Slashdot Mirror


Aussie TV Networks Fight BitTorrent

An anonymous reader writes "It seems impatient TV viewers have discovered BitTorrent in Australia mainly because the networks there are so slow; programs are at times behind by up to 8 months! According to an independent study, it takes an average of four months to watch the latest episodes of top-rated shows like Lost and Desperate Housewives. There are now calls for TV networks to consider offering episodes for download at a small cost."

48 of 550 comments (clear)

  1. Heak! it would even work in the US. by ForestGrump · · Score: 4, Funny

    I'd gladly pay a feww dollars/month to download TV eps (sans commericals)- if I don't have to mess with torrents (and it comes down at my full 3meg/sec)

    --
    Is it true that more people vote for the winner of American Idol, than vote for the president? -Ali G.
    1. Re:Heak! it would even work in the US. by ozmanjusri · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Actually, someone here on an iiNet DSLAM would probably get close to those kind of speeds if they were close to the exchange.

      I'm on one of those and on their 8Mb/sec plan. If you can find a server that'll keep up, it'd be close, but normally other bottlenecks step into play.
      Nice when it works though...

      --
      "I've got more toys than Teruhisa Kitahara."
  2. Like the Peacekeeper wars by mgv · · Score: 5, Insightful

    If you were as much a farscape fan as I am, you would understand the frustration in not being able to get the peacekeeper wars by any legal means in Australia.

    The dissapointing thing is that there is no reason why this shouldn't be available in Oz right now. Its not even like film, where the latest releases only have a certain number of reels to go around the world.

    If I can get a high quality copy easily over the internet, why can't the networks figure out how to do it for a profit?

    Michael

    --
    There is no cryptographic solution to the problem where the intended receiver and the attacker are the same entity.
    1. Re:Like the Peacekeeper wars by digitalchinky · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Australia has 20 million people spread across a landmass roughly the size of the US (minus Alaska) The USA has somewhere on the order of 250 million people units.

      In Australia the average city can support maybe 5 or 6 free to air television stations, and we don't have nearly as many cities either, in the US? (many more usually)

      I think it's about economics, while I agree that it sucks very badly, I think there just isn't enough money thrown around to support such a wide variety of television shows. (Television stations usually have to purchase the rights to air them I gather?)

      I think if the Australian ISP's got in on the act and added a surcharge (small) for a local FTP server filled with these shows, many people would opt in. Downloads would have to be fast, and adverts - well, I think they'll never go away.

    2. Re:Like the Peacekeeper wars by medge_42 · · Score: 5, Informative

      Not too sure what you mean here. Amazon has the DVDs available already. You can buy them from the US, and play them on your multi-zone player.
      All perfectly legal, all perfectly legit.
      The trade practices act of 1974 and the copyright ammendments come together to make the zoning of DVDs illegal in Australia. All that's needed is a court decision to make it law.
      Any thing that restricts choice is illegal(Trade Practices) and we are allowed to parallel import(Copyright amendment). To the best of my knowledge neither have been negated by the further amendments.

    3. Re:Like the Peacekeeper wars by Nos. · · Score: 5, Informative

      Canada has a population nearing 30 million, and a land mass significantly larger than the US. Yet, we have two Satellite television providers. In the province I live in (Saskatchewan) anyone in a city with a population of around 1000 people has access to high speed internet. The local telco has also started offering wireless which means anyone living within I believe about 30Km of selected spots, will also have high speed available.

      The thing is, around here, a lot of money was invested in the infrastructure for many years. If the copyright holders would begin to allow us to download our favourite shows (for a fee) then we certainly have the infrastructure to support it.

      As for Austrailia, if the government can (and has the money to) get involved, there are a lot of new technologies coming out such as WiMax that can begin to offer high speed internet without the infrastructure costs normally associated with something like expanding DSL to a new area.

    4. Re:Like the Peacekeeper wars by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Economics is only part of the story.

      Australia does NOT have a TV Network. We have a few lame, protected stations, that broadcast 22 minutes of commercials per hour - truely 3rd world standard.

      Content is late, and uncertain - and not to 'best practice'. Thanks to easy, electronic access, punters will not tolerate such slackness.

      The stations pay 300-600% MORE for programs (per viewer) than they do, in say America, then compound the situation by trying to get 'Sports', and 'exclusivity', plus movies by 'Cable' companies to siphon even more content. Australians have a lower disposable income, so advertisers get poor value indeed.

