Slashdot Mirror


Gates Releases Details on New Mobile OS

rjelks writes "Microsoft's Bill Gates released details about the company's new mobile operating system, code-named Magneto, at the Mobile & Embedded Developers Conference in Las Vegas today. There has been a lot of recent speculation about the new OS. People have been describing it as a possible 'Blackberry killer.' Windows Mobile 2005 will be released to hardware manufacturers immediately. The OS will integrate Smartphone, Pocket PC, and Pocket PC Phone Edition operating systems into one platform. It will also include updates to the mobile versions of Word, Excel and PowerPoint." Relatedly, ZDNet has an interview with Gates about the initiative.

65 of 265 comments (clear)

  1. Magneto? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    We'd better call the X(org)-Men!

    1. Re:Magneto? by justforaday · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Microsoft: The new Apple wannabe?

      New? Where have you been for the past 20 odd years?

      --
      I'll turn into a supernova and burn up everything. Well I'll turn into a black little hole and you'll turn into string.
    2. Re:Magneto? by FidelCatsro · · Score: 2, Funny

      To paraphrase Full metal jacket..

      There are only two types of OS names from microsoft!

      Steers and XPers.

      Which are you son?

      --
      The only things certain in war are Propaganda and Death. You can never be sure which is which though
  2. Blackberry killer... by Thud457 · · Score: 5, Funny

    as in "man, this Magneto OS is really killing my Blackberry, It takes 128 MB RAM and a 1gHz processor".

    --

    the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

  3. Magneto by Rei · · Score: 5, Funny

    ... so-called because it has a nasty tendancy to wipe your hard drive every so often. I still wish Microsoft would go back to the naming scheme used with WinCE - naming their operating systems after their users' first reactions.

    --
    I'm you from the future! We have to finish our time machine before the Angels of Destruction find the portal!
    1. Re:Magneto by Metteyya · · Score: 5, Funny

      If they'd really used this naming scheme, most Windows version should be named WinWTF.

    2. Re:magneto by Beardo+the+Bearded · · Score: 2, Funny

      The phone does everything you want it to already!

      A phone manipulates the magnetic fields around you. That's how it works.

      If the car's in your way on the freeway, just hold the phone up to your ear, weave around in traffic, and speed up. They'll move.

      If you can't reach the remote, I'm sure that there's a hack to use the phone as a remote. If there isn't one yet, there will be soon enough.

      As for mutants, it's pre-emptive. For proof, I say you don't see any metal-skeletoned mutants around here, do you?

      --

      ---
      ECHELON is a government program to find words like bomb, jihad, plutonium, assassinate, and anarchy.
  4. Blackberry killer by hotdiggitydawg · · Score: 2, Funny

    People have been describing it as a possible 'Blackberry killer.'

    10 bucks says it turns out to be more useful in the weed-killing sense...

    1. Re:Blackberry Killer by Locke2005 · · Score: 2, Funny

      You mean, I should stop referring to Linux as "the Windows killer"?!?

      --
      I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
    2. Re:Blackberry Killer by Tim+C · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yes, you should. Linux isn't going to kill Windows any time soon, if ever. It's too deeply entrenched and too many people and companies have too much invested in it.

    3. Re:Blackberry Killer by DunbarTheInept · · Score: 2, Funny

      ... or are you just happy to see me?

      --

      Don't label something "offtopic" unless you know the topic well enough to tell what's on topic.

    4. Re:Blackberry Killer by MojoStan · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Whenever something is described as an XKiller, it never kills product X and such claims are usually FUD or just hype.

      Voodoo Killer? 3Dfx's Voodoo cards were the first products I can remember being targeted for "killing." Graphics history buffs know Voodoo got eaten by NVIDIA.

      Unless the market leader makes it very difficult and/or inconvenient to switch, they can get killed. What makes the Blackberry so un-killable?

