Slashdot Mirror


IBM Promoting POWER Systems

A reader writes:"IBM has launched a Open Power Project to increase awareness around its Open Power product line for Linux.. The site includes technical information, forums and provides the ability to tinker w/ Open Power platforms at the University of Augsburg and Peking University. Both Universities are hosting POWER5-based servers and are providing free SSH account access to the Open Source development community. There are rumors of additional Universities to come. They are also hosting special showings of the War of the Worlds in San Francisco and NYC. Looks like there are a couple of hundred pairs of free tickets to each showing on a first come first served basis to those that register."

135 comments

  1. REALLY?!? by Gherald · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Other suggested article titles:

    "Intel promoting Pentium Systems"
    "AMD Promoting Athlon Systems"
    "Microsoft promoting Windows"

    Now,

    "IBM Promoting POWER Systems" ... film at 11 !!

    1. Re:REALLY?!? by MattWhitworth · · Score: 1, Funny

      Conspiracy! They must have some hidden agenda to be promoting this product! IBM is taking over!

    2. Re:REALLY?!? by henrywood · · Score: 4, Informative

      Not quite that obvious. OpenPower refers to a line of servers specifically designed to run Linux (hence the "Open") part. This is a small, very small, part of the IBM lineup (which includes some serious heavy metal).

      A more accurate comparison would be:

      "AMD promoting Athlon64 Systems"

      Even that is not much of a comparison as the Athlon64 range is a much greater percentage of AMD's product than OpenPower servers are of IBM's.

      --
      Something is happening here but you don't know what it is, do you, Mr Jones.
    3. Re:REALLY?!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Jesus! 11 !!? Like we don't get enough leet speak these days...

    4. Re:REALLY?!? by Gherald · · Score: 1

      that is a literal eleven...

    5. Re:REALLY?!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually this is pretty amazing, IBM promoting, improving etc. anything "minor margin" for them amazes me. I work with some of their "vertical market" software which I'm sure they make more money from than anything "Open Power," but they can't even be bothered with giving major portions of it the software equivalent of a lick of paint when they do "updates," and the portions of it I use are of poorer quality than many beta releases of more "mainstream" software after a twelve-year, multi version life cycle.

    6. Re:REALLY?!? by njcoder · · Score: 3, Insightful
      "Not quite that obvious. OpenPower refers to a line of servers specifically designed to run Linux (hence the "Open") part. This is a small, very small, part of the IBM lineup (which includes some serious heavy metal)."

      Hate the name. Running linux doesn't make the architecture "Open". For an affordable power based workstation look here. It runs a few different distros of linux and other os's and more are in the works.

      I don't really agree with all the hype around IBM's open source moves. Seems like a lot of what they are doing is using open source as a way to get salespeople in the door to sell proprietary IBM solutions. That's not necessarily a bad thing depending on how it's done. Look at some of the Apache projects, things like Jetty where IBM was a big supporter until they decided it was good enough to fork it internally for WebSphere Portal. That's not so bad, the license allows it but it's still a bit messed up in my opinion.

      But other things like Derby and Geronimo are different all together. Take a look at the IBM Cloudscape pages. Cloudscape is not open source. It's "open source-based". They released the code as the Apache Derby project, but Cloudscape is not an open source project. The download link says "trials and betas". It may be free now but it has the potential of not being free when IBM senses it can charge for more than just support. Why would IBM release this? It's not because there weren't other open source java based RDBMS's out there. Hypersonic and Mckoi were already quite popular in that space and there are more. The difference is, Cloudscape has been designed to be a stepping stone to DB2. The java rdbms's have a niche market. One segment of which is users that want an easy portable system to develop on with little administrative requirements. These types generally outgrow the capabilities of such database systems and the user needs to migrate. If you're already using Cloudscape, the logical migration path is DB2. Which definately isn't free.

      Also look at their recent acquisition of Gluecode. This gives them the developers of the Geronimo project. It's going to turn into Websphere-Lite. Same type of deal with Cloudscape. Both of these will be at the expense of open source software that is trying to be real open source, not just a carrot on a stick. Hopefully people see this and projects like Jonas and JBoss continue to grow.

      I feel IBM is abusing the phrase "Open Source" in it's marketting where it's not appropriate. Like a couple of days ago when they announced they were moving to a more open source type of development for all their projects. They didn't say they were open sourcing all their projects, just that they will be using open source methodologies within IBM. I guess you could call it the Bazaar in the Cathedral. Yet so many mistakenly took the news to mean that ibm was doing more with open source and releasing more products via open source.

      To me it looks like IBM is turning Open Source into shareware. They have their free versions to tinker around with but when you're ready for the real thing, a non crippled version, you have to pay for it. From Jonathan Schwartz's Weblog we have this quote:

      "Jonas (Red Hat's app server) is just a toy, it's just for the low end" said IBM's exec at the Smith Barney Tech Conference I just attended in NYC.

      A similar message is presented (though a little less harshly) when IBM compares AIX to Linix

      Also look at Eclipse. It's used as an IDE but in many respects it is crippled in that regard, it's real purpose is as a tools platform. To get real productivity out of it you need to purchase plug-ins or upgrade to professional tools based on Eclipse like WebSphere Studio. The Eclipse Foundation is working on a number of open sourc

    7. Re:REALLY?!? by ninboy · · Score: 1

      um , he said POWER not PowerPC , a bit of a difference when it comes to performace and price

    8. Re:REALLY?!? by njcoder · · Score: 1

      Power refers to the Power line of chips which includes PowerPC Power4 and Power5.

  2. How slow will this be? by Jason1729 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Both Universities are hosting POWER5-based servers and are providing free SSH account access to the Open Source development community.

    The servers at my school ran painfully slow with a few dozen people connected through SSH and compiling assignments.

    Imagine the whole Open Source community logged in compiling code.

    1. Re:How slow will this be? by Cinquero · · Score: 1

      Imagine all open-source developers NOT logging in... :-)))

    2. Re:How slow will this be? by The+Woodworker · · Score: 1

      My uni had the same problem, but that's because a few of us went and compiled linux kernels after our assignments were done. The result: a higher point on the belle curve for moi!

