Slashdot Mirror
Slashback: Justice, Settlement, Cosmos
"It is important, likewise, that the habits of thinking in a free country should inspire caution in those entrusted with its administration ..." zarathud writes "Logan Darrow Clements has begun the application process to build a hotel on land owned by Supreme Court Justice David H. Souter. This could be allowed under Eminent Domain after the controversial 5-4 Kelo vs. New London ruling which Souter voted for. Justice Souter's home currently occupies the land. The planned hotel, to be called 'The Lost Liberty Hotel,' will include a public exhibit on the loss of American Freedom. 'This is not a prank,' said Clements, 'The Towne of Weare has five people on the Board of Selectmen. If three of them vote to use the power of eminent domain to take this land from Mr. Souter we can begin our hotel development.'"
Call everyone Sir, just to be safe. Yesterday we posted an item about the first self-proclaimed Jedi in Parliament; here are two updates to the already-updated story. Americans (like me!) may still be baffled by the complications of the honorifics involved.
Stefan Magdalinski writes "If you want to link to the actual speech, then can I suggest you use our volunteer-run, open source, reimplementation of parliament's awful website?"
And reader Russell Dewhurst writes "All MPs (Members of Parliament) are called the Hon. Member for X... If the MP for Copeland were a Privy Councillor he would be the _Rt_ Hon (Right Honourable) Member for Copeland. So the original article was correct, and the correction was wrong, I'm afraid!"Thanks to everyone who's weighed in on this.
MozNews interviews Daniel Glazman, NVu Lead Dev bluephone writes "Now that NVu 1.0 has been officially released, we at MozillaNews asked Daniel Glazman to take some time to give us another interview to book-end our first interview with him, early in NVu's development. He was gracious as always, and fast! Read the interview for unavoidable laws, plans for the future of NVu and Daniel, and even news about his company's upcoming release."
Tom Clancy, eat my shorts. hydraa16 writes "The Cosmos 1 Solar Sail failed to reach orbit. This video shows its loading in a Russian Delta III Submarine, and its launch in the cold Barents Sea!"
If you accidentally blew up your DeskStar, the Empire will repay you. hardreset writes "Remember the day when the IBM 75GXP was the hot new drive? Then ... do you remember the day(s) it bit the dust? If you still have the serial number(s), you may be eligible for a $100/drive settlement from IBM. The settlement page is over here, claim form is here, and the Inquirer article is here. For those of you wearing tinfoil hats, you don't have to send in your drive. For those of you who work for IBM or live overseas, don't bother. If you're hoarding these drives, it might be a good payday!"
You'd have to pay me a lot to listen to the results. Kethinov writes "Because Trent Reznor's release of The Hand That Feeds was a spectacular success, he's decided to release more free musical source material for remixing and listening delight. The new release is another track off his new album With Teeth entitled Only. Interestingly, now he's offering multiple formats for the material instead of just Apple's Garageband format. So now non Apple users too can join the fun."
Its great to see Nvu (the Mozilla XHTML/HTML editor project) coming of age. A free XHTML able WYSIWYG editor is a tool many starting out building webpages could find useful, and begin to bring standards compliant design & creation in from the ground up, not just for professionals and those who choose to learn how to hand code clean and compliant code. I can only see this as a good step forward for compliant markup.
Business Voyeur
As always, people overseas don't get any compensation for crappy products...
I have two of these lying that has failed and one sitting in this computer which I am keeping a really close eye on...
Damn! Where do I invest? Sure sounds like poetic justice to me!
I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
Hell yeah, build a hotel on his land, this is america and those in power should be held to at least the same level as those they enforce the law upon!
) Human Kind Vs Human Creation
) It'd be interesting to see how many humans would survive to serve us.
...I strongly believe the government should instigate a policy of Eminent Domain on Intellectual Property, not just Real Property.
It would work like this: once a work reached a critical mass of popularity, the government would sieze it, pay the creator a reasonable sum, and make the work freely available for downloading and sharing.
