Simulating Supernovae with Graphics Cards
astroboy writes "As graphics cards get more powerful, Los Alamos and Utah scientists have developed a package, Scout, to use those usually-languishing FLOPs to do simulations, and to visualize of them on the on the run. As an example, they have released
movie of part of the evolution of a core-collapse supernovae"
But they can't bring back Suprnova? Dammit! How am I gonna get my Desperate Housewives?!
From TFA:
Actually, Peter and his buds just got sick of getting scragged in DeathMatch because the video cards in their lab computers are teh SUXX0R.
Now, they have a blank check to get whatever video cards they want.
^_^
____
~ |rip/\/\aster /\/\onkey
Well, you've destroyed those nice scientists computers.
Go to your rooms and I want you to think long and hard about what you've done!
Guaranteed! This comment 100% Anthrax free!
I have seen graphics cards go supernova - just overclock one and you can see it too...FOR REAL, no 3D sim crap,..
boot up the GIMP: filters>light effects>supernova dunno what the big deal is?
Now they've simulated supernovae on their graphics cards, they want to try creating one for real in their web server.
It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
Usually, I think that New Scientist is pretty accurate as far as laymen-science articles go, but they've let a big mistake slip be.
From the article:
"The Scout programming language, developed at Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL) in California, US, lets scientists run complex calculations on a computer's graphics processing unit (GPU) instead of its central processing unit (CPU).
Los Alamos National Labs (LANL) is based in (fittingly) Los Alamos, New Mexico. it is currently operated by the University of California, which has contracted for the ability to manage the lab. This may have caused the confusion.
Also, Lawrence Livermore National Labs (LLNL) is based in Northern California, so that may have caused the confusion as well.
Not a terribly serious concern, but their fact's should be straight. The lab is not in California, it is in New Mexico... Editors: shame on you!
MOTION PICTURE ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA, INC.
:P ...
15503 VENTURA BOULEVARD
ENCINO, CALIFORNIA 91436
UNITED STATES
PHONE: (818) 728-8127
Email: MPAA23@pacbell.net
Anti-Piracy Operations
Date: June 11, 2005
Dear slavemowgli:
The Motion Picture Association of America is authorized to act on behalf of the following copyright owners:
Columbia Pictures Industries, Inc. Disney Enterprises, Inc. Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer Studios Inc. Paramount Pictures Corporation TriStar Pictures, Inc. Twentieth Century Fox Film Corporation United Artists Pictures, Inc. United Artists Corporation Universal City Studios, Inc. Warner Bros., a Division of Time Warner Entertainment Company, L.P.
We have knowledge that you posted a torrent to one of our client's movie (The Scout : http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0111094/) and are demanding that you withdraw this link at once.
Failure to do so will make you loose more then just your modpoints
If I understand correctly graphics cards don't implement IEEE floating point standard. This means that you can expect all kinds of wierd problems with complicated floating point computations ahref=http://www.cs.berkeley.edu/~wkahan/ieee754st atus/754story.htmlhttp://www.cs.berkeley.edu/~wkah an/ieee754status/754story.html>. I wonder how they know they can trust results of their simulations.
Every few years it seems that some variant of using the GPU comes back for scientific computing. I seem to remember in the early 90s a group using the graphics card for the additional memory it could provide. I run quantum-chemistry simulations for a living (basically large quantities of matrix algebra), so anything that could speed up calculations currently taking weeks would be appreciated.
Personally, I'd like to see someone port BLAS (or the ATLAS variant) to a set of standard gpus, so that we could speed up matrix ops. I've been hoping for a more general-purpose solution making it to market, such as the old Celerity strap-on vector unit except for modern IA32/AMD64/PPC, but this may be the better solution.
For those of us who don't have a budget for a Power5 or Cray system, maybe a pair of PCI-e cards running the matrix algebra and FFT routines would be the way to go.
the more accurate the calculations became, the more the concepts tended to vanish into thin air. R. S. Mulliken