Slashdot Mirror


Bank E-Communications Aid During London Bombings

davidwr writes "Reuters and eWeek report on how the British Banks' emergency chatroom and web site helped them cope with Thursday's terrorist bombing." From the article: "The Bank of England, the Treasury and the Financial Services Authority switched on a secure section of their Financial Sector Continuity Web site to talk to major banks in the City of London's financial hub about how they were coping. A Bank of England spokeswoman said this was the first time the secure site had been used in an actual crisis situation since its creation in the wake of the Sept. 11, 2001 attacks on the World Trade Center in New York."

140 comments

  1. chat room overrated? by kyoko21 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Who said chatrooms are overrated? :-)

    1. Re:chat room overrated? by lukewarmfusion · · Score: 3, Interesting

      This makes me quite happy, actually. Shortly after 9/11, I did a web project for a healthcare system in a nearby city. The site was designed to provide emergency information for 1) doctors 2) staff and 3) press, as well as send email and SMS alerts. While it's unlikely that they would be the target of a terrorist attack, there have been situations where domestic crisis arose and with the chaos of the emergency, getting ahold of staff, and the flood of cameras, newsvans, and reporters it can be awfully difficult to communicate.

      They ran a simulated emergency shortly after the site was built and their protocols were put in place. Fifty 'victims' showed up with fake injuries and had to be processed.

      All of this boils down to one easy proverb: an ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure.

  2. Obligatory Blame America Thread by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    This will be the place to post the usual how America is really to blame for the London attacks, and that whatever wrongs the USA has committed somehow justifies or excuses the deliberate murder of innocent civilians.

    I know that's how this discussion will go, so might as well start it here.

    1. Re:Obligatory Blame America Thread by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Way to strawman it. Show me an example of it in the last story.

  3. Ugh by Quasar1999 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Really now... a 'secure' network for banks to talk to each other in? WTF are they using during normal, non-emergancy times? No wonder all these damned credit card/identity thefts take place... these idiots are broadcasting their info on unsecured networks?

    --

    ---
    Programming is like sex... Make one mistake and support it the rest of your life.
    1. Re:Ugh by ginotech · · Score: 1

      Let's see, how can I put this? No.

    2. Re:Ugh by Alex+P+Keaton+in+da · · Score: 1

      doesnt this kind of prove the original web point- wasn't DARPA net designed for communication after nuclear war?
      I think I read that 90 some odd percent of identity theft still occurs the old fashioned way- stolen mail... trash etc.
      But we geeks can be the communication network if anything goes down... think about it, an army of geniuses in bunkers (well parents basements) with stocks of food stuffs (cheetos and mountain dew in little dorm size fridges...)

      --
      And All I Ask is a Tall Ship And a Star to Steer Her By
    3. Re:Ugh by agraupe · · Score: 1

      How dare that man be in the forest in the first place! What was he doing there when he should have been moving heavy things and discussing his feelings?

    4. Re:Ugh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Payment systems are most definately secure. But other things the 'tripartite' system operates over are not, especially those related to business continuity.

      http://www.todayinthecity.co.uk/">Secret website for some government employees, totally unsecure and with a very obvious website address. Nothing especially confidential there, other than what the essential staff of the financial sector are up to [please detect sarcasm].

      Here is the central website for the 3 parties in the tripartite agreement, as well as being the public source of official information. The same server acting as a public news source (with all the associated problems of DoS), as the one that these secure communications are sent through. Now there's foresight. 10 points to the 1st one who can find the derivative of this URL that provides the secure log on page.

    5. Re:Ugh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wonder if Brit Hume used this emergency system to bargain hunt on the futures market? http://mediamatters.org/items/200507070007

    6. Re:Ugh by SeventyBang · · Score: 1

      you better verify the URI your tinyurl is pointing to...

    7. Re:Ugh by agraupe · · Score: 1

      Oh... not again! All my funny movie links are breaking! Thanks for the heads up.

    8. Re:Ugh by dyefade · · Score: 1

      You gotta wonder about the names they use to describe things like this. I saw an "Emergency Ambulance" the other day. Yes, it's for emergencies, but as opposed to WHAT?

  4. On that note... by ZephyrXero · · Score: 0, Troll

    The recent bombings have brought 9/11 back into the minds of many. So now is a good time to remind people that we still dont' know what really happened on that day. If you don't know what I'm talking about, here's a nice video I found today.

    --
    "A truly wise man realizes he knows nothing."
    1. Re:On that note... by cranos · · Score: 0, Troll

      I think we knwo what happened on 119. Fanatics flew into buildings killing thousands and giving the "neo-cons" just the excuse they needed.

    2. Re:On that note... by John+Seminal · · Score: 1
      You need to take a closer look at the evidence... There was some very odd stuff that happened that day. It's pretty clear to anyone looking at the facts that what we were told happened is not physically possible. It's tough to digest...but the more you look, the more you can not deny it.

      Can you give some expamples? How is flying an airplane into a tower not physically possible? Are you saying the tower should have withstood the explosion, and that the heat from the fires should not have caused the buildings to collapse? Those gas tanks were filled, and the fire was very hot.

      Or are you saying it was not muslim terrorists who caused the attacks, but some capitalists who wanted more control over USA society, more restrictive laws, less freedom.

      What are you saying?

      --

      Rosco: "If brains were gunpowder, Enos couldn't blow his nose."

    3. Re:On that note... by ZephyrXero · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      I'm saying some of that...but mainly I don't know. What I do know is it's something far from what the mainstream media reported. There are hundreds of little details that make in very very unlikely. The hole and wreckage at the pentagon were clearly not from a 757, no other building in history have ever collapsed by fire. Some of the evasive manuveurs performed with the planes would be hard for skilled pilots, let alone guys who had just learned and were reportadly "hopeless" by their trainers. I'm saying if Al Quida did it, they had alot of help...but most likely they're just patsies.

      --
      "A truly wise man realizes he knows nothing."
    4. Re:On that note... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      hrmmmm, first I ever heared that what we were told about 9/11 was physically impossible. Got any links that show some info? Not really surprised, but am very interested.

    5. Re:On that note... by ZephyrXero · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Well, the video I originally linked to. Then there's Physics911.net, gnn.tv, 911inplanesite.com, and alot more links at reopen911.org/links.htm

      There are also numerous videos studying it like 911-InPlaneSite, The Truth and Lies of 9/11, and so on...

      --
      "A truly wise man realizes he knows nothing."
    6. Re:On that note... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No building in history has ever collapsed due to fire.

      Homes have always been fireproof. Firefighters have always started fires.

      Either that or you're a moron. It's hard to say from here.

    7. Re:On that note... by Lifewish · · Score: 1

      The hole and wreckage at the pentagon were clearly not from a 757

      On what basis are you judging this? Could you give us some examples of things that seemed askew?

      no other building in history have ever collapsed by fire

      That's definitely not true. Did you mean "no skyscraper" or something like that? Mostly large buildings tend to a) be pretty scrupulous in their fire prevention systems and b) not have large amounts of burning aviation fuel squirted into them during a massive high-speed impact.

      Some of the evasive manuveurs performed with the planes would be hard for skilled pilots, let alone guys who had just learned and were reportadly "hopeless" by their trainers.

      Apologies for cluelessness, but what evasive manoeuvres were necessary? All I remember is planes being flown into buildings, which takes comparatively little skill. Like I say, this is probably just me not remembering it all terribly well.

