Slashdot Mirror


Major Aussie ISP Disconnecting Trojaned PCs

daria42 writes "Australia's largest ISP, Telstra BigPond, has started disconnecting customers that it suspects have excess traffic-causing trojans installed on their PCs. The trojans have been flooding BigPond's DNS servers and causing extremely slow DNS requests for around a month now. Despite nightly additions of DNS servers, BigPond appears to be unable to cope with the extra traffic on its network." Note that the article says the disconnections are temporary and accompanied by communication with the affected customers, not just a big yanking-of-carpet.

100 of 388 comments (clear)

  1. My 1st Thoughts by reezle · · Score: 5, Insightful

    "Thank God"

    "It's about Time"

    "Glad somebody is finally taking an interesting in keeping the neighborhood cleaned up"

    "Oh crap, is this the first chink in the armor, ISP's can disconnect people based on their traffic... Virus, Trojan, P2P, Torrent"

    1. Re:My 1st Thoughts by Unipuma · · Score: 3, Insightful
      "Oh crap, is this the first chink in the armor, ISP's can disconnect people based on their traffic... Virus, Trojan, P2P, Torrent"

      Fortunately, they can yank the plug because these machines are attacking their DNS servers. Not because these computers are just sending out a lot of DNS requests.
    2. Re:My 1st Thoughts by TeraCo · · Score: 4, Insightful
      ISP's can disconnect people based on their traffic

      They've always been able to do that.

      --
      Not Meta-modding due to apathy.
    3. Re:My 1st Thoughts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting
      "Oh crap, is this the first chink in the armor, ISP's can disconnect people based on their traffic... Virus, Trojan, P2P, Torrent"
      I can agree with you on the first 3 statements, but that last is just crap.
      Why the fuck should an ISP want to disconnect a user because of his P2P or Torrent uses? If the ISP can't cope with the amount of data flowing through, it shouldn't disconnect a user. If I pay for a 2mbit DSL with no limitations to usage, I want a 2mbit DSL with no limitations. My ISP shouldn't fucking cut off my internet access. Besides, P2P and Torrent can actually be used for something useful. The last 10 times I've used bittorrent, it was for downloading WoW updates and Gentoo and Debian ISOs.
      Yes, I know that some people will call me naive, and I DO know that not everyone uses P2P and torrent for these purposes, but that shouldn't change the fact that the ISP shouldn't disconnect a user depending on how he uses his connection as long as he pays for it.
    4. Re:My 1st Thoughts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      "Oh crap, is this the first chink in the armor, ISP's can disconnect people based on their traffic... Virus, Trojan, P2P, Torrent"

      Yeah, that's a valid concern. I think what we are talking about here is the difference between being pragmatic and idealistic.

      Idealistically, the ISP would never look at your traffic, and just deliver the pipe. Practically, zombies are degrading the service of other customers significantly, and the ISP is going to know what the problem is.

      It's not a perfect Internet yet, we all know that, so I think it's pretty reasonable that certain measures are taken in cases like this.

      Just remember to scream really loud when there is an incident of an ISP disconnecting you for something that is perfectly legal.

      (PS. It's good to see that the use of Torrents appears to have a high legal/questionable content ratio, whereas the last time I looked at P2P, it was really hard to argue that it wasn't used mainly for illegally copying stuff)

    5. Re:My 1st Thoughts by carl0ski · · Score: 2, Insightful

      the trojans are causing excessive DNS request or Worse Attacking local DNS service. I applaud Bigpond for this Australia's internatioonal link/User ratio is very poor compared to most other continents. And this protect me you everyone from lazy/stupid buggers who won't go to the effort to remove malicious programs from their computers. Contributing to spam, DOS attacks remote hacking gateways etc which any of us can be the victim!!

    6. Re:My 1st Thoughts by Threni · · Score: 2, Insightful

      What does `flatrate` have to do with anything. The OP was saying that ISPs can disconnect based on what you download, not how much. You try posting death-threats to people, hosting a child porn site (or just downloading it, come to that) and see where your `free speech`, `flat rate`, `I'm a paying customer` etc chat gets you!

    7. Re:My 1st Thoughts by spongman · · Score: 4, Insightful

      ISPs don't want to be liable for the shit your sending over their network. As soon as they start sniffing they make themselves responsible for your kiddy porn and your copyright infringements. They don't know, and that's what they tell the lawyers, they don't want to know and more importantly they don't want to have to know. just don't piss them off and you'll be fine.

    8. Re:My 1st Thoughts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      sorry but ISP's can disconnect you for ANY reason. if you though differently you should have read that customer agreement..

      when I was running an ISP I had many clauses for termination and had to use them on rare occasion.

      If you think an ISP did not have this ability you are horribly niave.

    9. Re:My 1st Thoughts by jotok · · Score: 3, Interesting

      It seemed like the customers are being ganked not because there was way too much "legitimate" traffic to handle, but because it was becoming a nuisance. The legitimacy of p2p applications is arguable so long as they have legal uses; the legitimacy of gaobot is not arguable as it has no legal uses on a public network.

    10. Re:My 1st Thoughts by strider44 · · Score: 2, Informative

      not so much in Australia. Though ISPs will forward emails sent from RIAA and MIAA etc there is no action taken, and the identity of the IP addresses aren't disclosed.

    11. Re:My 1st Thoughts by Squiddl3 · · Score: 3, Informative

      most likely he was reffering to the law in germany, that every logged connection data must be either anonymized (for technical logs) or must be needed for accounting procedures (but maximum is AFAIK 3 months).
      With a flatrate there is no such thing as "need for accounting", so the ISP isn't allowed to make logs, which are personalized.

      so the original poster most likely meant , if they can't have personalized logs, they ca n't shut you down.

    12. Re:My 1st Thoughts by vasqzr · · Score: 2, Informative

      Charter Communications in Michigan does that all the time.

    13. Re:My 1st Thoughts by cd_serek · · Score: 2, Interesting

      It sure is about time.

      Just last week, I lodged many many complaints to Telstra Bigpond regarding zombies sending excessive spams to my network. I even went to the trouble of submitting over 400+ zombie IP addresses (dynamic IPs with session times).

      Good to see that they are listening to their complaints hotline for once.

  2. Why is this news!?! by pctainto · · Score: 4, Informative

    ISPs around the world have been doing this for a while now! I live in a house with 12 people and one person had a hijacked computer sending out mail and Adelphia cut us off. Although they never told us that they did (a quick call to customer support hooked us back up).

    Seriously, why is this news?

    --
    I think my principles are reachin' an all time low
    1. Re:Why is this news!?! by MysteriousPreacher · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It's Australia's biggest ISP according to the posting.

