Slashdot Mirror


Bell Labs Unix Group Disbanded

wandazulu writes "Peter Salus over at UnixReview.com is reporting that AT&T Department 1127, responsible for creating and maintaining Unix, has been officially disbanded. The article provides an interesting "where are they now?" list of the original authors of Unix."

62 of 270 comments (clear)

  1. we've still got Google, for now by yagu · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I think this is sad, and a little ominous. I worked at a telco years ago, and managed to fanagle a chat on the phone with Ritchie one time when a Bell worker was on site for some software installations. Cool.

    Anyway, in my arguments to encourage research into trying new ways of doing things, I always used Bell Labs as my favorite example/reason why we should. Guess I won't have that anymore. Sigh.

    What I fear most is the lack of research for research's sake. A lot of things we use today are a direct or indirect result of companies allowing a certain amount of "what if" thinking and activity to go on. Even better, some companies, like Bell Labs actually allocated specifically for that.

    I don't think research in commercial context is really research at all and may even be counterproductive in creating new and better technology (if commercial research into products were for "quality", would there even be a Britney Spears?).

    The last bastion I know of and trust is Google. They seem to be dedicated to the cause. But, they're young, they're new, and they haven't had to deal with stockholders in bad times yet.

    1. Re:we've still got Google, for now by zardo · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Google doesn't do any research. What does google do? They may facilitate research with their books.google.com and whatnot, but everything they do is money motivated. They make huge amounts of money. If your feelings were accurate google would be spending a lot more on research.

      There is a lot of research that goes on you just never hear about it. How about http://www.stirlingengine.com/ or http://www.nanosolar.com/ ?? Those companies founders are risking it all, and if they fail, you'll never hear about it.

    2. Re:we've still got Google, for now by toddbu · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Or perhaps it's because there's high-quality research going on in garages and dorm rooms across the country. Back when a "cheap" computer costs thousands of dollars, people had to cooperate because of resource constraints. Now I can pull a used PC out of the trash and create the world's best software with virtually no investment other than my time.

      It's tough to say goodbye to an old friend, but I'd never want to go back to the "good old days" that spawned those conditions.

      --
      If you don't want crime to pay, let the government run it.
    3. Re:we've still got Google, for now by CondeZer0 · · Score: 5, Informative
      First of all, Linux is just an Unix clone, and it never had many fans at Bell Labs.

      And Bell Labs gave up Unix _long_ ago:
      Not only is UNIX dead, it's starting to smell really bad. -- Rob Pike circa 1991

      Bell Labs moved from Unix to Plan 9 in the late 80' and then went on to work on Inferno.

      Both Plan 9 and Inferno are Open Source now and live on outside Bell Labs, but their developers like to be very quiet, they rather code than talk or maintain websites.

      But here are a couple of links:


      And also many of the ideas of Plan 9 and Inferno live on as part of other projects like v9fs(9P distributed file system protocol support for Linux), Plan 9 from User Space(a port of many Plan 9 components to Unix), and wmii(a window manager partially inspired by Acme.)
      --
      "When in doubt, use brute force." Ken Thompson
    4. Re:we've still got Google, for now by Alien+Being · · Score: 2, Informative

      "Due to anti-trust restriction, AT&T was never allowed to market or profit from UNIX."

      They were free to compete in the computer industry after the divestiture of 1984.

      http://www.obsoletecomputermuseum.org/3b2/

      They sold tens of thousands of those things.

    5. Re:we've still got Google, for now by Crixus · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I agree completely. The single most important factor in research (and it can't be controlled) is SERENDIPITY.

          All areas of research must be funded, because they often yield interesting stuff not sought for. I can not express this strongly enough.

        Rich...

      --
      Ignore Alien Orders
    6. Re:we've still got Google, for now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

      This is common knowledge(and shared feeling) by anyone that ever had anything to do with Bell Labs.

