Slashdot Mirror


French Response to Google is Microsoft

efp writes "Mark Liberman posted over in the Language Log that, in considering alternatives to Google's library initiative in Europe, French President Jacques Chirac would consider a partnership with Microsoft 'since he has so many views in common with its president, Bill Gates'. This comes out of talks between the French president, the head of the French National Library and the Minister of Culture, in in part 'building an alter ego to the American project, before thinking of an eventual collaboration with Google, so as not to negotiate from a position of weakness' as they plan to digitize their cultural resources."

47 of 530 comments (clear)

  1. Pssst Jacques by Space+cowboy · · Score: 3, Funny

    Just see the sig.

    --
    Physicists get Hadrons!
  2. France surrendering? by BaronSprite · · Score: 3, Funny

    Karma be damned. France surrendering to what appears to be a superior power? Where have I seen this before...

    1. Re:France surrendering? by anno1a · · Score: 4, Insightful

      If memory serves right they didn't surrender the last time when a superior power tried to convince them to help invade Iraq illegally.

      --
      ------- I fumbled my registration and I now must suffer
    2. Re:France surrendering? by Clay+Pigeon+-TPF-VS- · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Heh. France screwed itself over by not being able to cope with blitz tactics, and relying on a fortified line which was bypassed by going through Benelux (remind anyone of WW1?)

      France had abyssimal air power compared to the Germans. They could have killed Nazi Germany while it was in the early stages of re arming, but they chose not to. They paid the price for forcing the treaty of Versailles on Germany, with all its reperations, which kept the Democratic Wiemar Republic (sp?) so weak that it was easily overtaken by the National Socialists.

      The League of Nations was a joke. It was even more impotent than the present UN. Having the US in it would not have changed that.

      --
      Viral software licensing is not freedom, it is in fact GNU/Socialism.
  3. Yup, lots of similarities by Godman · · Score: 5, Funny

    They are both filthy stinkin rich, hate google, and dream of a new world order?

    --
    I have this really funny quote that I like to put here. Unfortunately, there's this really annoying thing called a char
    1. Re:Yup, lots of similarities by Guylhem · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Oh my god. At this very moment I'm so ashamed of being french. Could someone please pass the cluestick to Chirac?

      It's not because he don't like what's being done by google/gutemberg/whatever that he should pledge alliance to the evil empire. What's the point of going with Microsoft?

      Forget negociations! This is *wrong*, period. Nothing can justify it.

      What's next? An alliance with McDonalds if Jojo decides to open restaurants in France ?

    2. Re:Yup, lots of similarities by Guppy06 · · Score: 4, Funny

      "Could someone please pass the cluestick to Chirac?"

      Quick! What's a clue-by-four in SI?

    3. Re:Yup, lots of similarities by PopCulture · · Score: 3, Interesting

      maybe if the US gov't hadn't completely bailed out of the anti-trust case, microsoft- a company that makes operating systems, office productivity tools, databases and development platforms- wouldn't be the only obvious choice to oppose google (who has been less than receptive to this particular customer's wishes, as documented on slashdot many times before...

      basically there's enough blame to go around I guess.

      --

      Here's to finally giving Bush his exit strategy in November
    4. Re:Yup, lots of similarities by Idarubicin · · Score: 4, Informative
      Quick! What's a clue-by-four in SI?

      That would be a ken-by-ten .

      --
      ~Idarubicin
    5. Re:Yup, lots of similarities by jdgeorge · · Score: 5, Insightful

      They are both filthy stinkin rich, hate google, and dream of a new world order?

      On one hand, the first item in that list is a documented fact. On the other hand, the comment is, as a whole, a troll. Curiously, most of the posts that follow are even less interested in the facts.

      It is interesting how unapologetically ignorant so many my fellow US citizens are willing to be when they:

      1. Didn't realize that the Slashdot summary misrepresented the nature of Chirac's comment, because they
      2. Obviously didn't read the linked article, and
      3. Have the opportunity to hurl invective at the most popular target of insecure American white trash.

      American journalism, thy name is Slashdot.

  4. Oh well by The-Bus · · Score: 4, Funny

    If it's anything like my Outlook PST file, it will be able to hold about 1000 documents, then not work as well.

    Sounds fun!

    --

    Small potatoes make the steak look bigger.

