Slashdot Mirror


Jack Thompson Continues To Talk

Lucerin Red writes "It seems the next game on Jack Thompson's censorship list is Killer 7. The article posted by IGN quotes Jack as saying "There is no question in my mind that a videogame containing 'full-blown sex sequences' cannot be rated anything other than 'AO' rather than 'M.'" The 'full-blown sex sequences' are no more then you could see in a rated R movie." Meanwhile, MowAlon writes "Those of you keeping up with all the latest in the Rockstar Games/Take-Two Interactive/ESRB/EA Games sex scandal may be interested in a radio interview just made available: ChatterBox Video Game Radio just posted an 80-minute audio interview with Jack Thompson, the Miami lawyer out to shut down Rockstar Games. The interview provides a much deeper insight into his views, opinions, and efforts than anything else I've read about him elsewhere on the internet. One highlight includes Jack saying "Will Wright said he wants Electronic Arts to collaborate with the porn industry to allow wholesale modification of their game"."

116 comments

  1. Jack Johnson? by theWrkncacnter · · Score: 1

    Didn't know he was against video game violence, I thought he just liked to play folky pop music.

    --
    -1 (Troll) is antihammer
    1. Re:Jack Johnson? by Jonny_eh · · Score: 1

      You're thinking of John Jackson. -Futurama Reference

  2. Ugh by ElectricBrain · · Score: 1

    This retard's the gaming world's equivalent to hollywood supermarket tabloids. Full of bullshit and lies and blows everything out of proportion.

    Someone slap some sense into this guy already!

    1. Re:Ugh by Trepalium · · Score: 1

      Not for him, just for everyone who has the misfortune of being within earshot of him.

      --
      I used up all my sick days, so I'm calling in dead.
    2. Re:Ugh by Meagermanx · · Score: 1

      In my best Saturday Night Live Chris Mathews voice: "Come on, Jack, say something crazier!"

    3. Re:Ugh by rohlfinator · · Score: 1

      Maybe he'd like this shirt better.

  3. Internet Audio Not Radio by Saeed+al-Sahaf · · Score: 1
    ...may be interested in a radio interview just made available: ChatterBox Video Game Radio just posted an 80-minute audio interview with Jack Thompson...

    Audio posted on the web is not "radio". Did any radio stations actually "air" this? Just wondering...

    --
    "Who are in control, they are not in control of anything - they don't even control themselves!" - Glen Beck
    1. Re:Internet Audio Not Radio by theWrkncacnter · · Score: 1

      Actually, they are a real radio show, they also podcast their on air show as well. They aired a clip of the interview on their show but haven't aired the entire thing, since it has to be edited down first because the interview is longer than their show.

      --
      -1 (Troll) is antihammer
    2. Re:Internet Audio Not Radio by theWrkncacnter · · Score: 5, Informative

      And I'd futher like to point out that if you glanced to the left of the page you would have seen that it says, very clearly: "The ChatterBox Video Game Radio show airs weekly from KFNX 1100AM in Phoenix, Arizona."

      --
      -1 (Troll) is antihammer
    3. Re:Internet Audio Not Radio by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yeah, its a real radio show in Phoenix AZ on AM radio. RTFA.

    4. Re:Internet Audio Not Radio by MowAlon · · Score: 1

      The interview was prerecorded and posted for everyone to download in complete form because we won't be able to play the whole thing on the air. Portions of it WILL be played on 1100 AM KFNX in Phoenix, AZ tomorrow night.

  4. whaaa? by Blaaguuu · · Score: 0

    Whats this about sex scenes? Okay, thats it - I'm buying Killer 7.

    --
    My hand touched her hand. Her hand touched her boob. By the transitive property, I got some boob! Algebra is awesome!
  5. Solution by Soul-Burn666 · · Score: 1

    Current state:
    M - For 17+
    AO - For 18+

    One year doesn't make such a difference. Just combine the two into one 18+ rating. I want to see Walmart not selling any of these considering that a large portion if not most of the games sold today are M.

    And no, it won't make the game companies try to make a game into T instead of the new M/AO because that will require a complete change of the game.

    --
    ^_^
    1. Re:Solution by Trepalium · · Score: 1
      It helps if you compare the MPAA's ratings to the ESRB's:

      ESRB - MPAA
      M - R
      AO - NC-17

      However, unlike the MPAA, the ESRB tells you exactly why it got the rating with a label on the back of the package. The two are clearly modelled on very similar criteria. I've never seen a movie that was violent enough to get an NC-17 rating, likewise for games and the AO rating. Sexual content, on the other hand, tends to easily pushes either over the line.

      --
      I used up all my sick days, so I'm calling in dead.
    2. Re:Solution by Meagermanx · · Score: 1

      Movies tell you what they are rated for, nowadays. Look at a new movie case and look closely under the rating. It's small, but it's there.
      It's very useful when trying to avoid movies without enough nudity or gratuitous violence.

    3. Re:Solution by Babbster · · Score: 1
      Hi. I just thought I'd bring this message from the land of reality, where things are really easy to look up. "Most" of the games sold today are actually rated "E for Everybody" and "T for Teen." A glance at the PS2 products listed at EBgames.com (though this admittedly is not scientific since it's the complete listing of all PS2 products and would include their used selection) reveals a total of 610 items rated M, 2,064 rated E, and 1,369 rated T. Even if you assumed that every M was a unique title while cutting both the E's and T's in half for duplicates, M-rated games STILL wouldn't even constitute a third of the total.

      I recommend you consider applying for a job with Jack Thompson's festival of fun. I'm sure he can use some more folks who just spout off without even trying to find out the facts.

    4. Re:Solution by Babbster · · Score: 1
      PS- I'm a hypocrite since I didn't even run the right listing - what I ran was the complete EBgames catalog. HERE is the breakdown for PS2 games (with the limitations described above):

      E-rated: 469
      E10-rated: 11
      T-rated: 433
      M-rated: 203

      In other words, my point still stands when I'm smart enough to look for the correct information.

    5. Re:Solution by Chemical · · Score: 1

      Here ya go!. A movie that was rated NC-17 for violence rather than sexual content.

    6. Re:Solution by Soul-Burn666 · · Score: 1

      The point is that it is still a large portion of the games.

