Slashdot Mirror


Microsoft Demands Removal Of Longhorn Images

bonch writes "After the previously reported release of the Longhorn beta at this year's WinHEC, Neowin and other Windows sites are reporting that Microsoft is going around sending legal letters demanding removal of Longhorn Build 5048 screenshots. Paul Thurrott discusses it on his site, stating that Microsoft never told anyone beforehand not to post screenshots of the publicly available beta, and links to the new galleries he has up now. 'Enjoy it while it lasts.'"

62 of 540 comments (clear)

  1. First Post People Suck by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    Maybe Microsoft is afraid Apple will steal some of its features?[1]
    Or perhaps Microsoft just needs more time to cover up what they stole?[2]

    On slightly different note but on topic, did anyone else notice how the Recycle Bin icon's shadow slants left while the text's shadow slants right?

    [1]hahahahahahaaaaahahahaa
    [2]most likely imho

    1. Re:First Post People Suck by RealityMogul · · Score: 5, Funny

      Did anyone else notice the translucent plastic effect the Start button has now. Now that's innovation!

    2. Re:First Post People Suck by st3v · · Score: 4, Insightful

      "...did anyone else notice how the Recycle Bin icon's shadow slants left while the text's shadow slants right?"

      Is it just me, or is the recycle bin icon also butt ugly? Actually, I think the whole GUI looks terrible. Windows XP/2000 looks nicer than this crap. All these screenshots look like Windows XP SP3 with an ugly skin.

      I don't see how Microsoft could have progressed so little since the release of Windows XP in 2001.

    3. Re:First Post People Suck by Mortanius · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Because obviously Microsoft has put all their work into the way Longhorn looks, rather than under-the-hood things.

      Screenshots tell all. Microsoft is asleep at the wheel.

    4. Re:First Post People Suck by CokeBear · · Score: 5, Funny
      did anyone else notice how the Recycle Bin icon's shadow slants left while the text's shadow slants right?

      of course it does. recycling is the domain of left leaning hippies, therefore the left leaning recycling bin. Real Men use a trash can.

      --
      Reality has a liberal bias
    5. Re:First Post People Suck by Sinus0idal · · Score: 4, Funny

      I liked the classy way the Shut Down button doesn't fit on the menu. "Shut Do..." Do what!!!?

    6. Re:First Post People Suck by Gubbe · · Score: 5, Informative

      Looks like it was #1 that was the correct answer:

      "1:07pm
      OK, Microsoft has provided its explanation. What it boils down to is that there may be certain technologies in the Longhorn Developer Preview build for which Microsoft has not filed patent applications, and the confidentiality provisions protect or mitigate the company's filing rights. One of the focus areas of IP protection has been user interface, hence Microsoft cannot permit screenshots of the UI. I was told that Microsoft had left its Media Center user interface unprotected, and that UI has been stolen and replicated in numerous other places. They don't want that to happen to Longhorn."


      From the Thurrott link.

    7. Re:First Post People Suck by elsilver · · Score: 5, Funny
      Actually, this is a case of Microsoft stealing yet another of Apple's features... "the sue the blogger for posting pictures" feature.

      E.

    8. Re:First Post People Suck by guet · · Score: 4, Insightful

      One of the focus areas of IP protection

      Yeah, because the UI was really the highlight of the features shown, what with the truncated titles, execrable icons from the 1990s, and dreary grey tinge. Lots of new ideas in there.
      ?

      This is a damage limitation exercise because of all the bad press. When even your fan sites are calling it a 'train wreck' any publicity is bad publicity.

    9. Re:First Post People Suck by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

      B.S. If they have not filed a patent on a "feature" which would otherwise be patentable, then they have the full one year from publication protection afforded to all inventors who publish before filing. So, it looks like Microsoft's "correct" answer is full of shit. And they fully expect the general public's ignorance of IP law to shield them from being caught for their deception.

      It's plain and simple folks. The reason they don't want the pictures to be seen any more widely is because everyone is in agreement. Longhorn sucks.

      That Microsoft would lie to the buying public is SOP.

