Slashdot Mirror


Sony to Make an "iTunes for Movies"

dAzED1 writes "After years of complaining that the RIAA and MPAA were missing the boat, and should have embraced things like Napster instead of supressing them, we got iTunes and the like. Now, Sony has announced it will 'make its top 500 films available digitally in the next year' according to a report on the BBC, with Sony's iPod replacement being the PSP."

34 of 326 comments (clear)

  1. Shouldn't they just call them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    Walkmovies, since they already have the Walk-thing down?

    1. Re:Shouldn't they just call them by SFalcon · · Score: 4, Funny

      Sure, then Sony will be slapped with lawsuits after hundreds walk into oncoming traffic while watching a movie.

  2. PSP an iPod replacement? HAH! by kryogen1x · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Not with the expensive memory stick duos or w/o a umd burner it won't.

    1. Re:PSP an iPod replacement? HAH! by Torgo's+Pizza · · Score: 3, Funny

      At that point, why don't you just get a portable DVD player which can play movies from *any* movie studio? Let's face it... no one is going to watch movies on their PSP unless it's pr0n. Then all that's going to lead to is sticky buttons.

  3. Assinine? by slashdot4ever · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I can just see this being as successful as their minidisc players cripled with DRM. They will come out with it sure, but someone will come latter and release a better version not near as gay (Apple maybe?) like the ipod when compared to the ultracool now dead minidisc. Kevin

    1. Re:Assinine? by nunchux · · Score: 5, Funny

      someone will come latter and release a better version not near as gay (Apple maybe?)

      Two things come to mind from this post...

      First: In the future, Kevin, I'd suggest using another word in place of "gay." I'm not saying Slashdot posts should adhere to the rules of political correctness or accusing you of homophobia, but it is both juvenile and mildly derogatory to use the word in that matter.

      Second: I can't believe an Apple product is actually being used an example of something "less gay."

  4. meh, mainstream Hollywood by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    always 10 years behind the porn industry

  5. A good fit by timeOday · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I doubt movies formatted for the little PSP with it's 480x272 screen would be popular targets for piracy. Especially when the movies are already released as DVD's which are presumably much higher quality and easy to rip.

  6. Great Idea if they "Get It" by rokzy · · Score: 4, Insightful

    some quick clues to get you started:

    1. Apple's AACs don't *need* an iPod to work
    2. don't make the download more expensive than just clicking on Amazon next-day delivery
    3. don't only make new films available to download 6 months after general availability

    1. Re:Great Idea if they "Get It" by bechthros · · Score: 4, Informative

      "Apple's AACs don't *need* an iPod to work"

      That's because AAC is a product of Dolby, Apple just licensed it.

  7. Re:Prices? by jm92956n · · Score: 4, Insightful
    More importantly, will they burden it with an excessively draconian DRM policy? iTunes has been successful mostly because of its (in the opinion of others) liberal DRM.

    If Sony locks their movies down as tight as possible, this service will be dead before it hits the water.

    --
    An effective signature identifies a particular user amongst a base of thousands.
  8. PSP SP? by Jozer99 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Maybe eventually they will come out with a more entertainment-centric PSP, with a hard drive for storing movies instead of dinky and expensive Memory Sticks. They did it with that limited edition DVR PS2. On the other hand, Sony has a 10 year history of making very stupid decisions...

    1. Re:PSP SP? by Jozer99 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It would get cheaper and bigger, if Memory Stick was not a propriatary format that is only manufactured by Sony and a few other companies. This monopoly makes it so that Sony doesn't have to compete by offering larger cards. That is why Sony Memory Sticks enjoy almost no market share, outside of Technophobes who purchase Sony Cameras not realizing that they will be extorted for storage. Apple has not "moved" from hard drives to flash. They now have two flash based iPods, and six hard drive based iPods. In some situations, flash does make sense. For movies, it does not. A full length movie of decent quality, in MPEG4 (or equivalent) compression, is about 700 MB. My latest casual search of Froogle reveals that 1 GB Memory Stick DUOs go for $120 US (1 GB CompactFlash cards are $60 US). That means for every movie you want to take with you at a time, that is $120. Sony's new UMD Disk is not really an option, since there are no blank media or drives available, and we are at the mercy of Sony and the MPAA to extort money from us to rerelease a limited selection of titles we already own on DVD, but have to purchase again.

  9. The thing is.... by bechthros · · Score: 5, Insightful

    ...top 500 movies?! Who gives a rat's ass about their top 500? You can buy those at the store anyway. How about a huge backcatalog of obscure and indy films (kinda like iTunes has a large catalog on non-Britney music)? They might actually get some money from me then.

