Slashdot Mirror


Typewriter As Keyboard Mod

ummit writes "Erik Fitzpatrick did a nice job turning an old Smith-Corona manual typeriter into a functional keyboard, and composed a nice writeup about it, with pictures."

202 comments

  1. finally... by Marscity9 · · Score: 5, Funny

    A good keyboard that clicks with tactile feedback when you use it

    1. Re:finally... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Redundant? That was pretty damn funny, to me.

    2. Re:finally... by Limburgher · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Still I prefer the IBM Model M. Now that sucker's awesome. It's not just the most robust, sturdy keyboard I've ever used, I've also a weapon :)

      --

      You are not the customer.

    3. Re:finally... by mikiN · · Score: 1

      I'm typing this text on one of those! They're pretty awesome, both in ergonomics and reliability. I honestly don't remember how many years I've had mine, but I hope I will be using it for a loooong time to come.

      --
      The Hacker's Guide To The Kernel: Don't panic()!
    4. Re:finally... by bhtooefr · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Try a Model F...

      The Model M is a buckling-spring/membrane hybrid (as in, the BS mechanism hits a membrane). The Model F uses a buckling-spring, but it uses capacitive switching rather than a membrane.

      That said, if I'm not using the keyboard on this lappy, I'm on a Model M. The best 101-key keyboard evar!

    5. Re:finally... by uncoveror · · Score: 3, Funny

      Turning a typewriter into a computer keyboard might even give you an "any" key if you can get an old Typewriters International of Toledo model.

      --
      The Uncoveror: It's the real news.
    6. Re:finally... by Atelbie · · Score: 1

      I think it is a very ok solution for moody writters. Want the sound of the type writter but the spell checker of the word. Either way, pretty sweet.

    7. Re:finally... by Dance_Dance_Karnov · · Score: 2, Informative

      For people who loved the M and northgate keyboards check this out.....

    8. Re:finally... by retinaburn · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I was thinking the same thing. I recently liberated two (one for my brother and one for myself) and pulled out an old ps2-usb converted I got with a keyboard, which let me use it on my new pcs.

      On the downside of the Model M, my brothers old roommates gf had a nervous breakdown because of the late night coding/IRC he used to do causing a significant lack of sleep for her.

      For most /.'rs this won't be a problem ;)

    9. Re:finally... by Dogtanian · · Score: 1

      Still I prefer the IBM Model M.

      AAAAAAAAARGH!!!!!!!

      It's like Chinese water torture. The knowledge that whenever there's a story that mentions computer keyboards *somewhere*, someone will very quickly mention the IBM Model M.

      It seems to have a cult following amongst a particular group of users, and it's inevitable that they'll reply to each other, saying how well-built it was, and how crappy modern membrane keyboards are.

      And the thing is, it probably was well-built, but so what? I've used one, and the action felt unnatural... not even the 'linear' action of some other 1980s mechanical keyboards, but with a weird pressure point 2/3 of the way down, and the requirement to put a large amount of pressure on the keys (*). I'd be willing to bet that the majority of people who hadn't already got used to that style of keyboard would dislike it.

      And some membrane-jobs are pretty good nowadays. Some are awful too, but the same applies to mechanical keyboards.

      To be honest, I think a lot of it's what you're used to.

      --
      "Slashdot - News and Chat Sites Deviant". (Click "homepage" link above for details).
    10. Re:finally... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      clack clack clack What? clack clack Can't hear you clack clack

    11. Re:finally... by jandrese · · Score: 1

      The big complaint I had with them is that they're loud, as in get rude comments from your co-workers loud. You can't use them in dorm rooms because it would limit you to daytime coding only.

      On the other hand, I'm one of those guys who just loves his MS Natural v.1 keyboard, so maybe I shouldn't be commenting about keyboard elitists.

      --

      I read the internet for the articles.
  2. Crackers DO matter! by TheHawke · · Score: 1, Informative

    DUPE!

    http://hardware.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=03/01/ 01/2151236&tid=137

    So sorry, but RESEARCH your work first please?

    --
    First rule of holes; When in one, stop digging.
    1. Re:Crackers DO matter! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So you can't do it yourself? Screw off.

    2. Re:Crackers DO matter! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Doesn't matter how much research he did, lately /. has plenty of dicks like you who will bitch and moan anyway.

      So its been posted before! Get a life!

    3. Re:Crackers DO matter! by NanoGator · · Score: 2, Funny

      "So sorry, but RESEARCH your work first please?"

      Oh brother. Not only was that 'dupe' from 2 years ago, you're the only one who remembers it.

      Man I'm getting tired of the dupe gestapo.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    4. Re:Crackers DO matter! by bedessen · · Score: 1

      I remember it too, but I wasn't planning on making a stink about it.

      (If you think the dupes on /. are bad, try digg.com for a while *yeesh*)

    5. Re:Crackers DO matter! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why don't you go back about 50 years to the mainframe days and just get an old TeleTYpe? /dev/tty anyone?

    6. Re:Crackers DO matter! by lxs · · Score: 1

      Man I'm getting tired of the dupe gestapo.

      Taco? Is that you?

      Don't shoot the messenger. It's not only a dupe, but it's also old news. I'm not getting tired of the dupe gestapo. It shows that even if the paid editors can't be bothered to do the most rudimentary checks on a story, at least the audience is paying attention.

      In my next post I will be defending the position of Grammar Nazis, and debate the following question with my alternate personality: "The GNAA. Evil trolls or persecuted minority?"

    7. Re:Crackers DO matter! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ditto.

    8. Re:Crackers DO matter! by empaler · · Score: 1

      Don't mind the others who are unhappy that you point it out. As mentioned in one of the other replies it's not only a dupe, it's very old.
      News, my foot.

    9. Re:Crackers DO matter! by LordNightwalker · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Nah, I remember it too... Even without the pics I thought there was something familiar about the article...

      Anyway, since the dupe is 2 years old, doesn't that make it "not news anymore"? What the hell is 2 year old "news" doing on slashdot? Your argument stinks.

      --
      Install windows on my workstation? You crazy? Got any idea how much I paid for the damn thing?
    10. Re:Crackers DO matter! by Sneeka2 · · Score: 1

      OMG! You just made me realise that I have been reading /. for way over 4 years now. I remembered the story immediately, but seeing that it's over 2 years old really shocked me. I've changed countries and jobs twice since, but I'm still reading here and I'm actually remembering most of the stuff...

      /. Dupes - The WayBackMachine for your head.

      --
      Bitten Apples are still better than dirty Windows...
    11. Re:Crackers DO matter! by CableModemSniper · · Score: 1

      Me too, but I was planning on making a stink about it, but GP beat me to it.

      --
      Why not fork?
    12. Re:Crackers DO matter! by NanoGator · · Score: 1

      "Taco? Is that you?"

      No, I'm not. Despite popular belief, not everybody thinks your dupe crusade is worth the time it takes to write the phrase "dupe crusade". I'm a regular reader. I'm a regular reader that's far more irritated by the complaints about dupes than I am about the dupes themselves. Why? Mostly because of the high and mighty attitude that comes along with pointing out a dupe. Not only do you dipshits point out the dupe with that "Oh, I'd do your job so much better than you would" arrogant attitude, but you fall over each other racing to point out it's a dupe! The most amusing thing about the whole thing, is that you idiots don't even practice what you preach!! You guys complaining about dupes don't bother reading through the other comments before posting your dupe complaint. This happens EVERY FUCKING TIME. There are far more complaints than dupes!!

