Slashdot Mirror


Is Enterprise Heading To Canada?

Tycoon Guy writes "TrekToday reports that the TrekUnited fan campaign a few weeks ago partnered with a group of Canadian production companies to pitch a co-production deal for 'Star Trek: Enterprise' to Paramount. As part of this deal, production would be moved up to Canada, and TrekUnited and the Canadian group would share the costs of a fifth season with Paramount. Apparently Viacom executives are considering the proposal, despite another branch of Paramount saying the cancellation was final just a few days ago."

47 of 335 comments (clear)

  1. Canada by elid · · Score: 5, Funny

    To boldly go where no man has gone before :-)

    1. Re:Canada by mrchaotica · · Score: 4, Funny

      To boldly split infinitives that no one has split before!

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    2. Re:Canada by InvalidError · · Score: 2, Funny

      Canada?

      I've been there... actually, I'm still there and so are ~30M other people!

    3. Re:Canada by Kimos · · Score: 4, Funny

      Hope it works out! I'm not sure if all those American actors and production teams are used to working in our studio igloos. They'll probably have Enterprise spend lots of time visiting Andoria.

      Hahahahaha... *wipes tear* I love Canada.

    4. Re:Canada by fm6 · · Score: 5, Informative
      Need I point out that William Shatner is Canadian? Besides, a lot of U.S. TV shows are produced there. Including an unlikely number of SF shows: Stargate SG-1, X Files, Outer Limits, to name a few. Production costs are lower north of the 49th, for reasons I'm not entirely clear on.

      Of course, this is all more Trekkie lameness. Even if they can raise the money to produce the show, Viacom is not going to hand over one of its biggest properties to outsiders, even one that has not been making them money. When a property turns unprofitable they usually sit on it for years, hoping it becomes profitable if they hold it off the market long enough.

      They might agree to sell the Trek franchise. But not cheaply. If anybody can raise that kind of money, they should start their own SF franchise, not fritter it away trying to revive one that wore out years ago.

    5. Re:Canada by ReverendLoki · · Score: 3, Funny

      Ah yes, Canada, filming location for such sci-fi greats as Battlefield Earth and Pluto Nash...

      --
      09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
    6. Re:Canada by Talking+Goat · · Score: 2, Informative

      Split Infinitives

      There are many who present counterarguments against the split infinitive rule, the most common of which is the "don't try to apply Latin rules of grammar to English." Most people don't really mind splitting them anymore, and one could assume that, in the future, everyone would care about it even less so.

      --

      + G to tha Izzo, A to tha Tizee, Talking Giz-oat, Ya'll Bettah Feel Me... +
    7. Re:Canada by Fry+a+Lad+Up · · Score: 5, Funny
      I disagree, repeating something does not necessarily make it funnier or truer.

      You can say that again.

  2. Nice... by Stick_Fig · · Score: 2, Interesting

    If this actually works, and Arrested Development gets cancelled, I would drain my bank account for a third season of that.

    --
    ShortFormBlog: Writing a little. Saying a lot.
    1. Re:Nice... by UWC · · Score: 2, Informative
      Whoa, what's this about Arrested Development being cancelled? Has there been word of cancellation? I know of the reduced order this season. The reasoning did seem a little suspect (American Dad's (abysmal) premiere episode got good ratings.. you know, immediately after the Super Bowl, during which it had been heavily advertised...). At least the reduced order resulted in a hilarious gag in a recent episode (the reduced housing order from 22 to 18 homes, where Michael said "But we already had all the blueprints drawn up..." and the narrator cut in with "Actually, they didn't... but they would have.").

      Anyway, yeah, I'm mad enough that the almost certainly doomed to both critical and popular failure American Dad shortened the Arrested Development season on stupid grounds. If they cancel the show, I'll be even less enthused.

  3. Trek is getting long in the tooth by Spock+the+Baptist · · Score: 3, Insightful

    It needs a rest. At least on TV.

