Slashdot Mirror


IGN Interviews Natalie Portman

feller writes "IGN FilmForce has posted an interview with Natalie Portman from yesterday's Comic Con regarding her new film, V For Vendetta (written by Andy and Larry Wachowski, creators of The Matrix trilogy) and also covering everything from misguided fans, to what merits the use of violence, to Portman's own opinions about graphic novels. From the interview: 'Most of the Q&A session was dominated with questions for Natalie Portman, the star of the film. While the questions leveled at her ranged from weird to repetitive, one confused young man asked if starring in movies like Mighty Ducks was different than starring in films like V for Vendetta. Problem is, Ms. Portman never starred in Mighty Ducks. '"

22 of 256 comments (clear)

  1. Hot grits? by aussie_a · · Score: 4, Funny

    Nothing for you to see here. Please move along.

    Damn! I was hoping for some hot grits too!

    1. Re:hot grits? by ndogg · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I think I might know who the original hot grits guy was, sort of, possibly.

      I used to frequent a site called LinuxNewbie.org back when it was still under the watchful guidance of a guy who went by the pseudonym of Sensei. I remember there being a member called Craig (I think) who posted these zany pictures all the time, and one of them was a Photoshopped picture of Natalie Portman as a statue. People commented on his amazing petrification skills. I think that he may have been the original hot grits troll.

      Anyway, take that with a grain of salt because I'm not absolutely certain. It's mostly speculation.

      --
      // file: mice.h
      #include "frickin_lasers.h"
  2. news for nerds? by ErichTheWebGuy · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I really thought this was a "news for nerds, stuff that maters" site... I would wager that the majority of the rest of the Slashdot readership is asking themselves the same thing I am:

    WHO THE FUCK CARES?

    If I wanted to see fluff garbage from some Hollywood celeb trash, I would turn on the E! channel, like the wife does every 20 minutes... Now I gota see it on Slashdot. Damn!

    --
    bash: rtfm: command not found
    1. Re:news for nerds? by ErichTheWebGuy · · Score: 5, Funny

      Hey, if this isn't news for horny nerds, I don't know what would.

      It is also apparently news for people with little or no language skills :) *ducks*

      --
      bash: rtfm: command not found
    2. Re:news for nerds? by 91degrees · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It's Natalie Portman, man! Have you no sense of history?

      That, Hot Grits, and Beowulf clusters are the only things that matter!

    3. Re:news for nerds? by Vermifax · · Score: 4, Informative

      What made you think this was an IT news site.

      Its not, never was and never was meant to be.

      Go read the faq.

      --

      Vermifax

      Logout
    4. Re:news for nerds? by slashdot.org · · Score: 3, Insightful

      If you don't care, don't read and don't post. Very easy, very simple.

      I disagree. Posting comments like that is the easiest and arguably the best way for readers to indicate that they don't like the direction in which a site like /. is heading. (provided of course the editors ever actually read comments...)

      I got a similar reply as yours to a comment I placed about the 'Bruce Campbell' story.

      Of course I don't have to read that article nor this one. But it seems fair to bitch about it when a place you frequent for a certain type of information seems to take a weird turn and start reporting on stuff that you really don't care about.

      The comment system is specifically designed to moderate comments that aren't appreciated, and the OP got mod'd +5, so obviously (s)he is not the only one feeling that way.

      In other words; I appreciate a lot of stuff that gets posted on /. and I really would like to continue reading it. But without trying to sound too dramatic, between these type of stories, the dupes and the stories that are rediculously biased and/or plain flamebait, I'm starting to wonder what's happening to good ole /.

      I mean, you gotta honestly wonder if Taco (& the others) are really actively working on this site anymore.

    5. Re:news for nerds? by ozmanjusri · · Score: 3, Funny

      *ducks*

      If you RTFA, you'll find ducks are specifically referred to as NOT being relevant. Not even mighty ones.

      --
      "I've got more toys than Teruhisa Kitahara."
    6. Re:news for nerds? by jayloden · · Score: 4, Insightful

      While I understand where you are coming from, I think you - and the parent - are missing a key point.

      Natalie Portman starred in the new Star Wars movies and thousands of geeks (including a lot here on /.) have a huge crush on her.

      Bruce Campbell is the star of such geek classics as Evil Dead (Army of Darkness).

      So yes, you're right, Hollywood celebrities are on /. - but they're celebrities that lots of us geeks are familiar with and fans of. I'd argue that it does count as "news for (some) nerds", "stuff that matters (to some)".

  3. Bring it on by ottffssent · · Score: 5, Funny

    Hot grits and all. We can take it. Let's hear from the old-school trolls.

    Come on, now's your chance. It's on-topic, even!

    I want to wake up this morning with 50 hot grits replies to this comment. I know you can do it, guys.

    Bring it on!

  4. Writers of the Matrix? by aussie_a · · Score: 4, Interesting

    written by Andy and Larry Wachowski, creators of The Matrix trilogy

    More like the plagarisers of the matrix.

    I should clarify that. I believe they did write the Matrix 2 and 3. But I believe Sophia Stewart's claim that they stole her idea (especially for the first movie). The second and third movies are so pathetic, that it's obvious to anyone who has seen the movies that they weren't written by the same people.