In this way, never again would a citizen of this great nation be subject to the stigma of not having seen/heard the latest hot movie/tv show/song. It would also encourage creativity with uses like mashups, re-edits, funny overdubs, etc.
Support Fair Use!
A quick search on ebay reveals some of these drives going nice and cheap.
...I hope they include a diner called "Serves you right"
Your town may vary, but in many towns, the Board of Selectmen is elected. And if you didn't know that, neither do 99% of your fellow citizens.
What this means is that if three of them (or even if all five of 'em) don't vote to use the power of eminent domain (either because they think the planned redevelopment is a crock, or because they just don't care for Objectivists), it's entirely up to the citizens of Weare can choose whether or not their Selectmen are (or are not) worthy of re-election in a year or two.
I don't live in Weare. None of my business either way. But the Just Desserts Cafe sure sounds like a nice place for a bite to eat, should I be passing through the neighborhood.
Would be even better if they made a chain of hotels with locations in five cities.
It's also nice to see that Russia can still do these things, considering the deterioration of their strategic submarine forces in the past 15 years. Regardless of the ultimate success of the vehicle itself.
The world has changed a lot.
I just saw a demo of a WYSIWYG, drag & drop Web page editor, where you drag around page elements: real text (with associated styler/editor) sections, images, video windows, all scaleable/positionable/stylabe. HTML is seen/touched only on demand, not to layout. It's written in JavaScript, .NET and connects live to a SQLServer backend for its library, including saved pages. It all runs in an unmodified Internet Explorer, without ActiveX, Java or other client-installed SW. They say the update for FireFox is almost ready, just bugfixes - not a plugin.
That's the kind of "HTML editor" I expected to see in common use literally a decade ago, by 1995. How come I don't see such things all over the place? Are they out there? Do I just need to get out more? Why aren't they a standard feature on every website with a content editing/creation feature for users?
--
make install -not war
That's how I was about to phrase my comment, but you beat me. :p
New London should also elect new committee which would then sieze the homes of the former one. >:)
If it ain't broke, it needs more features!
Glenn Reynolds (i.e. the Instapundit) recently wrote a piece for Tech Central Station on the failure of the Planetary Society's Cosmos 1, which I thought was quite well-said. Here's a quote:
http://techcentralstation.com/062905J.html
Some might accuse [Planetary Society directory] Friedman of putting a Pollyannaish spin on things, but I'd say he's learned the most important lesson of all: It's hard to accomplish much if you're afraid to fail.
The history of success in all sorts of endeavors -- including the early days of space travel, when we were making rapid progress -- is a history of repeated failures. I don't think it's a coincidence that when the failure rate declined, so did our rate of progress. You learn from failure, and you learn from trying lots of different things. Unfortunately, fear of failure -- like fear in general -- is contagious. But fortunately, so is bravery. When people act unafraid of failure, other people may pick up on the message.
The Planetary Society's mission was, really, a failure: It was supposed to test solar sails, and it never got the chance. But, simply by happening, and by having the Planetary Society emerge with its head bloody, but unbowed, it accomplished something useful by opening up (metaphorical) space for others to try risky but low-cost approaches without worrying too much about the fallout. And that's good.
Because, as I've noted before, when you're not afraid of failure you can try lots of different things and figure out what works best. If you're afraid of failing, on the other hand, you build huge, process-laden, documentation-heavy, behemoths that -- in a way -- are already failures before they ever start because they're too hard to change and improve, and because they don't generate enough useful knowledge to allow further progress. (See, e.g., the Space Shuttle program).
The Planetary Society's launch, despite Lou Friedman's views, failed. But the approach it embodied is the only approach that's likely to achieve substantial success in the long run. And that's a kind of success in itself. Let's hope that we'll see more of this sort of thing in the future.
I went and found 2 Deskstar's that I still have, got all excited, told some friends... then I read that it's for USA only. That really blows.
PS - This is what part of the alphabet would look like if the letters Q and R were removed. ~Mitch Hedberg (1968-2005)
If the Supreme Court Justice's farmhouse can be taken to build a hotel, it won't be long before the Earth is replaced with a Galatic Freeway.