    --
    "Oh drat these computers, they're so naughty and so complex, I could pinch them." --Marvin the Martian
  4. The series is in a permanent vegetative state. by IvyMike · · Score: 4, Funny

    Please, can't we just let it die with dignity?

    1. Re:The series is in a permanent vegetative state. by elid · · Score: 5, Funny

      Why hasn't Congress passed a bill to force Paramount to keep Enterprise alive!?

    2. Re:The series is in a permanent vegetative state. by smackjer · · Score: 4, Funny

      Remember how well their last attempt went?

      --

      This is my sig. There are many like it, but this one is mine.
    3. Re:The series is in a permanent vegetative state. by Saeed+al-Sahaf · · Score: 2, Funny
      Please, can't we just let it die with dignity?

      That possibility has past.

      --
      "Who are in control, they are not in control of anything - they don't even control themselves!" - Glen Beck
    4. Re:The series is in a permanent vegetative state. by Average_Joe_Sixpack · · Score: 2, Funny

      Please, can't we just let it die with dignity?

      These "save the Enterprise" attempts are actually more entertaining than the show itself

    5. Re:The series is in a permanent vegetative state. by TexVex · · Score: 2, Funny

      Of course, if the Left Coast crazies get their way, eventually anything and everything will be the responsibility of the legislature and law enforcement to handle. Right now, this is funny: Dispatcher: Ma'am, we're not gonna go down there and enforce your Western Bacon Cheeseburger. (Also hit the audio link.) Twenty years from now it might not be.

      --
      Fun with Anagarams! LADS HOST, SHALT DOS. HAS DOLTS. AD SLOTHS, HATS SOLD. ASS HO, LTD.
    6. Re:The series is in a permanent vegetative state. by x0n · · Score: 2, Funny

      Well, if it won't die, at least let's agree to change the theme tune while we've got the chance.

      - Oisin

      --

      PGP KeyId: 0x08D63965
    7. Re:The series is in a permanent vegetative state. by k96822 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Let's change the lyrics.

      It's been a long episode,
      now Trek will dissapear.
      It's been a boring episode,
      and Trek's time is finally here.

      I will learn to turn my TV off at night,
      no Star Trek will be why.
      No, I'm not gonna see Star Trek no more,
      because of this Rick Berman guy.

      Cuz I've lost faith in my heart.
      Paramount has now forsake' me!
      I did choose to believe,
      the writers might be better lately.
      I have strength, to move on,
      to not let Star Trek so sedate me.
      I press off on my remote...
      I've lost faith,
      I've lost faith, faith in my heart!

      From what I can remember of the theme song, that seems to match and sum up how I feel about Enterprise. :-)

  5. good thing. by circusboy · · Score: 2, Interesting

    maybe they can find writers with a slightly wider world view...

    --
    -- it's ridiculous how many people misspell ridiculous... (damn, damn, damn...)
  6. I have the feeling ... by stinerman · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I think Paramount wants to kill off Enterprise because they're ready to start with something fresh after Berman/Braga are canned. It seems to me that a company that is consistantly rejecting bribes to keep a rather popular show on the air is either incredibly stupid, or has an ace up their sleeve and doesn't want anyone to know about it.

    Well, either that or they're trying to piss off the people who watch it via bittorrent (quite a few if I'm not mistaken).
    "Haha!!! That'll show you commie pirates! We'll just cancel whatever you like to download."

  7. Not worth saving. by EpsCylonB · · Score: 3, Funny

    When good geeks go bad.

  8. Actually by TheRealFixer · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Actually, if you read Paramount's statement carefully, it's worded a little oddly. It basically states that Enterprise on UPN is through. I thought it was strange they specified UPN, especially with all the talk about moving the show to another channel...

    1. Re:Actually by Anonymous+Monkey · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I'm going to be majorly irked if next year Enterprise is resurrected on some other network.

      Basically this would come off like a major publicity stunt and would make Enterprise even lamer than it is now.

