Slashdot Mirror


Morse Code on Cell Phones?

An anonymous reader writes "In a recent showdown, veteran Morse coders were able to send SMS messages faster via Morse than the fastest thumb-typists. What about embedding support for Morse code directly into handsets? This article on O'Reilly Network floats the idea of using Morse code to compose text messages, as well as tapping commands (i.e. answer call, forward to voice mail, etc) in hands-free mode by tapping on the handset case."

41 of 316 comments (clear)

  1. The Most Amazing Dupe Known To Man! by nokilli · · Score: 4, Funny

    Having already posted one dupe today, timothy pulls off the amazing feat of posting a dupe of a dupe!

    It's a dupe followed by a dupe-dupe!

    What do you call that?

    1. Re:The Most Amazing Dupe Known To Man! by tehshen · · Score: 4, Funny

      What do you call that?

      The usual...

      --
      Guy asked me for a quarter for a cup of coffee. So I bit him.
    2. Re:The Most Amazing Dupe Known To Man! by Norfair · · Score: 5, Funny

      Super-duper? Sorry, i'll get my coat.....

    3. Re:The Most Amazing Dupe Known To Man! by KiloByte · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Wrong. This is not a dupe.
      The previous set of (duplicated) articles said that a veteran Morser beat a semi-"veteran" SMSer.

      On the other hand, this article suggests a way to draw conclusions from that experiment and provide Morse as an input method for the cell phones, to have the best of those two world. It's a research -vs- application difference.

      --
      The creatures outside looked from Alt-Right to Antifa; but already it was impossible to say which was which.
    4. Re:The Most Amazing Dupe Known To Man! by Bloke+down+the+pub · · Score: 3, Insightful

      That's a fair point, however if I'd written the story, I would have added something along the lines of "as previously reported on /." or "following up on article XYZ", just to make those who shout "it's a dupe!" look silly (or at least vulnerable to a RTFA counterattack) - it's not as if that reaction couldn't have been predicted.

      --
      It's true I tell you, feller at work's next door neighbour read it in the paper.
    5. Re:The Most Amazing Dupe Known To Man! by eclectro · · Score: 2, Funny

      If there was a nuclear war there would be two things left.

      A cockroach, and a slashdot article about kids SMS messaging and morse code.

      --
      Take the cheese to sickbay, the doctor should see it as soon as possible - B'Elanna Torres, "Learning Curve"
    6. Re:The Most Amazing Dupe Known To Man! by eclectro · · Score: 2

      Wrong. This is not a dupe... this article suggests a way to draw conclusions from that experiment and provide Morse as an input method for the cell phones

      I admit, after RTFA, I find some of the notions quite interesting. But because the article referenced an article about the kids SMS going against the telegraph/morse code, it gave the article the "reek of dupeness", being that it had been duplified before. So I guess you could say the well had been poisoned.

      If the article had not mentioned the earlier link, it would not be nearly as bad. As it is, it looks kinda like a troll submission.

      --
      Take the cheese to sickbay, the doctor should see it as soon as possible - B'Elanna Torres, "Learning Curve"
    7. Re:The Most Amazing Dupe Known To Man! by AndroidCat · · Score: 2, Funny
      Wait, I get signal...

      Dupe-di-dupe-dip Dupe-dupe-di-dupe...

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
  2. Rather impractical by nmg196 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The supposed "showdown" on Jay Leno was a highly unscientific and inaccurate test which pitted the world's fasted morse coder using very expensive morse equipment against a teenager using a cheap cell phone with a membrane keypad.

    If the pro-morser had been forced to enter morse on a phone keypad instead of his $200 morsing 'bug' then I'm pretty sure he wouldn't have won. It takes several keypresses to send a single character in morse and just because it's morse, it doesn't mean that you can press the keys any quicker. He could only key quicker because of the equipment he was using.

    Add to that the fact that it takes ages to learn morse and only a few minutes to learn standard texting or T9 predictive text, I think you'll find that the take up on morse on phones would be pretty much zero.

