Slashdot Mirror


China Plans Deep Impact Mission

Comatose51 writes "China is planning its own Deep Impact mission. The goal of the mission, unlike the exploratory NASA project, is to push potential life-ending comets or asteroids away from a collision course with the earth." From the article: " The third nation to launch a man into space has lofty space ambitions that include putting two astronauts into orbit this September and eventually sending up a space station and even a manned mission to the moon."

50 of 286 comments (clear)

  1. Oh, they saw that movie too... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny
    Alternatively:
    The goal of the mission, unlike the exploratory NASA project, is to push potential life-ending comets or asteroids away from a collision course with China and divert them toward Mongolia.
    1. Re:Oh, they saw that movie too... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      To save money the Chinese have decided to combine the first manned mission with the deep impact mission.

  2. China is being very ambitious by DanielMarkham · · Score: 4, Informative

    In addition to the comet mission, they are going to build their fourth space launch center , and they've also announced plans to militarize their space program.
    I wonder, when they finally land someone on the moon, will they say "We came in peace for all mankind"?

    New Star Trek Film Planned by Fans

    1. Re:China is being very ambitious by venicebeach · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Well they are certainly talking ambitiously. But I'll believe it when I see it... From the article:

      "Actually, our country has its own Deep Impact plans, it's just we've never revealed them to the public before," the Beijing News quoted Chinese astronomer Zhao Haibin as saying.

      In other words, oh yes, we were planning to do that the whole time...but of course -

      China still had to overcome technical obstacles before it could send a comet collider into space, Xinhua news agency quoted Huang Chunping, the lead engineer behind sending China's first man into space in '03, as saying

      This is the Xinhua News Agency which according to wikipedia "reports directly to the Communist Party's Propoganda Department".

    2. Re:China is being very ambitious by Aardpig · · Score: 4, Insightful

      and they've also announced plans to militarize their space program.

      What, like the USA did years ago?

      --
      Tubal-Cain smokes the white owl.
    3. Re:China is being very ambitious by Bimo_Dude · · Score: 2, Funny
      I wonder, when they finally land someone on the moon, will they say "We came in peace for all mankind"?

      Nope. They will say, "All your moonbase are belong to us." :)

      --
      "Teleporting Rodents with D-Cell Battery Displacement" theory -- IgnoramusMaximus (692000)
    4. Re:China is being very ambitious by Burning1 · · Score: 3, Funny

      Why wouldn't they have plans?

      People are always asking themselves "what if." The US military has plans for full scale thermo-nuclear war with canada. I have plans to teleport into strange women's bedrooms. Scientists especially tend to plan things out, even if they aren't likely.

      We're all waiting on impetus and technology.

    5. Re:China is being very ambitious by FleaPlus · · Score: 2, Informative

      And the Soviet Union before that... check out the photos of the Polyus weapons platform.

    6. Re:China is being very ambitious by ThreeE · · Score: 2, Informative

      The US has two space programs: one is civilian, one is military. Both are needed.

    7. Re:China is being very ambitious by Veteran · · Score: 3, Informative

      As a contractor who works at JSC, I can assure you that NASA is in charge; neither we nor our companies have any say accept for: "Yes sir". If the contractors are in charge then why did Lockheed, which had been at JSC for more than 40 years, lose the ESCG contract to Jacobs Engineering? Contractors exist because the space agency can get rid of both the companies and the individuals easily; firing a government employee is very difficult.

      Contractors in charge is a ridiculous thing to say. From the inside NASA's biggest problem is that during the space race technical people who knew how to accomplish technical tasks were picked to lead and manage the agency at all levels; now most NASA divisions have "professional managers" who couldn't personally build and fly a model rocket - let alone make critical decisions about the real thing. It is these non technical "professional managers" who are the "NASA cultural problem" you have heard so much about. Such people have been directly responsible for most of NASA's technical disasters.

    8. Re:China is being very ambitious by Burning1 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Because I can already get into the bedrooms of girls I know.

