Slashdot Mirror


French Response to Google is Microsoft

efp writes "Mark Liberman posted over in the Language Log that, in considering alternatives to Google's library initiative in Europe, French President Jacques Chirac would consider a partnership with Microsoft 'since he has so many views in common with its president, Bill Gates'. This comes out of talks between the French president, the head of the French National Library and the Minister of Culture, in in part 'building an alter ego to the American project, before thinking of an eventual collaboration with Google, so as not to negotiate from a position of weakness' as they plan to digitize their cultural resources."

289 of 530 comments (clear)

  1. Pssst Jacques by Space+cowboy · · Score: 3, Funny

    Just see the sig.

    --
    Physicists get Hadrons!
    1. Re:Pssst Jacques by mOoZik · · Score: 2, Funny

      Wow, you're just so...wow, your wisdom has taken my breath away. I was going to comment, but with a sig like that, just wow.

    2. Re:Pssst Jacques by aardvarkjoe · · Score: 1

      The "legitimate comments in multiple places in the same discussion" is a "for instance." It doesn't say that the comments must be in the same thread or discussion in order to be redundant; that's just an example.

      --

      How can we continue to believe in a just universe and freedom to eat crackers if we have no ale?
    3. Re:Pssst Jacques by Pluvius · · Score: 1

      There's nothing in that first sentence that suggests that those places given are only examples. The second sentence is an example, but of redundancy in one of the places given in the first sentence.

      BTW, hopefully that oh-so-clever moderator is gone, otherwise we're both going to be modded down.

      Rob

  2. France surrendering? by BaronSprite · · Score: 3, Funny

    Karma be damned. France surrendering to what appears to be a superior power? Where have I seen this before...

    1. Re:France surrendering? by ari_j · · Score: 2, Funny

      If their battle flag wasn't a white sheet, they might not surrender as often.

    2. Re:France surrendering? by killawatt5k · · Score: 1

      Where have I seen this before... hmmm. Mabee here http://fark.com/

    3. Re:France surrendering? by Hachey · · Score: 2, Funny

      i think probably here:

      Google search for "French military victories"


      ...which was actually originally a fairly clever prank to trick google...


      -----
      Check out the Uncyclopedia.org :
      The only wiki source for politically incorrect non-information about things like Kitten Huffing and Pong! the Movie !

      --
      Please allow me to hate the creator of the 120-character limit: *HATES*. Thank you.
    4. Re:France surrendering? by arahman · · Score: 1

      relax man, I know the "joke" was lame, but your just egging him on.

    5. Re:France surrendering? by thedustbustr · · Score: 1

      Since when are corperations countries? Oh, wait, I forgot, its a "partnership," not an "alliance." This is such bullshit (the thought, not the parent :P)

      --
      This sig is false.
    6. Re:France surrendering? by aussie_a · · Score: 1

      This isn't a troll, it's the exact same joke as the parent poster. However this joke offers something new by saying "France doesn't mean to surrender, the other side just misunderstands France's battle flag."

    7. Re:France surrendering? by kv9 · · Score: 2, Funny

      sinec si corperation a whurd?

    8. Re:France surrendering? by anno1a · · Score: 4, Insightful

      If memory serves right they didn't surrender the last time when a superior power tried to convince them to help invade Iraq illegally.

      --
      ------- I fumbled my registration and I now must suffer
    9. Re:France surrendering? by MightyMartian · · Score: 1, Offtopic
      Indeed, through most of the Middle Ages after the failure of the Carolingians, France was Europe's superpower. The collapse during the Franco-Prussian War can largely be blamed on the incompetence of Napoleon III and Bismark's willingness to stoop to any level to provoke a war.

      France's defeat in WWII, of course, can be blamed more on the Americans and the Brits who basically sold themselves and France up the river with ludicrous disarmament agreements. The idiocy of the Allied Powers pushed France into this suicidal disarmament. The blame should squarely go on the shoulders of the US for refusing to join the League of Nations, and for the Allies not forcing Germany back when it rearmed the Rhineland which was, for all intents and purposes, a declaration of war upon France.

      It may be difficult for Americans to understand as they stuff their faces with Freedom Fries, but the bullshit anti-French crapola they've been fed is nothing more than the ravings of historically retarded goons. Napoleon lead the French Empire to some of the most astounding military victories in the history of the human species. France managed to fight off the English for centuries before finally evicting them permanently. They've had their share of defeats, but the surrender in 1940 was written more by other hands than by their own.

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    10. Re:France surrendering? by flosofl · · Score: 1

      Why thank you, Mr. Apologist!

      --
      "This calls for a very special blend of psychology and extreme violence" - Vyvyan "The Young Ones"
    11. Re:France surrendering? by Clay+Pigeon+-TPF-VS- · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Heh. France screwed itself over by not being able to cope with blitz tactics, and relying on a fortified line which was bypassed by going through Benelux (remind anyone of WW1?)

      France had abyssimal air power compared to the Germans. They could have killed Nazi Germany while it was in the early stages of re arming, but they chose not to. They paid the price for forcing the treaty of Versailles on Germany, with all its reperations, which kept the Democratic Wiemar Republic (sp?) so weak that it was easily overtaken by the National Socialists.

      The League of Nations was a joke. It was even more impotent than the present UN. Having the US in it would not have changed that.

      --
      Viral software licensing is not freedom, it is in fact GNU/Socialism.
    12. Re:France surrendering? by mlefranc · · Score: 2, Informative

      Well, this seems to be a favorite american joke... Coming from people that cannot play rugby (or some variant thereof) without wearing helmets, that is quite amusing...Then how do you explain that sports where french have been traditionally quite good are fencing, judo, karate, rugby etc. Please take a look at the list of judo world champions by country and see where in the list France and USA appear.

      As for the article, I see slashdot as usual: many people shooting at France at first sight without having read the article. An unknown administrative staff has answered "why not" to a journalist's question and this is news? WMD in Irak was not a lesson?

      There was the same disinformation in the previous slashdot article about Jeanneney (head of Bibliothèque Nationale) on Google, where if you followed all the links, you would find out that there was really nothing as aggressive as was portrayed, just the fact the Google example should be followed. But it seems that some never like disinformation as much as when it involves french.

      Disclaimer: I have number of very close american friends. I have a lot of respect for them and so do they for me.

    13. Re:France surrendering? by jellomizer · · Score: 1

      The war in Iraq was legal. Although not properly informed of the situation, and not the best Idea. But it was legal as Iraq was breaking a lot of UN Violations. But just because it was legal doesn't mean that it was the right thing to do at the time. France had a lot of money tied into Iraq as well France has a large Muslim population, so they took a position of self interest which every country did and used whatever power they could to defend their self interest. Which included veto power. Of corse they should have thought what vetoing something like that would do to their relations.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    14. Re:France surrendering? by Agarax · · Score: 1, Funny
      Need I point out the most famous googlebomb ever?
      http://www.albinoblacksheep.com/text/victories.htm l
      FRENCH MILITARY HISTORY
      - Gallic Wars
      - Lost. In a war whose ending foreshadows the next 2000 years of French history, France is conquered by of all things, an Italian.

      - Hundred Years War
      - Mostly lost, saved at last by female schizophrenic who inadvertently creates The First Rule of French Warfare; "France's armies are victorious only when not led by a Frenchman." Sainted.

      - Italian Wars
      - Lost. France becomes the first and only country to ever lose two wars when fighting Italians.

      - Wars of Religion
      - France goes 0-5-4 against the Huguenots

      - Thirty Years War
      - France is technically not a participant, but manages to get invaded anyway. Claims a tie on the basis that eventually the other participants started ignoring her.

      - War of Revolution
      - Tied. Frenchmen take to wearing red flowerpots as chapeaux.

      - The Dutch War
      - Tied

      - War of the Augsburg League/King William's War/French and Indian War
      - Lost, but claimed as a tie. Three ties in a row induces deluded Frogophiles the world over to label the period as the height of French military power.

      - War of the Spanish Succession
      - Lost. The War also gave the French their first taste of a Marlborough, which they have loved every since.

      - American Revolution
      - In a move that will become quite familiar to future Americans, France claims a win even though the English colonists saw far more action. This is later known as "de Gaulle Syndrome", and leads to the Second Rule of French Warfare; "France only wins when America does most of the fighting."

      - French Revolution
      - Won, primarily due the fact that the opponent was also French.

      - The Napoleonic Wars
      - Lost. Temporary victories (remember the First Rule!) due to leadership of a Corsican, who ended up being no match for a British footwear designer.

      - The Franco-Prussian War
      - Lost. Germany first plays the role of drunk Frat boy to France's ugly girl home alone on a Saturday night.

      - World War I
      - Tied and on the way to losing, France is saved by the United States. Thousands of French women find out what it's like to not only sleep with a winner, but one who doesn't call her "Fraulein." Sadly, widespread use of condoms by American forces forestalls any improvement in the French bloodline.

      - World War II
      - Lost. Conquered French liberated by the United States and Britain just as they finish learning the Horst Wessel Song.

      - War in Indochina
      - Lost. French forces plead sickness; take to bed with the Dien Bien Flu

      - Algerian Rebellion
      - Lost. Loss marks the first defeat of a western army by a Non-Turkic Muslim force since the Crusades, and produces the First Rule of Muslim Warfare; "We can always beat the French." This rule is identical to the First Rules of the Italians, Russians, Germans, English, Dutch, Spanish, Vietnamese and Esquimaux.

      - War on Terrorism
      - France, keeping in mind its recent history, surrenders to Germans and Muslims just to be safe. Attempts to surrender to Vietnamese ambassador fail after he takes refuge in a McDonald's.
      --
      Remember folks, slashdot doesn't have a -1 "disagree" moderation!
    15. Re:France surrendering? by David+Off · · Score: 1

      This is such a load of bollocks.

      > France was Europe's superpower.

      Twaddle. Except for under Napoleon and to a certain extent Charlemagne (although he was a Frank) France was a weak state more intent on stabilizing and extending its own direct borders. After the defeat of the Moore's Spain was Europe's superpower.

      > The collapse during the Franco-Prussian War can largely be blamed on Bismark's willingness to stoop to any level to provoke a war.

      Bullshit. It can be blamed on a weak French government that chose to attack Germany (or the collection of states that comprised Germany) to detract from domestic problems. The French expected to walk over Germany.

      > France's defeat in WWII, of course, can be blamed more on the Americans and the Brits who basically sold themselves and France up the river with ludicrous disarmament agreements.

      Nonsense. It was the French who insisted on the luicrous disarmament agreements much to the dismay of the Americans and to some extent the British. This was payback time for 1870.

      > France managed to fight off the English for centuries before finally evicting them permanently.

      Piffle. France had a long term internal squabble with the Franco-Norman descendents of William the Conquerer who claimed certain lands in France. The English were not involved having been conquered by the Franco-Norman invaders in 1066.

    16. Re:France surrendering? by Ocrad · · Score: 1
      The war in Iraq was legal. Although not properly informed of the situation, and not the best Idea. But it was legal as Iraq was breaking a lot of UN Violations.
      AFAIK Israel has violated more UN resolutions than Iraq. Why haven't the USA invaded Israel already?
    17. Re:France surrendering? by wazza · · Score: 1

      France had abyssimal air power compared to the Germans.

      I can't help but see strange images in my head of French DW.520s zooming up into the sky from big holes in the ground.

      Must've been bloody scary!

    18. Re:France surrendering? by sumdumass · · Score: 1

      What does israel have to do with this?

      First lets get our timeline striaght. iraq invades a neiboring country for no apearant reason other then greed, The us along with a support form several other countries repell the invasion in what is called a war. On marck 3 1991 Iraq signes an armistice/ceas fire agreement that they intend to violate.

      Lets skip to modern day now and recap the event that led upto the iraq invasion. Iraq has not held upto its armistice agreement. It has violated somewere in the area of 1200 resolutions that were made to recetefy the situation. After much frustration and much manuvering from both those for and against iraq, the UN declare that iraq has not giving full faith and credit to thier armistice agreement previously signed. The UN has also declared that because iraq waviered on thier agreement that they have violated it and the terms of cease fire. This is certianly in support of the 1907 hague regulations wich are still in effect today and state that if a party to an armistice violates its terms, as Iraq was believed to have done, then the other party may be entitled to end the armistice.

      What does those circomstances have to do with israel? My guess is nothing. If you have somethign constructive to say against israel then i would suggest putting it into a proper context. You are adding nothing to the discusion other then your hatred for a country that isn't even in the mix. Even with the original gulf war, israel stayed out of it completly even after being peppered by scud missles from iraq. If israel has problems with the international comunity, or has has UN sanctions that they have violated placed against them, then they need to be considered in the context that they were applied.

      It apears that what you are trying to acomplish here is either an rather ill informed attempt to cite action against another country or a propaganda attemp at confusing issue to make one side area more corect then another. You are trying to stretch the cause for action agianst one country to include the action against another when it is inapropriate to do so. Israel might have some issues that need dealt with but those dealings need to be held in context to the situations surounding them. To ignore facts just to prove a different point is misleading if not just ignorant

      The facts are facts, it was open season on iraq because they them selves didn't hold true to the actions they took in an attempt to aviod what should have went on 12 years ago. Resolution after resolution gave iraq enough time to comply to its agreements and they decided not to. This is as simple as it gets. Israel has nothign to do with it either.

    19. Re:France surrendering? by jellomizer · · Score: 1

      Just because it is legal to do something it doesn't mean that you had to do it. The Iraq war was legal. If the US wanted a war with Israel and they pointed out all the UN resolutions that Israel broke then it would be legal too. But the US has a lot of investments in Israel, just like french had in Iraq, so the US will probably do the same thing as the french did in the UN to block the war with Israel. The only real difference, is that the US has the most powerful military in the world. So any military action with the US will be hard, long and costly. I never said the war with Iraq was the right decision just that it was legal. Like it is legal for you crap in your pants except getting up and going to the bathroom, but it may not be the best choice.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    20. Re:France surrendering? by benzapp · · Score: 1

      France did try/want to stop Germany. Remember, it was the French who declared war on Germany, not the other way around. Germany also waited for over a year for the French to withdrawal their declaration of war.

      As for the Blitz tactics themselves, to an extent... the invasion of France relied less on them than most people think. Going straight for the capital was a move championed by Napolean. So the Germans circumvented the fortifications... they DIDN'T however strike where the French least expected it. Speed is only one component of the Blitz, striking where the enemy least expects it is the other most important part.

      France lost because it was their corrupt politicians who wanted war, not the people. We live in this fantasy world where the French are these perpetually hedonistic libertines. I think most are going to be very surprised when France is the vanguard in the redemption of Europe.

      --
      I don't read or respond to AC posts
    21. Re:France surrendering? by RWerp · · Score: 1

      Point out any resolution passed by the Security Council which Israel broke.

      --
      "Long run is a misleading guide to current affairs. In the long run we are all dead." (John Maynard Keynes)
  3. Yup, lots of similarities by Godman · · Score: 5, Funny

    They are both filthy stinkin rich, hate google, and dream of a new world order?

    --
    I have this really funny quote that I like to put here. Unfortunately, there's this really annoying thing called a char
    1. Re:Yup, lots of similarities by Guylhem · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Oh my god. At this very moment I'm so ashamed of being french. Could someone please pass the cluestick to Chirac?

      It's not because he don't like what's being done by google/gutemberg/whatever that he should pledge alliance to the evil empire. What's the point of going with Microsoft?

      Forget negociations! This is *wrong*, period. Nothing can justify it.

      What's next? An alliance with McDonalds if Jojo decides to open restaurants in France ?

    2. Re:Yup, lots of similarities by Guppy06 · · Score: 4, Funny

      "Could someone please pass the cluestick to Chirac?"

      Quick! What's a clue-by-four in SI?

    3. Re:Yup, lots of similarities by PopCulture · · Score: 3, Interesting

      maybe if the US gov't hadn't completely bailed out of the anti-trust case, microsoft- a company that makes operating systems, office productivity tools, databases and development platforms- wouldn't be the only obvious choice to oppose google (who has been less than receptive to this particular customer's wishes, as documented on slashdot many times before...

      basically there's enough blame to go around I guess.

      --

      Here's to finally giving Bush his exit strategy in November
    4. Re:Yup, lots of similarities by Idarubicin · · Score: 4, Informative
      Quick! What's a clue-by-four in SI?

      That would be a ken-by-ten .

      --
      ~Idarubicin
    5. Re:Yup, lots of similarities by bluephone · · Score: 2, Insightful
      " Oh my god. At this very moment I'm so ashamed of being french."

      Maybe you could explain to me, honestly, why France seems to feel the need to reinvent EVERYTHING and give it a French spin? It's as though nothing is good enough unless there's an accented character in the name. This is just another perfect example, although I'm stunned they'd partner with MS, as that's just another US giant. I'd expect them to go with some French company.

