Slashdot Mirror


The Rocky TiVo-DirecTV Relationship

Thomas Hawk writes "Phillip Swann's TV Predictions is out this morning alleging that before dumping their TiVo stock last year, Rupert Murdoch's DirecTV had made a pass at buying a controlling stake in TiVo. According to Swann, 'TiVo's top management did not like Murdoch's offer,' and Swann alleges that this is why you had a fallout between the two companies. As an interesting aside, Rob Pegoraro over at the Washington Post was out yesterday warning people to not buy an HDTV TiVo, as DirecTV will be changing their high-def signal later this year and that if you bought the HDTV TiVo that you might not be able to watch network TV in high def. As an owner of one of those expensive high-def DirecTV TiVos, I sure hope this isn't the case."

39 of 219 comments (clear)

  1. YAFM (Yet Another Fine Mirror) by winkydink · · Score: 5, Informative

    Mirrored links

    Thomas Hawk writes "Phillip Swann's TV Predictions is out this morning alleging that before dumping their TiVo stock last year, Rupert Murdoch's DirecTV had made a pass at buying a controlling stake in TiVo. According to Swann, 'TiVo's top management did not like Murdoch's offer,' and Swann alleges that this is why you had a fallout between the two companies. As an interesting aside, Rob Pegoraro over at the Washington Post was out yesterday warning people to not buy an HDTV TiVo, as DirecTV will be changing their high-def signal later this year and that if you bought the HDTV TiVo that you might not be able to watch network TV in high def. As an owner of one of those expensive high-def DirecTV TiVos, I sure hope this isn't the case."

    --

    "I'd rather be a lightning rod than a seismometer." -Ken Kesey

  2. When will they by RedElf · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Standardize on one format or another so we don't have to buy a new TiVo like device every 6-18 months?

    --
    You know, I have one simple request. And that is to have sharks with frickin' laser beams attached to their heads!
    1. Re:When will they by jm92956n · · Score: 3, Insightful
      ...Standardize on one format or another so we don't have to buy a new TiVo like device every 6-18 months?

      As soon as planned obsolesence becomes illegal.

      --
      An effective signature identifies a particular user amongst a base of thousands.
    2. Re:When will they by Sc00ter · · Score: 4, Interesting
      DirecTV is coming out with their own DVR that will be some kind of home entertainment thing. You'll have one "master" system that will do all the recording and then other systems hooked up to other TVs that will get the information from the master system. It will also allow streaming from your computer for music and pictures.

      There is only two "formats" of TiVo for DirecTV, the normal ones that record the stream from the sat, and the new HDTV TiVo's that cost a grand. So I don't see why you would have to buy a new one every "6-8 months" as you suggest.

      If you call them now and inquire about a DVR they direct you to the new home entertainment unit that will be coming out soon

    3. Re:When will they by taniwha · · Score: 3, Insightful
      Actually I think they probably are - DTV was bought by Sky a while back, DTV's signal is just about the most non-standard satellite/cable signal there is out there (everyone else uses relatively standard transport streams, DTV use something of their own design). Sky on the other hand uses DVB (what just everyone else in the world but the US cable/TV guys use - including DiSH).

      While I work in the biz (but none of sky/dtv/tivo) I'd guess that Sky are making DTV switch to DVB so all their gear is interoperable

    4. Re:When will they by baudilus · · Score: 3, Insightful

      When people stop buying them every 6-18 months.

    5. Re:When will they by Em+Ellel · · Score: 3, Informative

      personally, I still own a pair of Series 1 DTivos from about 5 years ago and they still work great - no plans to upgrade any time soon. You do not HAVE to buy a new device of any sort every 6-18 mos, you WANT to. Do not confuse the two.

      -Em

      --
      RelevantElephants: A Somatic WebComic...
  3. it's true by skaeight · · Score: 5, Informative

    Directv is switching to MPEG-4 encoding this year with the launch of the spaceway sats. I'm sure there will be a transition period so your HDTiVo should work for a while, but there will come a point where you will have to upgrade.

