Slashdot Mirror


Drawing Minorities Into Gaming

UnseenOperation writes "CNN has up entitled an article Drawing Minorities Into Gaming, which discusses the lack of minority heroes in games as well as the lack of minorities in game development. The article states that black and hispanic youths spend more time playing videogames than whites but members of those groups make up less than 7 percent of the industry workforce." From the article: "Roughly 80 percent of video game programmers are white, according to preliminary results of an International Game Developers Association survey. About four percent of designers are Hispanic, and less than three percent are black...A March study by the Kaiser Family Foundation revealed that black youths between 8 and 18 years old played video and computer games roughly 90 minutes a day -- almost 30 minutes more than white youths. And Hispanics play about 10 minutes more per day than whites."

37 of 256 comments (clear)

  1. Double Standard, anyone? by TripMaster+Monkey · · Score: 4, Insightful

    From TFA:
    "CJ," as he's known by his pals, is black -- and to some in the video game industry, that's a problem.


    But in GTA: Vice City, Tommy Vercetti is Italian, and that's OK? As the fiancee of an American of Italian descent, I find that offensive!

    Waitaminit....in RTCW, the Nazis were German! As an American of German descent, I find that offensive!

    Hold on...in IGN's NCAA Football, they have the Notre Dame Fighting Irish??? As an American of Irish descent, I find that offensive!

    (I could keep going, but I trust you all see the absurdity at this point...at least I hope you do...)
    --
    ____

    ~ |rip/\/\aster /\/\onkey

    1. Re:Double Standard, anyone? by Pxtl · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Alternately, one could complain about the shortage of white players in the latest EA NBA licenced title.

      Ah, whatever - the Champ in UT2k4 is black, that's good enough for me. Malcolm pwnz.

    2. Re:Double Standard, anyone? by Mad_Rain · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I find myself agreeing with you about the prevalence of double standards in how we portray members of different ethnic groups, especially when we belong to those ethnic groups. It can be okay for "us" to make fun of ourselves, but as soon as another group does it, be prepared for an argument (at least!)

      Since you mentioned NCAA college athletics, I just want to say that (as a very pale-skinned Native American) I'm glad that the NCAA has stepped up to eliminate names that demean American Indian culture. However, the argument I hear from some of my friends is "Why are you so upset over some name like the Braves? I mean, we have the Fighting Irish and Vikings - surely that's equivalent." It's not the same - Irish Catholics at the University of Notre Dame chose to represent themselves as "The Fighting Irish" and they can control the image they present (to some extent); some white guy decided to call the team "the Redskins", and the image that the team presents conflicts with the true image of the people, and they don't have the control to stop it. The original intentions, honorable or harmful, doesn't matter.

      I see a similar thing in video games and other media (tv, movies, whatever). Characters in video games or movies aren't truly representative of people in real life, and they're often shallowly stereotyped. Unfortunately, I don't think enough of us know about where the creators are coming from to make a decision about whether the game creators are poorly informed/rushed/sloppy, or just racist. And I don't think that TFA is really going to help us figure that out.

      --
      "What do you think?" "I think 'What, do you think?!'"
  2. Hypocrisy by BlackCobra43 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    No one complained that the hero of the first *4* GTAs were white american males, but suddently a black man appears and OH MY GOD RACIAL STEROTYPING RACISM HAVE YOU NO SHAME?

    --
    I never spellcheck and I freely admit it. Save your karma for more worthwhile "lol erorrs" replies
    1. Re:Hypocrisy by Soul-Burn666 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Agreed.
      Also, in games like Postal2, the game devs specifically said the city populace will have all kinds of people, including the minorities so that it will resemble the real world status so no one specifically will be offended.
      So what does the media say? That the game is racist as it allows you to kill members of the minority groups.
      To that the game devs responded that you can kill whoever you want. The game is only "racist" if YOU are racist and kill only specific minorities.

      And you know what? If the game had ONLY caucasians, then it would be racist as it doesn't recognize the minorities as part of the society.

      Same thing in GTA. The villians are from all the groups, same for your allies.

