Slashdot Mirror


Wikimedia and KDE Cooperation Announced

eean writes "As reported by KDE Dot News, today Jimmy Wales, chairman of the Wikimedia Foundation, announced the beginning of a cooperation between Wikimedia and the KDE project at LinuxTag in Karlsruhe, Germany. As the first applications, like the media player amaroK, start to integrate Wikipedia content the idea is to create a webservice API to access the information from Wikimedia projects such as Wikipedia or Wiktionary."

36 of 174 comments (clear)

  1. I swear to God... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    they better not name it Kikipedia, or Wikide.

    1. Re:I swear to God... by JonLatane · · Score: 3, Interesting

      What about "KWikipedia." That's kind of catchy, actually.

    2. Re:I swear to God... by Illissius · · Score: 2, Informative

      It's called Knowledge.

      --
      Work is punishment for failing to procrastinate effectively.
    3. Re:I swear to God... by buraianto · · Score: 3, Funny

      They'll name it Kwikipedia. And when you need to look something up on the internet, it will be known as "getting a kwiki".

  2. Playing Tag? by Gertlex · · Score: 4, Funny

    The plan WAS to get all these linux penguins playing tag, but they never quite got started. The rules consulted on Wikipedia.org were changed from moment to moment.

  3. Thank God by captnitro · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Finally! This is something I've been preaching for a long time.

    While I understand it isn't (directly) the goal of open-source to compete with Company, Inc., the next generation of computing tools is going to be heavily service-oriented. That is to say: open-source has thus far concentrated on making software "products" -- applications, utilities, libraries, and so on. In a service-oriented community, though, open content is just as important as the tools that use it.

    Furthermore, I like to see when open-source products doing a little more -- wait for it -- synergy. (Shoot me.) Thus far, open projects have, apart from sharing code and libraries, stayed mostly to themselves. But partnerships like this are absolutely beneficial to creating a cohesive, seamless user experience. Via services, you create an entire open "platform" that isn't just the tools, but the content that backs it up. It also creates an entirely new market for companies to support open-source software.

  4. Trillian does this. by krgallagher · · Score: 3, Informative

    I use Trillian as an IM client and it does something similar to this. I get underlined links with more information from Wikimedia if words in the message match an existing wiki topic. I think it is pretty cool.

    --

    Insert Generic Sig Here:

    1. Re:Trillian does this. by pherthyl · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I'm not entirely convinved of the usefulness of this feature.. I tried it once and thought it was ultimately useless. Much better would be just to have a context menu with a "Look up in Wikipedia" entry for any word.

      How often do you really need to look up a word in an IM conversation? All this feature does is place useless load on the wikipedia servers because people are bored and are mousing over the links to look at definitions for mundane words.

  5. Great! by TheStick · · Score: 3, Funny
    Let's just hope they won't add integrated Wikipedia to KTeaTime

    "Earl Grey tea is a black tea blend, which gets a distinctive flavour and aroma from bergamot oil..."

    1. Re:Great! by m50d · · Score: 3, Funny

      Why not? I've got about six boxes of tea in my cupboard from various sources with little idea what each is like without trying them. It'd be nice to have my tray applet suggest what might be suitable.

      --
      I am trolling
    2. Re:Great! by GweeDo · · Score: 3, Funny

      You are new to Wikipedia aren't you? The entry should look something more like this:
      "Earl Grey tea is a black tea ..."
      Hope this helps you fit in more.

  6. This could be really useful... by Mad_Rain · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I've looked at a bunch of different ways of playing and organizing my small mp3 collection (is 20GB still small?). Amarok has been one of my favorite aps when I'm using my linux desktop. When I've set up my file server to stream mp3s over the web to my office computer (running Windows), I've used Jinzora.

    Now, both of these programs use a MySQL database backend to help organize and catagorize mp3s, and use id3 tag information. I think it'd be an absolute joy to have them share the same data, instead of using two redundant databases. Perhaps as this project matures, we could see this become a standardized format for multiple projects to use, so the information can be shared and edited more easily.

    --
    "What do you think?" "I think 'What, do you think?!'"
  7. Will this affect our Leaders at Google? by HaFBaKeD · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It seems this kind of collaboration, in a lot of ways, will allow people to bypass having to launch a browser and use our favorite search engine to find the information they are looking for. Granted, its only from one resource right now, but for the masses, in most cases, they'd probably be pretty happy with that. Cutting down on the time spent trying to find relevant google results alone is a huge bonus, as many out there have trouble properly narrowing down their searches to begin with.