  5. So does Google then become... by tquinlan · · Score: 4, Funny

    ...a "freedom engine"? ;)

    --
    DBA? Software Engineer? My company is hiring! Click
  6. What I see by bogaboga · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I see some kind of retaliation or what I'd call divide & rule, by the French government. "If you do not cooperate, (read `pay for content') I will go to your rival(s)." M$ used this against IBM on a limited level in the 80s and they succeeded to some extent.

    1. Re:What I see by Earered · · Score: 5, Informative

      Because France (and the rest of Europe) is in a position of weakness when it comes to ebook.

      The BNF http://www.bnf.fr/ has attempted too early to scan lots of books, without the right plan.

      The result? a bunch of low res image in locked PDF (can't select and copy) of some two hundred years books.

      What google has done, is making a few people think in France: hey! We have completly fucked up our electronic library!
      Given that it has costed several millions to citizen without any results,
      maybe we should try to not suck so that the docile citizen do not notice the millions of euros which have been stupidly spent for a totaly useless project!

  7. This thread is a placeholder by alphakappa · · Score: 5, Funny

    for all the French+Bill Gates jokes

    --
    "When the only tool you own is a hammer, every problem begins to resemble a nail." - Abraham Maslow (1908-1970)
  8. Alright, this is getting downright bizarre by ZackSchil · · Score: 3, Funny

    I have nothing against the French but what's next? France decides SCO's case has merit, claims jurisdiction? I'm just confused. It just seems odd that the country that takes issue with Google's helpful, automated services because they occasionally violate copyright is considering working with Microsoft, the king of anti-trust! No wonder the French people are so jaded.

  9. "not to negotiate from a position of weakness" by Qzukk · · Score: 3, Insightful

    When negotiating with Microsoft, is there anyone who can NOT negotiate from a position of weakness?

    --
    If I have been able to see further than others, it is because I bought a pair of binoculars.
    1. Re:"not to negotiate from a position of weakness" by ettlz · · Score: 3, Funny

      The electricity company.

  10. Proprietary Formats by doktor-hladnjak · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Perhaps the saddest part about France going to Microsoft for this project is that whatever data is produced is more likely to be locked into some proprietary format. That could be particularly unfortunate, since these cultural resources really belong to all the people of France and should therefore be made as accessible as possible.

    1. Re:Proprietary Formats by ArsSineArtificio · · Score: 3, Funny

      Perhaps the saddest part about France going to Microsoft for this project is that whatever data is produced is more likely to be locked into some proprietary format.

      That's a needlessly harsh way to refer to the French language. The proper term is "an obsolete format".

      --
      All employees must wash hands before seeking equitable relief.
    2. Re:Proprietary Formats by ArsenneLupin · · Score: 3, Insightful
      That could be particularly unfortunate, since these cultural resources really belong to all the people of France

      ... and beyond! French is not only spoken in France, but also in Canada, large parts of Africa, Belgium, and lots of other places as well.

      Shouldn't these other countries also have a say about what happens to the French culture?

  11. Rooting for the Underdog by osewa77 · · Score: 4, Funny

    It is a well known fact that European governments prefer to support the under-dog: "Go Bill, go Bill, go!"

  12. Great.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    Now the French can leverage the power of DRM to keep their military failures in the last century a secret!

  13. Well,,, by mbrewthx · · Score: 5, Funny

    Moi, j'aime bien nos maitres francais des biblioteque borg.

    --
    __________ Leave me alone I'm compiling a RPG II program on my S/36...Thanks to metamucil I'm a Regular Meta Moderator
    1. Re:Well,,, by MORB · · Score: 3, Informative

      Nice try :p

      "Pour ma part, je souhaite la bienvenue à nos nouveaux maîtres français des bibliothèques borg."

  14. French? by untouchable · · Score: 3, Insightful

    What's wrong with the french?

    French good deeds this year: 2
    French bad deeds this year: 5
    Le sigh . . . .
    --
    As Seen On TV's? Come back!!!
  15. Oooh La La by the+eric+conspiracy · · Score: 3, Funny

    So Microsoft has just bought France to go along with their acquisition of evil?
    Sounds like a matched set to me.

  16. Re:Do you Americans know... by flabbergast · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Come on! We're Americans! Do you think we *care* what everyone else thinks?

    All joking aside, regardless of my feelings towards the French, which are pretty close to neutral, this does seem contrary to their nationlistic zeal to keep France French. I (like other posters) assumed that the government would come up with its own solution. It seems absurd that France would team up with that oh so American company Microsoft to thwart that other oh so American company Google.

    P.S. The US was attacked by terrorists because of numerous things, but name calling is not one of them.
    P.P.S. The rest of the world bashes the US. Don't you think we get tired of that?

