Slashdot Mirror


The Art and Design of Quake 4

Gamespy has a feature discussing the upcoming first person shooter Quake 4. More details about the title are revealed in an interview and screenshots provided by some of the folks at Raven. From the article: "I think we have a lot of diversity throughout the entire game. We have some dark areas, and we have outdoor areas that are brighter. I think how diverse everything is will really go a long way. We didn't really set out saying, 'This game is going to be dark, this game is going to be light' -- we set out to make a cohesive environment where you go through different extremes and you'll see a bunch of different stuff."

16 of 335 comments (clear)

  1. One of my pals... by PsychicX · · Score: 5, Interesting

    One of my good (internet) friends is a programmer on Quake 4, and I know a few other guys on the Activision tech team and such. The story is a continuation of Quake 2, but you can expect Q3A style multiplayer awesomeness as well. It's going to be a great game.

  2. Can't wait by Sv-Manowar · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I think this game will be great, and the people saying it might be like doom3 are part of the problem with doom3. Doom3 wasn't bad, it was just overhyped as the game of the millenium

    Hopefully this game won't be expected to entertain you, run your life, cook your meals and generally rule the universe like Doom3 was

  3. Aquaphobia for Quake 2 by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I'm hoping to have my massive 32/64-player Quake 2 DM level, Aquaphobia, done before Quake 4 comes out. I only been working on it (on-and-off-but-mostly-off) for the last six years.

    Aquaphobia Project Page

    After I get done with Quake 4 single player, I'll start working on some new levels for that game.

  4. let's hope it's better than Doom 3 by dioscaido · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Doom 3 was a poor game. It amounts to hours and hours of running down cramped hallways, encountering monsters that other than visually don't really differ much. It gets really boring really quick.

    The game feels more like one long technology demo, than something built to provide compelling entertainment. And even being a technology demo, the results are less than impressive. The vast, lush environments in HL2 make the cramped environments in Doom 3 look quaint in comparison, even if the Doom 3 engine, with its real time lighting, is ultimately more advanced. I wonder if Doom 3 can even handle environments that have the same scope as HL2. The portions of Doom 3 that take place on the outside of Mars look really bad. Hell ends up being a bit more impressive, but it quickly reverts back to the familiar small enclosed envirnoment.

    Hopefully the Quake 4 team will be able to make a more compelling game.

    1. Re:let's hope it's better than Doom 3 by m50d · · Score: 3, Interesting

      It *is* a technology demo. Id makes much more by licensing the engine than selling the games, so the main point of the game is to show off the engine.

      --
      I am trolling
  5. The Heart? by bleckywelcky · · Score: 2, Interesting


    The Heart - blatently stolen from Natural Selection's hive.

  6. Re:Cooperative mode needed! by ShieldW0lf · · Score: 5, Interesting

    If you want good co-op games you can play with your wife, you can't go wrong with Bioware. The Baldurs Gate series in particular is great for playing with chicks... the ability to pause the game at any time is great for those who don't have the highly developed fast-twitch mousing ability :P

    --
    -1 Uncomfortable Truth
  7. Re:Cooperative mode needed! by Janitha · · Score: 4, Interesting

    You might want to check in with Serious sam, just a funny game with a ridiculously insane (in a good way) engine. Wonder why that engine never kicked off...?

  8. Re:I always thought by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I liked Q1 most, myself. The weapons were nice, the patterns for killing enemies without receiving damage were pleasant, the physics had a nice "feeling," and the gothic setting felt much less like a bad SciFi movie. Playing it co-op was fun, too.

    I never much liked the artwork for Q2, nor the weapons for the most part. The change in the game physics was also sort of disappointing.

    If Q4 is all SciFi-ish like Q2, I'll only really be into it if it has had zero art contribution from id. Raven has good artists, but id has shown in Q2, Q3, and Doom 3 that it has a penchant for tacky models. Really pretty maps, with really, really bad models filling them.

  9. Re:Cooperative mode needed! by 88NoSoup4U88 · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Aww, I almost forgot about Serious Sam.

    So true that it's strange that engine didn't take off : It wasn't too advanced, but with it, also came a lower licensing price.

    The one thing that rocked was the ammount of enemies at the same time on-screen.
    Heh, I'm getting flashbacks of millions of screaming headless-madmen running at me in a closed-off valley :)

  10. Re:I always thought by Greyfox · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Quake I with the Team Fortress or Navy Seals mods was really great. The Navy Seals mod had the best weapon feel of any FPS I've ever played. I liked the plain Quake I weapons a lot more than the Quake II ones as well. Especially the grenade launcher -- that one's always been my favorite :-)

    --

    I'm trying to teach myself to set people on fire with my mind... Is it hot in here?

  11. Outdoor Lighting by tony1c · · Score: 2, Interesting

    This is using the Doom 3 engine, correct? One of the problems with that engine is that it didn't support (or didn't use) any kind of indirect lighting (radiosity, etc.) in order to calculate all the lighting dynamically. That just doesn't work well in outdoor environments. Is Q4 going to support some kind of indirect lighting for those outdoor areas? A static/dynamic hybrid might be interesting -- precalculated radiosity with real-time dynamic lighting "layered" on top.

  12. Re:erm by Prof.Phreak · · Score: 3, Interesting

    It's kind of weird, but -lots- of what the doom3 engine -can- do wasn't in the game. If you look through the SDK, there's plenty of stuff that seemingly didn't make it into the game (like support for vihicles, etc.) They could've made it FPS for part of the game, then have the player ride a tank like in UT2004, then fly around, etc. Dunno why they didn't do it.

    Oh, and the engine can support huge open maps (just like Team Arena terrain maps).

    --

    "If anything can go wrong, it will." - Murphy

  13. Re:I think id should break the mold this time by ultramarweeni · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Quaker IV?

  14. Most architecture... by MMaestro · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Is either overly simple and designed for pure function or overly fashionable.

    Look at the interior of most modern museums. For the most part their big rectangle rooms with chairs in the center with paintings on the wall. Sure its great when you have 500 different tourists trying to cram into a room designed for 300 people, but its god awful ugly for video games.

    Same thing with modern day airports. Why build restaurants, newspaper stands or bookstores into the design? Isn't the goal supposed to be streamlining the process of getting people to and from their airplanes? That sure as hell doesn't happen with all those distractions. A couple vending machines and advertising reminders over time can replace this old design.

    Modern day architecture is EXTREMELY overly glamorous. Take a look at medieval castles: tight hallways means easy to defend, towers on the corners means maximum line of sight in 360 degrees, a wall where troops can stand on to defend against attacks either inside or outside the castle. Ugly as hell but it gets the job done with minimal waste of material.

  15. Re:Cooperative mode needed! by malkavian · · Score: 2, Interesting

    All I can say is Guild Wars.
    The girlfriend enjoys the game as much as I do.
    Can be played single player (with henchmen to bulk out a party) or co-op.
    A great solution to Co-Op games. Have a peer, if you haven't already.