  2. Microsoft is pointing fingers wrong way... by yagu · · Score: 5, Insightful

    To me this pretty much looks like Microsoft ran the screenshots up the metaphoric flagpole and didn't like the salutes. Instead of spinning it as beta (which we in the IT community have come to understand, if not respect) and appropriately rough-edged, Microsoft apparently has decided to take the low road and is going to hold its breath until it turns blue (irony). Too bad, the images do suck, but I think Microsoft in its eagerness to prove "me too" for having a cool new OS stumbled mightily this time. Fortunately, having $50B petty cash makes recovery from these inconveniences convenient.

    1. Re:Microsoft is pointing fingers wrong way... by panaceaa · · Score: 5, Informative

      Microsoft only has $34B in cash now. They've spent 25 billion over the past few years on buying back their own stock and giving a bunch back to investors in a one-time dividend.

    2. Re:Microsoft is pointing fingers wrong way... by 0x461FAB0BD7D2 · · Score: 5, Funny

      Since you asked, they get by by cutting corners.

    3. Re:Microsoft is pointing fingers wrong way... by pla · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Instead of spinning it as beta

      I think the problem here comes from just how not beta Microsoft considers the overall GUI shown in those screenshots...

      They promised to "wow" us all with a whole new Windows experience, and gave us exactly what most of us expected all along - XP with a makeover, which itself amounted to nothing more than Win95 with a makeover.

      And right about now, we have a whole lot of people at MS updating their resumes as a result of the massively underwhelmed response from not just "those Linux freaks" who would damn Billy G even if he found a cure for AIDS, cancer, and the flu all in the same day, but from fairly pro-Windows media who paid just to fly to see a demo of a beta of MS's Next Big Thing (tm)

    4. Re:Microsoft is pointing fingers wrong way... by ajs · · Score: 5, Funny
      "looks like Microsoft ran the screenshots up the metaphoric flagpole and didn't like the salutes"

      Didn't like it?! You must be joking!

      Think of it this way:
      MS Exec 1: We need to get the word out about Longhorn. We want people to see it!
      MS Exec 2: Well, how does Apple get out the word about each release?
      MS Exec 1: They leak rumors and then sue anyone who publishes them... oh... right!
      It's not a new tactic, but it never really gets old either....
    5. Re:Microsoft is pointing fingers wrong way... by Golias · · Score: 5, Funny

      I hate MS as much as the next guy, but only a real idiot would call XP "Win95 with a makeover" and actually mean it.

      Be honest and fair. XP is really NT 3.51 with a makeover, and you know it.

      --

      Information wants to be anthropomorphized.

    6. Re:Microsoft is pointing fingers wrong way... by yagu · · Score: 4, Insightful

      lol

      It's probably one of the things I MOST don't get about Microsoft. For all of the money they can throw at things they sure don't seem to end up with huge quality return on investment. For me it's evidence of one of two things (I'm sure there's more to consider...): Either 1) You can't solve quality issues by throwing money at them, or, 2) Microsoft doesn't put enough money and/or effort into solving their quality issues. (I suspect a bit of the latter since their responsibility, Gates' and Ballmer's disclaimers aside, is to the share holders and if Microsoft can continue to rake in the profits with marginally competitive technology so much the better....)

      I think eventually (as I've posted many times in my somewhat anti-Microsoft bent) the frustration of the consumers coupled with the continued resentment of the IT community will be the downfall of Microsoft. However that downfall won't come for a very long time considering how embedded Microsoft is in the entirety of our technology universe.

    7. Re:Microsoft is pointing fingers wrong way... by timster · · Score: 3, Insightful

      IP protection on a GUI? Haven't we been down this road before... like in Apple v. Microsoft?

      --
      I have seen the future, and it is inconvenient.
    8. Re:Microsoft is pointing fingers wrong way... by jocknerd · · Score: 4, Funny

      Once again, Microsoft copies Apple.