      I'm saying if Al Quida did it, they had alot of help...but most likely they're just patsies.

      So who do you think organised it? If it was some other group of terrorists then I guess it's a case of "a rose by any other name"... It doesn't really fit the style of another world government, given that it was fairly irrelevant as far as relationships between large nations go. And if I thought the US government had the acumen to pull something like that off without any word reaching the press, I'd be a lot less worried about their position at the top of the dominant country of the day.

      --
      For the love of God, please learn to spell "ridiculous"!!!
    8. Re:On that note... by cranos · · Score: 1

      no other building in history have ever collapsed by fire

      This sentence in itself shoots down any credibility to you might claim to have. Of course buildings have collapsed from fire, in fact large chunks of cities have been destroyed by fire. Remember, the world trade center towers were something in the orders of 110 stories tall, any weakness in the structure was going to lead to collapse.

    9. Re:On that note... by ZephyrXero · · Score: 0, Troll

      Yes...I meant to say skyscraper.

      --
      "A truly wise man realizes he knows nothing."
    10. Re:On that note... by ZephyrXero · · Score: 1

      The sentence should have said skyscraper instead of building...but it is true, go look it up.

      --
      "A truly wise man realizes he knows nothing."
    11. Re:On that note... by ZephyrXero · · Score: 0, Troll

      oops, skyscraper...not just any building ;)

      --
      "A truly wise man realizes he knows nothing."
    12. Re:On that note... by cranos · · Score: 1

      I suggest you check out this link

    13. Re:On that note... by JeTmAn81 · · Score: 1

      Um...just out of curiosity, what are the stats on the number of buildings that have had Boeing 757 flown into them? I don't believe any building of that size has ever had to sustain an impact from a plane that big before.

      --
      "Me? Lady, I'm your worst nightmare -- a pumpkin with a gun."
    14. Re:On that note... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey, thanks for links. Reading some of these essays........ well i'm starting to think i was lied to. It's a little hard to belive, but there is some material that seems very plausible. What i'm wondering is why this didn't catch the eye of the left wing media, or maybe i was under a rock when that happend. Whatever the case, thanks again for links.

    15. Re:On that note... by ZephyrXero · · Score: 1

      That's because the left wings are just as involved as the right wingers...

      --
      "A truly wise man realizes he knows nothing."
    16. Re:On that note... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dude, I was there along with my wife and quite a few friends...we all know what happened, there's no big conspiracy theory in any of this, just a bunch of idiots who think that killing people will somehow make people think that their beliefs are correct.
      Its easy enough to read bs that people write and post online and come up with obscure theories about what may have been the cause, but when you're in the middle of it there's no question about it.

    17. Re:On that note... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Physics911.net? Will they do my homework for me?

    18. Re:On that note... by Mr.+Maestro · · Score: 1

      Really? No 757 hit the pentagon? How about this, I dare you to walk up to a loved one of someone who was ON THE PLANE that hit the Pentagon and tell them that it never hit.
      Then try and come up with a theory to explain all the missing passengers who were on the plane that never hit anything.

    19. Re:On that note... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Okay, I'll have that for you when you
      have your coherent thoery on how a plane
      was hijacked, the course diverted, flew to
      the PENTAGON, our military brain center,
      without being intercepted by a gross
      of fighter planes.
      And nobody got fired for being asleep at the job.

  5. Transcript. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    [Wanker] Whot's happening over there.
    [Boss] OMG we are teh fux0r3d!!
    [Wanker] Yea but, whot's happening.
    [Boss] The effing bus just blew up in front of me!
    [Wanker] I see. Wh0t about bank business? Wh0t's happening?
    [Boss] Fuck the bank! The bus blew up right in fron of me.
    [Boss] OM Gawd!!! We are totally boned!!!
    {Wanker] What ever. TTFN
    [Boss] OMG! OMG!
    [customer] Morning, I'd like to make a withdrawal, please.
    [Wanker] Sorry, it's my tea break. Ask him.
    [customer] Scuse me old chap, I'd like to make a withdrawal.
    [Boss] OMG! The bus blew up. You can't make a withdrawal. Can't you see the bus blew up?
    [customer] Yes but, the bank seems fine.
    [Boss] Sod off you twat!!! The bus blew up. We're fux0r3d! OMG! OMG!

    1. Re:Transcript. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      More like
      [Wanker] Whot's happening over there.
      [Boss] Some bloody cunt blew up a bus.
      [Wanker] Bloody hell, was it the IRA this time or some other crazy?
      [Boss] Whats the bloody difference? I'm off for my biscuits and tea.

    2. Re:Transcript. by Hogwash+McFly · · Score: 5, Funny

      [Bank_P42] What happen?
      [Bank_J67] Somebody set up us the bomb
      [Bank_T113] We get signal
      [Bank_P42] What!
      [Bank_T113] Main screen turn on.
      *** Al_Qaeda has joined #secretbankchat
      [Bank_P42] It's you!
      [Al_Qaeda] How are you gentlemen !!
      [Al_Qaeda] All your public transport are belong to us.
      [Al_Qaeda] You are on the way to destruction.
      [Al_Qaeda] What you say !!
      [Al_Qaeda] You have no chance to survive make your time.
      [Al_Qaeda] Ha Ha Ha Ha ....
      [Bank_T113] Captain !!*
      [Bank_P42] Take off every 'Financial Transaction'!!
      [Bank_P42] You know what you doing.
      [Bank_P42] Move 'Financial Transaction'.
      [Bank_P42] For great justice.

      --
      Mother, do you think they'll like this sig?
    3. Re:Transcript. by nmb3000 · · Score: 4, Funny

      [...]

      [Wanker] Ah, screw it. Any birds 'ere wanna cyber?
      [Boss] Yea, alright.
      [customer] Me too.
      [Boss] Baby, I been havin a tough night so treat me nice aight?
      [customer] Aight.
      [Wanker] Slip out of those pants baby, yeah.
      [Boss] I slip out of my pants, just for you.
      [Wanker] Oh yeah, aight. Aight, I put on my robe and wizard hat...

      Ref

      --
      "What do you despise? By this are you truly known." --Princess Irulan, Manual of Muad'Dib
      /)
    4. Re:Transcript. by Tackhead · · Score: 3, Funny
      > [Wanker] Whot's happening over there.

      [Boss] Blimey, somebody up and set us the bloody bomb!
      [Admin] New users logging onto secure network.
      [Boss] WTF?
      [Admin] Turn on the fookin' telly!
      [Boss] It's you!
      [m4d4r4b] HOW ARE YOU, GENTLEMEN? ALL YOUR BASE ARE BELONG TO US! YOU ARE ON THE WAY TO DESTRUCTION. YOU HAVE NO CHANCE TO SURVIVE MAKE YOUR TIME.
      [m4d4r4b] HA HA HA!
      [Admin] Sir?
      [Boss] Tally-ho, old chap! We're ready for this, clear the damn runway and get those Spitfires in the air! God Save the Queen!

    5. Re:Transcript. by RWerp · · Score: 1

      This is not funny, this is retarded.

      --
      "Long run is a misleading guide to current affairs. In the long run we are all dead." (John Maynard Keynes)
    6. Re:Transcript. by ZephyrXero · · Score: 1

      it should of gotten an Unfunny rating ;)

      --
      "A truly wise man realizes he knows nothing."
    7. Re:Transcript. by sthebig · · Score: 1

      > [Al_Qaeda] What you say !!
      The Captain said that, not Cats.

