I said the Church of England is part of the government, because they have seats in the House of Lords; they don't have this because they are elected or appointed, they have this prerogative because they are part of the Church of England.
His rights as a private citizen are irrelevant
His rights are quite relevent, it would be unconstitutional to restrict the President -- like any other citizen -- from talking about his faith. President Bush has not shown any bias against non-Christains, as far as I know.
The Church of England, is part of the government of the United Kingdom, no Church or other religious institution is part of the United States government.
Why does the president mention worship in his political speeches?
Because the President is a politician.
Also the President, as with every citizen of the United States, is protected under the Constitutions so-called Free-Exercise and Freedom of Speech portions in the Bill of Rights, so he has the right to profess his faith in a public setting, even if it appears tacky and insincere.
Even here in god-fearing catholic Ireland, everyone I know thinks that creationism is bunk.
In spite of what the Slashdotters in the United Kingdom tell us; I still think the majority of their population believes in a creator. As it is backed up by statistics not an earge to defend ones nations intellectual superiority over the United States.
Why is this modded +5 Informative, its not true and its not informative?
In the United Kingdom, the Church of England, is one of the established State churches, it is part of the very government and even educational system. Church officals hold the right to take certain seats in the House of Lords and there are State ran religious schools and public schools where prayer(not necessarily Christain anymore) is part of a normal. The United States government is not based on any form of religion, nor do we have an established church (I wonder why).
In the United Kingdom the Church and religion is part of the very government. The United Kingdom, being one of the oldest countries has a lot of traditions, and many rights of citizens may not be directly written out, but through jurisprudence over the years, these rights have been extended. Our(American) founding fathers made it very clear that they did not want established State churches or any form of ecclesiastical influnce in the government, hence the very important Establishment Clause.
Even though I agree with your view of having a necessary defense against the government. Having the same rifles the military uses is not effective enough against a modern military force. Iraq which is no where near as expansive as the United States has much more automatic rifles, inspite of them being banned by Saddam failed to stop the U.S. invasion. U.S. Troops invaded and took over a foreign country with little over a couple hundred initial casualties. Many semi-automatic rifles can be turned into fully automatic rifles with a few modifications, this is good because it prevents Joe PostalEmployee from buying and using one against his family/co-workers after things don't go his way.
If push comes to shove, and the Constitution is further layed to the wayside by the republicans -- I'm hoping the sympathy of the military for killing fellow Americans in a civil war will prevent much bloodshed. However, this is not much to hope for as the Civil War was the bloodiest war in United States history.
I don't like the way you portray civil rights and feminist lobbiest, who are mostly out to do good by advancing society. Some lobbiest organizations are so powerful they get Americans killed. The Iraqi NRA for example, most assuredly backed by their American comrades, convinced the Bush Administration it was the best policy to allow Iraqi citzenry to own machine guns -- still illegal in the United States.
I have nothing against an armed citizenry in a stabalized nation, such as the United States. But in Iraq where Americans are getting killed/wounded by these weapons it is best to confiscate them, and foolish not to.
Ofcourse this post may be portrayed as an artful way to turn the juggernaut of nerdish scrutiny, that is slashdot, back towards the conservatives. Similar to how the above poster skewed the juggernauts scrutiny towards causes that are commonly associated with liberals (think feminism, civil rights, freedom, sci-fi, Linux, star trek, natalie portman, non-traditional Video games), in a story that critques the puritanical(American) nature of some of Bush's more conservative(think nobody is allowed to have sex for fun, Microsoft Windows, War in Iraq, Ashcroft covering up a artisitic statue to prevent the showing of the marble boobies, Corporate greed, SCO) policies.
As oposed to most other OpenSource software Gnome isn't build by stacking layers of layers of hacks on top each other
That is exactly how gnome is built, just analyze how pango, gdk, gtk, xlib, gnome, etc and the soon to be intergrated cairo/glitz interact.
Not a troll just an observation.
Even though Homer may appear stupid in the T.V. show, remember he works at a nuclear power plant. They do not allow people without education to work at a nuclear power plant, atleast in the position Homer works, which appears to be a technician. I can't recall a Simpsons episode where they discuss Homer's education or lack of.
Obviously the RIAA has the upper hand here. If they wish to charge more for music Apple's Itunes will comply, and if they don't Napster will win our or Yahoo music or someone else.