    9. Re:Microsoft is pointing fingers wrong way... by dioscaido · · Score: 3, Informative

      Build 5048 is not a beta. It is a stripped down version of Longhorn that contains enough of the system framework for hardware developers to being writing their drivers. This is WinHEC, remember? Beta is planned for August. The features I work on, and most of the features I've seen in other group's demos, were not merged into this build.

  3. Heh... by Moth7 · · Score: 3, Funny

    This has to be my most appropriate experience of the "Nothing to see here, move along" error =)

  4. I bet by the_skywise · · Score: 5, Insightful

    if the reviewers LIKED it, those screen shots could've stayed up...

    1. Re:I bet by ShaniaTwain · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Yeah, or maybe this is just a way to get people to look at them.

      "Dont look at this! This here! Right here, dont look at it!"

      I know I wouldnt have looked if it werent for this story, and now I'm sorry I did.

    2. Re:I bet by badasscat · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Might as well just use one of the many "theme" generators for XP to create a longhorn theme and call it identical.

      As soon as your copy of XP can keep two folders auto-sync'd over a network, then you give me a call. Longhorn can do that, and it's one of the big features I'm waiting for.

      Seriously, I can't believe how many people here are focusing on the visuals. Who the hell cares? It looks fine to me, just as XP does. I don't fire up an OS to look at all the pretty colors, I fire up an OS to run applications. Longhorn has a whole mess of security improvements that make it more like Linux (i.e. non-root accounts are actually somewhat functional, so people might actually want to use them), it has smart folders that automatically look for documents matching parameters you specify, it has the aforementioned network auto-sync feature that is sorely needed for anyone who owns multiple PC's (useful for things like backup, media centers, etc.).

      And those are just the features I'm personally excited about. Even without WinFS, this is a significant upgrade to Windows XP.

      Before you start thinking I'm some sort of MS shill, look up my history for the last Longhorn-related post I made, wherein I bitched about MS trying to sell us something other than the desktop metaphor. I'm actually happy MS is not trying to reinvent the UI wheel after seeing these screens. XP works perfectly well enough for me from a UI standpoint; it is just missing some obvious features that a modern OS really has to have in this day and age.

      People go nuts about a 0.1 incremental upgrade to the Mac OS, and are only too happy to pay $130 for it. Longhorn is a far more important and comprehensive upgrade than Tiger and all anyone can say about it is how much it sucks because it looks like Windows? Get over it. It is Windows - what the hell did you expect? If you buy your OS based on looks and you don't like the look of Longhorn, why do you even care anyway? I would think you'd already be using a different OS as it is.

    3. Re:I bet by ryanw · · Score: 3, Informative
      Longhorn is a far more important and comprehensive upgrade than Tiger
      All the features you raved that Longhorn WILL HAVE, TIGER HAS. If you're all stoked on longhorn, then you'd be flippin out about Tiger. With tiger you get to stare at your pixel perfect rendered desktop while using features needed to maintain sanity in this 'paperless environment'.
  5. Microsoft again lacks inovation! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Sheesh. Microsoft can't even be original in this -- Apple was way ahead of them.

    Apple rumors aren't considered confirmed until there's been at least one notice from Apple Legal.

  6. Maybe its for public safety? by ShaniaTwain · · Score: 4, Funny

    .. Have people been turning to stone?

  7. The EULA says don't do it by winkydink · · Score: 4, Insightful

    So, if you do and they then sic the attack-lawyers on you, why are you surprised? Because they didn't do it previously? Guess what? They can pick and choose.

    --

    "I'd rather be a lightning rod than a seismometer." -Ken Kesey

    1. Re:The EULA says don't do it by selectspec · · Score: 4, Funny

      In the EULA section Corinthians 12:8 it clearly states that publishing screanshots is prohibited.

      --

      Someone you trust is one of us.

  8. NDA? by Ransak · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Did the people that put up these screenshots sign a NDA? If so, I'd love to see it.

    If not, Microsoft is using it's multimillion dollar legal department to bully people into doing/thinking what they want.

    Hold on a minute while I try to not act suprised.