      --
      Give a man a fish and he'll eat for a day. Teach him to fish and he'll wipe out the species.
    3. Re:How slow will this be? by Chanc_Gorkon · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Yes but were they Power 5's? I doubt it. The Power5 is VERY fast. We have 3 LPAR's on our system and many processors....one LPAR has 6 dedicated processors and one has 10 processors. Total ram for the system is 106 GB and we split that up between the LPARS.

      --

      Gorkman

    4. Re:How slow will this be? by Octorian · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Interesting, because the AIX-based RS/6000s my school used for remote access (they're still running, though less used than when I was there) were multi-processor 112MHz PowerPC machines (7013-J30, and 7013-J40).

      These handled the load VERY well, and even could handle MULTIPLE remote-X sessions of Pro/Engineer (serious CAD software) across the campus network to the dorms. Maybe hardware or maybe just AIX, but they could certanly handle a beating and keep on ticking responsively.

    5. Re:How slow will this be? by Jahz · · Score: 1

      I have 2 AIX RS/6000's here at work. They are truely beasts, but not really that fast - be it multi user, single user or console - as other competing boxes. I dont run Pro/E on the AIX box, but I do run Dassault's CATIA v5 CAD System. I also run Pro/E on solaris and HPUX.

      In order of speed (for compiling and CAD work):
      1) HP Visualize Workstation C300. Runs 64-bit PA-RISC chip and costs about $500. By far the fastest machine to compile and design on. The HP compiler whines about everything though.
      2) Solaris (32 & 64). We have 2 very old solaris machines running single cpu for 32-bit and dual cpu for 64-bit. The 64-bit bax has 2x 275mhz chips and kicks the crap out of the RS/6000 for compiling. Solaris is also the "friendliest" unix IMO.
      3) Win32. Windows compiles pretty damn fast. The MS compiler also accepts anything you write. It will compile utter garbage without complaining.
      4) AIX. The RS/6000's we have costs in the thousands and take about 2x the time of any other machine to compile on the same code. The IBM compiler will rarely complain.

      My point is that if you think the RS/6000's are fast, you should check out HP's servers. If their sub-$1000 workstations are any indication, the servers will kick butt for their price. If i were buying a UNIX box for personal use, it would be an HP. In fact, its probably they only think i would but from HP.

      --
      There are 10 types of people in the world. Those who understand binary and those who do not.
    6. Re:How slow will this be? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      PA-RISC is dead my friend.

    7. Re:How slow will this be? by Dolda2000 · · Score: 1
      Was your school using 486 Minix servers or something?

      My school is running a fairly old quad-CPU Sun Sparc server with 4 GB of RAM. I don't know the exact clock frequency of it (how do you check that in Solaris?), but it is less than 1 GHz. Most of the time, more than 100 people are logged into it, and there are no speed problems whatsoever.

      I happen to have an account at the University of Augsburg as mentioned in this article, and that thing has 8 1.65 GHz POWER5 CPUs and 8 GBs of RAM. When I compile stuff on it, it just smokes anything I've seen. I never even imagined anything could be that fast. It would hardly surprise me if it could actually handle the load of a large portion of the FOSS community compiling kernels on it.

    8. Re:How slow will this be? by Octorian · · Score: 1

      Of course there are also two parts to "speed" for an interactive multi-user machine. There's response-time, where AIX really shined on those machines, and actual processing power. Even if it runs an intensive task slowly, the simple fact that it has snappy response to an interactive user's input (i.e. UI speed, even if command-line) tasks makes the machine feel a lot faster.

      I also do agree that Solaris is the friendliest, or at least the "cleanest feeling" commercial UNIX. Never messed much with HP-UX boxes, mainly since I've not been around them much and never went out of my way to get any.

    9. Re:How slow will this be? by Jahz · · Score: 1

      I agree that IBM designed AIX for optimal stability and load handling rather than speed. Each additional concurrent task seems to create less slowdown compared to the other platforms. Of course, this makes perfect sense, as RS/6000's were designed as heavy-load webservice & file servers, not desktop workstations.

      I would recommend the HP-UX platform for persons who wanted to get their feet wet in the world of UNIX. They are a fraction of the price of their more well known SUN and IBM counterparts, and offer very competative preformance. HP-UX11, however, is not nearly as friendly as Solaris.

      --
      There are 10 types of people in the world. Those who understand binary and those who do not.
  3. but... by goober1473 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Are IBM withdrawing the OpenPower Line?

  4. You forgot... by krunchyfrog · · Score: 0

    RedHat promoting Fedora

    --
    printf($randomline(sigs.txt) \n "-- "$randomline(authors.txt));
    -- myself
  5. PowerPC by Refrag · · Score: 1, Funny

    It's too bad they aren't promoting PowerPC.

    --
    I have a website. It's about Macs.
    1. Re:PowerPC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      I think IBM shot themselves in the foot by not working with Apple. One of the main reasons why the PowerPC architecture is so popular is because of Apple. Without Apple selling PowerPC machines in the future, it's going to be difficult for Linux users to get these systems, since not all of us have $5000 for a POWER workstation. nor have many heard of Genesi or Terrasoft.

      You kow what I would like to see? If Apple kept supporting PowerPC, but just in Powermacs, that would be great. An even better idea would be if they used proper POWER processors, since those are a superset of PowerPC. Now here's the cool part. To make up for the lack of vector processing goodness due to lack of Altivec, they could offer a Cell processor on a pci-express expansion card, and then just for the hell of it, offer free licenses for AIX with every system. IBM and Apple could wrap the whole thing in a little package and call it The Ultimate Unix/RISC Workstation. They could charge less than one of IBM's workstations, but more than an Intel Powermac. How many of you would buy one of those?

    2. Re:PowerPC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      PowerPC is dead, in the end it turned out Altivec was the inferior technology holding the complete line back and couldn't scale at all in clock frequency. Power don't have Altivec and scale like there is no tomorrow. PowerPC was a bad and embarrasing move for IBM. Now they are back on track.

