Slashdot Mirror


Spyware Removal: Drop PC in Dumpster

morganx writes "The New York Times is reporting that some users prefer throwing out their PCs and buying new ones to actually removing their spyware. Does this mean lots of free hardware for the dumpster-divers among us?"

90 of 705 comments (clear)

  1. Cheaper? by fembots · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I wonder why it is cheaper to buy a new $400 PC than paying top rate of, say $100 per machine, to get someone to insert the recovery CD and get everything back to factory defaults.

    I find people disposing affected PCs highly irresponsible. Would someone think of those homeless children who dumpster-dived and brought home (or somewhere whatever) such PC? It's like throwing out old smoke alarm with perfectly good Uranium bits inside, someone's going to get hurt.

    The friendly article mentioned that "people are increasingly unwilling to take out their 'software tweezers' to clean their machines", maybe it's time for manufacturers to install a HardReset button (like in a PDA) with a 1 GB ReadOnly Flash drive, which resets everything back to factory.

    1. Re:Cheaper? by Leiterfluid · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I agree, how difficult is it to just do a basic OS install, and build from there. Or, as you suggest, use the recovery media from the manufacturer. I want to know who these morons are that are having their systems infected so quickly, and so often. I have a PC at home that is running Windows XP, that hasn't had a clean rebuild on it since I originally installed Windows 98 on it. I went straight from 98 to XP, and have never had a significant problem with viruses, adware, or anything else of that ilk. If it did happen, I'd be more prone to performing a fresh reinstall rather than throwing it away.

    2. Re:Cheaper? by emidln · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I think it's pretty damn difficult. As a coder and techie, I cannot figure out how to install Windows XP on my only computer capable of running it. Windows just blue-screens while trying to format the hard drive. I assume it needs drivers for my SATA chipset, since my computer is newer than XP SP2, but my PC doesn't have a floppy drive, space for a floppy drive, or a power cable for a floppy drive. I'm tempted to read up on what kind of power a floppy takes and wire a floppy drive up to an external power source and connect it to the fdc (mobo supports the floppy, power supply doesn't). Oh, and Windows will not treat my usb floppy drive as an A: drive during the install, which is the only place where it will accept drivers from.

    3. Re:Cheaper? by simcop2387 · · Score: 3, Informative

      it takes the exact same power as the other drives, though it'd be prudent to look up which order they are, i don't have them memorized

    4. Re:Cheaper? by JohnFluxx · · Score: 2, Informative

      On the power leads, red is 5V and yellow is 12V, for both floppy and hard disks.

    5. Re:Cheaper? by B'Trey · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I see. And throwing out the PC and buying a new one solves this problem exactly how?

      --

      "The legitimate powers of government extend only to such acts as are injurious to others." Thomas Jefferson.

    6. Re:Cheaper? by Michalson · · Score: 2, Informative

      All you need is a moltex to floppy adapter (it's basically the same cable, only with a different connector). For example here is one for $1.69.

    7. Re:Cheaper? by JanneM · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I wonder why it is cheaper to buy a new $400 PC than paying top rate of, say $100 per machine, to get someone to insert the recovery CD and get everything back to factory defaults.

      Rather, it's either pay $100 to get the same two-year old machine back, complete with scuffed exterior, ugly/dirty keyboard, jerky mouse and, lately, a worrying fan noise; or for an additional $300 get a brand-new faster PC with the latest OS, more memory and bigger drive.

      Not a bad deal.

      --
      Trust the Computer. The Computer is your friend.
    8. Re:Cheaper? by pete6677 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I just wonder when Microsoft, along with some board manufacturers, will get their collective heads out of their collective asses and realize the 1980s are over and people don't use floppys anymore. We could officially consider the floppy disk to be dead and buried if it weren't required for certain system restores. It seems like a relatively easy fix to allow drivers to be loaded from CD or USB drives or something that holds more than a meg of data.

    9. Re:Cheaper? by Golias · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I'm sure everybody who replied was just trying to be helpful regarding your Windows install, but they managed to prove your point quite well. A typical non-techie hearing all that advice would be utterly lost and baffled.

      --

      Information wants to be anthropomorphized.

    10. Re:Cheaper? by inode_buddha · · Score: 5, Insightful

      And the *vast majority* of people using PC's will actually do any of the above, if they even RTFM that far. Corporate use is a different ballgame. Yeah, right. Most users I know can't be arsed to read the comic book about how to plug in a monitor. Posters are no good either. It should just "plug into a wall and just work". Well, they wanted to buy a toaster, and so they got sold on toasters. Too bad computers are a bit more complex that toasters, and of course the manufacturers and devels have no interest in changing this. Now, we have landfills full of toasters. Yeah, I'm *pissed* in case you haven't figured it out yet. After all, do you see people expecting to buy and use a car with zero training, no licence or maintenance? Why do they apply a different standard to computers?

      --
      C|N>K
    11. Re:Cheaper? by cbiltcliffe · · Score: 3, Interesting

      And how the hell do the "unreplacable" programs get transferred from their old spyware-infested piece of crap to their new $299 piece of crap eMachine?

      The same problem still exists.

      --
      "City hall" in German is "Rathaus" Kinda explains a few things......
    12. Re:Cheaper? by Agent__Smith · · Score: 5, Funny

      "After all, do you see people expecting to buy and use a car with zero training, no licence or maintenance? Why do they apply a different standard to computers?"

      Ever heard of a MAC?

      --
      "It seems that we are at the age where life stops giving us things, and starts taking them away..." Indiana Jones
    13. Re:Cheaper? by lgftsa · · Score: 2, Informative

      You can in W2K. The BIOS provides disk services, which enable the first stage partition/format to succeed. After that, the cut down version of Windows that the installer runs in loads hardware drivers which take over the disk sub-system and if the SATA drivers are not compatible with your chipset/motherboard/drive, the system will blue-screen with a vengance.

      Dell desktops have been particularly prone to this over the past year. We had to get the SATA drivers from IBM, as the DELL recovery CDs did not work.