      --
      ^_^
    2. Re:Hypocrisy by Intellectual+Elitist · · Score: 2, Informative

      D'arcy Stern from Urban Chaos was a black female cop in a game whose mechanics were sort of a cross between Grand Theft Auto and Tomb Raider, and it came out well over a year before Grand Theft Auto III. Fun game for its time, too.

    3. Re:Hypocrisy by L7_ · · Score: 2, Funny

      one of the most offensive characters in game history is Barret from Final Fantasy VII. That guy nearly ruined the entire game for me.

      Maybe it was because he was like the worst party member for cloud? its been so long, but when you could have tika, aeris and vincent (my god even Red XII) why would you choose barret?

      he wasn't so offensive either, he just didn't say "I PITY THE FOOL" enough.

  3. Why? by ArsonSmith · · Score: 3, Insightful

    More affirmative action crap. Why not just let people do what they want? Why does it matter if a game is developed by a black, white, man, woman, child etc?

    Why don't we have more white people in basket ball?
    how about Blacks in hockey?

    Do what you're good at and what you like.

    --
    Paying taxes to buy civilization is like paying a hooker to buy love.
    1. Re:Why? by FLAGGR · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Your not getting it. We need diversity, and everyone knows diversity only comes from dudes with different skin colors. We have to make sure every race is 100% equally represented, otherwise we're racist (because caring about things this much sure doesn't make you a racist) In fact, while we're at it, we need more women developing games, 50% infact should have vagina's, otherwise we are being sexist.

    2. Re:Why? by Tim+Browse · · Score: 2, Funny

      50% of women developing games should have vaginas? o_O

  4. Stop by Evro · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Please stop this stupid bullshit. Slashdot is constantly running stories about making games more appealing to women, and now the same drivel is being directed towards "minorities"? We don't need more minority heroes and we don't need more women heroes. We need better games. Games like Zelda don't appeal to white people because Link is white, it's because the game is fun. Mario and Luigi, same deal.

    I wish there was a "politically correct" Slashdot section so I could filter it out.

    --
    rooooar
    1. Re:Stop by Chosen+Reject · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Except that the article already says that more minorites play games than whites, and yet most game programmers are white. So by your logic, if we get even more white programmers, there will be even more white gamers. Stupid logic, always getting in the way! The article refutes itself by giving these two facts;

      1) More minorities play games than whites.

      2) Most game programmers are white.

      Then they go on to say that these facts mean we must have more minority developers. Why? What does it accomplish? So that there are more minorities who will play games? They're already playing more. Someone tell me why! Just let people decide what they want to do rather than starting a new campaign or some other such nonsense.

      --
      Stop Global Warming!
      Just say no to irreversible processes!
    2. Re:Stop by Seumas · · Score: 2, Insightful

      What I don't understand is what the number of hours a particular ethnicity plays videogames per week has to do with what percentage of that ethnicity there should be in gaming.

      The fact is that almost 81.7% of the country is caucasian. So obviously there will statistically be far more caucasians in any one area than there are of any other group.

      So I guess someone needs to figure out how we're going to start relating population to employment in each industry. And what is going to happen when we run out of minorities to balance out the numbers? I mean, if they think we need to have exactly 50% white and 50% black and hispanic, we're going to end up with a massive population of unemployed white people and WAY TOO FEW minorities to fill that other 50%. I mean, if only 12% of the population is of a particular ethnicity, there's no way that 12% can fill 50% of the positions... So... we need some sort of an agreed formula.

      And if there aren't enough people of a certain color who are interested in a certain field, the government should force them to pick up a certain career. And if you don't accept it, you should be put in prison until you change your mind.

    3. Re:Stop by badasscat · · Score: 3, Insightful

      So every profession must maintain the exact equal representation that exists in the overall population according to the US Census?

      Not by mandate, but theoretically that's the way it should be. Unless you're going to make some lame-brained argument about how some races are "predisposed" to certain professions - i.e. whites make good game developers, blacks make good basketball players. That's the only way you can counter-argue the point. (Next you'll start getting into issues of "natural bouyancy.") I don't think you're going there, are you?

