Slashdot Mirror


Spyware Removal: Drop PC in Dumpster

morganx writes "The New York Times is reporting that some users prefer throwing out their PCs and buying new ones to actually removing their spyware. Does this mean lots of free hardware for the dumpster-divers among us?"

50 of 705 comments (clear)

  1. Cheaper? by fembots · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I wonder why it is cheaper to buy a new $400 PC than paying top rate of, say $100 per machine, to get someone to insert the recovery CD and get everything back to factory defaults.

    I find people disposing affected PCs highly irresponsible. Would someone think of those homeless children who dumpster-dived and brought home (or somewhere whatever) such PC? It's like throwing out old smoke alarm with perfectly good Uranium bits inside, someone's going to get hurt.

    The friendly article mentioned that "people are increasingly unwilling to take out their 'software tweezers' to clean their machines", maybe it's time for manufacturers to install a HardReset button (like in a PDA) with a 1 GB ReadOnly Flash drive, which resets everything back to factory.

    1. Re:Cheaper? by emidln · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I think it's pretty damn difficult. As a coder and techie, I cannot figure out how to install Windows XP on my only computer capable of running it. Windows just blue-screens while trying to format the hard drive. I assume it needs drivers for my SATA chipset, since my computer is newer than XP SP2, but my PC doesn't have a floppy drive, space for a floppy drive, or a power cable for a floppy drive. I'm tempted to read up on what kind of power a floppy takes and wire a floppy drive up to an external power source and connect it to the fdc (mobo supports the floppy, power supply doesn't). Oh, and Windows will not treat my usb floppy drive as an A: drive during the install, which is the only place where it will accept drivers from.

    2. Re:Cheaper? by simcop2387 · · Score: 3, Informative

      it takes the exact same power as the other drives, though it'd be prudent to look up which order they are, i don't have them memorized

    3. Re:Cheaper? by B'Trey · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I see. And throwing out the PC and buying a new one solves this problem exactly how?

      --

      "The legitimate powers of government extend only to such acts as are injurious to others." Thomas Jefferson.

    4. Re:Cheaper? by JanneM · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I wonder why it is cheaper to buy a new $400 PC than paying top rate of, say $100 per machine, to get someone to insert the recovery CD and get everything back to factory defaults.

      Rather, it's either pay $100 to get the same two-year old machine back, complete with scuffed exterior, ugly/dirty keyboard, jerky mouse and, lately, a worrying fan noise; or for an additional $300 get a brand-new faster PC with the latest OS, more memory and bigger drive.

      Not a bad deal.

      --
      Trust the Computer. The Computer is your friend.
    5. Re:Cheaper? by Golias · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I'm sure everybody who replied was just trying to be helpful regarding your Windows install, but they managed to prove your point quite well. A typical non-techie hearing all that advice would be utterly lost and baffled.

      --

      Information wants to be anthropomorphized.

    6. Re:Cheaper? by inode_buddha · · Score: 5, Insightful

      And the *vast majority* of people using PC's will actually do any of the above, if they even RTFM that far. Corporate use is a different ballgame. Yeah, right. Most users I know can't be arsed to read the comic book about how to plug in a monitor. Posters are no good either. It should just "plug into a wall and just work". Well, they wanted to buy a toaster, and so they got sold on toasters. Too bad computers are a bit more complex that toasters, and of course the manufacturers and devels have no interest in changing this. Now, we have landfills full of toasters. Yeah, I'm *pissed* in case you haven't figured it out yet. After all, do you see people expecting to buy and use a car with zero training, no licence or maintenance? Why do they apply a different standard to computers?

      --
      C|N>K
    7. Re:Cheaper? by cbiltcliffe · · Score: 3, Interesting

      And how the hell do the "unreplacable" programs get transferred from their old spyware-infested piece of crap to their new $299 piece of crap eMachine?

      The same problem still exists.

