Slashdot Mirror


Researchers Create Radio Controlled Humans

utherdoul writes "Say goodbye to remote-controlled cars, say hello to remote-controlled people. Forbes.com (disclosure: I work there) sent a lucky reporter (further disclosure: I am jealous it was not me) to the SIGGRAPH computer graphics conference in Los Angeles, where NTT researchers debuted a device designed to exploit the effects of Galvanic Vestibular Stimulation. As the story explains, when a weak electrical pulse is delivered to the mastoid behind your ear, your body responds by shifting your balance towards it. If the current is strong enough, it not only throws you off balance, but alters the course of your movement. Reading about it really doesn't do it justice -- you have to check out the crazy video of a remotely controlled woman. (Realvideo)"

25 of 262 comments (clear)

  1. Remote-control women? by SlashEdsDoYourJobs · · Score: 5, Funny

    I, for one, hope women will welcome me as their new remote-control-weilding overlord.

  2. The secret of the Nintendo Revolution... by utexaspunk · · Score: 4, Funny

    Yes, here's the secret new interface paradigm promised by the Nintendo Revolution. Beware, though!- firmware v2.0 turnes it into an enslavement device, and the rest of us will have to fight an army of 8-16 year olds! (plus a few older /.ers...)

  3. If you wanted to fight it by Council · · Score: 4, Insightful

    If you want to fight it, all you have to do is go limp.

    It can't force you to walk anywhere, it justs makes you tip in one direction or the other, and your automatic walking reflex keeps you under your center of gravity.

    The video didn't look all that "crazy". It was just a woman walking around with a dazed expression and silly grin. We can only assume she was under control of the remote.

    --
    xkcd.com - a webcomic of mathematics, love, and language.
    1. Re:If you wanted to fight it by RevengeOfPoopJuggler · · Score: 3, Funny

      It can't force you to walk anywhere

      That's why they have a midget follow you around with a sharp pointy stick.

  4. For those who hate Real by ReformedExCon · · Score: 3, Informative
    --
    Jesus saved me from my past. He can save you as well.
  5. I would buy that! by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 5, Funny

    I just watched the video and it is way cool.

    Unlike those dopey walking and dancying robots which I have no interest in, if Sony would just bring to market the "remote controlled goofy japanese cutey" I would buy one, heck I'd even go for two and get twin models -- they could remotely control each other when I get bored with doing it myself.

    --
    When information is power, privacy is freedom.
  6. Honey would you grab me a beer...? by The+Slaughter · · Score: 5, Funny

    "Honey, get me a beer?" "I'm busy." "I said... a beer, woman!" *zap* "Thank you." It works in reverse too.. "Honey, can you finish building the deck?" "I'm busy" "I said.. finish building the deck!" *zap* Yknow it really brings new meaning to couples fighting over the remote control....

  7. Careful what you wish for.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    My powers of prediction tell me that such a position would have an extraordinarily short life expectancy. Particularly, for a slashdot reading marshmellow, that bitches about the editors, while living in his parents basement like a trapdoor spider; pouncing on 2L bottles of Mountain Dew and bags of snackie-cakes that wander too close.

    1. Re:Careful what you wish for.. by poopooboi · · Score: 3, Funny

      like a trapdoor spider; pouncing on 2L bottles of Mountain Dew and bags of snackie-cakes that wander too close.

      Sir, you owe me a coffee and a new keyboard.

  8. AVI direct link by castlec · · Score: 4, Informative
    --
    When I tell an object to delete this, am I killing it or telling it to kill me?
  9. robots by racerxroot · · Score: 5, Funny

    must... watch... video... can't ... control... own.. movements... ahhhhh!! So, we have androids that look and feel alot like humans (earlier /. article), and now we have people that act like robots. this is getting a little too weird for me.

    --
    --- Caffeine is directly responsible for some of my greatest ideas, and some of my most embarrassing moments...
  10. mplayer command line by alanw · · Score: 3, Informative
  11. parasite human by red_forge · · Score: 4, Funny

    err... my Japanese isn't too hot but I think the commentator in the clip refers to the device as the "parasite human".

    Is it just me or is this really sinister?

    They also relate it to robotics research... human robots..

    Also it looks like it should be easy to build into standard audio headphones.... perhaps they already have!.... dun dun DUHHHH!

    1. Re:parasite human by kaellinn18 · · Score: 3, Informative

      Is it just me or is this really sinister? I see no evidence that the guy is left-handed.