      Some of it even made headlines eons ago, most links seem to be dead by now, but I found a slashdot article about it, title could not be more explicit:

      Thompson Critical of Linux, poor ESR was so taken aback that had to go ask for a "clarification" from Ken.

      Hell, go read 9fans, not one week goes by without someone expressing how much they 'love' Linux(or Lunix, as it's known there).

      Oh, oh, and here is another quote taken directly from the Plan 9 fortunes file:

      Linux: written by amateurs for amateurs. - D. Presotto

      And of course the classic:

      This is not LINUX! This is Plan 9. There are rules. -boyd/walter

    7. Re:we've still got Google, for now by Coryoth · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Anyway, in my arguments to encourage research into trying new ways of doing things, I always used Bell Labs as my favorite example/reason why we should.

      That's okay, you just need to change what Bell Labs is an example of. I mean really, what has Bell Labs produced recently? Some very impressive stuff if you actually look at some of what has managed to trickle it's way out. Things like Plan9 and Inferno are actually very impressive indeed in terms of the core ideas (that is, the part the research division is responsible for). Had a little more money been thrown into really building something out of those they could have been huge. So really Bell Labs is an example of what happens when management stops paying attention to, and having faith in, their research department.

      Want another example. How about Microsoft research? They have some very good people there, Tony Hoare and Leslie Lamport to name just two off the top of my head. If you dig around through some of the stuff they are working on there's some amazing ideas there. How much of that is actually seeing the light of day and making it into product? Very very little.

      The reason Google seems so good is not because they have more good people doing research - in practice they probably don't. It's because management spends more time listening to and working with the research teams to see that those ideas actually get used.

      The death of Bell Labs is just another example of what happens when the research department gets ignored. And yes, I am a bit bitter, having worked in a research department that regularly got ignored.

      Jedidiah.

    8. Re:we've still got Google, for now by JoeBuck · · Score: 5, Insightful
      No, there isn't high-quality research going on in garages and dorm rooms. Lots of entrepreneurs doing skunk-works projects, and that's great. But they don't have the level of funding, or the long-term perspective, that would let them invent the next laser or the next transistor (both products of Bell Labs), and they are too focused on a quick killing to discover the microwave remnant of the Big Bang (also from Bell Labs).

      We still have the universities, and IBM still has a sizable research division. But the exclusive focus by most of today's companies on the next quarter's revenue means we're eating the seed corn.

    9. Re:we've still got Google, for now by Air-conditioned+cowh · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Now I can pull a used PC out of the trash and create the world's best software with virtually no investment other than my time.

      Uh uh! Not so fast. We have software patents to stop any such subversive activity!

    10. Re:we've still got Google, for now by zardo · · Score: 2, Interesting
      No, you look at labs.google.com tell me how any of that is research? They call it the lab for public relations reasons. Making an image search utility is not research, neither is buying picassa, or buying a mapping company, it simply isn't research, it's capital investment.

      Bell spent billions on research, the "apple man" voice was invented at bell labs, they did a whole lot of voice synthesis research that I am familiar with. They did a lot of other stuff, I am not as familiar with, but voice synthesis, voice recognition, that is research. They were on the cutting edge as a matter of fact.

      I think there is supporting evidence that Microsoft actually does do valuable research, I'm not one of these anti-MS zealots, they could do more though. Bill Gates donates a lot of money to charity which is noble of him also.

    11. Re:we've still got Google, for now by demachina · · Score: 5, Insightful

      An important thread to note here is that none other than Carly Fiorina is the one of the principals in spinning off Lucent and Bell Labs from AT&T. She looked like a superstar for it though in fact Lucent was mostly just a beneficiary of being a telecom/networking company during the bubble when none could fail. Their stock history is interesting from a peak around $80 in 2000 to $2.88 today. Carly's time in the sun at Lucent was from the spinoff in 1996 until she jumped to HP in 1999. Here is a glowing Businessweek article on her when she took the helm at HP then. One interesting quote:

      "she helped to turbocharge product development by the long-coddled Bell Labs engineers."