    14. Re:Cheaper? by 1u3hr · · Score: 2, Interesting
      I cannot figure out how to install Windows XP on my only computer capable of running it. Windows just blue-screens while trying to format the hard drive. I assume it needs drivers for my SATA chipset, since my computer is newer than XP SP2, but my PC doesn't have a floppy

      See nLite, a method of customising Windows installers, that among other things lets you add your own drivers to the CD image. (You will need to prepare this on a PC running 2k or XP though.) There's a forum if you have any problems.

    15. Re:Cheaper? by wstott · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Until all PCs in business offices have USB ports, the sneaker net will run on floppies. It is interesting how fast folks take to the USB jump drives. They are an easy analog for a floppy drive in peoples minds, they understand them because they understand floppies. Of course unless you are running 98 wich brings us back to floppies.

    16. Re:Cheaper? by Jasin+Natael · · Score: 3, Insightful
      What world are you living in? .... Floppies are utterly disposable. Pass them out like candy and don't care if they come back.

      What world are YOU living in? Pass out a URL with a directory- or file-specific password, save yourself the time and expense of creating the floppies, and then nobody throws anything away.

      Jasin Natael
      --
      True science means that when you re-evaluate the evidence, you re-evaluate your faith.
    17. Re:Cheaper? by Redwin · · Score: 2, Informative

      Why are you trying to boot of a disk to format prior to installing Win XP? Win XP has an option in during the setup to format the drive for you. I haven't used a floppy disk for about 4 years, yet I've installed Win XP countless times. All you need to do is set the CD drive first in the boot order and that should do it. No floppy drive is needed.

      --
      Warning, comments may not have been passed by the sanity department of my brain.
    18. Re:Cheaper? by ckaminski · · Score: 2, Informative

      Yea, um, if you don't have drivers to actually boot the disk, you need a driver disk, to install said devices and format.

      Case in point, I had to install an HP Blade BL20 G3 (brand new P4) yesterday, and couldn't get the Windows 2000 boot process to see the drives (there are USB CDROM and Floppy drives on this, since blades don't typically have any of those). And it wouldn't work. HP ships a specially configured CD for installing Windows.

      So yea, it's possible he's running into a problem. Not supporting driver CD's is a problem Microsoft needs to solve. Most linuxes I use support manufacturer disks that aren't floppies... Why can't WindowsXP?

  2. Dupe Removal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    Drop timothy in the dumpster... along with Zonk, Taco, etc.

    1. Re:Dupe Removal by Rei · · Score: 5, Funny

      On the first Dupe of Monday, Timothy gave to me
      People trashing spywared PCs

      On the second Dupe of Monday, Timothy gave to me
      Old computer booklets
      And people trashing spywared PCs ...

      --
      Point of interest. Offering to shoot us might not work so well as an incentive as you might imagine.
    2. Re:Dupe Removal by someonewhois · · Score: 5, Funny

      I'm waiting for the day that there's a slashdot article that only links to another slashdot article.

    3. Re:Dupe Removal by qewl · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I'm completely convinced all the dupes and extended mysterious future posts(Not to mention increase paid subscriptions) are merely to increase page views and therefore site reloads to increase revenue. There's just no way the editors could post so many dupes within hours by mistake.

      --

      (\_/)
      (O.o) This is Bunny. (> <)
    4. Re:Dupe Removal by Linus+Torvaalds · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Have you forgotten the age-old maxim? Do not ascribe to greed that which can be readily explained by sheer idiocy.

    5. Re:Dupe Removal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      12 first post's a milking
      11dupe stories dancing
      10 google articles singing
      9 M$bashing threads
      8 Karma whores
      7 hello.jpg's
      8. KDE vs. Gnome flamewars
      5 roland pipsquelle slashvertisments
      4 netcraft confirms BSD is dead posts
      3 build your self something you could buy for 1/3 the cost stories
      2. trolls a prancing
      a cmdr taco eating a burrito in a lemon tree

    6. Re:Dupe Removal by clem · · Score: 5, Funny

      Don't worry, I have a feeling we'll be seeing it again.

      --
      Your courageous and selfless spelling corrections have made me a better person.
  3. Fool me once.... by BWJones · · Score: 5, Interesting

    It just boggles the mind that people would throw out a Windows machine and then replace it with another! Windows machine which is immediately susceptible and commonly infected within twenty minutes or so of being re-connected to the Internet. This happens often even before you have time to install updates. The old fool me once, fool me twice adage comes to mind.

    The smarter move would be to migrate to a system that is less affected by worms/virus/security issues. For the vast majority, I would think that system would be OS X. But hey, that's just me. If your time is that valuable that you would simply replace your system rather than wiping it and reinstalling the OS, you think that you would either be smart enough to think different. Of course clicking on the referenced article makes you sit through an ad for Dell unless you dismiss the ad, so what does that mean? :-) Interestingly in the linked article, Dr. Wong does replace her HP system with a Powerbook. This has been our experience as well. We have replaced most of our Windows based systems with Macs running OS X leaving our Windows systems headless and sitting behind a Macintosh and a firewall with respect to the Internet. For grad student systems, giving them a Mac is the best possible solution. They can download all the software they want, surf the web and write their email all on the same system they use for their data analysis without worry and I'm not getting calls or visits to my office saying "Ummmmmmm. I think my system is infected" Time devoted to troubleshooting has gone to essentially nothing. Additionally, the last meeting I had down in our computer science department revealed that a good portion of the faculty were also switching from Windows/Linux/SGI to OS X. That was encouraging for a whole lot of reasons.

    --
    Visit Jonesblog and say hello.
    1. Re:Fool me once.... by Linus+Torvaalds · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It just boggles the mind that people would throw out a Windows machine and then replace it with another! Windows machine which is immediately susceptible and commonly infected within twenty minutes or so of being re-connected to the Internet.

      The smarter move would be to migrate to a system that is less affected by worms/virus/security issues.

      The majority of people have only been exposed to Windows. They think computers simply wear out. They don't see it as getting infected over and over again by dozens of worms, they see it as "oh well, computer's worn out, better replace it".

