Slashdot Mirror


Major Aussie ISP Disconnecting Trojaned PCs

daria42 writes "Australia's largest ISP, Telstra BigPond, has started disconnecting customers that it suspects have excess traffic-causing trojans installed on their PCs. The trojans have been flooding BigPond's DNS servers and causing extremely slow DNS requests for around a month now. Despite nightly additions of DNS servers, BigPond appears to be unable to cope with the extra traffic on its network." Note that the article says the disconnections are temporary and accompanied by communication with the affected customers, not just a big yanking-of-carpet.

58 of 388 comments (clear)

  1. My 1st Thoughts by reezle · · Score: 5, Insightful

    "Thank God"

    "It's about Time"

    "Glad somebody is finally taking an interesting in keeping the neighborhood cleaned up"

    "Oh crap, is this the first chink in the armor, ISP's can disconnect people based on their traffic... Virus, Trojan, P2P, Torrent"

    1. Re:My 1st Thoughts by Unipuma · · Score: 3, Insightful
      "Oh crap, is this the first chink in the armor, ISP's can disconnect people based on their traffic... Virus, Trojan, P2P, Torrent"

      Fortunately, they can yank the plug because these machines are attacking their DNS servers. Not because these computers are just sending out a lot of DNS requests.
    2. Re:My 1st Thoughts by TeraCo · · Score: 4, Insightful
      ISP's can disconnect people based on their traffic

      They've always been able to do that.

      --
      Not Meta-modding due to apathy.
    3. Re:My 1st Thoughts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting
      "Oh crap, is this the first chink in the armor, ISP's can disconnect people based on their traffic... Virus, Trojan, P2P, Torrent"
      I can agree with you on the first 3 statements, but that last is just crap.
      Why the fuck should an ISP want to disconnect a user because of his P2P or Torrent uses? If the ISP can't cope with the amount of data flowing through, it shouldn't disconnect a user. If I pay for a 2mbit DSL with no limitations to usage, I want a 2mbit DSL with no limitations. My ISP shouldn't fucking cut off my internet access. Besides, P2P and Torrent can actually be used for something useful. The last 10 times I've used bittorrent, it was for downloading WoW updates and Gentoo and Debian ISOs.
      Yes, I know that some people will call me naive, and I DO know that not everyone uses P2P and torrent for these purposes, but that shouldn't change the fact that the ISP shouldn't disconnect a user depending on how he uses his connection as long as he pays for it.
    4. Re:My 1st Thoughts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      "Oh crap, is this the first chink in the armor, ISP's can disconnect people based on their traffic... Virus, Trojan, P2P, Torrent"

      Yeah, that's a valid concern. I think what we are talking about here is the difference between being pragmatic and idealistic.

      Idealistically, the ISP would never look at your traffic, and just deliver the pipe. Practically, zombies are degrading the service of other customers significantly, and the ISP is going to know what the problem is.

      It's not a perfect Internet yet, we all know that, so I think it's pretty reasonable that certain measures are taken in cases like this.

      Just remember to scream really loud when there is an incident of an ISP disconnecting you for something that is perfectly legal.

      (PS. It's good to see that the use of Torrents appears to have a high legal/questionable content ratio, whereas the last time I looked at P2P, it was really hard to argue that it wasn't used mainly for illegally copying stuff)

    5. Re:My 1st Thoughts by spongman · · Score: 4, Insightful

      ISPs don't want to be liable for the shit your sending over their network. As soon as they start sniffing they make themselves responsible for your kiddy porn and your copyright infringements. They don't know, and that's what they tell the lawyers, they don't want to know and more importantly they don't want to have to know. just don't piss them off and you'll be fine.

    6. Re:My 1st Thoughts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      sorry but ISP's can disconnect you for ANY reason. if you though differently you should have read that customer agreement..

      when I was running an ISP I had many clauses for termination and had to use them on rare occasion.

      If you think an ISP did not have this ability you are horribly niave.