      "It shows that even if the paid editors can't be bothered to do the most rudimentary checks on a story, at least the audience is paying attention."

      It shows that you guys are hypocrites, arrogant, and incredibly petty. "Oh look! There's a dupe! It's real easy to find dupes!" "Oh look! There's a dupe! It's real easy to find dupes! But pressing ctrl+F and looking for the word 'dupe' is far beyond my capacity. Really, I just like to bitch!" "DUPE!!! But I'm too lazy to even link to the duped article." "Dupe! Oops. After I hit enter, I just realized that the dude 3 comments up said dupe also. But I won't admit fault!" You guys aren't paying attention, either.

      Spare me the righteousness.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    13. Re:Crackers DO matter! by Mac+Degger · · Score: 1

      Both; the one doesn't preclude the other.

      IOW they're a persecuted minority consisting of evil trolls.

      --
      -- Waht? Tehr's a preveiw buottn?
    14. Re:Crackers DO matter! by lxs · · Score: 1

      Ok. Now breathe deep, slowly step away from the computer and go outside. Now sit on a park bench and look at the passers by, repeating to yourself:"Equally empty, equally to be loved, equally a coming Buddha..."

      And perhaps lay off the caffeine for a while. A silly website like this is not worth getting worked up about.

    15. Re:Crackers DO matter! by NanoGator · · Score: 1

      "And perhaps lay off the caffeine for a while. A silly website like this is not worth getting worked up about."

      Translation: "Oops, he made a point and I don't have a rebuttal."

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    16. Re:Crackers DO matter! by lxs · · Score: 1

      I'm serious. You really need to lighten up. Heart failure is not a pretty way to go.

      You made a lot of points, that I don't feel the need to reply to, partly because they don't apply to me and partly because this thread is pointless. (Just try to find one post by me where I actually pointed out the existence of a dupe. I for one can't be bothered to check if I ever made one. If I did, it will be a very old post.)

      But if you're so concerned about petty point scoring, then yes, I admit it: Your dick is bigger than mine. Happy now?

    17. Re:Crackers DO matter! by NanoGator · · Score: 1

      "You made a lot of points, that I don't feel the need to reply to, partly because they don't apply to me and partly because this thread is pointless."

      It's fun watching some of the debate strategies play out. "Oh I must save face! Maybe I can put him on the defensive by painting a cartoonesque caricature of him!" Heh. Nice try. :) Next time, try not being so transparent.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    18. Re:Crackers DO matter! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      But if you're so concerned about petty point scoring, then yes, I admit it: Your dick is bigger than mine. Happy now?


      I don't know if you are capable of seeing this, but you are guilty of what you're accusing that other twerp of.
  3. surprised by smoondog · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I'm surprised that computer mods/case mods aren't more popular. They hit the /. community regularly, but I'm surprised we don't see them on TV or on other websites more often.

    1. Re:surprised by null+etc. · · Score: 2, Interesting
      How nice! I just bought a 1920's Royal typewriter on ebay for $35, for the explicit purpose of turning it into a PC case. The insides are huge, have glass windows on the side (take that, PC!) and will be a perfect housing for a micro-atx motherboard.

      My final mod will consist of sticking a 19" LCD monitor out of the back, ala Animatrix "Detective Story".

    2. Re:surprised by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree. Are there any good case mod sites? The best one I did was to put a 6 MHz IBM motherboard in a minicomputer case (the size of a small fridge).

    3. Re:surprised by Nasarius · · Score: 3, Insightful
      I'm surprised that computer mods/case mods aren't more popular. They hit the /. community regularly, but I'm surprised we don't see them on TV or on other websites more often.

      Perhaps because most people, myself included, don't really give a crap what their computer looks like. Smaller and quieter is nice. But case windows and, neon lights and a pewter gargoyle on top? It's useless.

      --
      LOAD "SIG",8,1
    4. Re:surprised by nate+nice · · Score: 1

      I agree but I do think it is important a laptop looks good. Obvious functionality must exist of course, but it's something you take with you and are, ahem, seen with. Sounds lame indeed, but it sells more laptops. Stylized desktop cases are not as popular however for the same reason stylized toilet seats are not.

      --
      "If you are a dreamer, a wisher, a liar, A hope-er, a pray-er, a magic bean buyer ..."
    5. Re:surprised by tverbeek · · Score: 1
      I just bought a 1920's Royal typewriter on ebay for $35, for the explicit purpose of turning it into a PC case.

      I bought an old Underwood typewriter a while back for the explicit purpose of using it as... a typewriter. Not quite the same as the machine I used to write A-quality papers and C-minus-quality short stories back in high school (circa l98O), but close enough.

      --
      http://alternatives.rzero.com/
    6. Re:surprised by HardCase · · Score: 1

      Well, the one mentioned in the article has been around since 2003 - at least, that's the last time that /. ran a story about it.

      -h-

    7. Re:surprised by jpkunst · · Score: 1
      l98O

      Heh... lovely subtle touch.

      JP

    8. Re:surprised by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      I was with you up to the pewter gargoyle. I don't know, there's something about the mental image of a gothic-styled full tower that appeals...

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
  4. Nestalgia by Tablizer · · Score: 4, Funny

    *click* *click* *click* "It was a dark and stormy night" *click* *click* *click*

    1. Re:Nestalgia by varmittang · · Score: 1

      all work and no play makes jack a dull boy all work and no play makes jack a dull boy all work and no play makes jack a dull boy all work and no play makes ...

      --
      -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
      12345
      -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
    2. Re:Nestalgia by BillyBlaze · · Score: 3, Funny

      all \n and no
      makes that a long line
      all \n and no <br> makes that a long line
      all \n and no <br> makes that a long line

    3. Re:Nestalgia by Sabalon · · Score: 1

      all work and no play makes homer something something.

      And as the parent said, Snoopy could still use this to abuse editors.

    4. Re:Nestalgia by varmittang · · Score: 2, Funny

      Marge: Go crazy?
      Homer: Don't mind if I do!

      --
      -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
      12345
      -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
    5. Re:Nestalgia by mikiN · · Score: 1

      The quick brown fox jumps over the lazy dog. The quick brown fox jumps over the lazy dog. The quick brown fox jumps over the lazy dog. The quick brown fox jumps over the lazy dog.

      etaoin shrdlu etaoin shrdlu etaoin shrdlu etaoin shrdlu

      --
      The Hacker's Guide To The Kernel: Don't panic()!
    6. Re:Nestalgia by tverbeek · · Score: 2, Interesting
      all work and no play makes jack a dull boy

      Reminds me of an assignment I did for typography class.

      --
      http://alternatives.rzero.com/
    7. Re:Nestalgia by technos · · Score: 1

      THPPFFT!

      --
      .sig: Now legally binding!
    8. Re:Nestalgia by Linker3000 · · Score: 1

      I thought it was 'sultry'?

      (See this if you think I'm totally mad.)

      --
      AT&ROFLMAO
    9. Re:Nestalgia by flazz · · Score: 1

      *click* *click* *click*

      enhance

        *click* *click* *click*

      enhance

  5. doot do do, doot doot do do do dooo by jmb-d · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Anyone else thinking of Brazil and the computers they used?

    --
    In walking, just walk. In sitting, just sit. Above all, don't wobble.
    -- Yun-Men
    1. Re:doot do do, doot doot do do do dooo by DaveCar · · Score: 1

      Brazil, Naked Lunch, but most vividly Max Headroom/Edison Carter come to mind.