      In that context, it's perfectly reasonable to go and get something similar to what they already had. They don't think anything happening is wrong. They think this is normal.

      Until something happens to teach the average person that this isn't right and can be avoided by switching to something like Mac OS X, this will carry on happening. I have no idea what that something is. Maybe a virus that forces the person to read an explanation of the issues before it gives access of the computer back or something? I dunno.

    2. Re:Fool me once.... by bani · · Score: 2, Funny

      If you want a system which isnt affected by worms/virus/security issues at all, you could always use a TRS-80.

      definitely safer than OSX.

      there's no OS updates to have to fuss about with, either.

      They can download all the software they want, surf the web and write their email all on the same system they use for their data analysis without worry and I'm not getting calls or visits to my office saying "Ummmmmmm. I think my system is infected"

      You could accomplish the same thing with apple //. The hardware is a lot cheaper too.

  4. *sigh* I tired.... by tekiegreg · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Saw this dupe article in the mysterious future....emailed the on duty editor as fast as I could, and it went anyways well *dons flamesuit* let's get ready to rumble....

    --
    ...in bed
  5. The Dupes by kensai · · Score: 3, Informative

    And the dupes they just keep a coming.

  6. Yeah. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    I'm typing this from a dumpster right now. Thank you, spyware.

  7. Dupes Overwhelming! by MrMista_B · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Okay, I'm new here, but holy crap, these dupes are almost worse than spam!

    Seriously. Do the admins just not even read /. anymore?

    Heh, guess they're just smarter than the rest of us then. :-)

  8. More than a replacement by balamw · · Score: 2, Funny

    By the looks of it, "the doctor who replaced her infected computer", and "says she no longer clicks on pop-ups" did more than replace her comupter. She switched to a Mac (and spent a bit more than $500 for that 51" Powerbook ;-)). B

  9. Re:Aside from the fact that this is a dupe by Mr2001 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Do you really think the kind of person who (1) lets his PC fill up with spyware, then (2) chooses to spend $500 on a new PC instead of spending a couple hours cleaning it out, is going to want to learn Linux?

    "OMG WTF happened to My Computer? Where's Internet Explorer? Why do I have to have a password?"

    --
    Visual IRC: Fast. Powerful. Free.
  10. Just don't do like a friend did... by TWX · · Score: 2, Funny

    So, some friends of mine are going dumpster diving. This is back in the middle of the tech bubble, so fairly cash-rich companies are continually throwing out good equipment as they buy more. Anyway, the experienced one is driving around looking for suitable places, with the newbie riding shotgun. They pull up behind a high end computer service business in a strip mall to check out the goods. The experienced one had told many stories (and provided proof) of incredible finds in places like this, and spurred on by these stories the newbie hops out of the car, runs over, and vaults himself over the lip of the dumpster, feet first inside. What greeted him wasn't the spoils of computer repair, but the spoiled discards of the Chinese restaurant two doors down from the computer business...

    In Phoenix, in the Summer...

    And there weren't any computer parts discarded that day by that shop anyway...

    Boy would that suck...

    --
    Do not look into laser with remaining eye.
  11. Cheaper?-Service with a smile. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    "I wonder why it is cheaper to buy a new $400 PC than paying top rate of, say $100 per machine, to get someone to insert the recovery CD and get everything back to factory defaults."

    Maybe the better question is: Why do service centers charge so much? Seems like there's plenty of blame to go around.

    1. Re:Cheaper?-Service with a smile. by B'Trey · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Yeah but if you're willing to throw the computer in the dumpster, then reformatting is an option. The question isn't buying a new computer versus cleaning the spyware, the question is buying a new computer versus formatting-and-reinstalling. I don't see anyway the former should be cheaper.

      --

      "The legitimate powers of government extend only to such acts as are injurious to others." Thomas Jefferson.

    2. Re:Cheaper?-Service with a smile. by Golias · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Think about it for a minute. A typical college kid who's working as a techie in a computer store is going to expect about $20/hr for their time. This means the cost to actually employ that kid (after taxes and regulatory requirements) is closer to $35/hr.

      You will never get even close to 1/2 utilization out of your staff of repair kids, you need to collect at least double that from the customers ($70), and then another $20 for the cost of keeping your doors open (and for the store manager to spend at least part of his/her time making sure the techies aren't stealing all the 2 GB Ram sticks or slacking off or whatever.)

      That leaves $80 a day of sweet, sweet profit, all for the joy of dealing with angry assholes who will often take out their frustrations on you. Gosh, I wonder why there aren't more places fighting to get a piece of that action?

      From the users perspective, they could pay $100/hr to lose all their data and end up with the same crappy computer they always had, or for a mere $300 more they could have a shiny new computer with 5 times the CPU power, 4 times the memory, 4 times the hard drive space, a DVD burner, a massively better video card, and a pretty new keyboard. It's not surprising that a lot of people decide that they'd rather spend a little extra than pouring more money into a system which has been giving them fits.

      --

      Information wants to be anthropomorphized.

    3. Re:Cheaper?-Service with a smile. by 1u3hr · · Score: 2, Informative

      I think it's more an excuse to update their PC. (Like getting a new BMW when the ash trays are full.) Possibly one reason people don't just wipe and reinstall is that many PCs now come with some weird OEM installer that uses files stored on the harddisk; if that's screwed you have to buy a new OS at retail, and for not much more you can get a new PC with an OEM Windows and repeat. One might suspect planned obsolescence. I might have expected a mention of the Mac mini here; but it seems like many abusive relationships, no matter how many times they beat you up you convince yourself that they've turned a new leaf and go back for more punishment rather than breaking away.

    4. Re:Cheaper?-Service with a smile. by jrockway · · Score: 2, Informative

      Yeah, I get $7.39/hour and we "charge"* $35/hour minimum.

      * Of course it's not real money, it's a sheet of paper that says "so and so department has allocated $35 to computer repair expenses".