      A guy told me once on an airplane beware any company or person who makes the cover of Businessweek because it usually means they've peaked and are starting down. He said it in context of SGI and its a rule that worked just as well for Carly.

      Hindsight being 20/20 you have to wonder if Carly didn't get lucky at Lucent thanks to the bubble and she was made to look like a superstar when in fact she was a one women wrecking ball for research and development at both Lucent/Bell Labs and HP and its labs.

      Another Carly theme at Bell Labs, if you go to their web site today they are a case study in out sourcing with their greatest achievement today looking to be the fact that they have labs in China, India and Ireland.

      --
      @de_machina
    12. Re:we've still got Google, for now by fbg111 · · Score: 5, Informative
      Google doesn't do any research. What does google do?

      I don't know about that. Google's mission is to "Organize the world's information". Considering such an undertaking has never before been attempted on such a scale (unless you count Yahoo's manual indexing), then I suspect Google engages in quite a bit of advanced research. Why else would they hire brilliant, accomplished PhDs and encourage them to research and publish. It's certainly not to master AJAX web scripting techniques. Granted, Google's research is in more nebulous areas of unstructured datamining, information retrieval, algorithms, AI, OS & filesystem design, and maybe they won't develop the next general, purpose Unix or better materials for spaceship construction, but I wouldn't go so far as to say they don't do research. A brief list of their research areas are:
      • algorithms
      • artificial intelligence
      • genetic algorithms
      • machine learning
      • natural language processing
      • robotics
      (From Papers by Googlers)

      You might say they're standing on the shoulders of the giants of Bell Labs and Xerox PARC, but in terms of computer science, show us someone who isn't. That doesn't mean Google's research could be any less important or ground breaking. And don't underestimate the value of the knowledge aggregation and improving language translation ability of their search engine. Who knows how this could affect human civilization, maybe even to the point of speeding up our advancement by connecting minds with more relevant information more quickly than the printing press, the worthless main stream media, and even P2P email allowed. Only time will tell...
      --
      Flying is easy, just throw yourself at the ground and miss. -Douglas Adams
  2. Insensitive by agm · · Score: 4, Insightful

    From TFA:

    "My take is that 1127 probably reached Schiavo status when Rob, Presotto, et al. fled west to Google.

    That expression is a tad insensitive, don't you think?

    1. Re:Insensitive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Nothing compared to what was done to her.

      What? You mean kept alive longer than reasonable for herself and her parents? Yeah, that was sick

    2. Re:Insensitive by Zen+Punk · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Well, it was a direct qoute of an employee that was interviewed, so it's important for them to include it, bad taste notwithstanding.

      --
      Sleep is futile.
    3. Re:Insensitive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      My guess is it would be something like this: to finally be allowed the honor to die gracefully after being kept "alive" on life support for an inordinate amount of time without hope of recovery.

      Pretty close to what's going on with 1127, so...

    4. Re:Insensitive by WindBourne · · Score: 5, Insightful

      For politics, and religion is all. She was nothing but a vegtable. I feel sorry for her husband who had to be dragged through the mud by GWB, Jeb, Frist, Focus on the Family, etc. Even after it was over, Jeb tried anything that he could to make him look bad for simply doing what his wife wanted in the first place.

      Personally, I would love to see him sue all of them. But I am guessing that he just wants it over with and to be away from all the idiots.

      --
      I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    5. Re:Insensitive by endersdouble · · Score: 3, Funny

      Would you like someone to call the waaaaaambulance?

    6. Re:Insensitive by multiplexo · · Score: 4, Funny
      From TFA:

      "My take is that 1127 probably reached Schiavo status when Rob, Presotto, et al. fled west to Google.

      That expression is a tad insensitive, don't you think?