    1. Re:The thing is.... by jalefkowit · · Score: 4, Informative

      You hit the nail on the head there. Sony's decision to offer the top 500 shows that they really don't understand what makes ITMS so successful at all.

      If there are any Sony folks reading, you should click through and read the following articles immediately:

      Here's the key grafs from the 2nd piece (by Joe Kraus, founder of Excite and now chief of JotSpot):

      Let's look at the Amazon example. This graph shows that Amazon sells roughly 2.3M books and that the average Barnes and Noble retail store stocks 139,000 books. So, Amazon stocks roughly 2.2M more books that Barnes and Noble.

      No surprise here. That's the benefit of an online storefront. Massive inventories housed in ultra-low-rent areas that are fronted electronically.

      The astonishing figure is the percent of sales that comes from the "long tail" of books (books that Amazon carries but that Barnes and Noble doesn't).

      57%.

      57% of Amazon's sales come from books you can't even buy at a Barnes and Noble...

      Yep, just like I would imagine a good chunk of ITMS sales come from singles you can't find at your local Sam Goody -- and Kraus cites in the same article that "every iTunes song has been purchased at least once", which would seem to bear that out when you figure that ITMS has an inventory of over a million songs. That's a heck of a long tail business.

      If Sony had a brain they'd be figuring out how to use the PSP as a platform to revitalize their back catalog -- all those movies they've got sitting around that aren't Top 500 material, but which have a few fans here and there. If they can get the distribution system efficient enough the profits would probably be considerable.

  10. Re:Prices? by aussie_a · · Score: 3, Funny

    What will the prices be like?

    $0.99 per scene.

  11. Re:Read between the lines by 2674 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Sony just wants control of the market., IMHO usually are clueless when it comes to such maneuvers. The NetMD was an abortion. They always try to push their proprtietary formart/device to th market thinking that it will gurantee them market dominance. What the stupid buggers do not realize is that they LOSE market share because of such stupid tactics. Same thing here. They will try something in a similar vein with proprietary stuff, and another apple will come along and take over the market with non-proprietary standard. Like you said, Read between the Lines. They just want to gain control of the market, but are clueless on how to do it.

  12. It will probably be a hardware addon for the psp by t0qer · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I've read some comments saying "Oh the PSP screen isn't big enough, memory sticks are too small"

    My guess is that sony will make this as an option for the psp via an addon accessory. Some kind of cartridge connected to a base unit that connects to a hard drive that snaps onto the bottom of the unit.

    It will probably have video out, stereo out via a Y cable plugged into the headphone jack.

    Also folks aren't taking into consideration the modern codecs we have availiable to us these days. As an internet broadcaster, I know just how nice on2's vp6-7 series codecs look at low bittrates. I'm able to push out a full D1 res stream (720x480) at 15 FPS with stereo AAC 64kbps sound(cd quality). Altogether the stream runs at 360kbps, or about a CD for 4 hours of video.

  13. Seriously, I wonder... by dinohum · · Score: 3, Interesting

    How do I make my own UMD disks containing my home movies I shot with super-nifty keeno buttload expensive Sony video camera that I want to show grandma on our long car trip this summer on my cool new PSP? Once I find out how Sony is gonna' help me with this, I'll begin to commence to anticipate contemplating to start taking this seriously.

  14. Predictions for next year by obeythefist · · Score: 5, Insightful

    1) Sony's format won't be DRM free at all, so people will continue to make their own DRM free versions.
    2) Jon will break the DRM about a month after it's available
    3) Sony will sue Jon under DMCA (even though it's not applicable where he lives)
    4) Napster will try to get in on the act
    5) Apple/Sharman/Somebody will sue Sony for patent infringement
    6) Sales will be great but copyright infringement won't take a dent.
    7) Retail sales will take a dent and Sony will blame that on P2P instead of their own better-than-retail sales mechanism.

    Am I missing anything?

    --
    I am government man, come from the government. The government has sent me. -- G.I.R.
    1. Re:Predictions for next year by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      8) Profit!

  15. Re:Prices? by EggyToast · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Not only is the DRM liberal, the file format is high quality and the store is easy to use.

    Sony's Connect store has had rather poor success.

    But regardless of that, the iTMS didn't hit until AFTER the iPod was a success, and controlled most of the HDD MP3 player market. The PSP came out... tuesday.

    I'm all for downloadable movies, or heck, extended trailers or synopses, but people don't buy iPods so they can go buy music from the iTMS -- they use the iTMS because they already have iPods.

    The PSP will not have market saturation for a while, even if it tramples Nintendo's market. And as said above, the thing comes with a 32mb memory stick. Are users really going to shell out another hundred for a 512 stick just so they can watch a heavily compressed movie they purchased online? Or will they simply rip the DVDs they already own?