    7. Re:My 1st Thoughts by jotok · · Score: 3, Interesting

      It seemed like the customers are being ganked not because there was way too much "legitimate" traffic to handle, but because it was becoming a nuisance. The legitimacy of p2p applications is arguable so long as they have legal uses; the legitimacy of gaobot is not arguable as it has no legal uses on a public network.

    8. Re:My 1st Thoughts by Squiddl3 · · Score: 3, Informative

      most likely he was reffering to the law in germany, that every logged connection data must be either anonymized (for technical logs) or must be needed for accounting procedures (but maximum is AFAIK 3 months).
      With a flatrate there is no such thing as "need for accounting", so the ISP isn't allowed to make logs, which are personalized.

      so the original poster most likely meant , if they can't have personalized logs, they ca n't shut you down.

  2. Why is this news!?! by pctainto · · Score: 4, Informative

    ISPs around the world have been doing this for a while now! I live in a house with 12 people and one person had a hijacked computer sending out mail and Adelphia cut us off. Although they never told us that they did (a quick call to customer support hooked us back up).

    Seriously, why is this news?

    --
    I think my principles are reachin' an all time low
    1. Re:Why is this news!?! by Yrd · · Score: 4, Informative

      And? NTL are one of the biggest ISPs in the UK and they do the same thing.

      --
      Miri it is whil Linux ilast...
    2. Re:Why is this news!?! by SQL+Error · · Score: 3, Funny

      The French overthrew their monarchy some years back.

      Yeah, in 1792, but in a typically French fashion, they had to do it again in 1814, then in 1815, once more in 1830, and yet again in 1848 and then several times during the 1870's.

      Then they tried to bring it back in 1946, but no-one could agree on who got to be King, so they ended up with President de Gaulle...

    3. Re:Why is this news!?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Here's what my ISP (Finnish PHNet) does when they detect a trojaned machine (all URLs you type into the browser give you this page):

      http://img56.echo.cx/my.php?image=phnetspamprotect 13vb.jpg

      You are also allowed access to another page with more details:

      http://img56.echo.cx/my.php?image=phnetspamprotect 05zy.jpg

    4. Re:Why is this news!?! by MyLongNickName · · Score: 5, Funny

      Then the French started outsourcing that "monarch overthrowing" job to the Germans.

      --
      See my journal for slashdot ID's by year. Mine created in 2005. http://slashdot.org/journal/289875/slashdot-ids-by-year
  3. This is a good thing by kasperd · · Score: 5, Insightful

    More ISPs should handle compromised computers this way. Just leaving them around to harm the internet for the rest of is is irresponsible.

    --

    Do you care about the security of your wireless mouse?
    1. Re:This is a good thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      If you don't disconect the offending computer, how will the idiot who owns it know they've been an idiot? Disconecting it totally is a great way to handle the problem, because it forces the idiot to call customer services to find out why their connection no longer works, at which point you can lart them for being an idiot and force them to clean up their idiot-box before you reconnect them. Just silently droping the offending packets does nothing to educate the idiot involved.

    2. Re:This is a good thing by R.Caley · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Well, there is no need to *disconnect* the computer if all you have to do is block the problematic port.

      I think for 99.9999% of a residential ISP's customers, having their access to DNS blocked would not be noticably different from disconnection.

      Besides, is someone has an infected PC, disconnection is a friendly action. It kicks them up the arse so they have to find out what is going on, and it prevents them being zombied.

      We have a collective problem that many many people have PCs on the internet but don't have the kind of basic understanding we demand before we'd allow them onto the road in a car. Sending them back to the garage for a day or two with a hint to learn what the windscreen wipers are for is good for everyone.

      --
      _O_
      .|<
      The named which can be named is not the true named
    3. Re:This is a good thing by KiloByte · · Score: 5, Interesting

      block problematic port

      It's not that simple. The attack in question was done by a flood of DNS queries -- you're not really going to cut off port 53, as this is pretty much equal to knocking that person off the Net.

      The typical case involves a lot of outgoing connections on port 25 -- you can't really block this as well unless the user in question uses nothing but webmail.

      Traffic shaping won't help a lot, either -- it can protect the server, of course, but won't help the user himself. In this case, it will just make their legitimate use prohibitely slow -- their web browser/whatever will compete with the virus they have over the tiny allotted quota of allowed DNS queries.