      Unsurprisingly, the reaction of punters, um er viewers, is to cancel cable ($72 month for about a dozen channels and with commercials) for a $30 all you can hire at the local DVD outlet. Fast-Forwarding and internet options are attractive options.

      Aussie TV is dysfunctional, inefficient, protected, coddled, commercial ridden, and saddled with overpriced long term movie house agreements.

      Downloading has many pluses. Telstra makes bucks, and the TV stations have REAL reasons for getting content cheaper - because their viewing audience is declining, because they can't negotiate back to profitability. While they mull, more and more will use internet to get their fair share or free to air, with a long antenna.

    5. Re:Like the Peacekeeper wars by Harassed · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I think it's important to point out that while Canada is a massive country (2nd or 3rd largest iirc) with a relatively small population (half that of the UK!), it is also a fact that the vast bulk of the population - somewhere in the high 90%s - live within an hour or so's drive of the US border!

  3. And New Zealand is just as bad... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    New Zealand has the exact same problem. There are shows I've heard about that were on in the US 3-4 years ago that will never show here...

    Ah, television - teacher, mother, secret lover. Why must you treat me so badly?

  4. Commercials by elbenito69 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    If the TV networks did decide to offer downloads at a cost, would they still include advertisements in the download, or would the cost of the download be sufficient to make up for the lost advertising revenue?

  5. Aussies by drivinghighway61 · · Score: 5, Funny

    I'm fairly certain it takes 8 months to change all instances of "Hello" to "G'day!" and all instances of "fries" to "chips." Really, aside from that, Australian people aren't so different after all.

    1. Re:Aussies by _generica · · Score: 5, Funny

      I hope a dingo eats your baby, you insensitive clod!

    2. Re:Aussies by Chuq · · Score: 5, Informative

      Australia actually gets US shows unedited (well, bits cut out to fit more ads in, but we learn your "cultural" terms).

      Its actually happens the other way around - some lines in "Crocodile Dundee" were changed for Americans - I think 'stickybeak' became 'busybody' or something obscure - but that whole movie is a stereotype anyway. In "The Castle", 'rissoles' became 'meatloaf'.

      --
      - Chuq
    3. Re:Aussies by ozbird · · Score: 4, Interesting

      In the case of Mythbusters (shown on SBS), for some reason they've actually replaced the commentary with an Australian dub.
      The comments are identical to the US version, which I had no trouble understanding. What's with that?

    4. Re:Aussies by lushman · · Score: 5, Interesting

      The reason for the dub is that it then becomes "Australian Content" and fits into the broadcaster's quota for local programs.
      Channel 10 did it a bit to. Ever wondered why Sandra Sully had to "present" a wildlife documentary? Those minute-or-so spiels she would give at either end of the program were completely pointless to the viewer, but to the regulator, they made the program "Australian".

    5. Re:Aussies by 1u3hr · · Score: 3, Insightful
      Many low budget movies that get big releases have the soundtrack redone from scratch with better equipment. If the studio was going to release it in America, it made sense to redo the soundtrack with voices that Americans could easily understand. It's not a dialogue focused movie anyway.

      With respect, bullshit. if it wasn't a "dialogue focused" movie, why would they bother to redub at all? I've seen and heard it with the original soundtrack, there's nothng "wrong" with it except the accents. And Mad Max didn't get a big US release, Mel Gibson was unknown in the US, I think it went out on the drive-in circuit. They just thought the rednecks couldn't cope with the ocker accents.

  6. Not just late, but... by kgbspy · · Score: 5, Interesting

    It's not just things being 8-12 months (on average) behind, say, the US or UK, it's also the insistence of the commercial networks (specifically Channel 9) to drop series without notice, schedule program episodes in the wrong order, or change the scheduling of episodes at the last minute.

    I'm not surprised that people are taking television programming into their own hands in this country...

    --
    ~
    ~
    ~
    -- INSERT --
    1. Re:Not just late, but... by awful · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Well exactly - if the networks insist on treating their customers badly, eventually their customers will look for alternatives. And then the networks will turn around and scream at the government to help them stop their customers exercising freedom of choice.

    2. Re:Not just late, but... by Sailor+Coruscant · · Score: 3, Informative

      I stopped watching television on air about three years ago, because it was too hard trying to keep up with what the networks were doing to it.

      Futurama was shown completely out of order, Farscape was tossed around from one timeslot to another before finally being shown consistantly in an afternoon spot and Buffy and Angel were never in sync due to things being shuffled around for sports or other 'specials' one night of the week, so crossovers would never match up.