    Music is great because you can buy just one song for a buck, and it's an aggregate like that -- you get a selection of songs. Movies need to be enjoyed on the whole, in usually a full sitting.

    There just seem to be so many things already stacked against such a service's success. Now, if they were selling TV shows for a buck that would fit on cheaper memory sticks, I could see this having some impact. But, uhh, no, not for the PSP, and not without a device to play them on separate from computers. People buy music for entirely different reasons than they do movies. The fact that you can play both on a computer do not mean that they are consumed in the same way.

  16. UMD could be a success by rsborg · · Score: 3, Insightful
    The Universaly Media Disk could be a success:
    1. if they are available as UMD-Rs (they could lock down the PSP to make the media open but the player closed/DRMed... to keep their medai wing happy)
    2. if they price them right (both pre-loaded UMDs and UMD-Rs)
    I see that a lot of people saw what Apple did, and are trying their own entry into the digital media market. I wonder how these will pan out. Note however, noone is taking on Apple. They pretty much see no cash in the business... thus, they move on to the "next iPod possibility" aka Video. I wonder what Steve Jobs would say to those who make possibly flawed assumptions (ie, does "audio market" == "video market">) :-)
    --
    Make sure everyone's vote counts: Verified Voting
  17. Competing with Blockbuster / NetFlix by One+Div+Zero · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The only way it'll ever gain significant market share is if it competes with the home DVD renting.

    This means fighting Blockbuster and NetFlix on their home turf.

    The only solution? Undercut Blockbuster and NetFlix on price for a SUBSCRIPTION service that allows you to pay monthly, not by # of movies.

    Good luck to Sony on coming up with a DRM scheme that can ensure you only have 3 movies out, ala the way physical media can be tracked.

    Isn't that the dream of DRM after all? Find a way to make digital media work just like proprietary real objects?

  18. Re:This could rock, except... by Calroth · · Score: 4, Informative

    Who wants to watch a movie on a 3" screen?

    Actually, I bet that a lot of people do (or will).

    It's like audio. Back in the day, we had huge hi-fi systems, speakers, amps, the whole lot for the ultimate enjoyment of music. But then the industry brought out a whole bunch of miniature radios and players, culminating in the Sony Walkman (and OK, the iPod) and people found a whole new way to enjoy music: on the move, outside, inside, wherever they felt like it.

    Now substitute "huge hi-fi systems" with "home theatre systems" and "Sony Walkman" with "Sony PSP"...

    One of my friends has a Dell Axim (that's a Pocket PC) with a 640x480 screen, and DivX playing software. It's awesome, you can watch ripped TV shows literally where you like, on the bus, in the park outside, etc. etc., and the quality is brilliant. I could get used to that. (Not that I advocate ripping TV shows.)

  19. An interesting idea, but one main flaw by Dark+Paladin · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I've been playing with my own PSP for about a day now, and after spending another $80 for a 512 MB stick, I'm in the process of converting my unwatched episode of Battlestar Gallactica so I can watch it on the plane tomorrow. (Today Battlestar - tomorrow some anime ;) ).

    One thing that the iTunes Music Store (iTMS) did right is how they went to *all* of the major labels before launch and got them onboard. Sony's online music service, I believe, has at least Sony music. Their online movie system? Sony movies. Microsoft has MSN and - other stuff.

    When I see a iTunes Movie Store (and it doesn't have to be from Apple, really - I don't give a crap) that offers a good line of major studios (Disney, Miramax, Fox) as well as some independants (there are some documentaries that would go great with this system), let me burn it to a DVD to watch on my television or convert to a format I like (such as the PSP MPEG-4 format - then again, if I can burn my own DVD at least I could rerip it for the PSP if I feel up to it :) ), then you'll have a winner.

    So far, though, most of the iTMS-like movie stores are kind of half assed about it. I'm sure that Jobs is working in the backgrounds, but knowing the movie studios and all of the copyright/union issues to deal with (like how do you pay people for the online version of a movie compared to the DVD version per sale, and so on), I believe it will take at least another 4-5 years. Not for the technology, but for the law to catch up and studios to listen to thier pocketbooks and not their lawyers.

    Of course, that's just my opinion. I could be wrong.

  20. Suround sound by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Does it come with a surround sound rumbling butt plug? Otherwise that small screen aint going to be too exciting.

  21. did they ever heard of BitTorrent? by RicardoStaudt · · Score: 5, Funny

    "iTunes for Movies"... hmm... ins't that what BitTorrent is for?