      Basically, why must France do things differently just for the reason of being different? If there's a valid reason, that's one thing, but JUST to be different, that's just obnoxious and a waste of resources.

      --
      jX [ Make everything as simple as possible, but no simpler. - Einstein ]
    6. Re:Yup, lots of similarities by Guylhem · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I wish I knew. I don't like waste of resources either. There's no point in being different just for the sake of being different as you mentionned.In this case it's even ironic - going with microsoft to counter the anglo-saxon centric digital library!!!

      My guess is that it must be some ego problem for some politician who feel bad his/her pet project is so lame when compared with google's one.

    7. Re:Yup, lots of similarities by southpolesammy · · Score: 1

      Let's think about this for a second from an American and Linux biased perspective. Gates and Chirac are all chummy together, and at some later date the US reapplies pressure on Microsoft, Ballmer and Gates finally say, "Nah, don't need you America", and bail Redmond to setup HQ in Paris.

      So basically, it would be yet another reason to hate the French and Microsoft. Where's the downside here?

      --
      Rule #1 -- Politics always trumps technology.
    8. Re:Yup, lots of similarities by jdgeorge · · Score: 5, Insightful

      They are both filthy stinkin rich, hate google, and dream of a new world order?

      On one hand, the first item in that list is a documented fact. On the other hand, the comment is, as a whole, a troll. Curiously, most of the posts that follow are even less interested in the facts.

      It is interesting how unapologetically ignorant so many my fellow US citizens are willing to be when they:

      1. Didn't realize that the Slashdot summary misrepresented the nature of Chirac's comment, because they
      2. Obviously didn't read the linked article, and
      3. Have the opportunity to hurl invective at the most popular target of insecure American white trash.

      American journalism, thy name is Slashdot.

    9. Re:Yup, lots of similarities by Godman · · Score: 1

      It was meant to be funny. I actually did read the article.

      As per number 3, if you are slamming, me, then that makes you insecure American white trash.

      --
      I have this really funny quote that I like to put here. Unfortunately, there's this really annoying thing called a char
    10. Re:Yup, lots of similarities by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Even in France Chirac is hated . During the last presidential elections where he was running there were huge protests with the slogan: "vote for the crook, not the nazi" and they were asking the people to vote FOR Chirac. The guy has more brains than Bush (who hasn't) but he is probably even more corrupt. (ELF scandal anyone?) Just because he was on the right side of the last dirty war doesn't make him a saint. Don't forget that he was the one in the mid '90s who resumed testing nuclear bombs in the Pacific, when the rest of the world had given up on that sort of thing.

      In a way, I admire the pompous gasbag, but I would never trust him.

    11. Re:Yup, lots of similarities by Jedi+Alec · · Score: 1

      sounds a bit like the whole courriel(sp?) thing a couple of years ago.

      for those from outside france, at some point, think it was around the beginning of 2001, some smartass in the french government decided that from that point on, all usage of the word e-mail in official government texts was to be replaced by the newly invented word "courriel" which is basically a fancy way of saying courier electronique, electronic mail.

      kinda pointless to try and eradicate a word that's been around for years...

      --

      People replying to my sig annoy me. That's why I change it all the time.
    12. Re:Yup, lots of similarities by snilloc · · Score: 1

      My fav was 'cederom' (accents in there, iirc). They took an English acronym (CD-ROM) and made it exactly the same thing, only French.

    13. Re:Yup, lots of similarities by roard · · Score: 1
      Non..

      As far as I remember, it was not a proposal by the french government, it was the french academy, the ones that are in charge of the dictionaire. And it wasn't the word "courriel" (a rather nice word imho, invented by the Quebecois) but the word "mél" which is indeed, awful. I don't remember a government policy of using the word "courriel", but if that was the case, why not ? this word sounds better than "mail", frankly.

      Trying to push "mél" and "cédérom" was quite stupid. "Courriel" on the other hand is nice and a good contraction from "Courrier électronique" -- like email.

      In any cases, nobody is forced to use "Courriel" or "Mél" (berk!). But I for example ofent use "Courriel", just because I think it sounds better.

    14. Re:Yup, lots of similarities by hawk · · Score: 1

      >On the other hand, the comment is, as a whole, a troll.

      yes, but not for the reason you suggest.

      France dreams not of a *new* world order, but of the return of an older order in which (rightly or wrongly) they were perceived as dominant.

      >3. Have the opportunity to hurl invective at the
      >most popular target of insecure American white trash.

      speaking of ignorance . . . white trash generally can't afford computers, and thus couldn't read slashdot.

      hawk

  4. Soo.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    France is evil. Just as we suspected...

  5. wow by mbrewthx · · Score: 2, Funny

    J'utilize Linux

    --
    __________ Leave me alone I'm compiling a RPG II program on my S/36...Thanks to metamucil I'm a Regular Meta Moderator
    1. Re:wow by mbrewthx · · Score: 1

      Well my wife did it for me and it's been 15 years since she lived in France or taught French.

      --
      __________ Leave me alone I'm compiling a RPG II program on my S/36...Thanks to metamucil I'm a Regular Meta Moderator
  6. Oh well by The-Bus · · Score: 4, Funny

    If it's anything like my Outlook PST file, it will be able to hold about 1000 documents, then not work as well.

    Sounds fun!

    --

    Small potatoes make the steak look bigger.

    1. Re:Oh well by justsomebody · · Score: 1

      That would be 1001 then (if I take to acount PR talk)

      --
      Signature Pro version 1.13.2-3 release 83.5 beta3try7 after-breakfast edition
  7. So does Google then become... by tquinlan · · Score: 4, Funny

    ...a "freedom engine"? ;)

    --
    DBA? Software Engineer? My company is hiring! Click
  8. What I see by bogaboga · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I see some kind of retaliation or what I'd call divide & rule, by the French government. "If you do not cooperate, (read `pay for content') I will go to your rival(s)." M$ used this against IBM on a limited level in the 80s and they succeeded to some extent.

    1. Re:What I see by Earered · · Score: 5, Informative

      Because France (and the rest of Europe) is in a position of weakness when it comes to ebook.

      The BNF http://www.bnf.fr/ has attempted too early to scan lots of books, without the right plan.

      The result? a bunch of low res image in locked PDF (can't select and copy) of some two hundred years books.

      What google has done, is making a few people think in France: hey! We have completly fucked up our electronic library!
      Given that it has costed several millions to citizen without any results,
      maybe we should try to not suck so that the docile citizen do not notice the millions of euros which have been stupidly spent for a totaly useless project!

    2. Re:What I see by fluce · · Score: 1
      BNF digital library (Gallica) contains only public domain books and documents. They are freely available and printable.

      It's true that these documents are only pictures : no full text searches, and no text selections. That's why you can't select and copy from PDF. You can copy and select as image.

      The original goal of Gallica was to make available precious and old books that are not available to everybody.

    3. Re:What I see by dvdeug · · Score: 1

      The result? a bunch of low res image in locked PDF (can't select and copy) of some two hundred years books

      And it's far more important to culture to scan the latest Photoshop books? The reason you can't select and copy is because there's no OCR.

      which have been stupidly spent for a totaly useless project!

      The Gallica archive at BNF has been a wonderful source for Distributed Proofreaders and from them, Project Gutenberg, with BHF's blessing. Their scans have been far from useless.

    4. Re:What I see by Earered · · Score: 1

      I stand corrected on the ability to select images, this wasn't the case some 4 years ago (yes there was be copy protection)

      But please, look at this document on "Marine Militaire de France: abus et réforme 1790" http://visualiseur.bnf.fr/Visualiseur?Destination= Gallica&O=NUMM-44457
      and now tell me that money hasn't been stupidly spent.

      I have used gallica, and I know how importants some of those books are. But scanning books whose text is available in image, or with such a low quality, prevent casual use or futur OCR if the techniques becomes reliable enough to be used on those books.

  9. This thread is a placeholder by alphakappa · · Score: 5, Funny

    for all the French+Bill Gates jokes

    --
    "When the only tool you own is a hammer, every problem begins to resemble a nail." - Abraham Maslow (1908-1970)
  10. bargaining chip by kaleco · · Score: 2, Insightful
    'so as not to negotiate from a position of weakness'

    It seems to me that it is unlikely that the French government will align themselves with such a symbol of US cultural imperialism. Therefore, I suspect that the implied use of MS as a bargaining chip with google is correct.

    --
    Prosperity is only an instrument to be used, not a deity to be worshipped. Calvin Coolidge
    1. Re:bargaining chip by focitrixilous+P · · Score: 1
      'so as not to negotiate from a position of weakness'

      Hey, there's a first time for everything.

      --
      SAILING MISHAP
    2. Re:bargaining chip by killjoe · · Score: 1

      Aren't there French of european companies that can do something like this? SAP? Seibel? Mandrake?

      I would think there would be at least one company in Europe that is capable of doing something like this and I bet they would love the contract.

      --
      evil is as evil does
    3. Re:bargaining chip by Rayonic · · Score: 2, Insightful

      > such a symbol of US cultural imperialism

      Huh? What culture does Microsoft export? None that I really know of. At least not compared to Disney, McDonalds, Coca-Cola, etc., etc.

      Of course, the whole notion of "Cultural Imperialism" is bullshit anyways, at least when it comes to the United States.

    4. Re:bargaining chip by ageforce_ · · Score: 2, Informative
      I actually read the article (not just the blog), and it's even less than that.
      I'll try to quote the phrase:
      "Would the president consider a meeting with Google's concurrent Microsoft, as he converges in so many point of views with its president Bill Gates, [...]? 'Why not?' answered the president."

      AFAICS Chirac didn't even say they have so many views in common. And replying "Why not?" from a politician counts next to nothing...

    5. Re:bargaining chip by kwoff · · Score: 1
      it is a tool for capitalist presentation.
      LOL. We're going to have to reboot this one.
  11. Alright, this is getting downright bizarre by ZackSchil · · Score: 3, Funny

    I have nothing against the French but what's next? France decides SCO's case has merit, claims jurisdiction? I'm just confused. It just seems odd that the country that takes issue with Google's helpful, automated services because they occasionally violate copyright is considering working with Microsoft, the king of anti-trust! No wonder the French people are so jaded.

    1. Re:Alright, this is getting downright bizarre by Keeper · · Score: 1

      I think they just miss the Iraqi Information Minister, and have decided to take his place in world politics...

  12. "not to negotiate from a position of weakness" by Qzukk · · Score: 3, Insightful

    When negotiating with Microsoft, is there anyone who can NOT negotiate from a position of weakness?

    --
    If I have been able to see further than others, it is because I bought a pair of binoculars.
    1. Re:"not to negotiate from a position of weakness" by ettlz · · Score: 3, Funny

      The electricity company.

    2. Re:"not to negotiate from a position of weakness" by Guppy06 · · Score: 1

      Nintendo.

    3. Re:"not to negotiate from a position of weakness" by mav[LAG] · · Score: 1

      I would say anyone who has released (or uses) code under a license which says the user can freely copy, modify and distribute it as long as they pass those freedoms on. That's a position of strength. Microsoft can't threaten, bargain with or buy such people - and they hate it.
      I had a letter from the Software Gestapo once. When I replied that they were welcome to audit my infrastructure as long as they a) obtained a court order and b) made their auditing tools available under the GPL and runnable under Linux (since that's all I have), I heard nothing more.

      --
      --- Hot Shot City is particularly good.
    4. Re:"not to negotiate from a position of weakness" by aussie_a · · Score: 1

      Why people choose to deal with Microsoft is quite possibly because Microsoft probably provides nice benefits to the decision makers of big deals.

      Well that, and no-one's been fired for choosing Microsoft.

    5. Re:"not to negotiate from a position of weakness" by ggvaidya · · Score: 1

      Yes, a few. :)

    6. Re:"not to negotiate from a position of weakness" by deaddrunk · · Score: 1

      Nice one :)

      --
      Does a Christian soccer team even need a goalkeeper?
  13. Proprietary Formats by doktor-hladnjak · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Perhaps the saddest part about France going to Microsoft for this project is that whatever data is produced is more likely to be locked into some proprietary format. That could be particularly unfortunate, since these cultural resources really belong to all the people of France and should therefore be made as accessible as possible.

    1. Re:Proprietary Formats by ArsSineArtificio · · Score: 3, Funny

      Perhaps the saddest part about France going to Microsoft for this project is that whatever data is produced is more likely to be locked into some proprietary format.

      That's a needlessly harsh way to refer to the French language. The proper term is "an obsolete format".

      --
      All employees must wash hands before seeking equitable relief.
    2. Re:Proprietary Formats by ArsenneLupin · · Score: 3, Insightful
      That could be particularly unfortunate, since these cultural resources really belong to all the people of France

      ... and beyond! French is not only spoken in France, but also in Canada, large parts of Africa, Belgium, and lots of other places as well.

      Shouldn't these other countries also have a say about what happens to the French culture?

    3. Re:Proprietary Formats by Jules+Labrie · · Score: 1

      I don't know what I can answer to such a stupid post. Don't you ignorant know they are other languages in the world, the majority of them don't even have writing system ? Do you really thing your english is 'superior' ? The parent was interesting; that's my biggest worry in fact.And what about the open formats google is using ?

    4. Re:Proprietary Formats by Jules+Labrie · · Score: 1

      Not your courage, obviously.

  14. Nice, Zonk! by pHatidic · · Score: 1
    from the le-goog dept.

    best. department. evar.

    1. Re:Nice, Zonk! by Ohreally_factor · · Score: 1

      I've noticed that Zonk is doing a better job after his last fuck up (and subsequent "cover up"). Let's give credit where credit is due. (Almost 36 hours since that screw up! Woo hoo! =)

      Just don't do too good a job, Zonk. I'm looking forward to the next time I can heap abuse upon your head. It's become my favorite part of slashdot.

      --
      It's not offtopic, dumbass. It's orthogonal.
  15. The irony by CrackedButter · · Score: 2, Insightful

    is that the french are very nationalist and I would of thought they would of done something with a European or at least a French software outfit. I thought they were scared of globalisation and were worried about their identity being lost on the world stage. So to cure this fear they choose MS.

    1. Re:The irony by stygianguest · · Score: 1

      Part of the problem may be that the project in question is huge. It is not a problem an avarage software company can solve. The expertise required may not even be available in france. But I don't know anything about french software companies. I just know, I don't know any, which may be because they do not exist.

    2. Re:The irony by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      France is not anywhere as nationalistic as the United States.

    3. Re:The irony by CrackedButter · · Score: 2

      So true Mr AC...

    4. Re:The irony by pipingguy · · Score: 1


      "would of"?

      Do you speak Anglais?

    5. Re:The irony by Ohreally_factor · · Score: 1

      You're forgetting that France was a founding member of the EEC, predecessor to the EU, and has been very influential because of that. With the EU aligned with France, France isn't really "scared" of globalization so much as actively looking for ways to exploit it for their own benefit (like everyone else).

      However, if they did look to MS, that would be pretty ironic. That's a big if. Nothing really indicates that they're going to do this, other than statements that they're not ruling it out. The whole underlying motive for France to create this digital library is national pride, as you point out, so I think it's pretty unlikely that they'd contract this out to MS.

      --
      It's not offtopic, dumbass. It's orthogonal.
    6. Re:The irony by MORB · · Score: 2, Funny

      Sadly, it wouldn't be the first time the clowns that govern us say one thing and do something contradictory. We're not that different from americans. We are arrogant, nationalistic, and we have our own jerk of a president that we were dumb enough to elect twice.

    7. Re:The irony by CrackedButter · · Score: 1

      Lets get this straight, the AC is insightful and I agree with him but I AM a troll. You mods are fucking stupid no doubt about it.

    8. Re:The irony by CrackedButter · · Score: 1

      fuck off grammer nazi.

  16. Rooting for the Underdog by osewa77 · · Score: 4, Funny

    It is a well known fact that European governments prefer to support the under-dog: "Go Bill, go Bill, go!"

    1. Re:Rooting for the Underdog by PornMaster · · Score: 1

      Usually they supply the underdog with Mirage fighter jets.

    2. Re:Rooting for the Underdog by 01000011011101000111 · · Score: 1

      It's ok, everyone - we don't have to worry about M$ launching mirage wings against *nix servers... They'll get halfway down the runway then the plane'll turn blue (not to mention stopping) and they'll have to restart...

      --
      Programming is an Art. I am an Artist. Does that mean I get to wear a daft hat?
  17. Great.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    Now the French can leverage the power of DRM to keep their military failures in the last century a secret!

  18. Time to rename something. by kryogen1x · · Score: 1

    We can't let France do that can we? No more Windows XP, from now on it will be known as FREEDOM XP.

  19. World Domination by nurb432 · · Score: 1

    The plan is coming together, just a tad slower then they had hoped.