      Yes, it is insensitive. He should have said "My take is that 1127 probably reached George W. Bush status when Rob, Presotto, et al. fled west to Google.

      --
      cheap labor conservatives - they want to keep you hungry enough to be thankful for minimum wage.
    7. Re:Insensitive by demachina · · Score: 2, Funny

      Maybe the sick part was the non stop media bombardment with the same video of her when she was a vegetable, over and over. It brings to mind the SouthPark episode where Kenny is a vegetable, and the lawyer lost the last page of his living will. So Kenny ends up exploited on TV by Cartman's pull the plug faction, and Stan and Kyle's keep him alive faction. When the lawyer finds the last page of the will his one wish is if he ends up a vegetable DON'T PUT HIM ON TV.

      --
      @de_machina
    8. Re:Insensitive by cold+fjord · · Score: 2, Informative
      She was nothing but a vegtable. I feel sorry for her husband who had to be dragged through the mud by GWB, Jeb, Frist, Focus on the Family, etc. Even after it was over, Jeb tried anything that he could to make him look bad for simply doing what his wife wanted in the first place.

      Doing what his wife wanted in the first place? Hardly.
      Terri Schiavo collapsed from unknown causes in 1990 and experienced a devastating brain injury. Michael brought a medical malpractice case in which he promised the jury that he would provide Terri with rehabilitation and care for her for the rest of his life. The jury in 1993 awarded $1.3 million in damages, approximately $750,000 of which was set aside to pay for her care and rehabilitation. But once the money was in the bank, Michael refused to provide Terri with any rehab. Moreover, within months, he had a do-not-resuscitate order placed on her chart.

      How many hundreds of thousands of dollars does it take to pull the plug immediately, if that was really her wish?

      Of course, the family had an interest in her welfare as well, but that does complicate the whole "GWB, Jeb, Frist, Focus.." story, eh?

      Had she died then, Michael would have inherited all the money. But he denies having a venal motive, claiming that the trust fund money is now exhausted. If true, this is bitterly ironic. For the past three years he has been in litigation, opposed by Terri's parents and her other relatives. Rather than the funds going to pay for medical therapists to help her, as the jury intended, much of it instead paid lawyers that Michael retained to obtain the court order to end her care.

      Michael's second conflict of interest is deeply personal. He is engaged to be married and has had a baby with his fiancée, with another one on the way. The couple would like to marry, but Michael's wife, inconveniently, is still alive.

      If it really was her wish, he should have done it immediately, not after suing to get money for her rehabilitation and support, and before shacking up with another woman.
      --
      much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don't even know that fire is hot - George Orwell
  3. Linux Labs. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    "The article provides an interesting "where are they now?" list of the original authors of Unix."

    They've joined Linco. Developing cutting-edge technology to put into a commodity OS. With Linus as Director.

  4. The real question is by igny · · Score: 5, Funny

    What is cooking at Department # 1337.

    --
    In theory there is no difference between theory and practice. In practice there is. - Yogi Berra
    1. Re:The real question is by paulius_g · · Score: 5, Funny

      They're just a bunch of 14 year olds playing Counter-Strike and "pwning n00bs".

      Very complicated stuff, I must admit.

  5. And all the nerds sing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    "Goodbye Dep. 1127 and thank you for all the code"

    Thank you 1127 :)

  6. Good times by saddino · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I worked at Bell Labs in Murray Hill from 1985 through 1989, and though I did not work in Dept 1127, I did get the amazing chance to see what Bell Labs was all about: the incredible, vibrant home to tremendously talented scientists from the UNIX gurus to the low temperature physics gods. As a young high school and then college student, aspiring to join their ranks full time, I was mesmerized by the environment where a 2pm coffee break could evolve into a deep discussion of networking theory and then reflect sincerely on the goings-on in the world. Bell Labs was a magical place, and hopefully, the seeds of similar pure research incubators are being sewn in today's tech powerhouses such as Google.