      --
      -- Using the preview button since 2005
    2. Re:Why is this news!?! by Yrd · · Score: 4, Informative

      And? NTL are one of the biggest ISPs in the UK and they do the same thing.

      --
      Miri it is whil Linux ilast...
    3. Re:Why is this news!?! by TheScream · · Score: 2, Informative
      pctainto wrote:
      Seriously, why is this news?
      Because it is surprising that BigPond is doing anything proactive in the customer support area given its horrible customer service track record. Although, I guess their goal is to save money, not help its customers.
    4. Re:Why is this news!?! by GafferFish · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Save money? I figure they'll be loosing revenue based on excess data traffic charges generated by extra traffic caused by the trojans. Note to Non-Aussies: BigPond counts both uploads and downloads for data traffic with excess usage charged at A$0.15/mb. There have been cases of people being hit with very large internet bills for one month (IIRC the largest was in excess of $10,000)

    5. Re:Why is this news!?! by SQL+Error · · Score: 3, Funny

      The French overthrew their monarchy some years back.

      Yeah, in 1792, but in a typically French fashion, they had to do it again in 1814, then in 1815, once more in 1830, and yet again in 1848 and then several times during the 1870's.

      Then they tried to bring it back in 1946, but no-one could agree on who got to be King, so they ended up with President de Gaulle...

    6. Re:Why is this news!?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Here's what my ISP (Finnish PHNet) does when they detect a trojaned machine (all URLs you type into the browser give you this page):

      http://img56.echo.cx/my.php?image=phnetspamprotect 13vb.jpg

      You are also allowed access to another page with more details:

      http://img56.echo.cx/my.php?image=phnetspamprotect 05zy.jpg

    7. Re:Why is this news!?! by FireFury03 · · Score: 2, Informative

      NTL are one of the biggest ISPs in the UK and they do the same thing.

      Hah, you're kidding right? NTL have one of the worst records when it comes to responding to abuse reports. Trust me - I've had to deal with them several times about abuse matters and frankly they don't care.

    8. Re:Why is this news!?! by Andy_R · · Score: 2, Informative

      How can you tell? I doubt that compromised machines drop off the net more often than everyone else on NTL does. I have friends tied ito a 12 month contract with NTL who were told that a 7-day outage was 'normal', as was 30% packet loss.

      --
      A pizza of radius z and thickness a has a volume of pi z z a
    9. Re:Why is this news!?! by MyLongNickName · · Score: 5, Funny

      Then the French started outsourcing that "monarch overthrowing" job to the Germans.

      --
      See my journal for slashdot ID's by year. Mine created in 2005. http://slashdot.org/journal/289875/slashdot-ids-by-year
    10. Re:Why is this news!?! by kyojin+the+clown · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Alert! Alert! Finnish Website not in perfect English! Must be Phishing!

      One assumes that the links to the virus scanner and ad aware are allowed through.

  3. This is a good thing by kasperd · · Score: 5, Insightful

    More ISPs should handle compromised computers this way. Just leaving them around to harm the internet for the rest of is is irresponsible.

    --

    Do you care about the security of your wireless mouse?
    1. Re:This is a good thing by zimba-tm · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Well, there is no need to *disconnect* the computer if all you have to do is block the problematic port. It's so lazy to disconnect a computer. Do they know traffic shaping ?

    2. Re:This is a good thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      If you don't disconect the offending computer, how will the idiot who owns it know they've been an idiot? Disconecting it totally is a great way to handle the problem, because it forces the idiot to call customer services to find out why their connection no longer works, at which point you can lart them for being an idiot and force them to clean up their idiot-box before you reconnect them. Just silently droping the offending packets does nothing to educate the idiot involved.

    3. Re:This is a good thing by gabba_gabba_hey · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I'm just going to straight up paste the comment that an AC already posted in order that more people might see it as the AC stated the case almost perfectly (even if a tad abrasively) already:

      "If you don't disconect the offending computer, how will the idiot who owns it know they've been an idiot? Disconecting it totally is a great way to handle the problem, because it forces the idiot to call customer services to find out why their connection no longer works, at which point you can lart them for being an idiot and force them to clean up their idiot-box before you reconnect them. Just silently droping the offending packets does nothing to educate the idiot involved."

      So mods, please mod up the post I'm quoting if you feel inclined, otherwise ignore this post, thanks!

    4. Re:This is a good thing by R.Caley · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Well, there is no need to *disconnect* the computer if all you have to do is block the problematic port.

      I think for 99.9999% of a residential ISP's customers, having their access to DNS blocked would not be noticably different from disconnection.

      Besides, is someone has an infected PC, disconnection is a friendly action. It kicks them up the arse so they have to find out what is going on, and it prevents them being zombied.

      We have a collective problem that many many people have PCs on the internet but don't have the kind of basic understanding we demand before we'd allow them onto the road in a car. Sending them back to the garage for a day or two with a hint to learn what the windscreen wipers are for is good for everyone.

      --
      _O_
      .|<
      The named which can be named is not the true named
    5. Re:This is a good thing by KiloByte · · Score: 5, Interesting

      block problematic port

      It's not that simple. The attack in question was done by a flood of DNS queries -- you're not really going to cut off port 53, as this is pretty much equal to knocking that person off the Net.

      The typical case involves a lot of outgoing connections on port 25 -- you can't really block this as well unless the user in question uses nothing but webmail.

      Traffic shaping won't help a lot, either -- it can protect the server, of course, but won't help the user himself. In this case, it will just make their legitimate use prohibitely slow -- their web browser/whatever will compete with the virus they have over the tiny allotted quota of allowed DNS queries.

      IMO it's much better to just cut them off outright, telling them that the fault is on their side.

      If you want to be nice, you can redirect all their traffic to a web server which gives them a nice idiot-proof message about what they need to do. This is what I've set up for a friend's basement ISP (~30 paying users) -- although in that case, the message was similar to "your payment is due for two months, you didn't heed our reminders".

      --
      The creatures outside looked from Alt-Right to Antifa; but already it was impossible to say which was which.
    6. Re:This is a good thing by Dulcise · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I think isp's should do what ntl did during the ms blaster worm out break, which is only allow the user to connect to ether the removal tool or a page that contains a link to it and how to use it. it would take more work, but its better for the customer.

    7. Re:This is a good thing by mwvdlee · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Then again; all the windscreen wipers in the world couldn't stop a group of thugs from spraypainting your windscreen; you'd need lengthy and expensive training in self defense and chemical paint removal.

      You just assume that the people will suffice by installing (purchasing?) some equivalent to a windscreen wiper such as antivirus software but that won't be enough for the really nasty ones.