    A couple of good sites to find more info are:

    http://www.dbsforums.com
    http://www.dbstalk.com
    http://www.tivocommunity.com

  4. HD Tivo is obsolete by Ironsides · · Score: 5, Insightful

    As DirectTV is moving forward on changing to Advanced Video Codecs (AVCs) such as H.264 the current HD Tivos will become obsolete as they can only recieve the current encoding of MPEG-2. Sorry, but tis true. I also doubt that Tivo will make an update to the MPEG-2 HDs to recieve the new codec. Also, I have heard that DirectTV is moving to the DVB-S2 transmission standard from their current DVB-S. Extra information and/or signal strength, their choice.

    --
    Fly me to the moon Let me sing among those stars Let me see what spring is like On jupiter and mars
  5. cablecard by alatesystems · · Score: 5, Interesting

    This is why the CableCard is so important, so that multiple devices can operate like the company provided boxes. I have a cable company dvr, and it is really awesome, but if I wanted to use a brand name TiVo, I would be pissed at having to use IR blasters.

    As far as I know, there's no cablecard equivalent for satellite boxes, but there should be. Ahh, the incredible balance between freedom and regulation.

    1. Re:cablecard by wembley · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The cable companies hate CableCard, which was federally mandated. They lose another revenue stream (hardware), and you have an interface they can't necessarily control and spam OnDemand ads onto.

      With the repeated granting of 1-year extensions on the CableCard deadline, don't hold your breath waiting for it. We still don't have all the HD content that was FCC mandated...

      --

      Share and Enjoy!

    2. Re:cablecard by Sc00ter · · Score: 3, Interesting
      In order for that to work then the signal would have to be the same, and it's not.

      I had a SA TiVo on cable for a while. I had the old style box with an IR Blaster and it worked fine, never missed a show or had any issues with it.

      Most digital cable boxes can be controled with the serial cable from the TiVo to increase speed and reliablility.

      The DirecTiVo units record the stream from the sats, so they are incompatible for that reason. But they give you PERFECT quality, something the SA TiVo's can't do.

      The signals will probably always be different between cable and sat, so I don't know what they could do. I see a future where cable companies use different encoding for their streams, making the cablecard worthless anyway :(

    3. Re:cablecard by Lumpy · · Score: 5, Informative

      you are a fucking liar.

      the Cable companies do NOT hate the cablecard. It's motorola, Scientifica Atlanta and Jerrold as well as other sattelite and Catv headend gear makers.

      all of them REFUSE to follow any standards and intercooperate to ensure headend and plant lock-in on cable companies. If you are an all motorola cable company you haveto throw away EVERYTHING to use any SA gear. Motorola Loves that. SA does the same damn thing.

      the cablecard gives up the monopoly of locking in the cable companies to a single vendor for their headend gear.

      the rest of the world uses a single standard... the US has several that are bastardized by each equipment makes to ensure there is no interoperability.

      so take your cabletv company hating LIES and go elsewhere.

      if you want cablecard to exist then tell Motorola to quit fighting it as well as the other equipment makers.

      if they ran the damned DVB standard like the rest of the world this all would be a non issue.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    4. Re:cablecard by PepeGSay · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Moderate parent up. He is dead right. Cable companies do not make any appreciable money on cable boxes. This is because the cable companies screwed up their provider model for the cable boxes and locked themselves into the few providers which they pay nearly $500 for a cable box. I worked for a cable company and this was one of the big reasons they supported the DOCSIS standard for cable modems which brought cable modems down into the $80 range, and possibly even lower now.

    5. Re:cablecard by The+Vulture · · Score: 3, Informative

      Not the best way to start off a post, but you are correct. It's Motorola and SA (Scientific Atlanta) playing the game.

      However, at the same time, cable operators are afraid of CableCard. The advantage of freeing them up to use any frontend that they want also scares them. At least by forging a relationship with Motorola or SA, they can get their boxes branded and control the content. With CableCard, anybody can make a set-top box, with no branding, no advertising lock-in, and no guaranteed content protection.

      What I would really love to see is a PCI card that accepts a CableCard, which can be used to decrypt the digital cable content. Not so that I can spread the shows around the Internet, but so that I can use the features of my MythTV machine. (Yes, the content has to be decrypted for MythTV to really make any use of it, otherwise the PCI card has to have video out. MythTV would still lose the OSD feature, and it would be harder to configure.)