      Anyways, apparantly where I live, they don't use the ESRB system, but rather the PEGI system. I've been to a game store today, and all the games I've seen with an ESRB rating of M were sold here as "18+", including GTA and Doom3.

      My point still stands that it is stupid that games rated M (i.e 17+) are still "for kids" while AO (i.e 18+) are for adults.

      --
      ^_^
    7. Re:Solution by xero314 · · Score: 1

      I think you may be looking at the wrong numbers. It may be true that most of the games available are not MA but if you look at the sales numbers you will see that (atleas for PS2 and XBOX) MA games out sell others. The top selling 3 PS2 games and the top 4 for xbox are all rated MA. I realize it is only a small slice of the sales but I'm pretty sure it's enought to make big sellers think twice.

    8. Re:Solution by Beyond_GoodandEvil · · Score: 1

      Oh? I thought the tree rape scene would have been what gave it the NC-17

      --
      I laughed at the weak who considered themselves good because they lacked claws.
  6. The boy who cried wolf by alvinrod · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Jack Thompson is nothing more than the boy who cried wolf. While his tactics are effective at first, eventually people will get sick of him blowing the whistle on anything that seems innapropriate to him. When they do, he will be left flapping is jaws and wondering why no one is listening to him.

    If he wanted to go after GTA and get it an AO rating for the violence, I'd probably be fine with that. Considering the amount of violence in the game, it's not too hard for anyone who's ever played it to say it may be innapropriate for a majority of younger teenagers. Consider, for example, the movie Titanic in which you could see a breast that wasn't a really poor and clunky animation rendered on 5 year old hardware. This movie was rated PG-13. Consider several R rated movies with sex scenes that are more pornographic than the comical and largely unerotic scene in San Andreas.

    This is merely the latest Salem witch trial. Eventually the whole thing will blow over. Eventually, Jack Thompson, like Senator McCarthy will go so far over the top that he will lose credibility. I think that this has already happened to an extent when he went after The Sims 2. When he does go, I can honestly say that I won't miss him one bit. Goodbye, moronic fuckwad.

    1. Re:The boy who cried wolf by JNighthawk · · Score: 1

      And Jack Thompson, like McCarthy, will cause a whole lotta trouble before someone finally stands up to him in his witch hunt.

      "Mr. Thompson, have you no decency? At long last, have you no decency?"

      --
      Wheel in the sky keeps on turnin'.
    2. Re:The boy who cried wolf by Meagermanx · · Score: 1

      M is for 17+. It's already been rated so that younger teenagers shouldn't be able to play it.

    3. Re:The boy who cried wolf by ElVaquero · · Score: 1

      Foucault had a number of things to say about how this is "the latest Salem witch trial." The basic gist of it is that deviance is natural and even beneficial for a society. Periodically there will be "crime waves" that get highlighted and sensationalized (this line of theory is also continued by Kai T. Erikson in his book "Wayward Puritans" which talks specifically about those witch trials).

      So yes, this is just something natural that will pass soon enough. All it's doing is helping define the boundaries of the society. In this case the scandal of sex in videogames is defining how America views sexuality. America's becoming more conservative, you can see it in the results and popular media surrounding this event.

    4. Re:The boy who cried wolf by May+Kasahara · · Score: 1
      And Jack Thompson, like McCarthy, will cause a whole lotta trouble before someone finally stands up to him in his witch hunt.

      Hopefully not, but I can completely see that. And going back to the grandparent, perhaps Frederick Wertham is a more apt analogy here.

    5. Re:The boy who cried wolf by SyncNine · · Score: 1

      Nothing personal, many people have said what you said -- I just decided to reply to yours.

      Most of you guys are missing something with the rating system that I'd like to detail here. Having worked in a Game Shop for an extended period of time I am intimately familiar with the 'recommended selling practices'.

      Breakdown of Ratings
      E - Everybody can purchase.
      T - Recommended for Teenagers, Everybody can purchase.
      M - Recommended for Adults, Everybody can purchase with parent's acceptance or permission (at the store).
      AO - Only 18+ can purchase game. Period.

      So it's not that M is 17+ and AO is 18+, it's that M is 17+ but mommy can let you buy it, where AO is 18+ or bust.

      --
      To the darkened skies once more, and ever onward.
    6. Re:The boy who cried wolf by brkello · · Score: 1

      So by "younger teenager"...you mean 17?

      --
      Support a great indie game: http://www.abaddon360.com
    7. Re:The boy who cried wolf by Some_Llama · · Score: 1

      17+ means 17 and older, so he means teenagers under the age of 17... unless you are being witty, in that case i would have to inform you that the portion of my brain the perceives wit has been removed.

    8. Re:The boy who cried wolf by Cornflake917 · · Score: 1

      Eventually, Jack Thompson, like Senator McCarthy will go so far over the top that he will lose credibility.

      One can only hope that his impact won't be as big as McCarthy's. Thompsonism just doesn't have a ring to it like McCarthyism does.

  7. On Station! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    "The ChatterBox Video Game Radio show airs weekly from KFNX 1100AM in Phoenix, Arizona."

    Podcasts are not radio, and ONE station, well, I'm impressed! This must be the real thing, the down-and-dirty truth of all truths!

    1. Re:On Station! by MowAlon · · Score: 2, Informative

      Please e-mail me (Host and Producer) if you know of another station interested in syndicating the program.

    2. Re:On Station! by theWrkncacnter · · Score: 1

      It's actually a pretty good show, I listen to the podcast all the time. And I think you meant "One Station!"

      --
      -1 (Troll) is antihammer
  8. What an idiot. by Trepalium · · Score: 5, Insightful
    If this idiot wants to do something, how about finding a way to prevent these M rated titles from find their way into the hands of children? The M rating clearly says that it's for ages 17 and up, and these idiots continue to complain that 12 and 13 year old children are playing the game. The M rating is supposed to be equivalent to the MPAA's R rating for movies, and by and large, it is (perhaps it's even more generous with that rating than the MPAA is).

    If he wants to lobby for something, perhaps they should make the ESRB ratings enforcable on game resellers or something. Perhaps levy fines on retailers who sell M or AO games to children under 17 (e.g. require ID to purchase these games). It'd probably be an easier fight than Jack's crusade to destroy the ESRB and Rockstar.

