Slashdot Mirror


Cisco Confirms Arrest In Theft Of Its Code

spafbnerf writes "Informationweek is reporting on Cisco Systems' confirmation of an arrest in connection with the theft of its IOS 12.3 source code last year. On Tuesday, The New York Times reported that federal officials and security experts have acknowledged that the theft of the Cisco source code was part of a wider pattern of thousands of attacks on military and research computers perpetrated by an unknown number of individuals." From the article: "The FBI fully recognizes the inherent sophistication and global nature of intrusion investigations...As such, we have worked hard to develop strong partnerships within the international law-enforcement community. In this case, we have been working closely with our international partners to include Sweden, Great Britain, and others. As a result of recent actions, the criminal activity appears to have stopped."

68 of 113 comments (clear)

  1. I can confirm this by kote-men-do · · Score: 3, Funny

    The parents of the teenager in question have taken all his pokémon games.

    1. Re:I can confirm this by Masami+Eiri · · Score: 1

      Actually.. no. I know guys that are hitting 20 that enjoy the Pokemon games.. hell, my uncle, who's in his 30s likes them. The games aren't that bad. Nothing groundbreaking, but not bad.

  2. do they believe it themselves? by nietsch · · Score: 5, Interesting
    As a result of recent actions, the criminal activity appears to have stopped.


    I read that as: "As a result, the criminals have realised they were being watched and have cleaned up their act, and have made sure they are not noticed by 'them' anymore.

    Now on to the FA.
    --
    This space is intentionally staring blankly at you
    1. Re:do they believe it themselves? by DarthVain · · Score: 3, Insightful

      "As a result of recent actions, the criminal activity appears to have stopped."

      I read that as: "As a result, the criminals have already gotten all the code they were looking for, and now have moved on. This is why there doesn't appear to be any more activity."

    2. Re:do they believe it themselves? by notsoanonymouscoward · · Score: 1

      now Crashoveride and the others can hack the gibson and stop Plague from unleashing the Da Vinci virus!

      I can't wait to see some more of AcidBurn's clevage!!!

      --
      I ate my sig.
  3. Appears to have stopped - for now! by PacketScan · · Score: 4, Insightful

    They. Who ever they are, will be back if indeed it's more than a few people. When it comes down to it nothing is secure. There is always going to be a way for the smart/crafty to cercumvent anything put in place.
    Then again we could just write rock solid code. but that apparently is cost prohibitive.

  4. Over-confident by dbleoslow · · Score: 5, Funny

    "As a result of recent actions, the criminal activity appears to have stopped."

    Thanks to the bear patrol recently put in place in my neighborhood, all bear-related activity appears to have stopped.

    1. Re:Over-confident by NekkidBob · · Score: 5, Funny

      I wish to buy your tiger repelling rock...

    2. Re:Over-confident by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      I was wondering if you were interested in purchasing this rock that keeps tigers away?

  5. "appears to have stopped"... by SharpFang · · Score: 3, Funny

    lol omfg idiots bought it!!!
    Yeah. Stay put for 2 months more. And just in case you have something urgent, tunnel through Luser832, I have planted enough "evidence" on his PC to keep him in prison for 50 years.

    --
    45 5F E1 04 22 CA 29 C4 93 3F 95 05 2B 79 2A B2
  6. Too bad... by daveschroeder · · Score: 2, Funny

    Maybe the thief could have made IOS more stable and secure. I'm beginning to think anyone could do a better job...

    1. Re:Too bad... by 1evilmonkey · · Score: 3, Funny

      Thats why I have a Linksys wifi router. It works as good as everything else and has the nifty little cisco brand on it to make it look expensive and impressive.

      --
      crap
    2. Re:Too bad... by EvilTwinSkippy · · Score: 4, Funny
      I have found Cisco routers to be remarkably stable.

      We have a 7100 series that I use as a step-ladder to access stuff on a top shelf. It has never teetered or shifted.

      --
      "Learning is not compulsory... neither is survival."
      --Dr.W.Edwards Deming
    3. Re:Too bad... by natrius · · Score: 1

      We have a 7100 series that I use as a step-ladder to access stuff on a top shelf. It has never teetered or shifted.

      And if it does start to teeter one day, you can fix it since you have the source now!

      Or something like that.

    4. Re:Too bad... by OnlineAlias · · Score: 1

      Oh dood, those were crap. I have 2 7120's that holding up the end of my table right now, $30k worth of routers...even Cisco can't get them to do what a Linksys can do now....

