Slashdot Mirror

← Back to Stories (view on slashdot.org)

XBox 360 Designed for Portability?

Posted by Zonk on from the would-almost-have-to-be-smaller-wouldn't-it? dept.

Spotless Tiger writes "XBox enthusiasts (or at least, those smart enough to read Slashdot) know now that IBM's PowerPC is at the heart of the next generation XBox 360. IBM has released a paper (PDF) on Solid Logic Technology, SLT, a processor technology that will debut on the 360. Essentially, this is another attempt to produce chips that are high performance with low power consumption. There's speculation that, with Microsoft's technology choices and rumours of a removable hard drive, the XBox 360 is designed to be much, much, smaller and more portable than its predecessor." Update: 04/15 04:27 GMT by Z : Removed the link to the paper from the stone age. Sorry about that. As much as I like reading research papers...

41 of 66 comments (clear)

  1. Smaller and more portable? by DavidLeblond · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    So this one won't break your back when you try to lift it?

    Here's hoping they make the controllers for average sized hands, not basketball player hands.

    1. Re:Smaller and more portable? by NanoGator · · Score: 1

      "So this one won't break your back when you try to lift it?"

      I'd be more inclined to complain about the weight of the XBOX if it didn't have a hard drive in it.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    2. Re:Smaller and more portable? by FidelCatsro · · Score: 1

      Compare the XBOX to a MacMini.
      I think you can see where im going with that.
      in essence the mini is a far more powerfull machine(except perhaps the graphics)
      Yet the xbox which whilst being a few years old i do admit , weight alot more than the mini and is a hell of alot louder..ok perhaps im not comparing oranges to oranges. but for example i do have a p3 laptop from around the same time , roughly the same specs as the xbox , yet its a fraction of the size , a fraction of the weight(that fraction probably being 1/4).
      I think we are on solid ground when we say that the origional xbox was poorly designed..

      I admit the mini is perhaps a poor example , but the laptop is not

      --
      The only things certain in war are Propaganda and Death. You can never be sure which is which though
    3. Re:Smaller and more portable? by FidelCatsro · · Score: 1

      My laptop was 800 at the time the xbox was origionaly 400 and even then was sold at a loss , so my laptop cost 800 remove the screen , half the ram , and remove the markup im pretty sure it wouldnt of cost that much more than 400.
      If i look around nowadays i can be a celeron or p3 700mhz laptop for around 200 maybe 250 .. which is i belive the current going rate for an xbox is it not

      --
      The only things certain in war are Propaganda and Death. You can never be sure which is which though
  2. The new xbox will take a by A+beautiful+mind · · Score: 1

    360 degree turn! Oh wait...

    --
    It takes a man to suffer ignorance and smile
    Be yourself no matter what they say
  3. I can't afford the Three Phase Power by SA+Stevens · · Score: 1

    I'll have to settle for a smallish XBox AS/400. . .

  4. This only makes sense by hunterx11 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Xbox LAN parties are more popular than for other consoles (at least where I live), even though they are the bulkiest by far. This would be really great.

    --
    English is easier said than done.
    1. Re:This only makes sense by xgamer04 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Xbox LAN parties are more popular than for other consoles (at least where I live)

      This is a given. The XBOX is the only current-gen console that has/had a (standard) networking port since day 1. (Yes, I know some PS2 games used Firewire for networking, and yes, I know they now ship with ethernet)

      --
      When you look at the state of the world, how can you not become a radical, liberal anarchist?
  5. Either the submitter is a troll or an idiot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    Probably both.

    That article is about technology in the IBM/360 mainframe, and if from 1964.

    1. Re:Either the submitter is a troll or an idiot by A+beautiful+mind · · Score: 4, Informative

      Mod this up!

      I verified the facts after downloading the 2.9MB pdf file.

      At the bottom of the first page you can make out the following words: "IBM Journal - April 1964". It does indeed mention the IBM/360 mainframe! Nice troll in the article.

      --
      It takes a man to suffer ignorance and smile
      Be yourself no matter what they say
    2. Re:Either the submitter is a troll or an idiot by Profane+MuthaFucka · · Score: 3, Insightful

      We suffered through all the bad jokes on April 1st. If this had been there, it would have been the only GOOD joke of the day. Truly funny.

      --
      Fascism trolls keeping me up every night. When I starts a preachin', he HITS ME WITH HIS REICH!
    3. Re:Either the submitter is a troll or an idiot by King+Fuckstain · · Score: 2, Interesting

      What does that make Zonk, who accepted the submission?