      Microsoft might be the closest ally on that, since they'll need a way to capture digital cable content for their Media Center platform (if they wish to continue that).

      -- Joe

  6. This is Business news, really. by ackthpt · · Score: 5, Insightful
    I heard on the BBC WS this morning that LG and Matsushita had settled some stink about IP and plasma screens, which restricted markets in Korea and Japan, until settled, but didn't think it was 'News for Nerds' and was 'stuff that didn't matter'

    With TiVo selling out to Comcast and pushing pop-up ads, I can't feel much positive about them anymore.

    --

    A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
  7. Foxblocking Tivo? by AtariAmarok · · Score: 5, Funny

    With Murdoch taking over all of Tivo, we'll need a sort of different kind of Foxblocker for this. I suggest gluing a couple of cable TV jacks to either end of a wooden spool, and inserting this in your incoming co-ax cable.

    --
    Don't blame Durga. I voted for Centauri.
  8. Times they are a changin... by barfy · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I am an owner of the HDTV box, and yes it was expensive, and it has already been broken and replaced once ...

    But it is the *ONLY* box that does what it does. 2 OTA tuners, 2 Satellite Tuners, both OTA and Satellite HD...

    But Mpeg4 is coming, and this box has NO way to deal with it. And even as an owner of the box, I welcome MPEG4, as this will give me what I really want... Not "digital quality", but "quality digital". Replacing all of the boxes out there is cheaper than building and launching a satellite. HD will be where they go first, but eventually ALL DirectTV will be mpeg4.

    I am sad that there was a breakdown between Tivo and DirectTV, because the combo *is* the best way to watch tv today.

    There is some promise apparantly for us HDTiVo folks to replace our boxes with something "as good or better". We shall see when it happens. For now, I LOVE my HDTiVo.

    1. Re:Times they are a changin... by Sc00ter · · Score: 3, Interesting
      But the new sat is for spot beams (locals). So if you have the new DirecTV DVR (the multiroom one that is not released yet), you'll be able to get all the same programming you can get now.

      Can you record your OTA HD channels with the HDTiVo?

  9. Pleasing customers by notthe9 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I doubt that they would make the devices like the article poster's non-functional too soon, seeing as people who buy stuff like that are often the kind of customer who would get the most pissed off.

    Business before hate.

  10. Re:No problem. by Gannoc · · Score: 5, Funny

    http://www.epa.gov/chemrtk/vccep/sponsor2.htm

    pffft. Running water. All of you people out there with your runner water are just rotting your minds and bodies. In my family, we read books and discuss philosophy while making the 3/4 mile trek to our well. We don't use running water, and we're better people for it. Don't even get me started on electicity and your demon antibiotics.

  11. Re:No problem. by pjbgravely · · Score: 5, Informative

    I live in a fringe area with no cable. I can get broadcast channels using rooftop $150 antennas and signal boosters. I got a HDTV tuner and now can see of the channels crystal clear, that is when they are broadcasting, most aren't full time yet. I am only 45 miles from one city but the hills really block the analog signal, while the digital gets through. It might be worth your while to try next year when most will be digital.

    --
    Star Trek, there maybe hope.
  12. Yes it is true by doormat · · Score: 4, Informative

    DirecTV will be moving to a 8PSK signal modulation system and to MPEG-4 for HD for the SpaceWay satellite system, both of which are incompatible with the HD DirecTivo. You'll still get the old HD channels broadcast over the older satellites (Ku band, QPSK and MPEG-2), but none of the new fancy stuff (Ka band, 8PSK and MPEG-4).

    --
    The Doormat

    If you're not outraged, then you're not paying attention.
  13. Answers to Foxblocking by AtariAmarok · · Score: 4, Funny

    Where oh where is the conservative answer to this? The "RatherNot (tm)" CBS news blocker. The "Clean the Air America" radio filter. The "Ted Turnoff" CNN filter. And last but not least, the "Moving Out" web filter that blocks moveon.org.

    --
    Don't blame Durga. I voted for Centauri.
  14. I misread the title... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    ...and thought "What the hell does Sylvester Stallone have to do with TiVo?"...

