Slashdot Mirror


Water Now More Awesome Than Previously Thought

Dan writes "Wired has a great article about a guy who thinks we can provide unlimited energy , accelerate crop growth, desalinize and purify drinking water, obtain health benefits and provide air conditioning, all by pumping up water from the depths of the ocean."

68 of 708 comments (clear)

  1. More Efficient Coastal Farming by coop0030 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    This is a fantastic idea, except for one flaw. This would only work for cities near the coast. Where I'm from (Minnesota) I don't see how this could possibly work (Lake Superior is very cold though, that is a possibility).

    I like how he irrigates the farms. The sweating of the pipes below ground is a great idea. It seems much more efficient than spraying water everywhere, and having a lot of it evaporate.

    He may be a nut (or not, I'm not a good judge of character), but he does have a great way of looking at his environment.

    1. Re:More Efficient Coastal Farming by pHatidic · · Score: 4, Informative

      Actually Cornell University is cooled by Lake Source Cooling, and Lake Cayuga, while the biggest finger lake and fairly deep, is nothing all that special. Cornell was able to successfully cut its emissions and energy usage by about 90% with this thing, with no ill effects to the lake. I say that because some locals thought that it would kick up sedament which would cause eutrophication, but this never occurred. Also, people were worried that the warm water being dumped near the surface would impact the lake, but measurements showed that you can't even tell the difference in temperature more than 10 feel away. All in all, it was a really good move by the university. My only regret is that my freshman dorm wasn't hooked up to it so I didn't have any AC in the summer!

    2. Re:More Efficient Coastal Farming by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      You need to read the facts on the technology, go here:

      http://www.ocees.com/

    3. Re:More Efficient Coastal Farming by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      About the sweating of pipes, it sounds a lot like
      drip irrigation, pioneered some Israeli.

      It's been around since, what, the mid 60's?

      Oh, found information:
      http://www.netafim.com/About_Us/NETAFIM_Drip_Irrig ation_History.htm
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Drip_irrigation

    4. Re:More Efficient Coastal Farming by nokilli · · Score: 3, Funny

      Not only does the city have to be on the coast, it has to be tropical in climate. Otherwise, condensation won't occur, and that's where the fresh water comes from. The power generation too depends on temperature differential so it's no good in winter.

    5. Re:More Efficient Coastal Farming by CoolGopher · · Score: 4, Insightful
      I like how he irrigates the farms. The sweating of the pipes below ground is a great idea. It seems much more efficient than spraying water everywhere, and having a lot of it evaporate.

      Maybe I've forgotten too much of my highschool physics, but how does this really work? I was under the impression that the "sweat" on cold pipes is the result of the chilling of the surrounding air/material, which lowers its capacity for carrying water, thus in essence extracting it into solid form.

      So if the pipes sweat below ground, aren't they simply solidifying water that already is in the ground? If so, that's not what I'd call irrigation...

    6. Re:More Efficient Coastal Farming by Courageous · · Score: 5, Insightful

      This is a fantastic idea, except for one flaw. This would only work for cities near the coast.

      That's a goodly majority of all humanity.

      C//

    7. Re:More Efficient Coastal Farming by Quirk · · Score: 5, Informative

      The idea has been around a long time but then so has John Craven. Toronto is using the waters of Lake Ontario to provide air conditioning for a big slice of downtown realestate. The big problem with the Great Lakes is the needs of the urban sprawl that circles the Lakes' shores is putting stress on the resource, not to mention the political fray ensuing from many plans to alter the in/out flow of the watershed feeding the lakes. Being Canadian and watching the growing need for water in the US just makes me feel like we're gonna be on top of the quality of life index for a long time to come.

      --
      "Academicians are more likely to share each other's toothbrush than each other's nomenclature."
      Cohen
    8. Re:More Efficient Coastal Farming by ergo98 · · Score: 5, Informative

      The same sort of thing exists in Toronto.

    9. Re:More Efficient Coastal Farming by Mattintosh · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Bingo.

      And to top it all off, chilling the moisture out of the ground is going to dehydrate that soil, causing things to die. There's a good reason that cooling systems are used for dehumidification.

      However, if they're talking drip irrigation from buried pipes, then it's an excellent idea. However, it's nothing new. You can buy the materials to set a system like this up in your garden from the nearest hardware store with a decent lawn and garden department.