    2. Re:doot do do, doot doot do do do dooo by Halfbaked+Plan · · Score: 1

      Back in the mid 80's I ran an old CP/M machine as my main computer. It was a Xerox 820 clone. I used a bare keyboard that had no case (it was what I had that worked) and the monitor was a little 5" monochrome monitor with no case.

      A friend of mine immediately commented when first seeing it that it was the computer from Brazil.

      --
      resigned
    3. Re:doot do do, doot doot do do do dooo by Reaperducer · · Score: 1

      I was thinking about how they did it in Max Headroom.

      I saw Brazil, but don't remember the typewriters. Probably because I didn't really like the movie.

      --
      -- I'm old enough to have lived through six different meanings of the word "hacker."
    4. Re:doot do do, doot doot do do do dooo by silentbozo · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Let me head this off at the pass:
       
        Slashdot article on the ElectriClerk
       
      Enjoy.

    5. Re:doot do do, doot doot do do do dooo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I saw Brazil, but don't remember the typewriters. Probably because I didn't really like the movie.

      What in the fuck is wrong with you?


  6. Wanted: New Manual Typewriter by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

    I think a better idea would be finding a new manual typewriter that isn't outrageously expensive. The electronic typewriters that still sell today for $90 USD isn't worth it. I want a manual typewriter that doesn't need to be tied to the wall so I can come back to it at any time without worrying if the ding-dang-thing overheated to death.

    1. Re:Wanted: New Manual Typewriter by Halfbaked+Plan · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I got a nice IBM Selectric at auction for $3 last month. Unless you're using it where there is no electricity (I got a hand-cranked portable gramaphone today at auction, BTW) you just turn it off when you step away and turn it back on.

      The beauty of writing on a typewriter for those who've never done it, is the indelible immediacy of it. Writing on any kind of a word processor means any power outage can wipe it out, and that you can cursor all the heck over the place and spend a lot more time futzing around. Writing directly to paper means there's a permanent durable revision history. And it's refreshing to be able to just walk up to the typewriter table and type some more on the page. No distractions of a computer/internet terminal, etc.

      --
      resigned
    2. Re:Wanted: New Manual Typewriter by FlameboyC11 · · Score: 1

      But if edit it, you have to rewrite an entire page if you must submit it to somebody.

    3. Re:Wanted: New Manual Typewriter by bhtooefr · · Score: 1

      IBM Selectric: Not new, and it's electric.

      He wants a new, non-electric typewriter.

    4. Re:Wanted: New Manual Typewriter by bhtooefr · · Score: 1

      Like these.

      $91.50 + shipping for a "portable" manual (it's about the size as the "portable" electrics that came in huge carrying cases. It's not one of the "ultraportables" that are about 3" (IIRC) thick, though.)

    5. Re:Wanted: New Manual Typewriter by bhtooefr · · Score: 1

      What the? My tag didn't work... I guess I've been corrupted by hanging around places that use BBcode...

      http://cliftonscommercialconcepts.com/olivetti.htm #Clifton%20Commercial

    6. Re:Wanted: New Manual Typewriter by zakezuke · · Score: 1

      I think a better idea would be finding a new manual typewriter that isn't outrageously expensive.

      Define outrageusly expensive. I remember I was operating on an old underwood with carbonless paper as I didn't have a ribbon till I was pretty much forced to get a Brother typewriter or risk being marked down a full grade. The daisywheel brother cost there and abouts of $300. Here is an image of what I was working with.

      If you want a manual... they are still made somewhat
      https://www.drleonards.com/detail.cfm?IID=21901&ke y=10199001&CFID=264389&CFTOKEN=96837244

      Anyhow... in 1985 you could find this at your local sears in adult and kids models IIRC... price mark was $50ish to $120ish. You'd likely enjoy better luck getting a moderatly modern sub 50 year old Royal or perhaps a Smith Corona or Olivetti Linea 198 which is still made. My geekyness doesn't include model numbers for Royal or Smith Corona... as they were on the back and needed no plugs I never has cause to look. I somehow remember the Royal being one of the easier manuals to work with... layout more contemporary and without odd ball keys missing like the numbers 1 and 0.

      But if you think $90 is over priced... well sorry. Unless you hit the used circuit and get lucky expect to spend $100 to $200 easy on a manual typewriter easily if not $350. These suckers are pretty much reserved for oddballs who travel to remote locations yet still want to get some writing done. The Olivetti likely has to be special ordered from a typewriter shop... and those suckers are getting harder and harder to find as printers are in demand and typewriters just not.

      --
      There is no sanctuary. There is no sanctuary. SHUT UP! There is no shut up. There is no shut up.
    7. Re:Wanted: New Manual Typewriter by Halfbaked+Plan · · Score: 1

      Yes. That's a feature, not a bug. It means there is always a 'durable revision history' in the form of a (literal) paper trail.

      I am convinced that a lot of good ideas are lost to the 'tyranny of the cursor' (the easy ability to wipe out what was previously written.)

      --
      resigned
    8. Re:Wanted: New Manual Typewriter by Halfbaked+Plan · · Score: 1

      Well, since you're holding a triple-level conversation thread with yourself, I'll respond here that I was challanging his requirement that it be a non-electric typewriter.

      I could have also challanged the idea that it has to be new (wtf?? there are GREAT manual typewriters readily available at low cost- why buy some new plastic POS for full price???)

      Carry on with your three level discussion threads with yourself, now...

      --
      resigned
  7. Ooh... man... by gardyloo · · Score: 4, Funny

    Emacs is gonna be a bitch with that thing.

    1. Re:Ooh... man... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah... it'd be much easier with vi.

    2. Re:Ooh... man... by zephc · · Score: 1

      Yeah and don't even bother trying to play Quake/CS/Doom3

      --
      "I would say that 99 per cent of what my father has written about his own life is false." - L. Ron Hubbard Jr.
    3. Re:Ooh... man... by zaguar · · Score: 1

      I use vi, you insensitive clod!

      --
      "Sure there's porn and piracy on the Web but there's probably a downside too."
  8. I suppose a good bonus... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    is that you can configure it to do you a hard copy as a backup.

    It's also made me reminisce about the lovely clatter of golfball printers back in the 80's... *sigh*

    1. Re:I suppose a good bonus... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Insightful?...WTF

  9. Mod Anything... by BrianKStein · · Score: 1

    This just shows that whatever is in existance, you could mod. I think this is also a good idea for the modders that do a GREAT project then just plug in a normal beige keyboard. Take the extra time and make a fancy keyboard, it would look really cool!

    1. Re:Mod Anything... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey, i just wanted to let you know that that was a retarded comment. You added absolutely nothing to the discussion. You should either kill yourself or join the GNAA and put your account to use.

  10. The pictures page by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you just want to browse the pictures look here:

    http://www.multipledigression.com/type/pics/index. htm

  11. The Mandatory Coral Cache by Sanfamite · · Score: 1

    So here you go, the standard fare coral cache of the page for when it implodes.

    http://www.multipledigression.com.nyud.net:8090/ty pe/

    1. Re:The Mandatory Coral Cache by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Atta boy, the link never went down. And if you are going to do such a service, please post anonymously.

  12. What's wrong with CmdrTaco? by arose · · Score: 0, Offtopic
    Last three stories:
    • truncation
    • run.linux
    • years old dupe
    --
    Analogies don't equal equalities, they are merely somewhat analogous.
    1. Re:What's wrong with CmdrTaco? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe something's afoot in the home? Marital trouble, a baby on the way, death in the family, financial problems. Or maybe he's just tired, or doesn't care, or maybe . . . who knows?