  3. What about sound? by Krankheit · · Score: 2, Funny

    NASA had visual, but I am hoping China can one-up NASA and put a microphone onboard so we can hear the exciting sounds of a space collision. Did George Lucas do this?

    --
    Powered by caffeine and sugar; BSD
    1. Re:What about sound? by MyLongNickName · · Score: 4, Funny

      I, for one, think they should attach a giant nose so they can smell it too.

      In a vaccum, both should be equally useful.

      --
      See my journal for slashdot ID's by year. Mine created in 2005. http://slashdot.org/journal/289875/slashdot-ids-by-year
  4. World killer? by Sancho · · Score: 4, Funny

    All these "deep impact" projects are starting to freak me out. Does the One World Government know something we don't?

    1. Re:World killer? by Sancho · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I guess some people don't know the definition of the word Troll....

      See, it'd be trolling if I suggested that Bush's war with Iraq was merely a distraction to keep the public from knowing about the comet.

    2. Re:World killer? by eno2001 · · Score: 2, Funny

      There is much less likelihood of that happening since it's unlikely that your but (and the rest of your GI tract) is capable of holding even one monkey. Not to mention, monkeys cannot fly. So you would also have yo have monkeys that are bizarrely small and equipped with flying apparatus of some kind thereby doubling the space (flying equipment = 1 monkey in size) required to house monkeys.

      Whereas, it has been scientifically proven that *something* is out there neare Uranus and Neptune causing a gravitational pull that was unexpected. Before NASA started their cover-up story, they mistakenly reported the possibility that this is a tenth planet back in the 80s. Then the one world government made the news sources that reported the story retract it without further explanation. There is only one explanation for all of this: a planet killing planet or comet is coming back this way on it's 4000 year orbit.

      When it returns, the Niburu are expected to invade in order to reclaim their slave race (us). I expect that they will weed out the unexpected mutants and pick the people that will make the best slaves. This means that the U.S. is their primary target since a majority of the population there is well prepared for mind control. This leads many to think that the one world government (that G.W. Bush and Dick Cheney are part of and now Tony Blair has been admitted into the secret cabal)has been in contact with the Niburu and has promised to program their citizenry into willing slaves through the use of Fox television and Channel 4. In exchange, this secret cabal will have their families spared. Just watch The X-Files movie where Chris Carter attempts to inform us about what's happening behind the scenes of our one world government.

      As you can see, there is a lot of evidence proving that Planet X, and domination by the Niburu (formerly referred to as "god" or "gods") will return to Earth. I am confident that Planet X is coming back and this is based on sound science. The crop circles have been a warning from the aliens residing on Earth that we have yet to decipher. They live among us, but as more of an entity rather than beings in disuise. They live within many of us. At night, whilst we sleep, they awaken and cause many of us to lead a second life. Sleep walking is one manifestation of this occurrence. But the ones who are truly successful manage to get people to wake up in the middle of the night and channel the alien consiousness' power at empty fields thereby rendering the crop circles in the ancient language of the Niburu and Sumeria.

      Why do they do this instead of just posting on the internet? Because, much like white explorers of the old days, they consider us to be primitives. They see our technology aswe saw the stone and jawbone tools. Many white explorers would walk up to the native peoples of different lands and attempt to speak english to them. This is no different. There is a barrier to understanding. At this time, the human race is a lot like the people in the movie "The Gods Must Be Crazy". We have appropriated alien technology from Roswell (where do you think Intel got it's chip designs from). One time, I saw a photo of an artifact recovered from Roswell that was essentially a Pentium-like die. But the photo was taken in 1950! So much like the Coke bottle in the movie, we are only using alien technology at a fraction of it's capabilties. If we built a proper chip core based exactly on the Roswell cores (I believe they recovered 16 of these cores), it's likely that we would have a sentient computing system with a telephatic interface.

      It still amazes me how many people there are who choose to remain ignorant of the truth when the evidence is out there. Trying to laugh off the truth by saying "Monkeys COULD fly out of my butt" simply illustrates your fear at accepting the truth. If you have a better explanation for these kinds of things, I'd like to hear it.