      And any water exposed to open air is going to have a certain amount of evaporation, so i'm not sure why he's on about that. I'd be willing to bet it's more efficient from an evaporation viewpoint to spray the water from above, since evaporation causes cooling. Cooling causes dehumidification of the surrounding material by condensation. If you evaporatively cool the soil by drip irrigation, the soil cools and releases it's moisture faster. It goes into the water table or an underground aquifer, taking with it unused nutrients, unsettled herbicides, unspent pesticides, and it still doesn't reach the plants for the time needed for them to absorb it. If you instead evap-cool the air above it, the water condenses out of the air and falls onto that soil, hydrating it and leaving nutrients and chemicals undisturbed for a longer time.

    10. Re:More Efficient Coastal Farming by NanoGator · · Score: 4, Funny

      "Wait till sealevels rise a few tens of metres..."

      Yeah, then there'll be no such thing as coastlines anymore.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    11. Re:More Efficient Coastal Farming by Analogy+Man · · Score: 3, Insightful
      Most of the world's population is near sea level. For every Minneapolis there is an LA and a New York.

      As is the case in this pilot project, the hardest up locations for resources are often islands so initially this may be a viable solution.

      Then consider how fast the Pacific drops off near Monteray CA. Consider Japan, Korea, Indonesia, east coast of India...turn on the satelite view in google maps and see how many populated coasts are near continental shelf drop-offs.

      --
      When the people fear their government, there is tyranny; when the government fears the people, there is liberty.
    12. Re:More Efficient Coastal Farming by PyWiz · · Score: 3, Informative

      Too bad there's not enough water on the planet for this to happen, huh?

      --
      -py
    13. Re:More Efficient Coastal Farming by ignorant_coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Hmmm...what's this feeling? Is that my brain's sarcasm lobe tingling?

    14. Re:More Efficient Coastal Farming by jcr · · Score: 4, Insightful

      chilling the moisture out of the ground is going to dehydrate that soil, causing things to die.

      Only if you're pumping that water off somewhere else. If you just use the pipes to chill the ground, then water from the air condenses on the ground. Upshot: irrigation.

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    15. Re:More Efficient Coastal Farming by David+Gould · · Score: 3, Interesting


      Yes, and if that were what TFA said they were doing, then you'd be right and the OP would look foolish, instead of vice versa.

      However, TFA talks about just running the cold water through the pipes, and specifically uses the term "sweating" in exactly the same way as it uses that term to refer to using cold pipes to extract water vapor from the air through condensation. The OP's point, which I was wondering about too, is that this doesn't seem to make much sense, because the soil wouldn't be full of vapor to condense.

      And of course, as another reply has already called you on, seawater isn't the best thing for irrigation, anyway.

      We can probably assume that the idea involves irrigating with the fresh water produced by the other part of the system. (Yeah, okay, figuring this out really isn't rocket science.) But TFA is apparently not just telling us what even we non-rocket-scientists could figure out, namely that having a supply of fresh water will come in handy for all the applications where fresh water is needed, including irrigation. It also talks about "cold irrigation" being a new way to increase crop yield. I'd assume the full answer is that cold irrigation is properly viewed as a whole separate innovation that's also made possible by this system, and that TFA just described it wrong.

      --
      David Gould
      main(i){putchar(340056100>>(i-1)*5&31|!!(i<6)<< 6)&&main(++i);}
    16. Re:More Efficient Coastal Farming by ajlitt · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Correct. The grandparent poster should read the article and notice that nowhere did it say that the sweat irrigation was to be derived from buried pipes. It even went so far as to describe one of his PVC cold water pipe sweat condensers in detail, noting that it was out in the open.

      The problem is, in costal areas, fresh water for irrigation is scarce, and current desalinization processes are expensive. His cold water system is an inexpensive (almost free) method for generating fresh water, and as such is practical for providing for irrigation as well as potable water.

      FYI, pipes sweat because the water (or whatever) fluid flowing through them is colder than the surrounding air, which causes water vapor in the air to condense on the pipes. This is the same principle used in dehumidifiers, though the water is usually an unwanted by-product in that case.

