Slashdot Mirror


Review of the 8 Hour Tablet: Electrovaya Scribbler

Lisa Gade, the chief geek over at MobileTechReview.com, reports that they've just published an in-depth review of the Electrovaya Scribbler SC2200. "It's a Windows XP Tablet Edition with lots of the features you'd expect on a high end slate machine like a 12.1" screen you can write on, a Dothan 1.4GHz processor and WiFi. But its real claim to fame is the huge capacity 10,200 mAh SuperPolymer battery which will get you through a work day without a charge."

46 of 219 comments (clear)

  1. Keyboard by Stigmata669 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    While this looks like a step in the right direction for tablet PCs, the docking style keyboard looks like a recipe for trouble, it looks like it's dangerously easy to break (snapping off because of the upright screen design) or at least damage the contacts from constant plugging and unplugging.

    The burden then relies on XP Tablet edition to get good enough to rarely need a keyboard... something I don't think is likely to happen any time soon. So good in theory, but not quite the magic form needed to bring tablet PCs into the mainstream.

    --
    Yawn.
    1. Re:Keyboard by NanoGator · · Score: 3, Insightful

      "Seems to me it alot adu about nothing. Marketing is getting really slick. They keep selling people the same things, just with new names. Just like the republicans..."

      Uh, okay.

      To answer your question: Tablet PCs are more mobile since they don't require a flat surface to operate on. You can use one standing up, for example. That's definitely a huge plus in my opinion. I can carry my TPC around and use it in a lot more places than I could my old laptop.

      Whether or not you care is entirely up to you, but I wouldn't be so quick to dismiss TPCs as 'the same things with new names'.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
  2. Wait, who cares? by skomes · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Sales of tablet PCs are sliding downwards, let's stop focussing on a hybrid of PDAs and laptops that nobody wants, and focus on getting 2 120 gig hard drives, and x800s in laptops, and getting microdrives and better-than-VGA screens in PDAs and standardize CIR in PDAs. Hybrids share some of the benefits of both technologies, but are really just watered down versions of both. I guess I just don't see the use, I can understand some situations, an engineer or whatever, but how well would autocad or something similar run on this boy anyways?

    1. Re:Wait, who cares? by ivan256 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Check out Averatec. Their convertable notebook/tablet (screen flips to make it a tablet or a notebook) can be had for $799 if you catch a sale at CompUSA. Oh, and they're Athlon XP-M based.

    2. Re:Wait, who cares? by kamileon · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The place where I have seen them be HUGELY popular is with graphic artists. Tablet PCs are the perfect configuration for doodling in Photoshop, doing image editing, etc. But I also have a number of programmer friends who prefer them over using a PDA, despite the extra bulk, because of the ease of jotting down notes quickly, with really good handwriting recognition. Programs like
      One Note just aren't available for the PDA. Which I agree that both PDAs and laptops could be massively improved, there is a niche market for the tablets, and it's enough to encourage hardware companies to keep working on them.

      I have to confess, if they made them as durable as laptops, I'd rather have a tablet than a laptop myself. I don't want a watered down hybrid, I want a full force best of all worlds hybrid, and the tablet has the best potential for that.

      --
      To truly understand recursion, you must first truly understand recursion.
    3. Re:Wait, who cares? by evilviper · · Score: 2, Informative

      Sorry to ruin it for everyone, but I've bought a Laptop from Averatec before, and they are completely crap.

      Their components are just such junk, that you'll be shipping it back to them every couple months until the warranty runs out... at which point you're better off just buying a new one.

      Their service is horrendous (which matters much more when their products need service all the time), and more than once now I had my laptop returned with MORE things wrong with it than I sent it in with.

      If you have any sense at all, stay the hell away from Averatec.

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
  3. What is your definition of a work day? by slagdogg · · Score: 5, Funny

    I haven't had an 8 hour work day since I was a child laborer. Of course, the only people I see using Tablet PCs typically do about 20 minutes of work per day anyways, so this is overkill for them. Good thing Windows Solitaire isn't a big battery hog.

    --
    (Score:-1, Wrong)
  4. Interesting, but I think I'll pass by kennyj449 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I can't help but think that, for that pricing and performance, one would be better off getting a more conventional laptop or tablet and keeping an extra battery or two around. It's nice to see a notebook that actually acts like a portable, but sadly the battery life is about the only thing that this tablet has going for it.