    I think anyone's efforts would be better spent designing better keypads or improving predictive text rather than wasting time trying to put morse code (designed for carrier wave) onto a phone (designed for voice and data).

    The only part of his idea that I think is sensible is the idea that you can answer and redirect calls without having to look for the key to press (not that I find that hard after I've had my phone a few days, because you know where the main green and red buttons are without having to look). Having said that, most phones have any key answer if you enable it, and on a lot of bluetooth handsfree kits you can answer and make calls using a single button and voice tags (obviously requires phone support).

    Also, the reason morse is as fast as it is is because you hardly have to move your finger at all. The article author is suggesting that you use your fingernail for a "dit" and the flat of your finger for a "dah". This would be ridiculously slow and very painful after the first few characters as it would be a very unnatural movement!

    If you want to type seriously fast on your phone, then you need a way to plug in a standard sized keyboard (preferably Dvorak!).

    1. Re:Rather impractical by elgatozorbas · · Score: 4, Insightful
      If the pro-morser had been forced to enter morse on a phone keypad instead of his $200 morsing 'bug' then I'm pretty sure he wouldn't have won. It takes several keypresses to send a single character in morse and just because it's morse, it doesn't mean that you can press the keys any quicker. He could only key quicker because of the equipment he was using.

      While I can follow your reasoning, it is also not completely fair:
      - transmitting morse code is done using the equipment the guy used, transmitting text messages is done using the equipment the boy used. What you are saying is "cars would be not faster than bicycles, if it weren't for the combustion engines".
      - it is only your assumption that the morse guy wouldn't have won using the keypad. Maybe yes, maybe no. Not very scientific either.
      - No-one is saying this was a scientific endeavour. Was Leno nominated for the Nobel prize or so?

    2. Re:Rather impractical by FidelCatsro · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I always felt the test was like pitting Michael Schumacher in a f1 racing car against someone who got their license in a fiat Panda ,to prove that Germans have more testosterone .

      --
      The only things certain in war are Propaganda and Death. You can never be sure which is which though
    3. Re:Rather impractical by MidnightBrewer · · Score: 3, Interesting

      So really you're just agreeing with the results of the test - which is that the best designed Morse code equipment is superior to text messaging on a numeric keypad. It doesn't require someone with 80 years of practice, either - just enough. I used to have an interest in ham radio when I was a kid, and I have seen the advanced key switches myself. Amazing stuff.

      So we have Morse code, which works now and could be fitted to a phone. You have two thumbs and, as you pointed out, two big buttons; fit one to be the dot, one to be the dash. There you go. Ergonomic, really hard to make a mistake (assuming you know which hand is which), and already tried-and-true. No need to reinvent the wheel.

      I don't think this is a case to cry foul, but to appreciate a superior message-sending format. Morse code can be learned relatively quickly, actually - within a week, if you really want to. When you get right down to it, it's just a bunch of ones and zeroes. You would think Slashdot people would appreciate that. )

      As far as other technologies go, such as type-ahead find, etc, a japanese person would trump someone using the alphabet because they use a phonetic system that combines a consonant and vowel in every symbol, giving them a two-for-one deal. Combined with the fact that most nouns involve only two kanji and a far simpler grammatical structure and now you know why everyone in Japan emails via their cell, even with the limited keypad. Trust me, Japanese is a lot harder to learn than Morse.

      --
      "Give a man fire, and he'll be warm for a day; set a man on fire, and he'll be warm for the rest of his life
    4. Re:Rather impractical by dj1yfk · · Score: 4, Informative
      The supposed "showdown" on Jay Leno was a highly unscientific and inaccurate test which pitted the world's fasted morse coder using very expensive morse equipment against a teenager using a cheap cell phone with a membrane keypad.

      The two hams who won are certainly not the fastest morse operators. They were sending at less than 40 WpM / 200 LpM, whereas most good operators can send around 50 to 60 WpM. Probably they kept it so slow because the audience wouldn't have believed it was morse code if they went to their full speed.

      As an example, this is a sample of 60 WpM: click.