    --
    "Powers. I have them."
  9. I have a better idea... by nother_nix_hacker · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...give a four year old some marker pens (primary colours) and ask them do draw a UI. There's your screenshots. :)

  10. I'm not surpised.. by Anita+Coney · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The screen shots I've seen so far have been UTTERLY unimpressive. Essentially XP with a different color scheme. IE 6, Media Player 10, etc, etc, etc.

    It's hard to hype a product when there is so much evidence showing the opposite.

    --
    If someone says he and his monkey have nothing to hide, they almost certainly do.
    1. Re:I'm not surpised.. by Anita+Coney · · Score: 4, Funny

      Yeah, my guess is that they're waiting for Tiger to be released so they'll know exactly what to put into Longhorn.

      --
      If someone says he and his monkey have nothing to hide, they almost certainly do.
  11. Purchase Music? by NullProg · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Look at the screen shop showing "My Music".
    Now look at the top left explorer bar and see the link that says "Purchase Music".

    Could this be why? Where does the link go? Isn't that illegal in the settlement with the justice dept/EU.

    Just curious,
    Enjoy

    --
    It's just the normal noises in here.
  12. Screenshots? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    Screenshots? Who the hell needs screenshots when you can get the entire operating system yourself?

  13. EULA again by ajaf · · Score: 5, Informative


    "Apparently, there is a condition in the EULA preventing people from posting screenshots. Nobody saw anything like that."

    http://www.windowsitpro.com/Articles/Index.cfm?Art icleID=46188

    --
    ajf
    1. Re:EULA again by sp5 · · Score: 3, Interesting
      "Apparently, there is a condition in the EULA preventing people from posting screenshots. Nobody saw anything like that."

      http://www.windowsitpro.com/Articles/Index.cfm?Art icleID=46188

      Is this enforceable? I seem to recall that journalists where permitted to include works that are copyrighted (including screenshots and things of that nature) for the purpose of a review.

      IANAL, but it seems to me that if Microsoft was so worried about people posting screenshots they should have had everyone sign non-disclosure agreements instead of sticking it in the EULA.

      -sp-

  14. What is Microsoft trying to hide? by mcwop · · Score: 4, Interesting
    Longhorn, looks pretty much the same as current Windows. Wait I think I answered my own question. Microsoft does not people to see the screens because the screens are boring, and unlikely to generate much excitement

    So in Longhorn, can I drag documents onto a button on the taskbar to open it, rather than holding the mouse down waiting for the app to appear?

    --

    "I don't think it's selfish, to eat defenseless shellfish." -NOFX

    1. Re:What is Microsoft trying to hide? by cpeterso · · Score: 4, Informative


      This Longhorn beta might looks a lot like Windows XP, but Microsoft is probably saving the cool GUI changes until the last beta or RTM milestone. Betas of earlier Windows version did the same thing.

  15. Now that really is funny... by Eminence · · Score: 4, Interesting
    ...before it was just a bunch of pathetic screens of what looked like skinned XP, no earthshaking technology, no innovation, nothing. Now, it's a prized intellectual property. Oh, come on...

    Interesting, BTW, how all those car magazines get away with pictures of pre-production prototytpes snapped during their road-tests. Somehow, car manufacturers don't see a problem there.

    Having said that, if he agreed not to do it he shouldn't. Period.

  16. Too many lawyers into IT by what+about · · Score: 3, Insightful

    This is going to be the problem in IT, too much legal messing about, both in forms of submarine patents and EULA with incredible conditions.

    From the Blog

    As I mentioned to him in an email, I am a legitimate member of the trade press and would never have agreed to an expensive trip to Seattle if I knew that Microsoft was, for the first time, mysteriously not letting people post photos of a publicly-released Windows build. This is information that would have been helpful weeks ago, not after the fact.

    Honestly, how many of you read fully the EULA that comes with the SW you download ?

    What if at some point a company tells you that you have violated their EULA and demands money ?

    Sadly, the law, does not obey to "common sense" and "by law" you will be obliged to pay...

    Solutions ?, maybe an EULA that is no longer than 25 lines (80 characters each long) ?