      --
      Please, stop reading my signature. If not for me, then for the children.
  6. Coming soon... by Ravatar · · Score: 2, Funny

    BritishBanks.bash.org

  7. Personally... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My first thought when I heard that there had been this attack: "hmm... time to buy"

  8. Don't give the news outlets the satisfaction by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

    Those vulture bastard 'news' organizations like CNN and MSNBC are nothing better than ambulance chasers.

    The reason these events are so terrifying is due to the GIANT headline reporting of outfits like these. They have newsrooms full of cheering vampires who prey on the fears of a cowering public.

    A smoking building full of bodies is nothing more than a huge upsurge in profit for these devils.

    It wouldn't be terrorism without the spin they put on these events.

  9. Secret chatroom... by thrill12 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    ...well, it ain't that "secret" anymore now is it ?

    In all honesty, I think the real power of such a channel only comes to light in a contingency that directly hits regular communication lines like telephone etc. In that case, an extra "hidden" link could actually have value.
    Now, it was primarily a human tragedy where communication was not directly at risk.
    Maybe they should have kept it a secret a while longer.

    --
    Slashdot: stuff for news, nerds that matter, matter for news, stuff that nerd
    1. Re:Secret chatroom... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The article never said it was secret, just a "secure section."

    2. Re:Secret chatroom... by sveiki_neliels · · Score: 1

      Wow.

      Dude.

      RTFA, it's the second word.

      --
      New slang when you notice the stripes, the dirt in your fries.
    3. Re:Secret chatroom... by John+Seminal · · Score: 4, Interesting
      In all honesty, I think the real power of such a channel only comes to light in a contingency that directly hits regular communication lines like telephone etc. In that case, an extra "hidden" link could actually have value.

      The police shut down all phones and cell phones. The early news reports were questioning if cell phones were used to detonate the bombs.

      Plus, if you have a group of terrorists, and they all have pre-paid cell phones, it is a good way to coordinate.

      On the other side, it must suck if you are hurt and need help, and your cell phone does not work. No, not at the site of the bombing because the police will be there, but if you are somewhere else, and have a heart attack or get hit by a car.

      Maybe they should have kept it a secret a while longer.

      There are no secrets. If you want to know what a country has or might do, just get together 10 of your super bright friends and spend 2 years thinking about what systems a country might have. I bet you would figure most of it out. Before you label that idea stupid, ask yourself 2 questions. What does the CIA do? Hire 1000 smart people who read newspapers, listen to gossip, look at satellite images, and they think and try and figure things out. #2, I bet Al Queda has been spending many years thinking these exact same questions.

      All you need to know is that everything created by the other side was done by human minds. Chances are they are using logic. So if you think about it long enough, you can figure it out.

      --

      Rosco: "If brains were gunpowder, Enos couldn't blow his nose."

    4. Re:Secret chatroom... by Telastyn · · Score: 1

      Why?

      I mean if it -is- really secure. During the WTC attacks, IRC channels [cnn.com's irc feed comes to mind] did exceptionally well, when cell towers and conventional communications mediums were fubar'd. During that sort of thing, a 1 to many communications protocol is what's really needed anyways.

    5. Re:Secret chatroom... by Dwonis · · Score: 2, Insightful
      On the other side, it must suck if you are hurt and need help, and your cell phone does not work. No, not at the site of the bombing because the police will be there, but if you are somewhere else, and have a heart attack or get hit by a car.

      With GSM, emergency calls are treated specially (for example, you don't need a SIM to make emergency calls. well, at least not in Canada/USA), so it's possible that emergency calls still worked, while regular calls were blocked.

    6. Re:Secret chatroom... by cofaboy · · Score: 1

      Ah common folks it was just a few bombs.

      Like we've never had any before DOH

      --
      In the end, It's all bovine dung you know
    7. Re:Secret chatroom... by n+xnezn+juber · · Score: 1

      While I agree that the CIA can figure out most of what a country might do, I think it is better to say that the CIA can figure out what things might happen but can only give probabilies of what will happen. When you put it that way, you realize the difficulty of accurately predicting an individual terrorist's behavior. Um... I guess like psychohistory ala Asimov.

    8. Re:Secret chatroom... by Durrik · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Not only GSM but all cellphones I know will work on the emergency numbers. Both the phones and the infrastructure are set up to throw out all rules when the user keys in 911 (or 119 depending on where you are).

      For instance a phone that shows no service because, the provider in the area rejects the phone for whatever reason, will throw away its perferred roaming list and latch onto the first compatible signal it finds and makes the call.

      By law (in most places) the provider must route the call through even though they might not get the customer to pay for it.

      Usually when a call is made the network sends requests to the billing center to make sure the call is allowed, during an emergency call this process is bypassed. And often if the base station doesn't have the capacity for the new call, and can't kick it off to another channel, will drop a current call to allow the emergency call through. Of course in an emergency like the bombing, ALL calls are probably emergency calls, and you'll have capacity problems.

      When the police shut down the networks in the UK, they probably just got the providers to move the network into an emergency calls only state. That's not really a problem because if cell phones were used to trigger off the bombs they wouldn't be able to receive a call in this mode.

      --
      Software Engineer & Writer of Military Science Fiction and Fantasy Blog: petermwright.com Twitter: WrightPeterM
    9. Re:Secret chatroom... by unitron · · Score: 1
      "Secret chatroom...well, it ain't that "secret" anymore now is it ?"

      Of course it is. And that "Secret Organization Group of al Qaeda of Jihad in Europe" that are supposed to have put up a web page claiming responsibility for the explosions in London? Yep, still secret.

      --

      I see even classic Slashdot is now pretty much unusable on dial up anymore.

    10. Re:Secret chatroom... by Phroggy · · Score: 1

      Both the phones and the infrastructure are set up to throw out all rules when the user keys in 911 (or 119 depending on where you are).

      999 in the UK I think...

      --
      $x='S24;r)>63/* h@<5+oZ)32"5cz';$me='phroggy'x$];
      $x=~y+ -xz+\0-Tx+;print$_^chop$me for split'',$x;
    11. Re:Secret chatroom... by genus+babbage · · Score: 1

      yes, 999, or 112 - 112 is the EU emergency number, and in theory should work in most or all of the EU (unlike 999 it will also ignore the keyboard lock of GSM mobile phones)

    12. Re:Secret chatroom... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, on the "Secret Organization Group of al Qaeda of Jihad in Europe" it is actually a double-secret organization.

      The full name is:
      Secret Organization Group of al Qaeda of Jihad in Europe f.k.a Double-Secret Organization Group of al Qaeda of Jihad in Europe

      They have simply revealed one of their cloaks of secrecy. I presume that when they are caught, double-secret probation is not in their cards.

    13. Re:Secret chatroom... by chiddiscokid · · Score: 1

      The police shut down all phones and cell phones.

      No they didn't. The problems with the network were caused by congestion. See http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/technology/4659737.stm

  10. Security by ginotech · · Score: 1

    I wonder how secure it is...what with all this stuff about protected areas of websites being found, anyone wanna take a crack at it? ;)

    1. Re:Security by simplypeachy · · Score: 3, Funny

      What...you've not seen the hidden servers.ini entry in mIRC for irc.gov.uk?