      Since the ISP can apparenty distinguish between good and bad traffic, can't they filter out any traffic which contains the troyans? They are assuming their non-IT clients can.

      --
      Slashdot social media options: AIM, ICQ, Yahoo, Jabber and Mobile Text. Why no MySpace?
    8. Re:This is a good thing by rabbit994 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Nothing stopping you from a setting up a local DNS server. We had issues with Comcast DNS until we simply set up our own.

    9. Re:This is a good thing by R.Caley · · Score: 3, Insightful
      You just assume that the people will suffice by installing (purchasing?) some equivalent to a windscreen wiper such as antivirus software but that won't be enough for the really nasty ones.

      If someone targets you for a sophisticated attack, you are probably not a normal internet user (eg you're commercial or a political site or something), you need professional IT support and shouldn't be using a normal retail ISP.

      Th threat to normal customers is generic worms and trojans and so on. Things which the basic security everyone should be usig will protect against. Just the equivalnt of using windscreen wipers when it is raining.

      IIRC my ISP supplies some kind of firewall/antivirus package for all customers. (I've had my connection since before this kind of thing became really necessary and don't connect from Windows, so I've never investigated what they are offerring). I can't imagine why any ISP would not do that -- the saving in customer support calls alone would more than pay for it.

      --
      _O_
      .|<
      The named which can be named is not the true named
    10. Re:This is a good thing by gabba_gabba_hey · · Score: 2, Insightful

      This is an absolutely acceptable solution in my opinion: Proxy the trojaned machines to only the page with the solution to their problem, or to a page stating that they have this problem and provide links to remedy the situation. I feel that that might just take care of this sort of thing.

      Cutting them off has a much higher pain-in-the-ass factor, however, which might lead to a more long term solution of user education. If the users actually have to jump through hoops to get back online, they might take greater steps to keep their machines patched and protected.

      Aesthetically I favor the latter situation as it really drives the point home. I'm not sure if the market would bare this out though. If a user can just jump ship to another ISP that doesn't cut them off they will probably do so in most cases.

      I think all ISP's should cut off trojaned users. Trojaned windows machines have really made the net hell for all of us. I'm certain everyone's spam count would drop considerably if those machines were just plain knocked off the net until patched.

      Anyway, long story short:

      I think the tactic the article is covering is great, however your suggestion, while not totally ideal in my little world, provides a happy pseudo medium ground that would also remedy a lot of my concerns. Cheers and pardon my drunken ramblings ;)

    11. Re:This is a good thing by FireFury03 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Disconecting it totally is a great way to handle the problem, because it forces the idiot to call customer services to find out why their connection no longer works

      Even better is to block all access and redirect web requests to a server that explains what's going on and provides patches, etc. That way people (with more than one brain cell) don't _have_ to phone customer support.

    12. Re:This is a good thing by FireFury03 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Eh? port 25 is for SMTP servers, a user has no need for this port unless they are running their own mail server. Checking your mail is done through POP3 and IMAP on ports 110 and 143, respectively.

      Err.. yes... how exactly do you send mail if you don't use SMTP? Oh that's right, you use the email-over-telepathy protocol...

    13. Re:This is a good thing by SatanicPuppy · · Score: 2, Interesting

      That would only work if it were easy to figure what was infecting the computer based solely on the traffic it's sending out. It's more complicated that you'd think.

      On the other hand, most people who don't know enough to keep their machines virus/trojan free are probably using the software that nearly every ISP sends out to "help" you connect to their services, which means they should be able to include enough diagnostic tools to be able to tell what's running on the machine.

      --
      ad logicam Claiming a proposition is false because it was presented as the conclusion of a fallacious argument.
    14. Re:This is a good thing by sadler121 · · Score: 3, Informative

      I think for 99.9999% of a residential ISP's customers, having their access to DNS blocked would not be noticably different from disconnection.

      Have you BEEN on the Comcast forums recently? Comcast is having a lOT of trouble with their DNS servers and it is effecting EVERYBODY.

      Last week when it happened I just switched my DNS addresses to MIT's, (though now I have a nice list of addy's just in case MIT's goes down). I have been instructing my friends on how to change the default DNS listings because they are being effected themselves. Once they change them, they have no problems. Hell, I didn't even know Comcast was having problems AGIAN yesterday because I just kept system with the MIT addy's.

      I have to think that if trojans are effectivly DDOSing Comcast's servers, if there is not some ultior motive behind this. DNS servers are the life blood of the Internet, to take them down means we would all have to know numbers to get around the Internet, and while I keep a few IP addy's in my bookmarks just in case, to except joe user to is rediculus.

      Of course it is probably just Comcast, who, as a regulated monopoly, has no incentive to upgrade services, because for many, Cable Internet is the only "broadband" (HA!) available. I would wouldn't be surprised if rates go up agian to cover the cost of whatever "upgrade" Comcast comes up with to solve this problem.

      Until then I am keeping my DNS addresses pointed to MIT's servers and I am NOT going to be using Comcasts.

  4. Is this really news? by xiaomonkey · · Score: 2, Insightful

    ISP has problems with boxes infected with malware. ISP identifies and blocks said boxes. Block is only temporary, and will be lifted when customers disinfect their boxes.....

    Where's the story?

  5. Hmm... makes sense to me! by PDA_Boy · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Despite nightly additions of DNS servers, BigPond appears to be unable to cope with the extra traffic on its network."

    Right- I can smell a cake burning. Let's add more flour! Come on- more flour!

    Oh- right- let's take the cake out the oven...

    Seems a sensible thing to do to me- tackle the computers causing the problems, rather than trying to react to the problem itself.

    Although, tackling the writers of the infecting programs would be good too, if somewhat harder.
    1. Re:Hmm... makes sense to me! by enigma48 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yeah - that whole AIDS thing has been a real waste of resources; why bother with non-cures?

      I'd give Telstra a big round of applause for at least appearing to try other options before cutting customers off. A significant minority (maybe majority?) of the customers who get cut are going to be *very* uncomfortable when they get called by Telstra. Telling people that their rough driving finally caused their car to break down isn't easy. Many CSRs will be threatened this week.

      I'm only been in AU for 2 months but from what I'm told, Telstra (until the past 7 years or so) has been a very benevolent monopoly. Being from Canada, most people at least disliked Bell and Rogers (our local telephone and cable monopolies, respectively). When Telstra's customer service tanked, opinion of the company apparently changed quickly. Or maybe was expressed more often, who knows.

      Either way, Telstra seems to have done the right thing. Kudos to the manager who made this decision... it must not have been easy.