    --
    "A war over religion is like fighting over who has the best imaginary friend."
    1. Re:Will this affect our Leaders at Google? by m50d · · Score: 3, Funny

      I'm sure KDE's competitors at Gnome will rush to collaborate with Google in response, given how their name starts

      --
      I am trolling
    2. Re:Will this affect our Leaders at Google? by halltk1983 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Would it be Gnoogle or Goome? I'm partial to Gnoogle myself... it sounds cuddly.

      --
      Watch for Penguins, they eat Apples and throw rocks at Windows.
  8. Re:strange alliances by Frymaster · · Score: 3, Interesting
    what has KDE anything to do with Wikipedia?

    well, wiki is a big bag of web-accessible content that could fit nicely into desktop applications... personally i would like to be listening to a cd on my computer, say "here come the warm jets" by brian eno, and be able to pull up a short bio on mr. eno, his complete discography, the lyrics to the current song, a list of reviews of the album and artist and the cover art for the album... all without having to fire up my web browser and performing a bunch of search-n-clicks.

  9. A very good thing by m50d · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Wikipedia in your media player is one of the things you don't notice you were missing until you have it, after which it's indispensible. I hope other projects start to take advantage of the bindings, hopefully not just within KDE but elsewhere as well. This should benefit everyone.

    --
    I am trolling
  10. Re:strange alliances by Curtman · · Score: 2, Informative

    "/me gets started on the Rhythmbox patches."

    Then quickly discovers it already does this using Allmusic

  11. Re:Why Amarock and not Konqueror or word processin by amide_one · · Score: 4, Informative

    > Wouldn't it be a better use of resources to incorporate this into a browser or word processor?

    AbiWord has already done for some time.

    > I already know who sang the song - they're my legal copies

    Yes, but this isn't about looking up the song somehow to see who sang it (try MusicBrainz for that). It's about looking up the band to read about their history or other news. (Wikipedia does have articles on a surprising number of bands.) And nothing says that amaroK (not Amarock) would insist on popping up a Konqueror window with the results from every new song -- lots of features can be disabled as a preference, or not even compiled in in the first place. (In the same way that you'd only want your word processor to do this with words you highlight instead of *every* word you type.)

    And of course there's already a list of other KDE stuff that could integrate this to benefit from information that's already been collected, instead of duplicating information on stars and chemical elements and countries (for instance).

    So it's *already* been incorporated into a browser *and* word processor (there's a search plugin for Firefox); why not add it to amaroK and Kalzium and KStars and.... ?

  12. Re:Why Amarock and not Konqueror or word processin by Lemming+Mark · · Score: 3, Informative

    /me compiled the Amarok beta earlier today.

    It doesn't do the Wikipedia lookup unless you ask it to - normal operation is the same as ever. It works very nicely :-)

  13. Re:strange alliances by Reverend528 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I actually started building a wiki for a CS class with this goal in mind. Rather than a traditional HTML wiki, it was built around RDF data. So not only was it able to dump the data in a machine-readable format, it also had a built-in RDQL query engine that worked over http.

    To conform to the data model, I had to impose restrictions on the input, but the final product is a lot more reliable than screen-scraping HTML, which is something I hope the kde/wikipedia people avoid in this project.

  14. right idea, wrong example by X_Bones · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Who needs media player to interact with an encyclopedia? I already know who sings the songs I listen to. I've already bookmarked the band's web site, which has more photos and lyrics than Wikipedia could collect. I've seen the IMDB entry on the movie I'm watching, or I have the box it came in. What's the point?

    Now, something like an e-book reader tied to a service like Wiktionary would be far more useful. I think a lot more people would take advantage of something like this (particularly those with handleld wireless devices).

    1. Re:right idea, wrong example by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 2, Insightful
      I've already bookmarked the band's web site, which has more photos and lyrics than Wikipedia could collect.
      Yes, in a 800x600 Flash applet, which loads in a popup window. Thankyouverymuchbutnothanks.
  15. Microsoft to do the same with Encarta? by CyricZ · · Score: 2, Informative

    I suppose that Microsoft will copy this idea by linking their desktop services with Encarta.

