Slashdot Mirror


Another Major Spammer Busted

Iphtashu Fitz writes "25 year old Christopher William Smith, considered one of the worlds biggest spammers by the Spamhaus Project, is now sitting in a jail without bond. Smith allegedly had a doctor issue 72,000 prescriptions in the space of one year in conjunction with orders obtained through spamming. The doctor, Philip Mach, had a license to practice medicine in New Jersey but he provided prescriptions to people throughout the United States without ever evaluating them, both of which are big no-no's. Federal authorities have already seized over $3 million in cash, luxury cars, and houses."

82 of 487 comments (clear)

  1. Real Crime is Organised by ackthpt · · Score: 5, Interesting
    From ABC News: A Minnesota man considered one of the world's most prolific e-mail spammers was indicted on more than a dozen federal charges related to the operation of his business, Xpress Pharmacy Direct.
    70-80% of my spam used to come from this guy. It seems every time one of these weasels gets hauled in there's a dip in spam. In the past two days my spammage has dropped to a trickle. The past three nights total spam: 173, 43, 17
    Also from ABC News: The indictment against Christopher William Smith, 25, was unsealed Wednesday after he was arrested at his home in Prior Lake. Dr. Philip Mach, 47, of Franklin Park, N.J., and Bruce Jordan Lieberman, 45, from Farmingdale, N.Y., were also charged in the indictment, federal prosecutors said.
    <Nelson Muntz*>
    Ha hah!
    </Nelson Muntz>

    Smith allegedly had a doctor issue 72,000 prescriptions in the space of one year

    Which just goes to prove to be a really big drug dealer you need a computer and connections, not just to hang out in your Accura in McDonald's parking lot late at night.

    * Nelson Muntz appears in this posting courtesy Twentieth Century Fox and Matt Groening.

    --

    A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    1. Re:Real Crime is Organised by ackthpt · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Doesn't seem likely this had anything to do with your recent drop in spam.

      Actually it does. The big drops happened earlier this year, but every time there is an arrest it seems there's a dip, as if all the spammers have taken notice and are limiting their visibility, until they feel the threat to them has passed, or they determine to take their profits and quit while ahead.

      I have no doubt that it'll pick right up again, within the next ten days.

      --

      A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    2. Re:Real Crime is Organised by Guspaz · · Score: 2, Interesting

      There is a dip in spam? Who cares! Almost all of the junk mail I get these days are phishing mails, not spam.

    3. Re:Real Crime is Organised by b1t+r0t · · Score: 2, Interesting
      70-80% of my spam used to come from this guy. It seems every time one of these weasels gets hauled in there's a dip in spam. In the past two days my spammage has dropped to a trickle.

      Wow, and I thought it was just me... the past two days I was wondering if my e-mail server was broken! I run my own domain, and have port 25 blocked from all Chinese and Korean netblocks, but I still get a few a day. Almost none got through the past two days.

      --

      --
      "Open source is good." - Steve Jobs
      "Open source is evil." - Microsoft
    4. Re:Real Crime is Organised by ackthpt · · Score: 3, Insightful
      This guy's been out of business for months. He was indicted today, but shutdown months ago.

      Exactly. What I alluded to was the action of his actual arrest causing a dip in activity of other spammers, rather like everyone runs onto the beach when a shark attacks, never mind they are well aware that sharks are in the water at all times.

      This was clarified in a reply to one of the above posts.

      --

      A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
  2. 72,000!! by TurdTapper · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Holy Crap! FTA: Prosecutors allege Smith had Mach issue about 72,000 prescriptions from July 2004 to about May 2005.

    Now, I freely admit that I don't have a clue about how prescriptions are handled, but isn't 72,000 prescriptions just a little much? Would't someone have gotten a touch suspicious that this guy was writing them out at a rate of 1 prescription every 7 seconds? Or is there not enough infrastructure to be able to tell how many a doctor has written?

    It obviously had to be done electronically (Or else he would have had to write an awful lot). How does that work? I've only ever had prescriptions that were hand written out by the doctor.

    I guess I'm just amazed that it took them that long to realize something was wrong.

    --
    A man with a gun is called a citizen. A man without a gun is called a subject.
    1. Re:72,000!! by Alex+P+Keaton+in+da · · Score: 2, Insightful

      How does that work? I've only ever had prescriptions that were hand written out by the doctor.
      Usually,the doctor (or his office) can call or fax the pharmacy the prescription.
      Although in this case, it seems like a bit of the old illegality....
      This case also proves a bit of regulatory ineptness, I mean, doctors and pharmacies are highly regulated, how could they miss this guy writing this many prescriptions for so long?

      --
      And All I Ask is a Tall Ship And a Star to Steer Her By
    2. Re:72,000!! by gcatullus · · Score: 3, Informative

      The scripts were all for use at the spammers own pharmacy

    3. Re:72,000!! by EvilMagnus · · Score: 4, Insightful

      And the corrolary from that is that how on *earth* did the doctor think he'd get away with that? The DEA has systems that track that kind of thing, and they're *very* public in letting doctors know about it. Supposedly the DEA monitors annual prescription rates of proscribed medications (pain meds, mostly) . I guess they saw the massive uptick in prescriptions by this doctor and called the goon squad.

