Slashdot Mirror


Remote-Controlled Robots Explore 'Lost City'

Roland Piquepaille writes "A large team of oceanographers is again exploring 'Lost City,' an hydrothermal vent field located in the middle of the Atlantic Ocean, which was discovered in 2000 and named like this because of the myth of Atlantis. But this time, the oceanographers are not on a ship. Most of them are in a room at the University of Washington in Seattle. And according to this article from the Seattle Post-Intelligencer, they're using high-speed Internet connections to control robotic vehicles exploring the deep Atlantic Ocean thousands of miles away. Thanks to satellites, the remotely operated vehicles (ROVs) Argus and Hercules can transmit videos back to Seattle in real time. After analysis, the scientists can move the ROVs to specific areas of interest without having their feet wet. Read more for other details, references and pictures about this project."

147 comments

  1. Hmm.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I see the Slashdot editors have finally $RTBL'd the entire Slashdot userbase. Wonderful.

  2. go UW by MuNansen · · Score: 1

    reason #3402 why WA > all. :P

    Sorry, I'm just proud.

    1. Re:go UW by John+Hurliman · · Score: 1

      That would be the Republican half of Washington (everything east of the Cascades) talking.

    2. Re:go UW by Danger+Stevens · · Score: 1

      Ah, a Cougar I figure? Well, if you currently attend or are an alumnus of Washington State I'll forgive you because you're almost certainly drunk right now.
      I've never seen so much liquor as I saw in Pullman when a bunch of bored veterinarian students saw the shit get kicked out of their [insert any sport] team by us Huskies.

      --
      World Changing - News for Humans, Stuff about our planet
    3. Re:go UW by Danger+Stevens · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Seriously, the UW has some bragging rights. The 'Cyclotron Shop' in north campus boasts the most powerful electromagnet on the west coast. It's powerful enough that one of the standard physics projects is to watch it levitate frogs in midair.

      Glad to see they keep trying new things.

      --
      World Changing - News for Humans, Stuff about our planet
    4. Re:go UW by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Reason #3402 huh? Must be a pretty sitty reason, so why do I care.

    5. Re:go UW by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Too bad your football team sucks.

      -With love from the SEC

    6. Re:go UW by halber_mensch · · Score: 1

      I've never seen so much liquor as I saw in Pullman when a bunch of bored veterinarian students saw the shit get kicked out of their [insert any sport] team by us Huskies.

      And thus we reveal the true reason for the proliferation of sports in academic institutions. A university can only afford the time and cost to support so many research projects, but it always has alumni money to buy bigger athletes.

      --
      perl -e "eval pack(q{H*},join q{},qw{70 72696e74207061636b28717b482a7d2c717b343 637323635363534323533343430617d293b})"
    7. Re:go UW by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And Microsoft is reason #1 why WA sucks.

      Sorry,....well, actually I'm not.

    8. Re:go UW by multiplexo · · Score: 1
      That would be the Republican half of Washington (everything east of the Cascades) talking.

      Yes, that would be the Republican half of Washington, (everything east of the Cascades that isn't paying a fair share of state taxes and is heavily subsidized by King and Pierce counties) talking.

      --
      cheap labor conservatives - they want to keep you hungry enough to be thankful for minimum wage.
    9. Re:go UW by CarpetShark · · Score: 1

      You're also incomprehensible.

  3. OT: Moderation system needs work by prof_peabody · · Score: 1

    Thanks to the moderation war for the upcoming interview

    http://interviews.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=05/0 8/02/0345212&tid=109&tid=11

    none of the other topics are being modded, forcing us to trudge through hundreds of troll posts and useless jibba-jabba.

    FIX THE MOD SYSTEM PLEASE!

    1. Re:OT: Moderation system needs work by (Score+0+Funny) · · Score: 1

      I could only dream of a (Score 0 Funny) moderation.

    2. Re:OT: Moderation system needs work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dude, reading your comments, I'm not suprized you're having trouble 'recovering'.

      You just don't say anything the least bit interesting or intelligent.

      Go read a book instead.

  4. Hmmmm..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    remote control vehicles exploring hydrothermal vent fields...

    The Slashdot offices?

  5. Good results... by Lectrik · · Score: 1

    up until the network gets bogged down with porn and Halo and CS

    --
    --- As to make my comment seem, by comparison, more intelegent... doodie doodie doodie poop poop poop!
  6. Remote Controlled robots by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Remote controlled to make a first post

  7. Spambots? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If they were running Windows, that would bring new meaning to the term spambot...

  8. 1800s robot anecdote by Sheetrock · · Score: 1
    After a hearty discussion in AI class about the famous 3 robot rules, our professor related an interesting metaphor for why artifical sentience must be restrained.

    It seems that back in the late 1800's in America (mentioning this for non-U.S. /.ers) there was this saloon in the West that was kind of a run-down, ramshackle joint that was frequented by a few loyal patrons and not too many others. I think it was California, but it could have been Oregon or someplace similar -- well, the location isn't really relevant to the story but if you're interested you may be able to dig a bit on Google to find out. Basically, while the saloon didn't go out of its way to publicize itself to out-of-towners (not much point given that it was in a remote area) it managed to do a fairly steady trade despite the occasional brawl that caused property damage and the persistent requests from a particular fellow for free drinks.

    More nights than not, the proprietor of the saloon would watch this drunk come wandering in through the doors, sit down, and lay a line on him about how he's trying to pull things together and how he'd just make enough to keep himself in beans and couldn't the bartender just pour him a shot or two to fuzz the edges and whatnot. And again, more nights than not, the bartender would take pity on the poor guy and pull out the whiskey.

    Now, mind you, this went on for some time, and while the bartender was an easy mark even he had his limit. So one night, after the bartender already gave the fellow three shots on the house, he decides to cut the guy off.

    "Look," he says, "while I'm really sorry to hear that things still aren't working out for you I don't think that I can keep giving you free drinks. I've got to make ends meet too, you know."

    So the drunk says, "I don't suppose you've got anything I can do to get another drink tonight?"

    The proprietor, not particularly wanting this fellow to hang around all night and certainly not expecting him to take him up on his proposition, says "Well, you see that spittoon over there? If you take a swig out of that I suppose I could give you a drink to wash it down."