    2. Re:What's wrong with CmdrTaco? by uberdave · · Score: 1

      Here's an idea. Instead of complaining about it, write up a new story. Or do something yourself, like shoehorn linux onto a TRS-80 Model 100.

    3. Re:What's wrong with CmdrTaco? by 1u3hr · · Score: 1
      Here's an idea. Instead of complaining about it, write up a new story.

      I don't think there's a shortage of good stories; I've submitted a few, had them rejected, then a while later seen a crappier version posted. The problem is the low quality of the editing, which normally would include 1) selecting a novel story 2) doing a minimal fact/sanity check 3) formatting and spell-checking. It seems however that none of these steps are followed by slashdot "editors".

      Anyway, just punching in the domain "multipledigression.com" inot the slashdot search pulled up the original story. It's not like they have to use their memories.

    4. Re:What's wrong with CmdrTaco? by uberdave · · Score: 1

      You may be right. Perhaps what the Slashdot powers that be need to do is offer editorship privileges to high karma subscribers.

  13. Cool Stuff by HatofPig · · Score: 1

    Interesting idea. I wouldn't have thought that a manual typewriter would have been [i]easier[/i] to use, or less likely to cause RSI, but to each his own. I suppose that there would be a problem with most of the function keys though. I guess that she will have to plug in a second keyboard for all the features.

    --
    Silicon & Charybdis McLuhan Kildall Papert Kay
    1. Re:Cool Stuff by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The reason this works is because RSI is a fake disease ... Why couldn't she claim to have "Yuppie Flu" ? Wrong decade I suppose.

    2. Re:Cool Stuff by bhtooefr · · Score: 1

      If someone's trained to properly use a manual, that's what they'll prefer. They'll hate the key response of an electric, or a Model M.

      Then, us Model M aficionados (wow, I actualy speeled it rite!) like the key response of electrics, and hate the key response of direct membranes and electronics (which usually use direct membrane keyboards).

  14. Re:Dupe by seramar · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Crying dupe's old and played out and just plain getting annoying. When you've seen the article before, you've seen it. Enjoy the new round of comments, or don't, and just move on. I didn't know this was a dupe. I hadn't seen the article before. Don't you dupe-catchers have much better to do with your time than go, "Oh I'm going to show my wealth of /. knowledge by catching a dupe and then wasting my time pulling up the old article and making a post, which I know at least five others will do." It's really tired.

    --
    australian project gutenberg is better than the original.
  15. Wait a minute. . . by liquidMONKEY · · Score: 0

    Isn't using typewriters SCO's strategy? >.>

    1. Re:Wait a minute. . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      what the fuck does that have to do with anything?

  16. mnb Re:doot do do, doot doot do do do dooo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Anyone else thinking of Brazil and the computers they used?


    I was actually thinking more of what my typewriter might start saying to me.

    "What a great sentence. These are words to live by."
    as it asks me to rub some more bug powder on its lips.
  17. How very... by AtariDatacenter · · Score: 2, Interesting

    How very Max Headroom of them. Theora would be proud!

    1. Re:How very... by ScrewMaster · · Score: 1

      Live and direct from ... N- N- N- Network 23.

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
    2. Re:How very... by cpt+kangarooski · · Score: 1

      You kids these days. I remember when Max Headroom was only on Big Time Television.

      --
      -- This and all my posts are in the public domain. I am a lawyer. I am not your lawyer, and this is not legal advice.
    3. Re:How very... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Blank is beautiful!

    4. Re:How very... by 1u3hr · · Score: 1
      I would have said more Brazil.

      In that vein, check out the beautiful ElectriClerk -- a 1923 Underwood typewriter as a keyboard for a Mac.

  18. Not actually useful? by NotQuiteReal · · Score: 3, Informative
    Seems to be missing a lot of keys, like "Ctrl", "Alt", "~", etc.

    Even from the article... "never got the backspace to work"...

    Seems like some old typewriters didn't even have a "1" key - you just used lower case L.

    --
    This issue is a bit more complicated than you think.
    1. Re:Not actually useful? by gardyloo · · Score: 3, Funny

      Yeah, people never actually got any work done with typewriters. They were just playing around for about a hundred years until real keyboards came along.

    2. Re:Not actually useful? by Moridineas · · Score: 1

      Yeah--and tabs--it was an actual tab that you physically moved to set tab stops where the carriage would "fall" stop at.

      I got a typewriter from my grandfather that he had gotten in the 1930's I believe. Incredibly heavy, built like a tank, he used it for literally 60 years, several times a week.

      amazing piece of technology, really.

    3. Re:Not actually useful? by Halfbaked+Plan · · Score: 2, Funny

      At a sucky temp job I had this spring, I took to using the lower case L instead of the 1 key part of the time while entering data. I mean, they had us spending half the day typing the data into Fricking Excel, instead of doing real testing.

      It was a nice diversion to throw a little bit of an 'old school' wrench into that particular works.

      --
      resigned
    4. Re:Not actually useful? by Czo · · Score: 1

      Who said typewriters wern't great in their day? I believe the point was you lose a lot of functionality using the same keysets in a computing environment.

    5. Re:Not actually useful? by gardyloo · · Score: 1

      Who said typewriters wern't great in their day? I believe the point was you lose a lot of functionality using the same keysets in a computing environment. ...wwWHOOOOOOOSHhh...

  19. playing games. by Mastadex · · Score: 0

    I wonder how hard it would be to play first person shooter games on that thing. I hope you dont have to push the paper drum over when you reach the end of the line...that would make it really hard to play unreal...

    --
    A morning without coffee is like something without something else.
  20. Pissed-off mod by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    I thought it was funny, too. Some jackass mod is probably just pissed that he couldn't get a date tonight and decided to be a little jerk by releasing his negative energy as a Redundant. I would have gotten a date for tonight, but the wife would not have appreciated it. She's so closed-minded about those sorts of things. :)

    Oh, no! Here comes another pissed off mod who coudln't get a date and is ready to hit me with an "off-topic" and "flamebait"! I cringe!

  21. Oh boy by Trip+Ericson · · Score: 2, Funny

    I can almost picture one of my relatives using a computer with a type-writer keyboard. I'll get a call about the typewriter not working. I'll show up to find the monitor covered in White-Out. And smashed on the floor after they pushed it left and off the desk at the end of the line.

    1. Re:Oh boy by mikiN · · Score: 1

      That would be "pushed it right and off the desk".
      ROTFL none the less!

      --
      The Hacker's Guide To The Kernel: Don't panic()!
    2. Re:Oh boy by number11 · · Score: 1

      I can almost picture one of my relatives using a computer with a type-writer keyboard.

      One of my first computer programs was one to turn my computer (with a daisywheel printer) into a typewriter. It did make filling out paper forms easier. No editing capability, though.

    3. Re:Oh boy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "pushed it left" is correct. The keywords are "end of line". Have you used a typewriter at all?

      Funny, though, is correct.

    4. Re:Oh boy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have, for years and years.
      Maybe you are of the generation of the "gee whiz.zzzzz bang!" type of electric typewriters where the daisywheel or type ball is moved left, but I'm talking about typewriters where you actually had to push a handle to the right to move the entire carriage holding the paper to the right, simultaneously advancing the paper by whatever amount you had selected with a lever.

  22. No review? by Solder+Fumes · · Score: 2, Insightful

    There's no review from the wife. Funny, with millions upon millions of people using computers, you never hear the complaint about "flying through air and hitting wall" effect of computer keyboards. I've used manual typewriters, and my fingers were MUCH more tired after only an hour of typing. On a computer I can type for a full day and feel no fatigue.