      --
      "City hall" in German is "Rathaus" Kinda explains a few things......
    8. Re:Cheaper? by Agent__Smith · · Score: 5, Funny

      "After all, do you see people expecting to buy and use a car with zero training, no licence or maintenance? Why do they apply a different standard to computers?"

      Ever heard of a MAC?

      --
      "It seems that we are at the age where life stops giving us things, and starts taking them away..." Indiana Jones
    9. Re:Cheaper? by Jasin+Natael · · Score: 3, Insightful
      What world are you living in? .... Floppies are utterly disposable. Pass them out like candy and don't care if they come back.

      What world are YOU living in? Pass out a URL with a directory- or file-specific password, save yourself the time and expense of creating the floppies, and then nobody throws anything away.

      Jasin Natael
      --
      True science means that when you re-evaluate the evidence, you re-evaluate your faith.
  2. Dupe Removal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    Drop timothy in the dumpster... along with Zonk, Taco, etc.

    1. Re:Dupe Removal by Rei · · Score: 5, Funny

      On the first Dupe of Monday, Timothy gave to me
      People trashing spywared PCs

      On the second Dupe of Monday, Timothy gave to me
      Old computer booklets
      And people trashing spywared PCs ...

      --
      Point of interest. Offering to shoot us might not work so well as an incentive as you might imagine.
    2. Re:Dupe Removal by someonewhois · · Score: 5, Funny

      I'm waiting for the day that there's a slashdot article that only links to another slashdot article.

    3. Re:Dupe Removal by qewl · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I'm completely convinced all the dupes and extended mysterious future posts(Not to mention increase paid subscriptions) are merely to increase page views and therefore site reloads to increase revenue. There's just no way the editors could post so many dupes within hours by mistake.

      --

      (\_/)
      (O.o) This is Bunny. (> <)
    4. Re:Dupe Removal by Linus+Torvaalds · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Have you forgotten the age-old maxim? Do not ascribe to greed that which can be readily explained by sheer idiocy.

    5. Re:Dupe Removal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      12 first post's a milking
      11dupe stories dancing
      10 google articles singing
      9 M$bashing threads
      8 Karma whores
      7 hello.jpg's
      8. KDE vs. Gnome flamewars
      5 roland pipsquelle slashvertisments
      4 netcraft confirms BSD is dead posts
      3 build your self something you could buy for 1/3 the cost stories
      2. trolls a prancing
      a cmdr taco eating a burrito in a lemon tree

    6. Re:Dupe Removal by clem · · Score: 5, Funny

      Don't worry, I have a feeling we'll be seeing it again.

      --
      Your courageous and selfless spelling corrections have made me a better person.
  3. Fool me once.... by BWJones · · Score: 5, Interesting

    It just boggles the mind that people would throw out a Windows machine and then replace it with another! Windows machine which is immediately susceptible and commonly infected within twenty minutes or so of being re-connected to the Internet. This happens often even before you have time to install updates. The old fool me once, fool me twice adage comes to mind.

    The smarter move would be to migrate to a system that is less affected by worms/virus/security issues. For the vast majority, I would think that system would be OS X. But hey, that's just me. If your time is that valuable that you would simply replace your system rather than wiping it and reinstalling the OS, you think that you would either be smart enough to think different. Of course clicking on the referenced article makes you sit through an ad for Dell unless you dismiss the ad, so what does that mean? :-) Interestingly in the linked article, Dr. Wong does replace her HP system with a Powerbook. This has been our experience as well. We have replaced most of our Windows based systems with Macs running OS X leaving our Windows systems headless and sitting behind a Macintosh and a firewall with respect to the Internet. For grad student systems, giving them a Mac is the best possible solution. They can download all the software they want, surf the web and write their email all on the same system they use for their data analysis without worry and I'm not getting calls or visits to my office saying "Ummmmmmm. I think my system is infected" Time devoted to troubleshooting has gone to essentially nothing. Additionally, the last meeting I had down in our computer science department revealed that a good portion of the faculty were also switching from Windows/Linux/SGI to OS X. That was encouraging for a whole lot of reasons.

