cash deal on a 1.85gigabuck purchase.

      Still a lot of real money.

      --
      I want a new world. I think this one is broken.
  32. Beekeeping in New Zealand! by imag0 · · Score: 1

    Q: So, Jeeves, what is it like being hooked into the internet?

    A: Beekeeping in New Zealand.

    Fucker can buy a lot of bees for 2 Billion.

  33. Funny (?) Ask Jeeves search results by LouCifer · · Score: 2, Funny
    --
    Religion is for people afraid of going to hell.
    1. Re:Funny (?) Ask Jeeves search results by dlZ · · Score: 1

      Answer to "Is Jeeves gay?" http://sp.ask.com/docs/about/isjeevesgay.html

      I liked the old answer that used to go to a fake 404 error page. "Error 404, none of your business"

      And yes, I know that search is immature. But I was hoping for the fake error message page to still be around.

      --
      rm -rf ./evidence @ punkcomp
    2. Re:Funny (?) Ask Jeeves search results by kindbud · · Score: 1

      Congratulations. Your post asking "why does Ask Jeeves suck so hard" is now the number one result for "why does Ask Jeeves suck so hard?"

      "why does Ask Jeeves suck so hard"

      --
      Edith Keeler Must Die
    3. Re:Funny (?) Ask Jeeves search results by LouCifer · · Score: 1

      Hahahaha!

      I honestly didn't know it would have that kind of result.

      That's rather humorous!

      --
      Religion is for people afraid of going to hell.
  34. Who'se by Golias · · Score: 3, Funny

    "hoo-(gutteral stop)-SAY"

    It's Klingon for "the editors here can't spell."

    --

    Information wants to be anthropomorphized.

  35. What was so damn good about them? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Are the good times back?"

    There was nothing good about working with or for college dropouts who could barely type, only showing up to the office to say the rode the internet wave.

    The glad these same losers are now selling apartments and cars rather then coattailing of my hard work. The good times were not good, just expensive.

  36. Ask jeeves what he's worth by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ask Jeeves what he's worth and you get this article from 2000.

  37. P/E = 114(!) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    Earnings were _not_ $86M; they were $17.5M, making the P/E ratio a whopping 114, a definite return to the 'bad ole days'. Ask Jeeves has something like 2% of the search market, so I suspect they're hoping blogs are the Next Big Thing and Bloglines will somehow make this deal work in the next five years.

    It won't.

    1. Re:P/E = 114(!) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      maybe they're expecting lonely geeks to pony up at match.com to get a date...

  38. Re: WTF??? I don't know.... by Master_T · · Score: 1

    why don't you Ask Jeeves?

  39. I'd wish them all well but... by Linker3000 · · Score: 1

    Since I got my first 'Ask Jeeves' popunder in Firefox last night they can go boil their heads.

    --
    AT&ROFLMAO
  40. Re: WTF??? I don't know.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I did, but he started jabbering about some Czech government-sponsored agency and El Gordo. Maybe he's trying to tell us something.

  41. Actually... by 4Lancer.net · · Score: 1

    It's being sold for $1.85 billion. Two very different numbers.

    --
    All your searching needs (and free money!) - 4Lancer.net
  42. Wrong in Everything ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    "The majority American debt is owed to other Americans. "

    Wrong :

    http://www.brillig.com/debt_clock/faq.html

    "The national debt you're referring to comes mostly from the US government buying on credit from US corperations. "

    WRONG !

    He is talking about the current federal budget deficit , the Nationnal debt is closer to 7.8 Trillion.

    " this does in many ways repersent a positive injection into our economy because it helps balance the trade deficit. "

    Wrong !

    To balance the trade deficit you would have to sale to other country as much as you buy.And to really balance it you would have to sale more to other in other to pay your huge debts.

    " The reason people won't outsource to here is because even in our current state America repersents a place of inovation and invent simply unmatched in many parts of the world."

    Wrong !

    The reason is higher salary cost , no point in giving 1 dollar for 2 mins of US worker pay when for that amount you can have 30 Chinese or Hindi for 4 hour.

    The Etats-Unians are not innovator the US aint a place of innovation , most innovation come from outside the US.

    " As long as the new technology is here first we shouldn't have a problem. "

    Reality check :

    Nothing as came out of US since the 70's ...