      --
      My other car is first.
  12. Do the Slashdot editors read? by cytoman · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I'm quite shocked to see so many dupes posted all the time. Do the editors scan the stories being posted, at all? They seem to be so unaware of what is already posted... the worst cases being dupes occuring on the same day (not this story).

    Seriously, I think that given that Slashdot has become so big in terms of users, the editors need to be more serious about making sure dupes don't happen... if the editors are too busy, appoint a dupe editor who will catch the dupes before they are posted. All it requires is for the dupe editor to do a search on Slashdot to see if a story has already been posted...

    1. Re:Do the Slashdot editors read? by garcia · · Score: 5, Interesting

      They have several... They are called "Subscribers". I have done by job multiple times and been thanked by the editors via e-mail at least a handful of times... Yet there have been just as many (if not more) times that I have submitted the story as being duped and it has been ignored.

      So, we are paying to do their jobs *and* we are being ignored.

      It's almost as good as being a Union employee! :)

  13. Whoa! It's like, Saturday, all over again! by Monte · · Score: 4, Interesting

    And I emailed the "editor" telling them it was a dupe a good 10 minutes before it went live.

    Hello? [thump thump thump] Is this mic on? Come in, Rangoon...

    1. Re:Whoa! It's like, Saturday, all over again! by callipygian-showsyst · · Score: 5, Interesting

      who's the greater fool? The editor (who already made millions of dot-com dollars from /. and doesn't have to care)? Or you who paid for a subscription so you can see dupes early?

    2. Re:Whoa! It's like, Saturday, all over again! by Monte · · Score: 4, Interesting

      The greatest fool is one who re-ups his subscription in light of this.

      Which I won't.

  14. In related news... by Cr0w+T.+Trollbot · · Score: 2, Funny
    ...some Slashdot editors have found it cheaper to just approve dupes rather than screening for them.

    Crow T. Trollbot

  15. It's not uranium in your smoke detector... by PornMaster · · Score: 5, Informative

    It's Americium-241.

    For more info on americium, see: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Americium

    1. Re:It's not uranium in your smoke detector... by Rob+Carr · · Score: 2, Informative
      Go buy yourself "The Radioactive Boy Scout."

      The author's got his axes to grind, but it's amazing what the kid was able to accomplish. Frighting, but amazing.

      And sad how things turned out.

      --
      This sig seemed like a good idea at the time....
  16. ObQuirk! by overshoot · · Score: 4, Funny
    I wonder why it is cheaper to buy a new $400 PC than paying top rate of, say $100 per machine, to get someone to insert the recovery CD and get everything back to factory defaults.

    Objection, Your Honor! Assumes digital media not in evidence!

    Last I heard, MS was prohibiting OEMs from shipping recovery CDs. That hard drive is all you get.

    --
    Lacking <sarcasm> tags, /. substitutes moderation as "Troll."
    1. Re:ObQuirk! by ocelotbob · · Score: 5, Informative

      They can't ship an OEM copy of XP; if they ship a CD, which most makers do, they have to ship a recovery disc locked to that model of computer.

      --

      Marxism is the opiate of dumbasses

  17. It is not just "people" by geoswan · · Score: 3, Interesting
    It is not just "people". The article says that Tucker, the internet executive who said he bought a new machine, and threw out his old one, because getting rid of the spyware was too difficult, has a PhD in Computer Science.

    Ordinary people getting frustrated is one thing. They lack the right skills. A PhD in computer science is a whole other question.

    1. Re:It is not just "people" by antrik · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "Computer science is no more about computers than astronomy is about telescopes." -- Edsger Dijkstra

      --
      All my comments get moderated +-0, spotless.
    2. Re:It is not just "people" by frenchs · · Score: 4, Insightful
      I can't think of a better way to say it, so I'll just quote Edsger.
      "Computer Science is no more about computers than astronomy is about telescopes."

      E W Dijkstra
  18. Reminds me.. by Idealius · · Score: 2, Funny

    ..of a guy I was phone supporting whom lived in Queens, New York:

    Him: "Ahhh it's hopeless.."

    Me: "Nah, let's just try the next solution.."

    Him: "Ya know what would fix this up good?"

    Me: *chuckle* "What's that?"

    Him: "A 2 lb. sledge. I tell ya, 2 lb. sledge fixes EVERYTHING.."

    Me: rofl

    The accent was priceless.. the word 'sledge' must have been invented in NY..

  19. Re:Aside from the fact that this is a dupe by einhverfr · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I have several customers who have migrated to Linux for similar reasons. They are all beginner consumers.

    The problem largely is that tech support people treat consumers as idiots incapabile of learning the system. I usually start by explaining spyware, how it gets on your computer, how to avoid it/prevent it, etc. Then if it continues, I start suggesting Linux. I show them via a demo system how easy it is to use, and they are usually sold on the idea pretty quickly.

    Computers aren't that hard to understand if we dispense with the tech talk and actually focus on communicating with the consumers.

    --

    LedgerSMB: Open source Accounting/ERP
  20. Re:Premium subscription service by Monte · · Score: 4, Informative

    Is one of the benefits of being a Slashdot subscriber NOT having to see duplicate stories on the front page?

    As a subscriber I can answer this with an authoritive "no fscking way".

    You do get to see articles before they "go live" to the hoi-polloi, and you can even e-mail the editor if you think there's a problem with the article (say, if you know it's a dupe from about 48 hours ago).

    You can see for yourself just how well this all works out.

  21. Cheap hardware makes for strange support options. by wernst · · Score: 5, Interesting
    Among other things, I repair computers and Windows problems for a living. With the cost of new Dell Desktop PCs now at $299 (sometimes after rebate,) and with my rate being $75 an hour, the math starts to get interesting:

    If it takes 4 hours to totally clean off an severely infested PC, then they might as well get a new PC. If it only takes me two hours, then they're halfway to a new PC. Hmmmm...

    Suppose the hard drive fails, and (like a client) they haven't done a backup in a year. Suppose the PC is a 3 year old PIII PC. New hard drive: $60. Time to install Windows ME (or whatever) with all the drivers: at least an hour, but probably two. Cost: around $150 or a little more for a 3 year old PC. (Add more for software installation and network setup, and I do.) Again, that's halfway to a modern PC that is much faster, has a warranty, and has XP preloaded.

