Munich Decides On Debian
RichiH writes "Notwithstanding the recent craze about Ubuntu and the negative effects this might have, the german city of Munich chose Debian as the base for its LiMux project. Gonicus and SoftCon are the companies who were chosen to achieve this feat. With 14,000 desktops, this is one of the largest Linux transistions ever, even prompting Microsoft's Steve Balmer to offer a rebate of 90%. Other /. coverage here here and here."
This has been in the planning stage for a long time. Much as I love the almighty Penguin, I'll believe this when I see it.
tasks(723) drafts(105) languages(484) examples(29106)
What the heck happened there?
At least it's not Windows!
-m
http://www.invisik.com
prompting Microsoft's Steve Balmer to offer a rebate of 90%.
Ah, the price of Windows XP is now down to $20? With Linux and Solaris free of charge, Microsoft still has some distance to go.
-- Microsoft is the most expensive commodity operating system and office suite vendor in the marketplace.
Good call Munich !
-- "He who receives an idea from me, receives instruction himself without lessening mine; as he who lights his taper a
I'm looking forward to see how they are going to plan a uniform distribution of packages across such a large quantity of workstations... rpm/apt/yum/redcarpet2/zenworks/altiris ?
with his rebates. I think M$ is so vicious in their borg like behavior that giving an entire group of 14,000 users a 90% rebate is just a sign of what theyll do to keep their userbase in Europe. Something I fear that they have clearly lost already. Why doesnt Ballmer just give them Windows for free and see if that will denth their $800,000,000+ settlement by the EU?
Questions to be answered.
"God of Rock, thank you for this chance to kick ass. "
Very interesting site linked to in the 4th to last link of that article. I hadn't heard of this "/." before.
Oh, wait...
# cat
Damn, my RAM is full of llamas.
Can we have a proper translation please? mein Deutsch ist nich so gut
Donald 'Duck' Dunn: We had a band powerful enough to turn goat piss into gasoline.
Debian still has a larger package base, more archs supported and a bit less complecated costomazations. Ubuntu is better for end users looking for an easy install. The only "distrobution" we have seen derive from Ubuntu is Kubuntu, and thats just an alternative set of packages for default installation, and I would not be surprised if this mostly remains the same. Debian as a distro base is tried and true.
I feel this is like comparing ROCK with Gentoo, if less extreem
my sig
No? Oh, well, I still think this calls for a Heineken.
It's all fun and games until someone loses the key to the handcuffs.
- The company makes more than 90% profit on every copy of Windows they sell.
- Microsoft was attempting to "dump" the software for less than their cost, and should be prosecuted for that crime.
If it's the first one, then people and companies need to start paying attention. If it's the second one, then the government(s) need to start paying attention.Software sucks. Open Source sucks less.
Hmmmmm....Typical of an Anon Coward. If your going to flame , at least do it with an account so we can all Foe you out.
Again I refer to my previous post , if M$ is willing to dump free software onto a group to salvage a lost market share, no matter how small (14k in relative to the world is pretty small) , is a clear sign that M$ is concerned about loss.
Not saying that M$ doesnt have its place, it does. Its done wonders for the client to start off.
But its time to innovate, and they havent done that. All theyve done is release unstable and insecure product into the market and allow it to do what it does. Would we have large qualifiers of legistlation and law items going against spyware, malware, and viruses, if not for Microsoft?
Can someone answer that?
If your going to make a Troll comment at least do it with some flair.
"God of Rock, thank you for this chance to kick ass. "
The marginal cost of any copy of windows is the cost of distributing the software.
you see, with a standard product, like a car, a large hunk of the cost comes from paying for the raw materials, paying to make them into the parts and paying for the assembly and testing.
Since microsoft has already written windows the cost per additional sale is mostly in actual cd production. We are looking a cents/copy. But if they were to sell these in a microeconomic free market (one without monopolies) they would only be able to charge slightly more than marginal costs. If microsoft only got cents/copy they would lose money and all incentive to produce a product.
This has the side effect that they can increase revenue by decreasing the prices of a FEW copies that they otherwise would not have sold almost without limit.
This is just the tip of the iceberg for Debian.
Especially in germany are a lot of organizations which were dissatisfied with SUSE services and switched to Debian.
According to Noèl Köthe's employer credativ, a company with strong Debian background, has made a SUSE to Debian migration for 30-40 organizations in 2004.