      Assuming an employer is an equal opportunity employer (as all large corporations are), then any reasonably large industry (with a large enough sample size) should have a fairly representative workforce.

      If it doesn't, that doesn't necessarily mean it's the industry's fault. But if you start from an assumption that all races are equal, and you then realize that non-whites play games more than whites (in other words, there is an obvious interest in games), then the fact that whites seem to get a disproportionate share of game development jobs indicates a problem somewhere. Maybe it's the educational system. Maybe it's the latent class system. Maybe it's differing regional cultures (though plenty of blacks and hispanics live in southern California, where most game developers are). Maybe it's George Bush or Hillary Clinton or whoever else. But the fact of the matter is, if you start from that assumption - that all races are equal - then there must be something - some link in the chain somewhere - holding these ethnic groups back from getting these jobs.

      It's a problem that's obviously not unique to the game industry, and it's not necessarily the industry's responsibility to fix it either. But in a perfect world, yes, the racial makeup of large industries would reflect the real world. We do not live in a perfect world, so it doesn't always happen. But that doesn't mean you don't set that as a goal and strive for it, as a society.

    4. Re:Stop by Seumas · · Score: 2, Informative

      Not by mandate, but theoretically that's the way it should be. Unless you're going to make some lame-brained argument about how some races are "predisposed" to certain professions

      Here's a lame brained argument for you.

      There are two sides to a penny. I can flip it 100 times but that doesn't mean it is going to turn up heads exactly 50% of the time and tails exactly 50% of the time. It's entirely possible that it could turn up 80/20 or 60/40 or 30/70. Was there any bias in the coin? No, that's just the way things go. Just because there is the potential for an even toss of the coin does not mean the end will always be even.

      People follow the things that interest them. You can't just say "15% of the population is black but only 5% of the gaming industry is - oh noes CONSPIRACIES!".

      And by the previously mentioned logic, if a hispanic kid plays videogames twice as much per week than a white kid, he should get two jobs? Isn't the number of people playing more relevant than the number of hours they're playing? And really, what does it matter how many are playing either? That has NOTHING TO DO WITH THOSE MAKING THE GAMES.

      I watch movies, but I don't want to be an actor. I read books but I don't want to be an author. I listen to music but I don't want to be in a band. I use a computer but I don't want to design hardware. I buy groceries, but I don't want to be a cashier. I eat corn, but I don't want to be a farmer.

      If people are being denied positions because of their ethnicity, that's one thing. But just to throw out some stupid, invented, random "there must be X percentage of Y in Z industry!" for no particular reason is just dumb, sensational and slow-news-day-trolling by the Associated Press.

    5. Re:Stop by elrous0 · · Score: 2, Insightful
      some lame-brained argument about how some races are "predisposed" to certain professions - i.e. whites make good game developers, blacks make good basketball players.

      It's not that they are genetically "predisposed," it's that they are culturally acclimatized. Doesn't really make any damn difference. If you're a black kid growing up in a black neighborhood, everyone around you plays basketball. So you do to. And that's not as true (or nearly as much a focus) in white neighborhoods.

      So it would be pretty goddamn stupid to expect the NBA to employ 80% whites and 13% blacks. And it's just as stupid to expect similar ratios in the video game industry, when whites and Asians are raised to be so much more comfortable with computers and technology.

      You want to change it, head down to your nearest black neighborhood and start up a computer programming class (and start up a basketball camp in your nearest white neighborhood while you're at it). Otherwise, stop crying.

      -Eric

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    6. Re:Stop by Mad_Rain · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Dr. James Naismith (inventor of basketball) was once asked by one of his physiology students at Kansas U. about what he thought about Jesse Owens and how he won a Gold Medal at the 1936 Olympics.

      He said "Look at the the previous two winners. [I beleive Eddie Tolan, the previous winner, was also black, but I could be wrong] It can't be the physique. It must be in the mind. You have people who've been put down, so they have more incentive, because they don't want to be discriminated against."

      Another white student asked "So when will we catch up?" Doc replied, "The day everyone is treated equal. Then everyone has a chance to be first."