    I suspect that his wife was merely using this as an excuse for computer incompetence. I've heard worse excuses from the luddites; evil rays coming from the LCD monitor, an anthropomorphic hatred emanating from the computer, and faking pressing the power button so they can pretend the computer's dead. I doubt this guy's wife actually liked this present, or will used it.

    1. Re:No review? by gnarlin · · Score: 1

      I think this man's wife really knows her husband well. In fact I believe that her "hint" was her cristmas present to him,
      knowing his geeky side and how much he enjoyed using his skills to help his loved ones. Of course this is all supposition on my part.

      --
      A bad analogy is like a leaky screwdriver.
    2. Re:No review? by PlacidPundit · · Score: 1
      There's no review from the wife. Funny, with millions upon millions of people using computers, you never hear the complaint about "flying through air and hitting wall" effect of computer keyboards.

      I do, and I've heard quite a few others complain as well. Modern keyboards are poor.

      I've used manual typewriters, and my fingers were MUCH more tired after only an hour of typing.

      That's because you weren't doing it properly. I'm a pianist and I really miss a good solid key to sink into. Unless you use your arms, hands, and fingers in precisely the correct way, however, you will find such an action unpleasant.

    3. Re:No review? by Teun · · Score: 1

      It is actually well known that repetetive actions by themself are hardly the cause for the physical problems mentioned.BR> It is the repetitivenes combined with not using your muscles that often causes the syndrome.
      An other problem with the present keyboards is the extremely small movement you need to make to get a character on the screen, this is why some older keyboards with a (much) longer travel were hardly ever causing the dreaded pain.

      --
      "The likes of Facebook and WhatsApp are free to those whose privacy is of zero value."
  23. Some people will do anything by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    .. to avoid having a Windows key.

    1. Re:Some people will do anything by yesheh · · Score: 1

      get an apple keyboard...only $40 or so... Of course there's people like me who hook up a standard win keyboard to a mac because it's cheaper...

  24. It's been done, all of it. by jdp816 · · Score: 0

    The Brazil-esqe, Cthulhu-esqe, retro mod: ElectriClerk Heck, there's even a mod where a whole computer got put into the case of the typewriter. Maybe Google would turn up more.

    1. Re:It's been done, all of it. by jdp816 · · Score: 0

      There it is, Underwood no. 5

  25. Another Typewriter PC by hedgehog2097 · · Score: 2, Informative

    Here's some design hints:

    http://www.mini-itx.com/projects/underwood/

    The cool thing about Erik Fitzpatrick's one is it still functions as a typewriter.

    1. Re:Another Typewriter PC by Kinetix303 · · Score: 0

      No, it doesn't. The keyboard in this project is just a normal cheapo PC keyboard with the underwood keys glued to it. I suppose you could still use word.

    2. Re:Another Typewriter PC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes it does. Read the top of the page dumbass. hedgehog wasn't complementing the mini-itx one.

  26. NOOOOOOO!!!! by absurdist · · Score: 1

    I want to see how to mod a REAL mechanical typewriter. With open CRT. as in Brazil(http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0088846/)

  27. The reverse! by Announcer · · Score: 1

    Way back when, when letter-quality printers were quite pricey, I had a thought of rigging up a bunch of solenoids to an electric typewriter to make a crude computer printer. It never got off the drawing board.

    Thank the Lord.

    --
    Willie...
    1. Re:The reverse! by localroger · · Score: 1

      In the 1970's I had a book with explicit directions for converting an IBM Selectric into a printer using a handful of solenoids. Unfortunately, at the time a Selectric was cheaper than a letter-quality printer but stil a lot more expensive than I could afford.

      --
      Brackets contain world's first nanosig, highly magnified:[.]
    2. Re:The reverse! by bhtooefr · · Score: 1

      I do believe that people even sold kits to do that to an IBM Selectric. In fact, I think IBM themselves may have published info on how to connect one to a mainframe for both input and output...

      (I can't confirm that, though. However, people HAVE done it for I and O on the Selectric.)

    3. Re:The reverse! by Gordonjcp · · Score: 1
      I actually did that. Only for the "A" key though. Then I realised that not only was I never going to be able to afford enough solenoids (I was about 10 at the time), but the power consumption and noise was incredible. Had a lot of fun typing out "AAAAAAAAAaaaaaaaAAAAAAAAAaaaaaaa" depending on the state of the shift key though.


      Eventually I realised I was just quicker typing stuff as I read it off the screen, if I wanted hardcopy.

    4. Re:The reverse! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My college roommate actually designed and built one of these for his homebrew system back in 1975. It worked as fast as the Selectric could operate, and lasted long enough that he could later afford a "real" printer when they stopped costing $2000.

  28. Re:Read out loud. by bhirsch · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Thanks a lot asshole. I was sitting outside of a Starbucks with my laptop and WiFi connection across from a KFC when I followed your instructions and now I have a fried chicken wing lodged in my rectum.

  29. PC in a typewriter by StonedRat · · Score: 2, Informative

    I think this mini-itx PC in a typewriter is much cooler.

    http://www.mini-itx.com/projects/underwood/

    --
    "Religion is the most malevolent of all mind viruses." - Arthur C. Clarke.
  30. Re:Dupe by Limburgher · · Score: 1
    Hear, hear.

    I sometimes (gasp) am away from /. for days at a time and don't have time to sift through the Older Stuff section. This is true for many, and the second set of comments is frequently as good as the first, if not better. Get over yourselves.

    --

    You are not the customer.

  31. You're not done yet. by neo · · Score: 2, Funny

    There's still space in that thing for a whole computer.

  32. I've always wanted the opposite by G4from128k · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I've always wanted to make a computer into a typewriter. By sending characters and control commands to an old dot matrix printer, one should be able to make a passable typewriter application that outputs dot matrix characters in real time. It would use carriage control logic such as that used in the old DecWriter dumb terminal to scoot the print head away from the active printing area to show the user what's being typed and then reposition the print head when they start typing again.

    Sometimes you just need to type words into some odious government form and a hacked typewriter made from some leftover computer junk would be just the thing. I've got an old Mac LC II and an Imagewriter that would be just perfect for this hack, but any old computer and dot matrix printer should work. With a custom application that autoruns during boot, the thing wouldn't even need a monitor.

    --
    Two wrongs don't make a right, but three lefts do.
    1. Re:I've always wanted the opposite by localroger · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The Coleco Adam did this out of the box. Back when most computers booted into BASIC the Adam booted into this kind of typewriter mode, and was one keystroke away from a pretty good little word processor (for its time). To get BASIC or any other program you loaded it from a high-speed random access tape (what the Adam had instead of disk drives).

      --
      Brackets contain world's first nanosig, highly magnified:[.]
    2. Re:I've always wanted the opposite by tverbeek · · Score: 1

      The DECwriter was a wondrous piece of machinery. A bit of nuisance for entering new programs (compared to the Teleray terminal next to it in our "computer lab", but a lot more convenient than submitting a print job when you wanted a program listing to take home and debug.

      --
      http://alternatives.rzero.com/
    3. Re:I've always wanted the opposite by superpenguin · · Score: 1

      Not too terribly long ago, when I was totally dependent on friends and family handouts to aquire computing equipment, I had a 386 and a daisywheel printer. I thought that printer was the coolest thing, as it wasn't too far removed from the electric typewriters that had fascinated me and that i took apart. Also, it sounded like a small war when it printed. So of course I fired up BASIC and wrote a little typewriter program. All it did was copy keyboard input to LPT1. I still preferred my second-hand Selectric typewriter, though, mostly because it was easier to correct typos.