    1. Re:I misread the title... by gclef · · Score: 3, Funny

      And I thought: flying squirrels? TiVo? Really?

  15. Rocky & TiVo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    Bullwinkle: Hey, Rocky! Watch me pull a TiVo out of this hat.

    Rocky: That trick never works.

    /Bullwinkle reaches in hat and pulls out MGM Lion's head.

    MGM Lion: ROOOOOOOOOOAAAAAAAAAARRRRRRRR!!!

    Bullwinkle: Oops. Guess I need a new hat.

  16. They're doing both. by raygundan · · Score: 3, Informative

    The first thing in MPEG4 will be HD locals, which you don't have now, so you won't really be losing anything. Up next will be the existing HD channels, and that's where you'll feel the first loss. The real kicker is when the full MPEG4 transition occurs-- this is where you're going to lose all your non-HD channels.

    It's likely that they will offer you a replacement box (although this is just me speculating) for free or at a steep discount, since those of you with the HD-Tivo are highend customers. Unfortunately for the Tivo faithful, it won't be a Tivo.

  17. I love the smell of.... by AtariAmarok · · Score: 3, Funny
    "...arrangement of words called a sentance. please attempt..."

    I love the smell of self-immolating grammar nazis in the morning.

    --
    Don't blame Durga. I voted for Centauri.
  18. No surprise by sunderland56 · · Score: 4, Funny
    I'd have loved to be there during the meetings... one megalomaniac headstrong Brit and one megalomaniac headstrong Scot, in a room together, both thinking they're God. Wonderful. Odds on those two agreeing is so close to zero nobody's going to give you odds.

    I get DirecTV HD, but there's no way I'm spending one dime on anything so close to bankruptcy as Tivo.

    1. Re:No surprise by Generic+Guy · · Score: 4, Insightful
      I get DirecTV HD, but there's no way I'm spending one dime on anything so close to bankruptcy as Tivo.

      Okay, I can't just let this dog lie undisturbed. TiVo is not close to bankruptcy, despite their misgivings on Wall Street. In fact, as of their last conference call, they are expecting to turn profitable by the end of this year. They intend to balance revenue from three streams: hardware, subscriptions, and ad sponsers. That's good news for TiVo faithful.

      The bad news is that they plan to reach profitability by sacrificing the ideals which brought them the love in the first place. Their hardware gets less reliable each iteration and harder to hack (for your own software patches). They sell ad space on the interface top menu. And now they are beginning to push pop-up ads on their paying subscribers (while you fast-forward). The recent deal with Comcast will put some variation of TiVo software on Comcast DVRs, most likely with the pop-up ads.

      It remains to be seen how losing 2/3 of their base from DirecTV (in 2007) will affect TiVo, but they should be profitable by then. Don't hate TiVo for 'dying' like BSD and Apple. Instead, hate TiVo for sacrificing their own ideals.

      --
      { - Generic Guy - }
  19. DirectTV TiVos safe by deanj · · Score: 5, Insightful

    If you have one of those DirectTV TiVos, DirectTV is the outfit that sold it to you in the first place. If they change their signal, complain to DirectTV, not the TiVo.

    1. Re:DirectTV TiVos safe by Sponge+Bath · · Score: 3, Funny
      ...complain to DirectTV, not the TiVo

      No way dude!
      I'm complaining to Slashdot, as usual.

  20. I can't wait for the new formats! by Chris+Pimlott · · Score: 4, Funny

    I'm glad to see I'm not the only excited about this upcoming switch! I mean, sure,
    Ku band, QPSK and MPEG-2 are alright. But
    Ka band, 8PSK and MPEG-4 are clearly going to blow them all away! (At least until Ko Band, ¥PSK and MPEG-7 come out...)

  21. TIVO access to DirecTV by Digital+Pizza · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Does the FCC's new CableCard requirement help with DirectTV access at all? And yeah, I do know it's CableCard, but still...

    --
    We apologize for the inconvenience.
  22. Rumored Trade-in Plan for new HMCs by ac3boy · · Score: 5, Informative

    Here is the rumored trade-in plan to get the new HMCs. It is very generous but I hope they stick to it.

    HMC Cost update.