    No sooner did he finish his last sentence than the drunk walked over to the spittoon and hefted it off of the floor. Before the bartender could stop him, the fellow put the rim to his lips, tipped the bottom of the metal container up into the air, and began to swallow. To the bartender's dismay, the guy continued to slowly chug the thick contents of the spittoon. When he had finally gulped the final remnants of the container, he threw it to the ground, wiped off his lips with his shirt cuff, and gagged, "So, do I get the drink?"

    "You can have the bottle!" exclaimed the bartender, immediately pouring the first shot. "But tell me, why did you swallow the whole damn thing? You only needed to swig it to earn the drink."

    And the drunk replies: "It was all one long string."

    --

    Try not. Do or do not, there is no try.
    -- Dr. Spock, stardate 2822-3.




    1. Re:1800s robot anecdote by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't get it!

  9. Science, with clean hands by ReformedExCon · · Score: 2, Insightful

    There was a quote that really struck me as odd and out of place in a science department.

    quote
    "This is how the science is going to be done," said Deborah Kelley, a University of Washington oceanographer. /quote

    I can't believe that a scientist would forego the adventure and excitement of actually visiting and investigating on-site the things she wants to learn about. Robots and video cameras and sensors have their place, especially in areas where it is still impossible to go. However, replacing the actual experience of seeing these things firsthand, trading that for lily-white labcoats and sterile research labs is the opposite direction scientists should be heading, in my opinion.

    I, for one, would rather head down to the depths of the ocean or fly to the next planet personally than have some robot do that in my place, if I had the choice.

    --
    Jesus saved me from my past. He can save you as well.
    1. Re:Science, with clean hands by Shag · · Score: 1

      Sad but true, if you ask me.

      I do different kinds of support work at two astronomical observatories. Both are at 4200 meters, with air pressure of about 0.6 atmospheres - not quite the sort of place everyone can just hang around indefinitely, but most folks can handle it after acclimatizing.

      At the larger of the two, basically the only people on the summit at night are operators and technical support staff - all the observers and other scientists are about 3000 meters lower, down at headquarters.

      The smaller one's even worse in the hands-on sense - about seventy percent of the time, there's nobody in the facility during observing runs. It's totally remotely controllable; the operator is just above sea level, and the observer could be... well... anywhere. Typically about 200 miles away at the university's main campus, or on the other side of the planet entirely. We're only on the summit if an observer specifically requests it, or if there's some unusual instrument that we need to be around in case of problems.

      Some might say it doesn't matter where we are, since astro support work typically gets explained as "long periods of nothing punctuated by brief bursts of absolute panic." But the sunsets are so much prettier at high altitude. :)

      --
      Village idiot in some extremely smart villages.
    2. Re:Science, with clean hands by jericho4.0 · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Robots are cheaper, safer, and expendable. I hope that no deep sea researcher ever misses out on going to the bottom a few times, but that same reseacher can get 100 times the work done useing robots.

      It's the same for space travel. Just because it's romantic to have humans in space, doesn't mean it's a good idea to blow 90% of our space budget on LEO manned 'missions'.

      --
      "A language that doesn't affect the way you think about programming, is not worth knowing" - Alan Perlis
    3. Re:Science, with clean hands by crimoid · · Score: 1

      I hope my tax dollars are not paying for someone's "adventure and excitement" when said person could use technology to get just as much work done (if not more) at a fraction of the cost.

      Now if said scientist wants to go be Indiana Jones on their own dime (or the dime of a private company), I'm all for it.

    4. Re:Science, with clean hands by ReformedExCon · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I am not sure I can agree with your position, though I agree with your sentiment. I don't think I implied that robots ought to be shunned in favor of sending humans to do a job. Robots indeed have their place, as do computers, calculators, and every other technology that makes exploring and researching more fruitful. But I do not think that technology is the be-all and end-all in science. It may be helpful to overcome barriers, but at the core it is humans who must make the final fateful decisions. And a human who is on-site can make a better snap decision than one who is away in a laboratory staring at a video monitor with a 3 second delay between his commands and the robot's actions.

      I understand your unwillingness to want to pay for such "extravagancies". Just as you don't want to pad some scientist's budget, I perhaps do not want to pad some artist's funding. However, a government that works best is one that helps the society it governs progress with as little human suffering as possible and at the lowest cost to its citizens. As such, I have to think that it would be far more proper to have informed people making the decision as to how to spend allocated funds rather than trusting each citizen to specifically designate where each penny of their taxes goes. Universities have a much better perspective than the common layperson when it comes to scientific research, and I think it ought to be they who make the decision as to how to spend allocated government funds.

      Science is absolutely about adventure and excitement. It is the excitement of discovering something new, of finding something that no one has ever found before, of creating something that no one has ever created before. Science is about getting "out there" and finding stuff. It sustains itself with people who are excited about finding stuff. You can't take that away and give it to the robots and expect to have scientists lining up to fill the labs forever.

      --
      Jesus saved me from my past. He can save you as well.
    5. Re:Science, with clean hands by JanneM · · Score: 2, Informative

      In this case, what's the difference, really? If you go "there" in person, you're still looking out through a thick glass window (or, more likely, at a monitor), and manipulating the world around you with buttons, joysticks and other remote controls.

      The difference really is, when you're there in person you're only in control of one (large, cumbersome) exploring unit, you can explore for a lot shorter time (since so much resources is spent on keeping you alive), and you waste hours just traveling down, then up again. Oh, and due to safety reasons and a far larger, more fragile craft, you won't be able to take the same risks or all the same observations you can remotely.

      Much of science hasn't been "hands on" for years or decades. Mostly, it's not a loss. It may be romantic to freeze your ass off on some mountain top with a telescope, but there is again little point when all your observations and data analysis is done off-site anyway. And it's not only in exploratory science either; just check out the state of automation in a chemistry lab today. Then check out the life expectancy of an experimental organic chemist and you'll see a reason automation is a good thing.

      --
      Trust the Computer. The Computer is your friend.
    6. Re:Science, with clean hands by Locke2005 · · Score: 2, Informative

      You have obviously never actually experienced a 7 hour commute to the ocean floor to do a few hours work, followed by a 48 hour decompression period. And by the way, given that the pressure is several atmosheres, you're pretty much forced to do everything by remote control anyway, even if your are in a sub! Given a choice of sitting around 80% of the time doing nothing, or working by remote control, I think I would choose remote control. Unless, of course, we're exploring the Dallas Cheerleaders' locker room... some things you just have to do by hand!