    5. Re:Too bad... by nharmon · · Score: 1

      Cisco's proprietary vlan trunking standard is ISL, which they seem to have abandoned. Newer switches now support 802.1Q, which is an open standard that works with Linux and MS Windows.

    6. Re:Too bad... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Link to 802.1Q std (just in case people thing only the RFC's are available free). Oh - if anyone actually intends reading it, take a *LOT* of V or Red Bull or whatever passes for caffiene in your neighbourhood

  7. If you're gonna get "nicked" by Cisco... by pandrijeczko · · Score: 2, Funny

    ...at least walk out with a 6500 router under your coat that you can flog on Ebay!

    --
    Gentoo Linux - another day, another USE flag.
    1. Re:If you're gonna get "nicked" by Cisco... by CrankyFool · · Score: 3, Funny

      That's a horrible idea, and I wish slashdot would stop advocating these sorts of measures.

      When was the last time you tried lifting a 6500, let alone walking with it under your coat? Only do this if you manage to drive out with a 6500 router AND Chambers' Porsche*.

      *No, I don't know what he drives. Artistic license.

    2. Re:If you're gonna get "nicked" by Cisco... by Des+Herriott · · Score: 2, Funny

      That'd be an achievement, given that a 6500 is a switch.

    3. Re:If you're gonna get "nicked" by Cisco... by pandrijeczko · · Score: 1
      IANACE (I Am Not A Cisco Expert) but I'm told by a Cisco Expert that a 6500 is a layer 3 switch with routing capabilities - so I'll agree to a stalemate!

      However, I'd still stick it on Ebay as a router because nobody tells the truth on Ebay.

      --
      Gentoo Linux - another day, another USE flag.
    4. Re:If you're gonna get "nicked" by Cisco... by pandrijeczko · · Score: 2, Funny
      In a penal establishment somewhere...

      "Moi name's Slasher, I'm doin' time for armed robbery. This 'ere's Pistols, 'e killed his parents. Whas yer name, sonny, and whachoo in 'ere for?"

      "I am being Hans, I am Svedish, I took code from Cisco."

      "Well, 'Ans, drop yer trousers, grab yer ankles and let's see where yoov 'idden it then.."

      --
      Gentoo Linux - another day, another USE flag.
    5. Re:If you're gonna get "nicked" by Cisco... by dlZ · · Score: 1

      No, you have to sell it as a "Porn Enabled Router" to get the best sale!

      --
      rm -rf ./evidence @ punkcomp
    6. Re:If you're gonna get "nicked" by Cisco... by OnlineAlias · · Score: 1

      A 6500 was a backplane system, and if it had a RSM in it, it could route too. Just depended on how it was configured....

  8. Theft? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    More like "liberation".

    Information wants to be free.

  9. Appearances are deceiving by digitaldc · · Score: 3, Funny

    "As a result of recent actions, the criminal activity appears to have stopped."

    Wow, that statement really made me feel better.

    --
    He who knows best knows how little he knows. - Thomas Jefferson
  10. Light on evidence? by eddy · · Score: 1

    The fact that every report says "since the arrest, the intrusions have stopped" ought to tell us something...

    --
    Belief is the currency of delusion.
    1. Re:Light on evidence? by EvilTwinSkippy · · Score: 2, Insightful
      The fact that every report says "since the arrest, the intrusions have stopped" ought to tell us something...

      Mainly that the folks who are behind the break ins read the same news articles we do.

      --
      "Learning is not compulsory... neither is survival."
      --Dr.W.Edwards Deming
    2. Re:Light on evidence? by Veinor · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Or maybe they're not really bothering to verify it, but instead quoting each other, since if one of them says it, it must be true!

  11. Someone Better Talk to Bush by geomon · · Score: 2, Insightful

    As such, we have worked hard to develop strong partnerships within the international law-enforcement community.

    Had Bush known that this was occurring, he would have stepped in and stopped this attack on US sovereignty.

    We all know that the US will always choose the unilateralist role in defeating enemies of the State.

    (chill... It is a joke.)

    --
    "Rocky Rococo, at your cervix!"
  12. In other news by markov_chain · · Score: 2, Funny

    Eurasia is now at peace with Oceania, and the harvests of grain improved 20% compared to last year ;)

    --
    Tsunami -- You can't bring a good wave down!
    1. Re:In other news by EvilTwinSkippy · · Score: 1
      Wait, hasn't Eurasia always at peace with Oceania?