    Indeed, I would be very hesistant to trust their results. While Wikipedia's veracity has often been questioned, at least it is a public effort with the input of hundreds of thousands of people. Encarta, on the other hand, is a corporate effort without the public involvement. The risk of corporate nogoodery is far greater.

    --
    Cyric Zndovzny at your service.
  16. WebServices -- NOT limited to KDE. by roard · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Well, if they create webservices for wikipedia/wiktionary, everybody will be able to use it, not just KDE ... I don't see what will prevent me to write a GNUstep client for example :-)

  17. Bandwidth by slapout · · Score: 2, Insightful

    So, on one hand Wikipedia needs more bandwidth ( http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=05/02/10/235520 2 )...

    And on the other, they are doing things like this that will increase the load on their servers...

    (Then again, I never understood why people mow their lawns and then water them. :-)

    --
    Coder's Stone: The programming language quick ref for iPad
  18. More information and photos by BReflection · · Score: 2, Informative
    --
    python -c "x='python -c %sx=%s; print x%%(chr(34),repr(x),chr(34))%s'; print x%(chr(34),repr(x),chr(34))"
  19. Re:Good Idea by Yankel · · Score: 3, Funny

    Rumour has it that Linus is going to dump Git and use Wikipedia to host the kernel code.

    Who needs a moderator?

    --
    --- Dan
  20. Re:Amarok? by ThinkTiM · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Yeah, browsers are getting old. What we need is a program that you can open, and look at information from a variety of differented sources - perhaps they should even have some way of maintaining lists of your favourite sources. And they should invent somekind of markup language so that the information soures can structure their content so that the program knows how to present it. oh wait....

  21. Shoulda done it with GNOME by foreverdisillusioned · · Score: 2, Funny

    I can't believe no one has pointed out the blindingly obvious GNOME counterpart--Gikipedia. "Geeky-pedia."

    The marketing practically writes itself.

  22. Wikipedia Rocks by Etriaph · · Score: 2, Interesting
    I think this is an awesome idea as a KDE user. I love using Wikipedia, and have often spent hours just reading through inane trivia I've found there. Integrating this with a desktop application is a smart idea, and I honestly can't believe someone hasn't thought about it before.

    I hope GNOME and the folks in Redmond follow this lead and create a Wikipedia desktop app to interact with this webservice.

    --
    "It's here, but no one wants it." - The Sugar Speaker
  23. Re:Speaking of amarok by eean · · Score: 3, Informative

    They were removed just to give a more clean interface. There's an icon to open the page in a web browser if you want to edit. amaroK is a media player, we wanted to avoid turning it into a full-blown web browser. :)

  24. Nevermind tight integration with applications.... by JaF893 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I want to be able to download Wikipedia. Obviously this would rape the Wikipedia servers but they could do a monthly release via bit torrent. I think this would be really useful and they could even sell copies of it on DVD.

  25. Uniting it with HELP by mnmn · · Score: 3, Interesting

    What if KDE's own manuals and help system were rsynced with its original data in wikipedia? What if all manuals were rsynced from wikis?

    We could type 'man ls' and get the latest page with comments and all.

    Sure beats submitting manpage patches to developers.

    Even better, like in wikipedia, you'd click on a word in a manual page, and you'd get the man page of that manual and all related pages...

    Now combine that with the google search engine.

    --
    "Give orange me give eat orange me eat orange give me eat orange give me you." -Nim Chimpsky
  26. Re:amarok-1.3.1-beta1 compilation fails by WWWWolf · · Score: 2, Insightful

    For the sake of everything that is good and holy, let aRts die already. Nuke it. Nuke it without mercy. Let no bit stand atop another. Walk now amongst the ruins of the evil hack as the new Scourge of God. Drive now the thrice-cursed band-aid solutions to cheap hardware problems from our sight, nay, from the sights of every man, woman and child in this world.

    And compile --without-arts or whatever it's called in amaroK.

    Or just do what everyone else does and wait for 1.3 final, but even there, disabling aRts is definitely the way to go. GStreamer all the way! =)

  27. Re:Speaking of amarok by cmbofh · · Score: 2, Funny

    You're mean. You're destroying people's prejudice that KDE can only add features and bloat.

    Good decision, BTW.