      Furthermore good morse equipment doesn't have to be expensive; I am using this homebrew sensor keyer for the last 7 years now and I am able to send over 50 WpM with it. Estimated cost less than $20...

    5. Re:Rather impractical by mrselfdestrukt · · Score: 2, Funny

      learning curve would be steeper for morse but one can also have a smaller fone (one that have 8 keys less)
      Hi Babe stop,
      Sorry I didn't phone you.stop.But my phone only has one button for sending messages. SOS Stop.

      --
      "I used to have that really cool,funny sig ,but it got stolen."
    6. Re:Rather impractical by Pat__ · · Score: 4, Informative

      Nice analysis, however morse code is in fact faster since it is very easy to provide a -natural- way for inputing morse code on the phone almost as fast as the morse equipment!
      In fact you provide a way in your own comment!

      > the reason morse is as fast as it is is because you hardly have to move your finger at all.

      That's why typing SMS using this program for morse code IS ACTUALLY FASTER.
      http://laivakoira.typepad.com/blog/2005/05/morse_t exter.html

      You use the keypad on the phone to type the dit and dah (left, right) and click to seperate letters/words. Try it if you have access to a symbian phone!

      Even if you don't know morse code by heart.
      Write a message to send by sms, look up the morse equivalent and write it down too.
      Try to input the words as sms, now try the dots and dashes (follow what you have on the paper without thinking, left for dot, right for dash, click to separate letters, another click to separate words) ...
      So if you know morse code it is actually faster than sms! Now learning it is a whole other issue http://www.learnmorsecode.com/.

    7. Re:Rather impractical by Tim · · Score: 3, Informative

      "The supposed "showdown" on Jay Leno was a highly unscientific and inaccurate test which pitted the world's fasted morse coder using very expensive morse equipment against a teenager using a cheap cell phone with a membrane keypad."

      Where the heck did you get this? I watched the video, and at no point were the morse guys introduced as the "world's fastest" anything. And honestly, I know morse, I know a lot of old-school Ham radio guys, and those guys on Leno weren't sending at any particularly blazing rate of speed. It sounded like 20-30 WPM, give or take. There are guys out there who can copy at nearly twice that rate.

      "If the pro-morser had been forced to enter morse on a phone keypad instead of his $200 morsing 'bug' then I'm pretty sure he wouldn't have won."

      IIRC, the guys in the video were using a straight key, not a "bug". Nevertheless, you're kidding yourself if you think the type of key being used gave them an unfair advantage. What gave them an advantage is the fact that morse requires one button, and therefore can be sent without even looking at the keys. Even the best telephone keypad requires a certain amount of delay while switching buttons....

      --
      Let's try not to let fact interfere with our speculation here, OK?
    8. Re:Rather impractical by L0C0loco · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Very true. This is all about the speed and efficiency of the interface. Morse is faster both because of the proficiency of that particular operator and because of the efficiency of the interface (namely two buttons/paddles vs a bunch of buttons not optimally laid out on a tini phone). In the end though I submit that just talking in to the phone in the first place is the most efficient and would meet all of the improvements suggested in the article (voice recognition/command already exists on some phones). Taking this one step further, developing a direct brain to device electrical interface is probably the ultimate goal.

      Enjoy,

      --
      -- Instant Karma's gonna get you! [320848 = 2*2*2*2*11*1823]
    9. Re:Rather impractical by sgant · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The operators have already stated elsewhere (I don't have a link handy, sorry) that they were limited in speed because the reciever couldn't use a typewriter to write down the code he was recieving...which would be much quicker. So they were actually hampered by is writing with a pencil speed.

      The morse operators were also tapping out the entire message, while the text-messenger guys were using abbreviations. Anyone that has sat in on a CW QSO would know that operators use a TON of abbreviations to keep the code quick.

      And it's true, CW equipment doesn't have to be expensive at all. In fact, to get on the HF bands it's probably one of the cheapest part of the hobby, especially if you're looking to do QRP which is running at 5w or less.