      I think the same holds true today, and this still speaks volumes about how people in positions of power treat others. And you're right - none of those effect whether you're a good game developer or not. ;)

      --
      "What do you think?" "I think 'What, do you think?!'"
  5. What about Japanese? by Daemonik · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Many games are developed in Japan and are just translated for the US/Euro markets. Is anyone sweating Sony and Nintendo to hire more non-Japanese programmers?

    Besides, if more minorities are playing games than whites, wouldn't it be reasonable to say that the programmers, although white, appear to be making games that appeal more to minority interests than white kids? How would hiring more minority programmers alter this?

  6. Breakdown by niskel · · Score: 2, Insightful

    80% of game developers may be white but what is a rough breakdown of ethnicity percentages of US citizens? I really have no idea but as a rough guess, the ratio seems fine by me.

    1. Re:Breakdown by TripMaster+Monkey · · Score: 2, Informative


      Here's the numbers from the 2000 U.S. Census:

      White: 75.1%
      Black or African American: 12.3%
      American Indian and Alaska Native: 0.9%
      Asian: 3.6%
      Native Hawaiian and other Pacific Islander: 0.1%
      Two or more races: 2.4%
      Some other race: 5.5%
      Hispanic or Latino: 12.5%

      (NOTE: Percentages do not add up to 100% due to rounding, and because Hispanics may be of any race and are therefore counted under more than one category.)

      --
      ____

      ~ |rip/\/\aster /\/\onkey

  7. 80 percent of programmers are white... by nekoes · · Score: 2, Insightful

    ...4 percent hispanic, less than 3 percent black.
    but what I really want to know is...

    Where da asians at?

    --
    Hey, it's my OPINION that dogs have eight legs and make a sound like a car horn every time they take a piss.
  8. Non-game programmer statistics? by SeekerDarksteel · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I wonder how the ratio of minority programmers in video games compres to the ratio of minority programmers in non-video game jobs. In my class of 40-50 CS/CE students, I know of two blacks and no hispanics. Maybe the problem isn't with the video game industry, but with the entire programming field itself.

    --
    The laws of probability forbid it!
  9. I don't understand... by El_Servas · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Why is it always about stressing the diferences in skin color? or sex of religion or anything else?

    No offense intended, but, man, let it be...
    Let the ones who want to play play... and the ones who don't, don't... Why is that bad?

  10. Who cares?! by Seumas · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Look, if you like games and can afford them, play them. If you don't, don't. Whatever.

    I'm tired of hearing every other day about how transvestite inuite natives transplanted to the lower SE of California, born on Tuesdays are brutally neglected from videogaming.

    I'm a white male in my late 20s and I grew up during the biggest days of gaming and MTV and didn't indulge in either of those things until I was an adult. Guess what? I was okay. My life wasn't destroyed because I couldn't play Megaman on the NES.

    As for the characters in games - who cares? As long as they just feel appropriate, it's fine with me. I didn't play GTA:SA and think "oh this sucks, the main character is a black man. There is no possible way I can identify with him and enjoy playing this game!".

    I'm beginning to think that the real "racism" is harbored by those who implicate the industry in some sort of "unintentional racism".

  11. I see by fixer007 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    "If you've got kids who can sit in front of a game for eight hours, then they have the cognitive thought process to learn how to build the game,"

    That just about sums up the entire article...

    Ummmm no... I've seen some of these kids, trust me they can't do much more than sit in front of a TV for 8 hours.

  12. It Doesn't Matter Anymore by blueZhift · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Given the current globalization of software development, our concerns about the ethnic distribution of game developers simply doesn't matter anymore. Those game development jobs will have fully escaped U.S. borders by the time the kids playing now (many minorities) are old enough to apply for the development or design positions. With that in mind, effort would be better spent trying to figure out how to make better games no matter who develops them. With each generation of new hardware we see what's possible make a great leap forward, but so far I haven't really seen very much new and different in the games themselves. Of course I know very well that this a difficult task at best regardless of what color you are!