      A great example just recently was that Channel 7 stopped showing Desperate Housewives (and Lost?) for three weeks 'because of Easter'. I don't know anyone who took three weeks off for easter (even the schools stayed open save for the public holidays) so I'm not sure why they would do this.

      It's so much easier to just download things (and later buy them on DVD) than to try and figure out what's going on with the show you want to watch. Make it easier for us (either show it on tv in good time or let us download it for a fee) and maybe more people will watch tv.

    3. Re:Not just late, but... by Alioth · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You aren't their customers though - you are their product. The advertisers are their customers and they are selling your 'eyeballs'.

  7. Absolutely by ta+bu+shi+da+yu · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I got StarGate Atlantis because I didn't think they were going to show it at all. However, now they have (gah!). That's not the only reason I'd use it though: the networks are notorious for rescheduling shows at inconvinient times - or they drop them altogether! So hence we need to use BitTorrent.

    --
    XML is like violence. If it doesn't solve the problem, use more.
    1. Re:Absolutely by _Hellfire_ · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I got really annoyed with Stargate and channel 7 - it was on again, off again, changed times, off for a few weeks while some crap was on.

      They did the same thing to 24 Season 3 (I'm a BIG 24 nut).

      They switched the timing around 3 times, and had some stupid sport special on and delayed the series a week. For a show that ends on a cliffhanger every episode that is fucking annoying.

      Guess what the big surprise twist in 24 Season 3 was? The fact that Nina Myers rocks up when you're least expecting her. Shock factor++ for fans. What does channel seven do 5 seconds before the show starts? Voiceover: "Nina Myers returns to 24...Now!" - show start.

      I almost threw something at the tv. I spent the entire episode wondering how they were going to bring her in and I wasn't surprised when she showed up. Thanks a lot.

      Add to that the fact that Channel 7 can't even tell us when 24 Season 4 is going to be aired, and I've had enough.

      Well, they're up to episode 15 of 24-S4 in the US. Guess how many episodes are sitting on my hard drive courtesy of BitTorrent.

      Fuck em. If they're going to screw around that much, I can't be bothered putting up with their shit. That's my reason for using BT and if they want to stop that, they can clean up their act and I'll start watching the TV and muting the ads like I used to.

      --
      "And then I visited Wikipedia ...and the next 8 hours are a blur..."
  8. they just now figured it out? by dj42 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I don't understand how media companies can be so far behind on figuring out digital distribution over the internet...

    --
    We are one consciousness experiencing itself subjectively. Back to you with the weather, Bob!
  9. Four months? by shreevatsa · · Score: 3, Funny

    With my dialup internet connection, it would take an average of four months to download it from Bittorent!

    1. Re:Four months? by Zilverfire · · Score: 3, Funny

      hehe, 4 months early!

      --
      "Could you put that in a memo entitled, SHIT I ALREADY KNOW!" - Sarge
  10. i would pay a "reasonable fee" for tv downloads... by fredrickleo · · Score: 3, Insightful

    riveting stuff... of course american networks should just make their tv shows available for a fee, and allow international customers with a valid credit card or paypal to purchase the content too. I'm sure however, that the networks make far more money hawking the tv shows abroad to other networks after they've had their run in the states.

    --
    Yay me! ^^
  11. Why not have worldwide simultaneous airing? by doormat · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Its not like we dont have these satellites and stuff that can beam programming around the planet in the course of a few seconds, especially for english speaking countries like the UK and Australia... even if its a few days behind, its better than 8 months.

    --
    The Doormat

    If you're not outraged, then you're not paying attention.
  12. Typical by Heem · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Typical Corporate response: Fight the technology, instead of the real issue. Lets say they can defeat the torrent, then what? You have to fight every other method of downloading the episode, and then just for fun lets say they succeed at that, you'd have to fight someone in another country sending someone a tape of the episode.

    The correct answer is: If this is truly affecting your business, then you need to provide the customer with what they want, in a way that will allow you to realize a profit. Get the episodes on in a timely fashion, and they will watch.

    --
    Don't Tread on Me
    1. Re:Typical by mystik · · Score: 5, Insightful

      If Aussie tv is anything like American tv, you must remember one important thing.

      You are not the customer.

      The advertisers are.

      It suddenly becomes apparent that they *are* doing what the customers want: namely, full control of the distribution channel.