      It would be cool if they would bring it back every two years for a five or six episode miniseries, but that would only work if they covered major trek events that are already established. The Romulian war, the Klingon War, First Contact with important groups, like the Trill....but that won't happen...it will be lame.

      Oh, and one last thing. LET IT DIE ALREADY!

      --
      We are the Borg...
  9. We're awesome, eh? by Kimos · · Score: 2, Funny

    Hah! And people ask why I love this country so much!

  10. As McCoy would say... by frank_adrian314159 · · Score: 2, Funny

    ... "It's dead, Jim."

    --
    That is all.
  11. Interesting... by nebaz · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Stargate-SG1 and Atlantis are both filmed in Vancouver. Farscape was Australia(?), is all Sci-Fi destined to be outsourced?

    --
    Rhymes that keep their secrets will unfold behind the clouds.There upon the rainbow is the answer to a neverending story
  12. They can have Enterprise by slusich · · Score: 2, Informative

    But only if they start exporting Corner Gas.
    Trust me, we'd be getting the better end of the deal.

    1. Re:They can have Enterprise by Ubergrendle · · Score: 2, Informative

      For Americans who don't get Canadian channels, Corner Gas is the first significantly successful Canadian-produced sitcom in decades. Its an ensemble cast, 'clean' humour (very little sexual innuendo), but very witty and intelligent. Set in small town Saskatchewan its very different than most US sitcoms which are typically family or big-city officeplace based. Interest by US networks is rising quickly as all the American import sitcoms have lost head-to-head (even against re-runs) -- Everyone Loves Raymond, Joey, and other insipid garbage. Unfortunately American Idol still beats it though... :(

      --
      John Maynard Keynes: "When the facts change, I change my mind. What do you do?"
  13. In the next exciting episode... by Marko+DeBeeste · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...Enterprise is ordered to deliver a mysterious cargo labelled only "WHIPS" to the planet Equus Mortis.

    --
    Faith: n. -- That human impulse that drives them to steal appliances when the power goes out
  14. Or, perhaps... by PornMaster · · Score: 2, Funny

    To boldly escape death in a manner no sci-fi television show has done before. ;)

  15. BSG by John+Harrison · · Score: 4, Informative

    I am pretty sure that Battlestar Galactica is filmed in Canada as well.

    1. Re:BSG by barc0001 · · Score: 3, Informative

      It is. They film Atlantis, Battlestar and SG-1 about a kilometer from my house in Burnaby, on the Vancouver city border. I see the trucks and the lot direction signs (Arrows with a three letter abbreviation for the show in question that tell the crews where to go) in my neighborhood all the time.

    2. Re:BSG by blincoln · · Score: 2, Informative

      I am pretty sure that Battlestar Galactica is filmed in Canada as well.

      Yes. The city on Caprica in the pilot was Simon Fraser University.

      When Boomer and Helo are walking through the abandoned city in an early episode, it's a CGI-enhanced downtown Vancouver. The quasi-future-Roman building is the library.

      The cinematic masterpiece The Sixth Day used both of those locations as well.

      --
      "...always new atoms but always doing the same dance, remembering what the dance was yesterday." -Richard Feynman
    3. Re:BSG by blincoln · · Score: 2, Funny

      Sci-Fi set designers and school architects are all Fascists at heart? That's disturbing...

      Fascists always have the best art departments, whether they're fictional or not.

      I mean, who got the cooler uniforms in the original BSG: the Viper Pilots, or the Space Nazis?

      It's the same everywhere. Jedi vs Sith. Autobot vs Decepticon. Hippie vs Grammaton Cleric.

      I think that part of the reason the *real* Nazis were able to have such influence over the Germans* are things like Speer and his Cathedral of Light, their military having uniforms that say "I am an evil person, and I will go forth and enjoy doing evil things in style," etc.

      The forces of Good need to replace their marketing team =P.

      * Yes, I realize their other factors and am ignoring them for the purposes of this non-serious discussion.