    2. Re:Hmm... makes sense to me! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Umm... when the customer cannot connect to the
      internet, what do you think happens next?

      They call the ISP on the phone.

      And they are told to clean their computer.

      And the computer either gets cleaned,
      or they remain off the internet.

      Your cake analogy is flawed. Instead, think
      of an analogy involving quarantine, computers,
      viruses, ISPs and such. Wait. Instead of
      an analogy, why not just reason about what's
      going on in this situation.

      What confusion of facts lets you believe that
      quarantine is not addressing the infection
      directly? It UNAVOIDABLY causes the customer
      to fix the infection, or cease to piss in
      the public internet pool.

    3. Re:Hmm... makes sense to me! by figment · · Score: 2, Informative
      Another said: "I am having problems loading Web pages, I get the 404 [page not found] error. I have to retry five to 10 times to get some places."

      Which also is totally not a symptom of DNS timeouts either. You need a response from a webserver to get a 404.

      The article just seems poorly written, I wouldn't go out and assume that telstra just decided to throw 500 new dns servers at it.

    4. Re:Hmm... makes sense to me! by drsmithy · · Score: 2, Informative
      I'm only been in AU for 2 months but from what I'm told, Telstra (until the past 7 years or so) has been a very benevolent monopoly.

      Note that this coincides with its semi-privatisation (the government has a 50.1% stake in Telstra - which it can't wait to unload - the rest is publicly owned). Unsurprisingly, customer service has declined dramatically ever since "profit" became important. Telstra had previously been a "benevolent" monopoly because it had no reason to be anything else.

      The idea of a fully privatised telstra is rather scary. Not that I'm a huge fan of government running businesses, but in some cases (like utilities and similarly fundamental/infrastructure type services) I think there's a strong case for it.

      (The drive to fully privatise Telstra was one of the two main reasons I didn't vote Liberal (for the first time ever) at the last elections - the US-AU FTA being the other one.)

  6. Drastic Measures by onosendai · · Score: 5, Interesting

    These are drastic measures, but given the average BigPond user is much less a geek than anyone frequenting these parts, this will probably be the first time that most of these users will know about it, and given BigPond's previous problems with mail-servers, perhaps they're striking before the problem gets too out of hand.

    Although I don't understand the purpose of a trojaned machine repeatedly hitting a DNS server, is this an attempt to cause an overflow and therefore making the DNS server itself vulnerable?

    --
    <? include ('signature.inc'); ?>
    1. Re:Drastic Measures by Arghdee · · Score: 5, Informative

      To expand on this, a lot of you non-australians should probably know that Telstra Bigpond is the ISP that people choose when they don't know any better.

      Value for money wise they rate very poorly compared to the opposition - for ADSL at least.

      For those of you that don't know, Telstra is a part government owned company, which owns much of the telco infrastructure in Australia. They like to make life difficult for any competitors.

      Also one of the few ISPs in Australia that charges traffic in both directions.

      Just in case you guys care :)

    2. Re:Drastic Measures by droleary · · Score: 2, Informative

      Although I don't understand the purpose of a trojaned machine repeatedly hitting a DNS server, is this an attempt to cause an overflow and therefore making the DNS server itself vulnerable?

      Well, let's say you've got yourself a spam zombie sending out a million messages. How many unique domains would that average out to be? 500,000? 100,000? Let's generously give it another order of magnitude and say 10,000 (i.e., average of 100 inboxes spammed per domain). Compare that to Joe Average user; how many domains do regular folks hit in a day? 10? Upwards of 100? A far cry from the DNS traffic they're probably seeing from malware controlled customers.

    3. Re:Drastic Measures by novakreo · · Score: 2, Informative

      To expand on this, a lot of you non-australians should probably know that Telstra Bigpond is the ISP that people choose when they don't know any better.

      Not necessarily. Please don't generalise.
      Where I live I have the choice of Optus or Bigpond (Telstra) cable internet. Optus prohibits servers in their acceptable use policy, and according to the Whirlpool forums they block certain ports to enforce this.

      ADSL is also available, but it has a much lower download speed. We also have the Optus Local phone service running over their cable network, so to get ADSL we'd need to switch back to the (Telstra) copper phone line first.

      When I signed up for broadband, Bigpond cable offered free installation and 2 months free access on a 24-month plan. Compared to getting the copper phone line reconnected and changing telcos, having ADSL activated, and whatever upfront fees were involved in getting an ADSL modem, and still only being able to download at a fraction of the speed, cable seemed the much better choice.

      I'm not a big fan of Telstra, but right now there's nothing better out there. Hopefully by the time my contract expires my exchange will have ADSL2, and I can consider other options.

      --
      O frabjous day! Callooh! Callay!
    4. Re:Drastic Measures by XSforMe · · Score: 2, Informative

      Although I don't understand the purpose of a trojaned machine repeatedly hitting a DNS server, is this an attempt to cause an overflow and therefore making the DNS server itself vulnerable?
      In adition to the already commented use of sending spam, zombied machiens can be used to poison DNS servers. The poisoning basically involves sending lots of forged packets to the DNS server in what is known as a birthday attack. There has recently been a rash of these kind of attacks as documented by SANS.

      --
      My other OS is the MCP!
  7. Mathematically... by Shag · · Score: 5, Funny

    if BIGNUM% of PC's are malware-infested (I've heard 80% tossed around) and they get disconnected, suddenly anyone who's looking at their web logs will think that an unusually high number of Big Pond users are on Linux boxen, Macs, etc.

    If more ISPs did this, maybe we'd see a decline in sites that only work in MSIE...

    --
    Village idiot in some extremely smart villages.
  8. Good idea to me by Rainwulf · · Score: 5, Interesting

    i think this is a good idea as well. I work in technical support, and the amount of infected machines i have to deal with is just phenomenal. Cutting of the machines access to internet both fixes the problem. The customer goes "WTF" and i say.. yea your machine is infected. Either install nix or go to a computer store. However its open to abuse... define excessive traffic.. and what traffic is malware or legitimate traffic. However... since a good 90 percent of spam comes from infected machines as well (go windows you good thing go) its all thumbs up from me.

    1. Re:Good idea to me by asliarun · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I agree with you. This IS a big problem for ISPs. However, i feel that the solution is not to pass the buck onto the customers. You can't realistically expect Joe SixPack, who doesn't know the difference between the CD tray and a coffee cup holder, to keep his computer up to date with the latest service pack or patch.

      A better alternative for the ISPs, IMHO, would be to start behaving like the network administration team in a big company. Joe Sixpack would be better off if the ISP would install a centrally adminsitered system administration client on his machine that automatically scans and deploys the latest anti-virus program. I know that computer-savvy folks wouldn't like to give this much of control of their PCs to ISPs. However, for Joe, this would be the ideal hassle-free solution. With a proper security policy, privacy concerns would also not be an issue.