    Latest info:

    Two base (HD HMC) units with different capacity.

    1) 240 GB - $499 + $99 for SD units and $199 for HD remote units
    2) 480 GB - $599 + $99 for SD units and $199 for HD remote units

    Trade in Values:

    HD-TiVo -> High capacity unit + 2 HD remote units
    SD TiVo -> Low capacity Unit + 1 SD remote unit
    SD Receiver -> Low Capacity unit and 1 SD for every three (3) SD receivers.
    It's basically a price match. For example, if you have two SD TiVo's and an standard HD unit, you can obtain the High Capacity + 1 HD remote unit in exchange.

    Values on units for trade in:

    Standard SD Receiver - No value for HMC - 1 for 1 on SD remote units
    Standard HD Receiver - Low cap HMC or 1 HD Remote unit
    1 TiVo - Low Capacity HMC + SD Unit
    2 TiVo - High Capacity HMC + SD Unit, or High Capacity + SD Unit

    Dollar Value:

    SD Receiver $99
    HD Receiver $399
    TiVo $199
    HD TiVo - $899

  23. Re:TV? What is that? by LetterJ · · Score: 4, Insightful

    No different than the mind control device that has managed to turn all people without a TV into automatons, reciting the same liturgy of disdain at every available opportunity. You are not morally superior, intellectually free or otherwise improved simply because of your rejection of TV.

    Likewise, I'm not a better person because I choose not to drink alcohol. Does not drinking alcohol give me more time to pursue more "noble" activities each week that is unclouded by alcoholic distractions? Absolutely. However, so would a number of other choices like avoiding Slashdot. Is my wife a better person than you because she abstains from participating on this site? No.

    TV is one form of entertainment out of many. And, despite the deep longings and ideal dreams of the anti-TV elite, removing televisions from homes will not result in 230 million Americans suddenly picking up Tolstoy. Rather, they'd simply turn to other forms of entertainment that demand equally little of their intellect.

    I enjoy TV. I enjoy movies. I enjoy books. I have not stated a logical paradox in the previous 3 sentences.

  24. It hasn't even helped with stand-alone Tivo! by swb · · Score: 3, Informative

    Last I heard, no CableCard Tivos until 2006, which is idiotic. Rumor has it that a rev to the CableCard spec to make it somewhat saner (and more desirable to end-users) is why, but I still think it smells like either (another) bungle by Tivo or cable stalling, or both.

    I can't see why CableCard would help with satellite systems, since you can make the argument that the satellite signal format is a function of competitive advantage (channels, dish sizes, etc).

    The real reason is that both Dish and DTV want their systems as incompatible as possible, as it is a barrier to migration to the competitive product.

    I do like the idea, though, of an uber-smart 'cablecard' enabled Tivo that can tune digital cable, DTV and Dish simultaenously (presumably with two, self-aiming dishes).

  25. Marketers need to learn... by CDarklock · · Score: 3, Insightful

    You cannot *make* us watch your commercials, and the harder you try, the more we will hate you.

    Let's take the recent commercial for Lime Coke. They have this neat little play on Harry Nilsson's classic song "Coconut", which is amusing already, and they made a cute little vignette out of it. But once I've seen it four or five times, I'm done. I never need to see it again. If I was going to try Lime Coke, and I was, I would already have tried it -- which I did -- and decided whether I wanted to continue buying it, which I do. The sale is over. Any *further* commercials they show me for Lime Coke are a complete waste of time. And that's a commercial that SUCCEEDS.

    So when you start worrying about whether I'm going to skip your commercials and you won't get your money's worth, you need a reality check. I don't watch your commercials ANYWAY. When your commercials come on, I will either watch them -- the first couple of times -- or else I will converse with my wife, go to the bathroom, check my email, or grab a snack from the kitchen.

    I am not going to sit and watch your commercials no matter WHAT you do. The most you can do is force me to wait for what I actually *want* to be doing, during which time I will be annoyed and impatient and looking at your product's name. How do you think I'm going to feel when I see your product in a store? Why, I'll feel annoyed and impatient, of course. And that *doesn't* translate to increased sales.

    --
    Microsoft cheerleader, blue flag waving, you got a problem with that?