Kevin Smith Previews Revenge of the Sith
Eugenia writes "Kevin Smith, the well-known actor/director, was invited by George Lucas to a special advanced screening of the upcoming 'Star Wars: Revenge of the Sith' film and he wrote down his take on the movie. There are some serious spoilers in his article but it's interesting to see his reaction, as a director and Star Wars fan."
Didn't we see this astroturfing "reviews" when the latest episode came out? It was supposed to the best episode ever and when I went to see it, it was fucking crap aimed at 13-year old.
"Revenge of the Sith" is, quite simply, fucking awesome." Is the first line of the review really that hard to read?
I get the gist that kevin loved ROTS...
Isn't he slated in a production role for the upcoming TV series?
I would take the review with a few grains...
Sometimes I wish I hadn't read every spoiler on millenniumfalcon.com. I know way more about this one going in than any of the previous prequels, but I'm still excited.
Personally, I think most of the hate directed at the previous two, Jar-Jar comments aside, was a media invention. Things get repeated enough and people start to believe it. I'm sure the same thing will happen this time around to some degree, but this is seriously the movie that fans have been waiting for. The previous two were sort of procedural. Sure, it's great to see where Anakin comes from, but admit it -- what you really want is to see him kill children.
Slashdot: 24 hours behind every other site or your money back!
I like the guy, but everyone knows he's a raving Star Wars fan-boy.
Plus, Episode I and II were so bad, if this is even halfway-decent, it's going to seem like a fucking masterpiece.
I'm still expecting it to suck. I don't see how it can't.
True in general, but in this case, it's because those films kind of stank.
I'll list a few specifics
I'm sorry, the Geoge Lucas of the 70's knew about pacing. Episodes IV, V, and VI were very fast and snappy. Episodes I and II just dragged terribly. I'm hoping that III picks up the pace a bit.
Craig Steffen
http://www.craigsteffen.net
Let's see, what do we know from 4-6. Darth Vader is Luke's father, and Leia is his sister. Obi Wan took Luke to Tatooine to live with Uncle Owen after Darth Vader took out the Jedi. The Emperor is bad, and he's the one who turns Anakin into Darth Vader via the Dark Side.
So that means in Episode 3, that there's going to be a pair of twins born, Obi Wan's going to take one of them to Tatooine, lots of Jedi will be killed, and Anakin's going to be put back together to become Darth Vader by the Emperor.
And that pretty much sums up exactly what the review says. Basically, it would appear to completely connect what has happened in 1 and 2 with 4-6. The review does point out a couple of plot elements to show just how dark Ep3 is going to be, and how much he liked it, but I don't think they'd ruin it for anyone.
Nor were most reviews of Episodes I & II...
I get the feeling the review was more directed at the existing fans that were disappointed by those 2 movies, saying they probably won't be disappointed this time.
Dark Nexus
"Sanity is calming, but madness is more interesting."
Personally, I think most of the hate directed at the previous two, Jar-Jar comments aside, was a media invention.
Absolutely right, it is a media invention, invented by none other than Lucas when he created the two abominations that are Star Wars Episodes I and II.
I own the Ep I DVD (stupid me for buying the thing sight-unseen despite the negative comments here and elsewhere). I was spared spending money on the second one by watching the first half hour or so on a friend's box (that person had downloaded it about a week before SW came out in theaters). It was so bad, that by the time we got to the wooden Natilie Portman talks to Annikan scene we quit watching and deleted the file.
Last night, after watching SW Revelations, I tried watching Episode I again just for the FX eye candy. Again, the writing, acting, and storyline were so bad, I couldn't finish it. I'd forgotten how truly awful it is.
I liked Star Wars--but not anymore. This isn't some "Liberal Media Conspiracy" any more than the exposure of Tom Delay's congressional corruption is. The hatred for the new Star Wars movies (Jar Jar included) is derived solely from the absolute feces George Lucas has chosen to foist upon his fans in place of an actual Star Wars movie. It's a shame so many fans are willing to accept such drivel, for that lowers the bar on any future SW creations (and truth be told, even at its best the bar was never THAT high to begin with)...which means we can only expect the same or worse. Fan Fiction films like Revelations excepted--that was truly remarkable: a low budget film with a better storyline, better acting, and better execution than the last two Lucas movies (FX excepted, and even there they did an excellent job).
The Future of Human Evolution: Autonomy
The truth of the matter is this:
We're all going to go see the damn movie! Some of us will go because we like Star Wars, no matter what the plot (or lack thereof); we like shit blowing up and sword fights. And FX. Lot's of 'em. Some of us will go to see if the movie is good. Others to see if the movie sucks.
Either way, we're all seeing the movie and Lucas hears the bells of cash registers ringing in his head.
I remain skeptical. I was around when Star Wars first came out, a long time ago. The critics ripped it up one side down the other, on plot; they _did_ love the effects. Given Episodes IV, VI, I and II, does anyone really think Lucas has profoundly changed?
Smith sounds like he's channeling George Peppard: "I love it when a plan comes together!" He's thrilled about the tie-ins to Episode IV ("ooh, that's so cool how they used the same corridor!") and the darkness. Darkness as a good thing is the sign of someone who was _seriously_ damaged by Jar-Jar.
Slashdot: Failed Car Analogies. Amateur Lawyering. Anecdote Battles.
Ok, 2 things WRT to Jay and Silent Bob Strike Back :
1) It's a movie, not real life. Anyone that can't appreciate Jay pausing to take a hit from his double-ended blunt-saber while battling Mark "Luke" Hammill needs to have that pin removed from their ass-crack with a bulldozer.