      --
      TO START
      PRESS ANY KEY

      Where's the 'ANY' key? I see Esk, Kitarl, and Pig-Up...

  5. Screen Shots of Windows Mobile 5 by davidconger · · Score: 4, Informative

    For more about some of the new features and to see screenshots from Windows Mobile 5 (including ActiveSync 4.0, PowerPoint Mobile, Smartphone User Interface, One-Handed Interface for Pocket PC, Internet Explorer Mobile, Excel Mobile, Word Mobile, and Pocket MSN Client) here: http://www.davespda.com/special/wm5/ There is also improved WMP 10 Mobile DRM support, new photo and video API's for developers, 3G and UMTS support, and more.

    1. Re:Screen Shots of Windows Mobile 5 by LiquidCoooled · · Score: 3, Funny

      One-Handed Interface for Pocket PC

      I'm sure many slashdot readers would like this feature for their desktop machine.

      --
      liqbase :: faster than paper
    2. Re:Screen Shots of Windows Mobile 5 by anakin357 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I've used a Windows Mobile Smartphone for the past year. Am I concerned about getting spyware on my phone? Not in the least.

      I'll tell you why.

      First off, any program you try to install must be confirmed that you want the application. You (or your carrier) can also set the phone up so it will only accept signed applications, which I beleive means Microsoft approved it for use with the OS.

      Do you worry about getting spyware on an XBox too? Every game that is put out for the XBox is signed by Microsoft as being legit. It's the same deal on MS Smartphone.

      About your comment on Pocket Internet Explorer, Web browsing (no matter what browser you are using) over GPRS (celluar data) is slow. Think around 14.4, dialup speeds. My phone has a 200MHz processor and 32MB of RAM, so that influences how fast pages load, etc.

      So any pages I visit, I goto them for a reason, because I want to view that page, and something important is there. For example while at work I can check on the status of a package on FedEx.com and see if I should go home for lunch and put the package inside the house instead of letting it stay outside for 8 hours.

      I personally do not go browsing or searching for things on my phone that I do not implicitly trust.

      On the otherhand, on my PC with fast internet, I could get a emailed link, get a link sent by a friend saying "hey this is cool"... my PC is so fast compared to a phone that you can click a link, and within seconds your machine is infected.

      The problem is user authentication and proper policy management. For people who use their PC at home, this is a "nuisance" because many people would be using the PC, many people would want to install applications, and for a computer to ask for the master password whenever a program is installed is really just a out there idea. Most people want to be able to install whatever they want, whenever they want and not have to authenticate themselves.

      Mac OS X can be set to authenticate when you install programs, there's no spyware for Macs. Linux authenticates before you start your user session, there's no spyware for Linux.

      Windows for PC is meant to be stupid user friendly. That's what makes it a target for spyware. I talk to people almost daily who have gotten a major infection of spyware on their PC and that's because their 12 year old son installed Kazaa, or downloaded some free smiles, or wanted to check the weather. If there was user authentication on the PC when installing programs, it might be less of a target, because only an authorized user can install things.

      That said, I do install unsigned applications on my phone. But at least I know what I am installing and when.

      Why don't you shut up if you don't have an informed opinion, and I would ask you to call me as know as soon as there's a virus out there that bypasses user authentication and can install it onto my cellphone, but I'll be reading it via RSS -- on my phone.

      --
      http://www.fsckin.com/
  6. PUSH by whackco · · Score: 4, Insightful

    When they have effective PUSH EMail built into Exchange 2k3 in SP2 it WILL kill blackberry. I for one HATE the BB Ent Srv.

    That said....flame away

    1. Re:PUSH by Locke2005 · · Score: 2

      Yeah, push email will be just great when somebody mail-bombs you with more email than you have memory in your PDA to store...