    3. Re:PowerPC by Trigun · · Score: 2, Informative

      If you've ever worked on an IBM server, then you know why they are popular. The things are built rock solid, redundant everything, monitoring out the whazoo. In short, if it wasn't for the ever increasing processor speeds, then it would be a server that you plan to use for ten years.

      We have an IBM netfinity server, dual p3, and all we've ever had to do to it was replace one drive in our 1/2 TB array. It's an absolute beauty to use, and worth every penny we paid for it.

    4. Re:PowerPC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      None of the POWER mainframe parts have Altivec.

      Care to post the clock rate scaling for that family over the last few years?

      It's not really gone any higher than the rest of the industry.

      ( Yes, I understand that clock rate and performance are not the same thing. However, the clock rates of the 970's with AltiVec are... wait for it... in some case *higher* than the mainframe parts that don't have it!)

      Perhaps IBM will have a breakthrough with POWER6; but if something has been holding down clock speeds on POWER3, 4, and 5... it couldn't have been AltiVec at fault.

    5. Re:PowerPC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      POWER is IBM's umbrella term for POWER4, POWER5, PowerPC

    6. Re:PowerPC by huckda · · Score: 1

      I got a 10 year old machine serving still =)
      nothing wrong with a P133 for a firewall/mail/dhcp server/content filter!

      --
      "Just Smile and Nod." --Huck
  6. promotion by Exter-C · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Realistically I feel that if IBM really want to premote the Power line or processors they will have to have a Apple style lower end system that can be purchased at a reasonable price. That will get people to buy.. Especially if for a time you could run MacOSX Linux, AIX , xBSD and whatever other Operating systems run on the PPC reliably.

    1. Re:promotion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Apple style lower end

      You should have said "Apple style bottom end"

      that can be purchased at a reasonable price

      Only because it's old hardware. You know even Apple are leaving the G4 to rot.

    2. Re:promotion by d1v1d3byz3r0 · · Score: 1

      They will have lower end systems that can be purchased at a reasonable price. They're called the PS3, XBox 360 and Nintendo Revolution. The future of the PC is in the living room. The desktop system as we know it is being squeezed out by gaming consoles and set-top boxes on the low-end and highly parallel servers on the high-end.

    3. Re:promotion by Dolda2000 · · Score: 1
      Realistically I feel that if IBM really want to premote the Power line or processors they will have to have a Apple style lower end system that can be purchased at a reasonable price.
      So what do you think they should do in order to promote it, then?
    4. Re:promotion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Agree, the low-margin, large-volume (well, sort of) segment was footing part of the Power R&D bill. Maybe time to look at Pegasos although, the race is probably already run.

    5. Re:promotion by DF5JT · · Score: 1

      "Realistically I feel that if IBM really want to premote the Power line or processors they will have to have a Apple style lower end system that can be purchased at a reasonable price."

      You mean like a Playstation 3?

    6. Re:promotion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You just ripped that "Future of the PC" bullshit off of G4.

    7. Re:promotion by Eternally+optimistic · · Score: 1

      With this stuff, the sale of their PC manufacturing business, the Apple deal, and the PS3/Cell technical development, it looks like IBM is giving up on the desktop business. Perhaps they believe it will go away. Certainly the profit margins are not very attractive.
      Another article today lists iPods and Blackberries as some of the fastest growing businesses, and lately laptops have overtaken desktops in sales volume. I never really liked being tied to these desktop computers anyway, I want to do my computing at the beach or in the woods.

      --
      What keeps me going is my inertia.
  7. Re:fp! by griasr · · Score: 1

    dunno what to say. i got my account in augsburg

  8. IBM = movie moguls? by panic_smooth · · Score: 1

    am i missing something, or is the jump in this article from IBM to war-t'-worlds a complete non-sequitur? WTF has IBM got to do with this movie or indeed any other?

    --
    1. Re:IBM = movie moguls? by xTown · · Score: 1

      Not IBM, but Linux; according to the website, the SFX are "Linux-based."

      Smells like free advertising to me, too.

    2. Re:IBM = movie moguls? by tomstdenis · · Score: 2, Funny

      synergy.

      They're leveraging a cross-brand multi-market upscale potential to maximize their mindspace and returning revenue streams.

      Tom

      --
      Someday, I'll have a real sig.
    3. Re:IBM = movie moguls? by martalli · · Score: 1

      The web page says the graphics were done with Linux software. That should warm the hearts of the /. crowd.

    4. Re:IBM = movie moguls? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you my boss?

    5. Re:IBM = movie moguls? by tomstdenis · · Score: 2, Funny

      No, but I've been dragged into too many "let's try to make money off tom's public domain code" to know buzzspeak. I usually have self-defense mechanisms [re: shut ears off] when they start in on "getting the market traction going"...

      I've been lucky so far and nobody has caught on that I spent over half my time in meetings mentally undressing the cutest female in the office [which varies with location] or just playing SMB1 in my head... which I can do fairly well at this point...

      Tom

      --
      Someday, I'll have a real sig.
    6. Re:IBM = movie moguls? by youknowmewell · · Score: 1

      Once you can play tetris in your head, then I'll be impressed.

    7. Re:IBM = movie moguls? by tomstdenis · · Score: 1

      with or without the NES music?

      Tom

      --
      Someday, I'll have a real sig.
    8. Re:IBM = movie moguls? by youknowmewell · · Score: 1

      Play it to the Beach Boys.

    9. Re:IBM = movie moguls? by FidelCatsro · · Score: 1

      in Flanders style
      They mark-didilie-arketing their computer-inos ..um didlie

      --
      The only things certain in war are Propaganda and Death. You can never be sure which is which though
    10. Re:IBM = movie moguls? by huckda · · Score: 1

      synergy

      anyone else tired of hearing this marketing buzzword that equates to absolutely NOTHING in the real world of computering?

      --
      "Just Smile and Nod." --Huck
  9. Well Duh. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    "There are rumors of additional Universities to come."


    As the population base expands, the likelihood of more institutes of higher education increases!

    1. Re:Well Duh. by JamesTRexx · · Score: 2, Funny

      Except, you're talking about the USA.

      *ducks*

      --
      home
  10. Tinkering by Donny+Smith · · Score: 2, Insightful

    >provides the ability to tinker w/ Open Power platforms at the University of Augsburg and Peking University.