      The ISP could also have an opt-out policy that non-clueless people could make use of.

      Does this make sense?

    2. Re:Good idea to me by Kamel+Jockey · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You can't realistically expect Joe SixPack, who doesn't know the difference between the CD tray and a coffee cup holder, to keep his computer up to date with the latest service pack or patch.

      Why not? Most people don't know anything about how their cars work but do know that the oil needs to be changed at regular intervals and when the "Service Engine Soon" light comes on, it's time to visit a mechanic. They also know that if they don't do this their car will cease to function.

      I'm really sick of the whole "people who don't know computers should be exempt from the rules" attitude. You know? Personal computers have been around for a very long time now, they aren't novelty items and people who use them should be expected to be courteous enough to keep them virus-free.

      I for one am glad a major ISP is finally cutting off people who are too lazy to keep their computers secure. I hope more ISPs do this.

      --
      In case of fire, do not use elevator. Use water!
    3. Re:Good idea to me by asliarun · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "Well, Joe SixPack isn't trained to fix his car either, does that mean the state should act like a big car repair shop as well?"

      Not the state, but car manufacturers and dealers definitely do.

      As people start treating their computers more and more as an "internet machine", the focus shifts from the hardware or software manufacturer to the ISP. To put it another way, if ISP X offers network and system management, and ISP Y only offers internet connectivity, i would definitely recommend ISP X to my friends and relatives. Even if X charges an extra 10 bucks a month for the service.

      "My point: if joe six pack is not able to get his computer in good working order, he can pay someone to do it, just like he does to get his car fixed..."

      Agreed. However, if the ISP is offering the same maintenance contract, i would definitely recommend it over the Dell contract.

      My point is not that the ISP is *obligated* to provide this service. My point is that an ISP is the only entity that's permanently connected to the customer. Hence, it's in a unique position to offer services (such as security and even software support) that no-one else can. This is a unique opportunity for an ISP and they *should* make use of it.

  9. Waste of time? by www.sorehands.com · · Score: 5, Interesting
    They should at least make a phone call to the party so they don't waste time trying to figure out the problem.

    Not all people pick up the phone and tolerate the script. Some people actually try to diagnose the problem first.


    Most ISPs have language in their terms of service that permits this action. It is a shame that an ISP need to have their services almost knocked out before taking action.

    I'd like to see some ISPs that ignore trojaned machines or support spammers get sued by other customers when their IP blocks end up on block lists.

    1. Re:Waste of time? by Raumkraut · · Score: 3, Informative

      I was 'disconnected' from my ADSL a while back, not because any of my machines were infected, but because I'd tried scanning my company's IP.
      My ISP had detected traffic on port 135 (some Windows thing exploited by malware), and automatically stopped forwarding any connections to or from my home machines. The only port which was allowed was port 80, and every web page request was redirected to a help page explaining what had happened. :)

      After blocking port 135 at my router, all it took was clicking a link on the aforementioned web page, and my connection was restored automagically.

      Rather well implemented, I thought.

  10. Plusnet has a better way. by Zeussy · · Score: 5, Informative

    My isp (plus.net) monitors any communications on port 135 etc and if it dedicates any when your connected. You get redirected to a Plus.net you may have been effected with MSBlast page etc. And give you the links to tools to fix it.

    Very handy indeed.

  11. All ISPs should be doing this. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    All of these infected Windows boxes are killing the net. If ISPs would simply yank them as they show signs of infection (trojan, worms, etc) UNTIL the customers can demonstrate that they have taken care of problems, then things would be a lot easier.

  12. Catch-22 by Mr_Silver · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Of course, once you have no net connection, it becomes a little difficult to download all the latest Microsoft patches and virus updates to clean your machine so you can get back on the internet.

    Thats not to say it isn't impossible, but it wouldn't surprise me that taking a laptop/ipod/some other storage device big enough around to another friends house and getting all the updates is going to be beyond most people.

    Also, last time I checked, I can't download all the updates that have been developed after XP SP2 was released from a machine running Windows 2000.

    (side note: I'm on a 56k modem at home and therefore don't have a spare 3 weeks to get the several hundred megabytes of updates - and autopatcher xp hasn't been updated after sp2 was released)

    --
    Avantslash - View Slashdot cleanly on your mobile phone.
    1. Re:Catch-22 by Guus.der.Kinderen · · Score: 2, Insightful

      This is just a random thought, but what about this: after disconnecting, the ISP sends the customer a letter explaining why they dropped the connection, and include a coupon for a CD with some of the latest microsoft patches and servicepacks. They might even work out some deal with an antivirus vendor and add some shareware antivirus kits to cover the costs and send those CDs for free.

    2. Re:Catch-22 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      applying ANY patches is beyond most people.

      hell updating their virusscanner is beyond them.

  13. Nothing new by Rob+Kaper · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Dutch ISP Xs4All has been doing this for months/years, blocking all traffic (most notably SMTP) minus SSH and access to their HTTP proxy.

    1. Re:Nothing new by pe1chl · · Score: 2, Informative

      They only put up this block after it has been shown that your system is virus or trojan infected and you have not responded to requests to do something about that.
      Normally there is no filtering whatsoever.

  14. How will the user tell the difference? by aussie_a · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Lucky they're ringing up the user, because otherwise the user will just assume that they've been disconnected. Yet again. Bigpond is terrible with keeping it's users online (I'm talking broadband here), and believe that two to three disonnects per day is perfectly fine, even when those disconnects last for an hour or more.

    I can see it now:
    Customer: My broadband is down again.
    Bigpond: Oh, I see. Well from time to time this does happen for a brief moment...
    Customer: It's been down all day, and it's happened every day this week.
    Bigpond: I see.. What's your account *clickety* Oh yes, we've marked you as a computer with a trojan. Please do a virus scan and call us back, if it comes back negative we'll re-connect you.

    I'd go with someone else but they're the only broadband provider for my area. And I live in Sydney (the suburbs, an hour from the city itself)

  15. Just traffic? Or trojan traffic? by SlashDread · · Score: 4, Informative

    Look, I ALL for ISP's disconnecting "polluting" PC's. They just better make damn sure its not legit traffic.

    My ISP does exactly this, if it suspects trojan traffic it shuts you down (and snail mail you). You subsequently call the helpdesk, they ask what you did to resolve the matters (The ISP provides FREE anti-virus and firewall software). If they rae happy with your counter measures, theyll reconnect you in a jiffy.
    If you can explain you have a legit reason to hit DNS 9765 times per second, I suspect they'll unlock you too.