    1. Re:Good times by blackbear · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I've had more good ideas from conversations on long coffee breaks than I care to remember. And they usually saved the company money, or fixed something. The ability to get away from a problem and take your mind productively in another direction has, for me, usually been a function of having talented and intelligent people around to share ideas with.

      These days, if you're seen having a conversation of longer than two minutes you start to get the attention of management. Geeks aren't like everyone else, and they aren't motivated in the usual ways or by the usual things.

      The effort now, seems to be to put armies of non-geeks at the keyboard, hoping that they can make up with numbers and procedures what they lack in talent. I just hope that this one doesn't turn out like The Celts vs. The Romans.

      Hey! Maybe we should sacrifice a secretary to the god of system stability. Just be sure to start the fire with a printout of the last core dump.

    2. Re:Good times by triple6 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I was lucky enough to work in Building 2 for a couple of years and am happy to have been in Murray Hill at all. It was as magical a place as everyone says. Just being around so many great thinkers made me feel smarter too. I'll certainly miss it. (I wonder if the pjw's xface made of magnets still appears at the top of Stair 8)

  7. Great contributions made by Sv-Manowar · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Its a shame to see this department go, given the great contributions made by it to the state of modern operating systems. Of course Unix lives on in other forms, and its testament to the strength of the operating system that its free workalikes and variants have been as rampantly successful in developing and thriving. I can't help but wonder whether Plan 9 is affected at all by the demise..

    1. Re:Great contributions made by rah1420 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The wiki at the Plan 9 website has activity as recently as August 14 of this year, so I'd say that it still has a pulse.

      --
      Mit der Dummheit kämpfen Götter selbst vergebens.
  8. Re:Serious question... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    dude, they wrote UNIX. Buy a clue (or some Ritchie/Kernighan editions) and get back to installing your nightly windoze patches.

  9. Another name to add to the list... by GillBates0 · · Score: 4, Interesting
    Steve Johnson - a 20 year veteran of Bell Labs, author of yacc, lint and the pcc, and former president of USENIX now works at Mathworks.

    I had the good fortune of meeting the gentleman when I interviewed with Mathworks a couple of years ago. I was taken aback by his humility, and the poor guy was embarrassed when I requested his autograph :) He has a former license plate in his office that reads "YACCMAN".

    --
    An Indian-American Hindu committed to non-violent thought/speech/action alarmed by the global explosion of radical Islam
  10. I can't help the nostalgy by darthgnu · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Great job guys, your legacy shall be remembered. Hopefully, history will learn that creating barriers to knowledge only leads to trouble. I see FS/OSS as the future, but K&R shall be remebered.

    --
    Freedom is strength, Ignorance is peace, War is slavery.
  11. Schiavo Status by James_Aguilar · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Besides being totally tasteless (it was), the following quote does have the redeeming feature that it illustrates why you shouldn't be discouraged.

    "My take is that 1127 probably reached Schiavo status when Rob, Presotto, et al. fled west to Google."

    Although the unnamed employee goes on to say that it's a nail in the coffin of the "sort of research environment Bell Labs once represented," he neglects to mention that there is still tons of work that is being done in computing science-related research all over the nation and all over the world. Although it's fine to feel sentimental, let's not go over the top with saying that Google is the "last bastion" of anything. We see the demise of Bell Labs' Unix group as a big thing because it has a lot of history; now think how many tens or hundreds of places that someday will have a lot of history are out there right now; as yet unknown, but destined to be giants in the future.

  12. Let's us not forget by stox · · Score: 3, Informative

    Joe Ossanna and Lee McMahon. Both made significant contributions which made UNIX, as we know it today, possible.

    Another important contributor, Michael Lesk, is currently on the faculty at Rutgers University.

    I'm sure there are many more that deserve recognition.