  17. Read the actual article before you comment!!! by jp8000 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Does someone realize that Chirac never actually talked about partnering with Microsoft??? Not even close?
    This post relates to ANOTHER post which translates ANOTHER article in a French newspaper which says that some UNNAMED assistant to Chirac when asked about the possibility of partnering with Microsoft answered "why not?" (which does not seem like a terrible answer..., there is no reason to dismiss anybody before the project is launched...).

    1. Re:Read the actual article before you comment!!! by Tonytheloony · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Yes, you are of course correct. But any article with the word french in it leads to the ultimate troll unfortunately.
      Most people don't care for fact, they prefer canned explanations for what is happening.

      --
      The quickest way to become an atheist is to study the Bible thoroughly.
  18. Re:now there's one more reason to hate france by rokzy · · Score: 3, Insightful

    > if it wasn't their support of terrorists, their ingratiating manner about our saving their asses twice, and the fact that they are as useless as tits on a nun, now i have another reason.

    in the words of Simon Pegg:

    what a prick.

  19. He, you Anglosaxons might have a point :-) by BerntB · · Score: 3, Insightful
    Being Swedish, I've always thought it was quite strange, this attitude from US and English towards the French.

    I've never met anyone from France that was rude and refused to try to speak English -- quite the opposite.

    I've heard it argued that Americans go to Paris to "see France" -- and their opinions about the French is more or less similar to the common French opinion about people living in Paris... :-)

    It has been a bit frustrating, when the "frogs" don't live up to the image I get from being steeped in the literature of English speaking (or mangling) cultures.

    But I'll have to change opinion now. :-(

    It do give a bit of perspective at the local politicians. There are worse examples.

    --
    Karma: Excellent (My Karma? I wish...:-( )
    1. Re:He, you Anglosaxons might have a point :-) by Seumas · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I have always had the impression that, when in France, French people are typically rude and snotty toward Americans.

      However, all of the French people I've dealt with at work and otherwise (in person) have been extremely nice people. Then again, I've never found any group of people from any place in the world that, in general, struck me as stupid, stubborn, snobbish or anything else. There may have been an individual or two that did - but no more so than any general population.

      I think most people adhere to this stereotype of French people simply because it's what they hear on Fox News, talk radio and other random people - with no experience of their own.

      I would probably feel uncomfortable and out of place in France - but I have no doubt that I'd find the people themselves easy to deal with - just as I've found them easy to deal with when they visit my country.

    2. Re:He, you Anglosaxons might have a point :-) by Ohreally_factor · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Actually, I think the anti-French thing in the US comes mostly from the second half of the last century, mostly because of Charles de Gaulle (although Churchill, Roosevelt and Ike certainly had problems with him during WW2, but that stuff didn't come to light until later).

      Chirac to my (typically uninformed American) eye seems to be in the mold of de Gaulle, and I'd guess that part of his popularity is from him "standing up" to the US.

      England, otoh, does have a looooong history of conflict with France. The English version of the finger is two fingers held defiantly (with the palm inwards, as opposed to peace or victory, where the palm is outward), from the days when the French would cut off the fingers of any English longbow troops they captured.

      --
      It's not offtopic, dumbass. It's orthogonal.
    3. Re:He, you Anglosaxons might have a point :-) by coopseruantalon · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Chirac is not that popular. The only reason he is still president is to avoid corruption charges. Besides the people of France had him and Le Penn to choose from. Talk about the lesser of two evils. "Le Raciste ou la criminelle" Excuse my French :-) I can understand why Chirac says he thinks they have a lot in common, they are both criminals...

    4. Re:He, you Anglosaxons might have a point :-) by dartmongrel · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Well the situation isn't improving in Canada, either. All kinds of fun new laws are happening here!:)
      I think that what we're seing is the gradual degradation of civilization; we are approaching a time of great change, the ultimate domination of humanity by a brainless corporate-style world governement. Business interests feed the channels of power (through money) in the world now. The gradual "dumbing down" of the mob/populace ensure the continuation of an upward feeding, parasitic capitalism.
      My vote's with the REVOLUTION!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    5. Re:He, you Anglosaxons might have a point :-) by Wiwi+Jumbo · · Score: 3, Informative

      I've come to know of it as the French of Paris are rude and snotty to everyone.

      2 first hand accounts, and 1 second hand.

      I know a French-Canadian girl who just *hates* the people of Paris. She just can't believe how people will talk to her when they hear her accent.