      --
      -"...bad old ideas look confusingly fresh when they are packaged as technology" - Jaron Lanier (Digital Maoism on Edge.o
  5. Deep impact data should help the Chinese effort by mikewas · · Score: 4, Insightful
    The Deep Impact mission was to learn about comets' structure. The comet threw up a tremendous amount of debris, much more than was expected.

    It would seem that the data gathered would be critical to any future mission to comets that intended to push a comet off course.

    --

    "Glory is fleeting, but obscurity is forever." --Napoleon Bonaparte
  6. The next step of course by cxreg · · Score: 4, Insightful

    is to find a comet that is actually going to impact Earth...

  7. litigation by Gherald · · Score: 4, Funny

    Ahhh, the advantages of not having a proper modern legal system

    If it was Europe trying to pull this shit, we'd have a second defendant!

  8. I for one... by Serapth · · Score: 4, Funny

    look forward to a nation finally putting a man on the moon, instead of faking it! :)

  9. A Chinese Moon Landing by PrntlUnit27 · · Score: 4, Funny

    What if they don't find a US flag up there?

    1. Re:A Chinese Moon Landing by jolande · · Score: 2, Informative

      True story, I was under the impression that the American flag was still standing up on the moon. But the other week I was reading about the apollo missions and it turns out that the flag fell over by the force of liftoff when they went back into lunar orbit.

  10. The math doesn't look good... by G4from128k · · Score: 4, Interesting

    An estimate of the orbital delta-v for Tempel /Deep Impact suggests a velocity change of only 1 cm/hour (I can't vouch for the math). Assuming we would need to nudge a threatening body by 1/2 the diameter of the Earth (from direct hit to grazing pass-by), we would need to know to hit a Tempel 1-sized body in advance by over 73,000 years. This type of mission would work 10 years in advance for much smaller bodies (say less than 350 m in diameter). Even these estimates assume a perfect strike by the deflecting deep impactor -- a margin of error or the need to push the object several Earth-diameters further reduces the potential for this method.

    Kinetic energy is not the way to go. Deep Impact delivered only about 4.5 kt of TNT. In contrast, a good sized thermonuclear weapon could deliver thousands of times that energy (even taking into account the relatively poor conversion of 100 megatons yield into delta-V).

    --
    Two wrongs don't make a right, but three lefts do.
    1. Re:The math doesn't look good... by iggymanz · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Here's neat link mentioning megatons of yield needed to deflect 1km asteroid by cm/s. here Repeated applications of the more usual 1-5 MT warheads seems more reasonable than the need to invent a 100MT monster. But if the dimensions of the asteroid are of the order of dozens of cubic km then we're probably screwed! 8D

      Just to wax philosophical for a moment, I hear people talk about founding space stations so we "don't have all our eggs in one basket", but if the entire earth gets wiped out does it really matter if we have a couple dozen people in a space station or moon base? nah, who gives a crap at that point, certainly you or I won't....

  11. Astronauts? by gumpish · · Score: 4, Informative

    From the blurb: From the article: "The third nation to launch a man into space has lofty space ambitions that include putting two astronauts into orbit this September and eventually sending up a space station and even a manned mission to the moon."

    I'm pretty sure you mean taikonaut (unless the Chinese are really sending Americans into space...)

    1. Re:Astronauts? by Rangsk · · Score: 3, Informative

      According to this Wikipedia article:
      Taikonaut is sometimes used in English for astronauts from China by Western news media. The term was coined in May 1998 by Chiew Lee Yih from Malaysia, who used it first in newsgroups. Almost simultaneously, Chen Lan coined it for use in the Western media based on the term tàikng (), Chinese for space. In Chinese itself, however, a single term yháng yuán (, "universe navigator") has long been used for astronauts and cosmonauts. The closest term using taikong is a colloquialism tàikng rén (, "space human") which refers to people who have actually been in space. Official English text issued by the Chinese government uses astronaut.