    I prefer to tinker with my x86 box at home.

    1. Re:Tinkering by ZBytz · · Score: 1

      I'm with you on this one. Wouldn't have anything else. Games don't run as well! lol! And when you can compile a linux kernel in under 15mins...

  11. "Open" Power? by chathamhouse · · Score: 5, Insightful

    You can buy power from... IBM. And it's not cheap. And it doesn't run AIX, only Linux. Sort of. Many applications require some porting love, as per the bounties on http://www.linuxonpower.com/

    I generally like what IBM does, and use their x86 servers, storage, and software.

    But "Open" is pushing it here.

    I'd never be able to justify a recommendation to buy Open Power, that is, unless the sales guy left a flashy car in my parking spot...

    Jonathan Schwartz (Sun CTO) had it right when he noted that that was as silly as them shipping Open Sparc boxes. Mind you, there are Fujitsu SPARC64 chips, and OEM sparc-based system builders.

    Of course, IBM is just loving Solaris, particularly Solaris 10. Some assistance in your Solaris to Linux on Power migration? http://www-128.ibm.com/developerworks/linux/librar y/l-pow-portsolaris/
    (Though it is a well written piece - good quick guide to Linux and Solaris system calls, signals.)

    1. Re:"Open" Power? by ran-o-matic · · Score: 1
      One of the problems is IBM's use of product brands in relation to the POWER architecture.

      The real power of the open power concept is that IBM is opening the design of the entire architecture. Has anyone else ever done that? Nothing on this scale that I know about.

      The article is about a particular part of this open process - allowing developers free access to an OpenPower 710 server. Have you looked at these things? The price is hard to beat for the performance.

      By the way - IBM does sell AIX 5.3 for POWER, just not for the "OpenPower" series of servers.

    2. Re:"Open" Power? by delcielo · · Score: 2, Insightful

      We have 4 of these boxes (2 running single RedHat images, and 2 running LPARS with SuSE, and quite frankly, they rock. So, if your software is supported why not put it on the platform that performs best? And by the way, the cost might seem high if you do the pricing on their website; but nobody buys direct from IBM at retail unless they're a fool. Get with a business partner who will use the discount list to get you a deal.

      You're right that it doesn't run AIX; but that's the whole point of the OpenPower. If you want AIX, buy a p550, it's the OP720 without the Linux-only tweaks.

      In all, for the performance we get, our OP720's are cheaper than comparable Compaq boxes.

      --
      Hot Damn! It's the Soggy Bottom Boys!
    3. Re:"Open" Power? by Diamon · · Score: 1
      You can buy power from... IBM. And it's not cheap.


      Yeha it's not cheap in the same way that Adolph Hitler was not a nice guy. (Yeah I watched The Daily Show last night and I'm *still* going making a Hitler comparison).

      Their low end machine is on sale for a mere $8,881.55
    4. Re:"Open" Power? by raftpeople · · Score: 1

      You are mis-informed. You can run AIX, Linux and OS400 on POWER. p5 system or i5 system. The POWER processors have been powering the renamed RS/6000 (p5) and AS400 (i5) since the early to mid 90's. Linux has been available for years on these boxes.

    5. Re:"Open" Power? by zbik · · Score: 1
      Jonathan Schwartz (Sun CTO) had it right when he noted that that was as silly as them shipping Open Sparc boxes.

      I assume you mean it's silly because IBM is the only source for POWER, so it's not very open. Schwartz wrote as much in his blog entry on OpenPower. His main gripe is that the box doesn't run AIX (that's a bad thing?!). So the real question is, does POWER's awesome integer (read database) performance justify double or treble the hardware cost of an x86 server?

    6. Re:"Open" Power? by leoxx · · Score: 1

      Not sure where you got that number, but the cheapest openpower machine I could find is the base 710, for $3500 with a 1.6Ghz POWER5/32MB L2 cache, 74GB of UltraSCSI and 1GB of RAM. I challenge you to find a Intel, AMD or even PowerPC (Apple G5-type) based box for that price that can match it performance wise.

    7. Re:"Open" Power? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey, somebody mod this guy up!

    8. Re:"Open" Power? by Diamon · · Score: 1

      My bad, I assumed that the price ranges would be Desktop < Workstation < Server. There are no desktops that you can get Linux on, so I went with the Performance 2D Workstation, which it turns out costs *more* than the High-Advanced 3D Workstation and over twice as much as their cheapest server.

    9. Re:"Open" Power? by chathamhouse · · Score: 1

      The article was discussing the Open Power systems, i.e. OpenPower 710, 720. Quoth the IBM literature, they have been optimized for linux, and ship with Linux only. Running AIX and OS400 on them is not supported, and probably prohibited by some evil trinket :)

      The POWER chip is a different story, and yes, is availble in other lines of IBM servers that do run a wider range of OSes.

      Virtualization is your friend, but don't get the sales people started...

  12. price/performance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think they would have more success promoting their hardware, because that is what they are doing, by lowering the prices of their Power systems. The price/performance ratio is not so impressive compared to alternatives. I assume they are targeting at developers with a taste for Linux to promote their stuff and not at the highend market.

  13. If IBM wants to promote Power by Trigun · · Score: 2, Funny

    Maybe they should give away a few hundred or so low-end servers. I wouldn't mind getting one. I'll even pay for the shipping.

    1. Re:If IBM wants to promote Power by Professor_UNIX · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Maybe they should give away a few hundred or so low-end servers. I wouldn't mind getting one. I'll even pay for the shipping.

      That sounds like an excellent way to sell POWER systems. So you would give them a credit card to put a hold on while you're evaluating the system and if you like it you keep it and they charge you... if not you send it back with a modest 10% restocking fee. I like it.

    2. Re:If IBM wants to promote Power by Trigun · · Score: 1

      They could even hire a couple of cheezy actors and put together an infomercial.
      Normally you can expect to pay $10,995 for other high end unix servers, but act now and you can get this IBM POWER 5 server for only three equal payments of $1999.95, and we'll also throw in a copy of Red Hat Linux for Dummies, part of the popular 'For Dummies' series that you most certainly have on your shelves at home already! Use priority code 'POWER5' and get an additional 64 meg USB Dongle ABSOLUTELY FREE!