    --
    "To those who are overly cautious, everything is impossible. "
    1. Re:Let's us not forget by stox · · Score: 3, Informative

      Lee died in 1989. Although still way too young, he had probably made most of his major achievments and his children were adults. Joe, on the other hand, died in a tragic accident in 1977, just as he was really hitting his stride. I don't know if he had any children. Had Joe lived, I suspect that troff would have ruled the world, or a direct decendant. Sadly, after Joe died, development of troff pretty much froze solid. Every memo and publication I have ever read from Joe Ossanna indicated, to me at least, that he would have been a true giant in the computing community.

      --
      "To those who are overly cautious, everything is impossible. "
  13. Doug McIlroy by theoddball · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Hell of a guy, and a prof who's still teaching undergrads. Bell Labs is where he did his best work, but he's still a very, very sharp guy.

    I mean, there's something to be said for learning data structures and operating systems from a guy who helped invent the idea of pipes.

    McIlroy's homepage.

  14. Re:Serious question... by quanticle · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Does the invention of the entire C programming language count?

    --
    We all know what to do, but we don't know how to get re-elected once we have done it
  15. Re:about freakin' time by fishlet · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It's a troll... but I just gotta bite.
    A chair is ancient technology, but I'm happy to be sitting in one as I read slashdot today. Not all things are wrong just because they are old.

  16. not an AT&T department by anothy · · Score: 4, Informative

    just for clarity, there hasn't been an AT&T department 1127 since 1996; when Lucent split off, 1127, along with the rest of Bell Labs, went with them. this is a Lucent re-org.

    --

    i speak for myself and those who like what i say.
  17. IBM still does research.... by HockeyPuck · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Although IBM http://www.research.ibm.com/ may be out of the disk drive business, they are still working on it. Take a look at the Almaden Research Center in San Jose http://www.almaden.ibm.com/ still going strong after all these years.

    1. Re:IBM still does research.... by TollBooth · · Score: 3, Interesting

      The point that IBM is interested in profit is moot. My point was that IBM still actively pursues pure research whereas Google does not.

      The reason IBM Research remains today is that they were able to adapt and find a balance between profitability and pure research. My grip is that Google is being portrayed as the last keeper of this "dead" field and it is my belief that they are most certainly not.

      IBM Research was key in the development of the PC, relational databases, datamining, and countless other fields. One of the reasons IBM got out of the harddrive business was because research had progress so fast that noone was using it. Practically none of the harddrive businesses are profitable, except maybe Hitachi.

      However, IBM still is doing harddrive research, one major is example is the super dense stamp sized 1 GB harddrives that was mentioned here at some point. I don't think it's too much to ask to give IBM Research at nod for actually performing Research!

    2. Re:IBM still does research.... by T_Slothrop · · Score: 2, Interesting

      It is certainly true that IBM does still pursue pure research (I work there, at Watson Labs), but Google does as well: all researchers there are encouraged to spend 10% (I think that is the number) of their time working on research of their choice. I believe that Rob Pike mentioned doing astrophysics work of some sort (correct me if I'm wrong--though I am sure it is unnecessary to say that in this forum!). It is hard to imagine what short-term benefit Google will gain from that.

  18. Diminishing Talent Pool? by ArticleI · · Score: 2, Interesting

    It seems like they would have a hard time attracting the talent to keep the group open. My dad, an 18 year Bell Labs veteran, left Telcordia /Bellcore/Bell Labs five years ago. The downturn in the tech industry forced many others to leave for more lucrative jobs while they were still available. Two of the math/CS teachers at my old high school were from Bell, for instance.

  19. Re:What did they do that B[erkeley]SD guys didn't by blackbear · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Right. I mean Newton just invented calculus. Einstein really pushed it forward and did things with it. Not to knock Newton, since calculus is a really big deal. And his work with harmonic motion was great.

    But the stuff you really think about and use, like time dialation, that was all Einstein. And Newtonion Mechanics is hardly state of the art.

    Einstein, Heisenberg, and others must have looked back and thought; "What did you really contribute, Newton? You didn't even have the concept of light having a finite speed."