      IMO it's much better to just cut them off outright, telling them that the fault is on their side.

      If you want to be nice, you can redirect all their traffic to a web server which gives them a nice idiot-proof message about what they need to do. This is what I've set up for a friend's basement ISP (~30 paying users) -- although in that case, the message was similar to "your payment is due for two months, you didn't heed our reminders".

      --
      The creatures outside looked from Alt-Right to Antifa; but already it was impossible to say which was which.
    4. Re:This is a good thing by Dulcise · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I think isp's should do what ntl did during the ms blaster worm out break, which is only allow the user to connect to ether the removal tool or a page that contains a link to it and how to use it. it would take more work, but its better for the customer.

    5. Re:This is a good thing by mwvdlee · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Then again; all the windscreen wipers in the world couldn't stop a group of thugs from spraypainting your windscreen; you'd need lengthy and expensive training in self defense and chemical paint removal.

      You just assume that the people will suffice by installing (purchasing?) some equivalent to a windscreen wiper such as antivirus software but that won't be enough for the really nasty ones.

      Since the ISP can apparenty distinguish between good and bad traffic, can't they filter out any traffic which contains the troyans? They are assuming their non-IT clients can.

      --
      Slashdot social media options: AIM, ICQ, Yahoo, Jabber and Mobile Text. Why no MySpace?
    6. Re:This is a good thing by rabbit994 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Nothing stopping you from a setting up a local DNS server. We had issues with Comcast DNS until we simply set up our own.

    7. Re:This is a good thing by R.Caley · · Score: 3, Insightful
      You just assume that the people will suffice by installing (purchasing?) some equivalent to a windscreen wiper such as antivirus software but that won't be enough for the really nasty ones.

      If someone targets you for a sophisticated attack, you are probably not a normal internet user (eg you're commercial or a political site or something), you need professional IT support and shouldn't be using a normal retail ISP.

      Th threat to normal customers is generic worms and trojans and so on. Things which the basic security everyone should be usig will protect against. Just the equivalnt of using windscreen wipers when it is raining.

      IIRC my ISP supplies some kind of firewall/antivirus package for all customers. (I've had my connection since before this kind of thing became really necessary and don't connect from Windows, so I've never investigated what they are offerring). I can't imagine why any ISP would not do that -- the saving in customer support calls alone would more than pay for it.

      --
      _O_
      .|<
      The named which can be named is not the true named
    8. Re:This is a good thing by FireFury03 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Disconecting it totally is a great way to handle the problem, because it forces the idiot to call customer services to find out why their connection no longer works

      Even better is to block all access and redirect web requests to a server that explains what's going on and provides patches, etc. That way people (with more than one brain cell) don't _have_ to phone customer support.

    9. Re:This is a good thing by sadler121 · · Score: 3, Informative

      I think for 99.9999% of a residential ISP's customers, having their access to DNS blocked would not be noticably different from disconnection.

      Have you BEEN on the Comcast forums recently? Comcast is having a lOT of trouble with their DNS servers and it is effecting EVERYBODY.

      Last week when it happened I just switched my DNS addresses to MIT's, (though now I have a nice list of addy's just in case MIT's goes down). I have been instructing my friends on how to change the default DNS listings because they are being effected themselves. Once they change them, they have no problems. Hell, I didn't even know Comcast was having problems AGIAN yesterday because I just kept system with the MIT addy's.

      I have to think that if trojans are effectivly DDOSing Comcast's servers, if there is not some ultior motive behind this. DNS servers are the life blood of the Internet, to take them down means we would all have to know numbers to get around the Internet, and while I keep a few IP addy's in my bookmarks just in case, to except joe user to is rediculus.

      Of course it is probably just Comcast, who, as a regulated monopoly, has no incentive to upgrade services, because for many, Cable Internet is the only "broadband" (HA!) available. I would wouldn't be surprised if rates go up agian to cover the cost of whatever "upgrade" Comcast comes up with to solve this problem.