      But again, how on *earth* did the doctor think he could get away with that?

      --
      -EvilMagnus
    4. Re:72,000!! by Golias · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Several bits of news here that shocked me:

      72,000 people out there actually put pills in their bodies which came from a spammer who spells it "V1Ag ra!!!"

      There was an actual doctor writing precriptions for these drugs, not just some sleazy smuggler from bolivia or some nutjob with a lab for making counterfeit placebo replacements.

      The bastards are actually got caught at all, and did not turn out to be some distant Russian or Maylaysian hackers far beyond the reach of our law enforcement systems, but rather were a pair of US citizens dumb enough to think they could get away with it.

      This is terrific news. Hoist a beer to your friendly neighborhood cyber-cop tonight, folks. It's not often the spooks get to be universally seen as the Good Guys.

      --

      Information wants to be anthropomorphized.

    5. Re:72,000!! by Clod9 · · Score: 4, Informative
      > a rate of 1 prescription every 7 seconds?
      Your math is wrong. There are 86,400 seconds in a day, so 72,000 prescriptions every 7 seconds would have taken less than a week. Admittedly, his hand would be cramped at that rate... but 72,000 in 11 months works out to about 27 per hour (working 8 hours per day), a rate I think most of us could comfortably sustain if someone was paying six or seven figures. Heck, I'd do it for five figures; except I can't because I'm not a physician, and if I were, I'd expect to get thrown in jail right alongside my spammer friend if I did it.

      In other words, I think this scum-sucking doctor is at least as due for "due process" as the spammer. The spammer is annoying, the doctor is putting peoples' lives at risk. Well, OK, they both are. Throw the book at them.

    6. Re:72,000!! by dmf415 · · Score: 5, Funny

      Maybe he got his medical degree from a non-acredited university for only $20.00!!

    7. Re:72,000!! by ndansmith · · Score: 2, Funny

      Five hundred twenty-five thousand six hundred minutes
      How do you measure, measure a year?

    8. Re:72,000!! by Golias · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Think about it. You sell ED medicine and generic monoxydil products... or whatever.

      Are you going to ask a lot of questions if a new customer comes along and starts providing you with millions of dollars worth of orders? Would you be inclided to view their decision to order all these drugs from your manufacturing plant as "suspicious" or "lucky"?

      --

      Information wants to be anthropomorphized.

    9. Re:72,000!! by Just+Some+Guy · · Score: 4, Informative
      Supposedly the DEA monitors annual prescription rates of proscribed medications (pain meds, mostly).

      My wife only has to put her DEA number on narcotic 'scripts. I don't think there's any national tracking of non-scheduled medication prescriptions, although I wouldn't assert that as a fact.

      --
      Dewey, what part of this looks like authorities should be involved?
    10. Re:72,000!! by Golias · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Considering that the average GP these days spends about 7 actual minutes with each patient, and in some cases prescribes more than one drug per visit, 27 scripts per hour is probably only slightly above the curve. I could easilly see this slipping under the radar if it wasn't for people hunting down the spammer he was working through.

      --

      Information wants to be anthropomorphized.

    11. Re:72,000!! by BikeRacer · · Score: 2, Funny

      How about love? How about love? How about love? Measure in love. Seasons of love.... Wait, shouldn't we be quoting from SpamAlot?

    12. Re:72,000!! by ptbarnett · · Score: 4, Informative
      72,000 people out there actually put pills in their bodies which came from a spammer who spells it "V1Ag ra!!!"

      According to TFA: "The indictment claims that from March 2004 to May 2005 the operation generated sales of more than $20 million from medications containing a single addictive painkiller, hydrocodone."

      Hydrocodone is probably better known as Lortab or Vicodin. It's addictive. The recipients probably weren't that picky about their source.

    13. Re:72,000!! by 'nother+poster · · Score: 2, Informative

      Mail order pharmacies are perfectly legal. As long as the pharmacies are meeting the documentation and reporting requirements for the FDA and DEA the vendors don't care. If you order Sched III drugs from the vendors, the DEA will know when and how much. You had better be able to account for the vast majority of them by the scripts you filled. Having six 10,000 count packages of Vicoden unaccounted for can get really ugly for the pham and the dispensers both. 10-15 years ago Sched III handling requirements were a pain, I can't imagine what they are like now, and I wasn't even a pharmacist, just in the industry on the IT side.

    14. Re:72,000!! by MindStalker · · Score: 2, Informative

      hydrocodone is a Schedule II opiate.

    15. Re:72,000!! by Dun+Malg · · Score: 3, Interesting
      Considering that the average GP these days spends about 7 actual minutes with each patient, and in some cases prescribes more than one drug per visit, 27 scripts per hour is probably only slightly above the curve. I could easilly see this slipping under the radar if it wasn't for people hunting down the spammer he was working through.