    --
    I used up all my sick days, so I'm calling in dead.
    1. Re:What an idiot. by sweetooth · · Score: 1

      Game resellers typically aren't the problem. Parents are. They take thier children down to the stores and say go get that game you wanted. Then they check out without looking at the title. The blame belongs on the parents, end of story. If you don't want your kids to have games with M ratings don't fucking buy them.

    2. Re:What an idiot. by Trepalium · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Typically, yes, this is true, but it would give these crusaders one less thing to complain about. I've heard people like them use children's summer jobs, etc as excuses for why they don't know what their children are playing, so closing off that excuse would probably be a good thing.

      --
      I used up all my sick days, so I'm calling in dead.
    3. Re:What an idiot. by sweetooth · · Score: 1

      Fair enough. Even though really that should still be a parents responsibility. Talk to your kids, ask them what they are doing. They may not always be honest but at least you are making a best effort. I know a lot of parents that don't even bother to do that.

    4. Re:What an idiot. by realityfighter · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I think that a lot of parents are appalled by the idea of their kids playing any kind of video games. They don't even bother to check the contents because, in part, they "know" they won't like it. I know a mom who couldn't discern between Animal Crossing and Resident Evil. To her, it was all just mindless, gory brain rot.

      (When we assured her that Animal Crossing was completely nonviolent, she told us no one would play it because there wasn't any shooting.)

      --
      A strain of paranoid prevention can be worse than the disease, whate'er the intention.
    5. Re:What an idiot. by jackbird · · Score: 1

      That has to be their call, though. Taking a "parents should regulate their kids" stand means that some parents are going to be assholes.

    6. Re:What an idiot. by Some_Llama · · Score: 1

      but then the next step is making it a crime to sell to a person under the age specified by the rating... like it is currently illegal to sell an X-rated movie to a minor right?

  9. How about we just ignore him? by Lewisham · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It seems the only people who print stories about Jack Thompson are gaming sites. How about we just ignore him? He's obviously been terribly ineffective at a mainstream media and lobbying level. It's only when people like Hilary Clinton start shouting that anyone listens.

    He feeds on people hating him. I worry that games journalists are feeding off him too. IGN, Gamespot, Slashdot, Kotaku all need to stop running stories on him, then he'll have nothing left.

    We don't all need a bad guy, people.

  10. That Will Wright quote by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That Will Wright quote is so ridiculous I almost died laughing.

    1. Re:That Will Wright quote by Meagermanx · · Score: 2, Funny

      It's true. You thought Will was some guy who likes to design fun, open-ended games? Wrong. Porn king.

    2. Re:That Will Wright quote by DavidTC · · Score: 1

      I've known that since you could put in escort service next to hotel rooms in SimTower.

      --
      If corporations are people, aren't stockholders guilty of slavery?
    3. Re:That Will Wright quote by MaineCoon · · Score: 1

      Sim Tower wasn't a Will Wright game. It was designed by Yoot Saito and his company OPeNBooK. Maxis published it.

      --
      Hunt your preferred prey at Aliens vs Predator MUD. Join the war at avpmud.com port 4000
    4. Re:That Will Wright quote by DavidTC · · Score: 1
      I actually knew that.

      But you can't build motels in any other old Sim game, so the joke wouldn't work.

      --
      If corporations are people, aren't stockholders guilty of slavery?
    5. Re:That Will Wright quote by Allison+Geode · · Score: 1

      in the upcoming Sims2 for Nintendo DS,instead of building a neighborhood, you build a hotel.

    6. Re:That Will Wright quote by DavidTC · · Score: 1

      Well, that's why I said 'old Sims' game. Even in The Sims, you could build a 'hotel' or even a 'motel', if you didn't mind everyone sharing a last name.

      --
      If corporations are people, aren't stockholders guilty of slavery?
  11. Maybe games should use the movie ratings system? by Eric+Cosky · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I sometimes wonder if the games industry should just use the same ratings system as the movies, possibly migrating some of the ESRB subcategories useful for describing game content.

    Not only are many people apparently under-educated about the meaning of the ESRB ratings - I mean, just look at all the stories about kids playing GTA and parents who let them - but having a separate ratings system makes it impossible to have apples-to-apples comparisons between these two types of media which makes it easy for people to misrepresent the situation. The fact is, these games aren't for kids that's for sure but they aren't any worse than R-rated movies. That they are called "MA" is perhaps the source of the confusion - they may simply not know what that really means. Using the same ratings system seems like it would at least simplify the arguments people seem to want to have about all this.

    --
    -Eric Cosky
  12. DOAX nude hack :) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just wait till he finds the nude hack for Dead or Alive Extreme Volley ball!
    (Anyone getting off on polygon tits is sick anyway...)

  13. A GCN game!? by El_Muerte_TDS · · Score: 1

    Wait.. what did I miss...

    a game with 'full-blown sex sequences' on a Nintendo console?

    Judging from the screenshots I have my doubts. It's artsy style give it less details than a game from 1995.

    Check for yourself: http://media.cube.ign.com/media/495/495539/imgs_1. html

    1. Re:A GCN game!? by glavenoid · · Score: 2, Informative

      the "full blown sex" in Killer 7 is fully clothed... Basically a woman grinding on a man sitting in a wheelchair. The player can only see her from about mid-torso on up. The sounds of her pleasure are certainly audible, as is the "pretend" masturbation in another scene, but there is NO nudity anywhere in this game. Anyone ever play "Fear Effect" for the ps1? Full anime nudity in that game, but no one whined about it back then (1999??) There are much worse things on network tv here in the states.

      --
      I, for one, am looking forward to the inevitable /. beta rollout fallout.
    2. Re:A GCN game!? by Some_Llama · · Score: 1

      Reminds me of the game "13", looks like the "cell shading" type of graphics which IMO look crappy and cartoonish, way to lose immersion there buddy, heh.

  14. Re:Maybe games should use the movie ratings system by dq5+studios · · Score: 2, Interesting

    That would be better but the MPAA has copyrighted (tradmarked?) the movie rating system and has prosecuted people that come too close to copying it.