      Until then I am keeping my DNS addresses pointed to MIT's servers and I am NOT going to be using Comcasts.

  4. Hmm... makes sense to me! by PDA_Boy · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Despite nightly additions of DNS servers, BigPond appears to be unable to cope with the extra traffic on its network."

    Right- I can smell a cake burning. Let's add more flour! Come on- more flour!

    Oh- right- let's take the cake out the oven...

    Seems a sensible thing to do to me- tackle the computers causing the problems, rather than trying to react to the problem itself.

    Although, tackling the writers of the infecting programs would be good too, if somewhat harder.
    1. Re:Hmm... makes sense to me! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Umm... when the customer cannot connect to the
      internet, what do you think happens next?

      They call the ISP on the phone.

      And they are told to clean their computer.

      And the computer either gets cleaned,
      or they remain off the internet.

      Your cake analogy is flawed. Instead, think
      of an analogy involving quarantine, computers,
      viruses, ISPs and such. Wait. Instead of
      an analogy, why not just reason about what's
      going on in this situation.

      What confusion of facts lets you believe that
      quarantine is not addressing the infection
      directly? It UNAVOIDABLY causes the customer
      to fix the infection, or cease to piss in
      the public internet pool.

  5. Drastic Measures by onosendai · · Score: 5, Interesting

    These are drastic measures, but given the average BigPond user is much less a geek than anyone frequenting these parts, this will probably be the first time that most of these users will know about it, and given BigPond's previous problems with mail-servers, perhaps they're striking before the problem gets too out of hand.

    Although I don't understand the purpose of a trojaned machine repeatedly hitting a DNS server, is this an attempt to cause an overflow and therefore making the DNS server itself vulnerable?

    --
    <? include ('signature.inc'); ?>
    1. Re:Drastic Measures by Arghdee · · Score: 5, Informative

      To expand on this, a lot of you non-australians should probably know that Telstra Bigpond is the ISP that people choose when they don't know any better.

      Value for money wise they rate very poorly compared to the opposition - for ADSL at least.

      For those of you that don't know, Telstra is a part government owned company, which owns much of the telco infrastructure in Australia. They like to make life difficult for any competitors.

      Also one of the few ISPs in Australia that charges traffic in both directions.

      Just in case you guys care :)

  6. Mathematically... by Shag · · Score: 5, Funny

    if BIGNUM% of PC's are malware-infested (I've heard 80% tossed around) and they get disconnected, suddenly anyone who's looking at their web logs will think that an unusually high number of Big Pond users are on Linux boxen, Macs, etc.

    If more ISPs did this, maybe we'd see a decline in sites that only work in MSIE...

    --
    Village idiot in some extremely smart villages.
  7. Good idea to me by Rainwulf · · Score: 5, Interesting

    i think this is a good idea as well. I work in technical support, and the amount of infected machines i have to deal with is just phenomenal. Cutting of the machines access to internet both fixes the problem. The customer goes "WTF" and i say.. yea your machine is infected. Either install nix or go to a computer store. However its open to abuse... define excessive traffic.. and what traffic is malware or legitimate traffic. However... since a good 90 percent of spam comes from infected machines as well (go windows you good thing go) its all thumbs up from me.

    1. Re:Good idea to me by asliarun · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I agree with you. This IS a big problem for ISPs. However, i feel that the solution is not to pass the buck onto the customers. You can't realistically expect Joe SixPack, who doesn't know the difference between the CD tray and a coffee cup holder, to keep his computer up to date with the latest service pack or patch.

      A better alternative for the ISPs, IMHO, would be to start behaving like the network administration team in a big company. Joe Sixpack would be better off if the ISP would install a centrally adminsitered system administration client on his machine that automatically scans and deploys the latest anti-virus program. I know that computer-savvy folks wouldn't like to give this much of control of their PCs to ISPs. However, for Joe, this would be the ideal hassle-free solution. With a proper security policy, privacy concerns would also not be an issue.

      The ISP could also have an opt-out policy that non-clueless people could make use of.

      Does this make sense?

  8. Waste of time? by www.sorehands.com · · Score: 5, Interesting
    They should at least make a phone call to the party so they don't waste time trying to figure out the problem.