      I know a woman at work who is *from* France, but not Paris, and will tell you that Paris earns it's reputation when it comes to the "rude Frenchman".

      Also at work I've heard a few stories of French-Canadians going to see the "homeland" and are just left dissappointed with the reception they recieve.....

      Two years ago I spent 2 weeks in Paris and although I don't speak French (You should have seen me trying to get McDonald's to go... "Umm....'dans le sac'????") I never really had any trouble... tho I did find the younger people to be more willing (or maybe they just knew more English) to help me.

      --
      Wiwi
      "I trust in my abilities,
      but I want more then they offer"
    6. Re:He, you Anglosaxons might have a point :-) by swillden · · Score: 4, Insightful

      But when Americans are arrogant, it's excusable--they're from the most powerful country in the world. France, on the other hand; what has France contributed to the world that makes them so special?

      They were the most important country in the western world, for a good long time. They may not always have been the most powerful, but they were the cultural center of Europe. Even when the sun never set on the British Empire, cultured Britons studied French, sat on French furniture, drank French wine and generally revered all things French (except perhaps the French themselves).

      That sense of cultural superiority dies hard, probably because it is so comfortable to think of yourself as coming from a superior people. At least a part of current middle-eastern frustration arises from the fact that people there are accustomed to thinking of themselves as a powerful, influential culture -- which they were when the Europeans were arguably near savages. Chinese also have a long-standing sense of superiority, derived from thousands of years of civilization, that often puts them subtly (or not so subtly) at odds with the current young upstart superpower. Greeks tend to have a high opinion of the relative value of their culture based on the heights they reached 2-3000 years ago. I haven't really noticed the same effect among Italians; maybe they don't really think of themselves as the same people as the Romans? They're quite proud of their history, granted, but don't seem to draw any personal superiority from it. Maybe I just haven't met the right Italians :-)

      For that matter, I think that if we Americans honestly analyze our own position in the world, we have to conclude that we're in decline now, and not in as powerful a position as we pretend to be (though we're clearly in a pre-eminent position). It's just so nice to think of yourself as superior that in spite of both the silliness of the notion and the fact that it may not be true, people hold onto it.

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
  20. Re:now there's one more reason to hate france by WIAKywbfatw · · Score: 4, Insightful

    No wonder most Americans have such a distorted view of world history if this is how an American high school history teacher thinks.

    Seriously, in that one sentence you've demonstrated that you're so clueless about history that you're a danger in the classroom. I have to agree with the other poster that I'd be very worried if you were teaching my kids.

    --

    "Accept that some days you are the pigeon, and some days you are the statue." - David Brent, Wernham Hogg
  21. NO as said general Patton (or was it YES ?) by Coeurderoy · · Score: 5, Informative

    What happened up to now is that: The president of France said that he'd rather have his own "very large digital library" rather than let google do it all on their own. What some of his "minder" said in answer of a journalists question was: yes Microsoft could be a partner. Most probably if the journalist would have asked if Oracle, or Mysql or any other organisation/person/BEM the answer would have been more or less the same.

    The first issue being: Should the governement fund a public "digital library" The second issue being: How.

    So I do find it very unfortunate that people make a lot of "advertizement" for a mediocre propriaitary software provider (as in you can write good things or bad things about me, but first of all write about me !), based on partial information.

    For the record, I do like the google search engine, but I do think that any government should make the effort of putting as much as possible of cultural content as possible online.

    Of course I do hope that when the project will start it will use Free and Open Source Software, but for the time being there is not even a call for tender

    BTW the french national library is called "La tres grande bibliotheque"/"Bibliotheque François Mitterand", (socialist predecessor of Chirac) no wonder Jacques wants his own.

    For those actually interested in what is there http://gallica.bnf.fr/

  22. Re:Dying super powers of the world unite! by organum · · Score: 3, Interesting

    This is interesting because politically the U.S. is so much like Microsoft - a lumbering dinosaur of stasis that won't engage an evolving world. Instead, it looks to impose it's will by brute force and deceitful stratagems.

    From my travels in France, I've found the people to be as forward-thinking (and well-informed) politically as they are conformist and sycophantic technologically. Chirac's cluelessness doesn't suprise me in this regard.

    The French government has a reputation for opportunism when it come to matters such as peddling arms to all comers, but, at the same time, it's a government much more likely to be reigned in by an engaged populus -- as opposed to the U.S. where folks rely on pseudo news organizations such as Fox News.