    I love it.

  16. Slow response times? by Stephen+Samuel · · Score: 4, Insightful
    One problem with this is that many ISPs are days (or even weeks) behind on responding to complaints. I have a script which automates the process of generating SPAM and virus complaints. In the cases where I've actually gotten a real-live response, it's almost invariably been days after my complaint. (It's only the smallest ISPs that seem to have a fast response time.) In the menatime, these machines have been spewing spam and viruses across the 'net.

    If Telestra is like any other large ISP I've seen, I figure that the first thing they should do is hire (or allocate) a good gaggle of AUP investigators so that their intelligence on this problem is reasonably real-time.

    They could also write some scripts to log and categorize the DNS queries that they're getting from their customers. It should be fairly easy to automatically identify the worst offenders. You could then send notes to their owners, and if there's no reasonable response, pull the plug. Over the last few years, I think that I've written scripts to do pretty much everything but the last step, so I know it's doable. (that last step should almost always be manual).

    --
    Free Software: Like love, it grows best when given away.
  17. Other ISPs block ports in order to reduce threats by goonerw · · Score: 3, Informative

    Aussie ISP Internode (one of the better alternatives to BigPond) deliberately block various types of malware (usually port blocking but other means have been employed such as IP blocking a client's IP) and an advisory is placed on the service status page indicating what is blocked and for how long.

    --
    LOAD ".SIG"
    PRESS PLAY ON TAPE
  18. suspected PCs? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Why do they talk about 'likely source' and about cuting off 'suspected PCs'?

    Why not simply do a precise measurement (get the netflow from the router) and take actions based on correct data rather then guessing?

    I for one wouldn't want to be cut off by my ISP because of someone at the ISP is guessing.

  19. My permanent boycott of Telstra by petrus4 · · Score: 4, Informative

    Attempting to strangle ADSL adoption, killing the national BBS community when the Internet first became mainstream in Australia in order to force adoption of Big Pond, and a host of other offenses meant that after an extended period of shopping around, I finally stopped using Telstra as a carrier completely last year, and they can now consider themselves permanently boycotted as far as I'm concerned. They are one of the most short-sighted, destructive, and generally amoral corporations I've heard of. They were also vocally criticised by Bill Gates during one of his visits here, for their strangulation of broadband adoption.

    Apart from the above, to some degree there are now price incentives to use other carriers as well, particularly for voice. If you've got a credit card, you also might want to check out TPG for ADSL...they probably have the best deals I've seen.

  20. NTL by bcmm · · Score: 4, Insightful

    NTL (UK cable provider) does this. They once started redirecting all HTTP requests from our home network to a page saying "You have netsky. Download this." or something. I had to try this with the Linux box before I believed this wasn't an attempt to distribute malware. Thing is, I checked all the Windows machines with NTL's tool and with Sophos AV, and they were all clean.

    Other people with this problem have speculated that Linux machines (which NTL allows but "doesn't support") are sometimes mis-detected as Netsky-infected Windows PCs.

    The moral is, if this sort of thing is going to become widespread, they need good detection of many different types of network usage, and they need to tell them by phone instead of just giving them what looks like a default-homepage highjack.

    In a similar vein, remember MS marking VNC as spyware? Imagine if an ISP starts taking down VNC servers for the users own security, etc, etc.

    --
    # cat /dev/mem | strings | grep -i llama
    Damn, my RAM is full of llamas.
  21. Re:Potential boon for alternative OSes by grolschie · · Score: 4, Informative

    Except on most Linux dists:
    1). the default user is not an administrator
    2). 99.9% of malware cannot run. If it did, then it'd cause minimal damage (see 1.)
    3). There is no ActiveX
    4). etc, etc, etc

    The average Linux (non root) user can be as clueless as he/she likes and won't get into trouble.

  22. sick are put in quarantaine net (on this uni) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    When computers here (utwente.nl) are infected it is usually automatically detected, resulting in every webrequest going to "you're in quarantaine, you can download clean-up tools HERE, and when you're clean send us a message HERE. apart from that you can connect to nothing." If you're interested, it's run by the guys from http://snt.student.utwente.nl

  23. Pretty Standard by jchawk · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I'm surprised it's taken them this long. When one of our customers gets infected with a virus / open proxy / etc... We *gasp* pay attention, shutdown their connection and immediately contact them and help them fix the problem.

    It's amazing how quickly you can get your network under control doing this. And 9 times out of 10 the end user is greatful that you were willing to work with them to help them correct the problem.

    Fixing infected machines on your network only makes the network a better place for everyone using it.

  24. Breaking news??? by Eyeball97 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    We've been doing this since the late 90's, what's "news" here? Customers get contacted in several ways, including personally by telephone. If they don't clean their open proxy/smtp relay/virus/worm after that, they get cut off. There'd be a lot less worms and spam around if all ISPs acted this responsibly, what a shame it's taken these guys until now to catch on.

  25. Not So Fast, Sonny Jim by SQL+Error · · Score: 4, Funny

    I work for a phone company here in Oz, and among other things we resell Telstra ADSL.

    I've seen Telstra claim that a customer on a 512/128 line (512kb/s down, 128kb/s up) uploaded 4GB in 20 hours. When I pointed out that this was impossible, they suggested that maybe the user's computer had been infected by a virus - and insisted that I check this before they would investigate.

    I then spent some time explaining the concept of arithmetic to the Telstra support desk...

  26. Best Practice by MrNonchalant · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Send the effected customers (better yet, all customers) a CD with a free anti-virus, free anti-spyware, a free firewall, an alternative browser, and the latest updates for all of the above plus Windows and Office (including support for ME, NT, 2000, 98 SE, 98, and 95). With it include a letter explaining courtiously and simply why security is important. Sure, you'd probably have to get permission from a dozen different legal departments to do distribution of nominally free software on a wide scale like that, but some companies I know would jump at having their demo version shipped.

    Back this up with your regular tech support. Yes, some users will be too clueless but a good deal won't. A fair percentage of the clueless ones will catch on quickly when their internet gets shut off and stays off. I can guarentee you the network traffic they'd get would drop to a third of the levels seen before.

    Actually, in this perspective AOL's lackluster virus and spyware protection make perfect sense.

  27. Not really by Craig+Ringer · · Score: 4, Informative

    With most such set-ups your Internet connection is generally not totally blocked, just severely restricted. Any web request gets proxy-redirected to a page with instructions on how to clean your machine up, and download links from the ISPs local mirrors. Anything else is locked down.