    Not all people pick up the phone and tolerate the script. Some people actually try to diagnose the problem first.


    Most ISPs have language in their terms of service that permits this action. It is a shame that an ISP need to have their services almost knocked out before taking action.

    I'd like to see some ISPs that ignore trojaned machines or support spammers get sued by other customers when their IP blocks end up on block lists.

    1. Re:Waste of time? by Raumkraut · · Score: 3, Informative

      I was 'disconnected' from my ADSL a while back, not because any of my machines were infected, but because I'd tried scanning my company's IP.
      My ISP had detected traffic on port 135 (some Windows thing exploited by malware), and automatically stopped forwarding any connections to or from my home machines. The only port which was allowed was port 80, and every web page request was redirected to a help page explaining what had happened. :)

      After blocking port 135 at my router, all it took was clicking a link on the aforementioned web page, and my connection was restored automagically.

      Rather well implemented, I thought.

  9. Plusnet has a better way. by Zeussy · · Score: 5, Informative

    My isp (plus.net) monitors any communications on port 135 etc and if it dedicates any when your connected. You get redirected to a Plus.net you may have been effected with MSBlast page etc. And give you the links to tools to fix it.

    Very handy indeed.

  10. All ISPs should be doing this. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    All of these infected Windows boxes are killing the net. If ISPs would simply yank them as they show signs of infection (trojan, worms, etc) UNTIL the customers can demonstrate that they have taken care of problems, then things would be a lot easier.

  11. Catch-22 by Mr_Silver · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Of course, once you have no net connection, it becomes a little difficult to download all the latest Microsoft patches and virus updates to clean your machine so you can get back on the internet.

    Thats not to say it isn't impossible, but it wouldn't surprise me that taking a laptop/ipod/some other storage device big enough around to another friends house and getting all the updates is going to be beyond most people.

    Also, last time I checked, I can't download all the updates that have been developed after XP SP2 was released from a machine running Windows 2000.

    (side note: I'm on a 56k modem at home and therefore don't have a spare 3 weeks to get the several hundred megabytes of updates - and autopatcher xp hasn't been updated after sp2 was released)

    --
    Avantslash - View Slashdot cleanly on your mobile phone.
  12. Nothing new by Rob+Kaper · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Dutch ISP Xs4All has been doing this for months/years, blocking all traffic (most notably SMTP) minus SSH and access to their HTTP proxy.

  13. How will the user tell the difference? by aussie_a · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Lucky they're ringing up the user, because otherwise the user will just assume that they've been disconnected. Yet again. Bigpond is terrible with keeping it's users online (I'm talking broadband here), and believe that two to three disonnects per day is perfectly fine, even when those disconnects last for an hour or more.

    I can see it now:
    Customer: My broadband is down again.
    Bigpond: Oh, I see. Well from time to time this does happen for a brief moment...
    Customer: It's been down all day, and it's happened every day this week.
    Bigpond: I see.. What's your account *clickety* Oh yes, we've marked you as a computer with a trojan. Please do a virus scan and call us back, if it comes back negative we'll re-connect you.

    I'd go with someone else but they're the only broadband provider for my area. And I live in Sydney (the suburbs, an hour from the city itself)

  14. Just traffic? Or trojan traffic? by SlashDread · · Score: 4, Informative

    Look, I ALL for ISP's disconnecting "polluting" PC's. They just better make damn sure its not legit traffic.

    My ISP does exactly this, if it suspects trojan traffic it shuts you down (and snail mail you). You subsequently call the helpdesk, they ask what you did to resolve the matters (The ISP provides FREE anti-virus and firewall software). If they rae happy with your counter measures, theyll reconnect you in a jiffy.
    If you can explain you have a legit reason to hit DNS 9765 times per second, I suspect they'll unlock you too.

    I love it.

  15. Slow response times? by Stephen+Samuel · · Score: 4, Insightful
    One problem with this is that many ISPs are days (or even weeks) behind on responding to complaints. I have a script which automates the process of generating SPAM and virus complaints. In the cases where I've actually gotten a real-live response, it's almost invariably been days after my complaint. (It's only the smallest ISPs that seem to have a fast response time.) In the menatime, these machines have been spewing spam and viruses across the 'net.