      --
      "...always new atoms but always doing the same dance, remembering what the dance was yesterday." -Richard Feynman
  16. Anyone see the news on the cast wrap party? by ravenspear · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The actors seem to know something you all don't.

    This show is as dead as a doornail right now and won't be coming back.

  17. Re:Enterprise Episodes all metric by softspokenrevolution · · Score: 3, Funny

    They also don't believe in money, they're clearly not Americans.

  18. Re:Oh Canada... by subl33t · · Score: 2, Funny

    X-Files definitely went south, in more ways than one, when Duchovny whined the show out of Canada.

  19. OMFG! by erroneus · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It's JUST a TV show!!!!!!

    Please... everyone backing this... this.... just can't go on! It's... insane!

    I think it's great that people can still be passionate about a cause, but let's make it something that really affects the world we live in! How about something like backing politics that fight against the ridiculously evil things going on now that are attempting to take your freedoms away?

    I know this will be marked as a troll or off-topic or something but I hope before it does, I actually reach someone.

    There's a bunch of people out there that could make a BIG difference if they pull together to make it happen. It's happening now but the cause is a freaking form of entertainment that lines the pockets of people who don't know or care about you in the least. On the other hand, there are causes that could really improve peoples lives.

    Truthfully, are we saying that the effort and resources used to save a TV show should be more significant than those spent in preserving our way of life or making it better? Are we REALLY just a bunch of people who would rather lose our freedoms just so that we can watch a TV show? (Bear in mind that there are plenty of religious fundies who would just LOVE to cancel Star Trek and any SciFi that questions the existance of their god.)

    This is one show... I wish the same effort was put into a cause that actually improves life in the here, now and future. I find it incredulous to witness people caring so little about our government and law and so much about something so trivial.

    1. Re:OMFG! by JudgeFurious · · Score: 2, Funny

      Yeah! We could fix things and change the world and stuff. We could be like heroes or something!

      Naaaaaaaah, lets go to White Castle, I'm hungry.

      --
      Appended to the end of comments you post. 120 chars.
    2. Re:OMFG! by zakezuke · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Please... everyone backing this... this.... just can't go on! It's... insane!

      Why not. I have to admit, I too question the sanity of these people who are digging deep in their pockets and spending so much time in order to rescue something from the rubbish bin, but I for one encourage them. We all, for the most part, have disposable income which we spend on entertainment, even those who only spend money on blank media.

      I for one don't see this as being a bunch of zelots trying to save their TV show, but rather people who have accepted the fact that they live in a capitilist republic and are using hard core cash in order to get their voices heard rather than simply accepting the arbitrary decision of some executive. After all, we the people are the consumer, it's because of our labor they have jobs in the first place. Albeit trivial, working in common cause is something that we need to be reminded we can do. Sure in the end, it's for a TV show, but it's TV that we pay for in the products we buy. It's our TV show.

      Are we REALLY just a bunch of people who would rather lose our freedoms just so that we can watch a TV show? (Bear in mind that there are plenty of religious fundies who would just LOVE to cancel Star Trek and any SciFi that questions the existance of their god.)

      Hey, if they want to get together and place newspaper ads how SciFi is inspired by the saten to convience people not to believe in God then more power too them. I would think it would be a petty trivial waste of time but we need pepole like this to exercise free speech. Just because I think they are freaking luddite lunitics doesn't mean they have any less rights then I do. Just because I believe what they are doing is a form of censorship doesn't mean I or anyone else has the right to censor them for being idiots.

      This is one show... I wish the same effort was put into a cause that actually improves life in the here, now and future. I find it incredulous to witness people caring so little about our government and law and so much about something so trivial.

      Perhaps people need a TV show that will focus on current issues, social injustice, rather than Paris Hilton milking cows and insulting country folks. While I don't think Enterprise has done the best job of doing this, others would disagree strongly. Good telivision can promote social awareness, and if someone wants to fight for this then more power too them.