    1. Re:It Doesn't Matter Anymore by briankoenig · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Those game development jobs will have fully escaped U.S. borders

      Creating games isn't like coding a database or writing back-end bank account managing software; there are many cultural aspects involved that will prevent the "escape" of these jobs outside of US borders. I don't ever see an Indian company (or any other tech-export country) creating a game that is able to strike American gamers' emotional chords as well as a US or Japanese publisher. Japan has retained their quality game development companies, as had the US, and I don't see those jobs going anywhere soon.

      In spite of that, I do agree with your first statement that ethnic distribution doesn't matter. Any efforts to change the "ethnic distribution" would come off just as every other attempt in other industries has: shallow, insensitive, disruptive, and ultimately ineffective.

  13. Re:Game development, not gaming by Henry+V+.009 · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Its been repeadetly shown that giving children a test with a CULTURAL BIAS affects their score. most IQ tests are written from a middle-class, white, suburban perspective.
    Identify the cultural bias here: Raven's Progresive Matrices example

    IQ is extremely overused. it was designed as a test of the mental capacity of mentally disabled children. (mental age/physical age) it was never to be used as a guage against normally intelligent people to begin with, let alone adults.
    Okay. Explain why IQ correlates so well with income and education level, even when controlling for other factors?
  14. Well...... by Abdadrama · · Score: 5, Informative

    It seems that white people still have problems seeing the racial divide in the U.S. I'm an Artist currently working on my 5th game title, btw I'm also Black. I grew up in inner city philedelphia, I went to black schools and white schools, private and public, I even went to a catholic school. Point: my mother did the best she could to keep me out of inner city public schooling, but when it came time for high school public schooling was all she could do, the money just wasn't there. Once I got out of college (don't ever go to an Art Institute) I landed my first job as an assisitant animator and a lip sync animator. The other animator (a young white male) I worked with once told me that when he was in High school his art teacher gave him is big head start in learning animation. He had a chance to start learning 3d studio vr.1 (dos) and that gave him the boost he needed once he got into college and out into the career path. He had an oppurtunity to learn 3d and animation at a much earlier age than most people. At first I thought this was a odd coincedence, wow he he was lucky, good for him. As the years have gone by I've met more and more White's and asians in the industry that at some point in life had incredible opportunities to learn thier area of expertise at a younger age than I was. These sorts of experiences are difficult to come by in urban schools, the money just isn't there and sports and music are a stronger focal point than art. I feel that blacks need to be educated in game development at a much earlier age, learning about game art once you get into the field is a daunting task that many blacks and non-blacks have trouble adapting to. P.S. As far as GTA is concerned I feel it's a weak argument to make, I'm more concerned with the role of black "caricatures" like T-Bag in the downhill domination game. Who ever designed that character need's to be shot.

    1. Re:Well...... by sumbry · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I too was in a pretty similiar situation. I grew up in the inner-city but my mom enrolled me in a Magnet school in Brentwood, CA (it doesn't get any whiter than that).

      When I came home after school and kicked it with the kids in my neighborhood, the difference between what I'd learned at Brentwood and what they'd learned at Manuel Arts was staggering. We had a computer lab full of Apple ]['s and me and my little brother were programming games in basic and doing logo before we hit our teens. My friends in the neighborhood were going through metal detectors and getting randomly searched for guns and drugs and avoiding getting their asses kicked for being seen with books when they walked home.

      It was and still is completely FUCKED UP. The reason why you don't have more minority developers is not because they're too stupid too do it, it's because they're so far behind in their level of education than it's almost impossible to catch up. How the hell are you going to code a game engine when you're leaving school with an Algebra I math level?

      Know what Affirmitive Action really is? It's a patch. It's a patch designed to fix the fucked up unequal education problem. But instead of Affirmitive Action what really needs to happen is the problem needs to be fixed at its source, everyone should be educated at the same level from the very beginning and they're not.

      With no affirmitive action this will only get worse as families have kids in poor areas that goto poor schools, learn nothing, stay poor, and then have poor kids.

    2. Re:Well...... by KingJoshi · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Education system has a LOT to do with it. But it's a hell of a lot more.

      My sister and I went through the public school system. We're Nepali (inbetween India and China). We went through the ghetto schools, but still were able to get into private colleges. My mom has worked at McDonalds for over 15 years and my father as a parking booth attendant.