    --
    Visit Jonesblog and say hello.
    1. Re:Fool me once.... by Linus+Torvaalds · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It just boggles the mind that people would throw out a Windows machine and then replace it with another! Windows machine which is immediately susceptible and commonly infected within twenty minutes or so of being re-connected to the Internet.

      The smarter move would be to migrate to a system that is less affected by worms/virus/security issues.

      The majority of people have only been exposed to Windows. They think computers simply wear out. They don't see it as getting infected over and over again by dozens of worms, they see it as "oh well, computer's worn out, better replace it".

      In that context, it's perfectly reasonable to go and get something similar to what they already had. They don't think anything happening is wrong. They think this is normal.

      Until something happens to teach the average person that this isn't right and can be avoided by switching to something like Mac OS X, this will carry on happening. I have no idea what that something is. Maybe a virus that forces the person to read an explanation of the issues before it gives access of the computer back or something? I dunno.

  4. The Dupes by kensai · · Score: 3, Informative

    And the dupes they just keep a coming.

  5. Yeah. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    I'm typing this from a dumpster right now. Thank you, spyware.

  6. Re:Aside from the fact that this is a dupe by Mr2001 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Do you really think the kind of person who (1) lets his PC fill up with spyware, then (2) chooses to spend $500 on a new PC instead of spending a couple hours cleaning it out, is going to want to learn Linux?

    "OMG WTF happened to My Computer? Where's Internet Explorer? Why do I have to have a password?"

    --
    Visual IRC: Fast. Powerful. Free.
  7. Do the Slashdot editors read? by cytoman · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I'm quite shocked to see so many dupes posted all the time. Do the editors scan the stories being posted, at all? They seem to be so unaware of what is already posted... the worst cases being dupes occuring on the same day (not this story).

    Seriously, I think that given that Slashdot has become so big in terms of users, the editors need to be more serious about making sure dupes don't happen... if the editors are too busy, appoint a dupe editor who will catch the dupes before they are posted. All it requires is for the dupe editor to do a search on Slashdot to see if a story has already been posted...

    1. Re:Do the Slashdot editors read? by garcia · · Score: 5, Interesting

      They have several... They are called "Subscribers". I have done by job multiple times and been thanked by the editors via e-mail at least a handful of times... Yet there have been just as many (if not more) times that I have submitted the story as being duped and it has been ignored.

      So, we are paying to do their jobs *and* we are being ignored.

      It's almost as good as being a Union employee! :)

  8. Whoa! It's like, Saturday, all over again! by Monte · · Score: 4, Interesting

    And I emailed the "editor" telling them it was a dupe a good 10 minutes before it went live.

    Hello? [thump thump thump] Is this mic on? Come in, Rangoon...

    1. Re:Whoa! It's like, Saturday, all over again! by callipygian-showsyst · · Score: 5, Interesting

      who's the greater fool? The editor (who already made millions of dot-com dollars from /. and doesn't have to care)? Or you who paid for a subscription so you can see dupes early?

    2. Re:Whoa! It's like, Saturday, all over again! by Monte · · Score: 4, Interesting

      The greatest fool is one who re-ups his subscription in light of this.

      Which I won't.

  9. It's not uranium in your smoke detector... by PornMaster · · Score: 5, Informative

    It's Americium-241.

    For more info on americium, see: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Americium

  10. ObQuirk! by overshoot · · Score: 4, Funny
    I wonder why it is cheaper to buy a new $400 PC than paying top rate of, say $100 per machine, to get someone to insert the recovery CD and get everything back to factory defaults.

    Objection, Your Honor! Assumes digital media not in evidence!

    Last I heard, MS was prohibiting OEMs from shipping recovery CDs. That hard drive is all you get.

    --
    Lacking <sarcasm> tags, /. substitutes moderation as "Troll."
    1. Re:ObQuirk! by ocelotbob · · Score: 5, Informative

      They can't ship an OEM copy of XP; if they ship a CD, which most makers do, they have to ship a recovery disc locked to that model of computer.