    No one ever stood on the shoulders of giant before, right?

  20. Re:Serious question... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    A few things come to mind

    1) Making the command interpreter a user level process instead of an integral part of the kernel.

    2) Treating all files as simple streams of data. Mainframes of the day that I've had experience with all forced some type of record format on files.

    3) Making everything visible to the sytem as a file(file systems, devices, message queues). On other systems these are handled via special reserved words understood by the command interpreter or system.

    4) Pipes between processes.

    5) The C programming language itself.

    Much of this seems like common sense today, but they were new ideas around 1970. Some of them were probably taken from other research operating sytems of the time and reimplemented as software patents were'nt the problem they are today.

  21. Re:about freakin' time by LnxAddct · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Oh shit! Calculus has roots going back like a few millenium (Ancient Egyptians), we better get rid of that stuff quickly! Let's move on, kids.
    Regards,
    Steve

  22. Like it or not, Microsoft does a lot of research. by Thornkin · · Score: 2, Informative

    Bell labs, DEC, and Xerox PARC may be things of the past, but Microsoft is funding a lot of general research today. This is not product R&D but basic research of the sort done at many of the big companies of the past. Check out their website for a list of some current topics. They employ over 700 people doing everything from pure algorithms to graphics to networking.

  23. Re:Like it or not, Microsoft does a lot of researc by GenKreton · · Score: 2, Insightful

    What good does all their research do if it's going to end up in half-assed implementations and closed to the world so we cannot benefit from it?

  24. Re:Like it or not, Microsoft does a lot of researc by 2nd+Post! · · Score: 2, Funny

    Too bad their contributions to society can be measured in terms of:
    Clippy
    Wizards
    Exploits
    GUI inconsistencies
    Flight simulators
    BASIC

  25. Re:What did they do that B[erkeley]SD guys didn't by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    Well . . . . Gottfried Leibniz came up with calculus at (broadly speaking) roughly the same time as Newton, but where Newton failed to publicly talk about his work in this regard, Leibniz did. Which then created a huge argument over priority, with poor behaviour on both sides . . . .

  26. Re:What did they do that B[erkeley]SD guys didn't by blackbear · · Score: 4, Funny

    Right. But I can actually spell Newton, so he gets the credit.

  27. Re:about freakin' time by inode_buddha · · Score: 2, Informative

    The transistor is 1940's technology. Did you know that there's a few zillion of them in the computer that you used to post that? Guess who invented the transistor? Bell Labs.

    --
    C|N>K
  28. Re:Like it or not, Microsoft does a lot of researc by jericho4.0 · · Score: 2, Interesting
    You won't catch me singing Microsofts praises too often, but MS Research is an important contributer to CS today. For example, they employ Simon Peyton Jones, the guy behind Haskell and GHC.

    --
    "A language that doesn't affect the way you think about programming, is not worth knowing" - Alan Perlis
  29. Re:What did they do that B[erkeley]SD guys didn't by linguae · · Score: 2, Informative

    Yes, the BSD guys; McKusick, Joy, Karels, and a few other people that I have forgotten, have made some huge contributions to the Unix world (you can thank Bill Joy for vi and the C shell). You can also thank them, as well as Bill Jolitz, for being able to run freely available BSD derivatives on your PCs. However, the original Unix 32V sources (which BSD was derived from until Karels decided to purge BSD of all AT&T "taint" in the late 80s), the orignial kernels, the original programs, and many of the original basic ideas came from Bell Labs and from Kernighan, Ritchie, Thompson, Ossana, Pike, Johnson, and many more people that I have also forgotten.

    The original Berkeley Software Distribution developers have made an enormous impact on the computer science and computing worlds in general, most notably its TCP/IP implementation. However, let's not forget where BSD actually comes from. BSD is a direct derivative from good-old Bell Labs Unix. Some BSD sources to this day still have some AT&T copyright notices (even though they're under the BSD license).