      Except, of course, these prescriptions were all for hydrocodone(Vicodin), which the DEA tracks. 27 scripts an hour when most of them are antibiotics or blood pressure meds might go unnoticed, but 27 a day, every day, of the same sched II controlled substance is just asking to be caught.

      --
      If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
    16. Re:72,000!! by operagost · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I'm annoyed that 72,000 dipsticks responded to his spams.

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    17. Re:72,000!! by multiplexo · · Score: 2, Interesting
      In other words, I think this scum-sucking doctor is at least as due for "due process" as the spammer. The spammer is annoying, the doctor is putting peoples' lives at risk. Well, OK, they both are. Throw the book at them.

      More War on Some Drugs bullshit. How is this doctor putting people's lives at risk? They're willingly buying these drugs, he's not dumping the stuff into the water supply late at night. This doctor is no more putting these people's lives at risk than any bartender, beer company McDonalds or tobacco company is.

      Personally I think you should be able to purchase any drug you like except for anti-virals or anti-biotics. If you want to suck down Oxycontin all day long no problemo, just don't drive or operate any heavy equipment while doing so or you'll end up in a prison cell sucking down Pruno. If you're dumb enough to take a bunch of different drugs without a doctor's prescription then you damn well deserve to die and society will be all the better off without you.

      --
      cheap labor conservatives - they want to keep you hungry enough to be thankful for minimum wage.
  3. NJ by trevordactyl · · Score: 5, Funny

    The doctor, Philip Mach, had a license to practice medicine in New Jersey but he provided prescriptions to people throughout the United States without ever evaluating them, both of which are big no-no's.

    He was giving out prescriptions without a proper medical exam? That's not a good idea. But...wait...he was practicing medicine in New Jersey? How CRIMINAL! ...Am I missing something here? What else is a big no-no?

    1. Re:NJ by Achromus · · Score: 4, Informative

      He only has a license to practice medicine in New Jersey, but he provided prescriptions to people in other states.

    2. Re:NJ by deathy_epl+ccs · · Score: 2, Informative

      I think that was something called sarcasm.

  4. Why don't they know when to stop? by DroopyStonx · · Score: 4, Insightful

    As much as I approve of crimes like this... I just don't get why they don't know when to stop.

    If you've made 3 million... walk away with what ya have. It's not worth pursuing another 3 million to risk losing it ALL.

    Greed.

    Ah well, no respect to dumb greedy criminals.

    --
    We have secretly replaced these Slashdot mods' sense of humor with a rusty nail. Let's see if they notice!!
    1. Re:Why don't they know when to stop? by nolife · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The problem with your theory is you have no idea when you are going to get caught. It is easier to look back after the fact and suggest you should have walked away one day prior to getting busted. Of course, even stopping the illegal activity 6 months prior to actually getting captured may not be enough. Investigations take a while. When the criminal feels the "heat", it is already way to late for them. The investigation from the past crimes alone could lead to the capture and any further crimes just add to the potential evidence and the punishment. A serial rapist could rape 10 people over a year period before getting caught. It is not always the 10th person that actually leads to the arrest, it could have been the evidence from the first or the second crime. Stopping after the second person would not have helped the rapist escape being caught.
      In fact, the serial rapist may fine tune his skills and leave even less evidence with each crime, of course he could get complacent and over confident as well.

      --
      Bad boys rape our young girls but Violet gives willingly.
    2. Re:Why don't they know when to stop? by BackInIraq · · Score: 2, Insightful

      As much as I approve of crimes like this... I just don't get why they don't know when to stop.

      If you've made 3 million... walk away with what ya have. It's not worth pursuing another 3 million to risk losing it ALL.


      Oh, I'm sure there are plenty of criminals out there who DO know when to stop, or at least dial it down. You just never hear about them, because they are also the ones who don't tend to get caught.

      I vaguely remember reading about a bank robber who went quite some time (decade or two?) without getting busted because he didn't get too greedy...he'd score so much in a year and call it good. It helped that he didn't tend to get violent, and hadn't killed anybody. The details are fuzzy in my mind, but the point is that there are criminals who know when to back off or even just walk away. This joker obviously wasn't one of them. I could live quite nicely off just one million dollars for the rest of my life, assuming I picked up even a low-paying job or even just invested wisely.

      Of course, it's also quite possible the IRS would eventually notice me and wonder where the money came from, especially if I didn't have gainful employment.

  5. Wow... look at the headlines. by Cytlid · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Chinese Websites Used As Launchpads For Cracking
    Piracy Not To Blame In Decline of Moviegoers
    Another Major Spammer Busted

    Who gave those in charge a clue? It seems we're starting to see a paradigm shift... people who really abuse network resources are getting caught!

    --
    FLR
  6. Both big no-no's? by RobertB-DC · · Score: 2, Funny

    The doctor, Philip Mach, 1: had a license to practice medicine in New Jersey but he 2: provided prescriptions to people throughout the United States without ever evaluating them, both of which are big no-no's.