    17. Re:More Efficient Coastal Farming by SubtleNuance · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Canada literally taxes people to death, levying high taxes

      if you add what americans pay PRIVATELY for their health care to their tax bill - wait for it -- they become the most taxed people on earth.

      canadians arent taxed much really, consider what we recieve in return.

      amoung other things, universal healthcare of dubious quality and value

      nonsense. The care is excellent. I refer you to the 100% coverage, illness rates, infant mortality rates and life expectancy. Anactodal testimony that the system 'has too many waits' is mcdonalds-mall-shopping mindset where it isnt necessary. guess what: sometimes you have to wait. in the end, the only result is you couldnt cope with not being able to demand instant attention... which is really what the immature/uneducated are using as motivation to insult CHC.

      For what my father paid in that share of his taxes earmarked for national health care, his life could have been saved ten times over. Instead, an operable, discovered abdominal aortic aneurism was left untreated until it ruptured, killing him.

      Im sorry for your loss. But unfortunatley, some people die. Blaming your father on CHC is dubious. One person's loss isnt reason to consider the system broken. We are dealing with a massive system. Its got to be flexible but efficient.

      In the end, its still provides excellent care. There is no disputing this.

      But, why is it that Canada punishes traditional marriage and home ownership with its tax code?

      For welfare bums, perhaps. But certainly not for hardworking breadwinners: mothers and fathers struggling to put a roof over their kids' heads.


      Get off the fraser institute/reform mailing list. Youve fallen off the deep end. Those "welfare bums" you speak of are the middle class pal. Fostering the middle class -- or the general welfare -- is should be the sole goal of government.

      Is your alternative the american-style gap between rich and poor and its accompanying chaos? no thanks.

      Almost all of industrialized world has a social welfare system similar to Canada. Japan, australia, europe etc etc etc. *THIS* is why we have high standards of living -- by definition.

      America has a high standard of living because of its massive income... being at the top of the financial shitpile has its advantages (like being able to spend yourself onto the point of respecable OL-index), but their system is *NOT* a model to emulate.

      It *WILL* not work for anyone but the super rich. And, really, unless your superwealthy (ie: not middle class) than your self-interest is not served by wanting the changes you think you do.

      Its american jingo rhetoric infecting your politics pal. its time for some perspective. Take a trip to europe. read some foriegn papers.

  2. Ha, whatever by CypherXero · · Score: 4, Funny

    "You see, I apply cold temperatures to different parts of my body in three bastings. The third is the most complicated - I ice the terminuses of my lymphatic system. My body heals itself. Look at these hands," he says, opening and closing his fists. "I have no joint pain of any kind!"

    You're just numbing the pain. Idiot.

  3. Convenient... by B00yah · · Score: 5, Funny

    That /. would post a story on the awesomeness of water shortly after ThinkGeek begins selling a Water Powered Clock and a Mini Water Dispenser

    Stupid planted articles...I'll buy what I want!...oooh...clock...

  4. Obligatory Comic Book Guy... by mindaktiviti · · Score: 4, Funny

    Best. Headline. Ever.

  5. Dihydrogen Monoxide by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Be careful! Dihydrogen Monoxide can be a dangerous thing! Spread the word.

    1. Re:Dihydrogen Monoxide by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Damn you and your improper nomenclature!

      You don't enumerate singular atoms in inorganic molecules. The proper term is dihydrogen oxide.

  6. I see a flaw. by __aavhli5779 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Doesn't pumping up water from the ocean consume lots of energy?

    1. Re:I see a flaw. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      I think he is counting on inertia, or some more subtle effect I can't think of.

      The articale mentions that once the system is primed, it takes very little energy to keep pumping.

      Think about it. You're not pumping water up into the air, you're pumping water above other water. Without any pumping, the water will automatically lift the water to, you guessed it, sea level. You only neet to lift it the extra 30 feet to your beach side farm.

      Getting the system started probably takes a lot of power as you have to get all the water in your pipe moving fast enough so the water won't warm up by exchanging heat with the outside water, but one it's moving, inertia will help you keep going. You only need to make up for friction, and for the fact that cold water is slightly less dense.

      Then again the article mentions that the pipe acts like a siphon, so maybe there is some other effect I can't think of. Maybe the decreased pressure because of the pump makes water freeze and therefore rise? dunno.