      --
      I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
    2. Re:PUSH by apnar · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It already exisits and works well. If you use a recent windows mobile phone or PDA with Exchange 2k3 SP2 you can set it up. The way it works is the exchange server will send your mobile an SMS when it gets a new message. This SMS is eaten by your phone and you never see it, it does trigger active sync in your phone though which then downloads the new messasge. Works well. You can read up on it here:

      http://www.microsoft.com/technet/community/chats/t rans/exchange/exc0428.mspx

  7. Combining everything huh? by IWantMoreSpamPlease · · Score: 2, Funny

    A wise move, consolidate all your security holes, viruses, worms, BSODs and spyware all under one OS umbrella!

    Smart MS, very very smart.

    --
    So rise up, all ye lost ones, as one, we'll claw the clouds.
  8. Blackberry Killer by kevin_conaway · · Score: 4, Insightful

    OK, I think its safe to disregard this product and the person calling it that. Whenever something is described as an XKiller, it never kills product X and such claims are usually FUD or just hype.

  9. More on Magneto: by mr_don't · · Score: 5, Funny

    More information on Magneto:

    Years later Magnus reemerged as Magneto, who was determined to conquer the human race to prevent their oppression of mutants. Xavier's original team of X-Men thwarted his first public move in his war with humanity, the takeover of the Cape Citadel missile base. When they next clashed, Magneto was leading his original Brotherhood of Evil Mutants, which included Wanda and Pietro, now known as the Scarlet Witch and Quicksilver.

    Not until years later would Magneto learn that they were actually his children. At one point Magneto genetically engineered a being called Alpha the Ultimate Mutant, who rebelled against him and turned Magneto back into an infant. Magneto thereafter had a series of battles with Xavier's new team of X-Men.

    1. Re:More on Magneto: by Mikito · · Score: 2, Funny

      The grandparent post is simultaneously funny and informative.

      Other computer software companies would do well to follow Microsoft's lead and use naming schemes based on mythology (Cyclops, Phoenix), natural phenomena (Storm, Sunspot not an X-man last time I checked, many years ago ) and as someone else said, animals.

      Microsoft could have picked some really off the wall names from comic books...Galactus or the Silver Surfer.

      Oh, here's one that would strike a chord on /. :

      Penguin.

      --
      Anakin Simpson: If you're not with me, then you're my enemy--ooh, donuts!
  10. Quick, Dial 911!!!! by dfn5 · · Score: 4, Funny
    OK, just as soon as my phone is done rebooting.

    --
    -- Thou hast strayed far from the path of the Avatar.
    1. Re:Quick, Dial 911!!!! by brasten · · Score: 2, Interesting

      You joke, but you'd be surprised how often I have to reboot my Symbian phone to get things working properly again.

    2. Re:Quick, Dial 911!!!! by Swamii · · Score: 2, Funny

      Quick, Dial 911!!!!
      OK, just as soon as my phone is done rebooting.


      How horribly ironic it would be if the man in need of an ambulance died while you were rebooting after a blue screen of death.

      --
      Tech, life, family, faith: Give me a visit
  11. Finally the proof : MS IS evil by TekGoNos · · Score: 4, Funny

    Why else would they name their new OS after a super-villain?

    --
    I have discovered a truly remarkable proof for my post which this sig is too small to contain.
  12. Ah, by uberjoe · · Score: 3, Funny

    But will it speak to me in the voice of Ian McKellen?

    --

    The days of the digital watch are numbered.

  13. Magneto? by neuro.slug · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Is it just me, or is Microsoft attempting to re-invent their image? "Magneto", like "Underdog" (the new search engine) is definitely a far cry from "Longhorn" in terms of target audience.

    Microsoft: The new Apple wannabe? I dunno.

    -- n

  14. OS's code-named after supervillians... by Bonker · · Score: 5, Funny

    Yeah, that's a good PR move.

    What happened to MS naming their releases after cities?

    Next OS is going to be 'Red Skull', but with none of the anti-semitism that so many would like to accuse MS of.

    After that, look forward to 'Kingpin' OS, with plenty of features to make sure that Microsoft stays at the top of the heap, wink, wink, nudge, nudge.