      --
      Why aren't you encrypting your e-mail?
  13. Broadcatching by Alien+Venom · · Score: 5, Informative

    There are a number of articles that describe a process known as "broadcatching." Basically it uses RSS feeds from certan TV torrent sites and a BitTorrent client. EnGadget has an article describing this, and how to do it. It's what I do and I don't even live outside of the US! Shows usually come out an hour or two before they broadcast in my local area, which means, for example, I can download the HDTV version of my favorite show (without commercials) and finish watching it even before it starts in my time zone. Amazing!

  14. And not just TV by Petrushka · · Score: 4, Informative

    Movies too. Some of the most interesting movies get released at the same time world-wide, but for others we're up to six months behind the northern hemisphere - I'm in NZ, not Australia, but the problem is similar.

    In the case of NZ, though, there is an extra obstacle in the form of a telecommunications monopoly keeping a stranglehold on all ISPs so that all broadband accounts are capped -- usually at 10 GB per month -- though some allow downloads beyond that limit, only at dial-up speeds. This means that downloading isn't quite as viable an option here as it is in Australia.

  15. Canada shielded from the "non-American" effect by saskboy · · Score: 3, Interesting

    If Canadians weren't largely capable of getting American satelite signals on the grey and black markets for the last 2 decades then chances are we could have wound up in a similar pickle where if CTV or CBC or Global didn't pick up a show, we'd simply not be able to see it for months. Although Canadian cable and satellite offer ABC, NBC, and CBS the primary US Networks, and have for decades. Thank goodness for geography.

    Anyway, as far as Bit torrent goes, I don't think Australia will be the first country to authorize it's TV stations to go with Bit torrent "broadcasting". I predict it will be a Scandanavian country that will break the mold, and pave the way for TV distribution for the next 5 years before the next best thing comes along.

    --
    Saskboy's blog is good. 9 out of 10 dentists agree.
  16. "Up to 8 months"? Pfft. by lpontiac · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The West Wing is currently stalled about halfway through Season Five in Australia on free-to-air. The last episode of Season Six screens in the US this coming week. The channel that has the rights over here won't even state whether it's coming back at all, let along when. Pay TV (cable or satellite) isn't a solution - one cable channel is currently screening repeats of Season One). In addition, I own the first four seasons on DVD and intend to purchase S5 and S6 on DVD as soon as they become available. So, you'll just have to pardon me for not feeling particularly guilty about having seen ripped episodes that are yet to air down here.

  17. Why pay? It's ad-supported! by ilyaaohell · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I never understood the concept behind either paying for TV show downloads, or for the broadcast networks rejecting the medium. Last I checked, broadcast television access was free. It's free because they show several segments of advertising in the middle of the show. Why would the medium matter to these companies? Why stick with television sets?

    The advantage of downloading stuff is that you can watch it whenever you want. My schedule may not permit me to watch the shows I want. If you give me the same exact show with the same exact ads over the internet, I will gladly watch it! With the ads! I don't give a damn about the show not being ad-free, and I don't give a damn about them even developing a technology preventing you from fast-forwarding past the advertising. I'll watch the damn advertising, just like I watch it on TV. Just let me watch the damn show at the computer if the need strikes me! You lose NOTHING. Even if someone does fast-forward through the commercials, someone else will watch the same file TWICE, thus increasing their exposure to the advertising. Is this not an acceptable trade-off?

    --
    UNIX: A computer user is defined as a programmer. WINDOWS: A computer user is defined as a consumer.
    1. Re:Why pay? It's ad-supported! by RocketRainbow · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The above comment is not insightful!

      Here is the real model for TV distribution and why your proposal doesn't work:

      1. Some studio makes a TV show.
      2. They sell it to national TV channels who distribute it to their local broadcasters
      3. Local and national advertisers pay the local and national TV stations to run the show.

      Now if you were to watch over the Intermanet, it wouldn't have the same local ads in it, now, would it?
      Perhaps the TV could advertise - "Did you miss a show? Watch it streaming on www.ChannelNineCanberra.com.au!" and you could get your own ads for porno and fireworks (or whatever sells in your local area). But then the USA channels are going to be mighty miffed that you're robbing them of their potential viewers by broadcasting this stuff on the Intermanet. As are the local distributers in Finland, for example.

      But most of all, the people who actually make and sell the TV show are going to be highly dubious about changing their distribution model in this way.