    2. Re:I see a flaw. by peacefinder · · Score: 4, Informative

      That's what I assumed at first, too. But according to TFA it allegedly sustains itself like a siphon. It's mostly a one-time problem to get the flow started, I guess... then the siphon does most of the work. (Presumably with some level of ongoing pump assistance.)

      If true, that is a truly neat hack.

      --
      With reasonable men I will reason; with humane men I will plead; but to tyrants I will give no quarter. -- William Lloyd
    3. Re:I see a flaw. by Old+Wolf · · Score: 3, Insightful

      ...so the water wont warm up by exchanging heat with the outside water
      Insulate the pipe?

      ...the fact that cold water is slightly less dense

      Cold water is MORE DENSE than warm water. In fact the point of maximum density is about 4 degrees C, below that it gets less dense again (unlike most substances). But I didn't see the article mention the actual temperature of the water that's being extracted here, so maybe it is sub-4.

      My concern is, what if the pipe sucks up all these exotic bottom-dwelling fish?

  7. ocean temperatures? by victorl19 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Wouldnt excessive use of this method perhaps alter ocean temperatures?

    Maybe it will turn out like windmills- they take negligible energy out of the wind.

    1. Re:ocean temperatures? by werdnapk · · Score: 5, Informative

      Hydrothermal events (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hydrothermal_vent) exist in the oceans and pump out water at temperatures very close to, if not, at boiling temperatures. Pumping warm water back into the ocean is not going to make that much of a difference on the oceans.

    2. Re:ocean temperatures? by Kafka_Canada · · Score: 4, Funny

      Oceans are big - really big - you just won't believe how vastly, hugely mind-bogglingly big they are. You may think it's a long way down the road to the chemist, but that's just peanuts to oceans.

      (ref.)

      --
      Fuck it
    3. Re:ocean temperatures? by fireduck · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Pumping warm water back into the ocean is not going to make that much of a difference on the oceans.

      Perhaps. Perhaps not. In Huntington Beach, California, for the past several years, the beaches have had to be closed during the summer due to bacterial pollution. The obvious cause was the wastewater treatment plant dumping partially treated sewage 7 miles off shore, and that was somehow coming back onshore. Models, however, demonstrated that this was very unlikely because of water column stratification based on temperature (colder water, more dense, can't come up).

      One factor not included in the models was an electrical generator station on the beach that drew in ocean water for cooling. It would discharge the warm water back to the ocean. However, it discharged the warm water at depth. Warm water, being less dense, rose to the surface, creating a nice thermal pump that would carry with it the colder water at that depth, some of which was certainly co-mingled with the discharged sewage. (this wasn't the entire reason for the beach pollution, but certainly was a contributing cause.)

      So, yes, discharging warm water back into the ocean can have unintended effects.

    4. Re:ocean temperatures? by hoka_hey · · Score: 3, Informative

      There is a global circulation system called "Thermohaline Circulation". Basically some amount of water, North Atlantic Deep Water (NADW), sink around Labrador Sea, due high salinity and low temperature, until sea bottom (or almost there) and then spread around the world following the Stommel-Arons model.

      Due mass continuity, some amount of water must source that water and this is made by surface water, which is much warmer than that cold deep water. So, North Atlantic export cold water and import warm one, which means a positive heat balance. Without that, North America and Europe should be colder than they are now. Some people would call that "Climate Changes"! ;)

      P.S.: This is only part of the story, where I neglect some "details".

    5. Re:ocean temperatures? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting
      Us out here in the east coast know this problem pretty well, and when i was in highschool i was part of a research program that went out onto the ocean water and collected samples.

      Turns out the problem is when it rains, the sewage treatment plants reach compacity and dump untreated sewage into the ocean(this is pretty prevalent in the long island sound and would happen anywhere there is sewage treatment facilities and rain).

      Overflow spillage happens much closer to shore usually than any pipe they send out and 7 miles seems way excessive as the outflows i visited were at best 3 miles from the plant, most much much closer, like 4 - 8 hundred yards.

      The algae bloom and nitrate concentration near these pipes was insane. In fact in the long term this increases algae so much surface algae becomes so thick once vibrant life deeper down gets no light, dies, creates more bacteria and it can become a run away reaction. Eventually the algae bloom can cause massive amounts of fish to die, then mammals and so on.. quite nasty.