    Not that I wind up going hungry when the client gets a new PC: there's still networking, data transfer, and software installation and setup that needs to get done. But the cost of new PCs has really changed the cost-benefit of fixing versus replacing.

    Of coruse, the best part is when the client says, "Oh, and just take away that old, 'broken' PC. It is of no use to me now." Away it goes with me, because my time is free to me...

    And don't forget, my rates are CHEAP CHEAP CHEAP compared to visits from The Geek Squad. If a consumer has to go through them, then the math in favor of a new PC gets even stronger...

    I can't say I'm wild about this situation, but at least you can see why we're here at it.

  22. Anwser is frustration... by John+Seminal · · Score: 4, Insightful
    I wonder why it is cheaper to buy a new $400 PC than paying top rate of, say $100 per machine, to get someone to insert the recovery CD and get everything back to factory defaults.

    I would guess most people don't see an OS, they see a computer. When they get pissed at the OS, they are really pissed at the computer. So they throw it away. In their thinking, the Compaq running Windows XP is very different from the Dell running Windows XP. After all, the computer boxes look different.

    Maybe people think of their computer like a VCR. If it stops working, you don't get the $2 cleaning fluid tape, you throw it away and buy another.

    It is too bad these people don't donate their old computers.

    I am a person who believes it is a SCAM when colleges buy bran spanking new computers every 2 years, and use property tax to do it. Whenever I have walked around a computer lab, all I see is Word and papers being written, IE and the web being surfed, and the very occasional comp sci student writing code. All this could be done on PIII's. Hell, PII's would work, although it would take a few minutes to load software.

    There is a saying in the advertising world. Don't sell the steak, sell the sizzle. It is a shame, because often people buy hardware they will never utilize. If someone wants to check email, what good is the newest computer? Salespeople don't sell based on your needs. They want to make the largest commision possible, or push whatever product their managers told them to get out the door. And they lie to do it. I was at Best Buy, just walking around. Most of the time, the salespeople in the Computer section are so busy that it is impossible to get one (good thing in my opinion). But this time one saw me, and came up. He said "What computer do you have?". I lied, I did not want a hard sell, I just wanted to browse, so I said I had a P4 2.0ghz with XP. The sales guy said "Oh, I guess that is okay, but if you want the latest security, and more speed, our P4's have XP with the latest security updates, and they will run the latest games better".

    The SOB tried to sneak in a "latest secuirty updates" in the middle of his sales pitch, to put a seed of fear in my mind about my current OS. Gee... thanks for saying anyone can download the latest patches. Gee... thanks for trying to sell me an e-machines.

    The friendly article mentioned that "people are increasingly unwilling to take out their 'software tweezers' to clean their machines", maybe it's time for manufacturers to install a HardReset button (like in a PDA) with a 1 GB ReadOnly Flash drive, which resets everything back to factory.

    Oh God NOOO!!!! Please, no! These assholes who sell computers are already sending CD's with images only. I have a laptop which the recovery CD's are not the OS which I can configure, but an Image of the hard drive, which sets up the partitions the way Microsoft wants. I can't install the OS with a partition left over for Linux.

    Give us the freaking OS we paid for. If I buy a computer, and the OS is forced on my, that I must buy it if I want the PC, then at least give me the OS on a CD and not an image.

    --

    Rosco: "If brains were gunpowder, Enos couldn't blow his nose."

    1. Re:Anwser is frustration... by AtariDatacenter · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Bingo! The people I've fixed their spyware problems for (all relatives, all for free) basically thought that they had a slow computer. They had no idea it was adware/spyware/malware causing the problem, no idea how to get rid of it. It was just that the computer was slow and it was time to buy a new faster one.

      The only time someone came close was when they noticed their Internet connection had a lot of pop-up ads. (And even then, they'd click on the "pop up ads" to close them, when in fact, they were image advertisements on the middle of a webpage, which when they clicked on it, would open up an ad. So then they complain that they close one ad and another comes right back up.)

      The worst Spyware that I saw was one that stuck itself into IE, I think it was eGames? Whatever the name, it would load all sorts of other spyware packages onto the computer. Malware loading malware!

      Truly. The whole thing is OUT OF CONTROL.

    2. Re:Anwser is frustration... by alienw · · Score: 4, Informative

      Colleges don't get any of your property taxes, and their computers are paid for directly by the students, often with a separate IT fee. The older computers often go to departments which don't have enough grant money to afford newer ones. If you go to a university surplus auction, you probably won't find anything faster than a P-II.

      Not to mention that new computers actually end up costing less, because they do not require as much repairs and attention from the IT people. Fans, power supplies, and hard drives start to crap out in massive quantities after a couple of years and are not very economical to replace when there are hundreds of machines.

      As far as the best buy thing: stupid people deserve to get ripped off. If you don't know anything about computers, you probably shouldn't be buying one.

    3. Re:Anwser is frustration... by Doppler00 · · Score: 2, Informative

      I used to work for a university too and we regularly upgraded systems. One of our primary reasons was that old machines simply started wearing out. Floppy drives, CD-ROM drives, power supplies, monitors, etc. all start going bad. Yes, you can repair them, but once you have 100+ systems and stuff starts breaking fairly regularly it comes time to just start replacing entire lines of systems before failures occur. This minimizes student frustration with happening to find that broken machine.

    4. Re:Anwser is frustration... by thatguywhoiam · · Score: 4, Insightful
      As far as the best buy thing: stupid people deserve to get ripped off. If you don't know anything about computers, you probably shouldn't be buying one.

      Man, I was right with you up until this dumbass statement.

      You are conflating stupidity and ignorance. People who are simply ignorant do not inherently deserve to be ripped off. The (original) point of the sales person is to educate a customer on the best choice for their needs.

      You probably well know that keeping up with the latest email virus symptoms requires pretty much daily monitoring of IT news. Why the fuck should Joe Average have to track something that specific just to know that he can in fact download the security patch?