  15. Everyone needs to listen to this by Syncdata · · Score: 1

    It is a frank, rational discussion of the situation at hand. You can holler at Jack Thompson all you want, but the bottom line is, he's not going to go away. And noone can deny that rockstar is all about the ultra violent games. State of emergency. Grand theft auto. Manhunt for god's sake. I like Grand theft auto 3 too, but lets not kid ourselves about the nature of the tittilation being peddled.

    This is not a gotcha interview, as the interviewer states up front. It is a candid discussion about the situation at hand. Give it a listen.

    --
    "Inattention makes clowns of us all" -Bean
    1. Re:Everyone needs to listen to this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree, although I must say that the comment about Will Wright sounds libelous. He says things like that all the time, but that seems to be more blatant than the other things he's said.

    2. Re:Everyone needs to listen to this by DaveCBio · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Well, it's partly rational. I really think Thompson is truly stretching the point and makign all kinds of specious arguments. Especially when it comes to his discussion of the class action suit.

    3. Re:Everyone needs to listen to this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree, his statement about Wright was pretty off base, but the whole point he was making is that in not protecting their copyright with secondary sites on the internet, they are tacitly condoning it. Thompson does tend to keep his arguements in the realm of the legal

    4. Re:Everyone needs to listen to this by MasterPoof · · Score: 1

      Jack Thompson's rants on game like this are approaching near delusional status; has any consisdered this guy needs a one way ticket to the looney bin ?

      --
      Using GNU/Linux -- Windows-free zone!
    5. Re:Everyone needs to listen to this by Some_Llama · · Score: 2, Interesting

      "but lets not kid ourselves about the nature of the tittilation being peddled."

      I think everyone here understands what these games are about, we read the reviews, we see the screenshots, we play the games... but what Jack Thompson is saying (and his agenda) is that these games are dangerous and are corrupting our youth and turning them into violent killers... the problem with this is it's just not true.

      Video games have enough stigma attached to them already.. do we really need another ass-hat running around spouting lies and making the Video game studios water down or censor these games like they already do for movies, TV, and songs?

  16. Slander by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Couldn't Wil Wright sue Thompson for making up the EA/Porn Industry story and openly slandering him in that interview.

    1. Re:Slander by DavidTC · · Score: 3, Interesting
      I think the best thing for Wil to do is to realize the entire industry is in this together, and state publically that, while he didn't say that, he accepts the premise that external mods to games should be included, and thus he's going to up the rating on The Sims 2 to AO because you make the people walk around naked, and various mods can make it even worse.

      Seriously. The only reason the ratings have any power is because various stores refuse to carry AO games. If the rating system bows to this idiot, the gaming industry needs to respond by only producing AO games. If the top five studios went in together, they coudl do it. If the rating people refuse to 'overrate' games, include hidden content the same way Rockstar did...content you can't possibly get to, but is included in the data files anyway. Scan in hardcode porn and put it in the texture file or whatever.

      And then watching retail stores that refuse to carry AO games either give in or get made irrelevant, thus making the entire rating system irrelevant.

      Congrats, Jack. It's entirely possible you'll be the death of the entire video game rating system if you piss the industry off bad enough. They'll just make everything AO, and then where will you be?

      Which incidentally will result in parents being trained to purchase completely harmless AO games, and thus not batting an eye when 13-year old Jonny wants Hardcore Rape Simulator 2: The Revenge, now with motion feedback.

      But when has anyone who cares 'about the children' actually cared when their actions harm children?

      --
      If corporations are people, aren't stockholders guilty of slavery?
    2. Re:Slander by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Jack is pretty crazy.

      Look at his wikipedia entry

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jack_Thompson_(attorn ey)

      I remember when the 2 Live Crew thing happened. Shouldn't he have gone after Stanley Kubrick because the "Me so Horney" line was sampled from Full Metal Jacket?

      Also I don't know how many of you watch G4TV (there are only like 3 shows that are worth watching on it though. Especially since they got rid of the Screen Savers)

      But Seanbaby acctually challeneged Thompson to an acctual fight on "Attack of the Show"

      I'm picking Seanbaby in the 2nd round by KTFO.

    3. Re:Slander by rohlfinator · · Score: 1

      "If the rating system bows to this idiot, the gaming industry needs to respond by only producing AO games. If the top five studios went in together, they coudl do it. If the rating people refuse to 'overrate' games, include hidden content the same way Rockstar did...content you can't possibly get to, but is included in the data files anyway. Scan in hardcode porn and put it in the texture file or whatever.

      And then watching retail stores that refuse to carry AO games either give in or get made irrelevant, thus making the entire rating system irrelevant."


      That wouldn't work. First of all, there are very few developers that would deliberately stoop to Rockstar's level. Electronic Arts (the top software publisher in America) makes E- and T-rated games almost exclusively; they're not going to all of a sudden start making hardcore porn Harry Potter games because of something this minor. Nintendo (the second biggest software publisher) has published very few M-rated games, and none of them contained the sexual content that would warrant an AO rating. Even the more violence-oriented studios like Bungie, Capcom, and Konami generally shy away from blatantly sexual themes.

      Even if Rockstar could somehow muster a band of sex-loving buddies to make AO-only games with them, people would just stop buying their products and buy the more readily available stuff, i.e. Madden, Halo, and Zelda. Over 90% of current games are rated T or lower, and those games aren't going to magically go away if every M game gets bumped up to AO.

      Secondly, making those games easily available probably won't "train parents to purchase" them. The rating is still "Adults Only", which is very specific in its restrictions. Parents like to think their kids are "mature", but "adult" is almost always associated with pornographic content, which won't go over well with a lot of parents. If small retailers somehow were forced to carry AO games, they'd probably place them in a separate "adult" section like many rental places do, which would be just as deterring to parents as anything.

    4. Re:Slander by DavidTC · · Score: 1
      Your second argument is based on your first. If enough publishers did make enough popular AO games, parents would indeed get very used to having to purchase every single video game their children wanted. So when their kids comes to them and says 'I need a copy of this', they'll say 'Okay, give me the cash'.

      Unlike now, where at least the hope is they will go 'Why are you telling me? You have an allowance, I'm not your toy store.' and the kid has to admit it's a M or AO game and thus he can't purchase it, thus triggering all sorts of alarms in the parent.