    The world is doing everything in its power to keep your market of extreme spender happy , but there are limits to insanity for the sake of keeping a market alive , With the strong Euro , and soon the Chinese dollars , you will see a shift into global position for dropping your pathetic Country.

    welcome to a new era

  43. But, is Jeeves gay? by PeeAitchPee · · Score: 3, Funny

    . . . get the answer here.

  44. Profitable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Mr. Burns wouldn't buy this company if they weren't profitable. This is from Diller's email we received this morning (I work for an IAC subsidiary): "Ask Jeeves is one of the very few [search engines] that established itself and thrived... in 2004, the company reported pro forma revenue of $314 million, up 63% year-over-year."

  45. This is weird by hqm · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I tried to use Ask Jeeves a couple of times when it came out, and the answers I got to my questions were so bad, so wrong, so utterly useless, it hurt my feelings.

    Try it now, it will take you back to the bad old days before Google, when nothing but random crap shows up. Then try Google, and feel the almost mystical connection from your query to your results.

    It seems to me like it is almost a crime that no one has forcibly made the users of Ask Jeeves sit down and try Google.

  46. Great For Noobs... by theblueprint · · Score: 2, Insightful
    My best friend just bought a PC. He has difficulty with computers in general (we're still working on importing songs to iTunes).

    I continously tell him to "google" something when he has a question, but his seach engine skills need work. Yesterday his female roommate told him to "ask jeeves"...(what is baklava?). For whatever reason, Jeeves worked out for him, and he proceeded to get himself answers to all the questions he's had in a while.

    I think because it encourages the user to literally ask a question, noobs feel more confident that they'll get the results they want. For them,it's easier to ask jeeves "What is baklava?" than to google "baklava definion".

    --
    "from the bricks to the booth...I predict the future like Cleo the psychic..."
    1. Re:Great For Noobs... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't buy it!!!! Type in "what is baklava" into google, and the top line is a "web definition":

      [quote]
      A very sweet dessert made of layers of flaky pastry filled with a mixture of ground nuts (often pistachios) and sugar. The pastry is sliced, baked, and brushed with a honey syrup flavored with lemon or rose water.
      [/quote]

    2. Re:Great For Noobs... by theblueprint · · Score: 1
      I think that we take a lot of things for granted. This is the same guy who texted me four times, claiming that his email was broken. (a space between his moniker and @gmail.com)

      When people go to ask jeeves, they feel like all they need to do is ask a question. (Literally). I think that by telling someone to google something, they think that there's more to it than there is.

      I've demonstrated the awesome power of google to him. For whatever reason, he just doesn't feel confident using it. (hell, he has a hard time finding the intergrated search bar in Firefox).

      The point is, he prefers to ask a seach engine a question in plain english. Google works fine for that, but in his mind, he's "supposed" to ask jeeves in plain english.

      There's examples abound of things that aren't the best, but they "just work" for people. There's no major difference in using Firefox instead of IE, but people still use IE, despite the fact that it's inferior. It works for them.

      --
      "from the bricks to the booth...I predict the future like Cleo the psychic..."
  47. Technology? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Everyone seems focused on "Is askjeeves.com worth $2 billion?"

    You do have to look at this in the broader perspective of IAC's portfolio. They own Citysearch. Expedia. Hotels.com. Priceline. Basically, they own a whole lotta travel and recreation. Which is a search-intensive business--people want to find what they're looking for without wading through stuff they won't. Dropdowns and radio buttons aren't intuitive to everyone, so bringing a more "natural language" search to these products is actually an interesting idea.

    I'd call it a fair bet they're buying Ask Jeeves for the technology (and possibly some level of patent portfolio?), not for the brand.

    Of course, IAC has a history of making aquisitions that seem like interesting opportunities in theory but that they can't execute on in practice (they've done a terrible job integrating their various travel brands).

  48. Bought by the ticketmaster scammers?! by BestNicksRTaken · · Score: 1

    Jees, I don't think being bought by ticketmaster is anything to get excited about!

    And I thought Microsoft owned Expedia?

    Did anyone ever use Jeeves even in it's prime? I always thought it was pretty useless....

    --
    #include <sig.h>
    1. Re:Bought by the ticketmaster scammers?! by Hutchizon · · Score: 1

      MSFT did own Expedia, but it was spun off years ago as EXPE, which was then purchased by IACI a couple of years ago or so. IACI has announced the intention of spinning Expedia (and all their travel properties) into a separate company.