      --
      I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
    7. Re:Science, with clean hands by Moofie · · Score: 1

      And if you don't have the choice?

      Note that he said "This is the way science will be done", not "This is the way I'd rather do science".

      I'm all for manned exploration of everything, but robots is pretty cheap.

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
  10. Makes sense by saskboy · · Score: 1

    After almost a decade of Internet broadcast exploration of Mars, it just makes sense to start exploring hard-to-reach places on our own planet with remote controls. Slap on some virtual reality goggles, and away they go. One small step for a scientist, one giant leap for man kind.

    --
    Saskboy's blog is good. 9 out of 10 dentists agree.
    1. Re:Makes sense by sillybilly · · Score: 1

      One giant leap in your lovelife too. Soon you won't have to do your wife in person, but use a remote controlled gadget. Slap on some virtual reality goggles too, and you won't see how fat she got, and she won't see how bald you got, since the two of you said 'I do.'

    2. Re:Makes sense by Sigg3.net · · Score: 1

      >it just makes sense to start exploring hard-to-reach places on our own planet with remote controls.
      Yes. I've been doing it for years.
      With my Logitech webcam that has a small maglite attached, I've used hi-tech technology to check for dust under my bed.

    3. Re:Makes sense by krunk4ever · · Score: 1

      like how they have virtual sex in demolition man?
      http://home1.gte.net/res0mrb7/widescreen/demolitio n/

    4. Re:Makes sense by saskboy · · Score: 1

      But what remote technolgy do you use to remove the dust when it's found, or is it purely an observatory mission? I'd recommend a remote controlled flat vacuum I forget what the brandname is but it's something like ROOVER.

      --
      Saskboy's blog is good. 9 out of 10 dentists agree.
    5. Re:Makes sense by Sigg3.net · · Score: 1

      I only have a single bed (size 1.5 comparing to a double bed, but still) so lying on it, using the long vacuumcleaner "rod", I get there easily. This way, combining technology and physics, I have acclaimed the possibility of cleaning dust from under my bed without leaving it.

  11. hrm.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Shouldnt that be 'a hydrothermal...' I don't believe anyone pronounces hydrothermal 'eye-dro-thermal' even with the worst of cockney accents.
    -shrug-

    1. Re:hrm.. by RNelson · · Score: 1

      Stewie Griffin: Now listen to me, we've got five days left.
      Stewie Griffin: I'll not lose my wager. Now repeat after me.
      Stewie Griffin: "Hello, Mother. Have you hidden my hatchet?"
      Eliza Pinchley: "'Allo, Mother. 'Ave you 'idden my 'atchet?"
      Stewie Griffin: God, no! It's an "H" sound, you moron!

  12. Timothy = Roland? by Saeed+al-Sahaf · · Score: 1

    Yet another Roland story posted by WHO ELSE? Timothy. Is Timothy ACTUALLY Roland? Well, I for one have NEVER seen both of them in the same room at the same time, so I think that about says it all...

    --
    "Who are in control, they are not in control of anything - they don't even control themselves!" - Glen Beck
    1. Re:Timothy = Roland? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Roland's articles are nothing more than links to his lame blog. The blog that just paraphrases news stories he reads.

      Roland is a tool.

    2. Re:Timothy = Roland? by Max+Romantschuk · · Score: 1

      For whatever reason everyone seems that bashing Roland is mandatory... Mostly because his site has ads. But so do most other sites out there, especially the big ones.

      Roland's stories are quite simply better quality than a lot of the stuff posted on Slashdot. If you hate him so much then just ignore the stories, quit bitching about it.

      --
      .: Max Romantschuk :: http://max.romantschuk.fi/
    3. Re:Timothy = Roland? by Saeed+al-Sahaf · · Score: 1

      Sure fine. But what is the relationship between TIMOTHY and ROLAND?

      --
      "Who are in control, they are not in control of anything - they don't even control themselves!" - Glen Beck
    4. Re:Timothy = Roland? by Max+Romantschuk · · Score: 1

      But what is the relationship between TIMOTHY and ROLAND?

      I have no idea. But does it matter? Timothy is an editor, it is perfectly within his rights to choose which stories he posts. Slashdot doesn't exactly have some elaborate social contract controlling what gets posted and what doesn't.

      --
      .: Max Romantschuk :: http://max.romantschuk.fi/
    5. Re:Timothy = Roland? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But you are missing one vital point dear sir...

      ROLAND PIQUEPAILLE IS A SON OF A BITCH

    6. Re:Timothy = Roland? by Adam9 · · Score: 1

      He doesn't seem as evil as people depict him to be after I read this.

    7. Re:Timothy = Roland? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Slashdot doesn't exactly have some elaborate social contract controlling what gets posted and what doesn't

      Yes it does. It came into effect the second /. started charging for subscriptions, some editorial standards and value is expected. If it turns out that instead of paying Slashdot you could just be reading Roland's blog - then what's the point paying for a /. subscription when all it does is host comments about Roland's blog? And who would be ripping who off? (Roland? Slashdot? Paying readers? Unpaiding readers?)

    8. Re:Timothy = Roland? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't think most people are "bashing" Roland because of the ads on his site, most web pages /. links to have ads. I think that most people don't like Roland because he used to copy and paste other people's articles in full on his blog and maybe add some meaningless commentary. So in that sense it is quite ridiculous that he has advertisements since he is getting all of the revenue with none of the effort.

      In all fairness what he does now is (in my opinion) perfectly fine, he put a link to his blog at the bottom, whatever fine, he also put the link to the original article in the forefront. His commentary is better now as well.

      If Roland were to change his name and domain I doubt anyone would complain anymore, but the fact is he tarnished his name by making money off of other people's work, something that isn't easily forgotten.

      That said, I don't hold any grudges (although it is strange that Timothy is always the one accepting his submissions). *shrug*

    9. Re:Timothy = Roland? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, it seems quite justified..

      This Roland guy is a spammer, pure and simple. He plagarizes articles (he only recently started putting the "Source" at the bottom of his articles, which is still incomplete) and then whores out his website to all the tech websites so he can make a few bucks and get attention.