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
    1. Re:World Domination by GNUALMAFUERTE · · Score: 1

      World Domination?, You mean France, Google, or Micro$oft? ;-)

      --
      WTF am I doing replying to an AC at 5 A.M on a Friday night?
  20. Well,,, by mbrewthx · · Score: 5, Funny

    Moi, j'aime bien nos maitres francais des biblioteque borg.

    --
    __________ Leave me alone I'm compiling a RPG II program on my S/36...Thanks to metamucil I'm a Regular Meta Moderator
    1. Re:Well,,, by Godman · · Score: 1

      I, never learned our french mothers of Library Borg?

      --
      I have this really funny quote that I like to put here. Unfortunately, there's this really annoying thing called a char
    2. Re:Well,,, by ettlz · · Score: 1

      I think this was meant to say, "I, for one, welcome our French Borg library overlords."

    3. Re:Well,,, by mbrewthx · · Score: 1

      That's it my wife is fired, I'm done with the French jokes!!!!!

      --
      __________ Leave me alone I'm compiling a RPG II program on my S/36...Thanks to metamucil I'm a Regular Meta Moderator
    4. Re:Well,,, by MORB · · Score: 3, Informative

      Nice try :p

      "Pour ma part, je souhaite la bienvenue à nos nouveaux maîtres français des bibliothèques borg."

    5. Re:Well,,, by Guppy06 · · Score: 2, Funny

      "That's it my wife is fired,"

      Really? Would you mind forwarding her resume over?

    6. Re:Well,,, by wdebruij · · Score: 1

      moi, pour un, acceuill nos nouveaux overlords Redmond.

      (yeah, the french stinks. I'm taking lessons)

  21. French? by untouchable · · Score: 3, Insightful

    What's wrong with the french?

    French good deeds this year: 2
    French bad deeds this year: 5
    Le sigh . . . .
    --
    As Seen On TV's? Come back!!!
    1. Re:French? by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

      What were the two good deeds?

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    2. Re:French? by untouchable · · Score: 1

      1 and 2.

      --
      As Seen On TV's? Come back!!!
  22. all hail the french google poodle (link) by googisgod · · Score: 1
  23. Re:now there's one more reason to hate france by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    support of terrorists

    uh, huh? disagree with bomb-mad bush and you're a terrorist?

    Support of terrorism?
    How about the US funding the IRA to the tune of $100 million dollars a year - all used to plant car-bombs in shopping centers or to run "taxi-driver murder" campaigns.

    You know fuck-all.

  24. To quote Westwing by SweenyTod · · Score: 2, Funny

    Wow, it seems you don't need to fire a shot now to get the French to surrender to somebody hell bent on taking over the world!

    --
    Alas gallinaceas de urbe bovis volo
    1. Re:To quote Westwing by droopycom · · Score: 1

      What episode was that ?

      Thanks

  25. Great French Decisions Throughout History by NoMoreNicksLeft · · Score: 2, Funny

    1760s: The indians can be relied upon to help drive the british from america
    1803: Let's sell the Louisiana Territories
    1934: Let's overlook Germany's military buildup

    1. Re:Great French Decisions Throughout History by k2r · · Score: 1, Insightful

      There's even more:
      1778 signing treaties of alliance with America, agreeing on staying at war until America was independend. To abandoned by their allies later on.

    2. Re:Great French Decisions Throughout History by Mettra · · Score: 1

      Your sig seems to be appropriate advice here for the French.

    3. Re:Great French Decisions Throughout History by MightyMartian · · Score: 1
      1934: Let's overlook Germany's military buildup

      That wasn't France's fault, that was the fault of Britain and the US for forcing France into disarmament and then pretty much standing by while the Rhineland was reoccupied. It's a pretty twisted reading of history that blames France for that, considering it was France that suffered the severest damage during WWI of any country in Western Europe.

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    4. Re:Great French Decisions Throughout History by Narchie+Troll · · Score: 1

      1777: Let's help win the independence of a bunch of worthless ungrateful shitheads

  26. doesn't seem like a great idea.. by Pinefresh · · Score: 1

    Your biological and technological distinctiveness will be added to our own

  27. Re:Views in common? by kfg · · Score: 1

    So; Chirac, Bill and Linus walk into a bistro:

    Linus says to Chirac, "C'est magnifique! Mais c'est ne pas la Google."

    KFG

  28. Re:now there's one more reason to hate france by PainBot · · Score: 1

    It's funny how a post like this, which is full of crap gets a socre of 2, and the two intelligent replies I read got a whopping 0.

    Way to go, Slashdoters, you're looking like a bunch of racist rednecks.

  29. Oooh La La by the+eric+conspiracy · · Score: 3, Funny

    So Microsoft has just bought France to go along with their acquisition of evil?
    Sounds like a matched set to me.

  30. Re:Do you Americans know... by Godman · · Score: 1

    No, the terrorists probably just get a bigger rush from destroying a powerful country.

    Think about it. It happens everywhere. Nobody wants to see the little guy lose. In american courts, everybody is happy when a big corp. loses a case, since everyone thinks that the "big corporations" are doing evil by impressing their will on the general populace.

    The same thing happens with America. The terrorists see some kind of injustice in the fact that we live (for the most part) richly, and they have to scrounge out a living. They are just jealous of the power and affluence we have. That's why France isn't getting bombed....

    --
    I have this really funny quote that I like to put here. Unfortunately, there's this really annoying thing called a char
  31. omgggzzz by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    soooo many accent marks in that article

  32. Something that would make more sense .. by RedLaggedTeut · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Something that would make sense would be cooperating with a big canadian software company, since Canadians speak french too.

    The rest has been said by others, I've nothing to add.

    --
    I'm still trying to figure out what people mean by 'social skills' here.
  33. As the perl masters would say... by ghostunit · · Score: 1

    The french decide Google's perceived hegemony in electronic document archiving is a problem.

    "What company could stand against Google? I know, I will for Microsoft's help!!"

    The french now have 2 problems.

  34. Re:now there's one more reason to hate france by neil.pearce · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Hmm. I read your gibberish post, and then examined the opening statement of your last post...

    I am a high school history teacher...

    I'd be fuckin' scared/annoyed/upset if you taught my children.

    You're so stupid, it's almost funny

  35. Wha?? by Ghostgate · · Score: 1

    French President Jacques Chirac would consider a partnership with Microsoft 'since he has so many views in common with its president, Bill Gates'.

    Chirac siding with an American president. Now I've seen it all!

  36. politics and business by gad_zuki! · · Score: 1

    Reminds me of another domestic bargaining chip.

    Manager: "Well, our techies say we could move some of our stuff over to linux."

    MS: "How about some fat discounts?"

    You're right, this is negotiation and its part of businesss as well as politics.

    The article is essentially some non-denials from Chirac's advisors. Not exactly a done deal.

  37. Re:Do you Americans know... by flabbergast · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Come on! We're Americans! Do you think we *care* what everyone else thinks?

    All joking aside, regardless of my feelings towards the French, which are pretty close to neutral, this does seem contrary to their nationlistic zeal to keep France French. I (like other posters) assumed that the government would come up with its own solution. It seems absurd that France would team up with that oh so American company Microsoft to thwart that other oh so American company Google.

    P.S. The US was attacked by terrorists because of numerous things, but name calling is not one of them.
    P.P.S. The rest of the world bashes the US. Don't you think we get tired of that?

  38. Euro Disney by Stalyn · · Score: 1

    Come'on, my children they need wine!

    --
    The best education consists in immunizing people against systematic attempts at education. - Paul Feyerabend
  39. Re:now there's one more reason to hate france by ZeroPost · · Score: 1

    Which two intelligent replies would those be? :-P

    P.S. Don't feed the trolls.

  40. If I were Bill... by NitroWolf · · Score: 1

    If I were Bill Gates, I'd be suing France for defamatory remarks against me. Who wants to be linked to France in the manner of "So many views in common."

    On the other hand, if were Bill, I'd probably just declare war on France instead.

  41. In other news by FudRucker · · Score: 1

    Mandrakesoft maker of the Mandrake Linux distro closes their offices in France and moves their headquarters to Brazil...

    --
    Politics is Treachery, Religion is Brainwashing
    1. Re:In other news by FudRucker · · Score: 1

      your right, they should move to Amsterdam Holland...

      --
      Politics is Treachery, Religion is Brainwashing
  42. Now, everybody hates the French by mnmn · · Score: 1

    And they wonder why.

    Jokes aside, a large part of opensource software devleopers have been french, just read the sourcecode and search for .fr email addresses. That means these actions of France will not be politically supportable.

    In corporate circles, Bill Gates is admired for being a shrewd businessman, books on him are read by managers and enterpreneurs. However rank-and-file software developers know better and admire good product design.

    --
    "Give orange me give eat orange me eat orange give me eat orange give me you." -Nim Chimpsky
  43. Not a position of weakness, but... by pegasustonans · · Score: 1

    so as not to negotiate from a position of weakness

    So, they prefer to negotiate from a position of stupidity?

    --
    And all our yesterdays have lighted fools The way to dusty death. --Will
  44. MOD PARENT UP by BarryNorton · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    I refuse to post this anonymously: this place makes me sick!

    The knee-jerk racism that a large proportion of Slashdotters display is very much tied in with the reason there's so much bad feeling against the United States out in the rest of the world...

    1. Re:MOD PARENT UP by tyler_larson · · Score: 1
      The knee-jerk racism that a large proportion of Slashdotters display is very much tied in with the reason there's so much bad feeling against the United States out in the rest of the world...

      Yes, there's nothing that makes Iranians more mad at Americans than racist remarks toward the French.

      The whole Israel thing just fans the flames that have been burning for centuries.

      --
      "With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine. However, this is not necessarily a good idea...."
      RFC 1925
  45. Google should just tell France+MSFT by Man+in+Spandex · · Score: 1

    ta mere

    That will solve everything I *assure you!

    * assurance not guaranteed

  46. This web site says it all. by Treacle+Treatment · · Score: 1


    Interestingly enough there is a site dedicated to those of us who truly admire france.

    http://www.fuckfrance.com/

    --
    TT
  47. Read the actual article before you comment!!! by jp8000 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Does someone realize that Chirac never actually talked about partnering with Microsoft??? Not even close?
    This post relates to ANOTHER post which translates ANOTHER article in a French newspaper which says that some UNNAMED assistant to Chirac when asked about the possibility of partnering with Microsoft answered "why not?" (which does not seem like a terrible answer..., there is no reason to dismiss anybody before the project is launched...).

    1. Re:Read the actual article before you comment!!! by twofidyKidd · · Score: 1

      You're new here, aren't you?

      --


      Hades, PoD: Official Advocate
    2. Re:Read the actual article before you comment!!! by Lemmy+Caution · · Score: 2, Insightful

      What is truly horrifying about this is that the threads have gone on this long without anyone pointing this out. I really have to bookmark this discussion - whenever I describe the collapse of critical thought among soi-disant "smart" people, particularly in America, I'll paste this link back to them.

    3. Re:Read the actual article before you comment!!! by Tonytheloony · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Yes, you are of course correct. But any article with the word french in it leads to the ultimate troll unfortunately.
      Most people don't care for fact, they prefer canned explanations for what is happening.

      --
      The quickest way to become an atheist is to study the Bible thoroughly.
    4. Re:Read the actual article before you comment!!! by bravni · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Mod parent up!

      My understanding is that bashing/hating people is a popular sport in the anglo-saxon culture, and now that it is not politically correct to target the Black people/the native American people/etc any more, the French get blasted.

      Just because some guy in the government made some vague comment.

      Seems like hating the whole American people because of the US government foolishness makes sense then...

      Honestly, how dare some of you talk about anti-American sentiment in France when you read some of the comments on this thread. Nobody in France, bare the most extremist people, would be half as insulting as the majority here. And then they might try to base it off actual information...

      This is on par with what you'd expect from the Yahoo boards.

      Shame on you.

    5. Re:Read the actual article before you comment!!! by dvdeug · · Score: 1

      My understanding is that bashing/hating people is a popular sport in the anglo-saxon culture

      Let's start out showing our biases by bashing the Anglo-Saxon culture, shall we? We could ask the Algerians and Vietnamese how much love they felt from the French. Or how much love the Germans felt from the French at the end of WWI, when the Germans were slapped with six decades of ruinous, punative fines by the French.

      Speaking of the Germans, and while we're at it, the Poles, Russians, Romanians and Arabs among others, why don't we ask the Jews? There are reasons the country with the most Jews in the world is the United States, and the US is only one of two countries in the world that is more than 1% Jewish.

      We can talk about the deep abiding love the Hutus and Tutsis have for each other, and many other peoples, but I think I've made my point.

  48. Re:Do you Americans know... by Guppy06 · · Score: 1

    First off, considering the recent ruling to ban "overt religious symbols" such as head scarves in schools, I think French-bashing is one of the things the US and Wahabiists have in common.

    Secondly, if this isn't a reason to make fun of the government in Paris, I don't know what is.

  49. Re:now there's one more reason to hate france by rokzy · · Score: 3, Insightful

    > if it wasn't their support of terrorists, their ingratiating manner about our saving their asses twice, and the fact that they are as useless as tits on a nun, now i have another reason.

    in the words of Simon Pegg:

    what a prick.

  50. Re:Do you Americans know... by mrchaotica · · Score: 2

    I'm inclined to bash anybody who chooses MS over Free Software. The fact that they're French this time is only a coincidence.

    --

    "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

  51. Obligatory French Military Link... by coulls · · Score: 1

    For those who don't know about this:
    http://www.albinoblacksheep.com/text/france.html

    Interesting little timeline showing major battles in French history (note the lack of victories).

    1. Re:Obligatory French Military Link... by GnarlyNome · · Score: 1

      "- War in Indochina
      - Lost. French forces plead sickness; take to bed with the Dien Bien Flu"

      We can see here how the author is smart and cultured.
      It's Dien Bien Phu, no Dien Bien Flu.
      Besides, must I remind the great US' victory in the same country ? (Indochina = Vietnam for those who gone into US' public's school)
      ovouisly they didn't teach you in your french school about puns

      --
      Diplomacy is the art of saying "Nice doggie" until you can find a rock. Will Rogers
    2. Re:Obligatory French Military Link... by Narchie+Troll · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately, the bit about the American Revolution was utter bullshit. If it wasn't for the French, the Americans might very well have been answering to the English monarch for a good while longer.

  52. Easy Example by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Here's an easy to use example of how not to negotiate with Microsoft from a position of weakness:

    MS: Hello, we would like to negotiate with you.

    Me: Fuck off.

  53. Kids today... by eomnimedia · · Score: 1

    France and Microsoft,
    Sitting in a tree,
    K-I-S-S-I-N-G.

    First came love,
    Then came marriage,
    Then came Satan.

    1. Re:Kids today... by ggvaidya · · Score: 1

      First came love,

      Then came marriage,

      Then came Satan.


      Then came IE. And people wanted Satan back ...

  54. No-France is intent on its opinion of being French by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    France is only defending its culture as it sees fit.

    It is no big deal because digitization of French language works will only hasten their translation to other languages.

    I would welcome being able to read some of the specialized French language scientific journals in my native language.

  55. What goes around... by Game+Genie · · Score: 1

    I seem to remember some reports a while back about municipalities using Linux as a pawn to get better licensing agreements with MS. I think I will die laughing if the French are manipulating MS in the same way.

  56. Isn't It Finally Time... by xelph · · Score: 1

    that Slashdot created a top level icon for french bashing subjects? This is long overdue. Bill has his own Slashdot icon, so sacrebleu why can't Jacques?

  57. CHOWDA by Heem · · Score: 2, Funny

    Say it frenchie! CHOWDA!

    --
    Don't Tread on Me
  58. He, you Anglosaxons might have a point :-) by BerntB · · Score: 3, Insightful
    Being Swedish, I've always thought it was quite strange, this attitude from US and English towards the French.

    I've never met anyone from France that was rude and refused to try to speak English -- quite the opposite.

    I've heard it argued that Americans go to Paris to "see France" -- and their opinions about the French is more or less similar to the common French opinion about people living in Paris... :-)

    It has been a bit frustrating, when the "frogs" don't live up to the image I get from being steeped in the literature of English speaking (or mangling) cultures.

    But I'll have to change opinion now. :-(

    It do give a bit of perspective at the local politicians. There are worse examples.

    --
    Karma: Excellent (My Karma? I wish...:-( )
    1. Re:He, you Anglosaxons might have a point :-) by Phil246 · · Score: 2, Informative

      it comes from history primarily.

      England has -always- had a rivalry with france and to a lesser extent other european countries.
      this rivalry got transferred to america when it was colonised.
      It doesnt have any real basis , it just exists. Its in the blood so to speak.

    2. Re:He, you Anglosaxons might have a point :-) by Seumas · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I have always had the impression that, when in France, French people are typically rude and snotty toward Americans.

      However, all of the French people I've dealt with at work and otherwise (in person) have been extremely nice people. Then again, I've never found any group of people from any place in the world that, in general, struck me as stupid, stubborn, snobbish or anything else. There may have been an individual or two that did - but no more so than any general population.