    4. Re:I've always wanted the opposite by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      What would be really bitchin is if you used the typewriter mod from TFA, and hooked that shit up to your pc and dot matrix printer!

      Then, you could have the look and feel of a typewriter, but it would work (well, almost) like a real typewriter! Which would solve the problem, of ... well aw hell.

    5. Re:I've always wanted the opposite by DK · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I wrote a program 14 years ago that does exactly what you describe. Back then, I was filling out college applications, and I didn't have a typewriter, but I had a dot-matrix printer hooked up to my 286. The program was written in GW-BASIC, which had a command (lprint ??) that sent characters to a parallel port. The program was able to type either a single character or a full line at a time. My programming skills were pretty poor back then, which goes to show how easy this was to do.

      It's too bad that modern printers aren't quite so easy to hack.

    6. Re:I've always wanted the opposite by zakezuke · · Score: 1

      The Coleco Adam did this out of the box. Back when most computers booted into BASIC the Adam booted into this kind of typewriter mode, and was one keystroke away from a pretty good little word processor (for its time). To get BASIC or any other program you loaded it from a high-speed random access tape (what the Adam had instead of disk drives).

      Tape drives were not unique during that time period. Just most home computers employed the use of a portable cassette recorder which you manual cued where the Adam had a true blue tape drive with the ability to seek. Disk drives were an option, cartridges were commonly sold, but every adam had at least one tape drive onboard. The speed of the drive was 1200bps IIRC... the same as the TI/99/4a.

      The Adam was unique in the fact that it was geard tward word processing. Marketing computers was very hard in the early 1980s... there were three basic nitches... Games, education, and word processing. Unfortunatly the most successful home computers were the ones that actually popular game titles.... Atari and Commodore.

      The painfully annoying thing about the Adam was the fact that the printer acted as a power supply to the main unit. Cut down on the wires but really put a pain in finding a place to setup the sucker. While the daisy wheel printer made a pretty spiffy typewriter... it was very painful to hook up a dot matrix to it... even if you were lucky enough to find a power supply to replace your printer.

      But still all and all a decent product that had many perks over the other guys... but people tended to shy away from it as they didn't want to shell out close to $1000 for something that came with everything.... from my obervsion at retail stores the parents were buying ataries and commodores for their kids.

      --
      There is no sanctuary. There is no sanctuary. SHUT UP! There is no shut up. There is no shut up.
    7. Re:I've always wanted the opposite by jdp816 · · Score: 0

      I remember doing something similar on my Amiga back in the day. IIRC the CLI/Shell command was something like 'echo PAR:' which read output from the console and sent it straight to the printer.

    8. Re:I've always wanted the opposite by The+Cisco+Kid · · Score: 1

      For filling out forms, I've always made several copies of the form, printed an alignment pattern on one, and then just use that to determine the vertical and horizontal positions to put text into the blanks on the form.

    9. Re:I've always wanted the opposite by cra · · Score: 1

      10-12 years ago, in the "good ol' DOS times" you could do this by typing "Copy con >lpt1" (or something like that) on the command prompt, and any keystroke would be redirected to the printer. Worked just fine with my Star LC-20. Of course backspace and some other keys functioned rather poorly, but as long as you typed text it worked fine.

      --
      This message has been ROT-13 encrypted twice for higher security.
  33. What about keys not on a typewriter by MSDos-486 · · Score: 0, Redundant

    What about special keys like Alt ctrl, etc. and dont most type writers leave the 1 key out because it can be substitued with a l

  34. IBM Selectric by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    I ran into one of these a few years ago. I think had better feedback than modern keyboards. Wikipedia's got a write up it. Looks like some models had an RS-232 port for use as a terminal.

  35. Windows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    How do you do Ctrl-Alt-Del on this keyboard?

  36. This always reminds me of... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Brazil... What ahoot of a movie!

  37. Re:Dupe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Parent poster is a dupe.

  38. Fripped produce! n/t by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A bunch of stuff to make the slashdot time bassed filter thing happy. Tadah!

  39. heads up, please? by Graymalkn · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Why do you hate me so? This is going to kill my alotted bandwidth. Could I get a heads up before getting slashdotted?

    --

    *******
    "What good is science if no one gets hurt?!" - Professor Chromedome

    1. Re:heads up, please? by Matilda+the+Hun · · Score: 1

      Interesting. I guess the editors are getting more incompetent-- not only are they posting dupes, but they're not even bothering to give a heads-up to the owner of the site before an article is posted, which is what they say they do. You wrote a complaint email, I hope.

      --
      Tluin natha Linux xxizzuss uriu olt bwael mon'tun.
    2. Re:heads up, please? by Leebert · · Score: 1

      I guess the editors are getting more incompetent-- not only are they posting dupes, but they're not even bothering to give a heads-up to the owner of the site before an article is posted, which is what they say they do.

      Huh? Though I'm no defender of the slashdot "editorial" staff, they explicitely do NOT warn site owners prior to a story, see: http://slashdot.org/faq/suggestions.shtml#su900

    3. Re:heads up, please? by Matilda+the+Hun · · Score: 1

      Really? I could have sworn that I read somewhere that people were warned (not asked, mind you, just sent an email saying "Hey, guess what?"). Especially since it seems a lot of sites, when Slashdot links to them, already have a thing along the lines of "Hello Slashdot" or "I had to warn my server about the jump in traffic, and now I have to pay them another hundred bucks a month- thanks for nothing, you bums!" In any case, saying something early would be the polite thing to do- not everyone can handle the server load...

      --
      Tluin natha Linux xxizzuss uriu olt bwael mon'tun.
    4. Re:heads up, please? by arose · · Score: 1

      I believe the only warning you can expect is from a nice subscriber who saw the stroy early.

      --
      Analogies don't equal equalities, they are merely somewhat analogous.
    5. Re:heads up, please? by freaker_TuC · · Score: 1

      These suggestions are very much outdated. We are living years later now when this was written, with many more readers, more articles and (more?) duplicates.

      Slashdot is a filtered newssite which has very good (new) topics on freedom, gadgets, research and technology. I am reading it (together with kuroshin) because it's keeping me informed in trends which are also coming over to Europe. The Patriot Act and DMCA (EUCD) laws are scaring me as hell. It's also a relaxed forum to read often with funny remarks; I guess each of you has a reason why you are reading Slashdot.

      Slashdot is not using these newest technologies; why not use Corel cache as proxy for the newest articles with a selection for the users with a destructive heart. Admit, you see a new story in your (never working) rss feed and you want to see the site. What's going to be most effective? You click and see it through the cache automatically or type in that nasty url yourself? Welcome to the world of Apache and server redirections.

      It's about a community, use the tools what they are made for, not? It's still a possibility to put the option to off for some users. Some sites/providers have smaller bandwidth than others; what are you going to do, knock 'm out with an article?

      [conspiracy on]
      It's a perfect example how cyber warfare could go not? just knocking out with a lot of bots, like spam, knock out a few sites and information-highway-blackout ...
      [conspiracy off]

      --
      --- I am known for the ones who want to find me on the net. Is that a privacy risk or a privilege? One might wonder..
    6. Re:heads up, please? by 1u3hr · · Score: 1
      Why do you hate me so? This is going to kill my alotted bandwidth.

      The images aren't being served now. Doesn't matter, as I remember this from the last time Slashdot ran it a couple of years ago. Anyway, how about an update -- does it still work?