    If Telestra is like any other large ISP I've seen, I figure that the first thing they should do is hire (or allocate) a good gaggle of AUP investigators so that their intelligence on this problem is reasonably real-time.

    They could also write some scripts to log and categorize the DNS queries that they're getting from their customers. It should be fairly easy to automatically identify the worst offenders. You could then send notes to their owners, and if there's no reasonable response, pull the plug. Over the last few years, I think that I've written scripts to do pretty much everything but the last step, so I know it's doable. (that last step should almost always be manual).

    --
    Free Software: Like love, it grows best when given away.
  16. Other ISPs block ports in order to reduce threats by goonerw · · Score: 3, Informative

    Aussie ISP Internode (one of the better alternatives to BigPond) deliberately block various types of malware (usually port blocking but other means have been employed such as IP blocking a client's IP) and an advisory is placed on the service status page indicating what is blocked and for how long.

    --
    LOAD ".SIG"
    PRESS PLAY ON TAPE
  17. My permanent boycott of Telstra by petrus4 · · Score: 4, Informative

    Attempting to strangle ADSL adoption, killing the national BBS community when the Internet first became mainstream in Australia in order to force adoption of Big Pond, and a host of other offenses meant that after an extended period of shopping around, I finally stopped using Telstra as a carrier completely last year, and they can now consider themselves permanently boycotted as far as I'm concerned. They are one of the most short-sighted, destructive, and generally amoral corporations I've heard of. They were also vocally criticised by Bill Gates during one of his visits here, for their strangulation of broadband adoption.

    Apart from the above, to some degree there are now price incentives to use other carriers as well, particularly for voice. If you've got a credit card, you also might want to check out TPG for ADSL...they probably have the best deals I've seen.

  18. NTL by bcmm · · Score: 4, Insightful

    NTL (UK cable provider) does this. They once started redirecting all HTTP requests from our home network to a page saying "You have netsky. Download this." or something. I had to try this with the Linux box before I believed this wasn't an attempt to distribute malware. Thing is, I checked all the Windows machines with NTL's tool and with Sophos AV, and they were all clean.

    Other people with this problem have speculated that Linux machines (which NTL allows but "doesn't support") are sometimes mis-detected as Netsky-infected Windows PCs.

    The moral is, if this sort of thing is going to become widespread, they need good detection of many different types of network usage, and they need to tell them by phone instead of just giving them what looks like a default-homepage highjack.

    In a similar vein, remember MS marking VNC as spyware? Imagine if an ISP starts taking down VNC servers for the users own security, etc, etc.

    --
    # cat /dev/mem | strings | grep -i llama
    Damn, my RAM is full of llamas.
  19. Re:Potential boon for alternative OSes by grolschie · · Score: 4, Informative

    Except on most Linux dists:
    1). the default user is not an administrator
    2). 99.9% of malware cannot run. If it did, then it'd cause minimal damage (see 1.)
    3). There is no ActiveX
    4). etc, etc, etc

    The average Linux (non root) user can be as clueless as he/she likes and won't get into trouble.

  20. sick are put in quarantaine net (on this uni) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    When computers here (utwente.nl) are infected it is usually automatically detected, resulting in every webrequest going to "you're in quarantaine, you can download clean-up tools HERE, and when you're clean send us a message HERE. apart from that you can connect to nothing." If you're interested, it's run by the guys from http://snt.student.utwente.nl

  21. Pretty Standard by jchawk · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I'm surprised it's taken them this long. When one of our customers gets infected with a virus / open proxy / etc... We *gasp* pay attention, shutdown their connection and immediately contact them and help them fix the problem.

    It's amazing how quickly you can get your network under control doing this. And 9 times out of 10 the end user is greatful that you were willing to work with them to help them correct the problem.

    Fixing infected machines on your network only makes the network a better place for everyone using it.