      But most importantly, people getting behind a TV show bring people like you out of the woodwork reminding us that we can change the world if we just give it a chance.

      --
      There is no sanctuary. There is no sanctuary. SHUT UP! There is no shut up. There is no shut up.
  20. Obligatory whiny unreasonable fanboy response by mcc · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Besides, a lot of U.S. TV shows are produced there. Including an unlikely number of SF shows:

    I feel compelled to point out here that the X-Files didn't begin to suck until after they moved production from Canada to California...

    (To be fair, the first season in california was actally really good. The Sucking did not begin until the *second* California-filmed season. But we can chalk this up to inertia. Canadian inertia.)

  21. Teela Brown Syndrome by rewinn · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The Star Trek franchise has long struggled to escape the Teela Brown syndrome.

    Teela Brown, from Larry Niven's "Known World" series, embodies the concept that after an SF Universe has developed enough really, really keen ideas, authors have trouble coming up with interesting plots. Teela Brown was so effectively bred for Good Luck that nothing really bad could happen to her, which is boring from a plot standpoint (Niven found a great one-time exception to the rule, but that won't work for a series.)

    Original Star Trek: had a great sense of "Anything Can Happen" because no-one really knew what was Out There. And Anything DID happen, which was great for making stories! However, after the Treaty of Organia, the Gaurdian Of Time, the Doomsday Device, and Poor Lazarus jamming the door from alternate universes, it was getting harder and harder to come up with plausible threats. Thank goodness for the Klingons who were just powerful enough to be threatening whenever they were needed!

    ST:TNG wisely ignored the Teela Brown stuff ... for some reason the Organians didn't interfere with the Klingons, Cardassians, Borg, etc.... Creatures who could have been series-killers were given useful limitations, e.g. Q was a joker, the Borg both too far away to bother destroying the Federation in the near future and yet close enough to do it if they felt grouchy, and so on. A nice balance of threats kept open the possibilities.

    ST:DS9 overtly balanced the great powers; in some sense it was all about balancing the various cosmic threats & opportunities for the Federation. And ... most notably ... once the major conflicts were resolved (the Dominion went home and the Wormhole Aliens finished writing their novel) the series ended! There was nothing more to say on the subject, and hopefully we won't get a movie from it.

    ST: Voyager got a balance of problems by throwing the ship far far away from the Federation. Once again Anything Could Happen: Federation technology could be either useless or the perfect McGuffin, whenever it was needed. But once the underlying problem was solved --- the ship got Home --- the series was over, no movies please!

    ST: Enterprise got the only remaining really large era of uncertainty in the ST Universe: the past, prior to the Federation. However, we know how the story arc must end: The Federation is created. That puts a limit on the stories, e.g. the Earth can't really get blown up because someone would just have to re-build it so Kirk can get born there.

    ST: Canada So what is left? Where in the ST Universe is there enough uncertainty to make interesting plots?

    1. Re:Teela Brown Syndrome by mattbelcher · · Score: 3, Interesting
      ST: Canada So what is left? Where in the ST Universe is there enough uncertainty to make interesting plots?

      I'd like to see ST: Warbird. It would be set on a Romulan ship during the Kirk era and told from their point of view. The Federation would be meddling pricks standing in the way of the mission of spreading civilization to the barbarian hordes.

      --

      Shockwave Flash movies are the greatest thing to happen to non-sequitur humor since Japan.

  22. Re:Enterprise Episodes all metric by StalinsNotDead · · Score: 2, Funny

    One thing I never did understand is why when ever they are talking about distance, they always says kilometers never miles. Is there a reason for this? It is an American show.

    To make it sound more technical and futuristic to Americans maybe?

    --
    Thanks to the internet, we can now all die alone together! -SomeWoman
  23. Re:Star Trek has too many white people (Part 2) by StalinsNotDead · · Score: 2

    I'm not a Star Trek expert or anything. But wasn't there something called the eugenics wars in the Star Trek timeline?