    1. Re:Interesting, but I think I'll pass by NanoGator · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "Who said anything about desktops?"

      Well, I know you didn't pick a laptop over a desktop because it was cheaper and/or faster.

      I'm not trying to arm twist you into wanting a TPC. Just trying to explain that speed's not everything. One of the things I really enjoy about my TabletPC is that I occasionally do sysadmin'ish jobs around the office. The TPC has built in ethernet and 802.11. I can walk around the office and use it without having to clear a spot to set it down. (Especially great when taking inventory.) Twice as many ghz and a bigger screen would not make this job go ANY easier.

      It's all up to your needs, but I think the whole "well it doesn't perform as fast" argument is fairly weak considering this is the site that constantly makes comments about the average Joe not needing more than 300 mhz.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
  5. Tablet PC's? by caryw · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Honestly, am I missing something? I don't mean to troll, but what is the huge advantage of being able to write on a pc screen with crappy recognition software? I don't understand where the market for this kind of device is. I would much rather have a skinny VAIO laptop or a new powerbook. Do that many people need to use a computer standing up? Perhaps it's for taking notes? I still can type much faster than my fastest shorthand scrawl...
    I understand the need for PDA devices where a full sized keyboard isn't practical, but if the device is going to be laptop sized anyway...

    Just wondering.
    --
    Fairfax Underground: Where Fairfax County comes out to play

    1. Re:Tablet PC's? by Rac3r5 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Actually there are a couple of uses. When I was in class in school, taking notes after notes, it would be nice to be able to take these notes down in digital format and not having to carry a big heavy binder. But wait, I can also search through my notes for stuff now. I don't have to worry about pages falling apart or carrying a binder for each class. Suppose im on the skyTrain or bus or sitting on my bead studying, I can go through my notes with relative ease... actually search through the stuff etc.. Thats just one instance. There are so many more... Now I just wish I had a tablet PC when I was in uni... btw,I use handwriting recognition software on my PocketPC and it works just great.

    2. Re:Tablet PC's? by SuperRob · · Score: 5, Informative

      As a college student, I'll tell you that the Tablet PC coupled with Microsoft's OneNote software is a killer app for the Tablet PC. I was able to type notes, draw pictures, record a lecture as an audio clip (annotated with written notes), and grab a couple of web screenshots into a note file for my class, then catalogue and index the notes and make it all searchable. That is incredibly powerful.

      That said, the recognition software is NOT crappy, it's remarkably accurate considering my terrible handwriting, and any mistakes are also easy to fix. This is assuming you have Windows XP SP2, which has updated TIP/Recognition software in it. The initial software wasn't nearly as robust.

    3. Re:Tablet PC's? by Webtommy88 · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I wish i had mod points to mod you up.

      This is especially useful because all my notes come in PDF format so it works incredibly well by opening the pdf in acrobat and editing it straight.

      Also, being a CS/Math major, writting complex equations is alot easier then on a keyboard.

    4. Re:Tablet PC's? by Mumpsman · · Score: 3, Insightful

      There is quite a high demand for these kinds of things in the medical field where physicians do indeed need to use a computer standing up. They need to be able to roam from one exam room to the next without having to drag a cart full of paper medical records. They also tend to work long hours and have low tolerances for having to do un-godlike things like swapping out batteries or returning to a docking station to get a new tablet.

      All of which typically would mean that this might be a welcome advance in the medical field except the software is still all crap...

      --
      No battles to the death are recalled. Mumpsman can hit to attack and cause brainsmashing.
    5. Re:Tablet PC's? by tyman · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The target market for Tablets isn't the average slashdot user. People who would rather have laptops, get laptops. The highest markets are for corporate installs where the workers are on their feet most of their day. For example, in the medical field where nurses need to fill in hundreds of pages of forms a day and have to move from patient to patient. You replace a clipboard with a Tablet and it functions in the same way, but the forms can be easily coordinated with a server so a doctor can access all documents on a patient he needs from his tablet, as soon as it is filled in by the nurse.

    6. Re:Tablet PC's? by Barlo_Mung_42 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Agreed. Once people try them for more then a few minutes at a trade show they see the light.
      The Tablet PC takes mobility to a whole new level in a way that no regular laptop could.
      Even the Mac people I work with are jealous.