      So I suppose astronaut would be as good a term as any.

      --
      "Don't believe anything you read on the net. Except this. Well, including this, I suppose." --Douglas Adams
  12. You see... by Surazal · · Score: 5, Funny

    China's not happy since they are the fireworks experts. They don't want to be outdone.

    I kid. ;^)

    --
    --- Journals are boring; Go to my web page instead
  13. Which method? by davmoo · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I wonder which way China will go with their visions for space.

    Will they follow through and actually do what they claim.

    Or will they take the US route (which we'll call "Fred") where we talk grand plans and visions...then we cut funding for other projects that are already successfully producing major scientific discovery, and finally we then cut funding even more and adapt 40 year old technology that never lived up to its original expectations in the first place. And then when it fails we propose gigantic new visions we don't intend to follow through on, so that everyone forgets about the failure of the earlier project.

    --
    I want a new quote. One that won't spill. One that don't cost too much. Or come in a pill.
    1. Re:Which method? by davmoo · · Score: 2, Interesting

      It comes from back in the day when the space station was originally proposed. It was a much larger and more useful design, and it was going to be named "Freedom". But as usual, our government was more interested in weapons and such than science, so the design was scaled back *massively* after funding cut after funding cut. This started a popular joke going around that because of the reduction in size of the proposed station, there was no longer room to paint the word "Freedom", so they had to also cut the name down to "Fred".

      "Freedom" instead became the current almost pointless International Space Station (ISS).

      --
      I want a new quote. One that won't spill. One that don't cost too much. Or come in a pill.
    2. Re:Which method? by davmoo · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Mercury and Gemini I'd agree with you without exception.

      Apollo delivered its goals, but was scaled back. There were supposed to have been at least two more flights in the program, and it could have achieved far more than it did.

      Skylab worked, but I don't think it was in the general plans for it to fall out of orbit after only three missions.

      Apollo/Soyuz, yeah, I'd have to agree on that one too.

      The shuttle works, but it has never fully lived up to expectations. Way over budget and late. Original plans called for it to regularly make 10 flights per year or more. Its never come close. Likewise, while its cheaper to operate than one time use rockets like a Saturn, it has never come close to original projections. And finally, this is what was supposed to keep Skylab from falling down.

      ISS was massively scaled down from original plans (reference "Fred" in my first post). Something is regularly breaking down, we're dependant on another country to keep it supplied and get us there and back, its on a scaled-back crew roster now, and NASA regularly talks about the possible need to mothball it for extended periods of time. Successful, probably. But I think "resounding" is stretching it.

      One final thing on ISS. And I tried to find specific times for this, but since Mir was de-orbited its apparently hard to come by accurate information. But from the time of placement of the first and main module of Mir in to orbit until the station was dropped was 15 years. The first and main module of ISS has only been in orbit slightly over 6 years (according to NASA information I just looked at). ISS has been manned for a period of 4 years plus some. I cannot find information right at the moment on the length of time that Mir was manned, but considering at least one mission was longer than a year, I have a hard time believing that ISS has been manned longer than Mir. Can you point me to a site that can confirm that?

      --
      I want a new quote. One that won't spill. One that don't cost too much. Or come in a pill.
  14. Re:stupid reporters by Snarfangel · · Score: 3, Funny

    It was NOT named for the movie, in fact the project was named before the movie was made.

    The next thing you'll claim is that Armageddon isn't a made-up name at all, but based on some old book.

    --
    This tagline is copyrighted material. Please send $10 for an affordable replacement.
  15. Re:What Goes Around by NanoGator · · Score: 4, Insightful

    "With 2B people to feed, China has much more pressing issues that saving the Earth from comets."

    That's the problem, iddn't it? They can't afford to be hit by a comet, either. Well roundedness/diversity can be a good thing. Consider the USA's space program. Suppose it never happened, would the USA be the same for it? Maybe they want to cover their butts and spark a little technological innovation to boot.

    "This project is a cover for military operations in space. Maybe they're researching how to divert a planetoid into the Earth, potentially more powerful than any nuclear weapon."