      I think most people adhere to this stereotype of French people simply because it's what they hear on Fox News, talk radio and other random people - with no experience of their own.

      I would probably feel uncomfortable and out of place in France - but I have no doubt that I'd find the people themselves easy to deal with - just as I've found them easy to deal with when they visit my country.

    3. Re:He, you Anglosaxons might have a point :-) by Ohreally_factor · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Actually, I think the anti-French thing in the US comes mostly from the second half of the last century, mostly because of Charles de Gaulle (although Churchill, Roosevelt and Ike certainly had problems with him during WW2, but that stuff didn't come to light until later).

      Chirac to my (typically uninformed American) eye seems to be in the mold of de Gaulle, and I'd guess that part of his popularity is from him "standing up" to the US.

      England, otoh, does have a looooong history of conflict with France. The English version of the finger is two fingers held defiantly (with the palm inwards, as opposed to peace or victory, where the palm is outward), from the days when the French would cut off the fingers of any English longbow troops they captured.

      --
      It's not offtopic, dumbass. It's orthogonal.
    4. Re:He, you Anglosaxons might have a point :-) by coopseruantalon · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Chirac is not that popular. The only reason he is still president is to avoid corruption charges. Besides the people of France had him and Le Penn to choose from. Talk about the lesser of two evils. "Le Raciste ou la criminelle" Excuse my French :-) I can understand why Chirac says he thinks they have a lot in common, they are both criminals...

    5. Re:He, you Anglosaxons might have a point :-) by Ohreally_factor · · Score: 1

      If criminality was a basis for freindship, you'd think he'd be good buddies with Bush. I guess it's more like rival gang leaders, with tariffs instead of drive by shootings.

      --
      It's not offtopic, dumbass. It's orthogonal.
    6. Re:He, you Anglosaxons might have a point :-) by chk89 · · Score: 1

      Hey I'll have to put in my two cents on the French, and even go so far as to be specific with some anecdotal evidence about a trip that my family took to France when I was in high school.

      We arrived in Paris in a rental car, in the early afternoon. After walking around quite a bit of the downtown area there, with all the sight-seeing and marvelling and whatnot, we decided to go find a hotel to stay in. This was our last stop on a drive from Rome to London, with the last leg taken on a train through the Chunnel.

      Calling around from a payphone in a fairly residential district, we can find nothing. Everyone is full up, all throughout the city. My dad must have called 20 places and burned up lots of money just trying to find a room. Still calling, a man walks up to us and asks if we need help. He says that he lives right upstairs, and would we like to come and use his phone instead?

      Grateful for the help we went up with him and made some more calls to local hotels, motels, places outside of the city, places 50 miles from the city, everything was full. He told us it was some music fest weekend in Paris and that there would be no where to stay most likely on a Saturday night. Then he made the suggestion that we just stay in his living room.

      He and his wife lived in a very small one bedroom apartment, and here they were offering thier living room to three Americans who they had never met, and would most likely never see again. We took it gratefully and took them out to lunch the next day.

      I'll have to say that it is one of the best stories from travelling that I have, and I always have to bring it up when people are ragging on the French, going on about "freedom fries" and such nonsense.

      What perplexes me about this situation with Chirac/Google/M$ is hard to even explain. While Google seems to be trying to amass quite a monopoly of their own, it would seem that the logical conclusion, if one were trying to buck such a monopoly, would not be to go to the largest monopolistic company in the computer world. Wouldn't you make an effort to get smaller companies involved, maybe make up an agency that could coordinate the efforts of a whole bunch of places?

      In any case, it is one of those things that just seems ridiculous. Chirac doesn't want to be negotiating from a "weak position," yet he plans to find solace in M$? WTF? Call me skeptical, but I highly doubt they will find much fair play in that direction.

      Jason

    7. Re:He, you Anglosaxons might have a point :-) by dartmongrel · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Well the situation isn't improving in Canada, either. All kinds of fun new laws are happening here!:)
      I think that what we're seing is the gradual degradation of civilization; we are approaching a time of great change, the ultimate domination of humanity by a brainless corporate-style world governement. Business interests feed the channels of power (through money) in the world now. The gradual "dumbing down" of the mob/populace ensure the continuation of an upward feeding, parasitic capitalism.
      My vote's with the REVOLUTION!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    8. Re:He, you Anglosaxons might have a point :-) by Wiwi+Jumbo · · Score: 3, Informative

      I've come to know of it as the French of Paris are rude and snotty to everyone.

      2 first hand accounts, and 1 second hand.

      I know a French-Canadian girl who just *hates* the people of Paris. She just can't believe how people will talk to her when they hear her accent.

      I know a woman at work who is *from* France, but not Paris, and will tell you that Paris earns it's reputation when it comes to the "rude Frenchman".

      Also at work I've heard a few stories of French-Canadians going to see the "homeland" and are just left dissappointed with the reception they recieve.....

      Two years ago I spent 2 weeks in Paris and although I don't speak French (You should have seen me trying to get McDonald's to go... "Umm....'dans le sac'????") I never really had any trouble... tho I did find the younger people to be more willing (or maybe they just knew more English) to help me.

      --
      Wiwi
      "I trust in my abilities,
      but I want more then they offer"
    9. Re:He, you Anglosaxons might have a point :-) by waynelorentz · · Score: 1

      Actually, I think the anti-French thing in the US comes mostly from the second half of the last century, mostly because of Charles de Gaulle.

      You are absolutely correct. Alastair Cook(e?) did a whole segment of "Letter From America" on BBC World Service about this exact thing -- he explained how America learned to hate France. It was really fascinating stuff. Now I'm going to have to scour the BBC archive for it because I can't remember the details.

    10. Re:He, you Anglosaxons might have a point :-) by tyler_larson · · Score: 1
      I just learned today (from an unrelated conversation) that my Dad's uncle came back from fighting in WWII with a much lowered opinion of the French. "You'd think they had liberated us by the way they treated us. It was as if we owed them something."

      Amazingly, the German civilians he met were the some the most cordial around--"the enemy" seemed to put France to shame in the area of hosipitality.

      After it was all said and done, he'd come to the conclusion that perhaps we'd joined the wrong side.

      Sure, it's probably just that same nationalistic pride that's also so prevalent here. When living in other countries, I've frequently been embarassed by the arrogant idiocy of my fellow Americans ("Why doesn't anyone speak English in this country?!"). But when Americans are arrogant, it's excusable--they're from the most powerful country in the world. France, on the other hand; what has France contributed to the world that makes them so special?

      I was most way through elementary school before I could point out France on a map. Sure, I'd been told where it was, but France wasn't important enough to remember.

      On the other hand, I could name all 50 states by the time I was 8.

      --
      "With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine. However, this is not necessarily a good idea...."
      RFC 1925
    11. Re:He, you Anglosaxons might have a point :-) by ryanvanderzanden · · Score: 1

      Regarding your story about Paris, my wife and I had a very similar experience, twice, while there nearly 2 years go.

      We had arrived by train from Salzburg, Austria, and had made our way down to the Metro. After the 10hr train ride we were a bit 'out of it' and were standing in front of the ticket machine trying to figure out what to do. This older woman had come up to us, obviously seeing our confusion, and tried to explain how the system worked (our French is a little rusty but we were able to understand her faily well). At the end of her lesson on how to purchase Metro tickets, she proceeded to give us two tickets from her little packet and wished us a good day.

      Two days later we were (after a good week of travelling) in need of a laundromat. Finally finding one we were a bit confused as to which slot to stick in the detergent disks and such, and another very friendly helpful woman showed us how it all worked and helped us out.

      While speaking a little French probably helped, overall I found our experience very pleasant. We were only treated 'rudely' by stressed out shop owners or waiters at busy restaurants. And even then they were polite. Never once did I get the kind of treatment that I was so concerned about getting while I was there.

      And really, if you approach someone, in the US (where I live) or elsewhere, with respect and courtesy you will likely get the same in return. I have had only one 'bad' experience on my trips to various European countries and that was only because I wandered in, out of confusion, to a shop that was closed (the door was open) and didn't know what the heck was going on. Not speaking nearly enough of the language I didn't realize they were telling me to get out. :)

      -r-

    12. Re:He, you Anglosaxons might have a point :-) by MightyMartian · · Score: 1
      I think you're confusing French with Normans. If I were Norse I'd be insulted. The fact that the Normans conquered part of France before deciding they'd prefer Britain does not make them French.

      The Normans were not Norseman, but descendants of Norsemen. They spoke French, albeit a dialect which is still recognizable today. However, William the Conqueror did not bring over Viking civilization (which had been hanging around in England for some time anyways) but Continental language and traditions.

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    13. Re:He, you Anglosaxons might have a point :-) by Guppy06 · · Score: 1

      "I know a French-Canadian girl who just *hates* the people of Paris. She just can't believe how people will talk to her when they hear her accent."

      Wait a sec... they even hate Canadians? I mean, I can understand frowning upon Canadian Anglophones (if for no other reason than mistaking where they're from), but your friend speaks French fluently, natively, but in a way that pegs her as a Canadian and they don't like it?

      Yes, the US hates Canada, but that's because we're your neighbors and nobody can hate somebody like a neighbor (except maybe a family member), and it's mostly because we can't think of anything specific to hate you for. But the French hating on Canadians, and the Quebecois no less? I just can't wrap my head around that one.

      (It makes me wonder how the French feel about folks from, say, Saint-Pierre and Miquelon...)

      "Also at work I've heard a few stories of French-Canadians going to see the "homeland" and are just left dissappointed with the reception they recieve....."

      So... up a creek without a homeland?

    14. Re:He, you Anglosaxons might have a point :-) by swillden · · Score: 4, Insightful

      But when Americans are arrogant, it's excusable--they're from the most powerful country in the world. France, on the other hand; what has France contributed to the world that makes them so special?

      They were the most important country in the western world, for a good long time. They may not always have been the most powerful, but they were the cultural center of Europe. Even when the sun never set on the British Empire, cultured Britons studied French, sat on French furniture, drank French wine and generally revered all things French (except perhaps the French themselves).

      That sense of cultural superiority dies hard, probably because it is so comfortable to think of yourself as coming from a superior people. At least a part of current middle-eastern frustration arises from the fact that people there are accustomed to thinking of themselves as a powerful, influential culture -- which they were when the Europeans were arguably near savages. Chinese also have a long-standing sense of superiority, derived from thousands of years of civilization, that often puts them subtly (or not so subtly) at odds with the current young upstart superpower. Greeks tend to have a high opinion of the relative value of their culture based on the heights they reached 2-3000 years ago. I haven't really noticed the same effect among Italians; maybe they don't really think of themselves as the same people as the Romans? They're quite proud of their history, granted, but don't seem to draw any personal superiority from it. Maybe I just haven't met the right Italians :-)

      For that matter, I think that if we Americans honestly analyze our own position in the world, we have to conclude that we're in decline now, and not in as powerful a position as we pretend to be (though we're clearly in a pre-eminent position). It's just so nice to think of yourself as superior that in spite of both the silliness of the notion and the fact that it may not be true, people hold onto it.

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
    15. Re:He, you Anglosaxons might have a point :-) by Bill+Walker · · Score: 1
      The French are famous for being mean to the Quebecois. From what I've been told, it has to do with their obsession with the purity of their language. In their eyes, it's okay for a foreigner to speak with incorrect grammar, but provincial grammar is just unacceptable.

      Most French-canadians I've met will correct anyone who calls them French. I think people in the countryside, especialy Normandy, are pretty nice. Just know a enough french to make a polite effort.

      --
      Please, for the love of God, no more car analogies.
    16. Re:He, you Anglosaxons might have a point :-) by Ohreally_factor · · Score: 1

      I'm afraid snopes is not the be all and end all. They're most likely right about the "pluck you" part (which was a joke) and also you'll note that they're discussing the middle finger, i.e., the bird.

      If this is an urban legend, it goes back a lot farther than the Tappet brothers. The story was related to me in college by a history professor, and he wasn't pulling our legs.

      Come up with a better explanation, or some real research, for the english "reverse peace sign" fuck you gesture, and I'll consider it. Substantiation will aid your cause.

      --
      It's not offtopic, dumbass. It's orthogonal.
    17. Re:He, you Anglosaxons might have a point :-) by deaddrunk · · Score: 1

      I went to Paris a few years ago expecting people to be rude and arrogant and had exactly the opposite experience. The prices are outrageous though.

      --
      Does a Christian soccer team even need a goalkeeper?
    18. Re:He, you Anglosaxons might have a point :-) by Lars+T. · · Score: 1

      Wasn't there a poll some time ago where many American Slashdoters were proud of never having left the US?

      --

      Lars T.

      To the guy who modded me down from perfect to terrible Karma - Apple haters still suck

    19. Re:He, you Anglosaxons might have a point :-) by Kirth · · Score: 1

      I have always had the impression that, when in France, French people are typically rude and snotty toward Americans.
      Actually, they are -- to anyone who doesn't speak french. I'm pretty sure the french-speaking canadians get along with the french quite well.

      But if you're trying, just trying to speak french with them, they'll be quite friendly and helpful. It goes somewhere along the line of either "what the hell does that guy want? He comes to a foreign country and doesn't even try to speak our language?" or "ah, he is trying to speak french, he must be helped."

      Being swiss, I've got a lot to do with french people, they're our neighbours, so I think this impression is correct.

      --
      "The more prohibitions there are, The poorer the people will be" -- Lao Tse
    20. Re:He, you Anglosaxons might have a point :-) by 16K+Ram+Pack · · Score: 1

      My experience is that it's not even Paris, it's the most tourist infested areas of Paris. Head out a little from the sights and people are as normal and friendly as elsewhere.

    21. Re:He, you Anglosaxons might have a point :-) by Lars+T. · · Score: 1
      It was as if we owed them something.

      They helped you with that little revolution of yours.

      --

      Lars T.

      To the guy who modded me down from perfect to terrible Karma - Apple haters still suck

    22. Re:He, you Anglosaxons might have a point :-) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I couldn't believe how French-Canadians treated me when they heard my accent.

      They may like the French, but they certainly aren't anywhere near friendly to us foreigners who just happen to be fluent in the language. The moment they hear something that's neither French nor French-Canadian, out comes the bitch.

      OTOH, the French have always treated me very well, thanks.

      It's amazing how much more complex these things are than stereotypes give them credit for.

    23. Re:He, you Anglosaxons might have a point :-) by snilloc · · Score: 1
      My grandfather (WWII Navy Seabee) hates the French because they made us PAY per gravesite to bury our fallen in Normandy.

      I'm inclined to see that (possibly) as foreign aid, but there is something about it that tastes bad to me.

    24. Re:He, you Anglosaxons might have a point :-) by roard · · Score: 1

      The French are famous for being mean to the Quebecois ? what ? I am french, and frankly I think that most french people /love/ Quebec, and their fantastic accent (really!). Meeting a few assholes that treat you badly doesn't make a rule.

    25. Re:He, you Anglosaxons might have a point :-) by Secret+Agent+99 · · Score: 1

      Yes, amazing.

      I'm a mainly English-speaking Quebecer, and my French is "neither here nor there." Because of the way I learned it, it's an odd mix of accents and a high degree of fluency. No matter how close to "native speaker" my accent gets, anyone can tell it's "neither French nor French-Canadian."

      Guess what? I get along just fine with most francophones, be they Canadian or European. I don't know why our experiences are so different. Is it possible that your "fluency" isn't really as fluent as you think, and you were somehow inadvertently rude? (When speaking in a second language, the easiest thing in the world is to be inadvertently rude.)

      To say "all Quebecers are nasty to everyone who speaks French but isn't a native speaker" is an absurd stereotype that hardly captures any complexity at all.

      Some Quebecers are nasty with pretty much everyone, some can't abide an English-speaker's accent, some probably hate Germans, some think of French-from-France as weird exotic creatures. And some (I would say most) are very open-minded, and listen to the content of what you have to say, not your accent.

    26. Re:He, you Anglosaxons might have a point :-) by Cappy+Red · · Score: 1

      I don't know where the beginning of this particular wave of anti-franco sentiment started, but I know that almost from its inception, the U.S. has had a rocky relationship with France. Right around 1800, less than twenty years after the Treaty of Paris, the U.S. and France almost went to war(I think the declaration was defeated in Congress by one vote... but I'm not sure. You can find more information by looking up the XYZ Affair. Wikipedia also has a pretty good article on Franco-American relations... but I don't have time right now to look it up and link it)

      --
      This is my sig. It's prescription, I swear. I need it for reading things... on the other side of things
    27. Re:He, you Anglosaxons might have a point :-) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      That's my point - you can't go around saying "This culture sucks because [insert anecdote] but this one doesn't because [insert anecdote]".

      You can say "I had this experience and this experience".