    1. Re:Writers of the Matrix? by incom · · Score: 3, Insightful
      "The case also targets the producers of the Terminator franchise."

      With the date difference between the matrix and the terminator, I'd say she just wrote a script about governing computer mainframes and machines in the 70's, submitted it to a bunch of people, noticed some story similarities, and obsessively thought they stole her work...lawyers...profit!!!
      --
      True genius is grasping a situation like a peice of fruit, and peircing it just right so that it drains dry.
  5. Lovely IGN by aaron_ds · · Score: 5, Funny

    I'm so happy that the International Grits Network is interviewing its biggest star!

  6. Re:Since theres finally a topic on N. Portman... by Recovering+Hater · · Score: 5, Informative

    Because you asked: The "hot grits" and Natalie Portman goes back a little ways on /. It's an old troll and here is a wikipedia link explaining it better than I could. Have fun reading all about weird fetishes. :) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Slashdot_trolling_phe nomena#Hot_grits.2FNatalie_Portman

    --
    My humor is probably your flamebait
  7. Alan Moore didn't like this movie by Dionysus · · Score: 4, Informative

    Usually, Alan Moore, who wrote the graphic novels, doesn't comment on the quality of the movies that are made based on his stories. This is the first movie he actually slammed, and the reason we won't see any more Hollywood movies based on his stories (nor will he work with DC Comics again)

    source

    --
    Je ne parle pas francais.
    1. Re:Alan Moore didn't like this movie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Did you even read the article you linked to? Alan Moore doesn't want to be associated with that movie because they attempted to use his name as a selling point for the movie. He hasn't even seen the movie, let alone have an opinion on it.

      Granted, I haven't got high hopes for V. I don't see a movie about the violent overthrowing of a totalitarian Western government going over too well in this political climate. Might be too close to comfort for some producers.

  8. NATALIE PORTMAN NAKED AND PETRIFIED by spaceorb · · Score: 4, Funny

    What, no one remembers this line?

  9. You guys are behind the times by mtrisk · · Score: 3, Funny

    It's all about Dakota Fanning now.

    Sadly, I think she's the same age Natalie Portman was when she first attracted a following...

    --

    Without a proper flamewar, Anonymous was undecided on what shell to run.
  10. I sense a disturbance in the Force... by Weaselmancer · · Score: 4, Funny

    ...it's as if a million kittens cried out in terror and were suddenly silenced.

    --
    Weaselmancer
    rediculous.
  11. Re:Natalie Who? by antic · · Score: 3, Insightful


    Have you seen Closer? Not a bad film. Garden State is decent too.

    --
    'Thats they exact same thing a banana wrench monkey.'
  12. Re:Hyper-intellectual writing? by 91degrees · · Score: 4, Insightful

    No offense to Portman, but have I been reading wrong graphic novels?

    Dunno. Have you read V for Vendetta? There are a lot of historical and literary references ranging from Homer and Shakespeare to the Rolling Stones. Maybe Hyper-intellectual is a bit of an exaggeration, but they're certainly intellectual.

    Alan Moore is quite clearly trying to turn the comic book into a recognised an artform in its own right.

  13. evidence that the same person(s) wrote all three by MegaFur · · Score: 3, Insightful

    (I admit the "evidence" that I present in a moment is rather weak, but then I also think the claims made by this Sophia person are extremely, deeply stupid. IMHO, the idea that she originally created scripts with material used for both the Matrix and Terminator is a typically pathetic urban legend. Just like aligators live in the sewers or that NASA didn't send missions to the moon.)

    Evidence (weakly--really more like hearsay, but at least it's someone I consider reliable): In the first half of this vmyths article, Rob Rosenberger claims to have been asked to serve as technical advisor for the Matrix.

    The studio sent him materials describing the plot of the movie. When he went to the theater and saw the Matrix, it didn't end like he thought it would. Later, after finding out what was in store for Matrix: Reloaded, he realized the reason the first movie hadn't ended like he'd expected was because the studio materials the studio had sent him had been used in the making of all three movies.

    ------------

    I really don't think Matrix 2 and 3 are so different from the first one. What makes them seem so different is that the first film had a miraculous revelation--that the world we thought was real isn't. The 1st film spent time exploring this notion and let us in on the whole thing slowly. Unfortunately, once the concept of The Matrix had been established, the not-so-bright Wachowski brothers had no new revelations to top it. This happens frequently. I see many, many, many movies, indeed stories in general, that start out with a lot of promise, but are ultimately not able to follow through when it comes around to the middle and especially the end. This is because it's the mystery that survives, not the explanation. To put that another way: it's much easier to ask a thought provoking and inspiring "what if?" question than it is to come up with an equally profound, deeply meaningful answer. 42.

    After the first movie had been seen, but before the 2nd or 3rd movies came out, people had a lot of time (waaay too much time) to build up naive ideas about what direction the trilogy would eventually take. Fan expectations rose ever higher, and it's no surprise that the eventual conclusion could not live up to those (unrealistic) expectations.

    Please go back and watch The Matrx (#1) again sometime--try to throw away all those ideas about what you thought it was supposed to mean and just watch the thing--I think you'll find it's not quite so brilliant as you may have led yourself to believe.

    (P.S. Hope I didn't flame--if so, I didn't mean to, I'm just opinionated.)
    --
    Furry cows moo and decompress.