      There are all sorts of hoops people get used to leaping through, especially for their kids. Parents often grant more responsiblity to their kid than society does...just ask any parent in a town with a Walmart that does a lot of model making. Walmart cards to make sure you're over 16 if you buy model glue, and those parents just sigh, buy whatever the kid says, and makes sure the kid pays for it.

      The fourth time that a parent has to inspect a game carefully because it's rated 'AO' and finds it's The Sims, they're going to stop inspecting them.

      First of all, there are very few developers that would deliberately stoop to Rockstar's level. Electronic Arts (the top software publisher in America) makes E- and T-rated games almost exclusively; they're not going to all of a sudden start making hardcore porn.

      Didn't you just read the article? Jack first went after the Sims 2 by lying about the fact the nude models have genetalia, and now he's lying about Wil's statements. The Sims, if you missed it, is published by EA.

      If he keeps going after the game industry randomly, he's going to make alot of enemies.

      And, you know, I take it all back. Game publishers don't even have to make AO games.

      All they have to do is refuse to have their games rated. But, to fend off legal attacks, they then say 'This game is not to be sold to people under 18' right on the box.

      Just one popular publisher quitting the ratings game would give all the retailers a very hard choice. Rockstar might have pulled it off by itself, GTA is so popular.

      If you think this isn't possible, I suggest you study the history of the 'Comics Code', which has a scarily identical history. This is exactly why it went away. A few popular comics 'failed' it, and they published anyway, and stores had to make a hard choice.

      --
      If corporations are people, aren't stockholders guilty of slavery?
    5. Re:Slander by Aranth+Brainfire · · Score: 1

      The problem with game companies not agreeing to have their games rated is that our government (God Bless the USA) will quite probably say that a "dangerous situation has developed" and that it is "out of control" and that they obviously have to step in and regulate it themselves, which could very well just lead to the same problem all over again, except without the same ways out.

      --
      "Quoting yourself is stupid." -Me
    6. Re:Slander by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Which incidentally will result in parents being trained to purchase completely harmless AO games, and thus not batting an eye when 13-year old Jonny wants Hardcore Rape Simulator 2: The Revenge , now with motion feedback.
      I hear they aren't as good as you'd think. Reviews:
      Battle Raper
      Battle Raper 2
    7. Re:Slander by DavidTC · · Score: 1

      They can't do a damn thing if the game industry refuses to sell to people under 18.

      --
      If corporations are people, aren't stockholders guilty of slavery?
    8. Re:Slander by DavidTC · · Score: 1

      I think that conclusively proves the idea that there is nothing that you can say in jest about human nature that is stranger than someone, somewhere, actually behaves.

      --
      If corporations are people, aren't stockholders guilty of slavery?
  17. Whoa there, Jack! by dbhankins · · Score: 2, Funny

    Jack Thompson needs to slow down.

    At this rate, I won't have enough money to buy all the games he's going after!

  18. I half think he has a point... by Fred+Or+Alive · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The US AO rating does seem to be completly stupid, no game is ever actually rated it.

    In the UK we have a slightly stange situation where most games have advisory ratings from PEGI (who took over a couple of years ago from ELSPA), but under certain critera they can have the legally enforced BBFC ratings, like DVDs and films.

    But in the UK, the highest ratings (18+ for PEGI, 18 for BBFC) have been used (although the 18+ PEGI rating is rare, as most of them go into the BBFC ratings). Indeed, both Grand Theft Auto (all of them) and Killer 7 are BBFC 18, and they're commonly availible, I can go into my local ASDA (owned by Wal Mart) and buy them. But in the US, it seems that everyone is allergic to the AO rating, even the ESRB. I'd guess it's some sort of weird market forces, where the shops have all decided that AO really means it's banned. And mysteriously the industry run ESRB avoids it like a plauge as well. If I wasn't pissed, I'm sure I could make a better essay on the US puritan streak etc. (it's half like the Daily Mail ran a country!), but instead I'll end up with a horrid steam of conciousness thing. I mean, it's only some dry humping FFS. How does that change the bloody rating...

    I'd also like to note the BBFC said during all this ho-hah over GTA:SA, that even if the "Hot Coffee" had been in the game, it would still be rated the same.

    (I should note that for BBFC, there is the Restricted 18 rating as well (can only be sold in licenced sex shops, used for hardcore porn), but no game has ever qualified for it AFAIK).

    --
    10 PRINT "LOOK AROUND YOU ";
    20 GOTO 10
    1. Re:I half think he has a point... by edbarrett · · Score: 1
      The US AO rating does seem to be completly stupid, no game is ever actually rated it.

      Check it out:

      According to the ESRB website, there are 11,028 games rated between "Early Childhood" and "Mature".

      There are 19 games rated AO, and most of those appear to be pretty out there (anybody have screenshots of Water Closet: The Forbidden Chamber?). It is impressive that GTA:SA is at the top of the list, though.

      I really did try to keep an open mind listening to this interview, but this guy sounds like the type that would have applauded Midnight Cowboy getting its original X rating.

    2. Re:I half think he has a point... by Allison+Geode · · Score: 1

      something awful has two reviews of Water Closet (along with several of the other japanese-imported AO games), Neither of which are safe for work:

      Water Closet Review

      Water Closet Review part 2

      Highly entertaining, even if it is disgusting.

    3. Re:I half think he has a point... by Dachannien · · Score: 1

      I don't know whether to mod your post "Funny", "Informative", or "Jesus H. Christ".

    4. Re:I half think he has a point... by AvitarX · · Score: 1

      Leisure Suit Larry apperently has mature humor.

      That is news to me.

      --
      Wow, sent an e-mail as suggested when clicking on "use classic" banner, and got a fast response that addressed my msg
  19. Simple Solution... by Master+Asia · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The game industry needs an advocacy group, or maybe have a lobbyist or perhaps buy off a senator :P Seriously, you don't see gun manufacturers targeted like you might have in the past. Anyone remember that video of those Columbine kids with a small arsenal shooting trees in the woods? Anyone try to trace back where they got those guns and hold them as responsible as Doom?? These grieving families get counciled by layers that tell them to sue the video game companies, and defense lawyers use it as a defense tactic...not much different than what they tried to do to rock, when some kids commited suicide after playing a Judas Priest record backwards...or with rap when this guy shot a state trooper and blamed it on Tupac b/c he was listening to one of his songs in the car. The game industry has always had its level of releative violence, even before Mortal Kombat. IMO the main problem is that the industry has become more visible and mainstream, and it has no real protection against people like this guy Thompson trying to rage his own little war. On the other side, Rockstar's recent actions don't help matters...the explicitness (or lack of) the content is not the point. Their dishonsty makes an organization like the ESRB look ineffective. Additionally, it doesn't help when you have fools commiting murder over virtual property. You don't give the enemy anything to hold over you, regardless of whether you think its inconsequential. If they can use it, that's a problem.

