Slashdot Mirror


Win2000 Still Performs on 8-year-old Hardware

Daniel Iversen writes "Still 95% compatible with Windows XP, The Windows 2000 OS still runs very well on very old hardware - hardware with low specs it was never even meant to run on (tech setup guide - not a review). The broad question is, does the fact that you can remain compatible with today's applications and data on hardware that is almost a decade old, impede PC sales?"

21 of 688 comments (clear)

  1. That's bullshit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny
    Everybody knows Microsoft makes each iteration of their software incompatible with the previous in order to force upgrades.

    I've read it here on Slashdot dozens of times.

  2. The Answer Is... by lucabrasi999 · · Score: 4, Funny
    The broad question is, does the fact that you can remain compatible with today's applications and data on hardware that is almost a decade old, impede PC sales?"

    No! I mean, Yes! Wait....No!

    1. Re:The Answer Is... by wo1verin3 · · Score: 3, Funny

      Are you a consultant?

      No but I play one on TV.

  3. What the heck? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    A slashdot article that praises the durability of a microsoft product? Is the world coming to an end?

    *looks outside*

    Four horsemen of the apocalypse... check! Carry on then...

  4. Obligatory... by utopicillusion · · Score: 4, Funny

    Well, Linux runs well on older hardware too. Infact, the older...the better!

    Btw, Linux also runs on toasters, coffee machines, ipod's etc.

    1. Re:Obligatory... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Toasters? You're thinking of NetBSD.

    2. Re:Obligatory... by Gzip+Christ · · Score: 5, Funny
      Btw, Linux also runs on toasters, coffee machines, ipod's etc.
      Bah! Linux will never be more than a niche player in the toaster market because it is offers too many choices and is therefore too confusing for the drooling masses. Do you think Joe Six Pack cares whether his toast is toasted in a light, medium, or high manner? No! These dizzying array of options will only serve to turn him off to Linux. What he wants is the friendly, animated Toasty(TM) avatar that knows how toast is to be made.
    3. Re:Obligatory... by mOdQuArK! · · Score: 4, Funny
      Do you think Joe Six Pack cares whether his toast is toasted in a light, medium, or high manner?

      You're not even close to the options available - Linux-enabled toasters allow you to toast to 32-bit resolution of doneness, and with the right loadable kernel module, also allow you to toast grayscale images from all supported image formats (BMP, JPG, GIF, PNG, TIFF, PostScript, etc) directly on your toast. (They're waiting for the toaster manufacturers to support inkjet heads with edible color ink before allowing color image files).

      Planned further enhancements include autoadjustment for type of toast being used (requiring an internal heat-resistant CCD camera to examine the pattern of the toast surface), but right now you have to specify one of the 64 predefined keywords indicating toast pattern in the toaster's /etc/toasttype.conf file.

      Oh wait, you were talking about Joe Sixpack. Well, just show him the feature which autoselects a random image from his extensive porn collection - I'm sure he'll see the benefits of open-source then.

      P.S. I'm not kidding about the toaster display device, although I doubt it's running Linux :-)

  5. I just use my turbo button! by Static-MT · · Score: 5, Funny

    Whenever I need a little extra juice for a new fangled Win2k app I just hit my turbo button. I should get a few more good years out of this old PC...

    1. Re:I just use my turbo button! by FauxPasIII · · Score: 5, Funny

      You can't hold Turbo down, it's for short boosts!

      --
      25% Funny, 25% Insightful, 25% Informative, 25% Troll
  6. WTF? by illtron · · Score: 2, Funny

    My employer thankfully just bought us new 3.2 GHz PCs to replace our 1 GHz machines with Win 2K from 2001.

    Screw compatible, I need to get my work done today. Those old PCs were painfully slow running Win2K. Even just simple resizing of photos in Photoshop was asking a lot.

    Combine that with the fact that the interface on XP is still inconsistent crap compared to OS X, and things still take too long to accomplish.

    --
    Slashdot: 24 hours behind every other site or your money back!
  7. Re:Making Up Lost Ground by TPIRman · · Score: 3, Funny

    Wow. Whoever modded this "Interesting" reeeeeeeeally thinks Microsoft is evil.

    "Microsoft is encouraging people to throw away computers, huh? [stroking chin] Interesting... but how does this relate to their involvement in the JFK assassination? More research is needed..."

  8. 5 yr old software on 8 yr old hardware!?!?!?!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Now there's a stretch.

  9. Re:So what? by Eric+Giguere · · Score: 2, Funny

    so what purpose does the article serve, other than the rather mediocre instructional value?

    It's a safety valve to ensure that the Slashdot signal-to-noise ratio remains constant.

    Eric
    Find out why I'm mad about click fraud
  10. involvement in the JFK assassination? by Simonetta · · Score: 4, Funny

    "Microsoft is encouraging people to throw away computers, huh? [stroking chin] Interesting... but how does this relate to their involvement in the JFK assassination? More research is needed..."

    The Warren Commission had to get rid of many megabytes of data related to the investigation of the assassination for fear that future researchers using advanced artificial intelligence algorythms (cool, two root Arabic words in the same English sentence) would uncover the grand conspiracy.

    They turned to a 'boy genius' 9-year-old computer whiz living in a middle-class suburb in Seattle. No one would believe that a boy would be able to accomplish this task, and so the deed went completely unnoticed. Twenty years later, huge government contracts went secretly to the now-grown-up whiz's little company (along with the services of the government's most advanvanced programmer's who were able to the boy's hopeless operating system into near working condition).

    So there!

  11. Well He|| I'm not even 95% compatible by BrentRJones · · Score: 2, Funny

    with old Windows hardware!

    --
    Help end the use of Sigs. Tomorrow
  12. Re:NO by Charles+W+Griswold · · Score: 2, Funny

    News flash! MS-DOS still performs on 20-year-old hardware. Film at 11:00.

    And hey, DOS is somewhat compatable with WinXP. DoomII will run on either system. :-)

    --
    "Those who are too smart to engage in politics are punished by being governed by those who are dumber" -- Plato
  13. Re:Windows Server 2003 is the new Windows 2000 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    " The lowest price I found for Windows Server 2003 was around $250 (USD) vs. about $80 for Windows 2000."

    really? you must not be looking too hard. i found win2k for about $0 (www.mininova.org) and 2k3 for the same price!

    acording to my comparison, the difference is $0!! so it doesnt really matter which one you choose

  14. Re:Mod me "obvious" but... by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 2, Funny

    I don't think today's typical applications would run too well on 8-year-old hardware.

    I recently had to compact a 2GB .pst file for a Client on his 733MHz Toshiba Laptop. Outlook 2002. 8 hours.

    Show me the 75MHz Pentium.

    --
    My God, it's Full of Source!
    OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
  15. Re:Duh by computechnica · · Score: 2, Funny

    I look in
    D:\pictures\2005\0510-vacation pics\
    it is right after
    D:\pictures\2005\0501-birthday pics\
    you do not need a database to organize your digital stuff, just a little thought ahead of time.8^)

  16. Punchline? by Niello · · Score: 2, Funny

    "Win2000 Still Performs on 8-year-old Hardware"

    It sounds like a punchline to a bad Michael Jackson joke.

    --
    I give men fish.