I had the idea that we should found a small community and then declare copyrighted works public domain. Now of course you couldn't do that for everything, since major corps like Disney would shit lawyers on you, but you could declare eminent domain on all copyrighted works over 20 years-old. if anyone complains, you "reinstate" their copyright. For a fee.
The economic claim is not only simple, but real. Imagine now you can scan and digitally print those old photos of your grandparents, you can archive old books and movie, and you can adapt and derive with impunity. That's one magnificent cottage industry just waiting to be formed.
So maybe this USC decision will actually have a silver lining. Without doing anything quite so ridculous and doomed to failure as traing to seize a Supreme Court justice's house.
www.eissq.com/BandP.html Ball and Plate System. Amuse your friends. Crush your enemies.
My new Palm Tungsten E2 lists the warranty as 90 days but if you are in the EU it is 2 years. What gives?
~~~~~~~
"You are not remembered for doing what is expected of you." - Atul Chitnis
Sucks to be you! I'm already planning my retirement in light of this news.
seems to be very difficult. The requirements:
1. Purchased a 75GXP
2. Experienced HD failure
3. NOT received a non-75GXP replacement or refund from anyone (IBM, Retailer, ect)
4. NOT received a 75GXP replacement, unless that replacement failed and you did not received a replacement or refund for that drive
5. Have your HD failure on record at IBM tech support, the IBM RMA database, or the "IBM 75GXP" database maintained by the Sheller Ludwig & Badey law firm as of February 15, 2005.
So, basically you need to have had multiple 75GXP failures until you just gave up on the warrenty process, or had a failure outside of warrenty but decided to report it to IBM just for fun, or had a failure and somehow knew about this lawsuit and the "IBM 75GXP" database being compiled and got on the list before Feb. 15.
Otherwise you get door #2 for just having proof of purchase of a 75GXP:
1. 25 CD-R w/ Jewel cases
OR
2. 15% off coupon for IBM products, max $300 off.
Great... just great... how about my two 40gb Desktar IC35L040 drivers from 2001 that crapped out?
Yeah all I need is another reason to keep old shit.
You're operating under the assumption (as well as most of America, I might add) that Judicial Review, A.K.A. the Supreme Court having the power to interpret laws in a general sense, not just in a particular case, is legit, when in fact it is written nowhere in the Constitution or any of the Amendments. It's a power the Supreme Court granted THEMSELVES in the early 1800s, and they have remained unchecked since then. Read the Constitution. The Supreme Court was created to be the highest court in the land, to make the final decision should an appeal go that far, not to distort the laws of the land to let atrocities like this occur.
Not to mention the fact that this infringes on basic rights protecting against unwarranted search and seizure. Besides, a statement like this needs to be made in order to get Congress to CHANGE laws to prevent this from happening again, if it was in fact legal, which I doubt.
Many people do not realize that supream court justices can be impeached.
Section. 2.
Section. 3
Section. 1.
Amendment V
Since clearly those 5 justices cannot read, congress has a duty to remove them from their office. I know many of you don't like the idea of Bush choosing 5 justices (perhaps more, there are rumors of retirement), but that is better than letting these 5 sit on then court. Write your congressmen and make it so.
Actually they don't need to be removed from office, just a reminder that the constitution governs this land may be enough.
I still can't figure out what all this right honourable MR. MP sir business, and its correctness or incorrectness, has to do with Jedi. Am I missing the datum, or has eevryone neglected the point of the article in favor of niggling peripheral details?
"I may be synthetic, but I'm not stupid." -- Bishop 341-B
Rather than a $100 coupon, or refund I'd much rather have them foot the bill to have the data recovered from my drive.
Did you answer Locke? Good.
Apparently the Supreme Court forgot about him.
And the parent poster's spelling is quite iffy, as is his logic.
Emminent Domain provides just compensation
All SCOTUS did was redefine "the public good" & "public use".