      This does not mean that Culture A is dreadful and awful whereas Culture B is open and nice. It means you rubbed a couple of people from Culture A up the wrong way. Even if you never know why.

      Maybe it was the snow. Maybe they got out of bed on the wrong side. Maybe it was tax week.

      But generalising from that is pointless. Full stop.

      So calm down already.

    28. Re:He, you Anglosaxons might have a point :-) by Secret+Agent+99 · · Score: 1

      Go back to your original post: your point was the generalization that if you speak French fluently but with a non-Quebec, non-France accent, "they" get bitchy.

      I don't even know what that means. What's your accent? American, anglo-Canadian, English, Welsh, Haitian, Martiniquais, West African? How fluent are you, really? Pourrait-on continuer la discussion en français? All these variables and more can affect the reception you get...

      So, yes, generalizing is perilous. I will venture this, though: from my experience of living here, observing, and interacting I can think of few if any circumstances where not speaking French is preferable to speaking fluent, accented French.

    29. Re:He, you Anglosaxons might have a point :-) by Ohreally_factor · · Score: 1

      Interesting!

      XYZ Affair

      Quasi-War

      --
      It's not offtopic, dumbass. It's orthogonal.
    30. Re:He, you Anglosaxons might have a point :-) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Bien sur qu'on pourrait continuer en francais, sauf que ce clavier n'a pas d'accents et j'ai horreur des entites HTML. J'aurais du preciser que je suis de nationalite britannique, et que j'ai travaille en France pendant plusieurs annees. D'apres mon ami francais, mon accent "n'est pas francais, mais est loin d'etre l'accent anglais typique". On peut au moins dire que les francais arrivent a me comprendre sans probleme et n'arrivent pas toujours a deviner d'ou je viens.

      Donc, ca a ete avec surprise que j'ai remarque que plusiers quebecois (qui, il faut quand meme admettre, ont eux-memes un accent tres particulier) ont reagi a mon accent avec dedain. Vu que presque tous les francais que j'ai rencontre, y compris les parisiens, ont pu accepter mon accent tel quel, j'ai trouve cet attitude un peu... froid, et tres surprenant. Mais il ne faut pas le prendre personellement, et je le sais...

      D'ailleurs, mon ami francais a eu la meme experience durant son stage a Montreal. Bien qu'il soit Francais, ayant vecu en Angleterre pendant 5 ans, il a developpe un tres leger accent britannique. Cela ne passait pas inapercu et a plusieurs reprises, on lui a fait comprendre que les Anglais n'etaient pas les bienvenus. Dommage. mais bon... ce n'etait pas notre probleme.

      Il est evident que certains Francais ne sont pas pro-anglais. En revanche ils sont tres peu a ne pas apprecier lorsqu'un anglais, ou plus generalement un etranger, fait l'effort de parler leur langue. Ce n'etait pas mon experience au Quebec.

    31. Re:He, you Anglosaxons might have a point :-) by Ringlord · · Score: 1

      Look, this is Slashdot! You can't just go around being insightful here, you know! ;-)

    32. Re:He, you Anglosaxons might have a point :-) by dvdeug · · Score: 1

      I've never met anyone from France that was rude and refused to try to speak English -- quite the opposite.

      But I've meet a couple people who found that very rude. A Swede I met on the net found that the attendent insisted on speaking English, despite the fact that his French was much better than the attendent's English.* My father went all around Europe roughly communicating in the local language with Berlitz guides. In France, the first person he tried it with rolled his eyes and said "Just speak English". I've heard from several people, including my father, that France is one of the few places in the world that they don't appreciate you trying to communicate with them in their language, and it offends those who try and make the effort.

    33. Re:He, you Anglosaxons might have a point :-) by deaddrunk · · Score: 1

      I was paying with francs and converted to GBP amounted to £7 for half a litre of lager (approx 3 times UK prices)

      --
      Does a Christian soccer team even need a goalkeeper?
    34. Re:He, you Anglosaxons might have a point :-) by Secret+Agent+99 · · Score: 1

      On the off chance you're still reading: I find that fascinating and surprising. (Your French is great, better than mine, and though I could answer in French it would be too slow for me to do that.)

      The only hypothesis I have is that you were taken as being from France. In many (though far from all) circles in Quebec, someone from France is assumed to be a snob who will put on haughty airs, until proven otherwise.

      Of course, I have actually met French people living and working here who do have a disdainful attitude toward the Québécois and their way of speaking -- something which they sometimes confide to me because of my lack of a strong Québécois accent.

      As for the British, my observations have again been quite the opposite of your experience. From what I've seen, Brits who speak passable French and who work in the communication field will find doors opened to them solely because someone from Britain (especially England) is automatically assumed to have a superior command of written English.

      So I suppose the other variable worth mentioning is whom you're dealing with: someone beset with provincial attitudes and prejudices, or someone who leaves all that crap aside? I guess I'm just fortunate in that the vast majority of people I deal with simply don't bother with that kind of crap.

    35. Re:He, you Anglosaxons might have a point :-) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Ah well...

      there are no absolutes, apart from that there are no absolutes!...

      Maybe they did think I was French. I never did get rid of that dire Parisian habit of finishing every sentence with a throwaway sound of some kind (though fortunately I never picked up the awful thing where people end each phrase with 'quoi'). It seems unlikely... but who knows?

      Anyway, these things are - realistically - mostly luck. Or at any rate, so complex that they aren't otherwise predictable. Hopefully I'll be back in Quebec in a few years, and maybe it'll all be different. At the time, to be honest, I blamed it on the snow; it was that awkward period between winter and spring where you know spring is coming, but fear that it'll snow again first; so you spend your life wondering if you should be picking out your short-sleeve shirts or salting your stairs. Maybe next time I'll pick the summer, and find a different atmosphere.

      For the record, I like the Quebecois accent... I also like Quebec. I was merely a little taken aback by the reception I received, since for some totally obsecure reason, practically every French person I've had much to do with in the last ten years has been generally positive (if amused at my taste in wine, clothes, etc). I was used to the idea that my nationality could be grounds for amusement, but not that it could inspire hatred (naive or what?). It's luck (again), coupled with what one does or does not choose to register as an insult.

      As they say on Slashdot, YMMV :)

    36. Re:He, you Anglosaxons might have a point :-) by Secret+Agent+99 · · Score: 1

      At the time, to be honest, I blamed it on the snow; it was that awkward period between winter and spring where you know spring is coming, but fear that it'll snow again first; so you spend your life wondering if you should be picking out your short-sleeve shirts or salting your stairs.

      Oddly enough, Sunday was a gorgeous, sunny day, the second in a row but also only the second such day this year, and I was feeling a bit grumpy for being inside...and knowing that there's still time for a nice dump of icky wet snow.

      Indeed, everyone seems quite cranky at the end of winter. The office-bound insist that they NEED to go home, for sanity's sake, to stop looking at the same pasty faces and drab walls. The home-office-bound insist that they will go mad, absolutely mad, if they don't get out of the house NOW. Five solid months of snow, ice and darkness will do that to you, and more. Then the sun comes back and spends weeks melting the snow and revealing dog turds. Weeks, endless weeks go by before that damned sun can coax any greenery out of anything but an evergreen.

      Seems you may have run into a seasonal attitude a second time, this time online.

      So do come back at some other time of year, but I'd say skip the summer proper. The best months are May, June, September and October. But July and August: sticky heat and wall-to-wall festivals. (In Montreal, at any rate.) It that's your thing, great. If you're a weary local it's time to flee to the countryside...if you can afford it.

  59. Re:No-France is intent on its opinion of being Fre by nutznboltz · · Score: 1

    digitization of French language works will only hasten their translation to other languages

    Sacre bleu!

  60. Re:So how long before the invasion by LokieLizzy · · Score: 1
    "Grow up and drop the racist jokes .

    Err, when did the French become a race?

    --
    My digital rights don't need management.
  61. Re:Do you Americans know... by Whyte · · Score: 1

    Actually it's more basic than that. Osama wants to be "The" caliph of the Arabian Peninsula (he has openly stated so). However, he chose the U.S. as a target because he was under the notion (now discredited) that another military reaction my the U.S. in the Middle East would stir a popular uprising for "His" caliphate throughout the peninsula. He was hoping for a reaction similar to the Islamist power grab made in Iran.

    Unfortunately for Osama it turned out that in general Arabs want economic prosperity more than they want him as their caliph...just like everyone else on the planet. Go figure...

    It will be interesting to see how long Osama's campaign lasts after he bleeds to death all the students from the ideologically extreme madrassas on the peninsula.

    --
    -- No matter how great your triumphs or how tragic your defeats, approximately one billion Chinese couldn't care less.
  62. Re:now there's one more reason to hate france by WIAKywbfatw · · Score: 4, Insightful

    No wonder most Americans have such a distorted view of world history if this is how an American high school history teacher thinks.

    Seriously, in that one sentence you've demonstrated that you're so clueless about history that you're a danger in the classroom. I have to agree with the other poster that I'd be very worried if you were teaching my kids.

    --

    "Accept that some days you are the pigeon, and some days you are the statue." - David Brent, Wernham Hogg
  63. Re:Etats-Unians ... by spauldo · · Score: 1

    More like, "You know what would piss off the brits?"

    France had good reasons for helping out in the revolutionary war. It certainly wan't altruism.

    Think "French and Indian War" here.

    --
    Those who can't do, teach. Those who can't teach either, do tech support.
  64. Re:Do you Americans know... by NoMaster · · Score: 1

    No, this is what you've come to believe - either through propaganda, or through independent thought influenced by propaganda - in order to reconcile events with your own world view.

    It pays to remember that, no matter how nice you are, no matter how good you are, no matter how altruistic you are, there are enough different people and opinions in this world that it's almost certain that somebody, somewhere, will think you're a cunt.

    And face it - America's actions throughout the word for the last 50 years or much more have, on the whole, been less than nice, good, and altruistic.

    (And yes, I used the word "propaganda" most deliberately. Just because you agree with a statement doesn't mean it isn't propaganda...)

    --
    What part of "a well regulated militia" do you not understand?
  65. NO as said general Patton (or was it YES ?) by Coeurderoy · · Score: 5, Informative

    What happened up to now is that: The president of France said that he'd rather have his own "very large digital library" rather than let google do it all on their own. What some of his "minder" said in answer of a journalists question was: yes Microsoft could be a partner. Most probably if the journalist would have asked if Oracle, or Mysql or any other organisation/person/BEM the answer would have been more or less the same.

    The first issue being: Should the governement fund a public "digital library" The second issue being: How.

    So I do find it very unfortunate that people make a lot of "advertizement" for a mediocre propriaitary software provider (as in you can write good things or bad things about me, but first of all write about me !), based on partial information.

    For the record, I do like the google search engine, but I do think that any government should make the effort of putting as much as possible of cultural content as possible online.

    Of course I do hope that when the project will start it will use Free and Open Source Software, but for the time being there is not even a call for tender

    BTW the french national library is called "La tres grande bibliotheque"/"Bibliotheque François Mitterand", (socialist predecessor of Chirac) no wonder Jacques wants his own.

    For those actually interested in what is there http://gallica.bnf.fr/

  66. Farkers photoshop the "Les Mis" waif by Anomalyst · · Score: 1

    Oops, wrong web site ... still ... not not a bad idea, give it a shot.

    --
    There is no right to feel safe thru security vaudeville at the expense of everyone's freedom, privacy and tax money.
  67. Orangutangs and Maple Syrup! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    And the only reason other countries went and colonized it for them was because they wanted tobacco and maple syrup and apple pie and breakfast cereal and orangutangs and sanitation and medicine and aqueducts and peace...

    I guess they did a bit of a buggered up job on that last one, but the rest are pretty hot commodoties even today. So just thank your lucky stars you've got the U.S.A., else you might never get to take it easy with a big glass of maple syrup while getting wanked off by your orangutang. Jim just told me it's spelled 'orangutan.' Well, not in the United States it's not. There, it's spelled 'tang,' and bugger anyone who thinks differently.

  68. Dying super powers of the world unite! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    So the lumbering dinosaur that is the modern Microsoft may ally itself with a backwardly-minded socialist republic that is rapidly being taken over by foreign immigrants because their population refuses to breed.

    France is part of the past. Their role in the future will likely can be compared to the foodcourt in the mall except with a heavier emphasis on Middle Eastern cuisine. They're a dying nation who gave up their chance to be relevant when they started stumbling down the misguided road of nationalist socialism. The only thing France is known for anymore is a ramshackle economy, industrial goods no one else in the world would ever buy and opposing US imperialist foreign policy while simultaneously attempting to imperialistically control as much of EU and UN policy as is absolutely possible (and pissing on their own colonies for decades before finally losing them all).

    MS is falling behind technologically when compared to the rest of the industry. Their upcoming OS "update" is a hodgepodge collection of features and patches that should've made it into Windows 98. They're renowned for border-line illegal business tactics, shoddy engineering and the some of the most idiotic and backwards arguments ever heard in the debates over intellectual property rights.

    This is like the T-Rex and the Stegosaurus agreeing to unite in an effort to stop the meteor. It's downright comical.

    1. Re:Dying super powers of the world unite! by organum · · Score: 3, Interesting

      This is interesting because politically the U.S. is so much like Microsoft - a lumbering dinosaur of stasis that won't engage an evolving world. Instead, it looks to impose it's will by brute force and deceitful stratagems.

      From my travels in France, I've found the people to be as forward-thinking (and well-informed) politically as they are conformist and sycophantic technologically. Chirac's cluelessness doesn't suprise me in this regard.

      The French government has a reputation for opportunism when it come to matters such as peddling arms to all comers, but, at the same time, it's a government much more likely to be reigned in by an engaged populus -- as opposed to the U.S. where folks rely on pseudo news organizations such as Fox News.

      It's strange how France's romance for American culture has been contorted into a self-abasing worship of one America's largest coporate leech.

  69. France loves big business, by behemot · · Score: 1

    as well as state-sponsored monopolies and heavy handshaking between business and government. It is lamentable that for all their French pride they couldn't even find a single French company, however incomparable to Google, to mention.

  70. Re:No-France is intent on its opinion of being Fre by aussie_a · · Score: 1

    It is no big deal because digitization of French language works will only hasten their translation to other languages.I can't wait to see the translation of La Planète des Singes by babelfish!

  71. Re:Do you Americans know... by neil.pearce · · Score: 1

    FACT The Koran does not say such a thing, implicitly or explicitly.
    You quote the utterly warped views of a few insane "mullahs" to try and make some effect - and falsely generalise against 750m honest peaceful muslims.
    The bible "states" that PI is (exactly) "3 and one quarter". This is the same type of utterly ridiculous out-of-context quotation that the US media so loving reports.
    Ask yourslef WHY they report it, what's in it for them?

  72. Talking of common views... by Walkiry · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    I seem to recall that Chirac was on very friendly terms with Saddam Hussein, so having "views in common" with Billy seems like par for the course to me.

    --
    ---- Take the Space Quiz!
  73. Re:Fuck you, France... by Zakabog · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Posting as AC to preserve my karma from the hordes of French pussies who'd rather mod me down than step up and fight...

    So basically what you're saying is you're too much of a pussy to risk your karma because you're afraid someone might mod you down in disagreement?

    "Run to Bill, he'll protect us!" Now there's an idea. Jeeze, France, explain to us how your country has actually been relevant for 30 years...

    They're not running to Bill, when asked if they'd select Google's competitor, Microsoft, the president's advisor said "Why not?" Not "Yeah, we've already signed a contract", just "Why not?" if any other company was mentioned it would have had the same response.

  74. Microsoft Invades France by Orion+Blastar · · Score: 1

    Jacques Chirac surrenders to Bill Gates. Grants Microsoft access to build France's technology. Whole country suffers from massive BSOD, and Script Kiddies now control the government of France. :)

    --
    Remember, Slashdot does not have a -1 disagree moderation, and no, troll, flamebait, and overrated are not substitutes.
  75. we all knew this by rlds · · Score: 1
    Bill Gates gets along with the French very well.

    He has to.

    He married one, Melinda, her maiden name is French, of Microsoft Bob fame...

    1. Re:we all knew this by Stormwatch · · Score: 1

      People, hate Bill Gates as much as you want, but you have to respect him for this: he is a nerd who scored!

  76. You could say three other reasons. by Steven+Edwards · · Score: 1

    One could say we saved France three times as we have Indo-China(Vietnam) we could blame on them as well as WWI and WW2. There is that little favor they did for us in the Revolution so they can't all be bad but it is times like these when I think that maybe all the good Frenchmen were killed in the Nepoleonic wars and WW1/WW2. Most of the above comment is meant to be a joke but maybe you had better go read some history.

    --
    Why clone Unix when I can clone Windows instead. http://www.reactos.org
    1. Re:You could say three other reasons. by WIAKywbfatw · · Score: 2, Informative

      I can only assume that your history education was as flawed as that being received by the other poster's students.