      Actually I think it's silly. Given that an hour of your time spent watching ads costs about $1, you'd think you could just pay the people who make the stuff $1 for every hour of TV you watch over your computer using their streamer-viewer or some login account or who knows what. Porno manages to sell just videos and many of them keep in business, so why can't the TV people sell videos?

      But simply expecting TV channels to take the feed you would have got and stick it on the internet is not going to work. How many times did you watch it? What targeted ads did you see? The advertisers aren't going to pay for this loss of control. Local streamed downloads seem easier, but there will be licensing issues as the internet broadcaster tries to convince all the other broadcasters that it's still worth them buying in (the studio will not be convinced that the internet broadcaster will make more money than all the world's TV channels).

      Please remember that you are not the customers of this industry - you are consumers whose behaviour is legislated for the economic benefit of the TV channels and advertisers. They are going to do what works best for them and you are going to comply or else. Disagree? Don't watch TV!

      --
      *#*#*#*#*#******* I love peanut butter sandwiches!
  18. Re:Its interesting.... by Chuq · · Score: 3, Funny

    Yeah, we don't want people thinking that the nickname "Oz" comes from the pronunciation of the first syllable of "Australia" or anything.

    --
    - Chuq
  19. Aussie TV Networks, Fight bitTorrent! by FidelCatsro · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The title is a bit misleading in its current form , after reading the artical i find that it should be "Aussie TV Networks sit around doing little ".
    This is a world wide phenominon and i personaly download some TV shows , One simple fact why i do it here ,German TV dubs programs and i hate dubbing(that and i dont own a TV anymore though i do have access to one if needed).

    Its more than just the fact the TV shows are not broadcast in a region in a timely fashion or that they want an origional show when they want it .
    DVD-/+R/rw and CD-r/rw are far cheaper than comparitive vhs tapes , Having the show exactly when you want it without having to worry about setting the recorder (etc) is relaxing ,People hate adverts (20 minute shows that last 45 minutes due to 25 minutes of intersperced Crap for things that i do'nt need or want and am less likely to buy after being forced to view the tripe that they purvay) and finaly its just so dammed cool at the moment ( i ran out of good reasons).

    --
    The only things certain in war are Propaganda and Death. You can never be sure which is which though
  20. Re:Lost where? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    Why do Americans need to watch The Biggest Loser?
    They can just walk out the front door to see overweight idiots.

  21. No sympathy for Australian networks by xixax · · Score: 4, Informative

    SF television programs have never been treated seriously by the television stations here in Australia. Babylon 5 was initially shown *out* *of* *order* and the "Footy Show" would routinely displace following SF shows by up to half an hour because the show was running over time. When I was a kid, it took several summer holidays to *never* see the entire television adaptation of "The Tripods" because the station would just pull the series when regular programming returned. Even now, any SF series that do screen are on late at night, and delays of more than a season are common (i.e. Buffy, Ange, X-Files). This delay means the Internet is loaded with spoilers.

    For these reasons, we would originally get friends to send video tapes from the USA. For these reasons, a lot of people now use the file transfer technology du-jour (Napseter, BitTorrent, Direct Connect, whatever) to grab shows.

    As the networks have for a very long time shown that they do not value SF programming, they have absolutely no sympathy from me. If the shows had screened in a timely manner, not been relegated to graveyard slots and not been chopped and changed, people would have not bothered with all this effort and just watched live to air. And I'd get cable TV if it was any good, try getting a cable package that *doesn't* include sport and a bunch of other junk I don't want). If we got to keep SBS and ABC, I'd gladly sacrifice the lot to the FTA as I am bloody well sick of lifestyle and reality shows.

    --
    "Everything is adjustable, provided you have the right tools"
    1. Re:No sympathy for Australian networks by boldra · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You hit on one of the main issues here: spoilers. I just started watching BSG - downloaded via P2P because I'm in Germany. Now that I've finished watching the first series I can actually talk about the show with American friends and read American blogs. Previously I ran the risk of having the thing ruined because someone accidentally gave away a plot element. The Broadcasters need to realise that the "global village" is causing their products to depreciate if they keep them on the shelves. It's not so much that they're losing customers because of episode downloads, they're losing cusomters because of modern communications!

      --
      I've been posting on the net since 1994 and I still haven't come up with a good sig!
  22. The Real Heroes by michaeldot · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I think the real unsung heroes of this are the kind souls who actually do the capture and encoding, ready for the torrents to start flying about the world.