Not that I like what they did, but your reasoning is flawed.
[Fuck Beta]
o0t!
As any individual who has paid close attention to the automotive industry can tell you, the cyclical nature has brought boom and bust to almost all major automakers, save two. Those two, BMW and Toyota, have enjoyed a period of steady growth since both companies' inceptions in the late 1950's. While BMW is still on track for another year of increasing profits, this article will focus on what looks to be an unlikely shadow in the 21st century automotive industry - once mighty Toyota.
Toyota first started in 1947 in the aftermath of what was Japan post-WWII. Much in the same way that current-day Chinese competitors illegally copy the IP and designs of cars such as the Chery QQ, Toyota's magnificent rise to fame was the one-off Willys Jeep replica, the Land Cruiser. Throughout the 1960's and 1970's, while Americans were enjoying vehicles with power, spirit and style, Toyota remained committed to dominating the market through conservative styling, reticent power, and an attention to rust.
Needless to say, the inkling of Toyota in the American car-buying public's mind was not until the late 1970's. The oil crisis of the early 1970's changed the automobile market for decades to come. The Carter Administration issued a mandatory procedural change in early 1971 requiring all coastal ports to reject color-coded oil barrels from Iran, causing the price of gasoline to skyrocket to an inflation-adjusted figure of $13.73/gallon. Lines at the gas pumps were often miles long, and with vehicles getting about 9 miles per gallon on average, this caused quite a stress on the American buyer's mind.
Toyota officially entered the American market on April 1st, 1973, a date which will forever live in infamy to the executives at the Big Three, then General Motors, Ford, and Chrysler. While the Big Three were brand new at producing models barely large enough to fit Ted Kennedy and his girlfriend on the inside, Toyota had been producing vehicles the size of golf carts for over two decades. As the quality of domestic manufacturers slipped, more and more people tried what was then called an "import," short for "unimportant." This cycle continued for almost 25 years, with the market share for domestics slowly slipping year after year. As perception lags reality, many mistakenly believe this is still true to this day.
The first turning point in the fall of almighty Toyota is their first entry into the controversy-rife "hybrid" market in 1999. Called "hybrids" because of their ability to run electric motors on a mixture of oil and gasoline, the Prius was met with mixed reviews. Promising figures as high as 60 miles per gallon, the gas-buying public looked wide-eyed at the possibility of "energy independence." Intellectuals on the west coast such as Barbara Streisand and Ellen Degeneres sought to make a fashion statement in making saving the environment trendy. Things were looking up for the suits at Toyota, but the controversy was just beginning.
Soon the reports started rolling in that hybrids were dangerous. EMT workers were scared to touch them at accident scenes, with batteries filled with gasoline with enough voltage to shock and kill a paramedic. Because the vehicles do not have a transmission, the electric motors can propel the vehicles down the road at tremendous rates of speed without warning. Emergency workers were trained not to touch Priuses, for fear of any number of dangerous incidents to put their lives in jeopardy.
Realizing the initial success of Toyota, Honda took the next step in licensing Toyota's hybrid technology to implement into their Civic compact car. Their strategy was different, however. For Honda's hybrids, fuel injectors would not be powered electronically, thus the electric engine would only work when the main engine was on. While this produced less dramatic numbers for EPA estimates, Honda's move was enough to get themselves out of the limelight that was to be shed on the safety issues of hybrids in general.
The mythical gasoline figures that Toyota had relied upon to pr
I think a better business instead of a hotel and museum for the seized judges land would be a brothel. It has more appropriate symbolism.
Actually the Justices are quite capable of reading, the 5th amendment clearly reads, as you so nicely pointed out: ...nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.
In the Kelo v. New London case the homeowners who refused to give up their land WERE offered compensation for their private property.
That's not the contention. The contention is over the words public use, and whether it was legal for the Government to take their property at all, regardles of whether they would receive "just compensation."