      It's great fun. You should see the op wars in #commons.

      MikeyHoward: "L" is for Labour. "L" is for Lice.
      * MikeyHoward makes TonyB -o
      TonyB: Get over it, Tory boys!
      * ChanServ makes TonyB +o
      -ChanServ- TonyB used Op in #commons
      * BettyBoothroid (services@irc.gov.uk) has joined #commons
      * BettyBoothroid sets mode +b *!*@*
      * BettyBoothroid kicks MikeyHoward from #commons (MKICK from QueenLiz)
      * BettyBoothroid kicks TonyB from #commons (MKICK from QueenLiz)

      sorry. I'll get my hat.

    2. Re:Security by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Well, you can give it a try. The standard technology used to secure these sites is 128-bit certificates, maybe with a backup system such as biometrics or Secure ID tags. Plus, all traffic in and out is monitored and recorded 24x7 (it's a regulatory requirement), so a bunch of IPs knocking on the door would get noticed in seconds flat.

  11. knight my accountant by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The CEOs will probably be knighted for their gallant actions in this time of national threat.

  12. whew by milktoastman · · Score: 1

    At least something useful came out of the Stink Branch Community! Finally justifying their millings about.

  13. say it ain't so! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You can use encryption to talk securely over the internet? What will they think of next?!?

  14. IRC Chat Script by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What happen ? Somebody set up us the bomb. We get signal. What ! Main screen turn on. It's you !! How are you gentlemen !! All your base are belong to us. You are on the way to destruction. What you say !! You have no chance to survive make your time. Ha Ha Ha Ha ....

  15. Come on people... by sveiki_neliels · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Did you not hear all about phone systems and long-distance phone networks getting clogged with calls? If it's anything like here in Canada, when phone systems are backed up, priority can only be obtained for connections by emergency services. On a dedicated network, using a web-based chatline is a simple (and simple is beautiful) way for the banks to conference call with the treasury and whatnot without worrying about phone problems. The whole point is that the banks are legitimately worried about becoming targets, this makes sense.

    --
    New slang when you notice the stripes, the dirt in your fries.
    1. Re:Come on people... by Tim+C · · Score: 2, Informative

      Did you not hear all about phone systems and long-distance phone networks getting clogged with calls?

      Some of us didn't just hear about it, we were trying to use the network at the time. I live on the outskirts of London and work in the centre, and was walking across London (due to the public transport shutdown) at the time. The first I knew of any bombs was when I got an sms from my parents asking if I was ok.

      It took a frustrating couple of minutes to get through to them, and then to my girlfriend, who had been trying to get in touch with me for about an hour. Still, in the circumstances, I think a couple of minutes is perfectly acceptable; it's the same at New Year's Eve, another time when everyone is phoning everyone.

      In contrast, when I finally got to the office at around 10:30, my net connection was fine. The BBC news website (news.bbc.co.uk) was responding well, although a little sluggishly, while the Transport for London site (www.tfl.gov.uk, the main website for information on public transport in London) was naturally having trouble coping until they replaced it with a single static page. The net itself was unaffected, at least from my point of view.

    2. Re:Come on people... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      It took a frustrating couple of minutes to get through to them [my parents], and then to my girlfriend, who had been trying to get in touch with me for about an hour.
      I know this is no laughing matter - but ROFTLMAO.

      Get real. If you, or your parents, can't take a few minutes uncertainty - get therapy. You have some very deep problems.

  16. Excerpt from a transcript by iamdrscience · · Score: 5, Funny

    bankofE89: wtf? something blew up
    treasury49: yep i know treasury49: r u ok?
    bankofE89: ya
    bankofE89: it wasnt nearby
    treasury49: ok
    bankofE89: a/s/l?

    1. Re:Excerpt from a transcript by jd · · Score: 1
      Actually, I think they use a/s/l/acc#.


      Besides, I thought everyone knew that the Bank of England's center of operations was Pern MUSH.

      --
      It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
  17. Loop of insanity by shanen · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Okay, it's not directly on the banking network, but this is the background of the situation as it exists now. We have an increasingly complicated and fragile infrastructure, and it's all bandaids.

    Basically, based on 9/11, BushCo has demanded and received great power. They claimed they needed these new powers to fight "the terrorists". Instead, they mostly ignored the terrorists and applied the military parts of the power to Iraq, and applied the political power to increasing their control of America.

    The results? BushCo has greatly increased their political power in America, so that part is a "success", as they see it. Most of the world is increasingly polarized against America. UBL is about where he was before, though Al Qaeda is now estimated to have grown from a few hundred hard-core fanatics on 9/11 (of 2001) to tens of thousands of fanatics. In addition, BushCo has created a vast pool of revenge seekers and other potential recruits. Al Qaeda can apparently attack at will, and we just have to be greatful for trivialities, such as no chemical weapons--this time.

    Iraq was in bad shape under Saddam, but now it is a total disaster zone. If BushCo left tomorrow it would be a total loss, with thousands of lives and billions of dollars gone. BushCo claims those losses now have to be considered an investment, and we have to keep pouring more good lives and good money down the the drain. And meanwhile, their own companies continue to make enormous profits on the entire fiasco. In particular, their oil interests make increasing profits as the price of oil skyrockets. Their military companies profit on new bombs. Their construction companies will profit again on cleaning up Iraq, assuming we ever get to that stage.

    Finally, to close the loop, much of that money is being piped to the Saudis and other Islamic extremists, who then leak some of it to Al Qaeda, thus helping them commit fresh atrocities such as the latest attacks in London, thus justifying more political power for BushCo.

    Excuse me, but the robust banking network is *NOT* important.

    --
    Freedom = (Meaningful - Coerced) Choice != (Speech | Beer^2), and sad sock puppets' bad mods avail them naught.
    1. Re:Loop of insanity by xMilkmanDanx · · Score: 1

      Sadly, this is far too insightful. +1 insightful, -5 depressing.

      Even sadder still, there are many @#$%ing idiots who actually believe that going to Iraq is flushing out the existing terrorists and not creating new ones!

    2. Re:Loop of insanity by John+Seminal · · Score: 0
      Even sadder still, there are many @#$%ing idiots who actually believe that going to Iraq is flushing out the existing terrorists and not creating new ones!

      I know if someone killed a member of my family, I would never forgive that person. So if an air force airplane drops a bomb, and people who I cared about die, it would make that person want to get even. They can't fight the airplane, so they start looking for where to take out their frustrations. Before you know it, a person who was reasonable is now strapping on a suicide bomb, and getting ready to go and explode on a bus or in a cafe.

      The only reason this is not so bad is because nobody has done suicide bombs in the USA. I think if there was 1 suicide bomb each day in the USA for 30 days, at the end of the 30 days the people would be ready to vote every member of congress out of office, and elect pacifists. War is hell, but we don't have war on USA soil. So most people in the USA have no idea what having fighting and a police state is like.

      Getting back to the OP, those deep feelings of hate that are developing will be very difficult to mend. Those are the kinds of hate that parents will teach their children.

      Damage was done to the reputation of the USA. When Bush says we liberated Iraq, I wonder how many other places that get liberated want to kill the people who give them freedom. Did the Germans have insurgents who wanted to kill all Americans when we liberated the concentration camps?

      --

      Rosco: "If brains were gunpowder, Enos couldn't blow his nose."