      But difference include family, cultural pressures and EXPECTATIONS. My parents were educated. My father was supporting his graduate school at Ohio State through such jobs (immigration issues affecting job possibilities). We didn't grow up with cable television or nice shoes or whatever. We ate rice for dinner every night (both because that's an Asian thing and because it's about the cheapest staple you can get). We had cereal every morning. We had free and once reduced meal plans at school for lunch. We NEVER ate out.

      They saved money for our education. Assume my parents combine for $2K a month. Then 700 a month for rent and utilities (no cable, internet, cell phones or none of that), no more than $300 on food and a few hundred for other expenses. You have 500 a month for a year and that $6K. Do that for 10 years and you can send you kids to college.

      My parents stressed education. They sacrificed so we'd get good education (comparatively to being in Nepal at a non-boarding school). Graduating college was expected!

      But not so for my friends in school. I lived in college campus family housing while they lived in the ghetto. They had to deal with living in a dangerous neighborhood. I never lacked confidence that I would graduate college. Many of my friends parents didn't graduate college and some of their parents never graduated high school. You can understand that education is your ticket out, but it's different from rationally knowing it and actually believing it and living it.

      I have some close friends that are Jews. I've always been fascinated by the perseverance of their race and their successes throughout the world despite their astonishingly miniscule population and being persecuted everywhere. Some left persecution from the Soviet Union, but even there, their grandparents were educated. This long line of educated family members where it's expected. Where the culture stresses it.

      America is going through a problem of undervaluing education. And it's more noticable among the poor, where it's most needed because they have fewer opportunities that can even open up. You can't go all day complaining about how the man is holding you back when after school, you spent 3 hours playing basketball and another 3 playing video games and relaxing the rest of the time and not doing homework. Being poor, having less connections, you'll have to face greater obstacles than someone that does the same thing in the suburbs. But the expectations and pressures by society and yourself to succeed just isn't there.

      Poor people have cable, nice shoes, eat out at fast food restuarants and so forth. They don't know how to pinch money or care to. There isn't expectations for their children to do well in school and parents celebrate with a 3.0 GPA. Parents feel that since they didn't succeed academically and/or financially, they can't put pressure on their own kids to. Kids play a lot of video games, watch movies and dream of being star athletes without real guidance or direction (much less backup plans). People can afford Air Jordans and weed but can't afford time to read a book. Hell, I never read a book growing up unless I had to for a class. And even then, sometimes I just used the cliff notes.

      The education system is pathetic. I know. My high school had the worst percentage of people passing 9th grade proficiency tests in the city. I graduated a year early and my original class started from 550 and dwindled to 100 graduates with the highest GPA being 3.5 (and she didn't take honors courses). We had limited AP classes and for Computer Science 2, we played Encarta and learned ClarisWorks on the Mac instead of programming. But a lot of issues need to be addressed. And if politicians aren't going to fix schools, people still need to find a way to deal with the other social issues.

      --
      In times like these, it is helpful to remember that there have always been times like these. - Paul Harvey
  15. Hrm.. by BigZaphod · · Score: 2, Informative

    "A March study by the Kaiser Family Foundation revealed that black youths between 8 and 18 years old played video and computer games roughly 90 minutes a day -- almost 30 minutes more than white youths. And Hispanics play about 10 minutes more per day than whites."

    So, basically, black and hispanic kids play games more than white kids do, but we need to recruit more minorities into the industry to fix the problem with the games being too stereotyped? Now, I have nothing against anyone who can do the job (regardless where they come from or what they look like), but obviously the blacks and hispanics they speak of are enjoying themselves playing all these games that the people in the current industry have created. It seems if there was some fundamental problem with racial equality here, they'd have a far smaller market and be playing games less - not more. I could be missing something...

  16. Re:Game development, not gaming by jericho4.0 · · Score: 4, Informative
    What if it was true? What if the massive body of evidence that's piling up was correct?

    I personally hate the idea. It assaults the foundation of my liberalism, that everyone is born equal. But I don't think that ignoring the facts for political correctness makes sense. This is part of Harvard Pres Lawrence H. Summers 'controversial" speech.