    It's strange how France's romance for American culture has been contorted into a self-abasing worship of one America's largest coporate leech.

  23. Re:Fuck you, France... by Zakabog · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Posting as AC to preserve my karma from the hordes of French pussies who'd rather mod me down than step up and fight...

    So basically what you're saying is you're too much of a pussy to risk your karma because you're afraid someone might mod you down in disagreement?

    "Run to Bill, he'll protect us!" Now there's an idea. Jeeze, France, explain to us how your country has actually been relevant for 30 years...

    They're not running to Bill, when asked if they'd select Google's competitor, Microsoft, the president's advisor said "Why not?" Not "Yeah, we've already signed a contract", just "Why not?" if any other company was mentioned it would have had the same response.

  24. Where there's smoke there's fire by SuperKendall · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The thing is that places do acquire reputations for a reason.

    I'm not saying everyone in France is rude, I'm saying that on average in France you are going to find more people who are seemingly rude (seemingly is key, more in a second) to you than perhaps if you travelled elsewhere.

    I have a few friends who have travelled to France (including outlying regions beyond paris) and the only one who enjoyed the experience is someone whose wife spoke fluent French.

    This effect is aggravated by the "seemingly rude" point - there are some things people do in other cultures that strike Americans as rude. Part of that for my friends was some sort of service issue at restaurants, I forget the detail but some seemingly inconsequential thing they wanted was looked on in outrage by the waiter. Perhaps he also viewed the request as rude, but the response basically discolored my friends opinion of restaurants in France.

    My own example along those lines is from a trip to Barcelona - myself and a few friends (two of which spoke Spanish pretty well) went into a toy store to browse. Now there was this cool thing in the window that I wanted to buy, so I took it from the display to take up to the cash register -well let me tell you the owner of the store flipped out! He was yelling and cursing at me like I had just set fire to his dog. Even after we explained calmly that I had not meant to offend he was incredibly angry and demanded we leave the store that instant! Well no toy is worth an altercation but to this day none of us can figure out what set him off to that degree. While it did not make me think of all Spaniards as lunatics, it certainly made me think a little bit inside that shopkeepers there were on something of a power trip with little respect for customers.

    So reputations of other countries being difficult may stem from the degree of cultural differences between two countries. And to some extent, I have to say that given that the reputation is correct as far as the average person goes. Even though the behavior there might not really be rude, to the traveller it might seem that way and really that's the same thing as far as the traveller is concerned!

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:Where there's smoke there's fire by Lauwenmark · · Score: 4, Insightful


      The thing is that places do acquire reputations for a reason.


      The problem is that too often, the reputation is founded on false rumors and very limited experience. That's what - both in French and English - leads to Clichés: caricatural descriptions.


      I have a few friends who have travelled to France (including outlying regions beyond paris) and the only one who enjoyed the experience is someone whose wife spoke fluent French.


      First, it is harder to enjoy a trip in a foreign country when you don't speak its language. It may sound weird to you, but the vast majority of humans do not speak or even understand English. The French popular culture relies heavily on spoken language, so it is hard to enjoy it if you don't understand it.

      Moreover, there has been a strong Anti-Americanism sentiment in France (and more generally in Western Europe) since the start of the war in Iraq, mirroring the Anti-French sentiment in the US. It could have played a role in the bad experience as well.

      Finally, even French citizens recognize that some Parisians are maybe a little too proud of themselves - but that's not a problem specific to Paris or France and certainly cannot be generalized to all the Frenchs.


      This effect is aggravated by the "seemingly rude" point - there are some things people do in other cultures that strike Americans as rude. Part of that for my friends was some sort of service issue at restaurants, I forget the detail but some seemingly inconsequential thing they wanted was looked on in outrage by the waiter. Perhaps he also viewed the request as rude, but the response basically discolored my friends opinion of restaurants in France.


      When travelling to a foreign country, you have to accept its customs and habits. If you step on them, you'll definitely turn people angry or annoyed. If you make a mistake and offend somebody, apologizing solves it in most cases. Unfortunately, I have to admit that I didn't see a lot of american tourists caring much about the local behavior in restaurants, hotels or museums.


      (...)
      While it did not make me think of all Spaniards as lunatics, it certainly made me think a little bit inside that shopkeepers there were on something of a power trip with little respect for customers.


      Never *ever* touch the window display in a shop in Western Europe. That's a *major* mistake. For the shop keeper, it is about as offensive as taking a item exposed in a museum "to better see it" or to touch a XIVth century painting with your fingers "to check what kind of pigment it is". For him, that would be about the same if you threw a stone on his shop's display window.