      --

      Marxism is the opiate of dumbasses

  11. It is not just "people" by geoswan · · Score: 3, Interesting
    It is not just "people". The article says that Tucker, the internet executive who said he bought a new machine, and threw out his old one, because getting rid of the spyware was too difficult, has a PhD in Computer Science.

    Ordinary people getting frustrated is one thing. They lack the right skills. A PhD in computer science is a whole other question.

    1. Re:It is not just "people" by frenchs · · Score: 4, Insightful
      I can't think of a better way to say it, so I'll just quote Edsger.
      "Computer Science is no more about computers than astronomy is about telescopes."

      E W Dijkstra
  12. Re:Aside from the fact that this is a dupe by einhverfr · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I have several customers who have migrated to Linux for similar reasons. They are all beginner consumers.

    The problem largely is that tech support people treat consumers as idiots incapabile of learning the system. I usually start by explaining spyware, how it gets on your computer, how to avoid it/prevent it, etc. Then if it continues, I start suggesting Linux. I show them via a demo system how easy it is to use, and they are usually sold on the idea pretty quickly.

    Computers aren't that hard to understand if we dispense with the tech talk and actually focus on communicating with the consumers.

    --

    LedgerSMB: Open source Accounting/ERP
  13. Re:Premium subscription service by Monte · · Score: 4, Informative

    Is one of the benefits of being a Slashdot subscriber NOT having to see duplicate stories on the front page?

    As a subscriber I can answer this with an authoritive "no fscking way".

    You do get to see articles before they "go live" to the hoi-polloi, and you can even e-mail the editor if you think there's a problem with the article (say, if you know it's a dupe from about 48 hours ago).

    You can see for yourself just how well this all works out.

  14. Cheap hardware makes for strange support options. by wernst · · Score: 5, Interesting
    Among other things, I repair computers and Windows problems for a living. With the cost of new Dell Desktop PCs now at $299 (sometimes after rebate,) and with my rate being $75 an hour, the math starts to get interesting:

    If it takes 4 hours to totally clean off an severely infested PC, then they might as well get a new PC. If it only takes me two hours, then they're halfway to a new PC. Hmmmm...

    Suppose the hard drive fails, and (like a client) they haven't done a backup in a year. Suppose the PC is a 3 year old PIII PC. New hard drive: $60. Time to install Windows ME (or whatever) with all the drivers: at least an hour, but probably two. Cost: around $150 or a little more for a 3 year old PC. (Add more for software installation and network setup, and I do.) Again, that's halfway to a modern PC that is much faster, has a warranty, and has XP preloaded.

    Not that I wind up going hungry when the client gets a new PC: there's still networking, data transfer, and software installation and setup that needs to get done. But the cost of new PCs has really changed the cost-benefit of fixing versus replacing.

    Of coruse, the best part is when the client says, "Oh, and just take away that old, 'broken' PC. It is of no use to me now." Away it goes with me, because my time is free to me...

    And don't forget, my rates are CHEAP CHEAP CHEAP compared to visits from The Geek Squad. If a consumer has to go through them, then the math in favor of a new PC gets even stronger...

    I can't say I'm wild about this situation, but at least you can see why we're here at it.

  15. Anwser is frustration... by John+Seminal · · Score: 4, Insightful
    I wonder why it is cheaper to buy a new $400 PC than paying top rate of, say $100 per machine, to get someone to insert the recovery CD and get everything back to factory defaults.

    I would guess most people don't see an OS, they see a computer. When they get pissed at the OS, they are really pissed at the computer. So they throw it away. In their thinking, the Compaq running Windows XP is very different from the Dell running Windows XP. After all, the computer boxes look different.

    Maybe people think of their computer like a VCR. If it stops working, you don't get the $2 cleaning fluid tape, you throw it away and buy another.

    It is too bad these people don't donate their old computers.