  22. Re:Prices? by IANAAC · · Score: 4, Interesting
    I'm all for downloadable movies, or heck, extended trailers or synopses, but people don't buy iPods so they can go buy music from the iTMS -- they use the iTMS because they already have iPods.

    While you and I might think that way, not everybody does. My sister, who is pretty illiterate, technologically speaking, recently was asking what kind of iPod she should get so she could download songs.

    The power of marketing.

  23. Re:This could rock, except... by Niten · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I think you make a very good point in your comparison of the PSP to the evolution of portable music systems. However, I find it hard to believe that portable television and movies will ever be as big as the iPod.

    When we listen to music, it is often as an accompaniment to whatever other activity we happen to be engaging in at the time. I often use my iPod while I am reading, going for a run, studying in the library, or working in the lab. (I used it on my bike, too, until an officer pulled me over... but that's another story.) Television and movies, on the other hand, demand the use of both your eyes and ears, and thus your full attention. The utility of portable video as opposed to portable music therefore seems greatly diminished.

    This is not to say I think there is no market for such a device, but - and maybe I am just suffering from a case of tunnel vision here - I doubt that ten years from now we will see as many people that drag portable video players along with them wherever they go, as there are who keep their MP3 players in their side pockets today.

  24. Tricky at best. by DwarfGoanna · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Here is the problem with having too many pots cooking. As many people have said in related (iPod Video) threads, music is a background thing you have going while you do x, while watching video is something you *do*. Now, the only market segment this portable video model can really work with is children and public transit commuters. People who use a passive mode of transportation. But the PSP is well outside of "buy it and shut the kids up" pricing. This could have worked really really well for them with kids movies, but how many kids will get a PSP for good grades or whatever? Sony seems to be trying to straddle the success of Apple and Nintendo here, and a whack in the nuts is a quite possible outcome.

    --

    "You know why you do not see me styling wit my homies? Because I have no homies!!" -Mojo Jojo

  25. a comparison by CySurflex · · Score: 3, Informative
    I have been trying out different movie download services - so here are some impressions:

    • It's definitely the future. It's so much easier to click and download a movie you want to watch instead of going to the store and renting it. And it has a significant advantage over Netflix in that you don't have to plan in advance, you get instant gratification. I decide I want to watch Troy - I log in to my computer, pay the fee and can be watching it 2 minutes later as it starts downloading

    • Movielink is the venture put forth by a bunch of big movie studios. As such it has the latest movies which is good. However, it is expensive ($4.99 for 24 hour watching period!). It is also very restrictive DRM wise - you only have 24 hours, and you can only watch it on the computer you downloaded. The plus side is that they have all the latest movies

    • Starz Ticket on Real Movies - this one is cool because for a flat fee ($12.95/month I think) you can watch all the movies you want. A drawback is that they have a very limited set of movies (300 movies I think), most of them you never heard of, or heard of and never wanted to watch, and a lot of very, very old movies. BUT, besides that, the service is pretty cool - you can activate up to 3 computers, so you can download to one computer and view it on another. And you can view and download as many movies as you want. They rotate through different movies and always have about 300 or so in the library, so if they rotate "out" a movie you were watching, you can't finish watching it. But I do like this service, because unlike Movie Link you're not limited to 24 hours

    • Digital Cable / VOD / On Demand - I have Adelphia Digital Cable, and they seem to have a large library of movies "on demand". The convenience factor is great - it's already on your TV, you don't have to plug your computer into your TV to use this. Drawback is steep price - like MovieLink its $4.95 for 24 hours of viewing time. They do let you view the movie from any digital cable box in your home, so thats a little flexibility right there. And you can obviously record it to your TiVo and watch it beyond the 24 hour period. They have a lot of new movies, I'm watching Shrek 2 using this right now.

      If someone managed to combine the Starz Ticket pricing and DRM model with the movie collection of the others, that would be close to a winner.

      After having been a Netflix subscriber for 5 years, I realized that this is really the future, once people start getting it. (The vendors AND the consumers need to get it)
  26. What Sony ISN'T Telling You by piecewise · · Score: 3, Funny

    The top 500 movies will be available to purchase via the Internet...

    But they're all Betamax!

    --
    The next comment I write will be ready soon, but subscribers can beat the rush and see it early!
  27. The Danish are already doing it by donely · · Score: 3, Interesting

    starting this coming monday, danish TV station, TV2, will announce 250movies for download on their widely successful www.sputnik.dk TV2 station. Prices pr movie will likely be around $6, which is what is costs to rent a movie in Blockbuster here. They will add 250 movies each year until 2010 (obviously, this will likely change, but that is what they're currently saying). The movies will be streamed in in WMV format.

    --
    I will blog about your incompetence @ http://www.barelyadraft.com