    So, it's against the law to practice medicine in New Jersey? Wow, the things you learn on Slashdot.

    --
    Stressed? Me? Of course not. Stress is what a rubber band feels before it breaks, silly.
    1. Re:Both big no-no's? by mikvo · · Score: 5, Informative
      Let's try an alternate reading:

      The doctor, Philip Mach, had a license to practice medicine in New Jersey but he 1: provided prescriptions to people throughout the United States 2: without ever evaluating them, both of which are big no-no's.

      Better?

  7. what I would like to do... by Daytona955i · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Is smack every one of the 72000 people who bought perscriptions from this guy. I don't think we'll ever really get rid of spammers until it's not profitable for them anymore. The best way to do that is to not buy anything from them.

  8. Spammers by kevin_conaway · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Are most spammers spamming for their own business like this guy did

    I was under the impression that most of the spammers were "for hire" by marketing firms, companies, mafias, etc.

    1. Re:Spammers by sm00f · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I know a pretty big adult spammer, the trick is you have to know the owners / top guys at the companies you spam products for, then they will just "comply" with reported spam and "delete" accounts and whatnot when trouble shows up, but since you know the guys at the top, they just pay you anyways and give you new accounts to keep on spamming with since both parties are making tons of cash (he makes around $20k/month last time I knew off it, and has a shiney dodge viper in his driveway.)

  9. Another no-no by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    is using an apostrophe to make a plural. Maybe we can harness the awesome power of the spammers to send out remedial spelling emails?

    PUTTING As IN DEFINITELY? Es IN RIDICULOUS? WE CAN HELP!

  10. Oh great by Trailer+Trash · · Score: 5, Funny

    I guess my viagra and ciliax orders are going to be delayed.

  11. I feel a disturbance in the SPAM by BlackCobra43 · · Score: 4, Funny

    It's as if a thousand annoying voices screamed "C1ALIS" in unison, and were then silenced.

    It's not butchered, it's creatively adjusted!

    --
    I never spellcheck and I freely admit it. Save your karma for more worthwhile "lol erorrs" replies
  12. Good... by The+Tyro · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Burn, you son-of-a-b*tch.

    Prescription drug abuse/diversion is a major problem... I get hit with drug seekers in my ER every single day. Some of these people have legitimate chronic pain conditions and need to be under the care of a pain specialist, while others are simply using narcotics to treat their psychological pain (or just gathering "party supplies" for the weekend). Some of these people self-medicate and push their vicodin/lortab dose until they get acetaminophen toxic... bad way to end up on the liver transplant list.

    And before somebody says it, no, I don't think drug legalization is the answer.

    --
    Even if a man chops off your hand with a sword, you still have two nice, sharp bones to stick in his eyes.
    1. Re:Good... by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 5, Insightful
      Some of these people self-medicate and push their vicodin/lortab dose until they get acetaminophen toxic...

      So why the *hell* do the pharma companies use acetaminophen to "denature" their hydrocodone tablets? Wouldn't it be better not to add the acet. and just treat drug addicts who are a danger to themselves/others?

      Either that, or add something that has fairly immediate and unpleasant effects when overdosed upon, rather than acet. which has no immediate unpleasant effects, is seen by the public as "safe" (after all, it's in nonprescription Tylenol, and the nanny-state won't allow any truly *scary* drugs to be sold OTC, right?), but which often causes fatal liver/kidney damage a few days after overdosage.

      Tylenol is nasty shit - I prefer taking aspirin for my headaches. Apart from the small risk of stomach problems, it's actually a lot less toxic than Tylenol.

      -b.

    2. Re:Good... by Morgalyn · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I've always wondered about this. Do ERs have some sort of checklist / questions they ask to try and decide who is actually in pain, and who is just looking for the medicine? I was in the ER recently (thought it was appendicitis, was a ruptured cyst in my reproductive system.. so much fun, being a girl) and I had forgotten how many people use the ER for stuff like.. a hangnail, because they have little/no insurance. There was one person there who seemed to be in much more pain when any hospital officials were watching than when they were not. All she said she wanted was a refill of her medications. It made me wonder a little!

      --
      You say you got a real solution
      Well, you know
      We'd all love to see the plan
      (The Beatles)
    3. Re:Good... by The+Tyro · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Do ERs have some sort of checklist / questions

      We used to... until JCAHO decided that it was a violation of confidentiality. Most ERs kept a "frequent flier" list of their drug seekers: a recipe box with index cards was the usual method, complete with name (including aliases), preferred drug, and typical cover stories used. Those boxes were absolutely invaluable for keeping patients from doctor-shopping by surfing from ER to ER, stocking up.

      Thanks JCAHO... thanks a lot for leaning forward to help us in our fight against prescription drug diversion.

      --
      Even if a man chops off your hand with a sword, you still have two nice, sharp bones to stick in his eyes.
    4. Re:Good... by DroopyStonx · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Um... right. Your ER? You're a doc I take it, huh?