  30. What is Salus talking about? by Marc+Rochkind · · Score: 5, Informative
    I was at Bell Labs from 1970 to 1982, and I don't remember any Dept. 1127. My 1980 Bell Labs Directory shows a Dept. 1271, led by McIlroy, consisting of Cherry, Morris, Thompson, Aho, Baker, Lengaauer, Syzmanski, Weinberger, and Yannakakis. Its sibling, Dept. 1273, led by Fraser, consisted of Chesson, Kernighan, Ritchie, Stroustrup, Vollaro, Johnson, Ditzel, Elliott, and Feldman. (No Pike--I don't think he was at Bell Labs yet.)

    I guess everyone thinks that Thompson and Ritchie were in the same department during the 1970s, but I do remember always knowing that they were not.

    Note that by 1980 UNIX-related OS research at Bell Labs was nearly completed. Development of UNIX, which is where I worked, was very active and remained so for another 10+ years, but that's different from research. (Center 127 did research in many areas unrelated to UNIX.)

    So, undoubtedly there was a recent reorg and some department went away, and maybe it was even 1127, but what that means, if anything (since Thompson, Kernighan, and others left a while ago), I have no idea.

    Anyway, I think the gist of the article and most of the responses here is that it's sad that AT&T and Lucent are no longer combined and able to spend as lavishly on research as they once did. That part of this thread is true.

    A few posts are from Bell Labs people who said it was a great place to work, and that's true, too.

    1. Re:What is Salus talking about? by td · · Score: 3, Informative

      Confirmed -- I worked in 1127 from 1984 to 1996. Bell Labs department numbers were path labels in the org chart. I was in Area 11 (Research, as opposed to one of the many development areas), Division 112 (Information Sciences), Center 1127 (Computing Science Research), Department 11273 (which had some meaningless name that I forget -- Computing Structures Research or Computing Techniques Research or something. Departments in Center 1127 were mostly not organized thematically, but were a convenience to spread the management load around -- for example, Ken & Dennis were in different departments.) Sometime in the early '80s, before I arrived, all the Area names grew an extra digit, presumably because some organizational change made there be more than 9 subtrees at that level.

      --
      -Tom Duff
  31. Re:Serious question... by jdh41 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    You see, to me, mindless applications of fourier transforms and other mathematical techniques describes engineering, whereas coming up with new ideas and algorithms describes research.

  32. Re:What did they do that B[erkeley]SD guys didn't by TeknoHog · · Score: 4, Funny
    No one ever stood on the shoulders of giant before, right?

    No. If I have been able to see further, it is because I am surrounded by midgets.

    --
    Escher was the first MC and Giger invented the HR department.
  33. Re:Serious question... by DogDude · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Engineering is called "applied science". Research is called "pure science". Pure science is always the basis for applied science. It's hard to make a transistor if you don't know what the hell an electron is and how it acts.

    --
    I don't respond to AC's.
  34. Kernighan did not WRITE Unix by waffffffle · · Score: 2, Informative

    Kernighan was my professor at Princeton and my advisor for my senior independent work here. I interviewed him for an anthropology paper in 2002 and he made it very clear that he did not create Unix and wasn't very involved in the creation process. The same goes for the C language, which is often attributed to him as well.

    What Brian Kernighan DID do is write the book on Unix and C, literally. He co-wrote both books. (The Unix book is in Wayne's World 2.) He is also responsible for awk (a favorite tool of mine) and AMPL. He told me back then that he would go down to Bell on Fridays so he wasn't completely removed from the process.

    A couple years ago when I was a senior I was at a recruiting event in the CS department and a couple guys from Bell Labs were there. They seemed really depressed about the state of everything, complaining about how the company no longer maintains the think tank for the purpose of increasing knowledge and all of their efforts were being focused towards creating phone switches. Needless to say that didn't peak the interest of any of the students in the room.