    The 'Juggernaut' OS will mark MS's return to using the X-Men's enemies as code names, but will also describe the install footprint.

    'Apocalypse' OS will be release immediately after Billy G. has been declared world dictator for life, forever and ever amen.

    --
    The next Slashdot story will be ready soon, but subscribers can beat the rush and slashdot the links early!
    1. Re:OS's code-named after supervillians... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      And while we're at it, OS "Maureen O'Gara"

  15. Possible? by Tenebrious1 · · Score: 2, Funny

    People have been describing it as a possible 'Blackberry killer.'

    I think that was part of the original script that got cut from the movie; just as Arthur is losing his arms and Ford is turning into a penguin, Microsoft releases a "Blackberry Killer" OS. On the other hand, the Microsoft "iPod killer" was determined to be of such high improbability that it would have occurred before they were rescued from certain death.

    --
    -- If god wanted me to have a sig, he'd have given me a sense of humor.
  16. My bet by c0ldfusi0n · · Score: 3, Funny

    I have $50 on Wheels for that new mobile OS' name.

    ...think about it..

    ...a little bit more..

    There you go!

    --
    A computer makes it possible to do, in half an hour, tasks which were completely unnecessary to do before.
  17. Looking good... by Cmdr+Whackjob · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I'm looking to replace the current line of PDA's for our company and this sounds very interesting. Employees are often out of office and an all-in-one device like this will be great for them to keep in touch - and maybe even do a bit of work on.

  18. Well by Sv-Manowar · · Score: 4, Interesting

    It's good to see that they are targetting the Blackberry domination of the market, hopefully it will lead to manufacturers battling to achieve market share, which would mean better products for us, the consumer.

    I just wouldn't want to be beta testing that ;)

  19. Re:Microsoft by Stibidor · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Ever heard of multiple streams of income? What does it matter to them if any of their OSes work perfectly, so long as people are buying them?

  20. Re:Let me... by mattdev121 · · Score: 2, Informative
    --
    mattdev@server$ touch /dev/genitals
    cannot touch `/dev/genitals': Permission denied
  21. Xavier by bitswapper · · Score: 4, Funny


    Namewars - So now Blackberry needs to come out with Xavier.

  22. Why SmartPhone is crap by hirschma · · Score: 5, Informative

    I have one, won it in a contest, an Orange SPV-C500.

    They're going to have to make a whole lot of changes to make this dog hunt. Problems with the current SmartPhone:

    * Sync: you can sync with (just) one device. Don't ever try to unsync with that device, tho - in my case, you just can't. My notebook and phone are bonded forever.

    * Interface: One more time: the Windows Start button metaphor doesn't work on small devices. Other issues include that it can take several steps to get to common programs.

    * Non-intuitive/inconsistent UI: Sometimes, you can cancel out of something with the "red phone" button like on other phones. Sometimes you have to back out of things with the cursor button. Users of pretty much any other phone UI will go crazy.

    * Not invented here syndrome: MMS uses AMR encoding for audio. Smartphone (at least my version) just doesn't support it, period.

    * Crashes: It crashes a lot more than other phone OSes I've tried. Sometimes the crashes are partial - like losing networking ability.

    * LONG boot time: takes over a minute for my phone to come up.

    * Difficult to configure: the interface for configuring email and other internet apps is horrid and slow. Can't do it from a desktop app.

    * Web browser is just totally wonky: some things load. Some things don't. What loaded yesterday doesn't work today.

    * Slow: I believe that my device as a 200mhz processor in it, but screen updates and nav is really, really slow.

    * You get charged for everything: there is seemingly no community, but just software vendors. Folks that are spoiled by all the nice gadgety apps available on Palm and Symbian are going to be disappointed.

    Give me a Treo or Symbian device any day. I only use the thing because it was free, and I'm thinking seriously about ebaying it anyway.