      Drugs shouldn't be illegal to begin with - that is the very problem here. Who cares what someone wants to put into their own body?

      Saying "no no" or giving them punishments for it isn't a logical deterrent, because if you don't give it to them, they'll get it elsewhere.

      The ridiculous laws make it harder for people with legitimate pain to get proper treatment. I experienced it firsthand when I had my tonsils taken out a few months back and was in HORRIBLE pain.

      I had a 12 oz bottle of lortab that I used in about 2 days because the pain was so bad. The pharmacists "couldn't believe" I went through that much in a short period of time and refused to refill it even though I had direct order from the doc to go ahead and do so.

      Pain is different for everybody, and not one person can use their fucking brain and realize that the "recommended" dosage doesn't exactly cut it in certain situations.

      Well, I know it's not the pharmacist's fault, they just follow the laws: it's the laws and the lawmakers that are the problem.

      I didn't wanna deal with the hassle and I didn't wanna wait the "legal" period to get a refill, so I sought out someone I knew that had easy access to plenty of vicodin.

      It actually worked out in my favor because I decided to circumvent the system.

      I don't blame the drug addicts, but rather the ridiculous limitations and control that the government has on everything when it's not logical to do so.

      Of course, it's what we're used to, so the common think is that it's acceptable, and to question otherwise is insane.

      It's nice to see people get modded up who have closed minded views and resort to childish anger in saying dumb shit like "Burn you son of a bitch."

      --
      We have secretly replaced these Slashdot mods' sense of humor with a rusty nail. Let's see if they notice!!
    5. Re:Good... by brokenwndw · · Score: 3, Informative

      The acetaminophen, I believe, acts in synergy with the hydrocodone, so they don't have to put as much dope in the pill to make it work.

    6. Re:Good... by DroopyStonx · · Score: 2, Insightful

      To a point... we aren't talking about rape or murder, but substances that someone willingly wants to put into their own body.

      If someone wants perscription drugs, let em pay for it and get them. Why not? If they abuse it, it's their own problem.

      People will retort with things like, "well it hurts their friends and family, and if they cause an accident or OD, yadda yadda".

      We already have laws for being under the influence of substances, so that part, which is a big concern on the minds of most people, is taken care of.

      Insurance companies won't carry them if they're an addict, and if they're somehow admitted to a hospital they will be stuck with a nice debt if they're unable to pay it off. It seems to me would be punishment enough for being so naive and not in control with yourself.

      Do you see how controlled vicodin and lortab are? It's ridiculous. We're so concerned and drowning with "drugs are bad, control them," that the laws become a hindrance to those with actual needs (as explained in my previous post).

      It might sound like I'm goin off the deep end, but when you experience how stingy pharmacies are due to these laws, you'll know.. especially if you're in terrible pain and have no way of treating it.

      --
      We have secretly replaced these Slashdot mods' sense of humor with a rusty nail. Let's see if they notice!!
    7. Re:Good... by The+Tyro · · Score: 2, Informative

      Good afternoon, Wowbagger, long time no see.

      JCAHO is the Joint Committee on the Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations. They're the guys who determine if your hospital gets "certified" to actually take care of patients. You can check out their website Here.

      They do some valuable things... but they also can ding your hospital on some truly maddening minutiae. Also, as I noted in my initial post, not all of their "input" is necessarily helpful.

      --
      Even if a man chops off your hand with a sword, you still have two nice, sharp bones to stick in his eyes.
    8. Re:Good... by Just+Some+Guy · · Score: 2, Informative
      I imagine ANYTHING that dulls pain is going to be, by nature, addictive.

      Ibuprofen is marketed as an analgesic (largely because it reduces the swelling that causes some pain), but it's not addictive. Analgesics that are CNS depressants are often (always?) addictive, but that's not the only pain relieving mechanism.

      --
      Dewey, what part of this looks like authorities should be involved?
    9. Re:Good... by The+Tyro · · Score: 2, Informative

      The studies on combination opiods/analgesics have been around for over 20 years, and suggest that combination agents (combining more than one mechanism of action) are more effective than single agents alone, even when those single agents are used in higher doses.

      Pubmed, courtesy of the NIH, is your friend.

      --
      Even if a man chops off your hand with a sword, you still have two nice, sharp bones to stick in his eyes.
    10. Re:Good... by sessamoid · · Score: 2, Informative
      We used to... until JCAHO decided that it was a violation of confidentiality.

      It was my understanding that JCAHO's regulation allowed such lists as long as they were not available to the general hospital staff and was restricted to the treating physicians in the ER. One hospital I worked at fairly recently still kept such a list on a corkboard in the physician break room. We didn't even have to compile the list ourselves since the state Dept of Health sent out a letter to all physicians who had treated patients who filled a suspicious number of controlled substances prescriptions. I wish the state where I live now did that.