      --
      Update For for the dupe. Not going well. Appreciate all the hate mail. Really encourages improvement.
    4. Re:Either the submitter is a troll or an idiot by SewersOfRivendell · · Score: 1

      Mod parent up. Struth.

    5. Re:Either the submitter is a troll or an idiot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Well, the IBM/360 mainframe is still smaller and more portable then an Xbox.

    6. Re:Either the submitter is a troll or an idiot by wdr1 · · Score: 1

      The next timothy?

      *duck!*

      -Bill

      --
      SlashSig Karma: Excellent (mostly affected by moderatio
  6. Does anyone else by T-Ranger · · Score: 1

    Find it funny that an IBM microprocessor is going in a portable product named "360"?

    1. Re:Does anyone else by A+beautiful+mind · · Score: 1

      fakk. That's "IBM/360" not 3600.

      --
      It takes a man to suffer ignorance and smile
      Be yourself no matter what they say
  7. PSP Killer? by mungeh · · Score: 1

    Will this be like a PSP sized (or close to) full fledged console? Maybe they're realising they need to do to sony what they did to Apple ;)

    1. Re:PSP Killer? by Mavric1337 · · Score: 1

      By portible they mean easier to carry its still a console not a handheld.

  8. This is for the Japanese market... by Mr_eX9 · · Score: 1

    If there's any truth to this, the very small size is going to allow the Japanese to, literally, fit Microsoft's next system inside their homes. Besides being American and not having any dating sims or traditional RPGs, the Xbox's size was an actual factor that makede the Xbox a failure in Japan.

    Imagine putting a grand piano in your TV room and you'll know how the Japanese feel about putting Xboxes in their miniscule Tokyo apartments.

    As for the name: There is no official name for Microsoft's next system. All we know is the codename--"Xenon". All of this "Xbox 360," "Xbox Next," "Xbox 2/II" stuff is unconfirmed. We won't know what the real name is until MS decides to announce it.

    1. Re:This is for the Japanese market... by TupperTrenine · · Score: 1

      Yes, there is.

    2. Re:This is for the Japanese market... by Mr_eX9 · · Score: 1

      It's too stupid a name to possibly be true.

      Also, gamesindustry.biz is not official. "British sources." What the hell does that even mean? All Microsoft has said about the name is their "we do not comment on rumors or speculation" rhetoric. Therefore, we don't know what the official name is.

    3. Re:This is for the Japanese market... by antifoidulus · · Score: 1

      Besides being American
      You ever been to a movie theatre in Japan?
      Or ever bought a Japanese PC?
      Pretty much all there is nowadays are American films, all PCs come with Windows, an American OS, the console being American had NOTHING to do with it's sales!

      --
      Monstar L
  9. Portable? by Megane · · Score: 1
    So that means we'll have people wrapping their cords around the box and breaking the AC jack on the back, just like with the original Xbox?

    I guess Nintendo wasn't so stupid to still be using bricks after all.

    --
    #naabhaprzrag, #sverubfr-000, #agi-fcbafberq, negvpyr[pynff*=' negvpyr-ary-'] { qvfcynl: abar !vzcbegnag; }
    1. Re:Portable? by jkeyes · · Score: 1

      I think it's more like Microsoft did a piss poor job on QA testing with the AC Jacks and now they're living to regret it.

    2. Re:Portable? by assassinator42 · · Score: 1

      It's more like Foxlink made a crappy PSU. Foxlink, along with Thompson, were bad choices to buy parts from.

    3. Re:Portable? by jkeyes · · Score: 1

      Yeah but Microsoft is the one who gave it the final OK. So they're as much to blame as the others although I do see your point.

  10. Well I hope... by NanoGator · · Score: 1

    .. that they'll be using miniature media, then. Nintendo made a good choice with the Game Cube's mini-dvds. As Sony has proven, that's a great size for a portable device. If Nintendo decides to make a portable Game Cube, it won't have the minimum size of a Discman.

    --
    "Derp de derp."
    1. Re:Well I hope... by fr0dicus · · Score: 1

      I disagree. The Gamecube has had very little by way of large texture rich games, aside possibly from the very recent Resident Evil 4, a multi disk game. This comes in spite of its abilities, and the limited space on the Gamecube disk (less than the PSP's UMD!) means that it's simply impractical to release something like GT4 (a DVD9), a sandbox game with non-linear progression, as you'd be talking about constantly swapping four or five disks. The next generation will have even larger storage requirements.