2) Even if you're not that uptight and still didn't like the movie, I'd suggest you try starting from the ground up. Clerks, MallRats, Chasing Amy, Dogma and then finally go back and re-watch Jay and Silent Bob Strike Back
...or he's engaged in a balls-to-the-wall lightsaber duel in the Senate with Yoda, his "Little, green friend" (his words, not mine - which I kinda dug, because, interestingly, I think it's the first time anyone's acknowledged that Yoda is green in any of the "Star Wars" flicks)...
Love his work or hate it, the man is unquestionably a true geek.
He never says that he doesn't remember them, he says something to the effect of "I don't remember ever owning any droids." And that is technically true, as he never owned them (or any others as far as the films show).
I was initially bothered by this as well, but I've decided it was just Ben being coy about what was happening. After all, last he had heard (being on the furthest point from the bright center of the universe) the Jedi Knights were being hunted down and killed. Couldn't be possible that he might have some reservations about whether or not Luke was being used (without him knowing it) to track him down?
As for the home-testing kit, I suspect those were made under the auspices of the Jedi Council, and with the destruction of the Jedi, they weren't available anymore.
Whew . . . that's enough geek for today!
Kevin Smith liked it. He said he really liked it. [...] But let me reiterate. Kevin Smith is raving and drooling about this movie. My hopes have been suitably elevated.
So Kevin Smith, known fanboy, and in line to get the TV series writing job from Lucas, reviewed it and liked it? Well, I'm satisfied.
I'm sure if it sucked he would have objectively told us so, without fear of reprisal from his dark master!
You can't take the sky from me...
I think Lucas really did aim it at said 13-year-olds. The Episodes were childish and mediocre, yes, but now that those 13-year-olds have seen Ep. I (at 10) and Ep. II (at, of course, 13) they are now about 16 and are a bit ready to see what finally happens to the little blond kid just before he went all James Earl Jones on us.
I think Ep. III will profit from a nice convergence of the older fans (of the originals) with the younger guys who haven't seen Eps. IV-VI.
That is why (IMO) Lucas put in Jar Jar and started from Anakin's little-boy days. Not to appease the adults who wanted to know about Vader's past, but to attract new, much younger fans. Now that he's attracted an extra demographic and they have grown, he can tell all of us about the Anakin->Vader metamorphosis. He didn't aim Episode I or even II at you or anyone remotely similar. He wanted an extra fanbase/profit source. This time, I think, us older fans shall be pleased, since we have lower expectations from I and II. He'd better; it's his last decent chance to. That's what I see.
You can hold down the "B" button for continuous firing.
Why do I have this reversed? Old timer geeks just call Episode 4 "Star Wars".
the jaw-dropping Anakin/Obi Wan fight on Mustafar (where - after cutting his legs and arm off, Ben leaves Skywalker
Did he mention anything about it being merely a flesh wound?
It can't with the milk solids as part of it. Clarified butter is made for this purpose. It contains only the fats and none of the water or milk solids. This is often used in pan frying for flavor and CAN stay at the temperatures required. The reason it isn't used is cost. And the fact that the movie going public doesn't care about quality.
But the spoiler is explaining HOW (and WHY) those events you described happens! We know WHAT happens and now we will see a lot of the HOW and WHY in ROTS. And Kevin reveals a lot about the HOW (like command 66 or something) and WHY: in my book, that's a spoiler!
Oh... My.... Gawd.
That has GOT, without a doubt to be the stupidest thing I have ever read in my entire life, and I feel my IQ temporarily dropped 10 points for having read your comment.
Did any of that ramble make any sense?
You are complaining because he linked 3 with 4? thats what THIS FUCKING MOVIE IS SUPPOSE TO DO YOU MORONIC RETARD.
Why did anakin kill the kids? BECAUSE THEY WERE FREAKING JEDI. why was he personally responsible? HE'S THE VILLAN. and probably the only one with the force at the moment, devinately the only one who could have gotten into the council, (storm troupers couldn't have at that point.)
Please don't watch the movie. Just let it go. I agree the first two were not the greatest movies in the world, but for all the horseshit you are spreading around you would think they were gigli or something. and my kids like them, aged 11 and 12, right at the age when those movies should appeal to them.
Get over yourself.
Just three more hours seapeople and you can finally take me away from this crappy God Damned planet full of hippies
But it doesn't.
Ben (Annie's old MENTOR) rescues Annie's SON who is accompanied by the droid that Annie BUILT and another droid from Ben's past when he fought and almost KILLED Annie.
And the only reaction Ben shows is
No interest in HOW that particular droid got there.
No concern that a droid built by a planet destroying maniac with a personal grudge against him just showed up on his doorstep.
Seeing the kid isn't something new. Ben knew that Luke was there and why.
Seeing C3PO AND R2D2 show up SHOULD have caused a reaction.
EVERY
JEDI
KILLED (except 2)
Yet no reaction. None at all.
Here, let me give you a movie scenario and you can fill in the emotion.
Back in our hero's past, he had fought against the bad guy and the bad guy had killed all of our hero's family. Our hero knows the car the bad guy drives. Our hero rescued the bad guy's kid and hid him away in another city.
Then, one day, the kid shows up at our hero's apartment in the city. Our hero looks outside and sees
Our hero says
==========
Right. The ENTIRE dialogue sequence is wrong in ep#4 when you've seen ep #1-3.
That's just like the old "parsec" non-explanation.
Even Star Wars itself was revised several times during the storyboard phase.
And this is a bad thing why? Are you saying that once something reaches the storyboard phase that the storyline must be set in stone at that point?
What if somebody has A Great Idea that changes something for the better while shooting a scene? According to your logic, the director's obligated to say, "Sorry, but the storyboard says it's gotta be like this. Your suggestion would make it 100% better, but the storyboard..."
*harumph*
In walking, just walk. In sitting, just sit. Above all, don't wobble.
-- Yun-Men