Apple's Itunes can't live without the recording industry, the recording industry can live without Itunes and the Ipod.
The Linux kernel has not been quirky for me.Perhaps you should file a bug report, if you haven't already. FreeBSD 5.3 supposedly has stability problems of its own.
Also according to Coverity source code analysis tools, Linux has less bugs detected per lines of code than FreeBSD. Ofcourse, this cannot detect every kind of bug, but it cannot be argued by a logical person that because FreeBSD has more bugs per lines of code, it is actually more stable.
"Lucent's application was being developed for an as-yet-unnamed branch of the U.S. government."
As a government insider, I know that this so-called pipe is actually a staff weapon being developed by Star Gate Command. These new energy based weapons will allow us to counter the Wraith.
The first IQ tests, although flawed by todays standards, when implemented showed women of generally having higher IQ's. Ofcourse this test was summarily nerfed by the male implementors and creators.
Microsoft never decided to base there TCP/IP stack on BSD, rather it was a consulting firm employed to write it. It was replaced in 1994, with a new one written from scratch for Windows NT 3.5.
According to this article the idea of Microsoft still using the BSD TCP/IP stack is patently false.
So maybe it's possible to share, as long as neither species has the technology to obliterate, enslave, or merely cook and eat each other.
Speaking in response to a fictional situation. The Naboo may have a completely different culture than the humans of Earth. Cultures also vary differently on Earth in violence, for example compare the modern USA to the modern UK. They may completely and utterly shun unprevoked violence. I believe the human inhabitants of Naboo did not even have a standing army.
Slashdot Mirror
I said the Church of England is part of the government, because they have seats in the House of Lords; they don't have this because they are elected or appointed, they have this prerogative because they are part of the Church of England.
His rights as a private citizen are irrelevant
His rights are quite relevent, it would be unconstitutional to restrict the President -- like any other citizen -- from talking about his faith. President Bush has not shown any bias against non-Christains, as far as I know.
The Church of England, is part of the government of the United Kingdom, no Church or other religious institution is part of the United States government.
Why does the president mention worship in his political speeches?
Because the President is a politician.
Also the President, as with every citizen of the United States, is protected under the Constitutions so-called Free-Exercise and Freedom of Speech portions in the Bill of Rights, so he has the right to profess his faith in a public setting, even if it appears tacky and insincere.
Even here in god-fearing catholic Ireland, everyone I know thinks that creationism is bunk.
In spite of what the Slashdotters in the United Kingdom tell us; I still think the majority of their population believes in a creator. As it is backed up by statistics not an earge to defend ones nations intellectual superiority over the United States. Why is this modded +5 Informative, its not true and its not informative?
In the United Kingdom, the Church of England, is one of the established State churches, it is part of the very government and even educational system. Church officals hold the right to take certain seats in the House of Lords and there are State ran religious schools and public schools where prayer(not necessarily Christain anymore) is part of a normal. The United States government is not based on any form of religion, nor do we have an established church (I wonder why).
In the United Kingdom the Church and religion is part of the very government. The United Kingdom, being one of the oldest countries has a lot of traditions, and many rights of citizens may not be directly written out, but through jurisprudence over the years, these rights have been extended. Our(American) founding fathers made it very clear that they did not want established State churches or any form of ecclesiastical influnce in the government, hence the very important Establishment Clause.
I actually talked to this girl once in my English class, and they are over rated. In no way are girls better than World of Warcraft.
Even though I agree with your view of having a necessary defense against the government. Having the same rifles the military uses is not effective enough against a modern military force. Iraq which is no where near as expansive as the United States has much more automatic rifles, inspite of them being banned by Saddam failed to stop the U.S. invasion. U.S. Troops invaded and took over a foreign country with little over a couple hundred initial casualties. Many semi-automatic rifles can be turned into fully automatic rifles with a few modifications, this is good because it prevents Joe PostalEmployee from buying and using one against his family/co-workers after things don't go his way. If push comes to shove, and the Constitution is further layed to the wayside by the republicans -- I'm hoping the sympathy of the military for killing fellow Americans in a civil war will prevent much bloodshed. However, this is not much to hope for as the Civil War was the bloodiest war in United States history.