    Case in point: Doctor Who: The End of the World

    The most recent Doctor Who aired 7:00 pm Saturday night, UK time. By Sunday morning, Australian time, there were enough torrent seeds to have it a high quality 350MB DivX on my hard drive in less than an hour.

    Given the 11 hour time zone difference, that's a very quick turnaround, and a very professional piece of capture and encoding. I don't know who originally sourced it (not even an ugly watermark to quench his/her ego!), but my warm thanks to you. There's no sign of the local broadcaster acquiring it for at least the next 6 months.

  23. Complete non-surprise by trawg · · Score: 4, Informative

    This is a complete non-surprise to anyone in Australia that a) wants to watch TV and b) is aware of this Internet thingo and c) has heard of BitTorrent.

    Not only do we often have to wait months, if not years to actually GET a series (assuming its not exclusive to one of the cable TV services, which STILL aren't available in many areas), they often find ways to screw them up.

    Examples:

    - Season one of Scrubs was shown by one of the networks. Season two started - six episodes into the season, if I recall correctly.

    - Desperate Housewives just returned last night, after a three week break because there was something else on the networks wanted to cover

    When you can download the entire season (probably in HDTV) and watch it without ads and without having to wait weeks for the networks to get their shit together (and without having to pay AU$60/month on cable, if you can even get it, which I can't, whine!), its not surprising.

    (Add me to the list of people that would happily, ecstatically, and joyfully shell out money to buy fairly priced xvid/divx versions of US TV shows that I simply can't watch over here - shit, I'd probably then go and buy them on DVD as well)

  24. 3 things certain in life by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I'd gladly pay a feww dollars/month to download TV eps (sans commericals)

    There are at least three things certain in life:
    1. Death
    2. Taxes
    3. COMMERCIALS

    When cable TV was beginning to offer premium channels in the U.S. the expectation was that since you were paying for the channels, you wouldn't have to watch commercials.

    That didn't last.

    Now, commercials are even being shown in many movie theaters in the U.S. The commercials are shown during the time advertised as the start of the movie, so it's not like you only see them if you're early to a show.

    I'm not surprised one bit that people are retaliating against the sensory overload of obnoxious product propaganda, both in TV and in the cinema.
    1. Re:3 things certain in life by azrebb · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Cinemas in Australia have had commercials at the start of the session since I've been going (15+ years). To be honest, I don't mind as much as tv commercials as you only see them at the start of the movie and normally they're those fancy ones that companies have paid ludicous amounts of money to some marketing firm to make something a)funny b)intelligent c)full of hot scantily clad women or d)all of the above.

  25. No bloody wonder! by askegg · · Score: 3, Informative

    The reason we download TV shows here is simple - the networks don't have their shit together!

    The world according to Networks Australia:

    The TV guides are just that - a rough guide to what we think we might be airing, but don't take it as gospel, we will alter it at a moments notice and air your favorite programs at 3 in the morning when we suddenly discover every other crap has been played 4 times already.

    When we do play a season, we will constantly move its time slot and play them back to back to finish it when the footy season starts.

    Once we discover a program that earns good ratings we will repeat it at every opportunity and buy all the spins offs and flog them to death until you are sick of it. See CSI as a good example.

    We will try new program material at 11pm when nobody is watching. When it starts to build a following we will move it to 4:15am every time the planets align. When you find it again we'll axe it citing poor ratings.


    I am sick of trying to find my favorite programs (what the fuck happened to West Wing?) and decided to download them and watch them whenever I have the time or inclination. (side note - we have Tivo type technology that will automatically record shows I like whenever they are on - dammit).

    Stop bitching about the customer and give them what they want!

    --
    I don't make predictions, and I never will.
  26. What was I thinking? by ockegheim · · Score: 3, Funny

    I've been ordering DVDs of my favourite shows on Amazon. This is technically illegal and costs me money. Pshaw!

    --
    I’m old enough to remember 16K of memory being described as “whopping”
  27. We're A Nation of Backups by planet-sloop · · Score: 5, Funny

    We don't download them to watch. As part of the free trade agreement between the US and Australia, we are providing you with off-shore storage in case of disaster.

    Its all about disaster recovery these days and being the caring nation, we're just trying to do our part.

  28. It's an illusion by johnw · · Score: 4, Funny
    it takes an average of four months to watch the latest episodes of top-rated shows like Lost and Desperate Housewives

    No, no, no. It just seems like four months when you're watching it.