      Of course, if you're going to judge Roland by how loud he cries "Wolf", then what does it matter? You're already in love with him to begin with.

      I for one think he deserves what he gets.. He spams the internet, he gets spammed in return. LOL, justice.

  13. Atlantis... by Samah · · Score: 1

    But isn't Atlantis in the Pegasus Galaxy? :)

    --
    Homonyms are fun!
    You're driving your car, but they're riding their bikes there.
    1. Re:Atlantis... by ThePuD · · Score: 0

      they control it with the ancient stones. it's no biggie.

    2. Re:Atlantis... by AndroidCat · · Score: 1

      I thought you had to have the Ancient Jeans too?

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
    3. Re:Atlantis... by zioncity · · Score: 1

      Maybe this is a future Atlantis that the Wrath finally got from the Atlantis team and flew it back to Earth, but knowing the Wrath do not have mastery of very fast hyperspace travel... they most likely screwed up flying the city to Earth by flying into an unstable rogue wormhole, yeah a big one,... and went back in time like many many kazillion years and crashed on Earth... then with it having all that time to rust, rot and decay... would look like old stone ruins perhaps... or maybe... nah... hehe

  14. Real Time? by lakiolen · · Score: 1

    I guess a 2-3 second delay each way through the satellites is real enough for most people.

    --


    What are you expecting to find here?
    1. Re:Real Time? by Max+Romantschuk · · Score: 1

      It is real time. There's a lag, but it's still real time. Even the Mars rovers are real time, but with a bigger lag... ;)

      Non-real time is stuff that idles/qets queued before commands get executed.

      --
      .: Max Romantschuk :: http://max.romantschuk.fi/
  15. Atlantis? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Atlantis... a ridiculous liberal myth.

  16. What the drunk did next: He ate some fried chicken by (Score+0+Funny) · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    The drunk ate some fried chicken...

    The breasts were juicy, and the buns were soft and warm, he thought.

    Afterwards, the division manager of Popeyes came up to the drunk's table and asked him how the meal was. He said he was satisfied, but the meal lacked a certain je ne sais quoi. The mananger apologized profusely, and said he had something to show the drunk that would make up for it.

    The manager lead the drunk to the back of the popeyes, to a room soaked from floor to ceiling in blood. In the center of it was a live horse, chained by all four legs to the structural supports of the warehouse like room. As the drunk watched, employees of the popeyes cut large sections from the horse, which was whinneying and screaming in horror, the remaining sections of its body covered with festering sores and a froth of sweat.

    The popeyes employees took the chunks of horseflesh and sliced them into pieces, then they rooted around through the bags of trash strewn around the room to find discarded chicken bones. They quickly tenderized the meat with sledgehammers and fed it into a machine which formed the horsemeat around the bones, then they breaded and deepfried it.

    The drunk asked the division manager why he had led him back to this place, and the manager pointed at the steed's rump, the diseased asshole puckering rythmically with terror, squirting pus with each convulsion. "We're just about to use that section, would you like a crack at it first?"

    The drunk quickly unzipped his pants and wasted no time jamming his erect penis into the stallion's defenseless asshole. With each thrust, the drunk donkey punched the horse in the back of the head, making it clench its ass even tighter. The drunk came just as the horse died and was delighted. Popeyes definitely went the extra mile to make the drunk a satisfied customer..

    The end?

  17. Robotic Voyeurs. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm waiting for this technology to become cheap enough I can be a "peeping tom" from the safety of my basement.

    1. Re:Robotic Voyeurs. by AndroidCat · · Score: 1

      Buy one of these R/C UFOs and find a fly-weight WiFi camera that it can lift. (Better kill the LED strobes if you're peeping at night.)

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
  18. hmm by Joe+the+Lesser · · Score: 1

    I think I need one of these in my house. Then I could explore the back of my fridge without having to deal with the smell.

    --
    "I only speak the truth"
    Karma: null(Mostly affected by an unassigned variable)
  19. From the Article: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    "Think of it as the Mars Rover but at the bottom of the ocean..."


    That's like saying, "Think of it as Linux, but running using NTFS."

  20. Re:Roland Piquepaille and Slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Mod parent up.

  21. Oh No! The drunk gets arrested. His plea for help: by (Score+0+Funny) · · Score: 1

    Dear Dr. Goatse,

    I am writing to you because I am in need of legal assistance. I am currently charged with murder, burglary, terrorism, and a wide variety of charges. The story behind these accusations is somewhat longwinded, but I will attempt to describe it below:

    It all started when I was a child. I was the victim of sexual abuse by a deranged, obese, elderly babysitter. This man would babysit for me when my parents went on long vacations. As soon as they left, my normally cozy home turned into a sordid den of gay rape and bestiality. The old man, who by coincidence shared the name Ike with another famous gay man from a different troll, would act normally for a few hours after my parents departed. Soon, however, he would ask me to come sit on the sofa with him and watch television. While we watched the good old sitcoms on television, he would slowly move his wrinkled old hand onto my leg. I was too small and too scared to object, and he wouldn't have cared anyway, so I ignored him and continued to watch the TV. He massage my legs, moving in higher and higher circles with his warm, delicate touch. Eventually he would come to my buttocks, where he would slide his weathered hands into my shorts and continue his massage. At this point it would become very difficult for me to watch my shows, as he would squeeze my tender young asscheeks while breathing heavily (I think the sexual excitment presented some problems for him and his pacemaker). At some point, he would flick off the TV and pull my pants off, then my shirt. His semi-bald head glistened in the afternoon sun, and his white hair was matted to his head with his sweat. He would turn me over, and continue his massage. I didn't look back at him as we would get angry if I did anything other than staring ahead and pretending that nothing was happening.