    I am a person who believes it is a SCAM when colleges buy bran spanking new computers every 2 years, and use property tax to do it. Whenever I have walked around a computer lab, all I see is Word and papers being written, IE and the web being surfed, and the very occasional comp sci student writing code. All this could be done on PIII's. Hell, PII's would work, although it would take a few minutes to load software.

    There is a saying in the advertising world. Don't sell the steak, sell the sizzle. It is a shame, because often people buy hardware they will never utilize. If someone wants to check email, what good is the newest computer? Salespeople don't sell based on your needs. They want to make the largest commision possible, or push whatever product their managers told them to get out the door. And they lie to do it. I was at Best Buy, just walking around. Most of the time, the salespeople in the Computer section are so busy that it is impossible to get one (good thing in my opinion). But this time one saw me, and came up. He said "What computer do you have?". I lied, I did not want a hard sell, I just wanted to browse, so I said I had a P4 2.0ghz with XP. The sales guy said "Oh, I guess that is okay, but if you want the latest security, and more speed, our P4's have XP with the latest security updates, and they will run the latest games better".

    The SOB tried to sneak in a "latest secuirty updates" in the middle of his sales pitch, to put a seed of fear in my mind about my current OS. Gee... thanks for saying anyone can download the latest patches. Gee... thanks for trying to sell me an e-machines.

    The friendly article mentioned that "people are increasingly unwilling to take out their 'software tweezers' to clean their machines", maybe it's time for manufacturers to install a HardReset button (like in a PDA) with a 1 GB ReadOnly Flash drive, which resets everything back to factory.

    Oh God NOOO!!!! Please, no! These assholes who sell computers are already sending CD's with images only. I have a laptop which the recovery CD's are not the OS which I can configure, but an Image of the hard drive, which sets up the partitions the way Microsoft wants. I can't install the OS with a partition left over for Linux.

    Give us the freaking OS we paid for. If I buy a computer, and the OS is forced on my, that I must buy it if I want the PC, then at least give me the OS on a CD and not an image.

    --

    Rosco: "If brains were gunpowder, Enos couldn't blow his nose."

    1. Re:Anwser is frustration... by AtariDatacenter · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Bingo! The people I've fixed their spyware problems for (all relatives, all for free) basically thought that they had a slow computer. They had no idea it was adware/spyware/malware causing the problem, no idea how to get rid of it. It was just that the computer was slow and it was time to buy a new faster one.

      The only time someone came close was when they noticed their Internet connection had a lot of pop-up ads. (And even then, they'd click on the "pop up ads" to close them, when in fact, they were image advertisements on the middle of a webpage, which when they clicked on it, would open up an ad. So then they complain that they close one ad and another comes right back up.)

      The worst Spyware that I saw was one that stuck itself into IE, I think it was eGames? Whatever the name, it would load all sorts of other spyware packages onto the computer. Malware loading malware!

      Truly. The whole thing is OUT OF CONTROL.

    2. Re:Anwser is frustration... by alienw · · Score: 4, Informative

      Colleges don't get any of your property taxes, and their computers are paid for directly by the students, often with a separate IT fee. The older computers often go to departments which don't have enough grant money to afford newer ones. If you go to a university surplus auction, you probably won't find anything faster than a P-II.

      Not to mention that new computers actually end up costing less, because they do not require as much repairs and attention from the IT people. Fans, power supplies, and hard drives start to crap out in massive quantities after a couple of years and are not very economical to replace when there are hundreds of machines.

      As far as the best buy thing: stupid people deserve to get ripped off. If you don't know anything about computers, you probably shouldn't be buying one.

    3. Re:Anwser is frustration... by thatguywhoiam · · Score: 4, Insightful
      As far as the best buy thing: stupid people deserve to get ripped off. If you don't know anything about computers, you probably shouldn't be buying one.

      Man, I was right with you up until this dumbass statement.

      You are conflating stupidity and ignorance. People who are simply ignorant do not inherently deserve to be ripped off. The (original) point of the sales person is to educate a customer on the best choice for their needs.