      Oh well, that's still double plus good.

      --
      "Learning is not compulsory... neither is survival."
      --Dr.W.Edwards Deming
  13. Phew! by Dirtside · · Score: 4, Funny

    Thank goodness Cisco finally got its source code back! Now the source code is safe and sound, never to be seen again by anyone outside Cisco.

    --
    "Destroy science and religion. Science would re-emerge exactly the same; but not religion." - Penn Jillette, paraphrased
    1. Re:Phew! by noidentity · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Thank goodness Cisco finally got its source code back! Now the source code is safe and sound, never to be seen again by anyone outside Cisco.

      At least they can continue development on it. It must have been costly to have to put development on hold while the source code was missing.

      Or maybe the code wasn't stolen, rather copied.

  14. torrent? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Anyone got a torrent?

  15. Damn I was wrong! by Evil+W1zard · · Score: 2, Funny

    You mean it wasn't Habib Marwan and his terrorist cell that stole the IOS code to reverse engineer it into a software chipset that could be used to simultaneously override a nuclear powerplant and a nuclear warhead! Man I was way off.

    --
    News Reporters Make Tasty Polar Bear Treats!
  16. The suspect by LarsWestergren · · Score: 4, Funny

    The suspect is a 16 year old boy from Uppsala, Sweden, my hometown. I bet he doesn't feel as clever now as he used to. :-)

    I look forward to Maureen O'Gara's next scoop though: "He came from Uppsala, the headquarter of famous open source company mySQL AB! Also the place where Vikings once slaughtered Christians in pagan rituals! All a coincidence? I think not!!"

    --

    Being bitter is drinking poison and hoping someone else will die

    1. Re:The suspect by LarsWestergren · · Score: 1

      Why shouldn't he? When was the last time exactly we were at the focus of internatinal government cooperation and made a big article in the New York Times and the Front Page of /.?

      Yes, but on the other hand he got famous for being stupid enough to get caught.

      A nice paradox summed up in the movie Young Poisoner's Handbook. Our anti-hero has decided to become the world's greatest poisoner. But the greatest poisoner can't get caught, so how is he going to get famous?

      --

      Being bitter is drinking poison and hoping someone else will die

    2. Re:The suspect by Christopheles · · Score: 1

      Contriwise, I bet he feels that the FBI is more clever now than he used to.

  17. Must be nice to have such confidence by PenguinBoyDave · · Score: 3, Funny

    Since I bitch-slapped a hacker trying to break into my system I have not seen another one trying. All that activity must have stopped as well. Wow...I suddenly feel all is right with the world

    --
    I'm not a troll, but I play one on Slashdot.
    1. Re:Must be nice to have such confidence by EvilTwinSkippy · · Score: 4, Funny

      RFC37337 - Corporal Punishment over UDP

      --
      "Learning is not compulsory... neither is survival."
      --Dr.W.Edwards Deming
    2. Re:Must be nice to have such confidence by Kosi · · Score: 1

      Does this mean that my whish for the Remote Strangulation Protocol can finally be fulfilled?

  18. Appearences by pocketfullofshells · · Score: 1

    can be deceiving...

    I hope whoever it was at least left an easter egg behind.

  19. Firewall? by nogginthenog · · Score: 5, Funny

    Looks like they could do with a decent firewall to keep out intruders. Can anyone recommend a good one?

    1. Re:Firewall? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      I hear Cisco is pretty good....

      Oh Wait...

    2. Re:Firewall? by _Sprocket_ · · Score: 1

      Dude. Don't you know they just route the firewall and then hack your proxy? A firewall isn't gonna do anything for you. It's the self-defending network you gotta have.

    3. Re:Firewall? by KenFury · · Score: 1

      Just dont use that abortiong of hardware called a PIX. A bigger peice of shit I have not seen in a while.

  20. Swedish reporting: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    Apparently the villain was a 16-year old kid.
    http://www.dn.se/DNet/jsp/polopoly.jsp?d=678&a=413 232

  21. Decentralized Networking... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The more and more I hear about these types of hacks, attacks, and thefts, it makes me wonder why many big companies still choose to remain 'online.'

    We all know that the internet can be a very dangerous place, so why would any company in their right mind choose to have computers with potentially sensitive source code or database information remaining on a publicly facing network?!