    Zzzzzzzzip! His zipper, with its sound easily susceptible to onomatopoeia, flew open. A few seconds later, his shining manhood flew outwards. My young asshole would clench in nervous anticipation of his anal invasion with his nine hard, throbbing, inches of man-meat. I could hear his weazing breath as he coughed some saliva onto his penis, rubbing it to make up for its geriatric lack of virility. While he aroused himself for his rectal piracy, he slid a finger into my clenched anus. Initially, the pain seemed unbearable; however, as time went on, I gradually relaxed and even came to shove my small boyish behind back onto his intruding finger, aching for prostate stimulation. Soon it was time: he withdrew his finger, and prepped his hard manhood for its intestinal odyssey into my backdoor. My bay breath quickened, and thoughts of his cragged, veined old manhood filled my mind like a Kreskin's semen in BSD's dying bowels. I felt a warm touch against my cheeks, and soon the head of his mantruder was nestled inside of my gripping sphincter. I gasped as his throbbing virility inched into my rear passages. Slowly but surely all of his nine inches invaded my bum, and I was left impaled on him. As I mentioned, he was quite obese, so his flabby, pasty stomach with its green varicrose veins were pressed against my young back. At this point my eyes bugged out of my head as his cock buggered into my asshole. Soon the pumping began: there was some pain, and while it did multiply as time went on, the pleasure grew too, but at an exponential rate. Taking into account other factors, the overall satisfaction could be measured by the equation S(x) = GAMMA(x) - 20x, where GAMMA is the standard gamma function. As you can see, it would be only a short time (about 6 seconds) before I was in throes of esctacy. Alas; all good things must come to an end, and soon Ike was ready to shoot his seed deep into my poop chute. As his semen shot forth into the deep, moist unknown, I moaned "Oh yes!" with such a force that I could have burst through a brick wall and dispensed sugary beverages such as Kool-aid and Capri-Sun. His steaming stringy semen oozed its way in reverse through my digestive system. At this point, Ike's old heart wa

  22. No direct link ROV Seattle by tenco · · Score: 1

    Am i the only one who first thought of a direct link between the ROV's and Seattle when reading the arcticle? What made me wonder: H2O doesnt let EM-waves go very far. Thus a ROV has a cable connection to it's mothership. But this draft should make it clear how it really is.

  23. AWWZ YEA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    BOOYA!!!! In the face of Roland Piquepaille, IN THE FACE!!!

  24. Re:Roland Piquepaille and Slashdot by Ex+Machina · · Score: 1
  25. OT: I think attacking this guy is lame by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As you can read from his blog here, someone has been spamming this guy with various methods. I think that is lame.

    If you don't like his links, then don't read them! If you're jealous of the small AdSense revenue he makes per article, make up your own blog and start submitting it to Slashdot.

    Or better yet, start your own tech blog.

    1. Re:OT: I think attacking this guy is lame by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      people dont like him because he copy and pastes other peoples content vertabim without permission

      other "blogs" just link to a particular article they want to dicuss they dont just take images and text from the original site anyway,
      people here feel pretty strongly about copyright, if Roland doesnt want trouble he should stop ripping original writers/photographers/magazines/sites off and create the damm content himself (but that would mean work)

      it would be a pretty shit web if everyone took his attitude and just profited from copying other peoples creative work without permission

      so fuck Roland , you reap what you sow

    2. Re:OT: I think attacking this guy is lame by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Roland, your self promotion and lack of shame is pitiful.

      If your AdSense revenue is small, then why would I be jealous?

      You don't get it: We don't want to read your articles. We're sick of your plagarism and drivel. We're sick of seeing this blatant spam on Slashdot (yet you complain about people spamming you, how rich!).

      I will be targeting your email box in the near future. I just haven't been assed to write the script to fuck you up that way yet.

      Failing that, Roland, I will have my friend run a DDoS (if you don't know what that is, look it up you stupid dipshit) attack on your websites any any server associated with you. This WILL shut you down, becuase the sheer amount of bandwidth I can have directed at you will overwhelm just about any website.

    3. Re:OT: I think attacking this guy is lame by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The parent AC was not Roland, you moron.

    4. Re:OT: I think attacking this guy is lame by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Roland, your failed attempts at hiding yourself are not going to fool anyone here.

  26. Via internet? by El+Jynx · · Score: 1

    Now crossing over a deep sinkhole... *bzzz*

    -Error 404, Connection timed out-

    AAAARGH!!

    Is that what happened to the first mars probe? :P

    --
    A positive attitude may not solve all your problems, but it will annoy enough people to make it well worth the effort.
    1. Re:Via internet? by ultranova · · Score: 1

      -Error 404, Connection timed out-

      Error 404 means "page not found". Connection timeout cannot, logically speaking, have an error number, since error numbers are returned by the web server, and connection timing out results in the connection to the server being lost, and the server cannot return error codes to a client it has no connection to.

      Is that what happened to the first mars probe? :P

      Nope, that was the blue ray of death shot by the green alien of evil in the red planet of war.

      --

      Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

    2. Re:Via internet? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wrong again, but closer, 404 is 'file not found'

  27. This was on the DSC channel by hobotron · · Score: 1

    With James Cameron, or someone. I really dont remember. Oh and since the moderation system is as broke as Brooke Shields, Id like to give a big fuck all you guys because I have excelent karma.

    --
    There is truth in humor.
    1. Re:This was on the DSC channel by DanielNS84 · · Score: 1

      *Pseudo-Mods +1 Insightful in his mind...*

    2. Re:This was on the DSC channel by sillybilly · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      How do you know it's broke? I guess slasdhot is becoming just a bit too much of a nuisance to the powers that be.

    3. Re:This was on the DSC channel by sillybilly · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Come to think of it, me neither. I used to get points too, all I can do is metamoderate these days, and the items seem just a bit too 'hand picked', damned if you do, damned if you don't, it's neither right, nor wrong, but both true insightful sentences and completey wrong sentences in a blender, where I simply have to leave it unmodded. If there was a way to highlight portions of a post, mod it up, into a different color, then highlight other portions and mod it down. But then to those reading it would read like nothing coherent, and someone's words could be taken way out of context. There are still people with mod points, However I saw 'spicy' stories that had no moderation at all, then stupid ones full of mods, so something is up. I wonder who dishes out the mod points, and who comes up with the metamod stuff. To just let it randomly generate instead of using it to test somebody, well, there is too much temptation. Market surveys where you pay someone on the phone to dial up someone else, and harass them into expressing an honest opinion, those don't come anywhere close in honesty thus value, compared to what you can do on slashdot, by simply submitting a person something to metamoderate for you. Too much money or marketing survey effort at stake not to abuse such stuff.

