Inside Hardware Design - Competing Against the iPod
ihatewinXP writes "FastCompany.com has a behind the scenes article detailing Rio's (and others) attempts to differentiate hardware and compete in the digital music market against the iPod juggernaught. From the article: "We decided that we had to be radically different from Apple. Where Apple was sort of the ivory tower, we were going to be the dark rebel. Where Apple was very geometric, we were going to be smooth and curvy. Apple was so enamored with absolute pure, minimalist design that some designers may argue that ergonomics were compromised.""
Apple was so enamored with absolute pure, minimalist design that some designers may argue that ergonomics were compromised.
I'm sure the head of the iPod department will really give two shits about ergonomics when he goes for his daily swim in his pool filled with crisp $100 bills...
Okay guys, we're waiting. Get busy already.
Obliteracy: Words with explosions
We decided that we had to be radically different from Apple.
Because, hey, iPods aren't really selling that well.
Where Apple was sort of the ivory tower, we were going to be the dark rebel.
Why would anyone say those so soon after everyone saw Gandalf defeat Sauron?
Im just waiting for apples latest invetntion... iSophagus http://www.sluggy.com/daily.php?date=050622
I love to slaughter the english language.
Don't be a player hater... it doesn't suit you. :x
- Toby
I can pimp up apple iPod with all sort of bling-bling. There is not enough bling available for any other mp3 player.
http://www.apple.com/ipod/accessories.html
If you are virgin here is help
pimp-up is kind of upgrade
bling-bling is accessories
you're a Bloom County fan.
"We decided we had to be radically different from Apple"
Because, hey, contrarian thinking just for the sake of being different (or possibly out of spite) always works.
He meant cat lick. Cat licks aren't nearly as reliable as Toyota's. Well known fact.
NMG
Apple was so enamored with absolute pure, minimalist design that some designers may argue that ergonomics were compromised.
Let me guess, those designers would be.... Rio's?
EricRead my AdSense blog (goes with my new book for non-techies)
Oh, so there's only one page? I quit reading it because I figured there were 11 more pages and frankly, that much reading scares the crap out of me.
The crisp $100 bills are for lighting your cigar. The shiny nickels and dimes are for throwing at street urchins. The ones are for tipping the valet (tip: fold them over to double your largesse). The twenties are for doing lines of coke with the senator off the ass of a call girl.
Remember etiquette! We are not savage beasts!
I'm listening to Dave Brubeck on my iPod Shuttle right now and what I like about it is that is was $100.
:-) As for getting 'bling' to protect their iPods, there is an aisle in their store dedicated to it. If you were too cheap to buy one, to quite a friend of mine, "Suffer Bee-atch."
(What screen?
Apple's already making the iPod in Asia (so production costs can't get cheaper) and charging what their market will allow. I don't anticipate ever seeing an iPod down at Costco or Wall*Mart for $19,95. Sorry but there it is.
MSBPodcast.com The opinions expressed here are my own. If you don't like 'em... Think up your own stuff.
How many people in love with their iPods have tried other MP3 players?
Probably about as many people who are in love with their Porsches or Bentleys who have tried Kias, Hyundais, Zils, and Yugos.
I have a website. It's about Macs.