  22. Not So Fast, Sonny Jim by SQL+Error · · Score: 4, Funny

    I work for a phone company here in Oz, and among other things we resell Telstra ADSL.

    I've seen Telstra claim that a customer on a 512/128 line (512kb/s down, 128kb/s up) uploaded 4GB in 20 hours. When I pointed out that this was impossible, they suggested that maybe the user's computer had been infected by a virus - and insisted that I check this before they would investigate.

    I then spent some time explaining the concept of arithmetic to the Telstra support desk...

  23. Best Practice by MrNonchalant · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Send the effected customers (better yet, all customers) a CD with a free anti-virus, free anti-spyware, a free firewall, an alternative browser, and the latest updates for all of the above plus Windows and Office (including support for ME, NT, 2000, 98 SE, 98, and 95). With it include a letter explaining courtiously and simply why security is important. Sure, you'd probably have to get permission from a dozen different legal departments to do distribution of nominally free software on a wide scale like that, but some companies I know would jump at having their demo version shipped.

    Back this up with your regular tech support. Yes, some users will be too clueless but a good deal won't. A fair percentage of the clueless ones will catch on quickly when their internet gets shut off and stays off. I can guarentee you the network traffic they'd get would drop to a third of the levels seen before.

    Actually, in this perspective AOL's lackluster virus and spyware protection make perfect sense.

  24. Not really by Craig+Ringer · · Score: 4, Informative

    With most such set-ups your Internet connection is generally not totally blocked, just severely restricted. Any web request gets proxy-redirected to a page with instructions on how to clean your machine up, and download links from the ISPs local mirrors. Anything else is locked down.

    I don't know if this is what bigpond are doing, but that's the usual way to handle this and it seems to work extremely well. My ISP uses a similar trick when users go over quota.

  25. How acquire spyware removal tools if disconnected? by matt+me · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I don't think the ISPs quite thought this plan though. Users aren't going to be able clean up their computers without tools such as ad-aware and spybot search & destroy. These ppl probably don't even have a virus checker at all. The necessary software is freely avaliable online, but without a net connection these ppl will have to buy $100 of stuff at PC World. And that'll need updating online anyway.

    A better idea would be to restrict bandwidth and connections on infected computers. The ISP should also post everyone they disconnect a CD with the usual free tools and instructions on how to use them. Along with Firefox and Thunderbird, of course.

    I agree though, action should be taken against owners of zombie computers. They're irresponsibly spoiling the internet for others. Such users who think 'Internet Explorer' is the internet and believe the internet = the web.

    While such ignorant users should be allowed to run computers in private, once they're connected to the internet, they become a danger to everyone else. The way I see it, I'm not allowed to drive a car on the road without first taking a test to make sure I can use it safely, and recognise and repair common problems (or at least take the car to the garage). This requires knowledge of both how the mechanics of the engine work, and of the highway code. So why are people who have never even seen the inside of computer and don't realise that connecting an unpatched WinXP box to broadband is as dangerous as speeding down a motorway in the opposite direction to all traffic, allowed to do exactly that?

  26. That's nothing by themusicgod1 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Here at the University of Regina my roommate MachinationX had gotten a virus on his WinXP box (why didn't he have antivirus software?! he's an IT consultant!! but I digress) So our ISP (U of R computing services) not only disconnected him from the network, but refused to let him back on the network unless he agreed to give them his computer and let *them* run an antivirus scan on it , after which it would be returned. I happened to have some of my old backups on his machine at the time, but the point is that our ISP can not only watch your internet traffic(as they have been), but if you "get a virus" they can disconnect you and demand they have access to all your personal files at will.

    Blows my mind.

    --
    GENERATION 26: The first time you see this, copy it into your sig on any forum and add 1 to the generation.
  27. My ISP does this regularly by tmk · · Score: 3, Informative

    My ISP Netcologne disconnects PCs that are infected with trojans and try to infect others. The connection is interrupted and when the costumer tries to connect again he can only access one page, that shows an information. He can download Antivir there, too.

    There are two restrictions: Netcologne certainly does not monitor all traffic - they react on abuse-messages. And this "service" is not available to business costumers.