    I don't know if this is what bigpond are doing, but that's the usual way to handle this and it seems to work extremely well. My ISP uses a similar trick when users go over quota.

  28. How acquire spyware removal tools if disconnected? by matt+me · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I don't think the ISPs quite thought this plan though. Users aren't going to be able clean up their computers without tools such as ad-aware and spybot search & destroy. These ppl probably don't even have a virus checker at all. The necessary software is freely avaliable online, but without a net connection these ppl will have to buy $100 of stuff at PC World. And that'll need updating online anyway.

    A better idea would be to restrict bandwidth and connections on infected computers. The ISP should also post everyone they disconnect a CD with the usual free tools and instructions on how to use them. Along with Firefox and Thunderbird, of course.

    I agree though, action should be taken against owners of zombie computers. They're irresponsibly spoiling the internet for others. Such users who think 'Internet Explorer' is the internet and believe the internet = the web.

    While such ignorant users should be allowed to run computers in private, once they're connected to the internet, they become a danger to everyone else. The way I see it, I'm not allowed to drive a car on the road without first taking a test to make sure I can use it safely, and recognise and repair common problems (or at least take the car to the garage). This requires knowledge of both how the mechanics of the engine work, and of the highway code. So why are people who have never even seen the inside of computer and don't realise that connecting an unpatched WinXP box to broadband is as dangerous as speeding down a motorway in the opposite direction to all traffic, allowed to do exactly that?

  29. That's nothing by themusicgod1 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Here at the University of Regina my roommate MachinationX had gotten a virus on his WinXP box (why didn't he have antivirus software?! he's an IT consultant!! but I digress) So our ISP (U of R computing services) not only disconnected him from the network, but refused to let him back on the network unless he agreed to give them his computer and let *them* run an antivirus scan on it , after which it would be returned. I happened to have some of my old backups on his machine at the time, but the point is that our ISP can not only watch your internet traffic(as they have been), but if you "get a virus" they can disconnect you and demand they have access to all your personal files at will.

    Blows my mind.

    --
    GENERATION 26: The first time you see this, copy it into your sig on any forum and add 1 to the generation.
  30. My ISP does this regularly by tmk · · Score: 3, Informative

    My ISP Netcologne disconnects PCs that are infected with trojans and try to infect others. The connection is interrupted and when the costumer tries to connect again he can only access one page, that shows an information. He can download Antivir there, too.

    There are two restrictions: Netcologne certainly does not monitor all traffic - they react on abuse-messages. And this "service" is not available to business costumers.

  31. Routine? by Kumochisonan · · Score: 3, Insightful

    My Employer, a large national Cable ISP in Britain routinely suspends service to customers due to nasties on the unsuspecting users PC. Our infrastructure runs daily scripts that scan for open mail proxies and other suspicious ports that may be open. It's just part of the normal security process.

    However it never used to be, this aggressive step of securing our network was prompted by the ISP being threatened with a Usenet Death Penalty, twice.

    Whether this BigPond story is any different (Because it deals with Trojans rather than mail relays) is another matter...

    --
    kill elrond
    take elrond
    put elrond in cupboard
  32. Cox Business ISP Does This by SoupIsGood+Food · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The Business Class cablemodem accounts with Cox Communications are cut off if their security systems catch suspicious activity (DDOS packets, worm traffic, etc.) or open relays on your network connection. They're very polite about it, explain the problem and how to get it fixed. Their security department's not open after hours, either, so you're horked if you figure this out after midnight.

    Haven't had to deal with their nice security people myself (No Windows or Linux or Sendmail here!), but I've laughed at colleagues who have. Mostly the same people who believe a $70/month cablemodem or DSL connection can replace their $800/month fiber line for serious webhosting enterprises.

    SoupIsGood Food

    1. Re:Cox Business ISP Does This by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I got taken off my Cox connex last year for five days due to a bogus Torrent claim (it was FOSS not Copyright Infringement). Upon investigating the reason I was offline (checked the bills, etc) I decided to call Cox. Sure enough, they d/c'd me. I asked them about this policy, and the rep compared it to a "3 Strikes" policy. Now, I was bummed about being taken offline, and even convionced the rep that I wasn't a pirate and this was a mistake, but after I got back online I stared thinking about this "3 Strikes" thing. I actually agreed with it.

  33. This is certainly within precedent by smchris · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Amateur radio operators, for example, have a responsibility to make sure their equipment is working properly, properly tuned, and operated without malicious intent so that it doesn't interfere with others.

  34. (Uni computing services) != (commercial ISP) by sczimme · · Score: 4, Insightful

    So our ISP (U of R computing services) not only disconnected him from the network,

    So you get your Internet feed through Uni computing services - noted.

    but refused to let him back on the network unless he agreed to give them his computer and let *them* run an antivirus scan on it , after which it would be returned.

    That's actually not a bad idea. They want to be sure that the system in question is no longer a problem. I'm sure you can see where a user would have motivation to lie about the scan if it would get him back on the network.

    but the point is that our ISP can not only watch your internet traffic(as they have been), but if you "get a virus" they can disconnect you and demand they have access to all your personal files at will.

    Blows my mind.


    Re: watching traffic, disconnecting users - re-read the Terms of Service you signed when you accepted their Internet access; I suspect you will find they've had these capabilities all along.

    However, your comment about demand... access to all your personal files at will is completely ridiculous.

    First, computing services will only need to examine your PC if it causing a problem for other users; if things have gotten to this point you are either unable or unwilling to maintain the machine yourself and have effectively abdicated this responsibility.

    Second, you probably already gave them permission to require such a scan when you agreed to the ToS (see above).

    Third, who says your personal files have to remain on the machine if/when you turn it in for virus scanning?? Your roommate was told to deliver the computer; he can sanitize it before he does so. (This should be obvious.)
    The University is not a commercial ISP. They provide the Internet access as a tool for you to use to further your education. It is a shared resource, and if you are causing problems they can rectify said problems as necessary based on the ToS. If you don't like their ToS you are free to go back to dial-up or pay for a T1.

    --
    I want to drag this out as long as possible. Bring me my protractor.
  35. Re:Last email they got by Eyeball97 · · Score: 3, Insightful
    1. LOL. Okay it is funny, but...

    2. If they had any smarts at all, they'd still allow the client access to a whitelist of sites - windowsupdate, symantec, etc, as well as allowing them access to their own web/ftp sites to download fixes. If they don't, they're only doing a half-ass job of helping to fix the problem.

  36. 404 File Not Found? by bigtallmofo · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I agree with your post completely, but from TFA:

    Another said: "I am having problems loading Web pages, I get the 404 [page not found] error. I have to retry five to 10 times to get some places."