    Microsoft has a lot of work here before they kill anything. I'm hating this thing so much that I'm about ready to go back to my "dumb" phone and PDA combo that I used before.

    jh

    1. Re:Why SmartPhone is crap by Zone-MR · · Score: 2, Informative

      However, I have moaned publicly about the lack of community in the OS in terms of software development. Some of the user groups, such as this one [modaco.com] do have a great and helpful community, it's just that the creators of the free apps don't embrace OSS at all. :-(

      Shameless plug: www.spv-developers.com

      Still small, but growing rapidly. We've worked on several interesting OSS projects, and have some revolutionary new stuff planned for the coming weeks :p

  23. Why spend hundreds of dollars on a phone? by mcho · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Personally, I don't think an all-in-one phone is practical.

    Computers are overly complex as it, why make phones the same way? For example, a friend of mine asked me to help him export/import his contact list from Outlook. He couldn't figure it out even though this is a feature that's been around for a good, long time, but probably a majority of users don't know how to use it.

    That's why I've started messagingreminder.com so you can automatically recieve reminders on your appointments (which are stored in Microsoft Outlook or Mozilla Sunbird) -- you don't have to do anything but run the software!

    I rather have a $50 with a good battery life and reception than a +$300 phone that I can't figure out how to use and quickly drains its battery.

  24. It'll take Hardware by At0miC · · Score: 3, Insightful

    It will take new Hardware to 'kill' blackberry not the software running it. The blackberry is popular because it's compact and does it's job.
    If/When microsoft can pressure hardware makers into creating something that has form and fucntion, then all the bells and whistles of a new OS will help push them over the top. Until then, the blackberry will continue to own the business communications market...

  25. Are the apps still going to be crippled versions? by argent · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The "Palm-Sized PC" and then Pocket PC apps were crippled version of the original Windows CE applications, with the ability to view multiple documents and navigate the file system removed in an apparent effort to make was might have been a viable laptop replacement into something that emulated the limitations of the Palm OS without managing to pick up any of the advantages that came along with them.

    That was when the Pocket PC was supposed to be a "Palm Killer". Well, it was cellphones that really tromped on the traditional Palm, and Microsoft almost completely failed to get a position in that market while I see the Handspring/Palm Treo all over the place.

    Now they're going for a "Blackberry Killer". I wonder what that portends for their applications. Will they finally let the Windows CE platform really compete with the ultralight laptops and Tablet PC on anything like a level playing field?

  26. one device that will be running it by utexaspunk · · Score: 3, Interesting

    drool... say what you want about windows mobile, but i don't see any other devices with other operating systems that can do what windows mobile does. sure, there's plenty of room for improvement- it seems i have to reboot my ipaq 6315 every day or two, but no other device does as much as it can...

  27. Blackberry Killer? by CynicalGuy · · Score: 5, Interesting

    People dont use blackberries because of the OS. They use them because of the small form factor (new ones are even better) and the push email.

    Hell, I think PalmOne's Treo could kill the blackberry if it offered REAL push email and instant messanger applications.

    But knowing Microsoft, this thing is going to end up bundled with Windows Media Player, Internet Explorer, the entire Microsoft Office suite, and be just slightly too big for my pocket.

    I want: 1. small as possible 2. best screen possible 3. blackberry/treo keyboard 4. push email 5. IM

    That's it.

  28. Does anyone actually use Pocket Office? by FatRatBastard · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I have used the Handcom Office software maybe twice on my Zaurus, neither time for anything actually work related. Working on Word and Excel documents is pretty difficult on a PDA form factor, I have to imagine its downright useless on a phone screen.

    Is anyone really doing last minute alterations to presentations on their phone?

    1. Re:Does anyone actually use Pocket Office? by FunkSoulBrother · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I use Pocket Excel to keep track of my bowling scores when I'm at the bowling alley. It's neat to be able to generate a bunch of statistics. But I have to agree and imagine not too much "real" work gets done in Pocket Office.