      But the problem happens without any warm water being added back into the ocean. Likely its just not understanding that its compeltely raw sewage overflowing because the plant cannot handle rain load and sewage load at the same time.

    6. Re:ocean temperatures? by birge · · Score: 4, Insightful
      So, yes, discharging warm water back into the ocean can have unintended effects.

      No, discharging sewage into the ocean can have unintended effects. That's the real problem.

  8. Re:Like all energy sources.... by Omkar · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Do you have any idea how much water there is in the ocean? And what the specific heat of water is? By the time we're pulling enough energy to make a difference, we'll have colonies in multiple solar systems.

  9. dude by thesalodonkey · · Score: 5, Funny

    it's way more awesome than you even know... now where did i put my bong... what? no way! that uses water too! sweeeet!

  10. Re:OTEC? Old news... by PHPgawd · · Score: 3, Funny

    OTEC? Holy Christ don't tell me that the Arabs are already planning on price-fixing this market before it even gets started!

  11. Re:Good, but... by NoMoreNicksLeft · · Score: 4, Informative

    If this technology is going to be so successful why isn't being tried all over the place?

    Because there are only a few islands throughout the world where it's practical. If you have a continental shelf, it ain't gonna work.

  12. Re:This is fantastic! by bobbis.u · · Score: 3, Insightful
    To be fair, the science seems perfectly sound (read the last page of the article where the methods are explained). Whether it is actually practical and viable is another matter.

    The "limitless energy" claim is pure hype, but just ignore that bit.

    As you point out, it is also important to evaluate the long term affects of removing significant amounts of cold water from the oceans (disrupting ocean currents, overall water temp. rises, etc). The drinking water generator would also lower the air humidity, which would cause problems if the project was done on a wide scale.

    I am sure this technology has applications in some circumstances (perhaps on oil rigs, remote islands, etc), but it is certainly not the solution to all our energy problems. Done on a large scale it would be unsustainable.

    I'm still waiting for practical fusion power...

  13. very low thermal efficiency by G4from128k · · Score: 5, Informative

    The efficiency of these system is extremely low because the temperature difference is so miniscule. For thermodynamic efficiency purposes temperatures are measured in Kelvin and temperature differences are only a few percent. The maximum efficiency of these plants in an ideal world is only 6%. When you account for the very large amounts of energy needed to pump huge volumes of water, the real efficiency is only 2-3%. This FAQ covers this and other issues.

    Yes, you can get energy, but not much.

    --
    Two wrongs don't make a right, but three lefts do.
    1. Re:very low thermal efficiency by Beryllium+Sphere(tm) · · Score: 3, Interesting

      But since you're not paying for the heat, the only effect efficiency has on the economics is the cost of the plumbing.

      What scares me is the environmental impact. These plants will pump a lot of bottom water back out near the surface. Because of the low efficiency, it will be a huge amount of water compared to the capacity of the power plant. Water near the bottom is oxygen poor because nothing can photosynthesize in the abyssal dark. It's nutrient rich because there's a steady rain of dead things from above. Dump that into hot oxygenated surface water and you're making an ecological change, which means the results are unpredictable. If you're lucky you get better fisheries from a fertilizing effect.

    2. Re:very low thermal efficiency by bcrowell · · Score: 4, Insightful
      The maximum efficiency of these plants in an ideal world is only 6%. When you account for the very large amounts of energy needed to pump huge volumes of water, the real efficiency is only 2-3%.
      A 2% efficiency isn't a problem. Efficiency tells you the ratio of the energy you can sell to the energy you put in. But if the energy you put in costs zero, then efficiency is an utterly unimportant number.

      What's more relevant is to compare the cost of building the plant to the money you can make by running the plant over its planned lifetime. That's the relevant figure of merit for a nuclear power plant, and I think it's the relevant one for an OTEC plant as well.

      The problem is that fossil fuels are artificially subsidized. Say I increase my energy use, and use an extra megajoule of energy derived from burning coal or gasoline. Well, I don't pay anything extra for the damage I'm doing with global warming, and I also don't pay enything extra for all the wars in the Middle East that the U.S. keeps getting into.