      1. The US didn't save anyone in World War I. By the time the US got involved, the war was practically over. Also, the US got involved because of the threat of a war on its own soil - didn't you learn about the Zimmerman telegram at school? - and not because of any altruism it felt towards France.

      Without US intervention, France would still have been on the winning side.

      2. The US played a role in liberating Europe in World War II but it didn't save the day single-handedly. Again, the US got involved way after the party started, being the last of the combatants to join the war. And, again, that US involvement was for its own reasons - because Hitler had declared war on the US in the aftermath of the attack on Pearl Harbour - and not because of any altruism it felt towards France.

      Without US intervention, France would still have been on the winning side, only it would probably have been gifted with a communist government by Soviet liberators.

      3. The US involvement in Indo-China was a disaster. By the time that the US decided to involve itself, France had realised that its postition there was untenable. The US, however, once again decided to get involved for its own reasons - to stop the "domino effect" and the spread of communism in that part of the world - and not because of any altruism it felt towards France.

      Without US intervention, France's borders would still have been secure.

      Ask yourself this: In all three cases if the US really had French interests at heart then why didn't it help out its ally right away? Why did it always stand back and watch until it was practically dragged kicking and screaming into things?

      The men of the US armed forces did the peoples of Europe a great service once their nation finally entered WWII. But to pretend that they were sent to war for anything other than fighting a threat to their own country is the sort of revisionist crap that I expect from a Hollywood studio.

      --

      "Accept that some days you are the pigeon, and some days you are the statue." - David Brent, Wernham Hogg
    2. Re:You could say three other reasons. by Steven+Edwards · · Score: 1

      I never said the US had French interest at heart. In fact my comment was as I said meant as a joke however if you must 1. Yes I did read about the telegram but your comment about France still being on the winning side implies that victory would have happend without US help. 2. I get so sick of comments about the US being late to get involved in another World War, when if the French, English and Russians had stood ground in the first place the damn war would not have even had to happen. Of course you can overlook the invasion of Eastern Europe by Hitler and say "Why didn't the US step in sooner". What bullshit, it was not our job to protect Europe France and England handed Hitler everything he wanted on a silver plater. If you call Soviet liberators a ideal victory then I suggest you go live in China and run your mouth, have more than one kid or worship a God in anyway not state approved and you will have idea of what a Soviet France would have felt like. 3. Yes I can agree the US involvement in Indo-China was a disaster however the majority of the existing situation can be blamed on French colonialism. As for your final comment, Hitler could not even pull of a invasion of the UK and we knew it, try reading about operation Sea Lion. Comments like yours and your revisionist crap makes me glad that we are pulling more troops out of Europe.

      --
      Why clone Unix when I can clone Windows instead. http://www.reactos.org
    3. Re:You could say three other reasons. by A+beautiful+mind · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Sure. So it's all the fault of lefties...bah. Tree huggin' hippies, damn them all.

      Seriously, i'm really suprised how can you have a such ignorant world view. I could tell hours and hours for you about the US shipping weapons and supplies first both to nazi Germany and the british and french. Then because of basically the germans got cut off, the USA transferred goods mainly to Britain and France. Of course it got a bit dangerous because of german submarines, and also it would have sucked if all that investment would have been lost, so USA ignored the japan plans about Pearl Harbor, it gave them a perfect cause to join the war. They continued to ship weapons, goods to Britain and after the 'Allies' won the war, a nice american guy formulated the Daves plan, so that they could (the usa) get back their money invested. If you're so ignorant to pretend that this was about fighting against the evil or that sort of things, you're most certainly not objective enough to teach children. People should learn from history not to step into the same shite again, not turn it into a fairy tale.

      --
      It takes a man to suffer ignorance and smile
      Be yourself no matter what they say
    4. Re:You could say three other reasons. by northcat · · Score: 1

      Dude, English? I piss patterns in snow which are more coherent than that.

    5. Re:You could say three other reasons. by meringuoid · · Score: 1
      Ah, what was that? You would have won the war, but were stabbed in the back by internal opposition?...

      I seem to remember some weaselly Austrian Charlie Chaplin lookalike making a similar argument about how Germany managed to lose WW1. It was bullshit then, too. But of course it was effective at whipping up hatred against the people he blamed for said stab in the back, which was what he intended all along.

      --
      Real Daleks don't climb stairs - they level the building.
    6. Re:You could say three other reasons. by b17bmbr · · Score: 1

      that tin foil hat fitting a little too tight? you could go on for hours because some college professor went on for hours. big f-ing deal. we sold weapins to the nazis, let the japnese attack us, then formualted the daves (actually marshall) plan so we could recop our investment. i got a bridge in brooklyn i'm selling. you interested?

      --
      My problem? I was perfectly gruntled, until some numbnuts came by and dissed me.
    7. Re:You could say three other reasons. by pommiekiwifruit · · Score: 1
      Nobody has ever won a landwar against russia

      Um, Japan in the Meiji era?

    8. Re:You could say three other reasons. by daem0n1x · · Score: 1

      You won the Vietnam war? You live in an alternative reality, dude? Ever though about visiting a shrink?
      How can a fascist idiot like you be a History teacher? I'm glad you're thousands of kilometers away from me, I wouldn't want a jingo like you teaching my children.

    9. Re:You could say three other reasons. by Steven+Edwards · · Score: 1

      I never said we won the war. I said we got involved in it mainly because of French colonialism which if you had bothered to read the fucking comment rather than calling someone a fascist you might have picked up on.

      I am not the parent poster that claimed to be a history teacher either proving you not only unable to read but also to follow a threaded discussion.

      --
      Why clone Unix when I can clone Windows instead. http://www.reactos.org
    10. Re:You could say three other reasons. by daem0n1x · · Score: 1

      I didn't reply to you, dude. Who is unable to follow a thread, after all?

  77. Re:Do you Americans know... by Ohreally_factor · · Score: 2, Insightful

    You know what else is ironic? How closely his intermediate goals match up with the intermediate goals of the neocons. What the US is doing is certainly destabilizing the status quo in the Middle East, and loosening the grip of the House of Saud (albeit slowly). It's in the long term goals and of course the ideological differences that make Osama and the neocons imcompatible (and yet strangely complimentary*)

    *Would the neocons have been able to advance their agenda as far as they have without an Osama? I doubt it.

    --
    It's not offtopic, dumbass. It's orthogonal.
  78. Where there's smoke there's fire by SuperKendall · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The thing is that places do acquire reputations for a reason.

    I'm not saying everyone in France is rude, I'm saying that on average in France you are going to find more people who are seemingly rude (seemingly is key, more in a second) to you than perhaps if you travelled elsewhere.

    I have a few friends who have travelled to France (including outlying regions beyond paris) and the only one who enjoyed the experience is someone whose wife spoke fluent French.

    This effect is aggravated by the "seemingly rude" point - there are some things people do in other cultures that strike Americans as rude. Part of that for my friends was some sort of service issue at restaurants, I forget the detail but some seemingly inconsequential thing they wanted was looked on in outrage by the waiter. Perhaps he also viewed the request as rude, but the response basically discolored my friends opinion of restaurants in France.

    My own example along those lines is from a trip to Barcelona - myself and a few friends (two of which spoke Spanish pretty well) went into a toy store to browse. Now there was this cool thing in the window that I wanted to buy, so I took it from the display to take up to the cash register -well let me tell you the owner of the store flipped out! He was yelling and cursing at me like I had just set fire to his dog. Even after we explained calmly that I had not meant to offend he was incredibly angry and demanded we leave the store that instant! Well no toy is worth an altercation but to this day none of us can figure out what set him off to that degree. While it did not make me think of all Spaniards as lunatics, it certainly made me think a little bit inside that shopkeepers there were on something of a power trip with little respect for customers.

    So reputations of other countries being difficult may stem from the degree of cultural differences between two countries. And to some extent, I have to say that given that the reputation is correct as far as the average person goes. Even though the behavior there might not really be rude, to the traveller it might seem that way and really that's the same thing as far as the traveller is concerned!

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:Where there's smoke there's fire by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Of course they're rude to you. You are fucking animals without any culture beyond your pathetic "American Dream" and dollar worship. All europeans know that, but the french deserves recognition for treating you like the asswipes you are. Just read articles like this on Slashdot to get a good glance into the mind of the average American. A display of dangerously igorant and brainwashed minds.

      Ah.. glorious will be the day when I stand on a battlefield shoulder to shoulder with my european brothers from France, face to face with the dirtiest, most vile animal that has ever lived.. the American.

    2. Re:Where there's smoke there's fire by aralin · · Score: 2, Informative
      I can tell you what set off the shopkeeper. It would happen almost anywhere in europe and I think 100 years ago maybe even in US. But since you have all these faceless corporations like Toys'R'Us that don't care much and who's displays are the whole store, you might not understand this.

      In a small store, whatever is on display, is there to bring the customer in. Its not to be touched and many shopkeepers spend hours to arrange the things in the display. He probably had another piece just like this in the back of his store. If you would come to him and say you want that thing, he would bring it to you and if it would be the last one, he would (maybe) take it out of the display to sell you.

      By just taking it yourself, you have probably offended him, by being a foreigner, the reaction was multiplied. He probably cares more about his store, than he actually cares about the profit. And you have violated the decor of the store. Its very hard concept, especially for someone brought up in a consumer society, but just take it on my word, what you did is an extremly rude thing.

      Would you go in bar, ignore the bartender, pull a bottle from display a pour yourself a drink? I guess you would get thrown out of the bar by a bouncer even if you would be offering to pay for the drink.

      --
      If programs would be read like poetry, most programmers would be Vogons.
    3. Re:Where there's smoke there's fire by Tonytheloony · · Score: 1

      Well what you're saying is just anecdotal.
      You're just explaining the communication problem as rudeness.
      You do have a point on french service in many *parisian* restaurants. But if it can make you feel any better, the same rudeness is shown towards the locals.

      --
      The quickest way to become an atheist is to study the Bible thoroughly.
    4. Re:Where there's smoke there's fire by Lauwenmark · · Score: 4, Insightful


      The thing is that places do acquire reputations for a reason.


      The problem is that too often, the reputation is founded on false rumors and very limited experience. That's what - both in French and English - leads to Clichés: caricatural descriptions.


      I have a few friends who have travelled to France (including outlying regions beyond paris) and the only one who enjoyed the experience is someone whose wife spoke fluent French.


      First, it is harder to enjoy a trip in a foreign country when you don't speak its language. It may sound weird to you, but the vast majority of humans do not speak or even understand English. The French popular culture relies heavily on spoken language, so it is hard to enjoy it if you don't understand it.

      Moreover, there has been a strong Anti-Americanism sentiment in France (and more generally in Western Europe) since the start of the war in Iraq, mirroring the Anti-French sentiment in the US. It could have played a role in the bad experience as well.

      Finally, even French citizens recognize that some Parisians are maybe a little too proud of themselves - but that's not a problem specific to Paris or France and certainly cannot be generalized to all the Frenchs.


      This effect is aggravated by the "seemingly rude" point - there are some things people do in other cultures that strike Americans as rude. Part of that for my friends was some sort of service issue at restaurants, I forget the detail but some seemingly inconsequential thing they wanted was looked on in outrage by the waiter. Perhaps he also viewed the request as rude, but the response basically discolored my friends opinion of restaurants in France.


      When travelling to a foreign country, you have to accept its customs and habits. If you step on them, you'll definitely turn people angry or annoyed. If you make a mistake and offend somebody, apologizing solves it in most cases. Unfortunately, I have to admit that I didn't see a lot of american tourists caring much about the local behavior in restaurants, hotels or museums.


      (...)
      While it did not make me think of all Spaniards as lunatics, it certainly made me think a little bit inside that shopkeepers there were on something of a power trip with little respect for customers.


      Never *ever* touch the window display in a shop in Western Europe. That's a *major* mistake. For the shop keeper, it is about as offensive as taking a item exposed in a museum "to better see it" or to touch a XIVth century painting with your fingers "to check what kind of pigment it is". For him, that would be about the same if you threw a stone on his shop's display window.

      Your experience is definitely one of "cultural gap", not a "those people are unfriendly" one. Don't expect the shop keeper to have any respect for a customer who obviously had none for him !


      So reputations of other countries being difficult may stem from the degree of cultural differences between two countries. And to some extent, I have to say that given that the reputation is correct as far as the average person goes. Even though the behavior there might not really be rude, to the traveller it might seem that way and really that's the same thing as far as the traveller is concerned!


      I definitely disagree with your conclusion. *Everybody* in *every* foreign culture will be annoyed, offended or angry when you stomp on their customs. The vast majority of people (at least in Spain and France, which I know pretty well) are very friendly and will be open and helpful - as long as you don't behave as some kind of barbarian from their point of view.

      Before taking conclusions about the friendliness in foreign countries, always think about your own behavior first: did the inhabitants find it offensive ? Did you ask them first when you were uncertain on what was the proper thing to do ? Did you present apologises in the formal way used by the inhabitants ? In most cases, you'll find it very instructive and it will help you to enjoy your future trips much more than any "Those guys are unfriendly" kind of Cliché.

    5. Re:Where there's smoke there's fire by dvdeug · · Score: 1

      Your experience is definitely one of "cultural gap", not a "those people are unfriendly" one. Don't expect the shop keeper to have any respect for a customer who obviously had none for him !

      Customs and cultures are complex and confusing. Only a fool would assume that a foreigner had no respect for him because he violated some minor rule of etiquitte. It's always better to start from the assumption that no insult was intended and work to fix the problem and educate the erring person. This is all the more appropriate when you can't reasonably expect the other person to full understand the implications of their actions, like a child or a foreigner.

    6. Re:Where there's smoke there's fire by dvdeug · · Score: 1

      By just taking it yourself, you have probably offended him, by being a foreigner, the reaction was multiplied.

      For the reaction to be multiplied by the fact that he is a foreigner is sheer bigotry. The reaction as a whole was uncalled for; it was not a goal to cause offense, and in fact it was an honest mistake, and obviously so once apologies were offered.

      Would you go in bar, ignore the bartender, pull a bottle from display a pour yourself a drink? I guess you would get thrown out of the bar by a bouncer even if you would be offering to pay for the drink.

      Whereas I would expect that the bartender would be upset, but if you made clear that it was a mistake and you wouldn't do it again, you wouldn't have a problem.

      There's a reason why the Soup Nazi made good TV and poor real life.

    7. Re:Where there's smoke there's fire by aralin · · Score: 1
      For the reaction to be multiplied by the fact that he is a foreigner is sheer bigotry.

      Xenophobia is deeply ingrained in your genes, tribes of our species that lacked this vital feature were all slaughtered in prehistoric ages. We are just more or less trained to repress all actions resulting from it. Saying anything else, or calling someone names for it is a sheer hypocrisy. The only reason, why blacks and other ethnics are accepted in US, is because after a forced period, they already belong. They are part of the tribe and as such accepted. All I need to see the new target for american xenophobia is to read your reactions here on slashdot to H1b visa holders and outsourcing. So stop throwing around words like 'bigotry' and take a better look in the mirror.

      Whereas I would expect that the bartender would be upset, but if you made clear that it was a mistake and you wouldn't do it again, you wouldn't have a problem.

      Lets try, I will bet $100 to your $20 that you are not going to be able to talk yourself out of it. If its a real pub, you won't leave unbruised and if its a biker pub, you won't leave on your own feet.

      --
      If programs would be read like poetry, most programmers would be Vogons.
    8. Re:Where there's smoke there's fire by dvdeug · · Score: 1

      Xenophobia is deeply ingrained in your genes, tribes of our species that lacked this vital feature were all slaughtered in prehistoric ages. We are just more or less trained to repress all actions resulting from it. Saying anything else, or calling someone names for it is a sheer hypocrisy.

      If you act on your xenophobia, you're a bigot.

      According to this argument, the US has every right to bomb the hell out of any country it wants, for xenophobic reasons alone, and no one should call us names or say anything about it. Of course, they have the right to act on their xenophobia, so I guess they can call us names.

  79. Re:Fuck you, France... by cranos · · Score: 1

    Here's another dirty little secret. The US couldn't be fucked about Europe, or the plight of the jews and other minorities slaughtered by the Nazi regime until the Japanese severly embarrassed them at Pearl Harbour.

    Learn a little history, the French had their arses handed to them on a platter, the Germans had developed completely revolutionary battle tactics that would have pasted the US at the time in pretty much the same way they did the French and the BEF. Most of the country was occupied up until 1942 when Vichy France was finally overrun after the Vichy forces in North Africa surrendered.

    This idea that the French are the stereotypical "Cheese Eating Surrender Monkeys" is complete bullshit, sure they can be insufferably arrogant and for some reason they gave Jerry Lewis an award but unlike the US they have managed to survive two world wars being fought on their soil and still keep going.

  80. Well I'll offer up one. by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    Would you like pie with that sir?

    It's not very good but then it's better than anything else in this thread!