  29. So is are the writing off the Embedded space? by LWATCDR · · Score: 2, Interesting

    This seems so weighted towards the Phone/PDA segment I have to wonder if Microsoft writing off the rest of the Embedded market to go after the PDA/Phone market?
    Of course Palm is going to build on top of Linux for there new version so It will be interesting to see what they do.

    --
    See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    1. Re:So is are the writing off the Embedded space? by Surur · · Score: 3, Insightful


      WM 5 is just the shell. The OS is the new Win Ce 5.1, on which you can run any shell. One of its main features is the integrated .Net compact framework. Also for higher power embedded devices there is always windows xp embedded.

      Surur

      --
      Information is the location of things. Computation is moving things around.
  30. But how big? by MosesJones · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The OS will integrate Smartphone, Pocket PC, and Pocket PC Phone Edition operating systems into one platform.

    That is quite a large functionality footprint, what is the target footprint for this thing? It would also be great if in the new version they could realise that a SmartPHONE is a PHONE first and a PDA second and stop with all the stupid bloody modal windows (volume is MODAL for godsake).

    Interesting, but in terms of marketshare its about as relevant as a new release of Mac OSX is to the desktop.

    --
    An Eye for an Eye will make the whole world blind - Gandhi
  31. Four words by Locke2005 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    "Single point of failure." I for one don't want to be unable to make or receive calls just because my PDA gets a virus or otherwise decides to act up. Think it doesn't happen? It happenned to Chad Dickerson No, I think all-in-one is a very BAD idea.

    --
    I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
  32. Personally... by Progman3K · · Score: 4, Insightful

    For me, it doesn't matter what product Microsoft develops anymore.

    I will always avoid all their products like the plague and use my influence to guide others to avoid them also.

    I know it sounds like trolling, but I'm not posting anonymously, and I AM serious, this is my opinion, and this is reality.

    I represent a segment of consumers who are completely fed up to the gills with Microsoft and are tired of constantly giving them another chance.

    This will again be just like all their other products; it'll be inferior, there'll be interoperability problems with everyone's else's products, and Microsoft will continue to promise that the next version will be perfect, which by now, we've all realized is bunk.

    Of course, if the product ever takes off at all, Microsoft will have realized their goal: to drive another competitor out of business. They'll then proceed to completely ignore the product and its users, just like they've done with Internet Explorer or Office. With no competition, there is no impetus to improve.

    So again, NO THANKS, Microsoft.

    There are alternatives, so support the other vendors, buy their products!

    Free speech AND free beer? YES, PLEASE!

    --
    I don't know the meaning of the word 'don't' - J
    1. Re:Personally... by praxis · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I pitty the poor folk that take advice about a product from someone who has formed an opinion about it by avoiding it. Granted, past history can certainly be a factor, but I personally like to make informed decisions. Sometimes I do the research myself, other times I turn to sources that do credible research on my behalf. I never take advice from an opinionated source which does not do credible research, and hope to urge others to also make informed decisions.

    2. Re:Personally... by Progman3K · · Score: 2, Informative

      >I never take advice from an opinionated source which does not do credible research, and hope to urge others to also make informed decisions.

      And well you should.

      I've used Windows since Windows/286 and I've written lots of software for Windows. I've also rolled-out lots of Microsoft products for various projects and work environments.

      I've made up my mind based on my own research and come to the conclusion that I have through logic.

      Sounds like you do the same. I can't argue that.

      --
      I don't know the meaning of the word 'don't' - J
  33. Why magneto? by panurge · · Score: 4, Funny
    For the few who don't know, a magneto is a self-energising spark generator for spark-ignition internal combustion engines. It consists, basically, of a magnet (duh), a coil and a contact breaker. Either the coil or the magnet rotates, generating current which passes through the coil until the breaker opens when, in accordance with the laws of conservation of energy, the energy has to go somewhere and some of it ends up in the spark. (Yes, this is real electrotechnology 101.)