  17. A couple more days for Apple to cram... by chia_monkey · · Score: 4, Funny

    I guess Microsoft is afraid that Apple would snag that oh-so-yummy Longhorn interface. With a couple days 'til Tiger launches, Apple could put in a serious cram session to update the look. Cram Apple, cram!!!

    --

    "He uses statistics as a drunken man uses lampposts...for support rather than illumination." - Andrew Lang
  18. TAKE THEM DOWN! by keyrat+rafa · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Don't let them see we haven't changed anything yet!

  19. a new trend by John+Seminal · · Score: 4, Insightful
    if the reviewers LIKED it, those screen shots could've stayed up...

    In some ways this is like when a movie is about to be released, but the studio will not let the critics screen the film. If a studio knows their $70,000,000 film sucks that bad, they know better than to let critics screen it. It is time to get the PR people over to yahoo and amazon to leave 5 star reviews.

    Plus, the screen shots MS gave out, there was nothing special there. Nothing secret. Nothing new. If someone did not tell me it was a new Windows, I would have guessed someone got a new wallpaper for their XP machine.

    --

    Rosco: "If brains were gunpowder, Enos couldn't blow his nose."

  20. thurrot by whoisshe · · Score: 5, Funny
    to quote Thurrot [on microsoft longhorn]: 'This has the makings of a train wreck.'

    this is perhaps the only thing thurrot has ever written that i've liked.

    --
    who is she? leave a comment!
  21. Guaranteeing wide distribution. by ackthpt · · Score: 4, Insightful
    To me this pretty much looks like Microsoft ran the screenshots up the metaphoric flagpole and didn't like the salutes.

    Meanwhile telling people to get them off their websites is a guaranteed method of making sure everyone will download them and save them and look them over much more critically, trying to figure out what Ms doesn't want them to see. Pretty effective marketing, really.

    --

    A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
  22. Maybe "Shut Do..." is confidential IP by MooseByte · · Score: 4, Funny

    "They promised to "wow" us all with a whole new Windows experience"

    And they succeeded. I can honestly say their new "Shut Do..." menu option in the Beta truly did make me go "wow".

    As in "Wow, WTF are they thinking?"

    Seriously, just how much work do they have left on this "Beta"? Getting kind of late in the game to have such glaring UI problems.

    1. Re:Maybe "Shut Do..." is confidential IP by Dink+Paisy · · Score: 3, Insightful
      My guess is they are thinking something like, "No one will think that this is finished if we show something that doesn't even have the words shut down correct."

      A nice strategy for presentations and demos is to make missing functionality look strange. That way when you give someone a screenshot and they see that the "Uplodes tests TOO DATABAse" button is bright orange and in an ugly font, they ask why, and you get to explain that that part isn't finished yet. It avoids the problem of people thinking that everything is finished just because there is a mock-up of the UI.

      --

      Whoever corrects a mocker invites insult;
      whoever rebukes a wicked man incurs abuse.
      --Proverbs 9:7
    2. Re:Maybe "Shut Do..." is confidential IP by snuf23 · · Score: 3, Funny

      Aw who cares. It's the most intuitive GUI evar!
      I mean consider this a moment:

      Have you ever noticed that when you click the "Start" button, the first option on the list is "Shut Down"?

      Brilliant.

      --
      Sometimes my arms bend back.
  23. Apple by gandell · · Score: 3, Funny
    Given that the beta GUI is horrid, I've no doubt that MS will improve it...well, then again...look at XP...

    Nevertheless, I really wonder how many of MS' GUI designers actually consider function over pretty colors. Not to be an Apple fanboy (I don't even own a mac), but OSX's GUI seems to have function as well as slickness. I'm anxious to see if Longworn :D will do the same.

    --
    Mercy was given to me by Christ...I must give the same to others.
  24. Re:Great by antibryce · · Score: 4, Insightful


    1.) Comparing a leaked copy of the OS to screenshots is silly.
    2.) Apple didn't sue over the leaked copy of Tiger. They watermarked it and caught the guy through technical means.
    3.) I think you seriously need to rethink your definition of "right to know" as it is nothing like what anyone I know uses. See I have a "right to know" MS is dumping toxic waste in my backyard. I don't have a "right to know" anything I want about their unreleased product.