    2. Re:Well I hope... by NanoGator · · Score: 1

      "I disagree. The Gamecube has had very little by way of large texture rich games"

      And that, somehow, is the fault of their media? Bullshit. PC Games typically come on one CD.

      The GameCube has superior texturing abilities than the PS2. I don't know why you're not seeing the games you want to (Lucky for you I haven't been on the GC market in a couple of years, so I can't tell you if they really do exist or if it's because of the developers or what...), but it's not due to space on the disc or capabilities of the hardware. Today's consoles have between 32 and 64 megs of RAM. The source images are typically compressed to far less than that for disc space. 1.5 gigs is more than enough texture space.

      Sorry, I don't buy that. Frankly, as a portable, the GameCube hardware would kick ass. That is, of course, assuming that it wouldn't eat batteries like it was candy. I have no idea of a low-power version of the processors can be made or not.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    3. Re:Well I hope... by fr0dicus · · Score: 1
      The last five PC games which used textured graphics (i.e. Football Manager doesn't count ;) I bought (Doom 3, Rome TW, WoW, Farcry and The Sims 2) came on at least 3 CD's, the content of which was uncompressed during the installation process to create installations of between 3.5GB and 8GB. So your argument is pretty invalid.

      The average PS2 game is at least a 2GB DVD, thanks in part to textures, FMV, much more audio choice, etc. The small size of Gamecube installation media suits Nintendo style games where including FMV or licensed audio content don't apply to their gaming styles. Xbox games are typically larger still, thanks to its superior texture performance.

      Moving forward into the next generation, textures and games are only going to get more complex, requiring more space.

      It's worth pointing out that UMD media is smaller in dimensions too, even counting its housing. All in all, Gamecube media is nice for speed of access, but shitty for including similar content to larger media, for obvious reasons. Many 'sandbox' games would simply not be possible, GTA, GT4, being good examples.

    4. Re:Well I hope... by Megane · · Score: 1
      came on at least 3 CD's, the content of which was uncompressed during the installation process to create installations of between 3.5GB and 8GB.

      Perhaps the next-next-generation consoles with multiple CPUs can start using some of their extra CPU power to run on-the-fly decompression. I wonder if the Cell subprocessors are general purpose enough to be used to run decompression independently.

      --
      #naabhaprzrag, #sverubfr-000, #agi-fcbafberq, negvpyr[pynff*=' negvpyr-ary-'] { qvfcynl: abar !vzcbegnag; }
  11. Not sure what you mean by NMerriam · · Score: 4, Funny

    I don't know how they could make the XBox any more portable. I took mine with me everywhere -- heck, I kept it in the trunk of my car all winter since it gave me improved traction on ice and snow!

    --
    Recursive: Adj. See Recursive.
  12. IBM Power PC Chip by Karem+Lore · · Score: 1
    Isn't this the same processor that's going into the new Playstation 3, except surrounded by cell processors?


    What stops the ability to add cell processors as an extension on the XBox 360? Extra card with a few cell processors on? That way the consoles longevity is vastly increased...slowing down? Add another cell...

    :D

    --
    When all is said and done, nothing changes...
    1. Re:IBM Power PC Chip by goMac2500 · · Score: 1

      The Playstation 3 just has a cell, no PowerPC970.

  13. I for one, welcome it's portability... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    ... but I'm a thief and shoplifter.

  14. In Soviet Japan... by solomonrex · · Score: 1

    The Xbox IS a miniscule Japanese apartment!

  15. Just a detail. by AzraelKans · · Score: 1

    The name is xbox next. not xbox 360. check it out www.register.com

    --
    Go ahead MOD my day!
    More opinions here
  16. Portable hey? by lordperditor · · Score: 1

    It's gonna be designed so you can wear it like a backpack, kinda like the ghostbusters pack. Gonna be a great leg work out.

  17. Sooooo.... by StormKrow · · Score: 1



    Anyone taking bets on how long it takes someone to install Linux on it?

    --
    Who cares about the ozone layer?...thanks to CFC's I can write my name......IN CHEESE!!!
    1. Re:Sooooo.... by StormKrow · · Score: 1

      ....that's not linux, imho.

      --
      Who cares about the ozone layer?...thanks to CFC's I can write my name......IN CHEESE!!!