    The hand-cranked generators used on early telephones and, for rather longer, on field telephones was also called a magneto, and I guess this is why Microsoft has expropriated yet another common word for its products.

    So from this important piece of information we can work out the features of magneto the operating system:

    • It will be capable of doing only one thing at a time
    • It will generate a lot of stray EMI
    • The user interface will suck: it will need a lot of hand cranking and point setting to work properly
    • It will be replaced by something better just as soon as it becomes available.
    And yes, I still have bitter and twisted memories of the magnetos on my Vincent, my Velo...in fact, every British motorbike I ever owned. Not that I'm in any way prejudiced (I was stupid to buy the things)
    --
    Panurge has posted for the last time. Thanks for the positive moderations.
  34. Re:Ah, I wish by Seraphim_72 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Heck, I would by a copy for that alone.

    "White shores...and beyond... the far green country under a swift sunrise."

    Um...your phone is ringing

    Shut up, let it ring (sigh)

    Sera

    --
    Slashdot, where armchair scientists get shouted down and armchair theologians get modded up.
  35. WinNames by kurt555gs · · Score: 2, Funny

    I saw some one here had a sig line that says it all:

    " WinCE + WinME + WinNT = WinCEMENT "

    I think from today forward M$ is going to have trouble getting the computer world (excluding the M$Fanboys) excited about anything.

    That is over even if they are and will continue to be rich

    Cheers

    --
    * Carthago Delenda Est *
    1. Re:WinNames by Dirtside · · Score: 2, Funny
      I saw some one here had a sig line that says it all:

      " WinCE + WinME + WinNT = WinCEMENT "

      It was probably a reference to this (funny) old image:

      http://www.geocities.com/rcwoolley/

      --
      "Destroy science and religion. Science would re-emerge exactly the same; but not religion." - Penn Jillette, paraphrased
  36. Re:Blackberry Killer? by praxis · · Score: 2, Informative

    From what you want:

    1. small as possible -- Got that, I have a Mpx200 which is 4 oz. and 1.90x3.5x1.06 in. Certainly a phone form factor first.
    2. best screen possible -- It's an old phone, so it's only 176x220 pixel display, but certainly works for my phone/PDA needs. Newer devices will have better displays I'm sure.
    3. blackberry/treo keyboard -- Nope, shortcoming here, but once again, it's an old device.
    4. push email -- EAS allows push email, calendar, etc.
    5. IM -- Has that too.

    Added things I like you didn't mention: over-the-air update, passthrough connection when connected via USB to a computer, use as a modem.

  37. Microsoft Reader? by AmicoToni · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Something that has been inexplicably missing for a long time from Microsoft's Smartphone software is Microsoft Reader.

    Now that all the versions of Windows Mobile have been unified, it is legitimate to expect Microsoft Reader to move to smartphones as well. It is a market Microsoft has surprisingly neglected to explore so far.

    Any reports about Reader and WM2005?

  38. Its NOT the OS... by hacker · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Bill Gates and many other senior members of companies that produce operating systems delusionally believe that people somehow care about the OS that their computer or device runs.

    They don't.

    People care what their device DOES , not what their device is POWERED by.

    If these devices run OS/2, Amiga, DOS, whatever... does not matter. If it does what they want, talks to their other devices in a non-confusing way, and can read their data formats (PIM data, documents, media formats, etc.), the OS does not matter.

    In fact, with virtualization becoming more and more popular (and available), your hardware will be running multiple OS' at the same time and guess what... you won't care.

    The data is what matters. The function is what matters. The OS does not matter.

    The only reason we care about the OS right now, is because in most cases (i.e. Microsoft), the OS lacks that functionality, or the functionality it provides is horribly broken, so we fight with it, instead of work with it.