    --
    "Death and poverty like me so much, they brought friends!" - Vash the Stampede, Trigun
    1. Re:Simple Solution... by Otaku-Man23 · · Score: 3, Informative

      Oh but the video game industry DOES have a lobbyist and advocacy group! A few in fact! Here are some of the people who fight against Jack Thompson and WIN!

      First we have the ESA, the Entertainment Software Association!

      http://www.theesa.com/

      Headed by Doug Lowenstein, a person Jack Thompson REALLY hates, the ESA is video game's no. 1 lobby group and is also the organization that developed the ESRB. While the ESA and ESRB are connected, the ESRB, headed by Patricia Vance, is a separate entity from the rest of the ESA because its sole purpose is to rate games. However, whenever a law, like the one in Illinois, passes, the ESA is the first one there to counter it. AND... they bring back up!

      Back up like the VSDA, Video Software Dealers Association!

      http://www.idealink.org/Resource.phx/vsda/events/h omeent2005/homeentnews.htx

      This group handles video games, DVDs, and much more in terms of video and digital entertainment. From movies, to music, to video games, although with an emphasis on video, the members of this group include retailers and other companies in the entertainment industry who seek to promote and discover new technologies in providing digital entertainment, and also back the stance of movies as well as video games should government legislation possibly impose on them!

      While not as big a lobbyist as they are a partner, the IEMA, Interactive Entertainment Merchants Association, works with the ESRB and ESA in terms of what goes on their member's shelves!

      http://www.iema.org/

      The IEMA has members such as Wal-Mart, Best Buy, and Target, and most members in the IEMA maintain a "Will not stock AO ratings" policy. This is fine since they work with the ESRB and listen to what the ESRB has to say about the games being given to them. This organization works well with the ESRB and ESA, and can come to support the organizations if necessary!

      Second to last, one group that is close to the heart of the games industry, the IGDA, the International Game Developers Association!

      http://www.igda.org/

      This group of game developers is very well spoken in terms of how the creators of games feel about laws that go against their ability to make games. Whereas the ESA could best represent game publishers, the IGDA would represent the game makers themselves. The forum here is a great place for game designers to share ideas and voice opinions on current hot topics. A great community of minds, and should some Miami lawyer try and pass laws against them... well then they start showing teeth!

      And last, one that I don't see much press about, but one that is behind most of my favorite hangouts, the CMP Game Group!

      http://www.cmpgame.com/home.html

      While not a lobbyist or advocacy group by any means, the CMP Game Group finances and provides several methods of information sharing and acheivement recognition in the game industry. They provide the website Gamasutra.com, publish Game Developers magazine, founded the Game Developers Conference, the GDC, the Game Developers Choice Awards, and the Independent Games Festival. If anyone can provide an accurate resource on what makes games the games they are, the CMP game group can provide it or find the person or persons who can!

      So the game industry is not left un-defended. There are plenty of organizations out there to help out people at the ESA and ESRB should they ever come under fire. If you really want to stick it to Jack Thompson, then I suggest becoming a member of some of these organizations and fight with them!

      After all, if not for gamers like us, they wouldn't have the power they do now!

      ~Otaku-Man

  20. You don't know Jack by Kaenneth · · Score: 4, Funny

    Jack Thompson is naked under his clothes.
    Jack Thompson keeps talking about sex.
    Jack Thompson has a poorly defined, but detectible penis.

    ban Jack Thompson!

    1. Re:You don't know Jack by MattMacD · · Score: 1

      Let's just ban humanity and be done with it.

  21. Where's the problem? by Skooky · · Score: 1

    I really don't see where the problem is with sexual content in the video games. The only people that would actually get turned on by it are those fourteen-year-old kids with acne that have no real shot at getting some. We shouldn't take this away from them too.

  22. Not easy to make games rated teen from mature? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And no, it won't make the game companies try to make a game into T instead of the new M/AO because that will require a complete change of the game.

    wait, are you seeing the same games as me? /me looks up random EA shooter

    hey look, the battlefield series of games are all rated teen. Hrm, what does this mean they lack? Blood [read: "intense violence"], and "inapproaite language". These things don't completely change the game, you're still killing people just like you do in all those M rated shooters...

    [spelling nazis here they come!]

  23. Crucial difference by Wilson_6500 · · Score: 1

    Well, when this McCarthy went after what should've been his Army, this Army basically just shrugged and called him a hack, and then this hack went on with his baseless accusations.

    Why didn't EA sue this guy for libel, or slander, or just for being Jack Thompson? I mean, it'd be a _popular_ decision, for once, by putting this shameful and stupid saga to an end--it's not like they'd have to scrape together the lawyer's fees. Would EA and other developers _want_ the hassle of dealing with a stronger, more buraucratic, government-run software ratings board? IANAL, so can I get one to guess at this?

  24. Has this been mentioned? by DaveCBio · · Score: 1

    I had heard that Wil Wright is a Christian. Wouldn't that go against Wil's values if it is that case?

    1. Re:Has this been mentioned? by Stormwatch · · Score: 1

      > I had heard that Wil Wright is
      > a Christian. Wouldn't that go
      > against Wil's values if it is
      > that case?

      Why, are all christians opposed to pr0n? I don't think so! Yet, I heard the absence of violence and sex in the Myst series is because of the Miller bros' religion or something...

  25. Jack Thompson continues to talk? by hunterx11 · · Score: 1

    I don't know about that, but gas is certainly being expelled from one of his orifices.

    --
    English is easier said than done.
  26. After listening to the interview by DaveCBio · · Score: 1

    This guy makes all kinds of logical jumps AND using arguments from intimidation. Anyone that says, "Well, if you deny my rock solid evidence then you clearly are ignoring my absolutely irrefutable point of view.", is trying to push something they know is iffy.