    Err maybe. The way I see it, though, this sort of weapon has the same drawbacks as a nuclear weapon. It's not like they're going to use it against their enemies without it being traced back to them. If they managed to drop a comet on somebody, from a consequences point of view they'd be in just as much shit as they would be if they had fired a nuclear weapon. Worse, it'd take a hell of a lot longer to get the ball rolling, not to mention the dangerous consequences of a small mistake. What would stop the USA or any other government from responding with nuclear weapons if China pulled a stunt like that? Truth be told, I have trouble imagining that the impact of a comet wouldn't rock their boat, anyway. If it hit the water, for example, well just think about that. If a big enough comet hit to kick a lot of dust into the air, well they wouldn't be fond of that, either. Maybe I'm just incredibly naieve about how useful of weapon a comet diversion would be, but IMHO this theory just seems too far-fetched.

    An alternative explanation is that China's vasteness makes the concept of a comet or asteroidal impact a bit scary. (At least on a statistical level.) Perhaps they're worried about their own territory. They might even be trying to improve their global image. "We're trying to save the planet here!"

    Anyway, I can speculate all day about it. I'm not trying to say you're wrong. I'm just not sure I suspect you're right.

    --
    "Derp de derp."
  16. Of course... by dbolger · · Score: 2, Interesting

    the real irony comes when their first test to see if they can "nudge" a comet accidentally sends the target spiralling towards Earth ;)

  17. Wrong. by lheal · · Score: 5, Insightful

    You're not wrong about China having an ulterior military motive for their space work. A nation (even an Axis of Evil Rogue Nation) has a right to defend its interests against a perceived threat. Of course China has military uses planned for their extraterrestrial technology.

    But you're completely wrong in thinking that we could say or do anything to stop China from doing anything they really want to do. Had we shown "leadership" and pushed for a ban on military uses of space, they wouldn't have listened anyway.

    We will have weapons in space because we have weapons wherever we go. We are a violent, overconsumptive, power-hungry race.

    Get past it. You'll sleep better.

    --
    Raise your children as if you were teaching them to raise your grandchildren, because you are.
  18. Re:China, the new SUPERPOWER(tm)! by wibs · · Score: 2, Informative

    Personally, I think it's just the comunist party making an attempt at trying to look like they are a competent government rather than the pack of stupid greedy thugs that they are.

    What, you mean like every other government in every other country? A close friend of mine has spent almost 10 months of the past two years in China, from what he says the truth about how China handles its citizens lies somewhere between what China or the US would have you believe. Take what you hear from US-gov supplied press reports with a grain of salt.

    There are exceptions, but a general rule of thumb is that the people in power got there because they put a lot of effort into gaining power. I don't care if they're democrats, republicans, communists, or whatever - most are greedy bastards.

    MY GOD, WE HAVE A GAP IN OUR AERSONAL OF GIANT SPACE ROCKS!

    rofl

    --
    If you get nervous, just remember that there are a few billion other people who don't really give a damn.
  19. Re:China, the new SUPERPOWER(tm)! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I hate to break it to you but China's government is a hell of a lot more competent than the Bush dynasty.

    Anyone who pays attention to international economics knows the Chinese government knows what they are doing.

    The Chinese leadership is made of engineers and economists while the American leaders are businessmen and lawyers. Who's the greedy thugs?

  20. Very original idea by Hao+Wu · · Score: 2, Funny

    Only genius of China nation think so clearly for future requirments of Grate Space missions.

    The Nasa needs to play catch up games now, I beleive. (If try the copying of ideas, then perhaps you will find...)

    --
    I suggest you read Slashdot
  21. Instead of "Made in China" by vchoy · · Score: 5, Funny

    Just imagine:

    One big label on earth:

    "Saved By China"

  22. Re:What Goes Around by Zeinfeld · · Score: 3, Insightful
    With 2B people to feed, China has much more pressing issues that saving the Earth from comets. And messing with cometary orbits is too risky for even space programs with decades of cautious experience.