      --
      If Jesus wants me it knows where to find me.
    5. Re:Anwser is frustration... by st0rmshad0w · · Score: 3, Informative

      oh, dell still sends an actual OS cd. that's the only plus to buying from dell that i see...

      This is what really ticked me off when I worked for higher ed. We had a site license for every OS we used, but still had to pay the MS tax on new machines.

    6. Re:Anwser is frustration... by stuartkahler · · Score: 2, Insightful

      SCAM when colleges buy bran spanking new computers every 2 years
      A big reason colleges buy new computers instead of using acceptable donated machines is that having donated machines means they're all different. A lab full of random PCs is much more difficult to maintain. With identical models, if a machine dies, you can use 90% of what's left over for replacement parts. You have guaranteed compatibility and the drivers are already installed and updated to your normal standards.

      My uncle works for a tech firms that actually needs top end machines, and anytime that they actually need to do an upgrade, they just go ahead and order a dozen identical machines and upgrade a bunch of people who aren't really ready yet. They save a lot of time and money by not having to maintain a different model for each person. Just think of how much easier it is to have a mobo die and just swap the hard drive into broken down system that had the hard drive fail. As long as it's not an OS issue, or the HD doesn't fail, you can literally have a system (especially a laptop) back up and running in less than an hour. If it is an OS issue, you can essentially swap out the entire machine at once and rule out hardware failure in less than half an hour. The only downside is if the model has a common failure point, you'll be intimately familiar with it. It gives you leverage against the maker, though, to make sure they fix it in every machine. You also know what to look for before the machine actually fails.

      When he buys laptops, he gets ones with quick swappable hard drives. He can tell you in five minutes if the problem is hardware or software. If it's hardware, he's already back up and running and the old unit is getting packed up and sent back to the manufacturer. If it's software, it's his problem anyway.

    7. Re:Anwser is frustration... by NexusTw1n · · Score: 4, Informative

      If you have a "campus agreement" licence then you didn't have a site licence.

      You had a site upgrade licence.
      What that means is you were entitled to upgrade any OEM version of Windows, to any other version of Windows.

      So, you could upgrade a bunch of 98 machines to XP, or "save" some money ordering XP Home on your Dells rather than XP Pro, but you aren't allowed to install XP on a white box with no existing MS Operating System.

      It is a misunderstanding many people have about the more common versions of MS site licences. It's foolish to think MS don't cover all the bases when creating such purchasing agreements. They didn't become that rich by allowing people to bypass the Windows Tax legally.

      --
      It has become appallingly obvious that our technology has exceeded our humanity. --Albert Einstein
  23. Yes, cheaper by far by fleener · · Score: 4, Interesting

    You want people to return their PCs to factory defaults so that their PCs just get infected again while you takes hours to download all your Windows security patches? Not bloody likely. Are you being serious, or do you work for a spyware company?

    It's far simpler to buy a new PC that has a year or two's worth of security patches already in place -- less for you to download. My uncle has already replaced one PC because of spyware. He's on a dial-up connection. He's not going to sit for hours upon hours so his old PC can reinstall security patches.

  24. 51" powerbook? by r_cerq · · Score: 2, Funny

    Yeah, she must have spent a few grand on the crane alone ;)

  25. because the geek squad @ Best Buy by doorbender · · Score: 5, Informative

    because the geek squad @ Best Buy is charging little old ladies $300 to "fix" thier PC (when it needs rescueing from spyware) and simply add a spyware detector but not actually use it.

    --
    "He's a real midnight golfer"
  26. Geek Squad by C4-GodH8sMe · · Score: 5, Interesting

    As a memeber of the Geek Squad, I must say you make some interesting points. Mostof our business is removing spyware and viruses from machines, which, most of the time, is pretty easy. It does take us a long time though (running a lot of scans, and testing the PC to make sure it's ok). Generally, at our Best Buy store anyway, you can expect to pay $59 for a diagnostic (which basically includes runing memtest86, some DFT, Lucifer, making sure your optical drives operate, and scanning for spyware and viruses), plus $79 for "OS service" (spyware & virus removal, a repair install if necessary + removal). Not really that bad of a deal for the average user really, who really wants his or her machine back, "exactly" how it was "before". We try to tack on NAV2005 or NIS2005 ($49.99 + $10 install/update, $59.99 + $10 install/update, respectively) and Webroot SpySweeper ($29.99 + $10 install + update). As absurd as it sounds, a lot of customers believe they can not install software, and trust us to do so. The prices for in-home worst is a bit higher of course, but brining your machine to a Best Buy or GS store isn't such a bad idea to most customers. And believe me, I recommend plenty of customers just buy a new machine (cost exceeds value).

    --
    We are all Gods unwanted children. Did you ever consider he may hate you too?
  27. Excess. by deemaunik · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I'm assuming this is mainly geared towards Americans, considering it's printed in the NYTimes. But, think about the mindset for a minute. Americans are the individuals who are famous for the Biggest Trucks, Supersized Meals, Huge Homes, etc. Americans are known for their lifestyles of excess, to put it short. And before you ask, yes, I'm an American. I think this is simply people looking for an excuse to buy the new "Top of the line" systems. People will use Anything as an excuse to go buy something, when it comes down to it. Otherwise, organizations like The Home Shopping Network would never profit. "I already have three brooms, but that one has nifty rubber bristles that pick up hair!" and the like. So, if you want to get all Psychological on the situation, we're creatures of waste. =) Hell, if I had the money to do it, I'd donate the waxed PC and set the HDD on fire, then buy a completely new one too.

  28. Re:Premium subscription service by Monte · · Score: 2, Funny

    Shouldn't THEY pay YOU to find problems in the stories?

    Just the other day I made this very observation when I emailed an editor pointing out a grammatical error (usage of "your" instead of "you're") in a Mysterious Future post.

    Alas, no reply offering employment along these lines. Still, hope springs eternal.

  29. Re:offtopic by berboot · · Score: 4, Informative

    I have had to set up several new Dell's from scratch that lack a floppy drive, yet use SATA harddrive's. I have found that the easiest way is just to find the sata drivers and slipstream them into a SP2 installation disc.