    3. Re:Loop of insanity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fucking trolls.

      You never miss a chance to spout off at the mouth about how much you hate George Bush.

      Everything you just said is speculation and lies. I speculate that you murder babies, does make me insightful. The only difference is, your disgustingly redundant and asinine suppositions translate to instant karma on /., without fail.

    4. Re:Loop of insanity by unitron · · Score: 1
      "Even sadder still, there are many @#$%ing idiots who actually believe that going to Iraq is flushing out the existing terrorists and not creating new ones!"

      Shouldn't that be "...many @#$%ing idiots running our government who actually believe that going to Iraq is flushing out the existing terrorists and not creating new ones!"?

      --

      I see even classic Slashdot is now pretty much unusable on dial up anymore.

    5. Re:Loop of insanity by aprilsound · · Score: 1
      Excuse me, but the robust banking network is *NOT* important.
      But it helps minimize the chaos in our lives resulting from terrorism. Not to say that the 50+ dead and 700+ wounded are insignificant, but if you put it in perspective, more people will die in auto accidents or from cancer in between now and the next terror attack. By having a stable infrastructure, you help minimize the lasting fear, because people see that things will be ok. That's why it's called terrorism. The threat to you individually is minute. The odds that you or a friend/family member will be killed by terrorists is minimal. But the fear that grips a nation when terror attacks disrupt everything is what the terrorists want.

      Anyways all that has been said before. We want to minimize fear.

      On the other side, why do yo think Al Qaeda only attack every now and then? They could manage hundreds of terrorist attacks a year if they wanted, but they don't. They are attacking to send a message. I don't know what that message is, but I imagine it is fairly clear to the world's leaders. Probably something along the lines of, "Stay out of the middle east."

      Which brings us back to Iraq. I in no way support the US ever having gone there, but think about it from the terrorists perspective.

      Among other things, they want the West out of the Middle East. Well 9/11 just did wonders for that didn't it? Like it or not, Iraq has to have a lot of them wondering if the best way to get rid of the West is to keep up the terror attacks.

      Of course, maybe they'll decide to wipe us all out instead...

    6. Re:Loop of insanity by Neoprofin · · Score: 1, Insightful

      They could launch dozens of terrorists attacks, but what would it accomplish?

      For one terrorist attack the U.S. has occupied two countries, spent billions on revamps and reorganization, detained thousands. If their were terrorist assaults ever weekend how long do you think it would take before every street corner had an armed guard and the middle east was a smouldering nuclear wasteland?

      Would that solve the problem? Probably not. One would almost hope that as another poster spoke, that the terrorist would realize at some point that bombing is counter productive.

    7. Re:Loop of insanity by Tony+Hoyle · · Score: 1

      A robust banking network is *Very* important.

      If the banking system suffers as a result of what is a comparatively minor disruption (transport out of action for a day) then the effects are multuplied.. businesses go bankcrupt, people lose their jobs, etc.

      As it is, today London is back on its feet and is carrying on as if nothing happened. This is as it should be... any other reaction would be to let the terrorists win (they must be *really* pissed off that we couldn't give a crap about them...).

    8. Re:Loop of insanity by shanen · · Score: 1
      Fucking anonymous cowards. Takes a whole lot of guts to be such a sniveling piece of nameless garbage, doesn't it?

      If you actually believe in something, why don't you want it associated with you? Noticed the smell, eh?

      --
      Freedom = (Meaningful - Coerced) Choice != (Speech | Beer^2), and sad sock puppets' bad mods avail them naught.
  18. Re:Infinite loop of insanity by shanen · · Score: 1

    Just realized the mistake on the title, but nothing can be done there...

    --
    Freedom = (Meaningful - Coerced) Choice != (Speech | Beer^2), and sad sock puppets' bad mods avail them naught.
  19. Good for them by ottffssent · · Score: 5, Insightful

    "In the wake of 9/11..." is all too often used to start a paragraph which boils down to "...government spent a ton of money doing absolutely nothing for security while simultaneously doing far more harm to a free and democratic way of life than the terrorists ever could."

    I'm pleased to see that at least in one case, someone actually gets it. You can't stop the terrorists. Random bad stuff happens in life, and the best thing for it is to be as prepared as you can. Communications is the single best way to spend money in preparation for insert-bad-stuff-here. Be it terrorism, natural disaster, industrial accident, or what have you, better communications saves lives. As has been said many times by everyone whose job doesn't involve spending billions of dollars, more money should not be spent on trying to prevent disasters, it should be spent on ways to clean up after them. Billions in airport screening is a complete waste of money because it just forces someone to bomb a mall or movie theater instead - billions in police training, EMT and EMS training, hospitals and clinics, etc. is money that will reap rewards no matter what happens next.

    1. Re:Good for them by dave420 · · Score: 1

      You can stop the terrorists, but it seems no-one wants to do that. But that's another story.

  20. Things seemed to work ok by t_allardyce · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I was pretty impressed that my net connection was running perfectly the whole time and various news sites seemed to be coping. I was talking on Skype no problem, but the land and mobile phones were taking a few tries to get through. Even so there were plenty of pictures from camera phones getting on the net.

    --
    This comment does not represent the views or opinions of the user.
    1. Re:Things seemed to work ok by Compholio · · Score: 1

      I was pretty impressed that my net connection was running perfectly the whole time and various news sites seemed to be coping.

      That's probably because the internet was designed as the military's version of a secure communications network for emergencies. The reason it's called "the web" is because when you look at a map of the redundant links it looks like a spider web. I wouldn't be surpised if incidents like this will encourage more use of VoIP since it can take advantage of these attributes of the internet.

    2. Re:Things seemed to work ok by t_allardyce · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The web might have redundancies, but most ISPs don't have the capacity to handle all their customers at once, and most websites will get slashdotted in minutes.

      --
      This comment does not represent the views or opinions of the user.
    3. Re:Things seemed to work ok by krbvroc1 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I don't see the relevance here. The terrorists, whoever they are, attacked mass transit. Most people are not using their 'net' connection during their commute. Most people on the street are going to attempt to use a cell phone or payphone to call, not VOIP.

    4. Re:Things seemed to work ok by Larry+Lightbulb · · Score: 1

      Most of the people I know in London start work at 9am at the latest, so were either at work or walking between public transport and where they work. Using email was quicker and more reliable.

      Of course if it had all happened an hour earlier it would have been a much different situation.

    5. Re:Things seemed to work ok by curious.corn · · Score: 1

      Yeah, like the beeb site. In spite of going in lo-bw mode it was completely /. for hours. p2p is the legitimate kin of the original "web" concept. These 40-50 yo execs grown up on broadcast trying to force this perspective onto the web are severely damaging it. Hey, some time ago there was a picture of the internet's webbyness: An onion like ball with just a few (some 10s) fat routers in the middle... bad... bad... I remember when 9/11 struck out whole academic network crawled to halt (apparently, the core of it was in the Towers) and I had (yeah, well... not that I enjoyed it) to move on tv broadcast to watch the feed. We want a reliable distributed proxy network... no, we need one.