  28. Routine? by Kumochisonan · · Score: 3, Insightful

    My Employer, a large national Cable ISP in Britain routinely suspends service to customers due to nasties on the unsuspecting users PC. Our infrastructure runs daily scripts that scan for open mail proxies and other suspicious ports that may be open. It's just part of the normal security process.

    However it never used to be, this aggressive step of securing our network was prompted by the ISP being threatened with a Usenet Death Penalty, twice.

    Whether this BigPond story is any different (Because it deals with Trojans rather than mail relays) is another matter...

    --
    kill elrond
    take elrond
    put elrond in cupboard
  29. This is certainly within precedent by smchris · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Amateur radio operators, for example, have a responsibility to make sure their equipment is working properly, properly tuned, and operated without malicious intent so that it doesn't interfere with others.

  30. (Uni computing services) != (commercial ISP) by sczimme · · Score: 4, Insightful

    So our ISP (U of R computing services) not only disconnected him from the network,

    So you get your Internet feed through Uni computing services - noted.

    but refused to let him back on the network unless he agreed to give them his computer and let *them* run an antivirus scan on it , after which it would be returned.

    That's actually not a bad idea. They want to be sure that the system in question is no longer a problem. I'm sure you can see where a user would have motivation to lie about the scan if it would get him back on the network.

    but the point is that our ISP can not only watch your internet traffic(as they have been), but if you "get a virus" they can disconnect you and demand they have access to all your personal files at will.

    Blows my mind.


    Re: watching traffic, disconnecting users - re-read the Terms of Service you signed when you accepted their Internet access; I suspect you will find they've had these capabilities all along.

    However, your comment about demand... access to all your personal files at will is completely ridiculous.

    First, computing services will only need to examine your PC if it causing a problem for other users; if things have gotten to this point you are either unable or unwilling to maintain the machine yourself and have effectively abdicated this responsibility.

    Second, you probably already gave them permission to require such a scan when you agreed to the ToS (see above).

    Third, who says your personal files have to remain on the machine if/when you turn it in for virus scanning?? Your roommate was told to deliver the computer; he can sanitize it before he does so. (This should be obvious.)
    The University is not a commercial ISP. They provide the Internet access as a tool for you to use to further your education. It is a shared resource, and if you are causing problems they can rectify said problems as necessary based on the ToS. If you don't like their ToS you are free to go back to dial-up or pay for a T1.

    --
    I want to drag this out as long as possible. Bring me my protractor.
  31. Re:Last email they got by Eyeball97 · · Score: 3, Insightful
    1. LOL. Okay it is funny, but...

    2. If they had any smarts at all, they'd still allow the client access to a whitelist of sites - windowsupdate, symantec, etc, as well as allowing them access to their own web/ftp sites to download fixes. If they don't, they're only doing a half-ass job of helping to fix the problem.

  32. Ah... this is unusual? by jidar · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I've worked for 3 ISP's in the midwest, and all of them have had no tolerance policies that allowed them to cut the customer off at the first sign of spam, trojan or virus activity. I personally have cut off dozens of accounts this way, and why not? People are responsible for their own machines, asking them to keep them cleaned up isn't unreasonable in my opinion. In fact, asking us to keep supplying service to them while their rogue systems flood the net with crap is a lot more unreasonable than that imo. This isn't like their bill is a day late or something, this is an active malicious atttack on the network, of course we aren't going to let it go on regardless of whether the customer is home to pick up the phone when we detect it. That's how it should be.

    --
    Sigs are awesome huh?
  33. Shut up by Hrothgar+The+Great · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I really hate you "WHY IS THIS NEWS?!!!!" crybabies. It's news because this particular ISP is doing something which it previously was not. See how that works? Something HAPPENS, and then someone REPORTS that it happened, and then the story gets posted here because its subject matter appeals to a large portion of this site's readership. Are you so blindingly stupid as to actually need this explained to you? It's the fucking dictionary definition of news.

    By the way, most ISPs still are NOT doing this. Time Warner's Road Runner, for instance, never even looks in the direction of a trojaned machine on their network - at least in my area.