    Very few machines in a given development or database office should have Internet access, and these machines should not be directly connected to the rest of the company. The reason you spend all of that cash on networking equipment is for private closed intranets, it's not to get you online!

    Plugging into the internet is just like going public, no matter how many basements with feline guards at the doors you have in place, you can never be 100% secure.

    1. Re:Decentralized Networking... by twiddlingbits · · Score: 1

      Cisco likes to test it's equipment within Cisco in real business world scenarios, unfourtunately if it breaks then it's Cisco that has it own stuff stolen which means other Cisco systems could be compromised. It's brilliant in concept but it can be very lacking in execution.

  22. No more hackers! by RealProgrammer · · Score: 1

    Our real thanks should go to OJ Simpson. Without his efforts to find his wife's real killer, more Hollywood wives would keep getting hacked.

    --
    sigs, as if you care.
    1. Re:No more hackers! by EvilTwinSkippy · · Score: 1
      Our real thanks should go to OJ Simpson. Without his efforts to find his wife's real killer, more Hollywood wives would keep getting hacked.

      Hey this is slashdot, not slash Dot.

      --
      "Learning is not compulsory... neither is survival."
      --Dr.W.Edwards Deming
  23. Use the source, luke. by zoftie · · Score: 1, Funny

    They should have used open source, you don't get arrested for stealing open source code, right?

  24. Re:Appears to have stopped - for now! by KiloByte · · Score: 1

    So... now the bad guys enjoy the code they can read in peace, and look for security holes to their heart's content. They face just a small bunch of overworked developers and very little review.

    On the other appendage, a vintage PC in my basement churns packets on its cozy shelf, with an OS that has seen continuous attention of millions of developers...

    Face it, the bad guys _will_ have guns. No laws or copyrights can stop them. By obstructing the access you limit the amount of kids but do nothing against determined attackers. But if you let the NRA, er, wait, the Free Software community ensure the public will have guns... hmm, my analogy is kind of shot. You know what I mean :p

    --
    The creatures outside looked from Alt-Right to Antifa; but already it was impossible to say which was which.
  25. Don't they WANT it secure? by mreed911 · · Score: 5, Interesting
    From TFA: "The stolen code was a portion of Cisco's Internetworking Operating System version 12.3. The incident has been a matter of concern because malicious hackers might find flaws in the code that could be exploited to impair the functioning of Cisco's routers."

    Translation: We don't have time to QA this code, so we'd rather not have anyone do it themselves, either, then hack us with the holes we neglected to look for in the first place.

    Ugh. Sometimes I wonder if there ought to be an open-source REQUIREMENT in RFP's to vendors. Hell, code availability has HELPED Linksys (who's also Cisco!) - folks have "hacked" it to make it MORE robust, but you don't see any greater number of "hacks" for Linksys products than you do for anyone else...

    Maybe Cisco ought to focus on the security BASICS (it's still easiest to get into some else's network because they never changed the default password than it is to script-kid some mutated hack into working) rather than worrying that "outsiders" might actually harden their products FOR them...

    1. Re:Don't they WANT it secure? by _Sprocket_ · · Score: 1

      Cisco has to be finding itself in a rather uncomfortable situation. After all, Open Source is insecure by nature due to the availablity of code to malicious eyes... right? It is according to the Alexis de Tocqueville Institution. Couple that claim without the counter "many eyes" claim... and it wouldn't be suprising if Cisco's been flooded with anxious calls from various IT managers.

      Whether the concern is legitimate or not is a different issue.

    2. Re:Don't they WANT it secure? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Do you have any idea what it's like to maintain a codebase for something as enormous and complex as IOS?

      I'm really growing tired of people blindly presenting the position that EVERYTHING would be better open-source.

      Look at the number of security vulnerabilities over the last 5 years for the Linux kernel. Now look at the vulnerabilities over the same 5 years for Cisco IOS.

      Simply having something opensource does not imply that the end result will be more secure. And the prospect of having something like IOS being audited by criminals (at least intelligent ones) is almost a guarantee that at some point large chunks of the Internet will go down. That's not a chicken little attitude - it's just reality.

      Also for what it's worth, as someone who worked on this particular case, it *is* a huge relief that "the criminal activity has stopped". In case you didn't know, this particular 'kid' and his friends had upwards of 100,000 accounts across every major university, government lab, company, and military branch you can think of. A certain super-computing facility was one of the earliest compromised networks and password collectors ensured that these attackers got accounts all over the world.