It's also well-known that when private property IS taken by government for any reason (whether truly for public use such as parks, schools, roads, or military bases, or to turn over to private entities which would pay more taxes on the property than the original owner would), the compensation given is NOT just - the amount paid is usually well below the market value of the property - but that's not what this ruling was about.
OTOH, The (U.S. Federal) Government is the one entity that can use force (this means guns) against an individual without having to directly answer to another authority. One of the few 'indirect authorities' is the vote. When is the last time you (anyone reading this, not just parent), voted?
While I'm here, I'll quote the first few sentences from that link you gave, bold highlighting by me:
KELO et al. v. CITY OF NEW LONDON et al.
certiorari to the supreme court of connecticut
No. 04-108.Argued February 22, 2005--Decided June 23, 2005
After approving an integrated development plan designed to revitalize its ailing economy, respondent city, through its development agent, purchased most of the property earmarked for the project from willing sellers, but initiated condemnation proceedings when petitioners, the owners of the rest of the property, refused to sell. Petitioners brought this state-court action claiming, inter alia, that the taking of their properties would violate the "public use" restriction in the Fifth Amendment's Takings Clause.
Tag lost or not installed.
...over government actions now, because of the internet and the ease of idea transfer and instant publishing. It used to be a royal PITA to get any contrarian views published outside of letters to the editor or expensive vanity press. For all I know, back in 54 it might have been contentious,we don't really know, but now when government does something that angers people, millions can and do say something about it. It's much easier now, people are reacting almost instantly to governmental transgressions. We don't have to get filtered through some millionaires corporate newspaper chain to get published, or go to some shady vanity press outfit and shell out the big bucks. Maybe if we had the internet sooner we wouldn't have such a screwed up system, it's corrupt and bogus. All the judges are POLITICAL APPOINTED CORRUPT TO THE CORE LACKEYS. PUPPETS. All of them. They ALL have paid their dues in the democrat and republican government hijacker mafias, or they never would have gotten close to being appointed and confirmed. The US Government as it stands now-all the branches and agencies and departments- is a for-profit criminal racket,using threat of armed force to steal people blind over and over again, it's just easier to expose it and take action now. We can actually get our voices heard, it's just starting in earnest the past few years now, and they are desparate to contain it and control it, you can see it in their actions.
The next step is to fight back after the words are spoken or posted to the web, this proposed seizure of the judges land is just one excellent example of the people fighting back against corporo/fascistic so called "government". It's TIME these career-criminal bozos got a taste of their own medicine, in this issue or any number of critical freedom issues.
What happened in the past is then, this is NOW, which is way more important in the over-all scheme of things.
Well the problem is that they shouldn't ever had that power to begin with. They are prohibited it.
Article IV Section 2 Paragraph 1
The Citizens of each State shall be entitled to all Privileges and Immunities of Citizens in the several States.
Pair that with the 5th Amendment:
No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the Militia, when in actual service in time of War or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offense to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.
Note the wording, the powers and protections are guaranteed to THE PEOPLE not the STATES.
And also note the 9th and 10th Amendments which should lock this up.
The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.
The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.
There is no way that one can call forcing someone to sell land just so that another can buy it can be called Public Use. A hotel, my home, the 7-11 are all private lands not public. They can take my land for a park or a freeway but not for a shopping mall. Everyone knows that yet the justices ruled against it anyway. When Judges are that out of control and that unafraid to invent law then it's time to remove them from office. It's time to pass new laws about HOW judges hold office. The constitution does not set term limits, or a lack there of, for the courts. We can pass new laws limiting terms of Judges or even require them to be elected officials as they are in many states. We are NOT stuck with them. It's time to remove them.
Slashdot, home of supporters of free software, free music, and free speech.Except for Moderators that disagree with you.
http://maps.google.com/maps?q=34+Cilley+Hill+Road, +weare+nh&spn=0.040688,0.081050&t=k&hl=en
I can't imagine a nicer place to stay in New Hampshire... That looks like a perfect place for a hotel to me, being so close to both Everett Lake and Clough State Park.
I wonder if crow would be on the menu at the Just Desserts Cafe?