    As for harming MS, if you can't see how these screenshots do that you haven't been reading the critical reviews of it. It has been widely panned as actually managing to make XP's interface look positively sleek and elegant.

  25. Re:Are you sure? by Phisbut · · Score: 3, Informative
    All this almost makes me want to switch to a Mac, if only they were not so bloody expensive. I just can't get myself to pay $1500+ for a computer. I've never spent more than $500 on any machine I have ever owned, with the exception of my laptop.

    Welcome to the world of the MacMini.

    --
    After 3 days without programming, life becomes meaningless
    - The Tao of Programming
  26. Re:Speaking as a recent OS X convert... by netsphinx · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I agree. In XP (my employer runs Windows only), I use the gray theme with a clean desktop image. In OS X Panther (my laptop),I use the silver/silver theme. I'm a designer, I work with a lot of color, and I need neutral edges and backdrops. Ever try to color correct orange tones against a candy-bright blue?

    The human eye needs resting space. White is too bright from a CRT or LCD monitor, so give us a good-looking, uncluttered gray option and type that sets well against it.

    I've been thinking a lot about interface design in Flash and html, and I seem to see the OS-level interfaces picking up stylistic elements of popular websites (Adobe and Macromedia jump to mind). Is it just me, or has the thin-line, dove-to-charcoal gray trend gained momentum recently?

  27. NOT A BETA, stripped down for driver dev by dioscaido · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Build 5048 is not a beta. It is a stripped down version of Longhorn that contains enough of the system framework for hardware developers to being writing their drivers. This is WinHEC, remember?

    Beta is planned for August. The features I work on, and most of the features I've seen in other group's demos, were not merged into this build.

  28. Nice Selective Copying by h2d2 · · Score: 3, Informative

    Nope, I'm not talking about MS copying Apple... I'm talking about the submitter, who carefully left out this important point from Thurrott's post:

    "Apparently, there is a condition in the EULA preventing people from posting screenshots."

    You may continue MS bashing now...

    --
    Mozilla stole tabs from NetCaptor. So what? Right?
  29. Microsoft Copies Apple's Bad Ideas by russotto · · Score: 3, Interesting

    OK, is it just me, or has Microsoft taken the Apple idea of barely-distinguishable icons for minimize/maximize/close, and made it even worse by making two of them the same color AND made them butt ugly.

    The Motif/Windows Classic version may be butt ugly, but at least they're easily distinguishable and big enough to click easily.

  30. You are missing the point, dude. by LibertineR · · Score: 5, Insightful
    I have been a Windows user since Version 2.0. I have lived through every damn bug, every blue screen, every fucked installation, every bit of lost data and more.

    And as the years go by, my wife's Mac looks better and better, until I have finally decided to break down and get one myself. If aint about 'the pretty colors' as you put it, it is about PROGRESS.

    The kind of progress that we wanted when we went from Win 3.11 to Win 95. The kind of progress we expected when we went from Visual Basic to C#. Or better put, the kind of PROGRESS that we USED to get from Microsoft. Disclaimer: Yeah, I used to work for Microsoft, so fucking what?

    The point is; progress seems to be coming slower and slower, in the exact ways that Lucovski pointed out when he left the company. Personally, I am getting sick of hearing about shit, only to later hear that the one thing that would make me spend money beyond MSDN has just gotten ripped out.

    Many of us who make our living on Windows and other Microsoft products would like something more to talk about than just .NET. Unless you have had your wife laugh at you as you search for device drivers while she just FUCKING WORKS, knows exactly what I am talking about.

    In short, we are fucking fed up.

    You are right, it aint about 'pretty colors', it is about showing us that the company can still produce something BETTER than what we had before. If they cant do it in the GUI, why the fuck should we believe that they can do it in the file system?

    First impressions are a bitch, and these aint good ones. We've been looking at the same shit for two years now, and I dont see any progress anywhere, just ugly screens of boring shit.