      --
      Mi domando chi à il mandante di tutte le cazzate che faccio - Altan
    6. Re:Things seemed to work ok by t_allardyce · · Score: 1

      BBC news worked for me, I was refreshing it every few mins along with CNN, maybe that didn't help ;)

      --
      This comment does not represent the views or opinions of the user.
  21. I like this one better. by master_meio · · Score: 3, Interesting
    Submitter picked a sparse article with little substance, and now it's slashdotted. This one actually has content.

    from http://eweek.com/

    header: Infrastructure

    Internet Chatroom Helps Keep City of London Open By Jane Merriman, Reuters and Alistair MacDonald, Reuters

    July 8, 2005

    Be the first to comment on this article

    LONDON, July 8 (Reuters)--A secret Internet chatroom run by Britain's financial regulators helped keep London's financial markets open after Thursday's bomb blasts, while financial firms activated security measures in case of further attacks. ADVERTISEMENT

    The Bank of England, the Treasury and the Financial Services Authority switched on a secure section of their Financial Sector Continuity Web site to talk to major banks in the City of London's financial hub about how they were coping.

    A Bank of England spokeswoman said this was the first time the secure site had been used in an actual crisis situation since its creation in the wake of the Sept. 11, 2001 attacks on the World Trade Center in New York.

    "In the light of yesterday's events, the tripartite authorities (Treasury, Bank of England and FSA) have activated the contingency part of the Web site," they said on Friday.

    The Web site has a secure section in which the authorities can communicate directly with big banks that are key to the stability of the international financial system.

    The City of London's financial markets, where currencies, stocks, bonds and commodities worth trillions of dollars are traded daily, kept going despite disruption from Thursday's bombings on a London bus and underground trains, which killed more than 50 people and injured hundreds.

    "Contingency planning by banks has increased considerably in last three years, post Sept. 11, and what yesterday shows is that the planning has worked," said David Key, crises management practice leader at Control Risks Group, which advises many banks on crisis and security management.

    PLANS IN PLACE

    Swiss financial services group UBS, for example, briefly evacuated its building on Liverpool Street, which houses bond and currency desks, but contingency plans ensured trading was not affected.

    Japanese bank Nomura did not have to evacuate staff to any of its three disaster recovery sites in London, but a well-rehearsed plan was put into effect, coordinated by an emergency response team, which held meetings every hour.

    Nomura security staff were alerted to the bombs by text, pager and e-mail messages sent by London's police service. A complete roll call of staff was taken, and a helpline for family and friends set up. On Friday, the bank was operating with about half its usual staff, with people being told they need not come in if they did not feel comfortable doing so.

    The Corporation of London, the body that runs the City, and City of London police also have an Internet communication system that was used on Thursday to pass on advice to banks and other firms in the "Square Mile", the European hub for some of the world's biggest financial services firms.

    Banks have long had plans for such attacks and routinely monitor code levels put out by intelligence services and the police. Chairmen of several big banks, for example, plus their security chiefs, had a briefing with intelligence services about four months ago, one bank source familiar with the matter said.

    "Banks' internal security teams have got better and more sophisticated as they have invested in best practise," Key said.

    "There has also been a move away from the traditional focus on security towards risk management, or understanding the threat and developing resilience," he said.

    CONTINGENCY

    The City of London is no stranger to bomb attacks.

    In 1992 many firms suffered devastation from a huge car bomb planted by the Irish Republican Army outside the Baltic Exchange in the heart of the area. A year later, an

  22. Whiskey Tango Foxtrot!?!?!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't know. What I do know is it's something far from what the mainstream media reported. There are hundreds of little details that make in very very unlikely. The hole and wreckage at the pentagon were clearly not from a 757, no other building in history have ever collapsed by fire.

    WTF!?!?!?
    Ok, what are you, ten years old?
    Are you stupid?
    Are you insane?
    Are you a complete and utter moron that should be put to death to prevent you from ever breeding?

    Knowing that there are banal, idotic, psychotic morons, like yourself in this world scares me more than any other threat, real or imagined!

  23. Resilience by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    "You must not fight too often with one enemy, or you will teach him all your art of war."
    - Napoleon Bonaparte

    I was working at a online gaming company that was acquired by Cantor Fitzgerald the Summer before the 9/11 attacks. It was a big learning experience to witness (from afar) the very personal devastation as well as the tireless recovery in the aftermath.

    Although CF's ability to recover from the attack was made possible by the sheer willpower of the surviving team members in NYC and other offices around the world, equally crucial was a backup computing facility that was completed during the Summer of 2001. A factor which also helped was the greater community of financial institutions that were helping our parent company in so many different ways.

    From this article, and other articles I've read, it is clear that there is a lot more resilience in the systems that keep our society going. We all learned the hard way, and we keep on learning. Even something as simple as a secure bulletin board can make a huge difference, saving lives, and speeding up the recovery.

    Unless attacks reach new levels of devastation, our organizational preparedness, "process routing" capability, and improved security measures will continue to reduce the ability for terrorism to disrupt the ongoing process of globalization.

    - JP

  24. Re:Good for them??? by John+Seminal · · Score: 1
    I'm pleased to see that at least in one case, someone actually gets it. You can't stop the terrorists.

    You can stop terrorists. Don't give them a good enough reason to attack you. It takes time and money to fight, and lots of people need to be highly motivated. If someone does not hate you, then why would they take all their energy and direct it at trying to kill and terrorize you?

    more money should not be spent on trying to prevent disasters, it should be spent on ways to clean up after them.

    I don't know what to think here. If you prevent the disaster, you won't have to clean it up. Is it a simple money equation? It costs X dollars for R&D to prevent a disaster, but a disaster only costs 1/8th of prevention. Does anyone here suggest if only 7 disasters happen, it is better to spend the money cleaning it up rather than stopping it because you would save some money?

    What is the price of a human life worth?

    It is like the bombings in Iraq that the USA military is doing. They say, for example, we wanted to get rid of insurgents and because of that, we had to kill some innocent people who were at the worng place at the wrong time.

    --

    Rosco: "If brains were gunpowder, Enos couldn't blow his nose."

  25. If only black and white were the only colours... by sveiki_neliels · · Score: 1, Insightful

    The United States is having its problems. The new "power" president Bush has obtained boils down (at least domestically) to little more than a fiscal stranglehold on the country, a limitation on citizen's rights, and xenophobic-type immigration and travel policies for foreigners.

    Political moves like this are inherently unstable, especially in a country like the United States. Bush's government is fiscally irresponsible. However, the true power in the country (the corporations) will lose faith in a Republican Presidency as soon as this government's economic plans start falling apart. Once that happens, he won't stand much of a chance.

    Limitations on citizen's rights can only go so far. We've all heard the secret rumours of the CIA and FBI and whomever having all this information on the American people. Things like the Patriot Act and such only mean that these organizations can do more of what they ALREADY DO out in the open. Once citizen's rights are more impinged to the point that the average Joe can no longer buy his smokes and beer as easy as usual, the next election will more likely than not prove that a US government can do anything they want, as long as they don't upset the delicate retail balance on which its people are addicted.

    As for immigration, North America, left to its own devices is a dwindling population of high-priced workers. As soon as employers have to start paying more when there are fewer immigrants, and consumers have to pay more as a result, that too will have to change.

    As for Iraq, only the narrow-minded see it in black and white. Yes, the United States Army has done a bang-up job (bang in the negative sense), but ask yourself this: do you think the average Shiite or Kurd was panting to keep Saddam Hussein in power? He was a murderous, power-hungry dictator that raped an entire country of resources and a decent quality of life. Yes, Bush went in for the wrong reasons. Yes, it is going badly. I can't reconcile my views on the situation in Iraq, but I know doing nothing is against everything I think the West should stand for.