      --

      "Leo Fender was in a 'state of grace' when he designed the Stratocaster." -- Paul Reed Smith
    10. Re:Rather impractical by dabadab · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Well, it does, I can tell it from experience (even in Hungarian, which, being an agglutinag language, is ill fitted for limited size T9 dictionaries).
      The text used in the test could be entered on my phone without having to switch between the possible hits, so it definitely required less keypresses. The other thing is, what slows down SMS typing is the situation when the next letter is on the same button as the previous was - you have to wait for the phone to time out so you won't get "c" instead of "ba" - this delay is gone with T9.

      --
      Real life is overrated.
    11. Re:Rather impractical by W2IRT · · Score: 2, Funny
      If the pro-morser had been forced to enter morse on a phone keypad instead of his $200 morsing 'bug'

      I would also hasten to add it wasn't a bug that Chip used, but rather a Bencher iambic keyer, and they start around $100.

      Straight-key morse is somewhat unintuative and I think would wear off quickly. Two-paddle or iambic, on the other hand, is much easier and faster (usually left for dits, right for dahs). I can bang out 40+ WPM in a contest or while DXing with paddles.

      I seriously believe this would catch on in some segments of the cellphone-using population -- namely kids who want to send messages fast and those who see it as a cool thing to try, simply because you can.

      And of course, it would serve one other function -- to fuel the inevitable war between those who would be pro-code on cellphones and those would be no-coders!

      --
      Cheers, Peter, W2IRT
    12. Re:Rather impractical by kyojin+the+clown · · Score: 2, Funny

      in REALISTIC conditions a bike is often faster than a car. i guarantee i can get across london on my bike faster than you can in a car. even a taxi using the bus lanes. anyway, to fill this post with non-bragging content; was the kid using T9 or just mashing the buttons? the FA doesnt say. Either way, my phone is dead portable, it would ruin its appeal if i had to carry a 93 year old man and his morse machine around too...

    13. Re:Rather impractical by kyojin+the+clown · · Score: 2, Informative

      there are two ways of entering japanese on a keyboard; *using a standard latin keyboard and 'romaji' - for example 'k' and 'a' to type 'ka' *using a keyboard with japanese characters overlaid - find the 'ka' key and press it once i honestly cannot remember how my japanese phone deal with texting - its was somethin i did without thinking about - but i think each 'row' of the japanese alphabet (ie: consonant, then all the vowels - ka ki ku ke ko, ha hi hu he ho) had a key, and you would press it up to 5 times to choose the letter. there were a few modifier keys to chose 'combination' letters 'kyo' 'ryu' etc. the beauty of japanese is as the post above puts it - the kanji are mostly 2 letter combinations to express a noun. combine this with fairly simple grammar structures, and you have a language which is not only easy to enter, but doesnt use many characters either, meaning its easy to keep within your limit. disclaimer: i have forgotten a lot, there are people on /. far wiser in these matters than i, who may post a more educational response.

    14. Re:Rather impractical by fatboy · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The supposed "showdown" on Jay Leno was a highly unscientific and inaccurate test which pitted the world's fasted morse coder using very expensive morse equipment against a teenager using a cheap cell phone with a membrane keypad.Um, that was only about 30wpm. Nowhere near a record for IMC sending speed. That is the typical traffic speed I hear on the radio every day.
      If the pro-morser had been forced to enter morse on a phone keypad instead of his $200 morsing 'bug' then I'm pretty sure he wouldn't have won. It takes several keypresses to send a single character in morse and just because it's morse, it doesn't mean that you can press the keys any quicker. He could only key quicker because of the equipment he was using.

      It was not a bug. It was a paddle with an electronic keyer.

      That's kind of the point. Create touch sensitive pads on either side of a cellphone and you can use it as a paddle.

      I think anyone's efforts would be better spent designing better keypads or improving predictive text rather than wasting time trying to put morse code (designed for carrier wave) onto a phone (designed for voice and data).

      Morse was designed for the telegraph. Continues Wave transmitters came much later. Spark Gap transmitters were not CW.