    3. Re:If IBM wants to promote Power by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They should give damn Steve Jobs a PPC G6 4000 mhz with 32bit, forget benchmark, forget altivec, forget 64 bit give the guy his damn Mhz on low power (watt). Even Apple's boss nods "they promised me 3000 mhz", whatever I got enough flamed as an apple customer by apple USERS.

      And we blamed Dell users for years that they know nothing about CPU as Mhz is the least effecting thing on a properly coded application.

      Well, as Mr. Jobs became a new Intel fan, nothing left to say.

      That would make the promotion already going on for years to continue I mean, I don't care about the mactels or whats going on with mac hardware anymore. I just buy RAM, purchase software from trusted companies (read: Mac only sw houses), keep using my G5 1600 with same performance as a 2500 mhz P4.

      For instance while typing it, I have stuffit 9 re packing a 4 gb archive, to fit less cds. Never did such a thing on Wintel and I am not sure it was Microsoft's fault.

    4. Re:If IBM wants to promote Power by Trigun · · Score: 1

      I think that it would be foolish to not push the 64 bit processor. Going back to 32 bit for the G6 would be worse than admitting failure.
      I think that IBM should try its damnedest to put out a dual processor Power5 system for $1000, you supply the disks. Saturate the market, and offer two-tier service, ie. No service or IBM service. IBM has competed in the clone market, and still came out ahead. It competed in the laptop market and still came out ahead. It can compete in this market and, even if they lose the clone market, they've created a new market for their processors.

      They already have software that runs on it, a fanboi-ish glee club to prostletize for them, and a metric assload of db admins that want an upgrade path other than having to buy all new hardware. Plus, IBM builds their shit rock solid. How many white box servers do you have that have drive, controller, PCI bus, power supply and temperature monitors built in? How many have redundant power supplies? My netfinity server from IBM would keep running short of a fireman's axe method of partitioning it. Let the Dells and Gateways sell the commodity grade hardware, and when they're ready to go to the big iron, IBM builds the best.

    5. Re:If IBM wants to promote Power by goober1473 · · Score: 1

      I'll be in the queue for a p550 entry level system please ;)

    6. Re:If IBM wants to promote Power by hacker · · Score: 1
      "I think that IBM should try its damnedest to put out a dual processor Power5 system for $1000, you supply the disks. Saturate the market, and offer two-tier service, ie. No service or IBM service."

      What if they did? What if you could get a dual G5 PPC machine with say... 512M RAM and a decent disk (I have no idea whats "decent" these days... 160G?), for $1,500 ballpark? Would you buy one? Would your friends?

      I know my wife would kill me if I brought another machine home, but a Dual G5 could replace my ageing G3 for development in a heartbeat... AND it can run OSX, Linux, and BSD natively. I'd love to keep working on porting stuff from my various projects over to something that fast...

      I just checked and Apple's "Developer Transition Kit" costs $999.00, and $500 for your ADC Select membership ($3,500 for Premiere), and you have to give the hardware back in a year. Its a lease, so you can get your apps working in Universal Binary format on Day 1 and not Day 100.

      So let's dream for a moment...

      • Dual G5, $1,500
        • PowerPC-based
        • You get to keep it
        • It runs 3 operating systems
      • Apple Developer Transition Kit, $1,499 or $4,499
        • Intel-based
        • You have to return it in 12 months
        • You have to buy another machine anyway to replace it

      Is it worth it? Maybe we can keep putting pressure on IBM or their partners to get something like this out there... They can't just throw their whole fab into the dumpster out back, can they?

    7. Re:If IBM wants to promote Power by Trigun · · Score: 1

      And if the power architecture became as ubiquitous as the intel architecture?

      Lower prices on motherboards, the ability to go four-way processors, etc. would bring more life into the chip, so they don't have to constantly pump out more clock speeds, etc. Moore's law need not apply. The platform could last the home user ten years, plenty of time to introduce new chips, etc. Things get too slow, throw a couple more processors in. Then more RAM, then faster processors, then max out the RAM. Much easier than chucking out the mobo and processor and RAM each upgrade cycle.
      I don't think that I could honestly tell you that I'd be hampered by a 4-way G5 anytime soon, especially as until recently I was working on a Duron 900.

    8. Re:If IBM wants to promote Power by ran-o-matic · · Score: 1
  14. i dunno by ed__ · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I have doubts about any effort like this working if people can't get their hands on systems of their own. A login with strings attached just isn't all that compelling. With Apple switching to Intel, the prospect of the continued availibility of only-a-little-overpriced, mass-market PPC (ie POWER-ish) systems is fading. Mac systems will be available for some time now, but Apple's Switch casts a pall over the whole affair.

    If IBM wants to push their system they may do well to subsidize cheap PPC systems to this particular niche to gain mindshare, familiarity, and visibility with people who may be in a position to drive iseries server purchases later on.

    I know they have eval systems, does anyone know what the costs are?

    Or maybe it wouldn't help; it'd still be nice.

    1. Re:i dunno by DJProtoss · · Score: 1, Informative

      Sorry to nitpick, but presumably you meant "people who are in a position to drive pseries server purchases - iseries are the intel based boxes...

      --
      "Success is based on knowing how far to go in going too far"
    2. Re:i dunno by ZBytz · · Score: 1

      However, all you PPC fans should look to Amiga in the long run. Yes, they're back with a line of G3 and G4 based systems. They are very pricey, mind.

    3. Re:i dunno by dominux · · Score: 1

      actually iSeries is the box formerly known as AS/400 and it is Power. pSeries was RS6000 and I think is now pretty much identical to the microcode level to the iseries hardware but runs AIX. If you want an intel box you need an xSeries, these were netfinity. If you want a laptop then you will be getting a thinkpad from Lenovo. Funnily enough you can get a Thinkpad iseries or xseries but that has nothing to do with AS/400 or Netfinity, just a left hand vs right hand cockup. Someone said recently on the subject of IBM's left hand not talking to the right that the problem is that IBM is not just a two handed creature where left and right are the only options, think of it more like several thousand hands and feet, with most of the feet in the mouth and most of the fingers being trod on by the remaining feet.