    Apple's shit may not be all that much better, but they at the very least manage to put a nice ribbon on it, and act like the shit is special enough to want it.

    XP works; Win2K3 works damn well. But, if you are trying to show me something new, the very least you can do is take the time to make sure it aint similar to what we have already seen or at the very least not fucking ugly?

    1. Re:You are missing the point, dude. by swillden · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The kind of progress that we wanted when we went from Win 3.11 to Win 95. The kind of progress we expected when we went from Visual Basic to C#. Or better put, the kind of PROGRESS that we USED to get from Microsoft.

      I don't think we EVER got significant progress FROM Microsoft. They have always slowed us down.

      To put this in perspective, I remember a conversation I had with a Microsoft fan in 1993. Windows 3.11 for Workgroups was just released and "Chicago" (Windows 95, though it was originally expected in early '94 IIRC) was being hyped as the next big thing. This fan was a developer, thoroughly steeped in the Microsoft world. He was actually training me to take his job, since he had just left the company I was just hired into.

      While he raved about the great advances coming in Chicago and what a great job Microsoft was doing at "pushing technology forward" (his words), I was thinking about the NeXTstation I had on the kitchen table at home. A 32-bit multi-user OS on top of a state-of-the-art microkernel that ran fine in isolation but really shone on a network; a beautiful, elegant user interface that was guaranteed to print exactly as it displayed; a development toolset that was better than anything I've ever used since (there probably are better, now, but only in the last few years, and I haven't used them); a serious audio machine with high-quality stereo sound; and a box that came with a free suite of apps that would have cost thousands for Windows (and were far inferior on Windows).

      And that NeXT machine was almost two years old. Next to it, Windows 3.11 looked like an ugly, broken, limited toy.

      But you said "progress" not "innovation", didn't you? You were talking about how much MS stuff improved from version to version, not about how it compared to the rest of the market.

      I think good clue as to the slowdown in this sort of progress also comes from that 1993 conversation, when we discussed the disk compression that MS had added to DOS 6.0, forcing Stac Electronics aside (and ultimately out of business). I think that story is pretty typical of how most MS progress was made... by hurriedly copying ideas that had been implemented elsewhere.

      The problem now is that there is no elsewhere to copy from! Microsoft has so completely crushed everyone else that the flow of new ideas has slowed to a trickle. Microsoft has also been held up by trying to patch over a lot of bad security decisions made in the past, but I don't think that's the whole story. MS has built an empire on allowing others to develop and prove good ideas, and then cherry-picking the best. Now, as the dominant force, MS has to make the transition to becoming innovative on their own dime, and they're not very good at it. Not yet, anyway. Given the large number of very smart people they have, and the cash they have to play with, they'll get there, I'm sure. But they not only have to get there, they have to get good enough to compete with open source. They have to compete with "adequate-but-free" and try to beat it with "amazingly-good-but-for-a price".

      I wish them well. But I sold my MS stock.

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
  31. Is your job... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    "The features I work on, and most of the features I've seen in other group's demos, were not merged into this build."

    Is your job to add the suck before or after core API's? I assume there are people responsible for both.

    1. Re:Is your job... by dioscaido · · Score: 4, Funny

      I try to sprinkle the suck generously. Sometimes my stuff can't help but be useful, and that's when I sit down and put some serious thought as to whether I'm working on the right project.

  32. Re:Censored or Mindfucked? What's better? by kubrick · · Score: 4, Funny

    He'd probably claim that they were an integrated part of Windows and couldn't be shipped separately.

    --
    deus does not exist but if he does
  33. Not so much "gone" as "still there." by chefmonkey · · Score: 4, Informative

    Or, more accurately, simply commented out of the HTML.

    Shot 1
    Shot 2
    Shot 3
    Shot 4
    Shot 5
    Shot 6
    Shot 7
    Shot 8
    Shot 9
    Shot 10
    Shot 11
    Shot 12

    And here is some random text to attempt to satisfy Slashdot's inane content filters. Apparently, it has to be quite a bit of text. I don't know what the average line length is that it requires, but it looks like it's unreasonably high.