      --
      --fatboy
    15. Re:Rather impractical by BreadMan · · Score: 2, Interesting

      My Dad (as a result of a stroke) was totally disabled, but could move a few fingers. In order to communicate, the PT group at the hospital got together with a local university and created a thumb-driven Morse code input device hooked-up to the latest marvel in computer technology at the time... an Apple II. The designers added some extra codes for the control keys and other symbols not in Morse code.

      After about 3 weeks of training, Dad could "type" rapidly; and this was a person who didn't have full hand/finger dexterity. In a few months, he was going faster than the computer could process the keystrokes. Before getting the Morse code adapter, he had tried several other specialized communication devices, but none let him be as expressive, worked as well, or was as flexible.

      We never did get a WpM measurement, but 40 WpM sounds about right.

    16. Re:Rather impractical by pyser · · Score: 3, Interesting

      It takes several keypresses to send a single character in morse

      True, but so it also does using a telephone keyboard, where, depending on the protocol used, it takes one to three keypresses (and sometimes a short wait) to send a single character. It would be a simple matter to set up the keyboard with two buttons, one for dit and one for dah, just like a paddle would be configured. (Some ham rigs, including the cute little Elecraft KX1 allow you to do this with the front panel buttons if you don't happen to have a key handy.) Add an iambic keyer (which alternates between dit and dah when both levers are pressed simultaneously -- a highly efficient way of sending at high speed. More on this here [27k PDF] ) and you can send multi-element characters with one or two keypresses. Example: the letter Y is dah-di-dah-dah. You hold the dah, then tap the dit once, and keep holding dah until the last dah is sent. The keyer forms the character for you. Result: you only need two presses instead of four. In the case of our telephone handset, you have to press the 9 button three times to send a Y (W..X..Y). Result: With Morse, 33% fewer keystrokes for that character. Want another example? E, the most common letter. Morse: dit. Phone: 33. 50% fewer with Morse!

      Ergonomically, you could even set it up so that the buttons you find on the outside edges of the handset (like on some Motorola phones) are your keying buttons so there would be no need to locate the right keys on the keypad.

      it takes ages to learn morse

      Not really. One can become proficient at about 5 words per minute in just a few weeks or even shorter if you work at it. The average person needs about 30 hours of study - about a half hour twice a day for a month. I've taught Morse to the level of proficiency needed to obtain an Amateur license in about six weeks.

      morse code (designed for carrier wave)

      Not really - it was originally designed for use on a DC wire circuit, where the key opening and closing would click a sounder at the other end. It was designed, and works, anywhere you can signal with an on-off state, such as signal lights on Navy ships or even conceivably smoke signals. It is said that Thomas Edison's wife communicated with him after he became deaf by tapping out Morse on his knee. Actually, its first use in radio was to key a spark generator, which produced not a carrier wave but a broad spectrum of noise. (Modern Morse radio transmission only occupies a few tens of Hertz bandwidth, making it one of the most spectrum-efficient forms of communication in existence.)

      Actually, this is an idea I've had for some time, after fumbling around trying to compose a SMS message while walking through the mall, and got to thinking that if only you could use Morse to enter the message, it would be a lot easier (for me, anyway).

    17. Re:Rather impractical by MidnightBrewer · · Score: 2, Informative

      I say this because I live in Japan, speak Japanese, and regularly send emails via my cell phone in both English and Japanese. English is a real bitch to type whereas Japanese is super-fast. So, yes, I'm speaking from personal experience.

      As another poster mentioned, Japanese do indeed use the so-called 50-sound input system, which doesn't necessarily require five keystrokes as there is also a reverse key (allowing you to go backwards through the list.) It also has excellent type-ahead find for words, and remembers the most frequent words and phrases you type so that you can often complete a sentence within two key presses.

      As for keyboard typing, I touch-type QWERTY at 80+ words per minute in both languages, and Japanese is once again faster simply because the words are shorter and the grammar simpler. A lot of extra time is wasted in English typing letters that serve no phonetic purpose in a word, as well as commas, spaces and the shift key for capitals. Spell everything phonetically, eliminate spaces and capitalization, and we'll be a long way towards competing. Until then, English is simply less efficient to type because it uses the alphabet instead of phonemes.

