Slashdot Mirror
Kutaragi Thumbs Nose At Other Consoles
Ken Kutaragi thinks very highly of the PS3. So much so, that he is once again badmouthing his competitors in the press. From the article: "This time, Microsoft has stated clearly that it is going after PlayStation. However, they're going not after the PlayStation 3, but the PlayStation 2. They were looking at 2, and that's why [Xbox 360] became like that". And by "that", he probably means crappy. I'm just guessing.
Well, whatever. I'll probably buy one of PS3/360/Revolution, but not until games I'm interested in stop coming out for my PS2 and one of these is out and gets a lineup I'm interested in.
Remember RFC 873!
Summary : company slags rivals.
The actual article is devoid of any real news.
The article is flaimbait, ( it's written in that tone too) to stir up game console discussion before each is released.
That guy goes on about how you can compare the PS3 to the XBOX 360 on specs, and how we should ahve seen the E3 presentation, but...didnt they had to do those with computer hardware cause the real hardware is still not finished?
These people should really shut up and start badmouthing themselves once they actually have some real product to gloat about...
All he's trying to do is delay your decision so insted of 'must have xbox in september' you say 'I'm going to wait for the PS3 to come out too, and then decide which one to get'.
If he can do that, he's done his job...
And by what I've been hearing people say, he's suceeded. If there is a shadow of doubt come xbox's launch in your mind, he's done what he needs to do.
Visit London Scalextric Club
And this:
But what did they get to see? I didn't go to E3, but from what I've read it seems Sony mostly showed pre-rendered footage.His entire sales pitch is to show off pre-rendered movies, on the basis that the real game might look nothing like this but might feature this is a rendered cut scene. And slag off the opposition rather than extolling the (as yet non-existant) qualities of your own (as yet non-existant) hardware.
:)
Christ last time I heard that line of arguments was in a school playground (before they allowed guns
J Allard (and Nintendos equiv) has been much more mature, raising the profile of thier own machines. Selling their machines, not slagging off competitors
CJC
The whole next-gen console war is so overblown. Every company takes themselves so seriously and resorts to insulting each other like a group of jealous seventh grade girls fighting over boy band members. Somehow, I get the feeling that these consoles are not going to revolutionize the living room and provide a fully synergistic entertainment experience like they all claim to be doing. I guess the console market has always been a bit juvenile (recall the Genesis' "blast processing" claims). I guess since I am much older now, I see these squabbles as mere publicity stunts.
The Saturn did horribly in the US.
The Xbox did horribly in Japan.
The Saturn caused Sega to lose a lot of money.
The Xbox caused Microsoft to lose a lot of money.
Sega releases their nextgen console only four years after their previous console.
Microsoft releases their nextgen console only four years after their previous console.
What happens next?
Which, I understand, is kind of their job. But why can't they praise themselves - and provide actual evidence to justify that praise - instead?
What it comes off like is they're running scared. It feels like they've got nothing but pre-rendered stuff and a past track-record of overpromising and underdelivering and now they keep on just saying shit like "ours is sooooooo much better. Reeeeeeealllly better. Soooooooo. Muuuuuuuuch. Beeeeeeeeeter!" and waving their hands around nonsense numbers and specs.
Personally, this amount of hot air and handwaving with *zero* real data to back it up at this point is making me think there are some real problems with the PS3 that they're hoping they can hype over.
Of course, everyone's hyping their stuff - but, in the case of the original XBox, I really feel that they lived up to what they promised and delivered a damn fine system - so (ironic, isn't it?) I guess I trust them a little more than Sony who lied their asses off, didn't live up to what they promised, even if they did deliver a nice console.
Since I can't tell them apart, I treat all ACs as the same person.
Wanna Be Thug 1 - Yo G, you here 'bout Kutaragi? Man, he called those sucka's out and their system!
Wanna Be Thug 2 - Nah, man. Nah.
WBT1 - Yo homes, for real!
WBT2 - Word?
WBT1 - He call a sucka out like dat, his system gotta be for sheezy.
WBT1 - True.
Pigs! Pigs, I say, slopping at the trough that is pop culture! I will buy the system with the gaming soul. The other do can do whatever they please over there.
The cancel button is your friend. Do not hesitate to use it.
It's nice to see a bit of progress in the geek community, a little bit of maturity.
When the PS/2 came out, I tried to explain why the hype was incredibly overblown. I got the equivalent of "troll".
If I tried now to explain why the hype for the PS/3 is overblown, now I'd get "Redundant".
Nobody admitted it at the time. (Haven't seen many admit it now, either...) But I think a lot of people basically got burned. (The PS/2 is nice in a lot of ways. It also sucks ass in some completely inexcusable ways. It's the console world's Pentium 4, designed for high numbers at the cost of real performance.) Looks like there's been some hard learning.
Hopefully, this feeds back to the companies in question... many have said it, but I too am sick of seeing pre-rendered scenes that the PS/1 could have pumped out...
This is actually rather poor flamebait; the poster is really just saying that Ken reminds him of a giggly N fanboi...the implications are much worse for Sony here than they are for Nintendo!
Also, I don't remember hearing anyone ever refer to Mario Sunshine as a "revolutionary" title, but I suppose that is beyond the point.
Curse Nintendo for adding awesome new features to old franchises so that they both keep their core audience, expand to a new audience, and maintain the high level of quality they are known for! Curse them!
They should just join the rest of the pack and release a new Mario title every year, with only minor changes to the characters! Also, they should change the soundtrack from original compositions by greats like Koji Kondo to pop hits by bands like Fountains of Wayne and Good Charlotte. Indeed, that would improve the game ten-fold! They could even re-use the old level geometry and just put new textures on it.
It's about time Nintendo gave up their archaic method of creating entirely new games for each sequel, rather than simply rehashing existing resources and assets and trying to pass that off as a new $50 game that we need to buy.