    1. Re:After listening to the interview by DaveCBio · · Score: 1

      Oh and one more thing. He fails to mention that even if the ratings are enforced by law it won't prevent stupid or spineless parents from buying the games for their kids.

  27. Police yourself by redemtionboy · · Score: 1

    My whole problem with this is that the ESRB is just supposed to be there for guidence, and thats what the ratings are for. If he's complaining about children getting a hold of the game, then maybe he should start to lobby for better informent to parents of the ESRB codes and what they mean. The labels on the box clearly do state what is in the game, and they're there for a reason. I am all for keeping innapropriate material out of the hands of children, but why should I and others get heat because some people dont know how to police their children, I dont want to start going to adult video stores in order to pick up the next GTA

  28. Arrrghh! by ho_hocognitive · · Score: 2, Insightful

    When we start holding parents at fault? When do we start punishing the legal guardians? If we advocate fining retailers for selling the product to under-age kids, will we bring charges against the parents? I've worked in retail. In most cases, it's an adult that makes the purchase, irrespective of wether or not you make a point of directing them to the age rating. It seems that you can't make parents aware of the problem.

    1. Re:Arrrghh! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny
      When do we start holding parents at fault? When do we start punishing the legal guardians?

      We don't. It's the government's job to raise children, didn't you know? The only thing that we can fault parents for is not lobbying enough.

  29. He just needs a hug by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Honestly, I think that he just needs a hug ...
    Or to get laid ...
    Or something ...

    I remember reading something in a psyc book at one point in time which talked about displacement. You see a large portion of this world (ie. everyone) has sexual and violent urges that are against the morals, ethics and standards of our society. It is arguable where these urges come from (that is whether they're socialized into us or come from a biological component) but they have existed since (essentially) the dawn of civilization.

    How displacement works is that people have been moralized to think that how they feel about something is wrong and immoral; when they start to get those 'urges' they place the energy the guilt they get causes into the (in their oppinion) opposing cause. Now it is quite common for the strongest supporters of a cause to actually be guilty of high levels of the urges they're fighting against; that is a lot of people who are in PETA are very violent minded people, if you had an opportunity to read many of their letters to the editor you would see what I mean "How can you say that cows were bred by man as food? How would you like it if I came over there, gutted your wife and children, cooked them up and fed them back to you? You BLEEPING BLEEP BLEEPING conservatives make me want to get a BLEEPING BLEEP BLEEPING gun and go to your BLEEPING BLEEP BLEEPING convention and put holes in the BLEEPING BLEEP BLEEPING heads of all of you BLEEPING BLEEP BLEEPING BLEEPERS"

    Not to say that there aren't normal people who actually simply support a cause (in general many rational reasonable people would like some sort of tighter restrictions on the selling and renting of 'Mature' games to children) but that the strongest supporters are usually not these rational reasonable people.

  30. Decent interview by AutopsyReport · · Score: 1
    I would have liked to seen a better interviewer step up to the plate, someone who can argue themselves without backing down but not come off as arrogant. Some of Jack's points were valid and held weight, but I noticed when the interviewer turned on the offensive, Jack's best defense was trying to talk over him so he could get his word in. The interviewer then backed down repeatedly, which made the control of this interview very lopsided in Jack's favour.

    Had there been a stronger interviewer conducting this, I bet Thompson would have hung up halfway through.

    --

    For he today that sheds his blood with me shall be my brother.

    1. Re:Decent interview by MowAlon · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I, the interviewer, agree with you completely. Although I'm extremely pleased with the content of the interview, and the fact that it does something for the community that hasn't been done yet (get out Jack's unslanted/unedited views), I was very unhappy with my interview style. My only defense is that he's a lawyer who's been doing this for a long time and who's put a lot more thought and research into this subject than I ever could. I was prepared, believe it or not, but just stood there and let him talk when I should have taken more control. Like you said, though, he probably would have hung up on me even earlier, and that was the absolute last thing I wanted to happen.

    2. Re:Decent interview by AutopsyReport · · Score: 1
      Don't get me wrong -- it was an excellent job on your part. The content was interesting, well-conducted and it was informing. Even though you backed down on some points (and understandably so, since you don't want him to leave the interview halfway through...), I sided with you on everything you presented.

      Had this been an open discussion not bound by the terms of a public interview, I can bet you would have let the reigns loose and not relent on your points. Despite being less-informed about the research and statistics, your points were more valid than his -- and the fact that the only way to defend against your arguments was to vocally overpower you lends heavily to my belief that this chap is arguing for money, not for the safety of a nation's children.

      You guys did a really good job -- I hope I didn't convey the opposite in my previous post.

      --

      For he today that sheds his blood with me shall be my brother.

    3. Re:Decent interview by mAdMaLuDaWg · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You know, some of Jack's points were really interesting. But you could have countered better? C'mon how many times did you bring up the Ken/Barbie doll defense? You could have easily just told him to switch on the TV at any time of the day and you'll see things which are 100x more serious than videogames. You also let him talk too long when replying to an answer and often times he sidetracked you into another argument. (WTH was he doing talking about McCarthiasm.. I mean c'mon) I wish you had done some more research on the ESRB, Lowenstein, ESA etc. The illinois ban he mentioned is being challenged for a number of valid reasons and I really wish you looked into all this stuff before the interview. It also seemed to me that you bought into some of his arguments regarding interactivity of video games having more of an effect than movies yet there is no solid scientific study to back it up. And you fail to mention that that obviously the vast majority of the video gaming population doesn't go kill people. You know, if this guy actually was working to reform the industry (he really does have some valid points but from his arguments he's obviously just doing this to milk his 30-seconds of fame for all its worth), I would actually be rooting for him. That being said, I'm sure you learned about interviewing through this experience and you will be better prepared when you interview a prominent figure in the future. Mr. Thompson was clearly trying to overwhelm you with his legal innuendos and side tracking arguments.

  31. Re:Maybe games should use the movie ratings system by StonedRat · · Score: 1

    In the UK adult games are rated by the BBFC which are the guys that also rate movies, GTA:SA got an 18 certificate which is why these sex scenes don't matter here. To be honest i doubt they would matter if it was rated 12, after all it's just 2 fully clothed cartoon people pretending to have sex, very erotic :/

    Lets hope the kids don't learn how to type "boobs" into google or we'll see google getting banned.