    That might have something to do with the no certain ethnicities.

    --
    Thanks to the internet, we can now all die alone together! -SomeWoman
  24. Re:Canada Anybody Remember Airwolf? by davidsyes · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I used to like the US production of Airwolf, a former Bellasarius production. It died in the US market, losing Jan Michael Vincent, Ernest Borgnine and a few other characters, but was resurrected in Canada. Having watched Airwolf since about 1983 or 1984, I was surprised when in 1988 in Bahrain at the Admin Support Unit lounge and saw Airwolf on TV. But, I was initially dismayed at the glassy-screen-like camera treatment and the character changes. But, actually, I ended up liking it a bit later, despite it moving up north and using different formatting/ratios. One thing I did later liked was that the cinematography was different: The camera angles and movements and even focal length seemed un-US-like. I like it. The show then seemed "quicker" and "grittier" in some aspects.

    However, many US Trek fans and unions will probably bitch like hell at the move. If it can be moved to Canada, some will reason, then why can't the costs be brought down, and it kept here in the US. Well, maybe the Canadian studios do the same or better work for slightly less up-front cost. I dunno, but for a production to leave the US and go to another country, SOMEthing is being saved. Or, someone else wants the cachet of having Trek or (name your show) on their notched belt.

    Heck, even the Simpsons show has most of if not all of its artwork and animation done in South Korea. It costs a fraction of what it would in the US, and the Korean team is doing a great job, it seems.

    To the dismay of a number of Trek fans, and maybe even the cast, as with Airwolf, some or all of the cast and characters might change. I wouldn't be surprised if some elites or idealists in Canada tweak Enterprise to be more CanaPrize, making Star Trek's vision of the future include MORE of the real world, instead of Hollywood's US-market-centric/pleasing view of the world.

    For example:

    Voyager had Harry Kim, cuz "we gotta please the economically powerful and politically savvy Asian community..." yet while Tom Paris was a misfit inmate who caused the death of Starfleet personnel, he was eventually promoted to Lieutenant on Voyager, the ship, not just the show. Clean-nosed, sometimes defiant Harry Kim? Oh, he's done what NO ensign wants to do/be: Remain ensign for SEVEN YEARS on the same ship. His not receiving a field promotion by Janeway was NOT a Federation/UFP/Starfleet issue. I DARE say it was a US-centric, hollywood "thing" about keeping Garret Wang's character "down". (No, Kim's being promoed AFTER Voyager destroyed/set back the Borg does NOT count, since his promotion was a cheesy-assed future-scene, not part of Voyagers' Fans chronology...)

    Of course, that example won't fly when compared to DS9, since women were elevated, but aside from Cassidy Yates, most were not real-life ethnic minorities.

    As for Enterprise, Mayweather seems to gleefully smile at the console, from most of the episodes I've seen. It is true he and Hoshi had their little moments, one of Hoshi's being to copulate with an alien and "exchange some language"...

    I hope the Canadians take Trek where it's never been before: GLOBAL!

    It would be nice to see an Indian in a turbin on duty, in uniform. It would be NICE to see a Black/Asian couple aboard ship, instead of the all-too-beaten/submission-forced Anglo/Sino pairings. It would be nice to see an Iraqi, or Greek, or person from Tuvalu or Vunuato and identified as such, on the ship. It would be nice to see crew members in their off-duty, and NOT just the main ensemble.

    In Canada's hands, after about a year of some close-minded segment of the audience kvetching, Trek could TRULY improve, for instance, diving into details of a new and improved UN Security Council's fictional but pivotal role in rescuing the world from one-country-control, despite global markets theoretically dictating that one country cannot control the world.

    Yeh, up to this point, Trek has been a franchise of US origin, and it is a venture/business driven by demographics. Well, it's time for WORLD demo

    --
    Previously: "Linux... Toward the Sunrise..." Now: "Linux... Toward the-- No, now, part of Every Sunrise"