      --

      --------
      This isn't the sig you're looking for. Move along.
  12. Re:Real? by Xorkid · · Score: 4, Informative

    If you're running Windows, use Real Alternative, http://www.free-codecs.com/download/Real_Alternati ve.htm works great with Firefox

    --
    www.microsoft.com/athome/sec urity/children/kidtalk.mspx Was This Information Useful?
  13. Re:Real? by Bill+Wong · · Score: 3, Informative

    Or, if for some bizarre reason you actually want to install RealPlayer, the BBC offers a spyware/adware free installer for RealOne.

  14. Nothing new by jjq · · Score: 3, Informative

    See, for instance, http://jp.physoc.org/cgi/content/full/517/3/631 a paper from 1999 with the title "Galvanic vestibular stimulation: new uses for an old tool" Best,

  15. Re:Isn't this what they use to control Dick Cheney by msim · · Score: 5, Funny

    In all honesty i think that is the exception to the rule. In all other cases based in reality that i've seen (dude, manga doesn't count), it is the bush that controls the dick.

    And your lying if you disagree with me.

    --

    Life is like a box of chocolates, you never know when your gonna get food poisoning.
  16. Real questions before installing Real by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    1) Does the player try to take over any other formats than just Real's own?

    2) Does it install an icon to the tasktray?

    3) How many desktop icons does it install?

    4) How many processes does it startup on boot?

    5) Does it integrate the codec into the operating system so that any codec-aware player can use it?

    6) How much data does it send back to Real's servers?

    7) Is the installation process simple and straightforward with a single checkbox to opt-in? Or is it a long series of dialog boxes with hidden checkboxes all over the place?

    8) Does it play videos inline in the browser?

    9) When I close the player (assuming it requires opening the player to watch the media), does it try to stay memory resident?

    10) Is it still Real that makes this? (this is a deal breaker)

    1. Re:Real questions before installing Real by gfody · · Score: 5, Informative

      1) Does the player try to take over any other formats than just Real's own?

      It associates itself with all the "popular" file extensions.

      2) Does it install an icon to the tasktray?

      Like it's 1995, yes.

      3) How many desktop icons does it install?

      just a Upgrade to Real Player Professional shortcut

      4) How many processes does it startup on boot?

      one to reclaim its file associations every 20 seconds. one to keep a tray icon visible at all times. one to check for updates. and one that sends "usage statistics" back to Real. all 4 are added to the startup registry everytime the player is launched.

      5) Does it integrate the codec into the operating system so that any codec-aware player can use it?

      Of course not. That would make it too easy to compare against other codecs.

      6) How much data does it send back to Real's servers?

      Just what your watching, when your watching it and the location of your mouse cursor.

      7) Is the installation process simple and straightforward with a single checkbox to opt-in? Or is it a long series of dialog boxes with hidden checkboxes all over the place?

      It's completely automated with a final messagebox stating that your computer will now be rebooted and a single OK button.

      8) Does it play videos inline in the browser?

      Sometimes.

      9) When I close the player (assuming it requires opening the player to watch the media), does it try to stay memory resident?

      It tries, but then it throws a general protection fault and takes your instance of explorer with it.

      10) Is it still Real that makes this? (this is a deal breaker)

      All development was outsourced to India.. although I hear the new version was outsourced to Russia

      --

      bite my glorious golden ass.
  17. But we see this at the airport all the time... by ScentCone · · Score: 4, Funny

    Just watch people as they come down the concourse and try to pass the Cinnabon store... you get exactly the same glazed-eye, vectored walking behavior, and no headset, other than the ubiquitous iPod. Of course, the Japanese approach is carb-free.

    --
    Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
  18. Re:Great .. by gauchopuro · · Score: 3, Funny

    As can be clearly seen in the video, the woman being controlled was not wearing a tin-foil hat. No one wearing such a hat has ever been controlled in this way.

  19. This is NOT remote control by Elbows · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Despite what the summary would imply, this device doesn't take over your body and completely control your movements. I was at SIGGRAPH and tried it out -- it just throws off your sense of balance, making it hard to walk in a straight line. The effect isn't strong enough to make you fall down, and you could probably learn to compensate for it pretty quickly if you tried.

    The effect is good enough for video games, though -- as part of the demo they put you in front of a driving sim, and use the device to simulate the centripetal force when you go around corners. It was pretty cool.

    For most people, it seemed to be painless, but after a little while my skin started to sting where the electrodes where attached.

    1. Re:This is NOT remote control by ameline · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I was there, and I tried it.

      I have a fair amount of experience throwing off my vestibular canals and ignoring them (pilot, flew aerobatics on the competition circuit for a few years). I tried to walk in a straight line while the device was trying to have me do otherwise. It was *extremely* difficult, but not impossible.

      The feeling of lateral acelleration (where none was actually present) was very convincing.

      I also thought this was one of the cooler things in the emerging technologies section at siggraph.

      --
      Ian Ameline