  28. What's that clever thing people say? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    since the moderation system is...broke...Id like to give a big fuck all you guys because I have excelent karma.

    Karma's a bitch.

  29. not real time by SuperBanana · · Score: 1
    It is real time. There's a lag

    Then it is NOT real-time. You clearly don't understand the term.

    From The Jargon File: "Describes an application which requires a program to respond to stimuli within some small upper limit of response time (typically milli- or microseconds)."

    Good ol' Roland misapplied the term, or the article author did.

    1. Re:not real time by JanneM · · Score: 2, Informative

      The critical parameter is "upper limit". Hard real-time systems are fairly slow; what they have is that they _guarantee_ a response within some time limit. Every time. Soft real-time systems would typically have one limit stating the maximum allowable average response rate, and a second, higher limit stating the maximum allowable ever. "real time" implies that the system won't let the world "get ahead"; things will not get queued further and further afield without limit.

      Nothing in the concept of "real-time" does it say the response has to be fast. Consistent, yes, but not fast. If you have a system guaranteeing a response within ten seconds, every time, that is real-time.

      --
      Trust the Computer. The Computer is your friend.
    2. Re:not real time by CarpetShark · · Score: 1

      Every real-world use I've ever seen of the term requires the reponse to be fast.

  30. ew by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I was hoping this was a continuation of the joke. But instead it made me throw up a little in my mouth.

  31. Re:What the drunk did next: He ate some fried chic by dextroz · · Score: 1

    me neither... there sure are some sick bastards on /. and it goes to explain a long way why so many of you mofos are single too!

    --
    Where's my free iPod!? Until then, I'll settle for a kiss...
  32. Re:Roland Piquepaille and Slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Uh... so you're upset that Roland makes a (gasp!) whopping $30 per business day? Posting articles on slasdork, that people (oh shit!) like to read and comment on?

    You sir, have a basic mis-understanding on the value of money, and the basis of capitalism. $647/month won't even pay rent in a shabby apartment here in California.

    OMFG! Slashdot conspiracy uncovered! Profiteering at sub-minimum wages! Sound the alarms! /SARCASM

    Gimme a bag...

  33. Re:I just ate some fried chicken. by King_of_Prussia · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Michael Jackson is that you?

    --

    Making the moon less necessary since 1998.

  34. This is truly a first. by mcrbids · · Score: 1

    70 comments, and NOT ONE has made it to a modlevel of 3.

    I wonder if this will be a first?

    Anyway, I really wonder what the big deal is. If you have a robot with a computer control, what's the big deal if that control computer is managed by an SSH connection?

    I spend ~ 6-10 hours per day managing a computer about 200 miles from my home, from my home, with a laptop, while watching my kids swim in the pool in my backyard patio.

    Other than the bandwidth involved with video, what's the difference?

    --
    I have no problem with your religion until you decide it's reason to deprive others of the truth.
  35. Daleks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    One step closer to us all being Daleks. Fat zitty gross computer geeks who send robots out to the adventure site.

    Kids, cool toy... but Richard Burton ya aint.

    glad for the innovation... but laaaaame.

    I'd pick a ride on the Trieste any day over a trip down to the oceanography department by the montlake cut.

    Maybeeee all the research into mother nature isn't changing the way the world thinks because the researchers are more and more trying to avoid going into mother nature to experience her.

    Lame.

  36. Take it to the Roland by dj245 · · Score: 1

    Hit him where it hurts- in the pocketbook. I go to his site, find the biggest, fattest, jpeg he is hosting at the moment, and then load just that picture once every 2 seconds using Opera's "reload every ..." feature. Over 24 hours it can add up to a couple of gigabytes. If many people did this it would quickly put a stop to these Roland Slashdot shenanigans.

    --
    Even those who arrange and design shrubberies are under considerable economic stress at this period in history.
    1. Re:Take it to the Roland by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      whatever you do don't run this on a OC/E3 pipe

      bash-2.01 $ while [ true ] ; do wget -O - http://www.primidi.com/ > /dev/null ; done

      because that would be terrible

  37. Could they publish the IP of ROV, by heitikender · · Score: 0

    so we could slashdot it? Please?

  38. Who has the movie rights? by AndroidCat · · Score: 1
    It could work. Argus and Hercules, two lovable explorer/archaeologist robots. Argus sounds like the thinker of the two, and Hercules is the strong impulsive one. Could one of them carry a bullwhip?

    Indiana Joins, Robots of the Last Lost Temple of Atlantis Doom Crusade!

    --
    One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
  39. More information about the "Lost City" vents by flabbergasted · · Score: 1

    Do the lack of information about the actual dive site in the article, I went out looking for more information. You'll find more information here http://lostcity.jason.org/

  40. I gotta move by museumpeace · · Score: 1

    If they can get high speed internet in middle of the atlantic ocean but I can't even get DSL in most of my zipcode, its time to go.

    --
    SLASHDOT: news for people who can't concentrate on work or have no life at all and got tired of yelling back at the TV.
  41. A clarification, please by wowbagger · · Score: 1

    Whenever I see an article like "$FOO performed over high speed Internet link" I always want to ask:

    Was this truly a high-speed Internet link, or was this merely a high-speed TCP/IP link? In other words, did the packets truly traverse the publicly accessible Internet (even if in the form of VPN traffic), or were they merely TCP/IP packets on a link that was completely separate from the publicly accessible Internet?

    (Note: I would consider packets that traverse Internet2 to NOT be "On the Internet" as Internet2 is not really accessible to the general public.)

    After all, if I say that I am controlling the antennas on my tower "over the Internet" when in truth all I am doing is controlling them over my local LAN from my shack to the tower controller, that would not be a correct statement. Now, if I am controlling them over an SSH session carried over the Internet, it would be.

    Not all that is TCP/IP is Internet.

    So, which is it: were these packets REALLY going over the Internet in any form, or was this a dedicated link?

  42. its Sealink. and my girl will be on it next week by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    they use sealink a sat provider. My girlfriend is a marine biology grad student and will be on one of noaa ships The Ronald H. Brown (she leaves tonight for the azores). She has commented on the new system is better for everyone as the PI (primary investigators) will be remote so they can have more help on the ship. This seems to work out as the PI seem to just get in everyones way anyways. For regular ship communications everyone gets emails (that get refereshed twice a day 11 and 6 EST I think).