      --
      "Give a man fire, and he'll be warm for a day; set a man on fire, and he'll be warm for the rest of his life
  3. Semi-Dup by A+Dafa+Disciple · · Score: 3, Informative

    This is a semi-http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=05/06/03/0 525225&tid=133&tid=215">dup. This submission has an article containing a reference to the material that Jay Leno stole, plus an unnecessary commentary on O'Reilly Developer Weblogs that provides no revolutionary thought and hardly any intellectual merit

    At least this time Timothy's dup and its original post were more than http://hardware.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=05/06/ 29/0212242&tid=232&tid=14">8 hours a part.

    I'm not trying to be mean here, but is there anyway /. can fire http://www.monkey.org/~timothy/">this poor fellow and hire me for the seemingly cush job of /. editor? I promise to never dup! (or semi-dup in this case)

  4. Re:Not Going to Work by hilaryduff · · Score: 2, Informative

    not to mention the morse coders have a nice simple switch... the thumb typers have crappy little buttons and a slow cellphone OS to contend with

  5. It has already been done! by Pat__ · · Score: 4, Informative

    After watching the Jay Leno episode I was about to start writing a program to do that on my 6600, luckily I did some research before starting and found this with the source included!

    You write the sms in morse and it converts and sends it as a regular sms.
    You can use the joystick on the phone (left for dot and right for dash) so you have your finger on one button all the time!

    Also I found this page for learning morse code ...

    1. Re:It has already been done! by __aahlyu4518 · · Score: 2, Funny

      On the learnmorsecode page (very useful, thanx), the all-important and recently added @ sign is missing.

      It's dit-dah-dah-dit-dah-dit

      And the character to emphasize that there she was, she was walking down the street, is :

      do-wah-diddy-diddy-dum-diddy-do

  6. Re:Great Idea! by ketilf · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I think you're wrong. Kids are eager and able to learn new stuff, especially if it has some benefit for them. For instance, a colleague of mine has a 6 year old daughter who pretty much taught herself to read because she wanted to play online games and needed to understand what was going on.

  7. Morse slower by DrSkwid · · Score: 2, Informative

    according to this :
    http://www.160characters.org/news.php?action=view& nid=1541

    Just 90 seconds after Mr Hill began transmitting, Mr Gibson announced that he had the message received and written down correctly.

    The message was

    "Hey, girlfriend, you can text all your best pals to tell them where you are going and what you are wearing."

    thats 108 characters

    108 / 90 = 1.2 cps

    yet the world record for SMS entry is 3.7 cps

    http://www.smartmobs.com/archive/2004/06/28/sms_sp eed_recor.html

    Ms Kimberly Yeo,a 23yo business student,clocked just 43.24 seconds for typing this 160-character, 26-word text."The razor-toothed piranhas of the genera Serrasalmus and Pygocentrus are the most ferocious freshwater fish in the world. In reality they seldom attack a human."

    --
    There are places where the networks are not touching,and there are places where they are-Boeing's Lori Gunter
  8. Morse Keyer by Detritus · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Electronic morse keyers are very simple. All you need is one relatively simple integrated circuit (see The History of Curtis Keyers) and a switch or two. For a cell phone, the IC could be modified to generate ASCII characters for the SMS message while sending dots and dashes to the phone's speaker. If the phone could be attached to the user's arm or leg, it would provide a base for the keyer. The user could then use his free hand to operate the keyer. A pair of pressure sensitive panels on the left and right sides of the phone, near the bottom, would be ideal.

    --
    Mea navis aericumbens anguillis abundat
  9. Re:Morse slower - well almost by DrSkwid · · Score: 2, Informative

    morse speed records are measured in wpm, a crazy metric but I guess it stops people sending .......... really fast and claiming cps records

    Ms Yeo's was 36.1 wpm

    Hill/Gibson managed 14 wpm

    the record for morse wpm is in the mid 70's, but for competition they transmit for 15 minutes from a newspaper

    http://www.rogerwendell.com/morsecode.html

    --
    There are places where the networks are not touching,and there are places where they are-Boeing's Lori Gunter
  10. get your facts straight... by lophophore · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Huh?