  14. Amateur. by JonTurner · · Score: 5, Funny

    I've been applying icy cold beverages (usually beer) to the INSIDE of my body for years, and let me tell ya what, after a six'er, let me assure you I'm feeling no joint pain at all. I do tend to have a headache the next day though...

  15. Never dealt with sports injuries, have you? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Seriously, cooling parts of yourself with ice causes the body to react and change bloodflow to the cooled area, usually increasing it markedly. The extra circulation does help healing.

    Funny thing is, heat kinda does the same thing, albeit not as effectively. Most folks don't like the ice and go for the heat for injuries, though, because heat "feels better". Icing an injury can actually be painful - drop a sprained ankle into a large bucket of ice and water for ten or twenty minutes and the first minute or so will have you twisting and turning and writhing as your foot hurts like hell from the cold water. The pain does go away though after a minute or two.

    Heat won't cause that pain. But heat will increase the internal bleeding from an injury if it's not fully healed yet, making the injury worse. Icing an injury will help stop any internal bleeding.

    At least that's what my college football trainer told me one time as I was sitting waist-deep in a whirlpool of ice and water to treat a pulled groin muscle. Talk about having your balls shrivel up...

    1. Re:Never dealt with sports injuries, have you? by lax-goalie · · Score: 5, Informative

      Well, yes. Yes I have,,,

      The poster's exactly right. Applying both ice and heat to an injury manage the circulation to the area.

      When you have an acute injury, say, a sprained ankle, you get an inflammatory response -- swelling. That's nature's way of splinting and immobilizing the injury. That problem is that all that swelling later turns to scar tissue, in essence, crippling you afterwards.

      What you're trying to do is to use cold to decrease circulation during the acute phase of an injury (to reduce swelling), and to use heat and motion to increase circulation during the chronic phase (to help break up scarring and create new muscle and bone). The rule of thumb is ice for the first three days, then heat, but really, you want to ice as long as there's heat coming off the injury.

      Both ice and heat will make you feel better. In my experience, ice is initially less comfortable, but WAY more effective in the end. And, ice combined with Aleve is even better. :-)

      As an aside, ultrasound therapy works the same way as heat, albeit in a more focused and comfortable way. You never want to use it acutely, but for things like old hamstring injuries, it's the freaking bomb.

      During rehab, (and frankly, if you're playing competitively, you're ALWAYS in rehab) you end up using both heat and cold. Usually, that's heat beforehand (to increase flexibility and circulation) and cold afterwards (to reduce inflamation from the trauma to old injuries). After a while, you just get used to the routine -- although spending a half hour with your balls in an ice whirlpool is never any fun.

      No, I'm not a doctor or a physical therapist, but after a broken leg, a blown hamstring, one remaining ligament between two ankles, twenty five years in the cage, and a trip playing in the World Games, you get to know these things...

  16. Age and whatnot by dacarr · · Score: 3, Funny

    He's 80, so he can't be lasting very long from here on out. I hope he wrote something down then.

    --
    This sig no verb.
  17. Re:Like all energy sources.... by dacarr · · Score: 4, Informative

    Lessee, water converts to steam and might break down, but odds are will recondense into... water. So where are we depleting this source? And if it's temperature, remember that heat rises, so by default (and by convection) this water is its own heat sink.

    --
    This sig no verb.
  18. Re:This is fantastic! by pla · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Luckily it's pure grade-A horse poop.

    Er, no, not really. Granted, this particular guy sounds a few gallons short of a hogshead, but deriving useable energy from cooling things off works exactly the same way as by heating them up - Namely, we can use the transfer of energy from the warmer side to the colder side to perform useful work (such as generating electricity). The absolute temperatures involves don't particularly matter.

    So why do virtually all human-created energy extraction technologies use warmer than ambient going to ambient as the two sides? Simple... We humans have enjoyed, at least for the past few millenia, a really easy way to get things hot (ie, fire and a supply of fuel that literally grows on (as?) trees). We have not had a convenient way of making something colder-than-ambient, except very recently (within the past century), and even then only by using the hot-to-ambient conversion to get electricity to do the ambient-to-cold conversion - Sort of trading one for the other, with a net loss in both conversions.