  43. Link Me by fbartho · · Score: 1

    you wanna post a hyperlink? I'm too bored, and yet somehow not bored enough to bother go searching around his site.

    --
    Gravity Sucks
  44. Exploration of the Sea over Space by rAiNsT0rm · · Score: 1

    I'm one of the few people it seems that feels there is more information to be learned from our own vastly uncharted seas than far reaches of space.

    I will never understand why we keep spending billions to remove trash from the ISS when we could be doing so much more here on Earth under the water.

    Is it just not as sexy as space? More discoveries and information have been gleaned from what little oceanic research is done as compared to space. This has always been one of those head scratcher issues with me that I will never understand. Keep looking light-years away for answers when they could be right under your nose the whole time.

    --
    http://teasphere.wordpress.com - A little spot of tea
    1. Re:Exploration of the Sea over Space by Cyno · · Score: 1

      I agree with your statement about the ISS, but the far reaches of space hold many secrets. Its not unlikely we could find another planet with an ocean with as much life as we can find in ours. We've explored most of our planet, documented most forms of life, etc. What we've learned is amazing. But we could learn just as much from 1 other planet, and there could be tens or hundreds or thousands or millions out there, its hard to tell.

      Some answers we may never get from life on this planet, but could you imagine the possibilities of finding several million new forms of life and what impact that could have on our understanding in all fields of science? Its a potential whole new perspective to how exactly life exists. We could find a planet in the premordial stages or a planet several million years older than ours. Exploring the cosmos is also like exploring the timeline, something we can't do very easily here.

    2. Re:Exploration of the Sea over Space by jushto · · Score: 1

      I completely agree, Time and money well spent could give us vital information about cold dark, high pressure liquid environments and the lifeforms that we have found to thrive in them. This information would have to be gathered in the exact same manner anywhere else, but millions of miles would have to be travelled first. And lets face it, even NASA aren't daft enough to send a high pressure submersible ROV to a different planet.

    3. Re:Exploration of the Sea over Space by rAiNsT0rm · · Score: 1

      But you guys are missing the point. Once we have unlocked as much as we can on our own planet in a number of environments we can then better process and understand alien ones.

      So much of our oceans are unknown, I forget the exact percentage but I know it is very small. We go to space and spend most of our time looking at the underside of our own craft... we could have done that here. I've watched a good bit of NASA's coverage of the mission so far and it is terrible. 20-30 minutes of trying to get things lined up to take photographs of the astronauts that are "stunning" and "need to be autographed once they land" In all the coverage I've watched I haven't heard one scientific word spoken. I've heard a lot of laughing and joking and playing. I've heard hours about the tiles. I've seen nothing of value that MY tax dollars funded.

      A single discovery of a new animal or species underwater would at least make my money well spent. I loved Deep Impact, I'm not sure it has any potential to really further anything either, but at least it has potential.

      --
      http://teasphere.wordpress.com - A little spot of tea
  45. Remote presence over internet is cool, but.. by Retired+Replicant · · Score: 1

    isn't this type of thing just going to lead to your lazy boss spending his entire day at the beach, and using a remote-controlled ASIMO-type robot to look over your shoulder in the office?

  46. Re:Exploration of Space by Migraineman · · Score: 1

    If you consider "survival of the species" to be one of the goals of space exploration, then that should help you to understand. No amount of undersea science will help the species survive if we have any one of the "planet killer" scenarios come to bear ... that includes the man-made nuclear ones.

    I'm a firm believer that we need a permanent presence of humans somewhere off this rock. One on the Moon and one on Mars would be a good start. And I'm not talking about some rinky-dink "two people at a time" effort. We need to make a committment to putting a couple hundred folks on the Moon in a sustainable habitat. The "sustainable" part is going to be difficult given current technology.

  47. Re:I just ate some fried chicken. by sexybomber · · Score: 2, Funny

    What the FUCK? Where did that come from?

  48. Re:I just ate some fried chicken. by TheWickedKingJeremy · · Score: 1

    The moderation system is broken on Slashdot... the trolls are coming out in full force -- and are winning. I'm afraid the tides have turned...

    --

    my religion lies somewhere between buddhism and super monkey ball - pamphlet?
  49. What's the whole point about... by AchilleTalon · · Score: 1
    the Internet in this news?

    Any high-speed private network using about any protocol would do the same. And I haven't read any evidence the TCP/IP trafic is transiting on the Internet at all. And in fact, there is no need for it to.

    --
    Achille Talon
    Hop!
  50. Re:I just ate some fried chicken. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sometimes I like to think about ... a girl.. and a girl.. and a girl... and a horse.

  51. The cold war actually benefitted subs more by ianscot · · Score: 2, Interesting
    I'm one of the few people it seems that feels there is more information to be learned from our own vastly uncharted seas than far reaches of space.

    Is that you, Timothy Dalton? Are you still reading from the narrative script for "Deep Blue"?

    Don't fret too much. The military's been lavishing huge money (example: Glomar Explorer) on the ocean for the entirety of the cold war. Now that we've won that war (and are fighting its non-oceanic dregs and ghosts in the form of OBL, Saddam H. and so on) the potential civilian and scientific uses of all that technology are getting tried out in a big way. Robert Ballard's Mediterranean shipwreck dives were done with the little Navy submersibles, for one example among a whole lot of them. The Russian mini subs are available for hire, and so on.

    This is a sort of golden age for shipwrecks and deep sea exploration. It's happening, and there's a lot of cross-benefits between space and the ocean. To wit: this story, or the MBARI cabled submersibles that Bruce Robison uses, juxtaposed with the Mars rovers. Benthic exploratino faces some of the same choices space exploration does. (Do we need to send people down to the Challenger Deep, or remote vehicles?)

    These aren't mutually exclusive options at all.

    --
    "Fundamentalism" isn't about divine morality. It's about human authority.
  52. Re:Roland Piquepaille and Slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Fuck, I wish I made that much money. I'd get a job if it didn't interfere with my college courses. How much money Roland *REALLY* makes is another question, obviously one you don't know (unless you are Roland, which wouldn't surprise me one bit).