      And for the love of God, don't even think of playing the "well they deserved it because they weren't secure" card. That's one of the biggest screwball concepts I've ever heard of, and my typical response is that with that logic it would be fine that if you just *once* forgot to lock the door to your home, that I would then have every 'right' to go into your home, trash it, and burn it to the ground. Or even better - you *do* lock your doors, but some clever thief got his hands on the plans for your particular Schlage lock and picks it. Does that make you or Schlage incompetent idiots? No.

      It's an arms race, people. Nobody is going to win, but don't belittle the people who put their life's work into trying to at least slow down the bad guys just so you can have an Internet around to read slashdot and post what you perceive to be extremely cogent arguments on something you don't know the first thing about.

  26. Re:dumb moderator by geomon · · Score: 1

    Come on FUNNY mods!!

    Daddy needs a new karma bump!

    --
    "Rocky Rococo, at your cervix!"
  27. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  28. Re:dumb moderator by geomon · · Score: 1

    Your original post wasn't funny.

    That's what I thought. It was just an offhand remark, not a standup show.

    What you think means less to me.

    Funny moderations don't affect your karma.

    I never said they did. I was commenting on the criticism of the 'dumb moderator' poster.

    I guess I should be less oblique so that my comments can reach the education level of folks like yourself.

    --
    "Rocky Rococo, at your cervix!"
  29. The Terrorists on Fox's "24" couldn't hack Cisco by searchr · · Score: 1

    On last week's "24", when the terrorist hackers tried to perform a network attack on the "CTU" headquarters, it was Cisco's network protection system that thwarted them. In fact, when all of the characters stopped what they were doing (chasing down a stolen nuclear device from being detonated on U.S. soil.) and stood around talking about how their Cisco systems were self-defending and how great that was, and those scenes were intercut with screenshots of the Cisco defense system at work saving the day, I was actually kind of lulled into believing that Cisco could protect them, or even themselves, from a nefarious hacker.

    Next thing you know, they're going to tell me that the evil terrorists in the world don't actually use Alienware laptops, like in "24", when the lead terrorist was shown for several scenes, bathed in the cool blue glow of his Alienware Area-51, and using it to start the countdown on his nuclear missile.

    I don't know what's real, and what's branding anymore!!!

  30. Re:theft? by Mr+Smidge · · Score: 1


    Well, the article says theft, so we better believe it!

    I feel so sorry for all the Cisco employees having to write out all that code again because it was stolen.

  31. Starwars by taloner · · Score: 1

    May the source be with you....

  32. Yes: and that's why they arrested the boy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    From TFA: "The stolen code was a portion of Cisco's Internetworking Operating System version 12.3. The incident has been a matter of concern because malicious hackers might find flaws in the code that could be exploited to impair the functioning of Cisco's routers."

    Translation: We don't have time to QA this code, so we'd rather not have anyone do it themselves, either, then hack us with the holes we neglected to look for in the first place.


    Well, if security isn't a concern in our daily lives; why should computers be somehow different?

    If someone steals a master key from GM, he goes to jail; he isn't charge just with petty theft, even if he doesn't attempt to use the key himself. The authorities (police and lawmakers) don't want that kind of information (how to make a master key) getting out. They don't blame GM for having a common exploit available in a large range of vehicles: they blame the guy who tried to obtain the forbidden knowledge.

    Similarly, they arrested a boy who gained forbidden knowledge that could be used to damage Cisco routers, if those routers aren't secure. Cisco is not held liable for any insecurities in their routers: and this is consistant with legal tradition.

    The fact is, cars are not secure, and GM isn't expected to accept liability for that. They're stolen every day, and the existance of master keys doesn't help much. Even without that, there are many are well-known classes of attacks by which thieves can compromise vehicle security.

    There's the "smashed windshield" attack, the "lockpick" attack, the "hotwire the engine" attack and many others. Tactics range from "social engineering" tricks (like lying to the valet to get the keys) to sheer brute force methods (such as clubbing the driver over the head, and stealing his car).

    The automotive industry hasn't dealt with this problem by manufacturing significantly more secure vehicles. Instead, it relies upon the police to enforce the laws against people who would take advantage of these exploits.