    Deep ocean water, however, provides exactly that - A nearly limitless supply of something colder than ambient, with a high enough specific heat that the energy we can extract from the temperature gradient FAR exceeds the energy needed to pump it in the first place.


    Imagine the climactic effects, and effects on the oceans ecosystems

    Now, here you make a good point. In the short term, or on a small scale, I would tend to say that we couldn't even come close to the natural processes that mix the oceans. But then, people thought the same about burning wood and later oil, until just the past few decades.

  19. This guy is even cooler than you might think by ScentCone · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Check out 'Blind Man's Bluff', which is about the post-WWII craziness that was Cold War submarine espionage. This guy is smart, smart, smart.

    --
    Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
  20. Some of his ideas are nuts by Locke2005 · · Score: 5, Interesting
    Conventional wisdom is that exposure to cold water causes arthritis, not cures it! Having worked one summer in a fish packing plant, I can attest that people do in fact hurt very much after spending 8 hours working with cold water...

    In theory cold-water energy works; anytime you have a temperature differential it can be harnessed to create energy according to the laws of thermodynamics. In practice, I'd question whether the constant pumping and maintenance (saltwater is highly corrosive) wouldn't require more energy than you get out of this system.

    One more thing: it's all fun and games until you suck a whale into the input pipe! But seriously, if you pump up nutrient-rich soup from the deep, in a few years your pipe is going to be so clogged up with marine critters that your flow rate is going to tend towards zero...

    --
    I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
    1. Re:Some of his ideas are nuts by Altima(BoB) · · Score: 4, Interesting

      One more thing: it's all fun and games until you suck a whale into the input pipe! But seriously, if you pump up nutrient-rich soup from the deep, in a few years your pipe is going to be so clogged up with marine critters that your flow rate is going to tend towards zero...

      Not to mention it'll be damn traumatic for anyone who digs out some of the deep sea's scarier denizens from those pipes...

      --
      Yup...
  21. For all you Engineering Types... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    For all you Engineering Types, here is a page with an animation which shows the basis for the technology:

    http://www.ocees.com/mainpages/Powersystems.html/

  22. Re:Deep Sea Environment? by ultramk · · Score: 3, Informative

    It's not untouched by man. From shipwrecks to dumping of garbage to all the usual pollutants, the deep-ocean is most certainly affected by our presence already. Of course, there's nothing new about this, it's just harder to tell when you can't actually visit most of this stuff in person, and have to send ROVs.

    As far as benthic thermal pollution, it already exists in the form of deep ocean thermal vents. Of course these are natural, even though they spew vast amounts of sulphur etc. I would suspect the ecosystem down there would handle this pretty well, since by the time the warm water got back down it would be nearly the same temperature as the surrounding water.

    Of course, it would be wise to run a full-scale test for a few years to determine the localized impact on the biosphere,(before widely deploying it) but I wouldn't jump to any conclusions until we see the findings.

    m-

    --
    You catch enchiladas by picking them up behind the head and holding them underwater until they don't kick anymore -VeGas
  23. He Doesn't Have the Half Of It... by the+eric+conspiracy · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Water is way more awesome than most people realize - because of hydrogen bonding -

    It is a key component in life; it's solvency and structure are what makes biochemistry work.

    It has about the widest range of temperature as a liquid of any simple material - making life possible over the face of the earth.

    It is the closest thing to a universal sovent we will ever see.

    Since it expands on freezing ice floats - just think what a mess the oceans would be if they were made of something that shrank when it froze, and the ice sank. The planet would have much wider extremes in temperature just because of that small fact.

    Wate has an immense heat capacity compared to other liquids... moderating our weather

    The beat goes on; it's unique chemistry and physics are whe we live off of every day.

  24. Cold Shower by Adam+Avangelist · · Score: 5, Funny

    No wonder my girlfriend always tell me to take a cold shower.

    Faster growing fruit + unlimited energy + free air-conditioning = multiple orgasms (profit!!!)

  25. Aspects of this already in use by limabone · · Score: 5, Interesting

    There are several office buildings in downtown Toronto that are cooled via cold water pumped from lake Ontario. http://www.enwave.com/enwave/view.asp?/dlwc/energy

  26. But it's not just a power plant by lheal · · Score: 5, Insightful

    There are several factors that make up for the inefficiency in power generation:

    1. the "fuel" is free.
    2. the water is used at least twice, which decreases the relative pumping costs
    3. power generation is just a positive side effect of supplying fresh water.