    I may be daft but I don't understand how a DNS or network capacity problem could cause a web server to respond with an explicit "404 File Not Found" HTML error. I could see a timeout, DNS error, or any number of other errors, but a 404 would mean literally that you contacted the web server, it was unable to find the specific file you requested, and it successfully reported that back to you.

    Hopefully the forum poster that is quoted in the article just thinks every HTML error is a 404.

    --
    I'm a big tall mofo.
  37. Mod parent up by BVis · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It's rare that an AC leaves a comment that can even see insightful, let alone actually contribute something. At least here in the US the phrase "We reserve the right to refuse service to anyone" would apply. Their network, their rules. If you go into a nightclub and start spewing feces on the other patrons, they don't refund your cover charge when they throw you out.

    Deal with it, and clean up your fucking computer.

    --
    Never underestimate the power of stupid people in large groups.
  38. Re:Potential boon for alternative OSes by Flying+Purple+Wombat · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Except on most Linux dists:
    1). the default user is not an administrator


    Wait until Linux goes mainstream. Most people will just log in as root for normal activities to avoid the hassle of "su". After all, they don't have to bother with such annoyances under Windows. If they don't log in as root, they will happily supply the root password and/or click "OK" for any popup - just like on Windows.

    The problem is that the average Joe has no idea how computers work, and they don't want to think about it. They will follow the path of least resistance to pr0n or pirated music without thinking about the consequences.

    --
    If God had meant for man to see the sunrise, He would have scheduled it later in the day.
  39. This happens in America too by Eezy+Bordone · · Score: 2, Informative
    My mother-in-law had her PC removed from the network by her ISP 2 years ago and she was on dial up. They did email and phone her to tell her that until she removed the offending software that she wouldn't be able to connect.

    Granted, this is a regional ISP in BFE North Dakota but it still counts and ISPs have the right to do this. My M-I-L gets DSL in two weeks, should make for interesting times.

    --

    -EB

    Do you ever walk alone like a drifter in the dark?

  40. Ah... this is unusual? by jidar · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I've worked for 3 ISP's in the midwest, and all of them have had no tolerance policies that allowed them to cut the customer off at the first sign of spam, trojan or virus activity. I personally have cut off dozens of accounts this way, and why not? People are responsible for their own machines, asking them to keep them cleaned up isn't unreasonable in my opinion. In fact, asking us to keep supplying service to them while their rogue systems flood the net with crap is a lot more unreasonable than that imo. This isn't like their bill is a day late or something, this is an active malicious atttack on the network, of course we aren't going to let it go on regardless of whether the customer is home to pick up the phone when we detect it. That's how it should be.

    --
    Sigs are awesome huh?
  41. Re:How acquire spyware removal tools if disconnect by aug24 · · Score: 2, Insightful
    connecting an unpatched WinXP box to broadband is as dangerous as speeding down a motorway in the opposite direction to all traffic

    Really??

    J.

    --
    You're only jealous cos the little penguins are talking to me.
  42. If port 53 is blocked... by tepples · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Nothing stopping you from a setting up a local DNS server.

    Unless this DNS server can connect to other DNS servers on port 53, having a DNS server isn't going to do you much good with respect to accessing the public Internet.

  43. Shut up by Hrothgar+The+Great · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I really hate you "WHY IS THIS NEWS?!!!!" crybabies. It's news because this particular ISP is doing something which it previously was not. See how that works? Something HAPPENS, and then someone REPORTS that it happened, and then the story gets posted here because its subject matter appeals to a large portion of this site's readership. Are you so blindingly stupid as to actually need this explained to you? It's the fucking dictionary definition of news.

    By the way, most ISPs still are NOT doing this. Time Warner's Road Runner, for instance, never even looks in the direction of a trojaned machine on their network - at least in my area.

  44. Not Liability by protolith · · Score: 2, Insightful

    This is not a liability issue,

    This is like the ISP Road Department analogy from a story yesterday, The ISP is not so much checking the contents of passing cars on a highway for contraband.
    This is more like the Highway department kicking cars off the road because their owners have allowed them to degrade to horse drawn carts and all the horseshit on the road is causing problems with slow traffic and time and money to clean up the mess, I say this is a good move.

  45. Roger's Cable Internet (Canada) Is Doing it Too by quakeroatz · · Score: 2, Informative

    I've had some phone calls lately from clients that were disconnected from Roger's Highspeed Cable becuase they were trojaned or mass mailing. After inspecting 3 systems, they were all infected with NetskyP and Bugbear.

    Both were very easy to remove, I even used Microsoft's Malicious Software Removal Tool (gasp) that was quick and easy. I wish they would kick all of these infected PC's offline and we wouldn't be dealing with these erratic spikes that have now made turned FPS gaming into a modem like affair.

    I bet a few of the "free" antivirus companies, like AVP could make a killing sending out "AOL Like" demo cd's that cure the ails of all these banished network newbies.

  46. Sending mail without Port 25 by billstewart · · Score: 2, Informative
    First of all, most ISPs that "Block Port 25" don't block it for connections to their own mail server - only for connections that don't use their servers, either because they're going directly to the recipient or because they're going to some other mail server. If you're using the ISP's outgoing mail server, then they've got a handle for rate-limiting your mail (so they can detect or at least inhibit spammers, and possibly even spam-filter email), and they can provide whatever quality of email administration they want. For dialup users, this is often useful, because mailers benefit from being directly connected to the net in case the recipient can't handle their mail immediately (an especially frequent problem due to grey-listing.) But for broadband Linux users, it's often annoying, because the cable companies especially are often not very good at it. Some ISPs, mostly cable, used to be really obnoxious and not only block non-port-25 email but also require your From: address to be an address on their mail server. Fortunately, most of them have been beaten into submission by the market.

    But there are several other protocols for sending email that don't look like Port 25 to the ISP. There are a couple of SMTP-submission protocols which let you set up a connection to a mail server where you have an account and do various kinds of authentication, including some that use SSL encryption. Alternatively, you can do SSH or IPSEC or other VPN tunnels to your email provider. And then for us old folks, there's always "login to a shell account" :-) (Kids can use webmail instead.)

    As far as email-over-telepathy goes, Dan Kaminsky recently demonstrated IP-over-DNS tunnelling at Codecon. It's really really evil - he was even able to do video-over-IP-over DNS by coopting about 25000 DNS servers. I'm pretty sure he was the guy who did a lot of the IP-over-HTTP tunnelling a couple of years back, and he;s done lots of other creative work with detailed protocol analysis.

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
  47. Will it help linux? by Omni+Magnus · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I wonder after enough people get disconnected if they will switch to Linux.