    Instructions can be found all over google, and it typically takes less than an hour or so to make a good slipstream that you can use on most every computers' installation.

    Some links i had bookmarked: Here and here.

  30. Not because of cost. by xmorg · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Its not because people want to pay for a new PC. People will get spyware and not understanding how a computer works, they will think its broken. Unless they have kind geek friend to help them out they are pretty much screwed. ( ever tried calling in your computer manufacturer about spyware? )

    I know alot of people who will just throw it away, and be done with computers altogether (which may be why home PC business is doing so bad.

  31. Re:when will all you dupe Nazis.... by Pantero+Blanco · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I think that might be the editors' intention- to let people that missed an article the first time around have a shot at reading and commenting on it. Now, perhaps if they would post and LET PEOPLE KNOW that that was their intention, repeat articles wouldn't get flooded by 100 "It's a dupe" posts.

    Slashdot public opinion seems to be moving a bit in favor of the "It's a dupe!" crowd...Not that they're the majority, but where I saw -1 Redundant on all of the "dupe" posts a few months back, I'm seeing not only positive, but +4 and +5 moderations. If the editors are posting repeats with a plan in mind, they should say something, because it's obvious that a lot of people are regarding it as a problem.

  32. Re:offtopic by eljasbo · · Score: 3, Informative

    Check out NLite to slipstream service packs, hotfixes, answer files, and drivers. It works really well for all my custom windows disks. Get it here: http://www.nliteos.com/

  33. Re:W.....T......F... by Rick+Genter · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Well, if they guy makes $1000/hr, then if it takes Mr. Tucker more than 24 minutes to clean his PC, it is cheaper for him to buy a new one.

    Of course, then there's set-up time, application installation...make it two hours....

    --
    Don't underestimate the power of The Source
  34. Re:Cheap hardware makes for strange support option by DigiShaman · · Score: 2, Informative

    Heh, I'm sure you were just being funny. But on a serious note, if all the customer has are the OEM disks, then that's what must be used. I know ME sucks total ass, but I would never pirate XP (or any other piece of software) to a customer. Unless they are willing to pay for an upgraded OS...the software they have is all that gets upgraded.

    --
    Life is not for the lazy.
  35. Re:Cheap hardware makes for strange support option by Detritus · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Some computers need ME due to applications and/or device drivers that only run under 9X/ME. I used to have one. The manufacturer refused to release any softwafe updates that would allow it to work properly with Windows 2000 or Windows XP. They suggested that I buy a new computer.

    --
    Mea navis aericumbens anguillis abundat
  36. Re:offtopic by SyncNine · · Score: 2, Informative

    Most BIOSes now have the ability to accept USB devices as 'Legacy' keyboard and mouse devices. IE, my Micro$oft Bluetooth Wireless Keyboard and Mouse work perfectly in BIOS/Setup/etc -- Even though they connect through Bluetooth to the USB Bluetooth Dongle. All you need is to enable that support. Should work fine. Even on a Hell^H^H^H^HDell

    --
    To the darkened skies once more, and ever onward.
  37. Re:Cheap hardware makes for strange support option by writermike · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I know what you mean. I work in the field, too.

    But what most people don't realize is how much work they'll have if they get a new PC.

    Consider all the things that you've accumulated on your system and how much you've tweaked it -- settings, bookmarks, documents, serial keys, music, etc. You've had it for at least a year. And in all that time, you've done a lot with their PC. Do they know how to get all those settings and data to the new PC?

    Secondly, what about software? Most customers lose their original discs. Some systems don't even come with discs. Are they going to re-purchase everything? It's illegal to install an OEM Office onto a new PC. Will they buy a new Office? (No, they probably won't, but it's something you SHOULD bring up.)

    Third, there's hardware changes. What have they added? They will have to move that to the new PC, if it will work! (If the new system, for instance, had 768MB RAM and the new system uses a different type of RAM.)

    Fourth, what are they really getting with that system? There's a chance that the $199.99 powerhouse is anything but and may actually be SLOWER than what they have now!

    Finally, there's preventing this from happening again. Do they know how?

    They usually realize at this point that they're going to need help anyway. Since they can't perform these tasks, that means they're going to have to hire someone to do it. Suddenly a $199.99 PC is starting to look unrealistic.

    Of course, my OPINION is that it's better to repair than replace. I'm sure someone more clever can offer valid contrary arguments. I think replacement-as-policy (and I also put "rebuilds" under this category) is ultimately a longer road. I suggest it only if the new system is going to be much better out of the box.

    --
    If Nalgene water bottles are outlawed, only outlaws will have Nalgene water bottles.
  38. what bothers me about this by uncadonna · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Hardware is cheap, but as we all know most of the margin from these sales goes to microsoft. Talk about unfair. The people responsible for the mess get the benefit.

    The other thnig that bothers me is this constant reference to Apple's "3 per cent" market share. I swear the *majority* of computer users I see outside corporate settings are on macs; this includes a significant sampiling of 1) open sourcerers 2) cafe denizens 3) academics and 4) self-employed/very small business people. So what gives?

    Well, Apples last a long time. Suppose Apples last 3 times as long as PCs. (On the basis of this story, the ratio is probably increasing.) Then the actual market share in computer-months is about 9%, not 3%. Now suppose that Apple people actually LIKE their computers, and spend three times as much time with them. Then the user share is about 27%. About a quarter of the actual minutes people spend with computers would be with Macs. Accounting for hidebound corporations and government agencies this looks more like real life to me.

    --
    mt
  39. How About Adding This To The Editors Review Screen by Master+of+Transhuman · · Score: 2, Interesting

    (Use the Preview Button! Check those URLs! Check those fucking dupes!!! MORONS!!!)

    Important Stuff

    # Try to put *NEW* stories on the system instead of fucking dupes!!! MORONS!!!

    # Read other people's stories before posting your own to avoid simply duplicating what has already been said!!! MORONS!!!