      --
      "No, no, no. Don't tug on that. You never know what it might be attached to."
  13. The doctor can now look forward to... by Cr0w+T.+Trollbot · · Score: 5, Funny
    ...ten years in a Federal "pound pestle into your mortar" prison.

    - Crow T. Trollbot

    1. Re:The doctor can now look forward to... by navyjeff · · Score: 2, Funny

      ...ten years in a Federal "pound pestle into your mortar" prison.

      I thought it was making big rocks into little rocks, little rocks into pebbles, and pebbles into sand.

      Why would they make flour in prison? Then again, maybe I missed a metaphor.

    2. Re:The doctor can now look forward to... by BackInIraq · · Score: 2, Funny

      I can see him cringing every time his new cellmate gets an email advertising "Increased Girth! Stay hard longer!" (mispelled in creative filter-avoiding ways, of course)

  14. Re:Only in jail? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Print adds in my mailbox are 100 times worse than electronic spam... At least the only resources being pissed away by e-spam are electricity, network bandwidth, and time.

    Snail Spam wastes trees, oil, electricity, & time and ultimately only serves to keep the postal service in business and keeping landfills a growth market. I somehow manage to recieve 5 times more physical spam than electronic spam in my personal mailboxes.

    I hate both, but if I had to choose which one to erradicate, it would be the physical variety.

  15. What we have here is... by Stanistani · · Score: 4, Funny

    Too much vertical integration.

    If he'd just stuck to the marketing side..

    He'd still be living large...

  16. NOT BUSTED FOR SPAM! by Sooner+Boomer · · Score: 5, Informative

    Read TFA! They were NOT busted for spam! They were drug dealers, caught illegally selling narcotics. Spam was how they advertised, but they are getting NO punishment for it.

    --
    Chaos maximizes locally around me.
    1. Re:NOT BUSTED FOR SPAM! by gorbachev · · Score: 2, Interesting

      They might've not, but the fact that this ass maggot spammed you, me, your dog, my cat, the prosecutor in the case, his daughter, hurricane Katrina and a billion other people made the authorities to notice him quite quickly.

      --
      In Soviet Russia, I ruled you
  17. Spammers aren't the problem by ThatGeek · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Spammers aren't the problem. They are just a symptom. Email is a broken standard. We need to create a system that cannot be taken advantage of.

    We could even just add a bit onto the current email systems. Have clients either sign outgoing messages with a GnuPG key, or encrypt messages with the recipient's public key. All mail that isn't signed by a friend or encrypted to the recipient is trashed.

    Spammers wouldn't have an accepted sig, and they sure wouldn't have the time to encrypt each message to each address.

    --
    What are you eating? isItVeg?.
    1. Re:Spammers aren't the problem by gclef · · Score: 2, Informative

      A few news flashes for you:

      1) users hate PGP/GPG. They don't understand it, can't get it to work, and it's not worth anything to them. (google for "why johnny can't encrypt" for two good discussions of the subject.)

      2) Spammers aren't even using their own machines to send email at this point, why should they care about an extra second or two to sign or encrypt a message? It's someone else's CPU cycles, not theirs.

      3) Mailing lists, support addresses, public accounts, sales folks, etc, would all fail in your system, since they all need to be able to take in (and often send) messages to people they've never talked to before and won't have a key for.

      Encryption/signing of email is not the answer. There's a reason why email encryption has languished for 10 years...it sucks.

  18. Re:Only in jail? by Tackhead · · Score: 3, Funny
    > I'd rather see him rot in hell.

    "Hey, it;s bad enough down here!"
    - Satan

  19. Note that spam isn't sending him to jail by HotNeedleOfInquiry · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It's the illegal prescriptions.

    He sold $20,000,000 of hydrocodone in less than a year. I think the bigger question is how the hell he could sell that much of a tightly controlled narcotic before getting busted.

    --
    "Eve of Destruction", it's not just for old hippies anymore...
  20. And yet... by gubbas · · Score: 3, Insightful

    And yet, the drug maker that supplied all these over priced pills to a single doctor in such a short time gets what? Fined? Prosecuted? No, they get richer! I love the US medical industry.

    --
    "What I need is an exact list of specific unknown problems we might encounter."
    1. Re:And yet... by Just+Some+Guy · · Score: 2, Interesting
      And yet, the drug maker that supplied all these over priced pills to a single doctor in such a short time gets what?

      Unless he had the prescriptions filled at Pfizer's loading dock, WTF would you expect them to do about it? For all you know, they might have been the anonymous tipsters that got the whole prosecution started, but I know it's a lot more fun to rant and wildly speculate.

      Your irrational hatred for the pharmaceutical companies does nothing to help your credibility.

      --
      Dewey, what part of this looks like authorities should be involved?
    2. Re:And yet... by z4ce · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You must not be aware of how the prescription system works (at least in the US). When a doctor writes a prescription, you take it to a pharmacy which fulfills the prescription. The drug company has no idea that a single doctor is filing many of the prescriptions.

    3. Re:And yet... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      And yet, the drug maker that supplied all these over priced pills to a single doctor in such a short time gets what? Fined? Prosecuted? No, they get richer! I love the US medical industry.

