Slashdot Mirror


Iris Recognition To Take Off

An anonymous reader writes "Looks like iris recognition is about to explode. Turns out, a major patent held by iris recognition leader Iridian is expiring, and that's leading a stampede of start-ups and VCs into this space."

16 of 229 comments (clear)

  1. Patents and innovation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    A patent exipry causing a boom in company startups and innovation - say it ain't so. Are there any legislators out there paying attention to stories like this?

    1. Re:Patents and innovation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      If patents lasted as long as copyright, we wouldn't be discussing this.

    2. Re:Patents and innovation by sonamchauhan · · Score: 4, Interesting

      You're welcome and your civitility is appreciate. My answers/added comments are:

      1) Because it is unfair. And because it deals with "handheld scanners -- the type security patrolmen might use at a stadium or airport."

      2) A monopolist (not evil in itself) convicted of unfair trade practises

      3) No, you support the USPTO granting unfair patents, and gave Bush a bad name by dragging his name into the conversation.

      4)
      4.1) Granting a patent on current and future embodiments of automating an existing manual process is ridiculous.

      4.2) Their first patent does not restrict itself and has absurdly limitless boundaries - it says their "invention be limited not by the specific disclosure herein, but only by the appended claims" - claims like claim 10 below, which are so broad as to cover all current and future embodiments:

      This is CLAIM 10:
      "10. The method of claim 1 in which comparing the obtained image with stored image information comprises deriving a set of descriptors of at least the iris portion of the obtained image and comparing the derived descriptors with stored reference descriptors derived from a previous image for identifying the person."
      This is CLAIM 1:
      "1. A method of identification of a person, comprising:
      storing image information of at least a portion of the iris and pupil of the person's eye;
      illuminating an eye, of an unidentified person having an iris and a pupil;
      obtaining at least one image of at least the same portion of the iris and pupil of the eye of the unidentified person; and
      comparing at least the iris portion of the obtained image with the stored image information to identify the unidentified person."


      4.3) I don't know which ellipsis you speak of

  2. Iris Recognition by Jeet81 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I believe iris recognition takes some time to verfiy the identity of the person as the person has to stand close to a certain point and then the scanner would scan the eye. So this will take more time than pulling your card out and swipping it and walking through the doors. Therefore this tech will only be used in high security area and most of them I guess are already using it.

  3. Really? by Infinityis · · Score: 5, Funny

    I won't believe it until I see it with my own eyes...

    Of course, I'll need some of this new technology to make sure they really are my own eyes.

  4. Wait A Minute... by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 4, Funny

    I thought SGI was going bankrupt. Don't tell me they're come out of bankruptcy with a new version of IRIS. Some companies just never learn how to die properly.

  5. One question by ScrewMaster · · Score: 4, Funny

    Just who is this "Iris" person anyway, and why is she so hard to recognize?

    --
    The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
  6. For those concerned about privacy... by Infinityis · · Score: 5, Funny

    This points to the obvious "next big thing":

    Tinfoil Contact Lenses(TM)

  7. Don't forget... by MarkByers · · Score: 4, Insightful

    1. You can change your password but you can't change your iris.

    2. If you are threatened with violence, you can tell the attacker your password, but would you want to give them your eye?

    --
    I'll probably be modded down for this...
  8. exploding iris by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny
    Looks like iris recognition is about to explode
    Please don't mention iris - or anything to do with eyes - in the same sentence as "explode". Some of us are squeamish.
  9. Re:You've gotta admit... by Ismilar · · Score: 4, Insightful

    "Companies will not invest in the necessary R&D without some guarantee of exclusivity for some period of time."

    Umm... did you even read article, or even the Slashdot blurb? The entire thing is /about/ companies being set to invest money in iris scanning technology and research due to the patent being removed. These companies would have done so long ago had there been no patent.

    The article even suggests that the reason that iris scanners aren't as common as fingerprint or other scanners could be because of the patents that the single company holds.

  10. Iris vs Retina by vossman77 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Are we talking Iris or Retina here?

    Because I've never heard of using the Iris and don't know anything about its uniqueness. Where the retina is easily scanned and heavily researched.

    Anybody know more? or is this a typo?

    1. Re:Iris vs Retina by kaiser423 · · Score: 4, Informative

      The iris is much more unique (I believe it has the highest amount of uniqueness in any biometric system), and I believe they've come up with some very compact and efficient schemes for its use. I remember when I looked back at various biometric technology about 3 years ago, iris scanning was the clear winner barring this patent nonsense.

  11. Re:You've gotta admit... by (negative+video) · · Score: 4, Insightful
    The entire thing is /about/ companies being set to invest money in iris scanning technology and research due to the patent being removed. These companies would have done so long ago had there been no patent.
    They're wrong. This is about the new opportunities for feeding at the Homeland Security trough, which by pure coincidence happens to be at about the time the patent expires.
  12. Reminds me of a joke... by MacDork · · Score: 4, Funny
    This points to the obvious "next big thing":

    The "next big thing" eh? That reminds me of a joke =)

    An anatomy professor is quizzing his students one session when he calls on Suzy with question, "Suzy, what part of the body has the ability to expand to six times its normal size and under what conditions?" Suzy indignantly replies, "Professor! How dare you ask me such a thing, and in front of the entire class no less! I assure you my parents will be hearing about this incident, and you will no doubt have to answer to someone for it!" The professors tells her she may sit down and then asks Emily the same question. Emily replies "The iris. In the dark." The professor continues, "That is correct Emily, you may be seated. Suzy, your answer tells me three things. 1) You have not studied your lessons, 2) You have a dirty mind, and 3) You will be very disappointed one day."

    ;-)

  13. Re:You've gotta admit... by iminplaya · · Score: 4, Insightful

    You neglect to recognize the fact that the technology would never have been developed without the patent.

    That's a load of bull. If somebody needs an iris scanner, they will make one...with or without the damn patent. That's something that the IP drones won't ever admit....That something just might arise from necessity...not always exclusivity. It has been proven once again that IP law promotes speculation.

    --
    What?