    4. Re:i dunno by asdfghjklqwertyuiop · · Score: 1

      iseries are the intel based boxes


      No, iSeries is the former AS/400.

    5. Re:i dunno by chez69 · · Score: 1

      AIX does not run on iseries, OS/400 does.

      --
      PHP is the solution of choice for relaying mysql errors to web users.
    6. Re:i dunno by ed__ · · Score: 1

      yay, i turned out to be right this time (see other replies). that said, you are correct in believing i have no idea what i'm talking about.

    7. Re:i dunno by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, AIX does not run on iseries.

      (Hint: read what he actually wrote.)

    8. Re:i dunno by Seehund · · Score: 1

      However, all you PPC fans should look to Amiga in the long run. Yes, they're back with a line of G3 and G4 based systems.

      No, they aren't.

      The dysfunctional hardware that's been sporadically hawked for several years now to a closed off "Amiga market" as so called "AmigaOnes" for $800-900 a piece are relabelled $500 Teron series motherboards from Mai Logic. Only some 700 suckers bit the bait. Also, they are only sold in G3 configs, not G4. It is unclear if Mai Logic are still alive, but what is clear is that they after >3 years of delays still haven't managed to make a successor to their flawed "Compaq PC of ca. 1998"-type ArticiaS northbridge chip.

      The Amiga-as-a-computer has been dead for a decade is not planned to be revived, though AmigaOS lived on, but now the latest incarnation of the dotcom company misleadingly known as "Amiga, Inc" are apparently doing their best to kill off AmigaOS 4. This is done by pretending that "Amigas" still exist or are needed, so a pseudo-market for other companies' hardware was invented and cut off from the rest of the world and the OS will only be sold bundled with such 3rd party hardware from dealers who have bought a licence from AInc.

      Of course, the only vendor who has managed to acquire such a licence is Eyetech (the company that's currently scamming fanatics with the fatally flawed and severely overpriced "AmigaOnes"), who also provided "consulting" to help the semi-dormant and disinterested AInc invent this scheme.

      AmigaOS, as well as "all you PPC fans", would be better off looking 2nd hand Macs which even after 2006 will still be a bazillion orders of magnitude larger, better, healthier and cheaper product and market than what's offered under the label "AmigaOne". The Pegasos2 G4 is nice too, but a bit expensive compared to eg. the Mac Mini.
      Really, anything is better than an "AmigaOne" or the con artists who are trying to distribute them.

      See my sig and my UID homepage.

      --
      Help savingAmigaOS and a free PowerPC market
  15. Stop it! by JamesTRexx · · Score: 1

    You're hurting my head! *stuffs my ears with pillows*

    --
    home
  16. I *was* tinkering with my Mac Mini by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    on some open source stuff I have that has hardware dependencies, but then Apple switched basically because IBM doesn't really care about PPC on the low end. So like I should care about PPC anymore? I don't think so.

  17. What does "Open" mean? by argent · · Score: 2, Funny

    Historically, putting "Open" in a product name or service has been a useful warning sign, similar to "Honest" on a used card dealer's lot.

    For example, "OpenVMS", "MVS Open Edition", "Open Desktop" or "Open Server", ...

    Unfortunately this is no longer a reliable guide, as some open systems and open source organizations have muddied the waters by using it in the previous (and, for a time, obsolete) sense.

    1. Re:What does "Open" mean? by speculatrix · · Score: 1
      another example, openTV - whose technology is used in many satellite tv receiver boxes.

      This company in Israel were taken to task for abusing the GPL - they used the GNU tool chain which they modified to produce a compiler/linker for their STBs: JFGI.

  18. Not just a promotion of IBM hardware... by CatsupBoy · · Score: 2, Insightful

    But an attempt to get some applications ported to Linux for the power series.

    I've been evaluating Linux at my present employment, and what was lacking most in the IBM solution was available software for the POWER series Linux OS.

    At the moment, many large enterprise, infrastructer applications have been ported to linux for Intel (most even come with RedHat and SuSE packages), but of the 5 applications we require, only TSM backup was offered for Linux on power arch. This list includes BMC, EMC, and BindView.

    IBM is in a pretty good position to market Linux, because they support both RedHat and SuSE on the very same hardware that AIX runs on, and you can use some of the advanced features like dynamic LPAR and virtulization.

    But I think in the long run, its just too much trouble for companies to port to yet another linux distribution.

  19. too little too late? by CowbertPrime · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Clock for clock, for pure computational demands, very little beats 64bit POWER architecture with real vector instructions. I'd definitely like to see IBM sell something like an apple xserve for us relatively poor scientists who want POWER for doing lots of raw number crunching: fft and molecular dynamics in particular.

    1. Re:too little too late? by henrywood · · Score: 2, Informative

      An OpenPower 710 will cost you about $3500 (you might even be able to find it cheaper) as opposed to $3000 for a comparable X Server. It's not that big a difference! I'd pay an extra $500 for the openness and reliability of IBM kit. (No - I don't work for IBM! I'm just a satisfied customer.)

      --
      Something is happening here but you don't know what it is, do you, Mr Jones.
    2. Re:too little too late? by signingis · · Score: 1

      That would be the OpenPOWER 710 or 720. They're more accessible for less-funded departments than a pSeries. They only run Linux though.

      --

      I prefer a void in conversation to a vacuous one.
    3. Re:too little too late? by mrjatsun · · Score: 1

      I agree w/ parent. I also think this is more of a reaction to apple dropping them than anything else...

    4. Re:too little too late? by chez69 · · Score: 1

      The power 5 kit is so much better then an xserve. The chips are faster, it supports more memory, the OS is fully 64 bit, etc...

      I'm not an IBM employee, I just use kick ass power 5 based systems at work.

      --
      PHP is the solution of choice for relaying mysql errors to web users.
  20. PowerPC to the people by rbanffy · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Without entry-level, inexpensive and interesting (i.e. "Xenon-based" or dual-core FreeScale G4s), PPC Linux will starve to death.