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:Well I'll offer up one. by ArsenneLupin · · Score: 1
      Would you like pie with that sir?

      Yes, a large cream pie would be fine.

      But isn't that a Belgian dish, rather than French?

  81. Here is an absolutely fantasic fact. Must read. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Did you know that when the U.S. entered WW2 in the European Theatre, the first military power we opposed was....

    Vichy France in North Africa.

    I am not making this up. Not Germany. Not Italy. France.

    And strangely enough, when the Americans finally beat the French, Petain perversely would *NOT* surrender because he had pledged support to Nazi Germany.

    This is all in "An Army At Dawn" by Rick Atkinson, which I found to be a compelling read.

    But gawdamn FRANCE was sticking by the Nazi's. To Fight Americans and British. Cripes. And then we saved their gaulic asses. I don't get it.

  82. Re:now there's one more reason to hate france by Stalyn · · Score: 1

    Are you American or did you go to private school? Because most public high school history professors think like this. Many of them being former military personale or have a conservative outlook. However some tend to be very radical but still extreme. Also the problem with Americans and so-called history has more to do with Americans then teachers. I remember in days in high school, people would fall asleep in class and get into fights. I often knew more then teachers. So don't ridicule this poor guy he probably works in some shitty school with crappy students. He's just a product of his culture.

    --
    The best education consists in immunizing people against systematic attempts at education. - Paul Feyerabend
  83. Re:Do you Americans know... by Whyte · · Score: 1

    There is a lot of truth to what you say. Both the U.S. and Osama wish to institute political change. Osama's actions did give the U.S. an excuse to impose change on the region. And you are right, it takes a unique set of events to garner the support needed of U.S. citizens for such a lengthy process.

    Both Osama and the U.S. also recognize that the current monarchies and autocracies are not providing as they should for their citizens.

    Of course the difference lies mainly in their proported aims for that change: the U.S. proports to desire an Arab Peninsula that is composed of democratic governments, but Osama wants a regional Islamic caliphate.

    I don't really think this is really any "neocon" agenda we see in motion. The means are definitely theirs, but the desire to see a repesentative government in the Middle East spans much farther than the Bush presidency (think post-WWI Geneva doctrine in regard to Lebanon, Algeria and Palestine). But as you said, the means the Bush Administration used would not have been possible without Osama's actions.

    --
    -- No matter how great your triumphs or how tragic your defeats, approximately one billion Chinese couldn't care less.
  84. Re:Etats-Unians ... by Col.+Bloodnok · · Score: 1

    Its not Like Etats-Unians really helped in WW1 or WW2 , they just came in at the end.

    First world war, perhaps/maybe/maybe-not.

    Second world war, no. France capituated when it was outclassed miitarily, as did most of continental Europe. Britain was starved of resources because of the U-Boat menace, plus the colonies were getting a kicking from the Japs in the pacific. We were in no fit state to help France, we barely fought the luftwaffe off as it was.

    You could have waited a few more years for the Russians to end the war, but then continental Europe would have become a greater part of the soviet union.

    You have the yanks to thank, mes amis.

  85. The really ironic thing is... by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    After all the documents are stored, they are going to have to beg Google for Google Desktop in order to search them.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  86. Huh? by Whyte · · Score: 1

    This is interesting because politically the U.S. is so much like Microsoft - a lumbering dinosaur of stasis that won't engage an evolving world. Instead, it looks to impose it's will by brute force and deceitful stratagems.

    Can you explain again how imposing "brute force and deceitful stratgems" is not an example of engaging the world?

    We can argue (or agree as the case may be) about the effectiveness of the response, but to say that the U.S. is not engaging the world seems senseless. I'd argue it is one of the few countries engaging the world.

    --
    -- No matter how great your triumphs or how tragic your defeats, approximately one billion Chinese couldn't care less.
    1. Re:Huh? by organum · · Score: 1

      Well, the sense in which I use the word 'engage' is a bit less two-dimensional than popular usage (military press briefings, for example, where even that second dimension is derided as unnecessarily complex.)

      Two definitions from the OED offer context:
      Engage (v. trans.)
      - To bind by a contract or formal promise.
      - To pledge oneself; to enter into a covenant or undertaking

      In this sense, 'engage' isn't simply a euphemism for attacking or bulldozing the proponents of a perceived threat. It has more to do with, first, investigating whether the threat is real, second, taking steps to understand the threat, and third, addressing any actual threat (or misunderstanding) in the context of facts.

      In this sense, one wouldn't say that the Chinese government "engaged" the protesters on Tiananmen Square when it ran them over with tanks, but that it ran them over with tanks because it saw no reason to engage them.

    2. Re:Huh? by Whyte · · Score: 1

      v. engaged, engaging, engages
      v. tr.
      To obtain or contract for the services of; employ: engage a carpenter.
      To arrange for the use of; reserve: engage a room. See Synonyms at book.
      To pledge or promise, especially to marry.
      To attract and hold the attention of; engross: a hobby that engaged her for hours at a time.
      To win over or attract: His smile engages everyone he meets.
      To draw into; involve: engage a shy person in conversation.
      To require the use of; occupy: Studying engages most of my time.
      To enter or bring into conflict with: We have engaged the enemy.
      To interlock or cause to interlock; mesh: engage the automobile's clutch.
      To give or take as security.

      v. intr.
      To involve oneself or become occupied; participate: engage in conversation.
      To assume an obligation; agree.
      To enter into conflict or battle: The armies engaged at dawn.
      To become meshed or interlocked: The gears engaged.


      Yes, maybe you could clarify your position then. Given the context of your paragraph it appeared that you were using the intranitive version of the verb.

      --
      -- No matter how great your triumphs or how tragic your defeats, approximately one billion Chinese couldn't care less.
    3. Re:Huh? by Whyte · · Score: 1

      Why are all the AC troll also members of the spelling police?

      --
      -- No matter how great your triumphs or how tragic your defeats, approximately one billion Chinese couldn't care less.
  87. Re:Here is an absolutely fantasic fact. Must read. by Ohreally_factor · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Yes, I know about Vichy France, which the U.S. originally recognized before we joined the hostilities. At that point we supported de Gaulle and the Free French, but never whole heartedly, because de Gaulle was such a pain in the ass (from the Anglo-American perspective).

    You might note that the Free French 19th Corps participated in Operation Torch. And it's been said that the fight was easier because many Vichy soldiers went over to the Free French side, rather than fight the Allies.

    Still, one of the funnier Churchill quotes is, "The heaviest cross I had to bear during the war was the Cross of Lorraine." The Cross of Lorraine was the symbol of Free France, and de Gaulle was Free France.

    --
    It's not offtopic, dumbass. It's orthogonal.
  88. Its not from the Koran actually... by Whyte · · Score: 1

    Actually the "kill infidels" part came way after the Koran was written. I can't remember the guys name (Deobandi I think), but it actually comes out of a sermon given in the 14th century not the Koran itself.

    "Jihad" actually similar to the infinitive "to struggle". But this Muslim preacher in the 14th century was arguing that it was the duty of every Muslim to restore an Islamist caliphate similar to the one Muhammad ruled. At the time this ment defeating the Turks, and he argued for a "violent" jihad.

    Today Osama bin Laden bases his ideology off of this same sermon. The goal is the same too. He want to restore an Islamist caliphate (ostensibly with him as the caliph).

    --
    -- No matter how great your triumphs or how tragic your defeats, approximately one billion Chinese couldn't care less.
  89. Re:F you, France... by LihTox · · Score: 1
    Jeeze, France, explain to us how your country has actually been relevant for 30 years...

    Oh I don't know, I imagine France has been rather relevant to its citizens and its neighbors. Not everyone feels this overwhelming need to control the world and everything in it.

    And just how relevant have you been in the past 30 years, anyway?

  90. Ayn Rand comes to mind by Stormwatch · · Score: 1

    This sounds a bit like something from Atlas Shrugged... government-owned State Science Institute is a money drain that never makes anything relevant; and all of a sudden, industrialist Hank Rearden invents a new, fantastic metal alloy. The Institute, of course, tries to destroy Rearden, or else people might realize what a waste of money it is.

    1. Re:Ayn Rand comes to mind by the+gnat · · Score: 2, Informative

      Isn't that from "The Fountainhead"?

      Anyway, there's a counterargument, although it's purely anecdotal: the NIH's PubMed system. It's an online index of most biomedical research published in the last 50 years. Probably the most essential web page for every biologist in the country, created solely by the US government.

      So this type of project isn't necessarily a bad idea. The major differences, of course, are that PubMed was probably created by scientists who knew exactly what they needed, and there's a huge incentive for journal publishers to have their content indexed. As a result, it's self-sustaining and I doubt it costs much to keep running. There are few government projects I can think of that have been such spectacular successes.

  91. Re:Do you Americans know... by Ohreally_factor · · Score: 1

    Well the public neocon agenda isn't a secret, and the unspoken agenda isn't difficult to miss. (Although one could argue that the not-so-secret agenda is due to the overlapping interests of the neocons and certain business interests.)

    Anyway, checck out that link, and look for stuff from before Bush was elected. It's more or less all laid out, and it becomes clear (as if it wasn't before) that the neocons were looking for any sort of pretext to invade Iraq; 9/11 was a godsend for them.

    --
    It's not offtopic, dumbass. It's orthogonal.
  92. Two obvious Microsoft questions spring to mind by leonbrooks · · Score: 1
    Jacques,
    1. How is Redmond, Washington-headquartered Microsoft any less American than Google?
    2. How is negotiating with Microsoft not a weaker bargaining position than negotiating with Google?
    Your mother had the brains of a hamster, and your father smelt... oh, never mind.
    --
    Got time? Spend some of it coding or testing
    1. Re:Two obvious Microsoft questions spring to mind by deaddrunk · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Jacques has a lot in common with Bill Gates. They're both corrupt and arrogant.

      --
      Does a Christian soccer team even need a goalkeeper?
  93. I think the quivalent would be... by leonbrooks · · Score: 1

    ...50x100mm RHS, in about 1500 length.

    An RSJ would have a much greater effect, but it's harder to wield accurately.

    --
    Got time? Spend some of it coding or testing
  94. Jack! by Phoinix · · Score: 1

    Managing major companies as M$ is not much different from running a country. Politics, business and money are intimately mixed in most situations. Look at the current president!

  95. Google is not that great. by Scallawag · · Score: 1

    If you really want to find stuff on the web, the fact that google favors paid advertisers gets you censored data.

    French are being smart, as much as Gates and the MSFT monopoly frustrates me, I hope they work it out and put things in perspective for google-mania.

    Frankly Yahoo.com has done everything I wanted for 6 years, until I found Slashdot.org, of course.

    --
    Getting old fast, Shit!
  96. Re:now there's one more reason to hate france by Stalyn · · Score: 1

    sorry i meant leftist...

    --
    The best education consists in immunizing people against systematic attempts at education. - Paul Feyerabend
  97. Seems to work on our side. by Ravachol · · Score: 1

    The Quebec's government have some big projects ongoing for our own Bibliotheque Nationale (National Library). They actually merged the old one with the Montreal's library, moving all major collections into a brand new building downtown and begun a big effort to digitalize a big chunk of the collections, if not all of them. In fact, I'm really impressed with the work done up to now and this is maybe one of the few project well managed here. And for the best, without any private partnership, an hot debate here !

    --
    Rav
  98. Re:Do you Americans know... by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

    They use Linux, yes. And "free" could mean "not Microsoft" in the metaphorical sense, where Microsoft becomes a symbol of everyone who wants to take away computing freedom...

    But yeah, sorry, I wasn't paying attention. I suppose I should have said "...chooses Microsoft over some non-evil company."

    --

    "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

  99. Obligatory Star Wars quote... by Anonymous+Writer · · Score: 1
    Master Obi-Wan, not victory. The shroud of the dark side has fallen. Begun, this Clone War has!
  100. Re:The irony: Mandrake to the rescue? by waferhead · · Score: 1

    OK, Mandrakesoft. Here's you chance to kick Bill in the nuts...

    I bet you could do it for a fraction of the cost as well.

    Do it for France. Do it for the World.

  101. Mountain out of a molehill anyone? by chuckw · · Score: 1

    Uhhh, is it just me or is France making a big deal out of nothing here?

    --
    *Condense fact from the vapor of nuance*
  102. Re:Here is an absolutely fantasic fact. Must read. by MightyMartian · · Score: 2, Informative

    The French government sided with the Nazis, and the French people didn't have a lot to say about it, with a foreign army parked on their territory. Certainly the French fought as they could. Ever heard of the Free French, which while lead by a royal pain in the ass, were as anti-Nazi as you could get. How about the French Resistance, which did a lot to make the German occupation a costly one for the Nazis. France had been screwed long before the war started, and its collapse was probably inevitible after the world stood by and let Hitler rearm the Rhineland.

    --
    The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
  103. Poor Chirac by Jormundgard · · Score: 1

    Chirac is such a businessman... quel dommage.

  104. Slackware by MoreDruid · · Score: 1
    Hell, it's not that they couldn't use a innovative French company to help them with this.

    I'm willing to bet that there are loads of Slack/Linux users eager to collaborate on such a project. If there could be some government funding on such a project this could really take off, creating new opportunities in the job market as well - benefitting the French economy even more while keeping everything "home-made".

    Oh well, I guess this will never happen. Slackware doesn't have wads of cash to wave to politicians so probably they're not even a blip on their clue-radar.
    --
    The best weapon of a dictatorship is secrecy, but the best weapon of a democracy should be the weapon of openness.
  105. Re:Here is an absolutely fantasic fact. Must read. by Ohreally_factor · · Score: 1

    Actually there were two main subgroups of the FR. One was more careful, and was more interested in intelligence gathering, while the other, which was mostly French Communists, were doing the sabotage and assassinations. The first group didn't like the Communists, because they made the espionage that much more difficult and brought down the heat.

    Also, compared to the partisans in Yugoslavia or the behind-enemy-lines guerillas in Russia, the FR really wasn't that effective overall, at least not until right before D-Day.

    --
    It's not offtopic, dumbass. It's orthogonal.
  106. Re:Do you Americans know... by Tonytheloony · · Score: 1

    I find it sad that your feelings towards the french are only "neutral". France is and has always been a US ally, and one of the closest (remember that 9/11 event? Guess which president was the first to go to New York?).
    ...their nationlistic zeal to keep France French.
    As an example of why I feel people are unfaire towards France : When we ask that products we buy at the supermarket actually be labeled in *french* we are called xenophobic and anti-english. You do understand most of this country doesn't speak english that well? Imagine having to do your groceries with everything labeled in russian?

    --
    The quickest way to become an atheist is to study the Bible thoroughly.
  107. Translation Error by Lauwenmark · · Score: 5, Informative

    The translation isn't correct for the first paragraph. That's quite a problem, since it changes the meaning significantly.

    Le président serait-il prêt à s'entretenir avec le concurrent de Google, Microsoft, puisqu'il a tant de convergences de vues avec son président, Bill Gates, qu'il a longuement reçu à l'Elysée? "Pourquoi pas?", répondent les conseillers de M. Chirac.

    The initial translator wrote "Would the president be ready to make a deal with Google's competitor, Microsoft" which is incorrect.

    A correct translation would be:

    Would the president be ready to talk with Google's competitor, Microsoft, since he has so many views in common with its president, Bill Gates, whom he has long welcomed to the Elysée?

    Quite a different meaning, don't you think ?

  108. Re:Do you Americans know... by flabbergast · · Score: 1

    When I say "neutral" I mean neither hostile nor happiness towards that particular country. This has more to do with ignorance on my own part than anything else. How can I truly appreciate something that I don't know anything about? So they are an ally. So is Australia. Does that mean I have to love Australia? No. I feel neutral about Australia as well.

    I think you just assumed that I was anti-French from the get go, and I'm sorry to say that's just you reading into it more than there is. It really feels like you're simply trying to pick a fight here. There's no animosity on my part towards the French embracing their heritage. You simply *assumed* that "nationalistic zeal" has bad connotations. It doesn't have to, I don't mean it in a negative way. Its a perfect description of things like excising Anglicanized words from their vocabulary. Or trying to get muslim women not to wear burqas. Did I call them xenophobic? No. Did I call them anti-English? No. I realize you're trying to defend the French, but attacking my post is the wrong place to begin. I simply pointed out the incongruity of their situation, which wasn't an attack, just a comment on the situation.

  109. Re:now there's one more reason to hate france by A+beautiful+mind · · Score: 1

    you're not from texas by any chance are you? :)

    --
    It takes a man to suffer ignorance and smile
    Be yourself no matter what they say
  110. Re:Etats-Unians ... by Lars+T. · · Score: 1

    The US had good reasons for helping out in World War II. It certainly wan't altruism. It was that Germany declared war on them.

    --

    Lars T.