    You illustrate the point of the program precisely, to educate people with reactionary views like your own. China does not want to be seen as a technically and military inferior country that can be pushed around by the worlds last superpower. The population of China is generally estimated to be 1.3B, not 2B.

    They are spending the money on this project for exactly the same reason that JFK launched the moon shot - political prestige translates directly into power. The idea of going to the moon was to spend the USSR into the ground. JFK started the program in 1962, a quarter century later the USSR was kaput.

    For example at the moment there is a sizable faction of the Republican party that spends its time talking about the need to start a trade war with China. Some of them even want to go further and instigate a new cold war. In that type of political environment it makes good sense to invest a few billion dollars pointing out that the economy of China is not stagnant and declining and that it has more than enough capacity to support a military sector that is more than sufficient for national defense.

    According to the CIA world fact book China's economy is worth 7.2 trillion and is growing at 9.1%, the Us economy is worth 11.8 trillion and is growing at 4.4%. At that rate China overtakes the US in 10 years time. That is not even taking acount of the fact that the US economy is mature and the typical growth rates of mature economies are much less than 4%. Plus the US has a massive balance of payments deficit that is only being financed by China buying US bonds.

    So even if the US was to try a cold war strategy at this stage as the neanderthal wing of the GOP would like it is simply too damned late. China has more economic leverage over the US than the US could hope to gain over China.

    The US is currently facing the same problem that hit the British Empire. In the 1920s a bunch of politicians got into power who were really into the whole imperialism thing, they swaggered about holding 'empire days' and such. All the time completely oblivious to the fact that the empire was slipping away and their behaviour was one of the main reasons that it was happening.

    China and India are becoming world powers. The US is not going to be the worlds only super power in the future. That is a good thing if people would only realize it. The US is not going to be able to pursue a unilateral foreign policy, but why on earth does the Bush administration want to?

    --
    Looking for an Information Security student project suggestion?
    Try http://dotcrimeManifesto.com/
  23. That's impossible! by you-nix-boy · · Score: 4, Funny

    After all, nudging a comet with enough accuracy to hit a point on the earth would take unheard of mathematical precision, requiring millions of skilled... oh, wait, never mind...

    --
    --- Pork is not a verb.
  24. Re:What Goes Around by Zeinfeld · · Score: 4, Informative
    One other factoid, population below the poverty line. China 10%, USA 12%.

    That is from the CIA world fact book, admitedly the poverty line definition is probably different. But China does not suffer from mass starvation as many in the US seem to think.

    India is not nearly as well off. 25% below the poverty line and only 3 Trillion in GDP. That could change rapidly however since the economy has been very much damaged by the autarky policies of previous governments that are being unwound.

    --
    Looking for an Information Security student project suggestion?
    Try http://dotcrimeManifesto.com/
  25. Re:What Goes Around by RollTissue · · Score: 2, Insightful
    According to the CIA world fact book China's economy is worth 7.2 trillion and is growing at 9.1%, the Us economy is worth 11.8 trillion and is growing at 4.4%. At that rate China overtakes the US in 10 years time.

    This has been a popular theme for politicians to rally behind for the last 3 decades.

    The fact is, nobody will sustain the growth that they are at for the long term. Eventually, China will even out and start facing the same issues that the US has been working out since the '70's.

    The same applies to India, both nations are starting to get their piece of the global market and when they start to catch up, their economies will change drastically (just like the US's economy has with the upturns and downturns through the 70's 80's and 90's with recessions, gas shortages etc.) This is what is on the horizon for up and coming national players.

    Take a look at China's natural resources and what do they have that the rest of the world needs? (besies rice) They have a heavily 'services' oriented economy. This is prone to severe highs and lows based on the rest of the worlds ability to pay them for their services.

  26. Re:What Goes Around by ppanon · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It decreases time of flight to target. It makes it harder for a ballistic missile defense system like SDI/Star Wars to successfully intercept because you won't have huge friggin ground launch signatures to warn you and give you accurate trajectory estimates, you'll just have much smaller de-orbit burns that make detection and prediction much harder, with a smaller event window in which to do it. It's an inevitable result of the return of the US missile defense project.