(see subject)
There are too many elected representatives in the U.S. Congress, Senate and Executive branches with strange "mystical" ideas - the religious right. It would be hypocritical for any American (especially evengelical republicans) to laugh at an Englishman for voting for a "Jedi Knight."
For an example just look at any decision/legislation regarding science, the environment or simply being "chosen" to lead... a war against the "fanatical fundimentalist Muslims".
There Is No Tomorrow
By Bill Moyers
The Star Tribune
Sunday 30 January 2005
One of the biggest changes in politics in my lifetime is that the delusional is no longer marginal. It has come in from the fringe, to sit in the seat of power in the Oval Office and in Congress. For the first time in our history, ideology and theology hold a monopoly of power in Washington.
Theology asserts propositions that cannot be proven true; ideologues hold stoutly to a worldview despite being contradicted by what is generally accepted as reality. When ideology and theology couple, their offspring are not always bad but they are always blind. And there is the danger: voters and politicians alike, oblivious to the facts.
Remember James Watt, President Ronald Reagan's first secretary of the interior? My favorite online environmental journal, the ever-engaging Grist, reminded us recently of how James Watt told the U.S. Congress that protecting natural resources was unimportant in light of the imminent return of Jesus Christ. In public testimony he said, "after the last tree is felled, Christ will come back."
Beltway elites snickered. The press corps didn't know what he was talking about. But James Watt was serious. So were his compatriots out across the country. They are the people who believe the Bible is literally true - one-third of the American electorate, if a recent Gallup poll is accurate. In this past election several million good and decent citizens went to the polls believing in the rapture index.
That's right - the rapture index. Google it and you will find that the best-selling books in America today are the 12 volumes of the "Left Behind" series written by the Christian fundamentalist and religious-right warrior Timothy LaHaye. These true believers subscribe to a fantastical theology concocted in the 19th century by a couple of immigrant preachers who took disparate passages from the Bible and wove them into a narrative that has captivated the imagination of millions of Americans.
Its outline is rather simple, if bizarre (the British writer George Monbiot recently did a brilliant dissection of it and I am indebted to him for adding to my own understanding): Once Israel has occupied the rest of its "biblical lands," legions of the antichrist will attack it, triggering a final showdown in the valley of Armageddon.
As the Jews who have not been converted are burned, the messiah will return for the rapture. True believers will be lifted out of their clothes and transported to Heaven, where, seated next to the right hand of God, they will watch their political and religious opponents suffer plagues of boils, sores, locusts and frogs during the several years of tribulation that follow.
I'm not making this up. Like Monbiot, I've read the literature. I've reported on these people, following some of them from Texas to the West Bank. They are sincere, serious and polite as they tell you they feel called to help bring the rapture on as fulfillment of biblical prophecy. That's why they have declared solidarity with Israel and the Jewish settlements and backed up their support with money and volunteers. It's why the invasion of Iraq for them was a warm-up act, predicted in the Book of Revelations where four angels "which are bound in the great river Euphrates will be released to slay the third part of man." A war with Islam in the Middle East is not something to be feared but welcomed - an essential conflagration on the road to redemption. The last time I Googled it, the
"Everyone is entitled to their own opinion, but not their own facts." ~The Honorable Daniel Patrick Moynihan
I'm curious why this particular "for remix" download is locked up behind a membership login. The previous download for "the hand that feeds" was up for anyone to grab. Did Interscope get the heebie jeebies? Maybe they've decided to leverage this as an opportunity for more demographic profiling.
It'd probably be bandwidth suicide, but has anyone mirrored the downloads yet?
Congress is fighting back against the Supreme Court decision too: House Votes To Undercut High Court On Property. If the bill passes, then it's not likely that the town will approve the museum/hotel in protest.
If you cannot identify your serial number, you can download a utility from them here. But if your hard drive is broken, why would it still be in your computer, and how would your computer be running to run this utility?
or else!