    [Addition of the term "MORONS!!!" is my contribution to good user interface design.]

    --
    Richard Steven Hack - This sig is TOO GODDAMN SHORT TO DO ANYTHING USEFUL WITH! MORONS!
  40. it's like this... by Sfing_ter · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I tell my customers after a 15min. glance (free of charge), that they have 2 options:
    1) I clean it there (provided they have dsl), and it will take anywhere from 2-6 hours and after that it may still require a 2hr. re-install of the OS.
    OR
    2) I take it to my shop (where I can work on it and others and play Quake), and charge them a 2hrs. labor flat fee.

    Most choose 1, i don't know why I always recommend 2, because, hey, I love my Quake... :)

    When the bill is in the range that they could have gotten a new computer, they realize their mistake. However, I do set them up with a spyware blocker, MS' Official, Firefox for browsing (with a 5 minute WOW tutorial), and recommend them switching to Thunderbird for email, and recommend they purchase Norton for Anti-Virus (or update).

    (And yes, for most of them IE is their ISP... not kidding, 'I pay SBC, but Internet Explorer is my ISP...right?').

    I do what the customer asks, and when I point out that they are asking for the incorrect thing, they get indignant and demand their ignorance! So I provide them with that for which they ask.

    I have also had some who say 'Can't I just get a new computer and give this one to the kids?', why yes... or you could just have me get your data backed up, restore the os, and you can have it all back good as new for 2 hrs. labor... "NO, I want a new one", and so it goes.

    I got a free 1ghz. laptop that way, customer got angry said get my data off it and throw it in the trash. Passed my K6-500 compaq Lappy to my son,(Mepis 3.3.1), running good, and I get the new trash :)

    Saving data costs money and most people want that done even though they do not/will not do it before they have problems...

    What part of,"An emergency on your part does not constitute one on mine" do you not understand?

    --
    A computer once beat me at chess, but it was no match for me at kick boxing. Emo Philips
  41. Re:Am I running the same OS as these people? by Master+of+Transhuman · · Score: 2, Funny


    For starters, you need to go to some other Web site than MSN or the Microsoft intranet, Bill.

    --
    Richard Steven Hack - This sig is TOO GODDAMN SHORT TO DO ANYTHING USEFUL WITH! MORONS!
  42. Re:4 hours?!?!?!?! by Master+of+Transhuman · · Score: 2, Insightful


    It can take two IF you have EVERY freakin' tool available for deleting files that are heavily protected, hidden, etc. and you nail EVERY freakin' Registry key and hidden DLL on the system.

    Depending on the speed of the client's machine and how much hard disk he has, it can take one to two hours just to run a scan with ONE spyware tool. If you have to run more than one tool (almost always), there's at least another hour.

    THEN you have to find the stuff the tools DIDN'T find (almost always), THEN you have to clean off stuff that you found but which is hidden, protected from everything except System privilege, etc.

    Yes, it can easily take four hours. Which is why I charge $25/hour, not $90 - because most clients can't afford $90 for exactly the reason that it's ridiculous to spend $400 cleaning a $400 machine - or one they got free from a relative.

    --
    Richard Steven Hack - This sig is TOO GODDAMN SHORT TO DO ANYTHING USEFUL WITH! MORONS!
  43. Dupe by ozbon · · Score: 2, Informative

    Amazingly, no-one seems to have complained yet that this story is a dupe of this one from Sunday.

    That must be fairly newsworthy in itself!

    --
    I say we take off and nuke it from orbit. It's the only way to be sure...
  44. Misleading article -- or should I say, ad for Dell by Archon · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I believe the article misrepresents the options available to users.

    Someone who works in the internet industry and who holds a Ph.D. in computer science thought it "cheaper and faster" to buy another new PC running Windows. A director of a internet-related research group considers this a "rational response." Followed by a list of statistics related to Windows viruses, ad- and mal-ware. Then a professor of computer science at Yale, with another story of another infected Windows machine.

    Then a few paragraphs about Microsoft releasing software to combat the problem, noting 800 _million_ uses of the software this year alone, but then not offering any connection to how this affected the personal stories mentioned in the article. Not at all, I would guess, but then this isn't addressed.

    Then a story of a woman, a physician, solved her problem by buying a computer that doesn't run Windows. The case selected for this inclusion used nearly the most expensive possible option available, a top-end Macintosh laptop at $3K. The final two stories listed a stockbroker who is at "wits' [sic] end" and considering a new Windows-based PC purchase, and a bank manager who was the only one to clean their own computer of the offending software, albeit via a 15+ hour process of self-education and work.

    So what does a reader of this story who doesn't know that much about computers (ie, most users) learn? That very smart, very well-educated people -- even those that are computer professionals, are throwing their old Windows computers out and buying new ones because it's just too complicated or troublesome to fix the old ones. This behavior isn't questioned, but bolstered by the declaration of an important-sounding research group that claims this is a "rational response." And even if you do replace your Windows computer, it'll get infected all over again.

    The one person who buys something else other than Windows has to pay $3000 for it. The other person who teaches themselves to remove the infection and hopefully combat it successfully in the future must go through hours of self-teaching and work.

    However, the fact that this virus, mal- and ad-ware epidemic only exists on Windows is not discussed. Linux is not discussed. That the woman who bought a $3000 Macintosh could have bought a $500 Macintosh that would have offered her the same safety is not discussed. Hell, even the option of inserting a restore CD and returning the computer back to the way it was delivered to the owner is not discussed.

    These are all valid options. I'm not a Ph.D., a physician, or member of a research firm so maybe my opinions don't mean as much. I'm not an employee of a Windows-based PC manufacturer (I will mention though that I the ad that I had to click through to read this article was for Dell). But I use a Macintosh, and have used them exclusively for the past 10+ years, and have never had a single infestation. Ever. So what do I know.

    Oh yeah, that I have options. Successful, inexpensive options that were completely overlooked in this article. And after reading the article, if I didn't know any better (and ran Windows), I'd be far more likely to buy a new computer to replace my old infected PC. Maybe even with a new... umm... Dell?