    "worlds fastest morse coder"? nope. Not hardly. Just an experienced operator sending at less than 30 words a minute. Fast for morse code is 60 WPM.

    "very expensive morse equipment"? uhhh, no. Not really. They used a cheap "Bencher" paddle, $100, not any "$200 morsing bug"...

    Morse is the first and oldest digital transmission mode that I am aware of. The cell phone text message is also ultimately a digital transmission mode.

    Personally, I hate text messaging because of the clunky input method. The idea that perhaps there is a better way to enter text into a phone is intrigueing. Also the idea that the phone could output the text message as morse code is interesting.

    How many people are aware that when their Nokia sends "dah dah dah dit dit dah dah dah" it is in fact sending "SMS" in morse to indicate Short Message System? I hear it all the time, and nobody knows why it beeps like that!

    --
    there are 3 kinds of people:
    * those who can count
    * those who can't
  11. Re:The Greatest Dupe Known To Man! by MynockGuano · · Score: 2, Funny

    The Greatest Dupe Known To Man! (Score:-1, Redundant)

    Hilarious. Good luck to the meta-moderator trying to judge this one.

  12. Some numbers by smchris · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Sending morse code isn't so important to amateur radio any more but here were some long-standing requirements:

    5 words/minute -- novice/technician license.

    13 words/minute -- general/advanced license

    15 words/minute would get you highest privileges in some countries if I remember correctly

    20 words/minute for a U.S. extra license

    (a "word" averaging 5 characters)

    There are "Q" abbreviations like "QTH" for "location" and slang like "C" for "yes". But I expect most amateurs in the day were banging out under 20 wpm with a "straight key". It's true that a "keyer" can be a one IC device. Touch pads have been used for them. So I suppose a keyer could be integrated into a phone quite easily. Ergonomics could be a factor. I don't know how well you could key on the metro.

  13. Re:Mr. lameness filter says it's junk by i2878 · · Score: 2, Informative

    Just FYI...proper pronunciation of morse code is:

    . = "dit"
    - = "dah"

    so....your message would be...

    dit dit dah, dit dit dit, dit, dit dah dit dit, dit, dit dit dit, dit dit dit

    --
    legal. fun. profitable. pick two.
  14. Re:Cell Phones for the Deaf by sailracer6 · · Score: 2, Informative
    I would say that the Danger Hiptop, otherwise known in the US as the T-Mobile Sidekick, is an excellent cell phone for the deaf. I tried to get my deaf 80-year-old grandmother to learn how to use it last year, but she was just too old.

    In fact, you can even buy a plan from T-Mobile that has no voice minutes built in -- only data.

  15. Re:Mr. lameness filter says it's junk by n6kuy · · Score: 2, Informative

    Actually the dot is pronounced "di", except when it's the at the end of the sequence.

    So,

    di di dah, => U
    di di dit, => S
    dit, => E
    di dah di dit, => L
    dit, => E
    di di dit, => S
    di di dit. => S

    --
    If you disagree with me on social issues, then it's pretty clear that you are a narrow-minded bigot.
  16. Acronym Translation by k2dbk · · Score: 2, Informative
    For those who don't know:

    • CW = Continuous Wave, which is the method most often used to send Morse Code. Generally speaking, CW=Morse Code in this type of context.
    • QSO = a conversation between two or more amateur radio operators. Note the QSO isn't an acronym, but rather a specialized code that's part of a larger set of Q Codes used to minimize sending common information during a CW conversation.
    • HF = High Frequency, and in the above context I believe the author is referring to the bands between 3 mHz and 30 mHz (though CW is certainly used on all ham frequencies)
    • QRP = As the author notes, the use of low power (as opposed to QRO, which is high power).