    7. Re:Tablet PC's? by larryj · · Score: 2, Interesting

      At least at my office, pecking away at a keyboard during a meeting is a bit rude.

      I sit in meetings and quietly take notes. I have 2 years worth of notes that I can search in seconds. That's my handwriting that I'm searching through too. If I want, I can convert it to text but I've never really found a need to do that. I can also record the audio of the meeting and my notes are highlighted at the appropriate time during playback.

      --
      What if the Hokey-Pokey really is what it's all about?
    8. Re:Tablet PC's? by uhlume · · Score: 2, Funny

      Yeah, the girl does seem pretty extraneous, here...

      --
      SIERRA TANGO FOXTROT UNIFORM
  6. Just how many days? by Nom+du+Keyboard · · Score: 3, Insightful
    10,200 mAh SuperPolymer battery which will get you through a work day without a charge.

    Just how many days will it get you through, before its capacity degrades below 8 hours?

    --
    "It's the height of ridiculousness to say for those 9 lines you get hundreds of millions."
  7. It had to be said... by Matthaeus · · Score: 3, Funny

    Many Dothans died to bring us this processor.

  8. 4.5lbs = 2.0kg by fembots · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It's kind of heavy for a tablet. I'm not sure if battery life is more important than having to hand hold an additional kg.

  9. Mon Mothma Reports by White+Roses · · Score: 4, Funny

    Many Dothans died to bring us this information.

    --
    Do not touch -Willie
  10. I remember seeing an ad for a MS Tablet PC by Pingsmoth · · Score: 2, Insightful

    and it had a guy in the stairwell writing something on his tablet. The tagline of the ad was something like "For those times when inspiration occurs between floors". The gist of it was that with a tablet PC you are not limited to using a PC at your desk, or some other such stationary place.

    What it left me wondering, though, was why not whip out a note pad or sticky note?

    The tablet PC has yet to prove itself as a device that is truly useful and practical--moreso than any notebook computer, that is. It may function just fine, and it may be a fine product, but it still seems to have very little actual purpose.

    --
    http://www.walkingtaco.com
  11. Re:Not bad by BFaucet · · Score: 4, Insightful

    That's a joke, right?

    I highly doubt this tablet was designed with heavy computing in mind. 1.4 GHz Intel chip is more than enough to do word processing, email, watch video, paint, even play many popular games.

    I don't know anyone who would get a tablet for heavy processing.

    --
    -Derick
  12. Re:SuperPolymer? by EverDense · · Score: 2, Funny

    Man, my plastic fuck doll is made of the same thing. And I have never gotten 10 hours from her.

    Sorry to have to break this to you on SlashDot. She definitely lasts 10 hours, its just someone
    else (i.e. the Milkman) is getting a couple of hours of her time every day (if you know what I mean).

    --
    http://jesus.everdense.com/
  13. Dothan @ 1.4 GHz almost == Pentium 4 @ 2.4 GHz by codergeek42 · · Score: 4, Informative

    Because of the way the Dothan (a.k.a. Pentium M) is designed and wired with the rest of the Centrino chipset, it can do more per cycle. In fact, a good rule of thumb for Pentium-M (and Dothans, likewise) is to add one GHz or so and thats the equivalently-rated Pentium 4 speed. There's a good article on Wikipedia with more information: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pentium_M#Dothan

  14. Re:Not bad by lucabrasi999 · · Score: 3, Insightful
    8 Hours is good, but a 1.4Ghz processor.

    Keep using your laptop with a three hour battery. It may take me five more seconds to open up MS Excel each time, but that five seconds will be meaningless when your machine has run out of battery power.

  15. Who Cares? by TimeTraveler1884 · · Score: 2, Funny
    Review of the 8 Hour Tablet
    This is old news. Everyone knows that timed-release capsules are what's hot these days.

  16. Electrovaya... sounds familiar by rsborg · · Score: 2, Interesting
    I looked around a bit, and found . These guys used to sell a battery that I really wanted (claimed 16 hour charge). However, my boss at the time wouldn't shell out. Now a bit later (4 yrs), I realize that it was probably not worth it, since I didn't travel as much.... but it still would have been nice, since
    1. I have cycled through about 6 laptops in the past 4 years and
    2. I still travel once in a while.
    However, I did hear that the charge runs out pretty quickly (i wonder if I'd get as much as 3 hours from that pad these days), and the external batteries can be annoying (warm, and extra gadget to pack).... but some of my coworkers swear by their 2nd or 3rd spare battery for the long haul trip.