  49. spyware distributers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    yeah no banners, just popups and a fncked computer
    http://www.google.com/search?q=myway+spyware

  50. Not bought, swapped by Animats · · Score: 2, Informative
    It's a stock swap merger, not a cash buy. "Under the terms of Monday's deal, IAC will issue 1.26 shares of its common stock for each share of Ask Jeeves common stock in a tax-free transaction valued at $1.85 billion, discounting any cash involved in the buyout."

    Like most mergers, it will probably be a dud. The performance history of merger and acquisition activity is, overall, negative. But because it increases volatility, it enhances CEO pay.

  51. Which came first: Bloglines or InterActiveCorp? by pmagsa · · Score: 1

    I would like to know whether Ask Jeeves started to talk with InterActiveCorp before of after buying Bloglines.

  52. ASKJ/GRU valuation spread by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    From this link:
    http://answersblogger.blogspot.com/2005/03/ask-jee ves-selling-for-2-billion.html/

    "If you look at this graph comparing traffic trends at askjeeves and answers.com, you might find yourself wondering whether answers.com traffic might soon reach the levels of askjeeves.com traffic. Then you might note that at $20, Gurunet (GRU, owners of anwers.com) has a market cap roughly 1/10 the askjeeves price."

    1. Re:ASKJ/GRU valuation spread by taj123 · · Score: 1

      Oops, that link was broken. This should work: http://answersblogger.blogspot.com/2005/03/ask-jee ves-selling-for-2-billion.html/ "If you look at this graph comparing traffic trends at askjeeves and answers.com, you might find yourself wondering whether answers.com traffic might soon reach the levels of askjeeves.com traffic. Then you might note that at $20, Gurunet (GRU, owners of anwers.com) has a market cap roughly 1/10 the askjeeves price."

    2. Re:ASKJ/GRU valuation spread by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      GuruNet also has revenue that is dwarfed by Jeeves'.

  53. ASKJ/GRU valuation spread (correct link) by taj123 · · Score: 1

    Oops, that link was broken. This should work: http://answersblogger.blogspot.com/2005/03/ask-jee ves-selling-for-2-billion.html "If you look at this graph comparing traffic trends at askjeeves and answers.com, you might find yourself wondering whether answers.com traffic might soon reach the levels of askjeeves.com traffic. Then you might note that at $20, Gurunet (GRU, owners of anwers.com) has a market cap roughly 1/10 the askjeeves price."

  54. 2 Billion!?? by karldavidson · · Score: 1

    man 2 billion for such a worthless site. I would have sold them askkarl.com for a measly 500 Mil

  55. Fools and their money ... by Y2 · · Score: 1

    I have never gotten any useful results form AskJeeves.

    --
    "But all your emitter and collector are belong to me!"
  56. don't forget ServiceMagic.com! by MoNsTeR · · Score: 1

    IAC also owns my employer, ServiceMagic.com

    Try it out next time you need a maid, mover, plumber, electrician, or other home contractor!

    </utterly shameless plug>

  57. Brainboost.com is better for natural-language quer by Jon_Aquino · · Score: 1

    I haven't used it that much, but Brainboost.com seems to be better for natural-language queries. It's being used in a NASA-sponsored project, so it's gotta be pretty good.

  58. Huh? by Stopher2475 · · Score: 0

    2 billion for a second rate search engine? They need to refile this under the I-Smoke-Crack department.

  59. Re: with citysearch, expedia and ticketmaster ... by qubezz · · Score: 1

    Ask Jeeves can now point to InterActive's own properties when it feels like. Let's plan my date, Jeeves:

    Where can I find easy fat chicks (match)

    I need tickets to New Orleans (expedia)

    Where can I get tickets for Hootie? (ticketmaster)

    where are BBQ restarants in New Orleans (citysearch)

    I need a cheap hotel in New orleans(expedia)

    How can I have other people see my searches? (searchspy)

    How can I give all my web browsing information to you for you to resell? (speedbar)

    Their version of the intarweb need not point to pesky competitors.

    Also notable is that all the search return links given by Ask Jeeves are not to the destination site but are referred back to Ask, which then forwards you; AJ know the search returns that you are clicking on also. Couple that with the mandatory cookies on expedia etc and you are being watched, tracked, sold to, and sold.