      Translation: "Waah! Other people have more money than me and I don't like it! Waah!"

      Good job, mods. Really.

      As for the pharmaceutical companies, how they hell are they supposed to know? It's not like he placed a bulk order and gave it all out at his office. 72,000 prescriptions spread out over the course of a year filled at pharmacies across the entire United States... background noise on their radar screen.

      If anything, it only shows that there needs to be tighter integration of medical information when prescriptions get filled. Hopefully not so much as to inconvenience the customer at the counter, cause that shit can get tiresome. It wouldn't be an issue of privacy either, just have a database storing the name of the doctor who wrote it (well, some unique identifier thereof) and the drug being prescribed. Then 72,000 hits on one doctor would put him well within visual range of anybody watching that system.

    4. Re:And yet... by aaarrrgggh · · Score: 2, Informative
      When a doctor writes a prescription, you take it to a pharmacy which fulfills the prescription. The drug company has no idea that a single doctor is filing many of the prescriptions.


      So wrong! The drug companies actually track their success rates with specific doctors to help their marketing. They need to know what kinds of junkets are most effective!

      When a perscription is filled, the information goes into a DEA database and a drug company database. I don't know the specifics on the system, but the DEA has a very good idea who is writing prescriptions for what. When a doctor looses a prescription pad and it gets abused, he will be investigated.
  21. Re:Only in jail? by rsrsharma · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Here's a little trick to stop spam that I literally discovered yesterday: take your mail server down for a while. Seriously. (Of course, this assumes that you have your own mail server, but I'm guessing a significant number of /.ers do.) Mine was unreachable yesterday because I forgot to renew my domain (heh, oops). Today I only recieved one piece of spam, and I'm sure that anything meaningful that didn't make it through yesterday got bounced back and will be resent. I dunno if it will last, but hey, its worth a shot.

    I also remember hearing on TWiT that some guy has blocked all HTML e-mail outside of his whitelist to avoid spam, and it works. Seems a little too harsh though.

  22. I should be a spammer.. by dustinbarbour · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It seems that the market is losing some of its biggest players. With the immense amount of money to be made spamming, now seems to be the best time to get into the business!

  23. Another Great Victory by MrCopilot · · Score: 3, Insightful
    From TFA:
    In May, a federal judge shut down Xpress Pharmacy and appointed a receiver to take control of the business' assets. Federal authorities seized $1.8 million in luxury cars, two homes and $1.3 million in cash.

    Figures, they had to wait till it was profitable.

    Now what are all those HydroCodine Junkies gonna do? Head straight to Crack and Crystal Meth. Ahhh, Justice.

    The indictment contains various counts of conspiracy to dispense controlled substances, wire fraud, money laundering, distributing controlled substances and introducing misbranded drugs into interstate commerce.

    I'm all for prison-raping the spammers, but if they don't charge him with any spam offenses, then we're all jumping on the War on Drugs Bandwagon. Count me out.

    Make it a crime to repeatedly use my computer equipment for unsolicited Advertisements. Fine them at an advertiser rates. 5 cents a email. Charge him with this crime & let the bunkmates line up.

    The doctor faces what charges?

    The U.S. Attorney's Office said Mach was represented by Bruce Levy of New Jersey. A call to his office was not immediately returned Wednesday.

    Oh.

    --
    OSGGFG - Open Source Gamers Guide to Free Games
  24. I'm always amazed by Zunni · · Score: 3, Insightful

    It never ceases to amaze me that people (users) continue to do business this way.

    People wonder why the spamming never ends, it's because 72,000 perscriptions were bought through an email ad.

    Spamming really does work, it's cheap, and highly effective as evidenced by the above numbers.

  25. Re:Only in jail? by Shads · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Nod, try greylisting, that helps a ton too. Most spammers don't use real mail servers that comply with the rfc's... so generally if you missed the mail on the first run you're not going to get it.

    There was an excellent piece on slashdot a while back about spamfiltering... infact here's a link to it: http://acme.com/mail_filtering/ killer stuff there on prevention. He gets a level of spam that would put me outta my mind.

    --
    Shadus
  26. Does anyone have his prison address? by WormholeFiend · · Score: 2, Funny

    I would like to offer him some herbal rectal relief medications at a very reasonable price, no prescription needed!

  27. Why are you demonizing this guy? by Phiro · · Score: 5, Funny

    Other than the naughty bit about paying his pet doctor $7 for each non-exam script, this was a stand-up guy. He did exactly what he claimed he would. How many so-called spammers out there can say that? This guy had _thousands_ of satisified, repeat customers. Nobody was getting ripped off, in fact I'd wager the majority of the scripts that were filled were cheaper to the customer than if they went to Walgreens/Target/whatever and had it filled. This guy SAVED the health industry millions and he's demonized for fraud. Fraud? In what way? How did he defraud customers? Didn't he supply them with exactly what they were ordering at a fraction of the usual cost? Spamming? How is he different than Ford or GM putting their commercials on every 6 minutes during your prime time show? --- It wouldn't take much to turn this guy into a modern day Robin Hood. You all act like he's satan incarnate, in reality it's nothing but a very successful businessman with an overly invasive advertising scheme (but no spyware or adware!) who gave his customers exactly what they wanted at a price both parties were happy with. How many other businesses can match that?