  40. not that great by Graymalkn · · Score: 5, Informative

    My wife liked it, but it isn't in use at the moment because of a few drawbacks: no 1 key, no backspace, and no Escape. I'm working on a second version that should fix these things. In fact, I think the second version will be a complete "laptop" with the screen inside the case.

    -Erik Fitzpatrick
    (the creator)

    --

    *******
    "What good is science if no one gets hurt?!" - Professor Chromedome

    1. Re:not that great by TMonks · · Score: 1

      Why not get one of these and rewire the keys into the circuit in your typewriter keyboard to fill in the missing keys? It may not be going along with the retro look (and feel), but at least you can have close to full functionality when you need it.

      --
      I, for one, welcome our new karma-whore sig writing overlords
    2. Re:not that great by fm6 · · Score: 1
      no 1 key
      Should have used a newer typewriter.
      no backspace
      Huh? All typewriters have backspace! It's the only function key that dates back to the pre-teletype keyboard.
      no Escape
      Very curious to know how you're going to get around that!
    3. Re:not that great by zakezuke · · Score: 1

      My wife liked it, but it isn't in use at the moment because of a few drawbacks: no 1 key, no backspace, and no Escape

      I have to admit I rather like the idea of converting the manual style to the modern pc... still I wonder whether or not there is an easier way to meet the desired application of typing that doesn't involve hitting a wall. I often wondered about installing a soft foam layer under the the contact membrain of a normal keyboard to create a softer impact. I find my self tending to slam my fingers into the keyboard with the same result... impact impact impact.

      --
      There is no sanctuary. There is no sanctuary. SHUT UP! There is no shut up. There is no shut up.
  41. Good old Model M by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My wife suffers from repetive stress problems in her fingers and wrists. ...she finds old-fashioned mechanical typewriters much easier on her fingers because they offer gradual resistance rather than the feeling of moving through air then hitting a wall...

    The old Model M IBM keyboards, with it's buckling spring", will meet the requirements, and for keyboard snobs like myself are the only way to type. http://www.3m3718.com/modelm.php http://www.preater.com/modelm/

    1. Re:Good old Model M by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My wife suffers from repetive stress problems in her fingers and wrists.

      Too many handjobs?

    2. Re:Good old Model M by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      My wife suffers from repetive stress problems in her fingers and wrists.

      Too many handjobs?

      He's a computer geek in the basement till wee hours.

      Too many times 'ringing her own doorbell'

  42. There goes my Logitech stock by williepete25 · · Score: 1

    I really thought we had something going with this keyboard/mouse thing.

  43. Re:Read out loud. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Schultz would never put a Starbucks across from a KFC. Trust me, I'm from Seattle, I'd know.

  44. Perl by A+nonymous+Coward · · Score: 1

    Does no one remember The Perl Journal cover from so many years ago, where Perl install was trying to configure itself on a typewriter? I tried googling, didn't find it, but I didn't try too hard either.

  45. SCM had a hybrid keyboard once... by Pig+Hogger · · Score: 1
    When electronic typewriters started to appear, Smith-Corona-Marchant showed an innovative approach at making a keyboard. They used their mechanical keyboard assembly, so it felt just like a typewriter.

    Each key bar stuck a metal rod, which had two piezoelectric microphones, one at each end. It then went to a circuit that calculated the time the sound impact they keybar made as it stuck the metal rod, thus enabling to determine, with the distance it was stuck, which key was pressed...

    1. Re:SCM had a hybrid keyboard once... by Savantissimo · · Score: 1

      That really is a cool hack. The timing must have been finicky, though - milimeter resoution at the speed of sound in steel is pretty impressive.

      --
      "Is life so dear, or peace so sweet, as to be purchased at the price of chains and slavery?" - Patrick Henry
  46. So I shouldn't keep reloading looking for updates? by /dev/trash · · Score: 1

    Did you think that your part of teh web was private?

  47. New Tech Masquerades as Old by MisterSquid · · Score: 1

    Often super new technology calls to mind technology of bygone eras. For example, UNIX-style command lines made a huge comeback in the 1990s among general computer users (the experts never left it). The Matrix provides visual representations of this phenomenon in the form of command centers jury-rigged with rotary phones and virtual staging grounds furnished with leather wing chairs.

    But one of the most memorable versions of this, to my mind, is William Gibson's 1984 Neuromancer which overlays elements of film noir with information technology. Fitzpatrick's typewriter mod calls to my mind Gibson, Burroughs, and the Wachowski brothers, to name a few. The retro-tech feel is just too fucking cool and I wish something like this was available for mere mortals (who don't know how to solder) such as myself.

    The moment where Fitzpatrick's reminded me most of Gibson is when he writes:

    Then I found that a few of the wires had lifted the conductor right off the board so I had to scrape off the green insulation a little further up the circuit to redo it, [. . .] like a junkie looking for a new vein.

    Here, Fitzpatrick seems to be purposefully calling to mind Gibson and Burroughs. Way, way cool stuff, both the mod and the writing.

    Kudos.

    --
    blog
    1. Re:New Tech Masquerades as Old by MichaelSmith · · Score: 1
      But one of the most memorable versions of this, to my mind, is William Gibson's 1984 Neuromancer which overlays elements of film noir with information technology.

      In his novel Idoru Gibson introduced "The Sandbenders" who rebuild laptops with interesting recycled materials. Not specifically retro, except in the sense that each item was a little bit different.

      Near my home there are are people who spend their time making interesting inanimate stuff. Perhaps I should go into business merging modern computers with modern sculpture.

  48. Imagine, if you will... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I, for one, welcome our new @#@%()#@($NOINK

  49. Only 2-1/2 years ago by bXTr · · Score: 1

    Sir, step away from the keyboard, get up, go outside and get some fresh air...preferably in the middle of a large field during a severe thunderstorm.

    --
    It's a very dark ride.
  50. Pounding Keys by sconeu · · Score: 1

    I learned to type on a manual, and with the exception of the Model M, I can't find a keyboard that I like. My wife complains that I pound the keys too hard, and she's right. I learned on an ancient Royal manual, and you had to press HARD on the keys. The habit stuck when I started using computers in the early '80s (adm3a terminals anyone?)....

    Any other oldtimers with this problem?

    --
    General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
    1. Re:Pounding Keys by bhtooefr · · Score: 1

      Stay on the Model M, then - it teaches you to press LIGHTLY on the keys - at about 2/3 of the stroke, the signal is sent.

      A membrane is the absolute worst thing you can do, as it just reinforces keypounding as the method of typing that you should use.

    2. Re:Pounding Keys by number11 · · Score: 1

      I learned to type on a manual, and with the exception of the Model M, I can't find a keyboard that I like. My wife complains that I pound the keys too hard, and she's right. I learned on an ancient Royal manual, and you had to press HARD on the keys.

      Me too, but in the '70s I worked with an electric (IBM "D", then Selectric, then IBM MagCard, which had a keyboard like a Selectric), so I got used to a lighter touch. IMO the Selectric had the finest keyboard of any typing machine ever built (and the original Selectric had the classiest styling). The Model M is the nearest thing to it (I've still got one of the ones with a built-in trackball).

      The habit stuck when I started using computers in the early '80s (adm3a terminals anyone?)....

      IBM Displaywriter, then an ADM21. The LSI keyboards really sucked. But most keyboards today aren't much better.

      Any other oldtimers with this problem?

      Problem?

  51. Great! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm gonna build one, too!

    And then I'm gonna telnet with it to my server.

    Maybe I call mine "The Teletypewriter"... nah, too long, I'll just call it TTY.

    Hmmm, kinda déjà vu...