    And for the record, you can rent a spartan apartment here for $200 a month in a decent neighborhood.

    Roland is pathetic. I don't care about some random dipshit making money off the internet but the fact is that he WHORES himself out to Slashdot and other websites. He plagarizes (he used to not even do the Source: thing at the bottom, now he does it but it is still often incomplete) and posts images without permission.

    The fact that almost every single article he "writes" is accepted to Slashdot is questionable. I useed to submit articles quite often but most of them got rejected. Why does Roland get ALL of his accepted?

    Do you also remember the TDA scandal perpetuated by Roland? He talked about some French company that was making a "Tactile Digital Assistant" and was selling prototypes at a significant price. Many people paid for their prototype but never received a unit or a refund. The company disappeared. Roland has nothing to say on the matter. Smells a little fishy, no?

    Of course not. People like you support spam and support the kind of fraud he engages in.

  53. Moderating off today by Gorimek · · Score: 1

    It's the same in all stories. Maybe the moderation system has been retuned, so there are much fewer moderators, or sumtin.

  54. Well, I'm on the fence on this one! by cmdrwhitewolf · · Score: 1

    Because on one hand, feats like this allow us to explore places currently unreachable by human beings due to the hostile environment.

    But on the other hand, feats like also gives more ammo to twits who claim we'll never need a manned mission to the moon, mars (or any other places like it) ever again...

    --
    [Now, I'm off to lift my le... Um, visit... at another place.]
  55. pfft.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    shame 1 quote is so misleading... "using high-speed Internet connections to CONTROL robotic vehicles" (emphasis added). the high speed connction doesn't control the ROV at all. its still pilotted by dudes in the control shack on the main vessel. all the net conn does is allow scientists to receive data without waiting and then suggest where the pilots should "fly" the ROV next.

  56. New travel industry? by nizo · · Score: 1

    I wonder how long until there is a "remote travel" industry? Imagine walking through a museum while sitting in your chair thousands of miles away. Or stepping out in traffic in England and getting virtually hit because you looked the wrong way.

  57. Asimov. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Foundation series. I'm sure you've read it.

    Fey diplomat from Anacreon.

    Sounds like his cup o' tea.

  58. Bandwidth? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    er, I'm from Washington too (other side of the state). What bugs me is that they can get decent, high-speed access out in the middle of the Atlantic, yet I'm still stuck with a high-latency, FAP-happy satellite connection.

  59. Re:I just ate some fried chicken. by sexybomber · · Score: 1

    And how!

    Perhaps I can use some of that tide water to wash my brain...

  60. Telepresence - wave of future or not? by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

    The question is more along the lines of:
    1. what if there's a storm surface-side and the Net goes down?
    2. are telepresent scientists as effective and as collaborative as scientists on site?
    3. how much is too much - in other words, do telepresent scientists all trying to get scientists on site to "do them a favor and jiggle that thing there" become a nuisance for scientists who actually travelled the distance, or do they act as an aid by not getting caught up in the "on the spot feeling" and being more observational and more rational in behaviour?
    4. if an expedition is comprised mostly of telepresent scientists, will they log in when the on site scientists are sleeping or eating or will they hog resources at the same time - does it increase utilization or harm it?
    5. does virtual champagne tast the same?

    check out the August 12 issue of Science for a paper from our lab ... now I just need to find another position, since our grant's expiring ...

    --
    -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
  61. More info on Lost City by jlau · · Score: 1
  62. Re:I just ate some fried chicken. by TheWickedKingJeremy · · Score: 1

    You're a Republican, aren't you?

    --

    my religion lies somewhere between buddhism and super monkey ball - pamphlet?
  63. Remote sensing is OK by me if I'm already as close by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    as I can get. This cross country crap is gold plated B.S. It's taken the fucking romance out of exploring. No more island babes creeping into your tent at night...

    Just goes to show that there are some pretty dumbass scientists out there.

  64. what type of jeans? by zioncity · · Score: 1

    Regarding anceint jeans..... I am curious as I myself contain many different jeans,... in my closet... I have Blue Jeans, Stonewash Jeans, Colored and Faded. I am thinking the Faded Jeans are more Ancient like and thus would allow me to access the Stargate on Atlantis in the Pegasus Galaxy... but I better have a ZED pm around and a working SG code to get thru their force shield,... otherwise my atoms will be splatted throughout subspace for the rest of time.

    1. Re:what type of jeans? by AndroidCat · · Score: 1

      Just adjust the cycle and set for warm wash, no biggie. (The Ancients used them for washing machines. Transportation was just a side-effect. They went to Pegasus to look for where the odd socks went.)

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
  65. Re:its Sealink. and my girl will be on it next wee by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They're actually connected constantly. I'm IM'ing with them now (I too have folks on the ship). As the diagram showed, the video/research/data signals are going over satellite to the US where they are then put onto both Internet and Internet2. Internet2 being used for research link and some remote viewing sites for kids, Internet for general data use etc.

  66. Remote Controlled Robots!!! by ubernormous · · Score: 1

    But can they run Linux?

    --
    There's a fine line between genius and insanity. I'm right on it.
  67. Cheaper solution by freaker_TuC · · Score: 1


    A cheaper solution would be just looking to any flies .. if they come OUT of the fridge, its time to throw everything away, not just one thing ...

    Maggots next to this are ...............

    --
    --- I am known for the ones who want to find me on the net. Is that a privacy risk or a privilege? One might wonder..
  68. FYI: Real Atlantis is in Bahamas by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The real Atlantis (Flower of Life book) is somewhere in the shallow water of the Tongue of the ocean http://www.tamug.edu/cavebiology/Bahamas/satellite photos.html

  69. Re:its Sealink. and my girl will be on it next wee by CarpetShark · · Score: 1
    girlfriend is a marine biology grad student and will be on one of noaa ships The Ronald H. Brown (she leaves tonight for the azores).
    Perhaps you would you also like to tell the sex-starved /. geeks what time the guards' rotate shifts at? ;)
  70. Is that a Jaguar Shark? by butterwise · · Score: 1

    Steve Zissou must be quite jealous of this technology...

    --
    If a baby duck is a "duckling," why would anyone want to eat "dumplings?"