    The attractiveness of terrorism against the West is more likely rooted in the ease in which people are recruited. Education and dogma of the Western Businessman as the enemy of the Arab, and a serious poverty problem make poor Arabs who are being kept down by their own governments and international embargoes caused by these nations problematic take on international "diplomacy" easier targets for recruitment as suicide bombers. Why not, if the leaders of these terrorists groups can promise that your family will be cared for (when you cannot)? Deal with THESE problems and we may yet get somewhere.

    When you blame it all on Bush, really you're just saying "Well, it's not my fault!". Wake up. It is all our faults.

    --
    New slang when you notice the stripes, the dirt in your fries.
  26. What was said on CNN by SeventyBang · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Someone on-air (as in local official) in London said (real-time) they were considering flipping the switch and killing all civilian cell activity.

    Don't shoot the messenger - I can't attest to the veracity of that.

    What I've found interesting is all of the information they've discussed which has been captured on all of the public cameras. From what they said today during the various press conferences, any repairs they make will include "that many more" cameras to watch for anyone trying to do this again.

    No guns, invasion of privacy with cameras, what's wrong with these Britons?


    oh. I almost forgot: ;)

    I've got some serious English heritage (can you say "Let's behead the King?") so I can't be too mean.

    1. Re:What was said on CNN by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't understand what you're complaining about.
      Cellphones WERE all cut off around the immediate target areas in central London to stop bombs being triggered by cellphones. Where's the problem in this? You'd rather allow the opportunity for bombs to go off just so you can call up Herbies pizza?

      As for the public cameras, that may be the (only) thing that catches these people. These people can be seen getting on the trains, then they can track at what time these people actually entered the train station. They can then see from the time logs of train cards being used where the ticket was bought, therefore where this person had travelled, where his home town may be, etc, etc, etc.

      This is an extremely complicated and time-consuming process, and will take a lot of resources up, but if it catches these people, it's worth it.

      Having stated how hard it is to track someone from location to location, it's therefore apparent that this cannot be easily used by "big brother" to track the general population.

    2. Re:What was said on CNN by nogginthenog · · Score: 1

      My cellphone was working on Thursday morning (I work in central London), but it was hard to get a connection. I think the problem was simply that the networks were overloaded with people checking up on each other and someone started a rumor that the Police had shut down the mobile networks.

    3. Re:What was said on CNN by dave420 · · Score: 1
      Well, as long as we have many many less gun deaths per capita as the US, I think we're doing something right :)

      The cameras are IN PUBLIC, not IN PRIVATE, so there is no loss of public. You can't walk down the street screaming at people to not look at you. That's not what "public" means. :)

  27. please stop by koogydelbbog · · Score: 4, Insightful

    can we drop the funny comments (and, for that matter, anything about people worrying about money). people died. it was only yesterday.

    thanks.

    andy
    london

    1. Re:please stop by onkelonkel · · Score: 1

      Sorry.... Um...Nope. Not the teensiest particle of respect or solemnity. We will be the same asshats 5 minutes after the bombings that we were 5 minutes before. Otherwise the terrorists win.

      --
      None of them can see the clouds; The polished wings don't care.
    2. Re:please stop by Sloppy · · Score: 0
      Sorry, but life goes on. And if you ever find yourself in a situation where funny comments are unwanted, then why bother living at all?

      So people died. Well, that happens every day, everywhere in the world.

      After months (maybe even years?) of planning, terrorists (possibly at the expense of suicide) managed to murder about as many people as typically die every month and a half in London in routine traffic accidents. If you make terrorists a special case, then what's next: is everyone going to have to stop telling jokes about cars?

      --
      As copyright owner of this comment, I authorize everyone to defeat any technological measure which limits access to it.
    3. Re:please stop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      David Ickes view http://www.davidicke.com/icke/headlines.php. Includes yet more 9/11 numbers? from the above web site:

      "I hear on the BBC that the first Bomb went off in London at 11 mins to 9. Familiar numbers eh? I have just seen [police] Commissioner Ian Blair on TV with a picture of Big Ben behind him. He was being interviewed in the studio and not outside with [a live] Big Ben in the picture"

      "Guess what time it said on the clock face of Big Ben? Nine minutes past 11. Familiar numbers? Already there have been references to 9/11 by government spokespersons and by people interviewed on TV. Expect links to terrorism and a big push for ID cards"

      I don't know if any of that is true. But it really is convenient for them that this happened even if it isn't a ritual killing inside job (which I think it was). This diverts attention away from the Downing St memo, The Karl Rove CIA operative leak scandel, and other media attention to the Bush and Blair administration mishaps. It takes away attention from environment, and giving aid to humans in need. Back to fear and war as a top priority. I also heard the UK might withdraw troops from Iraq, I suppose that won't be necessary now. That seemingly unpopular national ID card initiative may suddenly move forward after they've given things a little time to pass.

      I'm sorry about your tragedy there in London. Keep asking questions, keep investigating. Don't just float along with the media directed tide of unproven assumptions. Follow the money and ask who stands to gain from the actions taken.

    4. Re:please stop by JeTmAn81 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Do you really need someone to explain the difference between murder and accidental death to you?

      --
      "Me? Lady, I'm your worst nightmare -- a pumpkin with a gun."
    5. Re:please stop by krbvroc1 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      For some laughter is the best medicine. For others humor is a coping mechanism. There was even humor after 9/11.

    6. Re:please stop by Sloppy · · Score: 1
      Do you really need someone to explain the difference between murder and accidental death to you?
      Yes, I need someone to tell me why one is funny and one is not. Or maybe someone can tell me why one is an inherent part of the human condition and one is unnatural. Yes, please explain the difference.
      --
      As copyright owner of this comment, I authorize everyone to defeat any technological measure which limits access to it.
    7. Re:please stop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The 11 minutes past 9 thing is wrong. The first bomb exploded at 8.51am I believe.

    8. Re:please stop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because some people cope with death by cracking jokes. Some people get violent and start breaking things.. other people break down and cry. I'm sure there's other kinds of coping mechanisms. Disclaimer: I'm not a phychiatrist, and my spelling sucks to boot.

      Obviously you aren't the joking type of person. But do those of us a favor who are the joking types and take your "stop laughing this isn't funny" comments and shove it. We're trying to keep from going crazy (either angry or depressed).

    9. Re:please stop by JeTmAn81 · · Score: 1

      Are you under the impression that making fun of people who die in car accidents is a really good idea, too? It isn't.

      --
      "Me? Lady, I'm your worst nightmare -- a pumpkin with a gun."
    10. Re:please stop by Sloppy · · Score: 1

      AC, my old friend, I was the one defending jokes.

      --
      As copyright owner of this comment, I authorize everyone to defeat any technological measure which limits access to it.
  28. Yep. It was those Iranians and Syrians. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm waiting for Fox News and CNN to announce the undisputable connection any moment now.

    It'll be great to add their oil to that which we've already Justly confiscated from Iraq (war reparations).

    Funny thing though, I thought the price would drop when we owned it all, but now Diesel is more than $1.00 per liter in my country, from $0.49l before the crusade. Hmm, strange...

  29. $1 per liter = approx $4 per gallon. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's for Diesel: gasoline is a little over $6 per gallon...

    God Bless America! God Bless President Cheney! God Bless unbridled profiteering by American leaders and their oil industry buddies!