    I wonder if buying the external battery might be a better investment than this new tablet?

    --
    Make sure everyone's vote counts: Verified Voting
  17. I didn't see any mention of heat... by PornMaster · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Given that a tablet is probably meant to be written on while held in one arm... are there hotspots on these things that slowly cook your arm?

    1. Re:I didn't see any mention of heat... by sholden · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You must have missed this part:

      "When unplugged, the unit stays surprisingly cool and won't toast your arm."

  18. Re:Not bad by OldeTimeGeek · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Then you probably wouldn't be using a Tablet PC, would you?

    You look at your needs and you takes your choices. I have a 1.1Ghz Compaq/HP TC 1100 and for most tasks (even including, surprisingly enough, Photoshop), it works quite well.

  19. Bluetooth? by voidware · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Yeah, but there's no bluetooth. Isn't the point of these things to give me more freedom? Well, I hate wires.

  20. Re:Not bad by lucabrasi999 · · Score: 2, Interesting
    One of our companies' apps takes a half hour or so to compile on my 2.4ghz P4M laptop, that's an long, awkward, span of time to sit there drumming your fingers in front of a client.

    Since most corporate desktops are rarely 3.2GHz gaming machines with 1 Gig of RAM (in fact, most of the corporate desktops I use are barely more powerful than your laptop), I would first guess that you are running on a wireless network or cable modem. A cable modem is not a T1 line, after all. And, since it is not a T1 line, it takes much longer to compile.

  21. I agree by InfiniteWisdom · · Score: 5, Funny

    I totally agree with you... after all this is clearly targetted at real-time 3D modelling (what else would you use a portable battery-operated device for?), so we do need something with quad 3.7GHz Xeons.

  22. Li-ion vs Li-poly by adralien · · Score: 4, Informative

    Lithium ion is far superior to Li-polymer, Electrovaya's polymer is well known for only getting 200-300 cycles, only a year of use for business... Li-ion typically gets 500 to 1000 cycles with a nicer fade over the life cycle.

  23. Toshiba M200 by freitasm · · Score: 4, Informative

    I vote for the Toshiba Portege M200 though. Much higher resolution (12.1" XVGA+ 1400x1050 pixels), faster Centrino (1.5GHz on mine, 1.6GHz on newer versions), SD card reader, PC Card slot, USB 2.0. And a very cool built-in accelerometer that is underused, but there's a demo application available called WinGimcana.

  24. We had some Scribblers by DarthZen · · Score: 3, Informative

    The battery life we got with Scribblers was closer to about 6 hours than eight, but it's still pretty good.

    The irritating thing about them is that you have to manually turn the wireless connection on every time you boot the tablet. You can't make it automatic. Very irritating.

    In addition, we did a review on one model scribbler, which met our needs (2050, I believe). By the time we got around to ordering them, they had discontinued that model and gave us newer ones (2150, I believe) Every single one of the newer ones has had major issues remaining connected to the wireless network. They are constantly dropping packets. It's possible they fixed this in the 2250, but I'd be careful before buying one.

  25. Ah, you ever hear of PEN COMPUTING? by Infinite+Entropy · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Judgeing by your comment I wonder if you realize that Tablet PCs are fundamentally pen-based computers. And the pen functionality is VERY slick indeed. I have a Toshiba M200 and its I never get tired of whipping it out in class and using it to take notes. Its really helped my to improve my note taking.

    1. Re:Ah, you ever hear of PEN COMPUTING? by chaoaretasty · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Completely agreed. My handwriting has always been messy, very messy, and not amazingly quick either. But I can type at 60 WPM, more than enough to keep up with my lecturers and be able to concentrate on what they mean rather than just what they say. Being on a physics course thoguh means lots and lots of diagrams making the pen invaluable.

  26. Re:I like the wacom tablets better. by pkhuong · · Score: 2, Informative

    Aahh, disinformation. Guess who makes just about every tablet's (except the, iirc, HPaq TC-1k) digitiser? Wacom.