    Nobody will pay more than what a entry-level x86 costs for an entry-level PPC system.

    IBM and FreeScale (the current most affected by Apple's switch) should think about getting simple Linux based PPC desktops at rock-bottom prices in the hands of developers, even if it means selling them at a loss.

    When developers lose interest in a platform, it is doomed.

    1. Re:PowerPC to the people by bhima · · Score: 1

      But if IBM wasn't that interested Apple's business why would they be interested in this?

      --
      Nothing in the world is more dangerous than sincere ignorance and conscientious stupidity.
    2. Re:PowerPC to the people by Lucractius · · Score: 1

      You mean something like this

      http://www.pegasosppc.com/products.php

      Theyve been around for some time it seems.

      --
      XML - A clever joke would be here if /. didn't mangle tag brackets.
    3. Re:PowerPC to the people by chez69 · · Score: 1

      because they make a hell of a lot more money selling power 5 systems then selling G5 chips to apple.

      --
      PHP is the solution of choice for relaying mysql errors to web users.
    4. Re:PowerPC to the people by henrywood · · Score: 1

      I think that you're falling into the trap of looking at the PowerPC chip as an alternative to x86- or 68000-class chips. But have a look at the diversity of systems that use these IBM chips. It's not just PCs or low-level servers but goes all the way through the IBM range. We're talking about really serious heavy metal here.

      Losing Apple's custom is just a fleabite and won't have any appreciable effect of the development of PPC applications, Linux or other. We're not talking Dell or Apple here, it's a whole different ballgame.

      --
      Something is happening here but you don't know what it is, do you, Mr Jones.
    5. Re:PowerPC to the people by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      IBM makes around 200000-300000 POWER4/5 chips a year. They make around 3 million PowerPC chips for which Apple buys 99% of (IBM do make a PowerPC blade product but that does not sell that good), so loosing Apple is a real drop in volume for the PowerPC architecture outside the embedded space.

    6. Re:PowerPC to the people by rbanffy · · Score: 1

      The ones I looked at are still quite a bit more expensive than a Mac Mini.

    7. Re:PowerPC to the people by henrywood · · Score: 1

      If IBM were just a chip manufacturer I'd agree with you. But that's not how they make their money.

      --
      Something is happening here but you don't know what it is, do you, Mr Jones.
    8. Re:PowerPC to the people by browncs · · Score: 1

      Tough to reconcile those numbers with the fact that Apple revenues were a single digit percentage or IBM's OEM microelectronics revenue. Power architecture and IBM chips are imbedded in each of the new gaming platforms (Sony, Nintendo, Microsoft).

    9. Re:PowerPC to the people by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Given the profile of the console market and that most consoles are sold at a loss, I'd bet IBM is earning nothing but publicity on the cell deal. Embedded is probably moore profitable, but that's Motorola world today.

      Apples defection severely eroded the Power world.

    10. Re:PowerPC to the people by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They're not a charity either; they drop markets that aren't profitable and that could be PPC today. Without PPC, they're down a significant number of Power developers, and that leaves Power in a bad position compared to, say, SPARC.

      IBM will survive, that's not being questioned, but will Power?

      (Don't get me wrong, I think Power/PPC is a better design than both sparc and x86 et al, but chasing apple away was a bad career move.)

    11. Re:PowerPC to the people by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "If IBM were just a chip manufacturer I'd agree with you. But that's not how they make their money. "

      What does that have to do with what I said ?

    12. Re:PowerPC to the people by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, and I called the gaming platforms embedded in this case. IBM need that kind of volume the the console market have, although the profit is much lower.

      IBM need about a month to produce all the chips Apple need, and also about a month to produce the POWER4/5 chips. The POWER4/5 chips are much more difficult to manufacture, so even though they are in smaller volume it takes the same times as the 3 million Apple PowerPC chips.

    13. Re:PowerPC to the people by henrywood · · Score: 1

      Forgive me if I misunderstood you, but I thought you were arguing that the loss of the Apple sales will affect the development of the Power chip and sytems based on it. It won't because IBM's big money spinners are based upon it.

      If IBM were just a chip manufacturer the loss of those sales might affect the whole future of the chip. But becasue they use it in their mid- and top-range machines it's not going to bother them at all. Selling one big iSeries or pSeries is worth a wealth of mini-Macs.

      If that's not what you meant perhaps you could elaborate.

      --
      Something is happening here but you don't know what it is, do you, Mr Jones.
    14. Re:PowerPC to the people by henrywood · · Score: 1

      Power is profitable without Apple. It's an inherent component of IBMs big machines. I don't see the loss of the Apple contract affecting it's profitibility in any substantial way.

      --
      Something is happening here but you don't know what it is, do you, Mr Jones.
    15. Re:PowerPC to the people by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OK, I agree with you then, but sadly, the Apple decision does not help PowerPC in the general purpose computing space.

    16. Re:PowerPC to the people by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 1

      Slower than a Mac mini 1Ghz G4 and 800Mhz G3 options, at nearly twice the price. I am curious what markets need this sort of thing. For better or worse, x86 is dominating or heavily intruding on most markets. For most embedded use, x86 systems seem to generally have the least expensive total system cost. How the next game consoles beat this, I'm not sure, other than sheer volume.

    17. Re:PowerPC to the people by Lucractius · · Score: 1

      Yes ill admit those boxes do suck lol.

      Realy i think its going to come down to a simple thing. $

      Designing hardware is expensive work.

      Fortunatly there are effrots to make this change.

      Some enterprising folks are designing Open Hardware along similar lines as the Sparc standard (though cheaper and more flexible)

      So perhaps if we start seeing some "BSD Hardware Licence" type thing. Where you can get a CPU made from whoever sells them. and theres a mounting board that connects to the memory board, southbridge and controler board that hooks up to the adapter slot board, etc.

      Well start seeing some new Non x86 dominance.

      but i guess such a modular geeks playtoy kinda dream wouldnt ever be ecconomicaly viable.

      Oh and i said BSD licence for a reason.

      Companies Love the BSD licence. So they can charge for it. And it still remains available as a free design for anyone to use or improve upon.