    God help everybody else on the planet.

  30. True about power to kill civilian mobile phones by firestarter · · Score: 1

    The UK police now have special sim cards to enable them to continue talking even if civilian mobile networks are switched off.

    The Madrid bombs were triggered remotely by mobile phones. I think this system is a direct reaction to that threat (and it makes good sense IMHO).

    In this case the decision seems to have been taken not ot use the capability (or to use it in a limited way). You can't get a signal on most London underground lines - so that ruled out the possibility that these bombs were triggered by mobile.

    1. Re:True about power to kill civilian mobile phones by Anonymous+Cowpat · · Score: 2, Informative

      they don't knock the civilian networks off (the police have civilian phones) they make the cells in the effected area stop accepting calls from phones not set up with the ACCOLC system. The idea being that the police, fire birgade, paramedics, doctors etc have these phones, so that the system will let them through.

      --
      FGD 135
    2. Re:True about power to kill civilian mobile phones by Tony+Hoyle · · Score: 1

      It's not about special sim cards, it's special numbers.

      You can switch the mobile number into 'emergency calls only' which means basically everyone not on the approved list gets kicked off.

      This effectively happened anyway.. the network hit capacity, so the only thing that could get through was emergency numbers (since they have priority always and can supercede existing non-emergency calls when congestion is a problem).

  31. FAST market called by firestarter · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The London Stock Exchange called a Fast market, in reaction to the initial high volatility and volume caused by the situation (possibly over this secure channel).

    As a result of the Fast Market call, banks are requested to turn off programmed trading systems. This removes the danger that computer trading triggers will be tripped and cause catastrophic selling - leading to a crash.

    Seems like everything was handled pretty well. The London equity market stabilised quickly, and actually returned to peaks of 2 weeks before within the same day. I'm sure that the reason behind this was a feeling that the attack - although bad - could have been a whole lot worse.

  32. Mod parent up by ZephyrXero · · Score: 1

    Most of us Americans have no clue what's going on with our country. The "news" networks in our country are a joke, but for some reason they all keep believing that we're doing what's good or right, when it's far from it.

    --
    "A truly wise man realizes he knows nothing."
  33. Re:If only black and white were the only colours.. by ZephyrXero · · Score: 1

    I seem to remember it only being 51% our fault... the other 49% were actually aware of the real world.

    --
    "A truly wise man realizes he knows nothing."
  34. Why are they telling us about this "secret" link? by superdude72 · · Score: 1

    It seems that the chief value of such a system is that after a disaster, they can put out a press release letting people know they have it, so everything is under control, no need to panic.

    They might as well get a box, put some flashing lights on it, and broadcast a press release about their TerrorDetect advanced terrorist early warning system (tm). Stops terror in its tracks!

  35. Doh! by mkop · · Score: 1

    You mean the people that have the money actualy talk to each other securely?

  36. Excellent! by crovira · · Score: 2, Informative

    That means that LIBOR (London Inter Bank Offering Rates) could still get through. This is essential for the world economy.

    In case you didn't know, that means that mortgage rates in the 'States could be set.

    In addition to the deals that banks can work out between themselves, the LIBOR rates, apart from eliciting comments on Rense.com about America being nothing more than a branch plant economy to our British overlords, are a fundamental component of the banking rates in the states. (Why do you think that London is so imporant? Its not the food or the beer [Smithwicks excepted]. :-)

    The rates for the mortgage on a shot-gun shack in "Scrote, Arkansas" are set in London.

    That is the beauty of market rates. But the "market" is in London.

    --
    MSBPodcast.com The opinions expressed here are my own. If you don't like 'em... Think up your own stuff.
  37. Now see, that's the problem. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Someone on-air (as in local official) in London said (real-time) they were considering flipping the switch and killing all civilian cell activity.

    You've got to be kidding me. You're right, these people are idiots. If I'm bombing a bus, train, or subway, I'm not going to have some mobile phone activated rig. What if someone dials the wrong number when you turn it on? Oops! Yeah, remote possibility, but it could happen. And of course, they'll find pieces of the phone, find out who bought it, etc, etc. It'll trace back to you. That's just stupid.

    No, just load a bag with a bomb, attach a simple timer, board the bus, leave bag under a seat, then exit the bus. Simple yet perfectly synchronized. If someone notices, they're just going to say "Hey buddy, forgot your bag." You pick it up and depending on how much time you have left, either try again or head to a restroom, and detach the timer. This doesn't require high tech anything.

    What I've found interesting is all of the information they've discussed which has been captured on all of the public cameras. From what they said today during the various press conferences, any repairs they make will include "that many more" cameras to watch for anyone trying to do this again.

    Repairs? What are they going to do, put guns in the cameras? Otherwise, how does a camera stop a real terrorist? It doesn't. It's only going to help determine "who done it" after the fact, if that.

    Hey, here's an idea to put an end to terrorism. How about we stop killing their children. They probably wouldn't feel like blowing shit up if we could manage that.

  38. Re:If only black and white were the only colours.. by Neoprofin · · Score: 0

    Xenophobic immagration laws? We have people trying to grant illegals amnesty and identification. Make it legal for them to get drivers licenses and so on and so forth. I had more problems getting into Canada for the weekend then most people have getting into this country.

  39. Mod Parent Down, -1 Insular by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The standard lazy lament is actually that it's all Tony Blair's fault for his part in the War on Want^H^H^H^HTerror.

  40. Where to get your own... by xxxJonBoyxxx · · Score: 1
    There's a company in Wisconsin called Standard Networks (http://www.standardnetworks.com/) that makes a neat little web-based message system that looks like email to end users, but really stores each message in an AES-encrypted file.

    Check it out here: http://www.standardnetworks.com/uploads/media/MOVE it-DMZ-Secure-Messaging.PDF/

  41. Re:please stop-Sorry Andy, $ > people :( by iamcf13 · · Score: 1

    Sorry Andy,

    money is far more important than people in this world today.... :(

    Just look at the insurance industry:

    1) They reap far more money in premiums than they pay out to cover claims made against them. I have heard that most of the (prime?) real estate in the USA is owned in whole or part by insurance companies.

    2) Their unwilingness to cover any and all forms of 'nuclear devastation' -- it would surely bankrupt them (if not already utterly destroyed by said devastation). I have heard 'horror stories' of hurricaine victims getting dropped/shafted(?) by their insurance companies due to them making a policy claim in the wake of hurricane damage. Eventually, the 'Feds' had to step in to 'make things right'! This proves an industry-wide reluctance to pay insurance claims in the aftermath of even a catastrophic natural event--'act of God' in insurance parlance.

    3) Look at Lloyd's Of London. Those guys will insure just about anything for the right premium payments!

    When you get right down to it, in today's world, the overriding attitude is that people are worthless, a renewable, exploitable resource individually replaceable in nine months or less. How long will it take for the painful memories of the London, England bombings of 2005-07-07 to fade into the mists of obscurity like the similar attacks carried out in Madrid, Spain on 2004-03-11.

    In closing, it is my hope this tragedy will put 'the powers that be' on high alert, seeing how 2005-08-06 is 'right around the corner'....

  42. Re:Good for them??? by tcr · · Score: 1

    You can stop terrorists. Don't give them a good enough reason to attack you.

    So what exactly did the people of Bali do?

    --


    Information wants to be beer.