    --
    "Religion is the most malevolent of all mind viruses." - Arthur C. Clarke.
  32. Oh, the irony... by BakaHoushi · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Does anyone else find it ironic that the radio station he was interviewed for has the same name as a GTA radio station, a series he's always been so avidly fighting? (In GTAIII, the talk radio station was called Chatterbox, hosted by Lazlo, for anyone who didn't know) ...Anyone? Didn't think so.

    1. Re:Oh, the irony... by MowAlon · · Score: 1

      It's actually where we got the name, so it's not so much irony as an inside joke. You're right, though... Most people don't notice.

  33. Re: Construction in "The Sims" by some+guy+I+know · · Score: 1

    I'm still waitng for the one where you can built the crackhouse next to the elementary school.

    --
    Those who sacrifice security to condemn liberty deserve to repeat history or something. - Benjamin Santayana
  34. Re: How to get Hillary Clinton to shut up by some+guy+I+know · · Score: 1
    It's only when people like Hilary Clinton start shouting that anyone listens.
    You can shut her up by pointing out to her that using the "Arnon" mod (removing the letters "a", "r", "n", "o", and "n" from "Hillary Clinton") reveals "embedded adult content" in her name.
    --
    Those who sacrifice security to condemn liberty deserve to repeat history or something. - Benjamin Santayana
  35. I DID use the "Preview" button, dammit! by some+guy+I+know · · Score: 1

    "built" -> "build".
    Sigh.

    --
    Those who sacrifice security to condemn liberty deserve to repeat history or something. - Benjamin Santayana
  36. On Copyright: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why does Jack keep going on and on about EA and video game companies losing their copyright by letting others using the name 'Sims'. Isn't copyright guaranteed? Whether or not you chose to enforce it?

    Doesn't he mean that they risk losing their trademarks? I.e. if another company uses 'Sims' for their product and EA doesn't do anything about it then its a trademark issue.

    And about the whole modding and copyright that he kept rambling about, isn't the enforcement of their copyright up to them? I.e. if they find that someone messing with their copyright skins, textures or map and they don't have a problem with it, then they let it pass?

    And like others who have mentioned, anyone who can go through all the trouble to find and install these mods would already have access to all manner of porn and violence on the internet.

  37. Unfortunately for Mr Johnson... by realityfighter · · Score: 1

    They have the right to do as little to protect their copyright as they want. Also, provided it's legal, they have the right to condone anything they damn well please.

    The phrase "it ain't right" has nothing to do with civil liberties.

    Not bashing you, parent, just adding to the laundry list.

    --
    A strain of paranoid prevention can be worse than the disease, whate'er the intention.
  38. Jack Thompson by Profcrab · · Score: 1

    allegedly masturbates to pictures of Joe McCarthy.

  39. MOD Parent up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Thank you. I was going to say that.

    Perhaps a word on how "Seduction of the Innocent" led to the Comics Code Authority would be good here.

  40. Right... by Kelbear · · Score: 1

    If games taught me to do anything, it's to headshot terrorists.

  41. So the next time you read by Some_Llama · · Score: 1

    An article about Jack Thompson and his overtly anti-gaming beliefs or if you see an article that shows no or opposite correlation between gaming and youth violence, feel free to drop Jack a line...

    His email is:
    jackpeace@comcast.net.

    OR you can write Jack Thompson, 1172 South Dixie Hwy., Suite 111, Coral Gables, FL 33146.

    I think if enough of us write him a real letter everytime he stands before the media and spouts off more lies, he will think differently?

    Who knows maybe someday it WILL happen *not holding breath*

    1. Re:So the next time you read by gameboyhippo · · Score: 1

      Thompson is obviously not anti-gaming. I, a gamer, wrote him a letter explaining that I was a gamer and liked what he was doing. He wrote me a positive reply. Thompson is anti-violent games in the hands of minors.

    2. Re:So the next time you read by tuzzyfoad · · Score: 1

      Then why is he going after the producers of these games instead of the parents who buy them for children or the stores that sell them to children? Why isn't he going after Florence Cohen, the 85-year old woman who bought GTA:SA for her 14-year old grandson, instead of supporting her lawsuit against Rockstar?

    3. Re:So the next time you read by Some_Llama · · Score: 2, Interesting

      "wrote him a letter explaining that I was a gamer and liked what he was doing."

      And he wrote you a positive reply? Amazing...

      Try an experiment, write him as a gamer and tell him you don't like what he is doing.. see what kind of response you get...

      "Thompson is anti-violent games in the hands of minors."

      If there is no correlation between youths who commit acts of violence and Violent video games then why is this good?

      If there is actually a correlaton between reduced violence in minors who play violent video games (which the vioence in youth statistics does show) then wouldn't Jack be doing a bad thing currently?

    4. Re:So the next time you read by gameboyhippo · · Score: 1

      I think you may be right in a way. I think he should go after the retailers who sell these games to minors. Let's do a thinking exercise... If minors got a hold of a porn magazine, who is at fault? Playboy? Maybe not. Most likely the retailer. Then again, if kids get a hold of ciggerettes, who's at fault? Could very well be the tobacco industry as well as the retailers since tobacco is targeted to teenagers. So if games are targeted towards the teenagers, but given an M rating, I think both the retailer and the game company is at fault. GTA is indeed advertised on programs watched by teens. Thus it is intentionally targeted towards teens. Advertising teams aren't stupid.

  42. Re: How to get Hillary Clinton to shut up by Cornflake917 · · Score: 1

    If only we spelled hair as "hiar." Then I could think of a much more logical modification to her name.

  43. Evidence found by government, ignored by opponent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Found this article.

    http://economist.com/printedition/displayStory.cfm ?Story_ID=4246109

    One of the charts from the bureau of justice should prove interesting.

    Even if by attrition, his argument shall fail.

  44. Look at VGCATS.COM by jameskojiro · · Score: 0

    He was e-mailing the artist at VGCATS and was acting like the complete lunatic he is: www.vgcats.com

    --
    Tsukasa: All I really want, is to be left alone...