      Your experience is definitely one of "cultural gap", not a "those people are unfriendly" one. Don't expect the shop keeper to have any respect for a customer who obviously had none for him !


      So reputations of other countries being difficult may stem from the degree of cultural differences between two countries. And to some extent, I have to say that given that the reputation is correct as far as the average person goes. Even though the behavior there might not really be rude, to the traveller it might seem that way and really that's the same thing as far as the traveller is concerned!


      I definitely disagree with your conclusion. *Everybody* in *every* foreign culture will be annoyed, offended or angry when you stomp on their customs. The vast majority of people (at least in Spain and France, which I know pretty well) are very friendly and will be open and helpful - as long as you don't behave as some kind of barbarian from their point of view.

      Before taking conclusions about the friendliness in foreign countries, always think about your own behavior first: did the inhabitants find it offensive ? Did you ask them first when you were uncertain on what was the proper thing to do ? Did you present apologises in the formal way used by the inhabitants ? In most cases, you'll find it very instructive and it will help you to enjoy your future trips much more than any "Those guys are unfriendly" kind of Cliché.

  25. Re:Here is an absolutely fantasic fact. Must read. by Ohreally_factor · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Yes, I know about Vichy France, which the U.S. originally recognized before we joined the hostilities. At that point we supported de Gaulle and the Free French, but never whole heartedly, because de Gaulle was such a pain in the ass (from the Anglo-American perspective).

    You might note that the Free French 19th Corps participated in Operation Torch. And it's been said that the fight was easier because many Vichy soldiers went over to the Free French side, rather than fight the Allies.

    Still, one of the funnier Churchill quotes is, "The heaviest cross I had to bear during the war was the Cross of Lorraine." The Cross of Lorraine was the symbol of Free France, and de Gaulle was Free France.

    --
    It's not offtopic, dumbass. It's orthogonal.
  26. Translation Error by Lauwenmark · · Score: 5, Informative

    The translation isn't correct for the first paragraph. That's quite a problem, since it changes the meaning significantly.

    Le président serait-il prêt à s'entretenir avec le concurrent de Google, Microsoft, puisqu'il a tant de convergences de vues avec son président, Bill Gates, qu'il a longuement reçu à l'Elysée? "Pourquoi pas?", répondent les conseillers de M. Chirac.

    The initial translator wrote "Would the president be ready to make a deal with Google's competitor, Microsoft" which is incorrect.

    A correct translation would be:

    Would the president be ready to talk with Google's competitor, Microsoft, since he has so many views in common with its president, Bill Gates, whom he has long welcomed to the Elysée?

    Quite a different meaning, don't you think ?

  27. Slashdot FUD by totatis · · Score: 4, Informative

    As usual, the Slashdot headline is pure FUD.

    Here is the snippet from Le Monde's article : Dans l'esprit du chef de l'Etat, il s'agit de bâtir un "alter ego" au projet américain, avant d'envisager une éventuelle collaboration avec Google, pour ne pas discuter en situation de faiblesse. Le président serait-il prêt à s'entretenir avec le concurrent de Google, Microsoft, puisqu'il a tant de convergences de vues avec son président, Bill Gates, qu'il a longuement reçu à l'Elysée ? "Pourquoi pas ?", répondent les conseillers de M. Chirac.

    Translation : "In Chirac's mind, the idea is to build an "alter-ego" to the American project, before thinking about a collaboration with Google, to have a good position in negociations. Would the president be ready to talk with Microsoft, since he has many common ideas with Bill Gates, whom he has met at the Elysée ? "Why not ?" is the answer from Chirac's advisors."

    In summary, Chirac wants to build a French language online library, to have a good collaborative work with google. Should that work be done with Microsoft ? Maybe yes, maybe not. But the stated goal is to work with google, whatever that goal that can be achieved with Microsoft or not.

    If you need to work with Oracle, what do you do ? You call an MS sales man to leverage your negociations with Oracle. Well, France wants to work with Google, so it doesn't forbid itself from working with Microsoft, if that gives it a better negociations position.

    Slashdot has become more and more a FUD machine, with more or less every headline in contradiction with linked article. Worse, since the actual content of the article is from Le Monde, and is in French, many non-French speaking readers won't be able to see the utter non-sense that the Slashdot article is. This is more and more becoming the Fox News for Nerds, and it's starting to seriously upset me.