    "It does appear that on many, many different human attributes-height, weight, propensity for criminality, overall IQ, mathematical ability, scientific ability-there is relatively clear evidence that whatever the difference in means-which can be debated-there is a difference in the standard deviation, and variability of a male and a female population. And that is true with respect to attributes that are and are not plausibly, culturally determined. If one supposes, as I think is reasonable, that if one is talking about physicists at a top twenty-five research university, one is not talking about people who are two standard deviations above the mean. And perhaps it's not even talking about somebody who is three standard deviations above the mean. But it's talking about people who are three and a half, four standard deviations above the mean in the one in 5,000, one in 10,000 class. Even small differences in the standard deviation will translate into very large differences in the available pool substantially out. I did a very crude calculation, which I'm sure was wrong and certainly was unsubtle, twenty different ways. I looked at the Xie and Shauman paper-looked at the book, rather-looked at the evidence on the sex ratios in the top 5% of twelfth graders. If you look at those-they're all over the map, depends on which test, whether it's math, or science, and so forth-but 50% women, one woman for every two men, would be a high-end estimate from their estimates. From that, you can back out a difference in the implied standard deviations that works out to be about 20%. And from that, you can work out the difference out several standard deviations. If you do that calculation-and I have no reason to think that it couldn't be refined in a hundred ways-you get five to one, at the high end. Now, it's pointed out by one of the papers at this conference that these tests are not a very good measure and are not highly predictive with respect to people's ability to do that. And that's absolutely right. But I don't think that resolves the issue at all. Because if my reading of the data is right-it's something people can argue about-that there are some systematic differences in variability in different populations, then whatever the set of attributes are that are precisely defined to correlate with being an aeronautical engineer at MIT or being a chemist at Berkeley, those are probably different in their standard deviations as well. So my sense is that the unfortunate truth-I would far prefer to believe something else, because it would be easier to address what is surely a serious social problem if something else were true-is that the combination of the high-powered job hypothesis and the differing variances probably explains a fair amount of this problem."

    Now, this seems pretty firmly grounded in the questioning openmindedness we expect from our universities. If you disagree, and Summers has pointed out some weak spots for you to start with, I'm sure he's open to disscuss it.

    Of course, the resulting PC backlash had Harvard promising $50,000,000 for anti discrimination measures in two weeks. Something is very wrong here.

    --
    "A language that doesn't affect the way you think about programming, is not worth knowing" - Alan Perlis
  17. Wolfenstein: Enemy Territory by Bnderan · · Score: 2, Informative

    In Wolfenstein: Enemy Territory, The Field Ops class (ammo guy) on the Allies side is black. Though oddly there are no black soldiers on the Axis side.

    1. Re:Wolfenstein: Enemy Territory by Winckle · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I hope you were being sarcastic, i really do. The axis were Nazis, there weren't too keen on black people.

  18. Bob says: "You see Billy... by Spoing · · Score: 2, Interesting
    [pulls pipe from mouth, points to clean cut Billy with the tip]

    ...it is a law of nature that certian races are different.

    In the case of com-pu-ter vid-e-o games, the caucasians -- or whitie as people like we are often called -- are more likely to be aclamated to dark climates. Thus, long hours spent looking at com-pu-ters and playing games indoors is more likely.

    The darker races are used to well-lit climates, thus they are less likely to accell at either the creation or playing of these darkened pastimes and prefer brighter pastimes like Football, Baseball, and Jogging. Basketball, by contrast, being an indoor sport, will always be dominated by caucasians. That's just nature at work!

    Billy, let that be a lesson to you!"

    Billy: "Gee, thanks mister! That explains a whole lot!"

    [We now return you to the current dimension.]

    --
    A firewall can not protect you from yourself. Turn off what you do not need. Do not use the firewall to do your work.
  19. The first paragraph is BS to begin with! by NEOtaku17 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    "Roughly 80 percent of video game programmers are white"

    Wow I had no idea all the hundreds of Japanese games I play all the time were created by mostly WHITE MALES!? Where the hell did they get that number?