      You probably well know that keeping up with the latest email virus symptoms requires pretty much daily monitoring of IT news. Why the fuck should Joe Average have to track something that specific just to know that he can in fact download the security patch?

      --
      If Jesus wants me it knows where to find me.
    4. Re:Anwser is frustration... by st0rmshad0w · · Score: 3, Informative

      oh, dell still sends an actual OS cd. that's the only plus to buying from dell that i see...

      This is what really ticked me off when I worked for higher ed. We had a site license for every OS we used, but still had to pay the MS tax on new machines.

    5. Re:Anwser is frustration... by NexusTw1n · · Score: 4, Informative

      If you have a "campus agreement" licence then you didn't have a site licence.

      You had a site upgrade licence.
      What that means is you were entitled to upgrade any OEM version of Windows, to any other version of Windows.

      So, you could upgrade a bunch of 98 machines to XP, or "save" some money ordering XP Home on your Dells rather than XP Pro, but you aren't allowed to install XP on a white box with no existing MS Operating System.

      It is a misunderstanding many people have about the more common versions of MS site licences. It's foolish to think MS don't cover all the bases when creating such purchasing agreements. They didn't become that rich by allowing people to bypass the Windows Tax legally.

      --
      It has become appallingly obvious that our technology has exceeded our humanity. --Albert Einstein
  16. Yes, cheaper by far by fleener · · Score: 4, Interesting

    You want people to return their PCs to factory defaults so that their PCs just get infected again while you takes hours to download all your Windows security patches? Not bloody likely. Are you being serious, or do you work for a spyware company?

    It's far simpler to buy a new PC that has a year or two's worth of security patches already in place -- less for you to download. My uncle has already replaced one PC because of spyware. He's on a dial-up connection. He's not going to sit for hours upon hours so his old PC can reinstall security patches.

  17. Re:Cheaper?-Service with a smile. by B'Trey · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Yeah but if you're willing to throw the computer in the dumpster, then reformatting is an option. The question isn't buying a new computer versus cleaning the spyware, the question is buying a new computer versus formatting-and-reinstalling. I don't see anyway the former should be cheaper.

    --

    "The legitimate powers of government extend only to such acts as are injurious to others." Thomas Jefferson.

  18. because the geek squad @ Best Buy by doorbender · · Score: 5, Informative

    because the geek squad @ Best Buy is charging little old ladies $300 to "fix" thier PC (when it needs rescueing from spyware) and simply add a spyware detector but not actually use it.

    --
    "He's a real midnight golfer"
  19. Geek Squad by C4-GodH8sMe · · Score: 5, Interesting

    As a memeber of the Geek Squad, I must say you make some interesting points. Mostof our business is removing spyware and viruses from machines, which, most of the time, is pretty easy. It does take us a long time though (running a lot of scans, and testing the PC to make sure it's ok). Generally, at our Best Buy store anyway, you can expect to pay $59 for a diagnostic (which basically includes runing memtest86, some DFT, Lucifer, making sure your optical drives operate, and scanning for spyware and viruses), plus $79 for "OS service" (spyware & virus removal, a repair install if necessary + removal). Not really that bad of a deal for the average user really, who really wants his or her machine back, "exactly" how it was "before". We try to tack on NAV2005 or NIS2005 ($49.99 + $10 install/update, $59.99 + $10 install/update, respectively) and Webroot SpySweeper ($29.99 + $10 install + update). As absurd as it sounds, a lot of customers believe they can not install software, and trust us to do so. The prices for in-home worst is a bit higher of course, but brining your machine to a Best Buy or GS store isn't such a bad idea to most customers. And believe me, I recommend plenty of customers just buy a new machine (cost exceeds value).

    --
    We are all Gods unwanted children. Did you ever consider he may hate you too?
  20. Re:offtopic by berboot · · Score: 4, Informative

    I have had to set up several new Dell's from scratch that lack a floppy drive, yet use SATA harddrive's. I have found that the easiest way is just to find the sata drivers and slipstream them into a SP2 installation disc.