    To the guy who modded me down from perfect to terrible Karma - Apple haters still suck

  111. Ken-by-ten? Has to be asked... by CarpetShark · · Score: 1

    That would be a ken-by-ten But what about Barbie, and all my other action figures? ;)

  112. MOD PARENT UP by Jules+Labrie · · Score: 1

    I'm French. And I CAN tell you, people who live in Paris are NOT normal french ! They're much more inpolite, and believe they are the center of the world.Repulsing, mainly for the others French !!!

    But to make something clear : It's not because a lot of French people can READ english that they can actually understand SPOKEN english (and, much more difficult, american !!!). So, if you're american, don't be angry if they have problems to speak with you or look at you in a strange way. Don't get fooled by the charmant accent of the waitress ; she's just very bad in english, and if her accent sounds very nice to you, it's not important how good your english is, she will not understand it anyway unless you have a very good frenchy accent...

    The cause to that could be that, at school, we only learn to write and read, and so little to speak and understand ! There is absolutely NO phonology in the english school's courses !! I did heard for the first time of phonology of english at the university... After 5 years of learning english.

    And finally, take distance with what french say to you. There a lot of dumb french people, you will sure meet one of them in a travel to France. But the people are simply very frankly, they say and show you what they think. Even the negative. But when it's positive, it's really positive ; this a different culture, like Asia or Africa. Take it as it is.

  113. Re:Before creation and Independance. by Ohreally_factor · · Score: 1

    The President of France at the time whas : Paul Reynaud.

    That's totally wrong. Reynaud was the French Prime Minister!

    I never realized that the French education system was as good (if not better) than the US education system. =)

    --
    It's not offtopic, dumbass. It's orthogonal.
  114. Slashdot FUD by totatis · · Score: 4, Informative

    As usual, the Slashdot headline is pure FUD.

    Here is the snippet from Le Monde's article : Dans l'esprit du chef de l'Etat, il s'agit de bâtir un "alter ego" au projet américain, avant d'envisager une éventuelle collaboration avec Google, pour ne pas discuter en situation de faiblesse. Le président serait-il prêt à s'entretenir avec le concurrent de Google, Microsoft, puisqu'il a tant de convergences de vues avec son président, Bill Gates, qu'il a longuement reçu à l'Elysée ? "Pourquoi pas ?", répondent les conseillers de M. Chirac.

    Translation : "In Chirac's mind, the idea is to build an "alter-ego" to the American project, before thinking about a collaboration with Google, to have a good position in negociations. Would the president be ready to talk with Microsoft, since he has many common ideas with Bill Gates, whom he has met at the Elysée ? "Why not ?" is the answer from Chirac's advisors."

    In summary, Chirac wants to build a French language online library, to have a good collaborative work with google. Should that work be done with Microsoft ? Maybe yes, maybe not. But the stated goal is to work with google, whatever that goal that can be achieved with Microsoft or not.

    If you need to work with Oracle, what do you do ? You call an MS sales man to leverage your negociations with Oracle. Well, France wants to work with Google, so it doesn't forbid itself from working with Microsoft, if that gives it a better negociations position.

    Slashdot has become more and more a FUD machine, with more or less every headline in contradiction with linked article. Worse, since the actual content of the article is from Le Monde, and is in French, many non-French speaking readers won't be able to see the utter non-sense that the Slashdot article is. This is more and more becoming the Fox News for Nerds, and it's starting to seriously upset me.

  115. Re:now there's one more reason to hate france by pommiekiwifruit · · Score: 1
    Support of terrorism?

    Shit, they gave a medal to the terrorist Alain Mafart (Knight of the Order of Merit) and a parade for Dominic Prieur.

    That was the government actually ordering terrorism, leading to actual convictions.

    So yeah, the French state supported terrorism.

  116. Re:The Customer Is Always Right by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

    It's hard to argue with their success. It's not like people don't have other choices at where to shop (Target, Kmart, etc.).

    The parent does make a good point, though. A better shopkeeper would not worry about his customs and conventions, and would service his customers. Honestly, it should be pretty easy to see if someone is from another culture and doesn't understand your local customs. As long as they're trying to pay you for something instead of steal it, what's the problem?

    Unfortunately, this isn't a problem just in Europe: lots of stores in America are also plagued by horrible customer service. It's probably one of the reasons the faceless, soulless big-box stores are doing so well: while they're not wonderful, you can always expect consistency at them. They usually have extremely generous return policies, good prices (not great), and a wide selection. With small shops, you don't know what kind of experience you'll get until you've been there a few times. Some shops are great, other really suck.

  117. Re:That's why its a 3rd world country by hkmwbz · · Score: 1
    "the customer is always right"
    Of course he isn't. The customer isn't right if he's wrong. This saying pisses me off sometimes, because it makes people think that they can will something to be true, even if it's false. Just because I'm a customer doesn't mean that I can smash up the store and say "I didn't do that". I did do that, and me being a customer doesn't change that fact.
    "The whole reason the U.S. became a dominant power...why Japan become a dominant power...why Britan became a dominant power is because they adapted rules that made more sense and dropped the ones that didn't."
    Right. "The murderer had a glass of water before he killed his victim. Therefore, the water caused the murder." Or "Americans speak American-English, and America is a super power. Therefore, anyone who doesn't speam American-English will not be a super power."

    Just because you make an observation about a difference in something doesn't mean that this particular difference is relevant in all contexts.

    --
    Clever signature text goes here.
  118. Re:The Customer Is Always Right by arkhan_jg · · Score: 1

    The problem with 'the customer is always right' is that culture is always a factor. You just don't see it in your own culture. Say in a US store, you let your dog crap on the floor. Would the shop keeper get upset? After all, the customer is always right, and if the customer wants it, they should get it. Somehow, I think you'd get yelled at and thrown out.

    Now let's assume the customer is from a (hypothetical) foreign culture where dogs are revered and allowed to do what they want, where they want, so to him, he's done nothing wrong. He'd go home and tell tales about how US shopkeepers are so unfriendly and insensitive.

    Just because something is not offensive in your country, you shouldn't assume that when you've pissed someone off it's because they're unfriendly and crap at customer service. They just may expect different rules of behaviour than you.

    --
    Remember kids, it's all fun and games until someone commits wholesale galactic genocide.
  119. Don't consider this an argument either way... by Cappy+Red · · Score: 1

    but in that last paragraph, you forgot the word "beleagured." Furthermore, I think you misspelled "Apple," as "America." Use the preview button next time, for crying out loud. >;)

    --
    This is my sig. It's prescription, I swear. I need it for reading things... on the other side of things
  120. tut by mattyrobinson69 · · Score: 1

    i dont trust anybody that drives on the wrong (right hand) side of the road

  121. Somebody call Chirac... by WhiskerTheMad · · Score: 1

    France just crashed.

    Needs a reboot.

    --
    Love your country always, but respect your government only when it deserves it. -- Mark Twain
  122. Re:Before creation and Independance. by Ohreally_factor · · Score: 1

    In my case its American Education I am a Canadian ...

    Did you hear the joke about the American moron that ran away from home?

    He was found years later, teaching school in Toronto.

    --
    It's not offtopic, dumbass. It's orthogonal.
  123. But a clear antitrust violation by hawk · · Score: 1

    While many don't notice, the *real* reason that Americans make fun of the French, and everyone mocks Microsoft, is that it's *easy*--they do all the work for us, and we need only repeat what they said.

    However, at the moment France has 52% and Microsoft 45% of the "saying things so stupid that we get mocked just by people repeating it" market. This combination would put a whopping 97% of this market in the same hands!

    Obviously, this merger *mut* be stopped, or we'll have to get some work done! (Either that, or we could write or own material . . .0

    hawk

  124. must . . . resist . . . by hawk · · Score: 1

    rats. I can't. :)

    Then how do you explain that sports where french have been traditionally quite good are fencing, judo, karate, rugby etc.

    Gosh, this is too easy . . .

    You can't *surrender* in any of those sports!

    Note that boxing and chess aren't on the list . . .

    hawk, who should know better

    1. Re:must . . . resist . . . by witte · · Score: 1

      > You can't *surrender* in any of those sports!

      Nice try, but incorrect.

      Warning; Rant :

      TBH, bashing the French is getting quite old.
      Consider joking about coloured people to the same extent the French have been dragged through the mud, and what reaction you can expect for that. I honestly don't see the difference.

      The French may be many things, but they are certainly not cowards. /rant off

  125. Re:That's why its a 3rd world country by aralin · · Score: 1
    You don't understand the basic concept here. And no wonder, you have never faced it. The shopkeeper will likely give you way better service returning the items, they take pride in personal service, in knowing their customers, in knowing their kids by name and age, you as a one-time customer are not so important to him. Even so, he will give you better service than a chain store. He likely knows every toy in the store much better than any clerk in Toys'R'Us ever will and can give you a good advice.

    But the important part is that profit is not what drives him. That allows him to stay in business and do what he likes. As soon as there is some profit and he can do what he likes and feed his family, there is no need for more. If he sells toys, its likely because he likes to sell toys.

    If this would be in US, the shopkeeper would likely try to make as much profit as possible converting his store in some high margin wares and use the profits to enjoy his hobby outside the work, for which he would not have time left anyway, because of the need to make a lot of profit.

    Some people prefer to rather enjoy their life than maximize their productivity in order to drive higher GDP. From my observations, they largely do not live in US or Japan.

    --
    If programs would be read like poetry, most programmers would be Vogons.
  126. Re:The Customer Is Always Right by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

    The problem with 'the customer is always right' is that culture is always a factor. You just don't see it in your own culture. Say in a US store, you let your dog crap on the floor. Would the shop keeper get upset? After all, the customer is always right, and if the customer wants it, they should get it. Somehow, I think you'd get yelled at and thrown out.

    Actually, if you did this in a typical big-box store, no one would even notice. However, this is assuming dogs were allowed inside at all, which they're not unless you're blind.

    However, I do think there's a big difference between dogs crapping on the floor and taking a display item out of a window with the intention of purchasing it. Any reasonable customer service person knows that losing your temper is never a good thing in customer service, no matter what someone has done. If they've done something annoying, you calmly tell them this isn't allowed. If they've done something really bad, you either ask them to leave the store, or inform them you're calling security/police.

    We have people from all different cultures regularly shopping at stores here in the US, especially in metro areas: Americans, Canadians, Mexicans, Indians, etc. Indians are especially funny: I've heard stories of them (usually relatives visiting here for the first time) trying to bargain for vegetables at supermarkets, because they didn't understand that we don't typically bargain for anything here. I've never heard of shopkeepers yelling at customers and throwing them out because they made some silly cultural faux pas.

    I'd like to mention here that any adult should know that losing your temper is almost never acceptable, no matter what the circumstance. People who have problems controlling their temper after the age of 18 should be on medication. Throwing hissy-fits is normal for little kids, but most of us grow out of this by the time we're adults: this is part of learning to not act like animals, and be a part of society. So as far as I'm concerned, the shopkeeper in this particular anecdote really had no business being a shopkeeper; if this is actually normal in that country, then I think it'd be a fair generalization to call people in that country assholes.

  127. Point to you... by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    And a case of bad memory for me!

    Still, at least it was close...

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  128. Thank you by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    In a small store, whatever is on display, is there to bring the customer in. Its not to be touched and many shopkeepers spend hours to arrange the things in the display. He probably had another piece just like this in the back of his store. If you would come to him and say you want that thing, he would bring it to you and if it would be the last one, he would (maybe) take it out of the display to sell you.

    Thank you for a civil response that I found really informative. I consider myself mindful of cultural traditions in other places, but I simply had never heard of anything like that or had any issues to other places in Europe.

    I still found it really odd that he would not consider the fact that we were foreigners, and cut us a little slack - but like you say I probably really offended him.

    It is true I would not go into a bar and take a drink from behind the bar. But here we are talking about a box you can se in the window, easily accessible from near the front door and on a stack of other boxes of the same type. In short I was fooled into thinking it was a stack of toys like any other you might see at ToysRUs, and my shopping instinct of not trying to bother any of the workers in the store took over. Frankly, I thought I was being helpful not making him go all the way back to the door and get it when I was already there!

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  129. Ironically you are more right than you know by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    Yeah, and you've just shown us how Americans have gotten their reputation.

    Aha, but ironically it also shows THAT reputation is perhaps as undeserved as the one about French people!

    My intentions were good and as I said I apologized porfusley when I realized he was upset, I really did not mean any harm or disrespect at all. I am actually really careful when I travel overseas and generally get along with others quite well. This was the only instance really where I have ever had an issue with anyone, as generally if you show a lot of respect and friendly openeess to people they will treat you kindly regardless of what language you speak or where you come from. That is why it was so baffling to me, because from my perspective I was helping him out by carrying this large box from the front (where I already was) to where he was. I mean, would you normally be standing right by a box and tell someone to cross the room to pick it up for you? I don't know about you but I have no Manservent Jeeves to order about, nor do I want one.

    So basically a lot of Americans may mean well but simply offend through cultural ignorance, which is hard when you are travelling the first time (that was my first time in Spain but not Europe). And I don't think you would argue that Americans should never travel! Indeed they could stand to travel abroad quite a bit more. Then I think some of the cultural assumptions would fade away a bit.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  130. Part of that is somewhat unfair by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    First, it is harder to enjoy a trip in a foreign country when you don't speak its language. It may sound weird to you, but the vast majority of humans do not speak or even understand English. The French popular culture relies heavily on spoken language, so it is hard to enjoy it if you don't understand it.

    I think that part was a bit of dig that was undeserved. As I said my friends with me spoke spanish (I'm afraid I am limited to a tiny bit of German and some unrehersed Japanese). So no I do not find that wierd, and indeed it's a bit of a result you expect. But even my fluently speaking friends run into wierd things sometimes that are simply cultural divide issues, where even if you speak the language you simply cannot understand why someone would do what they are doing, especially when evrything you know is telling you it's rude.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  131. Re:Americans by Floaty_Spice · · Score: 1

    Go on then. Fuck off. Withdraw all your troops from where they're not wanted. Ban your fucking annoying citizens from leaving America. We won't miss you. No more fucking American tourists. Woohoo! Party Time!.
    If you are exposed to that many American tourists then your area is probably quite dependent on the tourist dollar. Withdraw the American tourist dollar and you'll be back to castrating goats and selling pickled testicles to the local miners for a living.

    Tell me one thing that America produces that we need to live. We don't need Hollywood. Films are made in New Zealand, in England, in India.
    Interesting. So America doesn't produce anything you need to live and the example you cite is the movies they make. If that's what you need to live you're probably a rich fat pig who gobbles as much crap as Hollywood can slop into your trough.

    We'll never have to see another Hollywood film that shows the fucking dumbass yanks in the USAF trashing yet another country where they don't belong. None of this "America saves the world from yet another unlikely disaster".
    You didn't have to see them in the first place. You chose to see them and paid to see them, like the capitalist dog you are LOL!!!

    Take your films, take your advertising, take your fat fucking asses. Take your disgusting pretend-beer. Take your fucking lame TV-shows. Take your pro-life abortion campaigns, and your prudish attitude to anything sexual or arousing. Take your sick violence-worshiping culture. Take your fucking insane fire-arms policy. And for God's sweet sake take your fucking Pledge of fucking allegiance.
    All other things you have a personal right to disagree with but it's interesting you have a problem with the Pledge of Allegiance. Why would citizens promising loyalty to their home country be a problem for you? That's not a hypothetical question, why is it a problem? I'm waiting for an answer as I'm stumped what you could find offensive in the Pledge of Allegiance.

    The rest of the world doesn't want you.
    You should try just talking for yourself. The rest of the world is not also babbling like a hepped up glue sniffing wino so please don't speak for them...

    You're a joke. You smell. You eat too much. You talk too loudly.
    Sensitive little fellow aren't you? This kind of baseless vitriol works best on uneducated, disaffected people with nothing to lose. This tired old waffle doesn't get much traction on Slashdot where the average IQ is higher than the average shoe size.

    You have opinions that are fucking offensive to the rest of the world.
    Once again, I live in the rest of the world and a frothy mouthed lunatic like you certainly doesn't speak for me.

    You've got the highest incarceration rate per capita than any other country
    Fortunately, unlike many primitive countries, US prisoners are incarcerated because they broke laws, not offended powerful people.

    You have a death penalty.
    OK, that narrows it down. Pompous, hateful bag of wind and your home country has no death penalty.... who is John Howard?

    Corporate scum rule your country and decide your policies.
    Not quite true. Corporate scum heavly influence those who decide policies, as opposed to religious scum heavily influencing policy decision around most of the rest of the world.

    You are proud to be headed by a man who would have trouble finding his own arse with both hands.
    OK, less than 50% of America were proud on election day, probably less today. Latest reports are that George is quite good at finding it with both hands now, it's only single-handedly he's having troubles.... so give him a break... he's trying...

    You don't understand sarcasm.
    You can't be serious. Have you ever watched "Everybody Loves Raymond"??