    Places like Saudi Arabia and Chile, which have lots of sun and salt water, but almost no fresh water, should jump on this. Saudi Arabia in particular, which has all the power it needs, could really benefit.

    --
    Raise your children as if you were teaching them to raise your grandchildren, because you are.
  27. Re:Do continue! by JonTurner · · Score: 4, Funny

    Sort of like the old phrase "no pain, no gain" eh? Well, we all know that beer makes the drinker smarter and I believe the headache problem is the drinker's awareness of the weak brain cells dying off. In the interests of science and a higher IQ, I'm prepared to work through the pain and set my sights on the lofty goals beyond. After a few keggers, I shall be left with only the smartest, most capable neurons and without those inferior, weak brain cells to get in the way, I will undoubtedly be the smartest person I know.

    That little headache problem was due to my prematurely stopping the drinking cycle too early, causing pain. Well, friend, I won't make that mistake again. I pledge to you that I will drink, nonstop, from here on.

    Slashdot, I salute you!

  28. Deep-Water Cooling is already in use... by SleepyLab · · Score: 3, Informative

    See http://www.enwave.com/enwave/dlwc/
    Anyone who has been to Dubai (I spent a few years there) knows that desalinization in such large capacities is both financially and technically sustainable... Irigation is a no brainer... Creating surplus energy, though ??? That does not sound plausible...

  29. Who modded him insightful? Try -1, utter nonsense by jcr · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Yes and by screwing with the oceans themodynamics we will have finally ruined earth as a livable habitat

    Ok, take a deep breath, and try to develop a sense of proportion. Oceans are big. Very, very big. We're talking miles deep, and thousands of miles across.

    Ocean thermal plants will work with pipes that are very, very small in proportion. Even 100-meter diameter pipes raising cold water from the deep, will have an effect that's just about immeasurable.

    Ocean thermal energy poses no more hazard of disrupting ocean currents, than windmills do of stopping the wind.

    -jcr

    --
    The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
  30. Re:Good, but... by ultramk · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Well, there are some other places... for example the Monterey Bay submarine canyon (bigger than the Grand Canyon, all underwater.). Fantastic place for deep-sea ROVs to explore.

    The biggest problem that I see is one of location. For a lot of this stuff to work, you need a few different things:
    1. Cold, deep water.
    2. Warm surface water.
    3. Warm, humid air.

    So you're limited to equatorial regions with available deep water. The UK won't be using this.

    m-

    --
    You catch enchiladas by picking them up behind the head and holding them underwater until they don't kick anymore -VeGas
  31. Re:P.H.D. by jcr · · Score: 5, Informative

    I have never heard of an "ocean engineer," as opposed to chemical engineer or electrical engineer.

    Ocean Engineering is a field of civil engineering, which is concerned with construction on coasts or under water. Offshore oil rigs are designed by Ocean Engineers, for example.

    -jcr

    --
    The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
  32. Re:Balonie? by NeMon'ess · · Score: 3, Informative

    The turbine produces electricity to lower the pressure in the chamber. The warm water loses energy when spins the turbine. If the water loses enough energy, there may be some electricity to power other things.

  33. Schauberger? by sunwolf · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Interesting - this looks like it has the influence of Viktor Schauberger, commonly known as the water wizard, behind it. Blueprints for an ocean water pump is in Living Water.

  34. But seriously... by serutan · · Score: 3, Funny

    Submitter deserves a golf clap for getting a Slashdot story accepted with a Fark headline.

  35. *ahem* by scosol · · Score: 3, Informative

    Correct. The grandparent poster should read the article and notice that nowhere did it say that the sweat irrigation was to be derived from buried pipes. It even went so far as to describe one of his PVC cold water pipe sweat condensers in detail, noting that it was out in the open.

    "Irrigation:
    Pipes carrying cold water run beneath fields of crops, sweating freshwater to irrigate plants and chilling their roots, promoting faster crop cycles."

    http://www.wired.com/wired/archive/13.06/craven.ht ml?pg=3&topic=craven&topic_set=

    --
    I browse at +5 Flamebait- moderation for all or moderation for none.