    Instructions can be found all over google, and it typically takes less than an hour or so to make a good slipstream that you can use on most every computers' installation.

    Some links i had bookmarked: Here and here.

  21. Re:when will all you dupe Nazis.... by Pantero+Blanco · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I think that might be the editors' intention- to let people that missed an article the first time around have a shot at reading and commenting on it. Now, perhaps if they would post and LET PEOPLE KNOW that that was their intention, repeat articles wouldn't get flooded by 100 "It's a dupe" posts.

    Slashdot public opinion seems to be moving a bit in favor of the "It's a dupe!" crowd...Not that they're the majority, but where I saw -1 Redundant on all of the "dupe" posts a few months back, I'm seeing not only positive, but +4 and +5 moderations. If the editors are posting repeats with a plan in mind, they should say something, because it's obvious that a lot of people are regarding it as a problem.

  22. Re:offtopic by eljasbo · · Score: 3, Informative

    Check out NLite to slipstream service packs, hotfixes, answer files, and drivers. It works really well for all my custom windows disks. Get it here: http://www.nliteos.com/

  23. Re:Cheaper?-Service with a smile. by Golias · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Think about it for a minute. A typical college kid who's working as a techie in a computer store is going to expect about $20/hr for their time. This means the cost to actually employ that kid (after taxes and regulatory requirements) is closer to $35/hr.

    You will never get even close to 1/2 utilization out of your staff of repair kids, you need to collect at least double that from the customers ($70), and then another $20 for the cost of keeping your doors open (and for the store manager to spend at least part of his/her time making sure the techies aren't stealing all the 2 GB Ram sticks or slacking off or whatever.)

    That leaves $80 a day of sweet, sweet profit, all for the joy of dealing with angry assholes who will often take out their frustrations on you. Gosh, I wonder why there aren't more places fighting to get a piece of that action?

    From the users perspective, they could pay $100/hr to lose all their data and end up with the same crappy computer they always had, or for a mere $300 more they could have a shiny new computer with 5 times the CPU power, 4 times the memory, 4 times the hard drive space, a DVD burner, a massively better video card, and a pretty new keyboard. It's not surprising that a lot of people decide that they'd rather spend a little extra than pouring more money into a system which has been giving them fits.

    --

    Information wants to be anthropomorphized.

  24. it's like this... by Sfing_ter · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I tell my customers after a 15min. glance (free of charge), that they have 2 options:
    1) I clean it there (provided they have dsl), and it will take anywhere from 2-6 hours and after that it may still require a 2hr. re-install of the OS.
    OR
    2) I take it to my shop (where I can work on it and others and play Quake), and charge them a 2hrs. labor flat fee.

    Most choose 1, i don't know why I always recommend 2, because, hey, I love my Quake... :)

    When the bill is in the range that they could have gotten a new computer, they realize their mistake. However, I do set them up with a spyware blocker, MS' Official, Firefox for browsing (with a 5 minute WOW tutorial), and recommend them switching to Thunderbird for email, and recommend they purchase Norton for Anti-Virus (or update).

    (And yes, for most of them IE is their ISP... not kidding, 'I pay SBC, but Internet Explorer is my ISP...right?').

    I do what the customer asks, and when I point out that they are asking for the incorrect thing, they get indignant and demand their ignorance! So I provide them with that for which they ask.

    I have also had some who say 'Can't I just get a new computer and give this one to the kids?', why yes... or you could just have me get your data backed up, restore the os, and you can have it all back good as new for 2 hrs. labor... "NO, I want a new one", and so it goes.

    I got a free 1ghz. laptop that way, customer got angry said get my data off it and throw it in the trash. Passed my K6-500 compaq Lappy to my son,(Mepis 3.3.1), running good, and I get the new trash :)

    Saving data costs money and most people want that done even though they do not/will not do it before they have problems...

    What part of,"An emergency on your part does not constitute one on mine" do you not understand?

    --
    A computer once beat me at chess, but it was no match for me at kick boxing. Emo Philips