Q. What if I no longer have a receipt or any other supporting documentation?
A. You must produce a receipt or other supporting documentation evidencing the purchase of an eligible 75GXP hard disk drive, or you will not receive any Settlement Benefits.
Well let's see. I bought my deskstar in 2000, let me grab my file for that year... Ah yes, it's here under D, next to the receipt for that donut I bought.
Seriously I will be impressed if anyone can provide the required "supporting documentation." How lame is it to win a lawsuit that will apply to almost nobody?
Crappy thing is, I seriously have a stack of these deskstars sitting here. My last one went bad not even two weeks ago.
or else!
Just... wow.
There are so many mistakes, lies, and misleading statements in this "article" I truly don't know where to begin. Whoever wrote it should be ashamed of just how bad it is.
Amendment V
I, for one (and I'm sure MANY others), am pretty positive that this ruling, which goes against 200+ years of Constitutionally protected rights, IN NO WAY follows anything resembling due process of law and definitely does not follow the "nor shall private property" part of the Fifth Amendment. This is nothing more than a land grab from one private citizen to another private citizen WITH MORE MONEY TO SPEND and no moral compass. The overall benefit of this is that Citizen B, who decided they could put your land to better use, gets richer and can do it all again. And again. And so on. I really do see this ending in bloodshed unless Congress can wake up and do something about it OR each state enacts legislation guaranteeing that private property can not be seized and given from one citizen to another - regardless of tax revenue increase or the supposed "good" for the community. If taking the land from one citizen makes another citizen rich(er) by giving them the land to develop or it is not for governmental use (schools, right of ways, infrastructure such as sewer/water/electricity, etc.) then that land grab is UNCONSTITUTIONAL, IMMORAL, and ILLEGAL. In my humble opinion it should be treated as such and defended by every means necessary.
Before anyone starts bashing me saying "You're advocating violence" - I am not. There is a person on Slashdot with a signature that says something like "There are five boxes in defense of liberty - Soap, ballot, something, jury, and ammo. Use in that order." THAT is what I am advocating - get involved, defend what is YOURS, what you've worked your life for, put those people in power who DON'T want to give your property to their good buddy George so he can build a hotel, tell all your friends what a catastrophe the ruling by the Supreme Court is, and, yes, if it comes down to it gain national press by defending your personal property by force if necessary. But I am not saying that should be anyone's first choice - I just believe that it will come to that. I truly hope I'm wrong.
Dream as if you'll live forever.
Live as if you'll die tomorrow.
~Anonymous~
It is an interesting idea but I doubt it is consitutional. Both the Congress and the Senate can make the rules of how they govern themselves without passing a law. This is set in the consitution itself. I don't think this bill could be passed except as an ammendment.
Slashdot, home of supporters of free software, free music, and free speech.Except for Moderators that disagree with you.
If you're refering to the Michigan poletown plant, Michigan has since switched its position on the issue. The state no longer force private->private transfers. That's not to say they couldn't start again. As a result of this supreme court case, one michigan rep is trying to get the state constitution ammended to disallow it by law in the future.
Hats off to Trent. I'm a big fan of NIN, and have most of their "normal" albums, and some of the remixes. Downward Spiral was one of the best albums ever.
Public Enemy released the new tracks for Revolverlution before the record went out, let people remix, and submit back to PE. They picked the best remixes and put them on the album. Sorta like open source music.
Here it is in all of its glory, Behold, two IBM drives.
Man, glad this is finally over.
...unfortunately no one can be told what The Mat^H^H^HGoatse is...they must experience it for themselves...
One word: "backups".
At first I thought that the PP was just an ignoramous ("The Carter Administration issued a mandatory procedural change in early 1971"? Carter was elected in 1976, and his term started in 1977), then I realized that he/she was attempting to be funny/satirical/whatever. However, not only didn't I laugh at his/her post, I didn't even crack the least little bit of a smile, and I'm very easily amused. Please MOD THE PARENT DOWN, in order to discourage the poster from posting such massively unfunny shit in the future.
Thanks.
--
Your friend,
Mr. Very Easily Amused (but not in this case)