    --
    Try Corewar @ www.koth.org - rec.games.corewar
  27. Re:I wonder by mobilebuddha · · Score: 2, Insightful

    yup, i am gonna spend 2000 dollars on a 12.1 inch TOUCHSCREEN so i can run LINUX IN TEXT MODE.

  28. Re:Not bad by lucabrasi999 · · Score: 2, Informative
    I do not think that word "compile" means what you think it means.

    Maybe. Maybe not. I think it means option 3 on this link. The Poster was complaining about the amount of time it took to "compile". I was pointing out that there are multiple reasons why it takes apps a long time to compile, not just chip speed.

  29. Why can't I get this in something simple? by interstellar_donkey · · Score: 2

    The eight hour battery life sounds impressive. But what I want to know is, why can't we get that kind of long lasting power out of boring old regular laptops? I don't need exotic features, but it seems that every time I go shopping for a working laptop power is at the bottom of the list, but there are tons of impressive power hogging features that are bundled with the product that I usually don't want or need.

    When I'm on the road, typically the only thing I need a laptop for is MS office (writing documents, working with spreadsheets), and occasionally working with some other third party apps like Primavera's Suretrak (which, incidentally, I hate).

    I can think of a number power hungry features that I don't want or need, that takes away my battery life:

    High-power graphics: I don't play 3d games on the laptop. I have a desktop at home for playing games, and if I'm bored on the road, my phone has enough entertainment titles installed on it to placate me. I don't do professional quality graphic arts work on the laptop. In reality, a 800x600 screen with 16 bit color would be aptly handle my work. So a power hungry graphics accelerator isn't needed, or any advanced graphics features. Also, I often find myself in well lit areas, and it would be nice to be able to easily turn off the backlight on the LCD display to save on juice, but I've yet to see that implemented.

    CPU hogging apps: Why is it every time I unpack a laptop, there seem to be dozens of background applications pre-installed? I don't need them, and I don't want them, and I always end up having to spend lots of time uninstalling them. I get this with desktops, too. Windows appears to love including all sorts of unnecessary bloat which gobbles up CPU cycles. If there was some way to get rid of all this crud, I could easily get by with slower (and less power hungry) CPU. I don't follow mobile technology closely, but if I remember the whole hub-bub surrounding Transmeta's Crusoe chip (other then Torvald's name being attached) was that it could husband the cpu's power requirements based on needs of the OS. Something like that would work great for me, since most of the time I'm just typing into a MS Word document which shouldn't require that much in terms of CPU cycles.

    Sound: Does anyone really need stereo sound on a laptop? I hardly need sound to begin with, and I certainly don't need to be driving two speakers on my laptop. I'm somewhat of an audiophile, and I like good sound from my home stereo and portable music devices. But from my laptop computer it's more or less wasted. Granted, I can always (and usually do) mute the sound on my laptop to save energy, but it seems that a lot of power is being driven towards something that really only serves the purpose of giving warning bells and beeps. Sure, some people like to use their laptops as portable DVD players while on flights, but for me that's really not a necessity.

    Peripherals: I've never used or needed the CD-Rom burner on my laptops. Lately when I need to quickly transfer data from one machine to another, I'll use a USB thumb drive (a technology which I've learned to love!) In fact, I've never used any removable storage drives on my computer while mobile. Yet when I turn the laptop on, I can hear the drives spinning up, sucking power away. On my old laptop I had a secondary battery I could put in the slot where the CD-Rom goes, but I still had to carry around the drive in my laptop bag. That's not to say that I'd never need a CD-Rom drive, but it would be nice if I could easily just turn it off (as opposed to yanking it out of the laptop).

    Networking: Wifi is great. There are times when I can and do use wired or wireless networking when the laptop isn't plugged in. But I don't see why the integrated 802.11x device in my laptop needs to be on and taking up power while I'm in flight, or when I'm on the side of the road just trying to finish up a report. From what I understand, the wifi device is always running in the back

    --
    The Internet is generally stupid
  30. Re:Not bad by IAMTHEMEDIA · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Unless your just planning on using spreadsheet and word I would see most sales in the near future going toward those who want the entire multimedia deal, I would use it as my computer of choice given the oppertunity to trick it out, and of course, run Suse 9.1. New battery technology will help make more then just this lameass product run for long periods, it will help fuel the convergence so I can make a call, organize my stocks and play Doom 3 while riding the A train at the same time. Good deal on the battery but the product its self just issint impressive enough to buy.