I have nothing against an armed citizenry in a stabalized nation, such as the United States. But in Iraq where Americans are getting killed/wounded by these weapons it is best to confiscate them, and foolish not to.
Ofcourse this post may be portrayed as an artful way to turn the juggernaut of nerdish scrutiny, that is slashdot, back towards the conservatives. Similar to how the above poster skewed the juggernauts scrutiny towards causes that are commonly associated with liberals (think feminism, civil rights, freedom, sci-fi, Linux, star trek, natalie portman, non-traditional Video games), in a story that critques the puritanical(American) nature of some of Bush's more conservative(think nobody is allowed to have sex for fun, Microsoft Windows, War in Iraq, Ashcroft covering up a artisitic statue to prevent the showing of the marble boobies, Corporate greed, SCO) policies.
We can really find out who killed Nicole Brown Simpson.
As oposed to most other OpenSource software Gnome isn't build by stacking layers of layers of hacks on top each other
That is exactly how gnome is built, just analyze how pango, gdk, gtk, xlib, gnome, etc and the soon to be intergrated cairo/glitz interact. Not a troll just an observation.
Even though Homer may appear stupid in the T.V. show, remember he works at a nuclear power plant. They do not allow people without education to work at a nuclear power plant, atleast in the position Homer works, which appears to be a technician. I can't recall a Simpsons episode where they discuss Homer's education or lack of.
Random Conversation
Q: What is your favorite color, you said it was orange?
A: I changed my mind, now its clear.
http://saturn.jpl.nasa.gov/multimedia/images/moons /images/PIA07737-br500.jpg
Iv'e scene this in the toliet bowl after a hard night of drinking and Taco Bell.
Obviously the RIAA has the upper hand here. If they wish to charge more for music Apple's Itunes will comply, and if they don't Napster will win our or Yahoo music or someone else.
Apple's Itunes can't live without the recording industry, the recording industry can live without Itunes and the Ipod.
The Linux kernel has not been quirky for me.Perhaps you should file a bug report, if you haven't already. FreeBSD 5.3 supposedly has stability problems of its own.
1 518217
9 .html
http://www.newsforge.com/article.pl?sid=04/12/14/
Also according to Coverity source code analysis tools, Linux has less bugs detected per lines of code than FreeBSD. Ofcourse, this cannot detect every kind of bug, but it cannot be argued by a logical person that because FreeBSD has more bugs per lines of code, it is actually more stable.
http://www.coverity.com/news/news_06_27_05_story_
Even though Batman Begins (the movie) maybe copyrighted, Thank God Batman.Begins.DVDRip.XviD-DoNE is not.
"Lucent's application was being developed for an as-yet-unnamed branch of the U.S. government." As a government insider, I know that this so-called pipe is actually a staff weapon being developed by Star Gate Command. These new energy based weapons will allow us to counter the Wraith.
They don't put violence in video games because its meaningless, it obviously attracts an audience and increases sales.
The first IQ tests, although flawed by todays standards, when implemented showed women of generally having higher IQ's. Ofcourse this test was summarily nerfed by the male implementors and creators.
If this is painfully obvious, I *duck* in advance.
The queen also eats her I-Pods out of tupper-ware bowls.
Microsoft never decided to base there TCP/IP stack on BSD, rather it was a consulting firm employed to write it. It was replaced in 1994, with a new one written from scratch for Windows NT 3.5.
/ 6/19/05641/7357
According to this article the idea of Microsoft still using the BSD TCP/IP stack is patently false.
http://www.kuro5hin.org/?op=displaystory;sid=2001
So maybe it's possible to share, as long as neither species has the technology to obliterate, enslave, or merely cook and eat each other.
Speaking in response to a fictional situation. The Naboo may have a completely different culture than the humans of Earth. Cultures also vary differently on Earth in violence, for example compare the modern USA to the modern UK. They may completely and utterly shun unprevoked violence. I believe the human inhabitants of Naboo did not even have a standing army.
If it is released under the BSD liscense, it will not encourage terrorists to give back to the community.
Notice how he said shiny new G5, G5's have not been around for years. So his assumption of Mac's shiny obnoxious colors could be correct.
Welcome our brethren Mac users to the unwashed masses of the x86 world.
Your system is not inherently better than my POS E-Machine.