      --
      XML - A clever joke would be here if /. didn't mangle tag brackets.
  21. Boycott yankdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Biased xenophobic american idiots

  22. They lost their ad revenue by screwing apple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If they'd have delivered what they said they would, Apple would be the best example of Power to the People.

  23. I've got one here by IGnatius+T+Foobar · · Score: 4, Interesting

    We've got an OpenPOWER 720 in our data center as part of IBM's push to get everyone to try it out, and let me tell you, this architecture is fast. Blazingly fast. From the zippy CPU's to the efficient bus design, it just crunches through the most demanding data tasks effortlessly.

    There are some caveats, though. One is that it does run hot. I wouldn't recommend keeping this type of machine running anywhere other than an air conditioned data center. You can feel the hot air blasting out the front of the chassis. The other thing is that because it's designed for virtualization, getting it booted up can be somewhat cumbersome. It actually requires a separate computer (an ordinary PC, as shipped) to run the software that configures partitions and manages the boot process.

    Other than that, though, this is a great way to get a smaller version of what "big iron" can deliver, at a decent price.

    --
    Tired of FB/Google censorship? Visit UNCENSORED!
    1. Re:I've got one here by Bongzilla · · Score: 0

      It actually requires a separate computer (an ordinary PC, as shipped) to run the software that configures partitions and manages the boot process.

      Holy shit that's awesome. That is straight out of a science fiction flick. Only a totally awesome computer would get an assistant computer.

      --

      ;///////////////////////////////////////////////// /
    2. Re:I've got one here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Holy shit that's awesome. That is straight out of a science fiction flick. Only a totally awesome computer would get an assistant computer.

      Try looking at a recent larger zSeries if you think that's cool. It has a block of 12+ CPUs in a single package, a built in refrigerator to keep them cool, and DUAL integrated ThinkPad laptops for system management tasks.

  24. IBM doesn't have a good promoting record by Deviant · · Score: 1

    Given the wonderful job IBM has done promoting OS/2 and promoting Lotus SmartSuite and all of the other myriad products that have failed due to poor marketing and execution on their part I am not holding my breath that this boutique architecture will ever make it out of the outrageously expensive corportate data center. If you are going to be running Linux anyway I can't see that it is worth the price increase and the trouble to do it on Power. How many more Opteron boxes can you buy for the same money? How much easier of a time will you have getting it working and running the apps that you want?

    1. Re:IBM doesn't have a good promoting record by henrywood · · Score: 1

      Makes you wonder how the survive, doesn't it?

      --
      Something is happening here but you don't know what it is, do you, Mr Jones.
    2. Re:IBM doesn't have a good promoting record by cyberspittle · · Score: 0

      IBM = Idiots Build Machines?

  25. We evaluated linux on the p720 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    The 720 is tweaked so it will not run AS/400 or AIX, but only linux. We chose SUSE because RedHat wanted to charge per LPAR. We found that no matter what we tried, after running an online update, we had an unbootable system. We had the IBM techs in for a week and after loading the system several times and updating it they continued to get the same results.

    We cancelled our order and shipped back the eval units. We have no problems with Dell (after adding intel nics because the broadcom like to die).

  26. IBM prices by charlieo88 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    If IBM was really serious about this, they'd make a system that you could buy for a couple hundred bucks.

    I'd buy a PowerPC motherboard that had standard ATX power connections, IDE/SATA, maybe some PCI slots, maybe SMP. But I'm not going to spend >$3k thank you very much. I, and I'm sure others, would love to tinker with PowerPC chips if it wasn't cheaper to buy a Mac instead.

    1. Re:IBM prices by metamatic · · Score: 1
      I, and I'm sure others, would love to tinker with PowerPC chips if it wasn't cheaper to buy a Mac instead.

      Ah, but IBM has solved that problem, by forcing Apple to eliminate those pesky low-priced PowerPC systems...

      --
      GCHQ Quantum Insert installed. If only our tongues were made of glass, how much more careful we would be when we speak
    2. Re:IBM prices by leoxx · · Score: 1
      I'd buy a PowerPC motherboard that had standard ATX power connections, IDE/SATA, maybe some PCI slots, maybe SMP.


      Here you go.

    3. Re:IBM prices by janic · · Score: 1

      how about this one:
      Dual PPC 970

  27. SCO by Marc2k · · Score: 1

    Don't forget OpenWare!

    --
    --- What
    1. Re:SCO by argent · · Score: 1

      I think you're conflating Open Desktop or Open Server with UNIXware?

  28. New Power 5s by JhohannaVH · · Score: 1

    I can't wait... we are getting on for Development, and they are going to let me work with IBM PS's to install it. I really dig the technology, and I think the Virtual IO system that they have, along with some of the newer stuff, like the Virtual Storage Controller (which is fscking amazing!!!). We'll see how it goes.
    What *I* don't know yet, is if we are going to go Linux or AIX with that platform. We're just kicking the ideas around the next couple of weeks. :) Jho

    --
    Sorry man... the Internet pooped on me.
  29. Big Blue States by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

    Am I glad that all the subsidies I pay to support IBM in America are funding the tech advantages they're offering students in China. How about IBM sends free POWER devkits to every flagship state college in America?

    --

    --
    make install -not war

  30. Re:fp! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    me too :-)

  31. Francesca Fiore... by Burz · · Score: 1

    Q: Why do you do it??

    A: The P-P-P-Power!

  32. Strategy by hotsauce · · Score: 1

    You should be glad. This is a trojan horse. Open POWER is dead, it's all a clever trick to get the Chinese to waste time on an amazing yet dead-in-the-water technology.

    Chalk one up for India.

    Oh, I'm sorry, did you want something good to happen to the US?

  33. Damn Right! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The cheapest PowerPC workstation from IBM comes at more than 5000 USD. That's an insane amount of money to pay for a computer.

    --Coder

  34. Dont bother with the free movie tickets offer by asdf987 · · Score: 1

    Its fake. Dont bother going to NYC theater or asking around for the kickoff event. Looks like its not an offer at all. If you go to theater and buy tickets yourself, what the hell is the offer for ?