Slashdot Mirror


Firefox 1.0.3 and Mozilla Suite 1.7 Released

ESqVIP writes "Not long after Firefox 1.0.2 is out, there's a new public release. Just like the other 1.0.x releases, this is mostly a security fix. The release should hold for a few more days and we could also get bug 171349 (wrong icon displayed on Win9x) fixed. Mozilla Suite, on the other hand, has quite significant changes, some of them "imported" from Firefox. As announced before, this might be the Suite's last major release from the Mozilla Foundation."

33 of 339 comments (clear)

  1. Mozilla 1.7.*7* by Jack+Comics · · Score: 5, Informative

    Just a correction to the original story, Firefox 1.0.3 and Mozilla Suite 1.7.*7* was released today, not 1.7.

    --
    "We are all in the gutter, but some of us are looking at the stars." - Oscar Wilde
    1. Re:Mozilla 1.7.*7* by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      And here's a link to the correct readme file for Mozilla 1.7.7 .

    2. Re:Mozilla 1.7.*7* by alonsoac · · Score: 4, Informative

      Right, and the correct link to the new features is here. As you can see there is not much new in there. Except for the security fixes which do seem important.

  2. At least 1 fix by Pmkool1 · · Score: 5, Informative

    This should fix the Add/Remove Programs bug where installing a new version over the old version leaves the both entries in the Add/Remove list.

    Other than that, mostly just security issues.

    1. Re:At least 1 fix by Tim_F · · Score: 2, Informative

      All installing 1.0.3 did for me was leave 1.0.2 as the removable option. This hasn't really fixed anything it seems.

    2. Re:At least 1 fix by Tim_F · · Score: 2, Informative

      Scratch that. All is now well in the world of Add/Remove programs.

      So what else did they fix?

  3. Windows add/remove programs... by EnronHaliburton2004 · · Score: 2, Informative

    Woot!

    In Windows Add/Remove Programs, I now only see one version of Firefox-- 'Firefox 1.0.3'.

    This will please many people.

  4. Sigh. by Greger47 · · Score: 4, Informative
    I'm sure they got a million submissions about this. Why do they insist on picking the worst one?

    It's Mozilla 1.7.7, there's nothing new we didn't already knew about. The update has the same security fixes (scroll down) as the new Firefox release, that's all...

    /greger

  5. Re:How does this stack up to IE? by esbjorn · · Score: 4, Informative

    Linux has had hibernation for a long time.
    It is included in the main kernel, and I use it every day. Works flawlessly.

  6. Re:1.0.7?? What about 1.1PR? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    1.1 PR should be already out by now? What gives?

    It says preview release for developers. There's still plenty of April left for this if it doesn't already exist. The normal preview release isn't scheduled until May. The end of May is a month and a half away. Also, you may have missed the part at the top of the table: "This is, as always, subject to change.".

  7. damn.. have to download it again !?!? by _Qiang_ · · Score: 1, Informative

    i just upgraded from 0.8 to 1.0.2 two days ago.
    found some great extentions on firefox site but i have these two problems.

    I have to give up an extention 'IE view' which is not supported anymore.

    the TBE (tab browsing extintion) has one feature I couldn't find in the new one. where is the "bring back the closed tab" feature ?

    from 0.8 to 1.0.2, I haven't felt any significiant improves besides the new extentions.

  8. Re:Damn shame by ydnar · · Score: 3, Informative

    Ctrl+W
    Ctrl+R
    Ctrl+U

    Or you could write an extension...

  9. Re:How does this stack up to IE? by prandal · · Score: 3, Informative

    I expect a lot better from Slashdotters than this "naive user" style bug report. Which operating system? Which patch level, which version of Adobe Reader? Adobe Reader 7.01 and Firefox 1.0.3 on a fully patched Windows XP work flawlessly together for me.

  10. Re:hold for a few more days? by TomC2 · · Score: 3, Informative

    I doubt that Win9x users (like me!) would say that - seeing as we've missed out on the IE pop-up blocker included with XP service pack 2, and Win95 won't run IE6 at all, only IE5.5. So franky Firefox is now the only decent browser for Win9x unless you want to pay money for Opera (or have an ad banner)

    I do admit that the wrong icon being displayed is a fairly trivial issue, however.

  11. Customize toolbar and creating search keywords by jeti · · Score: 3, Informative

    1. Select View->Toolbars->Customize... from the main menu and drag the search field from the toolbar.

    2. Create bookmarks with keywords for your searches. Several are predefined. If you want to f.e. have a quick way to search goggle images, go to images.google.com and right-click the entry field. Select "Add a Keyword" from the context menu, and enter "gi" into the Keyword field of the dialog.

    Typing "gi whales" into the address bar now searches google for images of whales.

  12. Re:Problems with the Moz and FF plugin interface: by scragz · · Score: 4, Informative

    The problem with Open Source software is that there is no one to say, "This bug MUST be fixed, before anything else is done." OO people work on what they want, and the less interesting stuff, like fixing someone else's bugs, doesn't get attention.

    It's called a realease blocker. At least in the Mozilla world, there are plenty of them for every major release that, err, block it from being released.

  13. Planned for Firefox 1.1 by jeti · · Score: 4, Informative

    This feature is being worked on and should ship with Firefox 1.1 .