  28. Re:So spam works? by Aranth+Brainfire · · Score: 2, Funny

    Not any more.

    --
    "Quoting yourself is stupid." -Me
  29. 25 : ) by milimetric · · Score: 3, Funny

    25 year old, hm... 3 million dollars worth of stuff is pretty nice at 25. The only problem is... when you go to hit on a girl... what do you say you do? SPAM? Hey baby... I'm a spammer. Wanna SPAM? You know baby, I could make a couple of calls and all that spam in your inbox would be gone?

    HEY, there's an idea, do you think these people know how to protect THEMSELVES from SPAM???? WOA!! I'm a freakin genius. I'm sure this guy's girlfriend isn't getting Viagra adds, how do they do it? Maybe we can just use their methods against themselves.

    I rock so hard.

  30. MOD PARENT UP by scovetta · · Score: 2, Funny

    Please mod parent up. She's a girl. We want to be really, really nice to her so she'll stick around.

    --
    Wer mit Ungeheuern kämpft, mag zusehn, dass er nicht dabei zum Ungeheuer wird. --Nietzsche
  31. Bringing Them to the Attention of the DEA by s7uar7 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    My website gets around 30 hits a minute (from seperate IPs) with fake referrer spam for sites selling prescription drugs. Anything with a drug name in the referrer, Phentermine, Xanax etc, gets an http 302 redirect to dea.gov; the original referrer isn't replaced. Who knows, maybe no one there ever looks at the logs, but if they do there's a few sites they might be interested in.

  32. A new application of an old way to fight crime by techno-vampire · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Back during Prohibition, a number of gangsters were sent to prison for tax evasion. The Feds couldn't get any evidence about the really bad things like extortion, robbery and murder, so they used what they could get. This is just more of the same thing, and a great idea. Professional spammers are likely to be breaking a number of laws, so investigate them and charge them with whatever you can find. Selling drugs, tax evasion, fraud, whatever.

    --
    Good, inexpensive web hosting
  33. Re:Only in jail? by TFoo · · Score: 2, Informative

    Except that for print advertising, the SENDER pays the bulk of the costs (in the form of postage) wheras with electronic spam, the RECEIVER pays the cost (in terms of mail storage space and processing) --- therefore junk-snail-mail tends to be somewhat self-regulating, wheras junk email is not.

  34. Not busted for "spamming" by erroneus · · Score: 5, Interesting

    He was busted for something else right? Something related to illegal drug activity, wire fraud, money laundering...? Stuff like that?

    So far, all this does is make "illegal" activities proliferated by spam something that will get you busted....

    Hrm... okay so this WILL make a dent in the war on spam. But I would still like to see more people jailed for the activity of spamming rather than for more common reasons.

  35. 72,000 More... by catdevnull · · Score: 3, Insightful

    They should fine each person who answers illegal ads, too. If a spammer sends out 1,000,000 junk mails for almost no cost and one ass clown answers, it makes it worth his trouble. It's like prostitution or drug dealing: both buyer and seller should be busted.

    --

    I might know what I'm talkin' about, but then again, this is Slashdot...
  36. Why he's in jail by Animats · · Score: 4, Informative
    A bit of history. Back in May, his company was shut down by court order. His assets and house were seized. An injunction was issued to stop him from further spamming. A court-appointed receiver took over the operation, paid off the employees, and shut the operation down. Meanwhile, a criminal indictment was in progress, but not yet completed.

    So Smith went to the Dominican Republic and tried to restart spamming from there. On June 28th, a judge issued an arrest warrant for him. When he returned to the US, he was arrested, but released on bail, with home monitoring.

    The prosecution then asked for a six-month criminal contempt sentence for trying to violate the injunction and fleeing prosecution. Smith had a court date for that in July, and lost. So now he's in jail for six months.

    This is somebody who just didn't get it when the court ordered him to stop.

    This is just the first phase. The felony case is just getting underway.

  37. Make good use of siezed properties by halcyon1234 · · Score: 4, Funny
    Federal authorities have already seized over $3 million in cash, luxury cars, and houses."

    Okay, great. Now that just means things'll be quiet for a couple months, and then it will be business as normal. If we really want to stop future spam, here's what we can don:

    1. Sieze the customer list.
    2. Send each of those customers a bottle of cyanide pills, but label the bottle "Teh Medz u 0rdred!!!!!!!"
    3. Pass the customer list on to Poison Control, so they can block the phone numbers.

    Now you've eliminated the customer base of spam messages. With no customers, spamming won't be profitable ($3 Million?!?!). If it's not profitable, it'll stop.

    Tah-dah.