    Similar attitudes are seen in the housing industries (most windows aren't made of bulletproof glass), and in fact, in most industries where security is a concern. Security is expensive: and we're already paying for a police force to ensure that criminals aren't lurking about. [1]

    Within the computer industry, some programmers seem shocked that security is a low concern: and yet, they go home to places with breakable glass in the windows. There's an exploit for that, too: it's called a "flying brick attack", and it's nastier than your average DDOS...

    In short, they arrested the boy, because it's consistant with what the laws say, and with what the police do. If you want to change that, talk to your local politicans...
    --
    AC

    [1] I didn't say it was working... just that the concept was there...

    1. Re:Yes: and that's why they arrested the boy by _Sprocket_ · · Score: 1
      If someone steals a master key from GM, he goes to jail; he isn't charge just with petty theft, even if he doesn't attempt to use the key himself. The authorities (police and lawmakers) don't want that kind of information (how to make a master key) getting out. They don't blame GM for having a common exploit available in a large range of vehicles: they blame the guy who tried to obtain the forbidden knowledge.

      I would hope our network kit doesn't come with a master key preset from the factory. The industry tends to frown on things like backdoors.
      Similarly, they arrested a boy who gained forbidden knowledge that could be used to damage Cisco routers, if those routers aren't secure.

      No - they arested the boy you gained access to systems in major private and government networks. The key here is the word "government". You can toy with business networks and have a chance of slipping away if chasing you is going to cost too much; there's that bottom line to think about. The Government tends to ignore cost and focus entirely on the legal (among other factors) side of things.
      The automotive industry hasn't dealt with this problem by manufacturing significantly more secure vehicles. Instead, it relies upon the police to enforce the laws against people who would take advantage of these exploits.

      And things like factory installed alarms, Lowjak, OnStar... those are just flashy lights. Nothing to do with offering security.
      Within the computer industry, some programmers seem shocked that security is a low concern: and yet, they go home to places with breakable glass in the windows. There's an exploit for that, too: it's called a "flying brick attack", and it's nastier than your average DDOS...

      At work, I see over 150 - 200 thousand debatably hostile connections a day (considering we can't safely differentiate curiosity from more sinistar motives). My home sees less than 5 strangers passing on the street a day. Work sees around 20,000 actual attacks a day (probably due to worms - ignoring spyware and any virus outbreak in our network). I've seen no evidence of any attempts to break in to my home. If your home was instantly available to a world-wide population of faceless bodies, including those with bad intent... you might be a bit more concerned about that glass.

      Furthermore, the functional difference in a high security environment is considerably different than a high security one in brick-and-morter space. Likewise, the expense is considerable even without trying to regain some degree of the lost functionality. Not so in the electronic world. Good code, good encryption, good protocols... these all have comparitively little cost to implement considering the alternatives.

      Incidently, safety IS important in the physical world too. If GM put out a car that had a faulty design that caused a danger to the public, we would expect them to foot the bill for a recall and refit to solve the problem.
  33. They don't. by Just+Some+Guy · · Score: 1
    why would any company in their right mind

    By definition, no company in their right mind would do such a thing.

    I applied for a system administration job at a local hospital. During the interview, my would-be boss showed me their network diagram which looked something like:

    Internet | patient data

    After I picked my jaw back up off the floor, I asked what the vertical line represented. "That's our firewall!," he beamed. And what kind? "It's Gauntlet running on Windows NT."

    I didn't get the job, fortunately. I really don't wanna be around when HIPAA decides to claim IT department heads (as in "decapitated craniums", not as in "leaders").

    --
    Dewey, what part of this looks like authorities should be involved?
  34. Cisco got the code from Stanford University by carlos92 · · Score: 1

    They got the original router code from Stanford University in the first place, and now they complain so bitterly! Check this

  35. Re:The Terrorists on Fox's "24" couldn't hack Cisc by ebuck · · Score: 1

    It's a sad truth, but I believe in the intelligence of terrorists.

    I asume that they are at least intelligent enough to not waste incredible amounts of time, enery, and manpower to hack / break into Cisco so they can perform a very high level analysis of the source code for security holes, so they can hack into backbone routers and misconfigure / shutdown them.

    Instead of say, the dumb way of running into the telephone pole brining down the power lines outside or blowing up a critical resource.

    Most people aren't terrorized by routing problems, credit card theft, or failure to get to thier favorite website (Google included). It's an inconveince, a crime, and possibly very distressing, but it's not like they are having trouble sleeping with the looming threat that these things can happen.

    Today, if you're dressed badly and jaywalking, it's probably going to be seen as terroristic activity.