  14. Re:Firefox startup time... by jcupitt65 · · Score: 4, Informative

    At the moment the Mozilla suite has a more recent version of gecko under the hood. The next firefox (1.1 I think it's going to be called, due out in a few months) will be switching to this and get these improvements too. It'll fix some bugs too, eg. the slashdot rendering problem.

  15. Re:1.7 by rookworm · · Score: 1, Informative
    Could you be more specific in your summaries please?

    FYI, 1.7.7

    --
    The toad can't burp - and for some reason can't fart either, so it swells up and eventually explodes. --Anonymous Coward
  16. Re:My only request by drendite · · Score: 5, Informative

    this has been fixed in the latest trunk.. afaik we won't see it until 1.1

  17. Re:How does this stack up to IE? by BWGames · · Score: 2, Informative

    It might just be me, but Firefox has a massive memory leak on my system - I don't close it down, but having it consume 150meg after a day of being run, is worrying.
    I don't want to go back to IE but...

  18. Re:Firefox startup time... by adam1101 · · Score: 5, Informative

    False: firefox 1.0.3 has gecko 1.7.7, same as the current Seamonkey suite. Only the unreleased 1.8beta suites have newer versions, but there won't be an official 1.8 suite release by the Mozilla foundation. Firefox 1.1 will be the official release of gecko 1.8. There is a group of old Seamonkey developers working on a release of the suite 1.8 (under a different name), but I doubt they'll have something ready before firefox 1.1.

    If you want to count beta's, the firefox trunk nightlies have gecko 1.8 as well.

  19. Re:Slashdot still renders incorrectly by juhaz · · Score: 2, Informative

    ...in the new Mozilla 1.7.7 I installed just seconds ago. Wasn't a fix for this made available a long time ago?

    Yes. But the fix caused a regression, and without knowing how many sites it would affect, both Firefox 1.0 and Mozilla 1.7 branches decided to leave it out.

    Those regressions have now been fixed too, so it will be fixed in 1.1 and 1.8.

  20. Re:How does this stack up to IE? by ssj_195 · · Score: 2, Informative
    This is very common, and happens on both Windows and Firefox. It's a very well known and long standing bug (sorry, I don't have bugtraq numbers, but there are many of them). Apparently, it has recently been fixed in the development version (or at least, greatly alleviated), but the fixes won't be part of a "proper" release until Firefox 1.1.

    In the meantime, just do what I do - install SessionSaver, and close Firefox down and re-open when memory consumption gets too large.

  21. Re:What They need to Update by adam1101 · · Score: 2, Informative

    4.7MB for Firefox is pretty modest. Netscape Navigator 3 (released in 1996) was already over 3MB, Netscape Navigator 4 (1997) was over 9MB for the browser alone!

  22. Re:But I just got done emerging Firefox 1.0.2 damm by TeknoHog · · Score: 2, Informative

    Next time, just emerge mozilla-firefox-bin. (Except if you need fancy compile-time settings.)

    --
    Escher was the first MC and Giger invented the HR department.
  23. Re:How does this stack up to IE? by Budrick · · Score: 2, Informative

    Automatic updates tend to be staggered these days. I've no idea why but they seem to need a bit of extra time to work out problems when auto-updating. It'll probably be along in a couple of days.

    I think the point is moot for most people here though. You can just download the installer and install over the top of existing versions - the installer's finally been fixed to remove duplicate entries in Add/Remove Programs under Windows.

  24. Re:I still prefer the suite by bunratty · · Score: 3, Informative

    Mozilla 1.8 will be released, just under a different name with QA done by the Seamonkey group instead of the Mozilla Foundation.

    --
    What a fool believes, he sees, no wise man has the power to reason away.
  25. Re:My only request by rfunches · · Score: 2, Informative

    trunk = nightlies? My FF is at 111MB with 2 FF windows and a total of 16 tabs open. Even closing all but one window and one tab won't do much to the memory usage.

  26. Re:Firefox startup time... by Chanc_Gorkon · · Score: 2, Informative

    What Slashdot renering problem? I have never had a problem with Slashdot rendering in any version of Firefox.

    --

    Gorkman

  27. Re:For Version 1.0.4 PLEASE by Denyer · · Score: 3, Informative
    Strictly speaking it isn't a bug. It is an annoying default behaviour for most people, though.

    Hit 'about:config' and toggle 'browser.xul.error_pages.enabled' to true.

    --
    Ph-nglui mglw'nafh Gates M'dna wgah'nagl fhtagn.
  28. Re:For Version 1.0.4 PLEASE by CTho9305 · · Score: 2, Informative

    XUL Error pages are in pretty bad shape in 1.7.x and 1.0.x - there's a reason they're off by default. For 1.1 and 1.8, many of the bugs have been fixed, and they work a lot better.

  29. Re:hold for a few more days? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative
    W[ho]TF modded this insightful? Funny, yes. Insightful, not by a long shot.

    Obviously 99.999% of /.ers got the joke, but for both of the people on the planet that didn't get it, Win 9x comprises nearly a quarter of the market. This is especially the case from true PC gamers and dual-booters (and even emulators if you want to count those) who need a DOS-based Windows for compatibility reasons.