  39. Re:Blackberry Killer? by o-hayo · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Hell, I think PalmOne's Treo could kill the blackberry if it offered REAL push email and instant messanger applications.

    There is a REAL push email option. The software you seek is Good. No, really. Check out GoodLink ( www.good.com ) and see how they are already one-upping blackberry by doing crazy wacky things like letting you CHOOSE from a bunch of different phones and setup a new managed phone without touching or cradling it, EVER. Palm and Windows Mobile devices are supported with talks of Symbian on the way. The UI is much nicer than BB phones (according to actual BB users) and aside from issues with the Treo 650 itself, the software has been problem free since day 1.

    Disc: Not from an employee, but a satisfied customer and guy who has to admin the stuff.

  40. Named after... by halcyon1234 · · Score: 3, Funny
    An OS... from Microsoft... named after a character... who is an evil super villian bent on taking over the world.

    Good job.

  41. Y'know... by Akardam · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Take the example of two people:

    The first person sticks his hand in boiling water, gets burned, and from there on out avoids sticking his hand in boiling water.

    The second person sticks his hand in boiling water, gets burned, waits a while, then sticks his hand right back in the boiling water just to see if its still hot.

    History generally considers the first person to be the wiser. No pun intended, but you can only get burned so many times before it just isn't worth it any more.

  42. Don't forget the hardware! by Roadkills-R-Us · · Score: 2, Insightful

    MS is rumoured to have a new AllInOne phone coming out to work with this OS. The electronics are near production at Lucas in the UK...

  43. Re:What exactly is a Blackberry Killer? by BewireNomali · · Score: 3, Interesting

    i agree with you on most points.

    however, having used a blackberry, a treo, and a pocket pc device, i honestly have to say that the blackberry's design and form factor are geared more specifically towards effective mobile communication than the other two devices. for calls, both outgoing and incoming, most blackberries are a one-hand device. scroll wheel to a contact number, one click and i'm on a call. one click and I'm taking an incoming call. I can parse contact data from text messages and emails directly into my contacts, again with one handed operation... no stylus... no menus. Its practicality as a communications device more than makes up for its ugly form factor. As an end user, I'm no so much concerned that hardware and software protocols are closed. I care that it works and it's pretty f*cking useful. Well, I do care that exporting data from contacts is a f*ckin bitch, but it's my only major gripe. It works so well that I don't really care that it doesn't look so good. It's like that chick that isn't so hot but is a really good no-strings lay.

    I know I'm gonna get flamed by all the treo fanboys, but I don't get the hype about this POS. I had a palm tungsten C and that's a great f*ckin piece of work... but the treo is a joke. It weighs a ton and is unwieldy. It requires the use of a stylus which means two handed operation which all but obviates the usefulness of a communications device because it precludes multitasking. It's slow, and unlike other palm devices, not cleanly organized and functional. It's like the suicidal really hot chick with an eating disorder who, if you catch her in between well-measured medication doses, might be a really good lay. You're willing to be around her cause she's really hot, but ultimately, it just isn't worth your time.

    pocket PC devices have the most upside to me because they allow for the evolution of handheld devices. in that sense i think pocket pc devices will scale well. But that's the downside. having used many iterations of pocket pcs, you're so locked in by your hardware platform. The exact same build of pocket pc on one handheld could be brilliant on the one hand and excruciating on the other. hardware configurations are the monkey here. If you're not gettig top of the line hardware, you're f*cked. But pocket PC is definitely the dog's bollocks... and they're getting better about one handed use (again, depends on your hardware). this is like the really hot chick that you can only hook up with if you have all the bells and whistles that really hot chicks dig ($) - and she's a great f*cking lay.

    That said... blackberries serve their purpose well, but they will be killed off because I can't see how they can scale their hardware and software. As consumers begin to demand more and more from their handhelds, blackberries will need top-down redesigns to compete. If they're not in the pipeline with that already, I'd say that thy're f*cked.

    --
    un burrito me trampeó.