  52. Why emulate? by fm6 · · Score: 1
    If all you need is character-at-a-time output, why not just use a typewriter? What's the point of emulating one with a computer?

    The whole point of writing with a computer instead of a typewriter (or by hand) is being able to modify what you write before deliver it. If that's something you specifically do not want, you don't need a computer at all.

  53. First paper based key logger! by redphive · · Score: 2, Funny

    I would imagin that key logging would be as simple as placing a piece of paper in the typewriter

  54. Two fun modifications by interstellar_donkey · · Score: 1

    I really like that. It's the kind of thing I've thought of doing myself but, lacking either motivation or the basic knowledge needed, I've never got anywhere further then the daydream stage. Good job.

    There are two things that could be done to make it a bit more enjoyable. The first is to keep the initial type hammers (if that's what they're called--the things which have the actual letter carved into the end that physically rises up and strikes the ribbon and paper) in tact. The circuit isn't completed until it actually hits where the ribbon and paper used to be.

    When I was younger and actually was around manual typewriters, I remember hitting a key, watching the type hammer rise up, and thinking for a moment before completing the stroke if that's the letter I really wanted to use. The result would be a physical, viewable method to see how far the key should be pressed before the computer receives the input, as well as adding to a little auditory feedback, keeping the 'clickty click' sound in tact.

    The second modification, and this involves a great deal of work for something that might end up to be pointless, is to put some sort of pressure sensors on the machine to see how hard the keys are being pressed. Swift, high pressure strikes would be detected and the interface software would autmatically turn on "bold".

    In other words, lightly pressed keys would show up on the screen as light, normal text, while keys struck harder would show up as bold, somewhat simulating the effect you could get with some manual typewriters where the amount of pressure used in a keypress would effect the darkness of the typed letter.

    Granted, that would take a lot of time and effort to engineer, and would likely proove to be an annoyance, as your documents end up with various random bold letters, and would be shut off shortly after development. But, it'd still be neat.

    --
    The Internet is generally stupid
  55. Re:Dupe by JourneyExpertApe · · Score: 1

    My thoughts exactly. Crying dupe's old and played out and just plain getting annoying. When you've seen the article before, you've seen it. Enjoy the new round of comments, or don't, and just move on. I didn't know this was a dupe. I hadn't seen the article before. Don't you dupe-catchers have much better to do with your time than go, "Oh I'm going to show my wealth of /. knowledge by catching a dupe and then wasting my time pulling up the old article and making a post, which I know at least five others will do." It's really tired.

    --
    If you can read this sig, you're too close.
  56. And in other news.... by tacothekid · · Score: 0, Troll

    Device called a "computer" re-invented from old vacuum tubes and relays, calculates 3rd digit of pi in 8 hours. Seriously, I can see some fascination with, and respect for, retro technology. But to create a keyboard from an old manual typewriter? Hardly useful or relevant. Hope you don't like arrow keys either...

    1. Re:And in other news.... by polyp2000 · · Score: 1

      RTFA. It is useful and relevant for his wife who finds using a typewriter more comfortable than a standard computer keyboard due to her long term suffering RSI condition. I think "labour of love" was a term the modder used.

      I think your comment under the circumstances was a cruel and heartless one.

      --
      Electronic Music Made Using Linux http://soundcloud.com/polyp
  57. Look! Dan Rather's typewriter. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We finally found that typewriter that produced Dan Rather's memos.

    1. Re:Look! Dan Rather's typewriter. by mikelieman · · Score: 1

      Memogate, what a great way to get the discussion away from the disturbing little fact that the C-I-C sending American Kids to kill Iraqi's over a pack of lies is a known deserter.

      Hell, iffn he was a REAL Christian Father, he'd TELL those girls of his to enlist so HIS family can take the same risks he's putting our families into.

      --
      Technology -- No Place For Wimps! Grateful Dead and Jerry Garcia Chatroom -- http://www.wemissjerry.org
  58. Re:Dupe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Posting dupes is even worse, but I don't see you writing long posts about that.

  59. TypeWriter Faced Laptop by wehe · · Score: 1

    Here is even a typewriter faced laptop.

    1. Re:TypeWriter Faced Laptop by rrkbogie · · Score: 1

      Finally, a computer keyboard with a morse key accessory!

  60. finally by Arcady13 · · Score: 1

    Finally there is
    a keyboard that
    is suitable for
    the fucking idiots
    who think you
    need to press
    return after every
    third word.

    Does it come with the caps lock permanently turned on, too?

  61. Next by ReidMaynard · · Score: 1

    I will grapple the issue of horseless carriage, with yes, you guessed it, a live horse.

    --
    -- www.globaltics.net

    Political discussion for a new world

  62. jesus christ another dupe by kayen_telva · · Score: 1

    2 seconds with the search feature
    you dont even use your own search functionality ?

  63. You think that's cool..? by kronocide · · Score: 1

    That's just because you haven't seen this:

    The ElectriClerc
    Fully functional retrofitted prop computer

    Built for a game of Cthulhu Lives! that has yet to be played, this piece was inspired by the retro-futuristic machines in the movie Brazil by Terry Gilliam.
    http://www.ahleman.com/Props/ElectriClerk.html

  64. Key debounce? by zotz · · Score: 1

    Yes, but does it have a key debounce issue and has it been solved. With the old TRS-80 Model I machines I used to work with, I think there used to be a program you could get that would solve this issue for you. It is probably still under copyright though and they probably never GPLed it so we may have to start again from scratch!

    all the best,

    drew

    http://www.ourmedia.org/node/41879

    --
    FreeMusicPush If you want to see more Free Music made, listen to Free
  65. Why is F better than M? by FatSean · · Score: 0

    Is it the key-feel or is it just geek cred for having a rare technology?

    --
    Blar.
    1. Re:Why is F better than M? by ivan256 · · Score: 1

      For me, neither; it's the durability.

      I can wear out the keyboard that comes with any recent (last two years) Dell in under three months. It will still work, but the keys will get bound up unless you're carefull to push directly downward (which is almost impossible on the spacebar).

      There are membrane keyboards that fit the bill, but they are typically as expensive as a Model M, or harder to find. Older Dell keyboards from before the "QuietKey" are OK. My favorite membrane keyboard is the Digital RT101, which I am using right now. I've been using it for 10 years and it feels like new still. Unfortunatly, it doesn't have windows keys, and I do like having the extra modifiers. Emacs is much friendlier with a real Meta key.

      For some reason all the keyboards I like are noisy. I guess it sucks to be the guy who has to work in the next cube over from me.

  66. Re:Dupe by 1u3hr · · Score: 1
    sometimes (gasp) am away from /. for days at a time and don't have time to sift through the Older Stuff section.

    I guess you're trolling, but that makes no sense at all, unless you're Steven Hawking and take 10 seconds to hit each keystroke. The dupes are duped not because they're important (obviously, this one hardly is), but due to incompetence. If your time is so valuable, why are you reading and commenting on this trivial story about a two year old novelty?

  67. Slashdot by windowpain · · Score: 1

    Old news for Nerds. Stuff that doesn't matter.

    --
    Insert witty sig here.
  68. IBM Selectric II by csb · · Score: 1

    I'd love to see a Selectric keyboard. There's something unique about the thrum of the power supply, the warmth, the heaviness of the keys, and the resistance when you press them.

    I learned on a Selectric, in high school typing class. All computer keyboards are a letdown after that. Good times... *snif*

    --
    We reserve the right to serve refuse to anyone. -management
  69. RTFA! by epsalon · · Score: 1

    The typewriter has a BackSpace key, but it was too hard to wire.