    So you're left with a missile defense system that's incapable of defending against a Chinese attack, and also completely useless against terrorists who would deliver a nuke through shipping. Why did you spend those billions again?

    So everybody becomes even more trigger happy as they realize they have less reaction time available than before. Bet that doomsday clock advances a few minutes as a result.

    Stop - Boom, boom, boom - or I'll shoot!

    --
    Laissez lire, et laissez danser; ces deux amusements ne feront jamais de mal au monde. - Voltaire
  27. Actually by Alien54 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Actually, the sneaky thing would be to aim a tiny comet or fragment thereof in such a way as to take out "accidently" an appropriate city of their political enemy. It would work as part of their secret warfare strategy.

    --
    "It is a greater offense to steal men's labor, than their clothes"
  28. International Space Station? by KidSock · · Score: 2

    Why aren't the Chinese getting involved with ISS? Or are they? If not, who's being the stick in the mud - NASA or the Chinese? It seems terribly wasteful to ignore existing infrastructure.

    1. Re:International Space Station? by RoLi · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Well it's because competition actually breeds innovation and causes people to get off their lazy asses.

      The ISS-monopoly on the other hand is cementing the status-quo. Just look at the ISS: A giant monstrosity which seems to be more concerned with luxury for astronauts than anything else.

      We need a new space race, otherwise we will never be able to get off this planet.

      And the pioneers won't be using giant ships with enormous free space like in Star-Trek (or on the ISS). They will be travelling in tiny and efficient capsules and the trip won't be comfortable at all, it will be dangerous and dirty. (Like Apollo was) And there will be casualties.

      Actually the Chinese are currently in a much better position to actually make things happen than the Americans and Europeans combined. Maybe after the Chinese have landed on Moon, the others will get off their chairs. Let's hope so.

  29. More like: by Tablizer · · Score: 2, Funny

    "What a coincidence: it went off target and smashed into Taiwan. One in a million, eh? So sad. Eggrolls anyone?"

  30. Re:What Goes Around by amorsen · · Score: 2, Insightful
    As long as the US is afraid it might get nuked it will stay away from nations that have that capacity and stick to attacking defenseless countries like iraq and afghanistan.

    You are discounting the very real danger of accidental release of nuclear weapons. Both USA and USSR have on several occasions mistaken various events for missile launches. Fortunately there was enough time to figure out that the launches were imaginary or peaceful. Once both SDI and nuclear weapons in space are in place, the likelyhood of mistaking something else for an attack will go up, and the time window before retaliation missiles must be launched is cut short.

    --
    Finally! A year of moderation! Ready for 2019?
  31. Space rocks would be a lousy weapon system.. by Ellis+D.+Tripp · · Score: 2, Informative

    Due to the unknown mass, irregular shape, partial breakup in the atmosphere, and lack of precision control, it would seem to be difficult to target the reentry to a specific CONTINENT, let alone the desired CITY.

    You could end up dropping the thing on yourself as easily as hitting your enemy.

    --
    Remember "News for Nerds, Stuff that Matters"? Help make it a reality again! http://soylentnews.org
  32. Re:What Goes Around by killjoe · · Score: 2, Insightful

    If the US felt that there was a real danger of being accidentally nuked they would aggressively pursue disarmament. Again that's a good thing. Ideally the Chinese would set up space based nukes sitting on top of the US where the missiles could hit withing 10 to 20 seconds and cause instant annhilation of the country.

    If that happened the US would do everything in it's power to get rid of all th enukes in the world. Until then the US feels like it has the capacity to destroy other countries while minimizing the risk to it's own citizens. Therefore there is no reason to disarm.

    I hope and prey that the chinese (or anybody) can achieve the ability to kill all americans within seconds. Until that happens the world will forever be in risk from nuclear weapons.

    --
    evil is as evil does